MTG on the Neocons’ Hatred for America and What’s Truly Going on Behind the Scenes in Washington

We were just laughing about it in the studio a  minute ago. It was a year and a half ago this. week was October 27th, 2024 that we all went down  to New York City to the Trump rally at Madison. Square Garden. It was in the final moments of  that campaign. And it was really one of the most. exciting political events, even after a lifetime  of going to political events I've ever been to. It was right in the middle of Manhattan, New York  City, a place that did not support Donald Trump.

despite the fact he's from there. And it was  again days before the presidential election. And it was packed. You showed up and there  was a line way down the block and then the. next block and the next block after that.  And the people in the line, if you looked, weren't just from other places. They were just  bridging tunnel people coming in from Long. Island to support Trump. Some looked like they  were from Manhattan. And people were excited. really excited and you go inside and the place is  just absolutely packed. I spoke at the request of. the campaign and was happy to do it. And what we  were laughing about a minute ago and something I.

remember very well was a sea of placards of  campaign signs in the crowd all provided by. the campaign that said quote mass deportations  now. Mass deportations now. I remember thinking. well that's kind of heavy. I don't think I've  ever heard any candidate say mass deportations. It's kind of forbidden to talk like that, mass  deportations. But the Trump campaign was saying. it without apology. And there was something  thrilling about that because on the other hand,

why not? When you live in a country with more laws  than anyone can keep track of when you live in a. constant state of mild anxiety that you might  transgress, break one of these laws and be held. to account for it. When you live in a country  that put Martha Stewart in jail for six months. for insider trading and a lot of other people away  for a lot longer than that for crimes that no one. could even really understand or explain. In some  cases, the people committing them didn't know they. were committing them. That's real. If you live in  a country like that, why shouldn't foreigners who.

break your law at very least be asked to leave?  Is that crazy? And if they're not asked to leave, then why are you obeying the law? Why is you  living in fear of violating the tax code or. some SEC reggg or some wetlands regulation  that's never been voted on but that you can. be severely punished for breaking filling in a  vernal pool in your backyard without knowing it.

etc etc etc. If foreigners don't have to follow  our laws why are we paying our taxes? That's. real. And by the way, shouldn't the people who  live in a country, who are born in that country, get to decide who else lives in the country? Isn't  it up to the population who comes and whether. or not they want to be replaced by new people?  Maybe they do. Okay. In a Democratic Republic, it's their right. But if they don't want to be, if  they want to keep the population pretty much the.

same, they don't want any radical change, and that  is the view of most people, why can't they have. that? And if they're not getting it, if you have a  rogue presidential administration that spends four. years just inviting the rest of the world to come  to the United States and live off public funds, use public schools and drive on public roads  and use the emergency rooms for healthcare, thereby destroying hospitals across the country,  making it impossible for poor Americans who want.

to get their healthcare in emergency rooms to  do so. Why is it crazy to make them leave and. come and apply legally if they want to move  here and then turn them down if you want. to cuz again it's your country. It's up to  you who lives here. None of that is crazy. And so as you looked out or as I looked out from  the stage at Madison Square Garden on this sea of. placards saying mass deportations now it was kind  of titillating but it was also kind of thrilling.

because it wasn't just about deporting people some  of whom are probably very nice people doubtless. very nice people don't want to be deported of  course understand that but their desire not. to be deported has to in a republic be balanced  against and given less weight and the population's. right to decide who else gets to live here. I  that's very basic. In fact, it's the most basic. thing. If you don't have that, you don't have  representative government. And so to see those.

signs was a reminder that actually maybe there  is a political solution to this problem. Maybe. we can vote our way if not out of this at least to  a slightly better place. can exert some authority. as voters. The people in charge can allow us to  influence the course of events in our country. Isn't that the way the system is supposed to  work? It was pretty exciting the possibility that.

could be real. But immigration was not the only  topic that day. I remember very vividly standing. backstage with a bunch of the other speakers and  listening to people as they stood up and a lot of. them talked about Israel and America's steadfast  bedrock commitment to the security of Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, our  ally in the region, historic ties, defending. Israel is defending the West, etc., etc., etc. And  personally, I didn't think that much about it. For.

maybe the past 10 years, maybe even longer, maybe  since the Bush administration, public declarations. of love for Israel are kind of a stock feature  at Republican political events because Republican. party is for Israel. And that's okay. It's okay  to be for Israel. I never really thought too much. about it. Israel not being really at the center  of my thinking about anything most of the time. So, it didn't occur to me that a party publicly  committed above all to the defense of Israel would.

be incapable or unwilling to defend itself. Never  occurred to me. Seemed like you could do both. Okay, we like Israel. That's great. Doesn't mean  we can't make life better here for Americans, does. it? Doesn't mean we can't act in our own interest,  too, even as we're acting in the interest of this. other country. because there are some highly  enthusiastic proponents of that other country. in positions of authority in the Republican  party. That's okay. We can all coexist. We'll. support Israel, whatever that means, as long as it  doesn't mean like going to war with Iran in regime.

change effort that's going to cause global famine,  destroy global energy markets, make America poor, wreck the US dollar, cause hyperinflation. As  long as we don't do that, totally fine. Want. to support Israel? Great. You're into that. I'm  into model trains. Next guy's into golf. We all. have our obsessions. Yours is Israel. It's okay.  But they're not mutually exclusive. But it turns. out they may be mutually exclusive. It turns out  that maybe Jesus was right. You can't serve two.

masters. You could only have one because you will  always wind up loving one and hating the other. Maybe that's not just a theological concept.  It's a hard and true fact of human nature. You can only have one core loyalty and to all  others you will have not just indifference but. maybe contempt. And that's becoming very very  obvious a year and a half after that Madison. Square Garden rally where not only have we not  witnessed Matt's deportations or the completion.

of the wall or even the substantial construction  of the wall, we've witnessed a continuation. of hundreds of thousands of H1B visa workers  coming here mostly from India. 70% from India, mostly into tech jobs. at exactly the moment when  the same people advocating for those H-1B visas. are warning us, warning us, straight up warning  us that entire sectors of our economy are about.

to go away thanks to AI that this is really  the last moment that your kid with a degree. in computer science or programming has be able to  find a job because they are now telling us as of. today that 50% at least maybe maybe more of all  American jobs will be affected maybe eliminated. by AI in the next 2 or 3 years. So this is now.  So why would you advocate for foreigners to come.

in and take jobs in a sector that's about to  be radically reduced in size. In other words, there are fewer jobs, but you're giving hundreds  of thousands of them to foreign nationals. Why would you do that? Why would you have any  immigration at all into a country that's about to. lose 50% of its high-paying jobs? Why would you do  that? You certainly wouldn't do that if you love.

that country. In fact, that's the last thing you  would do. If you were in charge of a country and. you sincerely believe that 50% of white collar  jobs were going to disappear or change in some. unspecified way, meaning begin to disappear.  How many people would you import into your. labor market? Well, zero. Not one. Not a single  one. You would want a much tighter labor market.

because the value of labor is about to plummet.  And that means that millions of Americans will. be left with not enough or nothing at all to  do. And that will be terrible for them because. people without work are volatile, unhappy people.  They're people without a purpose. And that will. mean disaster potentially for your country because  unemployed people in large numbers are dangerous. And that's why the last time this happened,  the president of the United States at the time, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, whatever his faults,  many manifold, decided to mobilize unemployed men.

in the Civilian Conservation Corps in the largest  peacetime mobilization in world history. And you. know who led that mobilization? General Douglas  MacArthur, later famous for many other reasons, in the Philippines and in Japan. He put a general  in charge of putting America's unemployed men. to work. Then in the course of that work, they  basically rebuilt the national parks and built. the GW Parkway through downtown DC and actually  did a lot of pretty amazing work to the country's.

infrastructure, much of which still stands.  So he both avoided domestic unrest, maybe even. revolution, and he improved the country in the  process. It's not an endorsement of all of his. policies. In some ways, a truly horrible president  got us into World War II for no obvious reason, etc., etc. But in this one way, the Roosevelt  administration took very seriously the problem.

of having lots of unemployed people. What are  our leaders doing about AI right now? Well, they're trying to profit from it. Of course,  they're trying to make a lot of money from it. their friends and family and themselves. There's  the last big boom time before the casino shuts. down. That's the first thing they're doing.  The second thing they're doing is scaring the. crap out of the rest of us about the effects of  it. Not even making any effort at all to sell it. as a positive good for the average person. AI is  coming. It's going to be difficult, but trust me,

it's going to be awesome cuz here's why. There's  almost none of that. There's almost no effort. to reassure you that the largest technological  change in our lifetimes will be in any way a win. for you. In fact, they're telling you right  to your face, it's going to be a disaster. What is that? Why are they telling you that to  prepare you? How do you prepare for that? Your. job goes away. What happens next? There's no hint.  It's going to be tough. Yeah. You think if this. all comes true, it's going to be very, very tough.  So, why are they telling you? And in addition to.

telling you, they're also continuing to import  people to compete for a rapidly shrinking number. of jobs. Well, that's just a middle finger in  your face. That's a humiliation exercise. That's. the opposite of trying to comfort you. That's  trying to stoke your anxiety. That's trying. to make you feel worthless. That's revealing how  they really feel about you. That's answering the.

central question of our moment, which is, are we a  ruled by people who are selfish and short-sighted. and capable of longitudinal thought, totally  unwise, greedy? Is that the leadership class. we have? Or is it even worse than that? Are we  ruled by an elite that actually hates us and. hates the West and is doing whatever it can to  harm the population of the United States and the. West and of Europe and of Canada and Australia,  New Zealand, the West. Are the people in charge.

actively angry at us? Do they not like us at  all? Do they mean us harm? You don't want to. think that. That's so dark. Could that really be  true? Hard to imagine it. Your average American. used to living in a very nice country, very nice  people, a country where people are so nice that. people who aren't nice, people with dark motives,  really go out of their way to hide those motives, to dress them up as I don't know what, charity to  build a NGO around whatever plans they have. No,

really, we're helping you here. Americans  are not used to imagining that the people. in charge have not simply no interest in them, but  actively desire to harm them. And the first time. most people in this country even entertained the  possibility of something so grotesque was during.

CO when it became really clear that the CO shots  not only weren't safe, they weren't effective. There was no possible upside to this whatsoever.  And then the downsides became well too obvious to. ignore. People started dying. Kids started  having heart attacks. Women stopped having. babies in the numbers they were having before.  It was causing infertility. Obviously people, you know, started getting pancreatic cancer,  something that was so rare 30 years ago. It.

was the kind of thing you'd heard about once in a  while. Pancreatic cancer. Yeah, there's no fixing. that one. That's the worst cancer you have. It's  incredibly painful and it's not curable. All of. a sudden, you know, 10 people with pancreatic  cancer. What's that? Maybe it's not connected. to the CO shots. We wouldn't know because no  one's tried to figure it out. So vanishingly. small is the interest from our ruling class  in finding out the effects of the COVID vacc.

Our vast public health infrastructure has  not been mobilized to find out what the. effects of the biggest inoculation campaign  in global history were. We still can't say, but it's obvious they weren't positive. So if  you wind up killing a lot of people, which the. code vax did, and then you refuse to find out  where the virus came from in the first place,

and then you pretend that nothing bad happened,  it's kind of hard not to suspect that maybe you. want to hurt me. You don't want to think that, but  what's the other answer? But it's on the question. of immigration and not just immigration on this  eve of technological revolution on the eve of. AI that it becomes very very clear that the same  people who pushed us into a regime change war with.

Iran. A war that will by definition cause famine  even now if it stopped today. People would starve. around the world. There's it's a math question as  to with energy and fertilizer and this will cause. hunger and starvation mostly in Africa but not  just those same people are also the ones literally. the same people who are pushing the United States  to continue to allow the rest of the world to move.

here. And once again, there is no justification  for this on practical grounds. Zero. And you. know that because no one's even trying to make the  case. It used to be when people stood up and said, "We need more immigration." They at least paid you  the compliment of explaining that our industries, our factories need this. Our who's going to  pick the grapes? Our farms need this. Low-wage. immigrant labor makes the bounty possible.  That's the case they made for generations,

more than 100 years. And in some cases they were  right. It's true. The United States did get a lot. out of the consumer in the United States did get  a lot out of low-wage immigrant labor. Fact. There. were also downsides. But the economic case at  least was coherent. Short-term it was coherent. You never hear that anymore because it's not true.  Most agriculture is automated. Tech jobs are going. away. Law firms are going to start laying off  people. Meta, which you'd think would be immune.

from all of this because it's got a pretty great  business model based on spying on you and selling. your preferences to advertisers. Meta laid off  8,000 people the other day thanks to AI. So, this is coming for everyone. So at that moment to  advocate for more low-wage low-skll immigration. into the United States which we I think we can  say conclusively despite the virtue or lack of. thereof among the specific immigrants I think we  can say is a net cost to the United States there's.

really no debate about that at this point anyone  advocating for that is aggressively opposed to. the interests of the population that's shocking  but it's happening And it's the same people who. pushed for the war with Iran specifically. So  two weeks ago, there was a vote in the House of. Representatives about whether to extend temporary  protective status, TPS, to hundreds of thousands.

of Haitians who have been living here for quite  some time. They came here illegally. They were. granted protection for reasons that aren't exactly  clear. It's not obvious why the United States owes. the people of Haiti a debt. United States has not  made Haiti better, but not for lack of spending. money on Haiti. Hades problems are resistant to  our interventions. I think we can say that for. whatever reason, but the United States has been  intervening in Haiti for over a hundred years. It hasn't gotten better. So, hundreds of thousands  of Haitians came here illegally. They were granted.

this temporary legal status and the House of  Representatives had to vote on whether to reup. it or not. And they just did. And 10 Republicans  voted with all Democrats to extend the protection, which is now extended. And they'll tell you  they're not taking any welfare benefits. But. of course, like all poor people who move here,  they are fundamentally dependent on public. services. Of course, particularly healthare at  a moment when the average birthright American.

is wondering how do I pay my health insurance  premiums or just has forgone them completely. Doesn't have health insurance. Many people in  this country, millions of people have decided, I. can't afford health insurance. Is that the moment  that you want to turn our public health resources, our emergency rooms over to foreigners? It's  just the opposite. That is an act of aggression. against Americans. Well, who voted for it? Of  the 10 Republicans who voted to extend temporary.

protection another 18 months only. In fact,  the most fervent supporters of the state of. Israel in the House of Representatives, almost to  a person, are the same people who voted for this. And they would include Mike Lawler of New York,  the sponsor of the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act. or something to that effect, a censorship bill.  Criticism of Israel should be illegal. That's the. thrust always. He's one of the people who voted  for this. Congressman Don Bacon. Congressman.

Don Bacon of Omaha, Nebraska, second district. In  fact, it's Warren Buffett's dad's seat. Don Bacon, Air Force General, one of the most flid  red-in-the-faced neocons in the Congress. Nicole Melotakus, also of New York. Congressman  Salazar from Florida. These are Israel's most. loyal soldiers in the United States Congress, and  they are voting to open our borders once again.

So, it's yet more evidence, and that evidence has  been mounting for many years, as we're going to. show you in a minute, that there is a direct  connection between loyalty to a foreign power. and a desire to hurt this country. You cannot  be loyal to two masters at once. You will love. one and hate the other, to restate. And again,  that's not just a Bible verse. It's the daily. lived reality of every human being. You can have  but one true loyalty, and you will hate the rest.

And they clearly do. And we've known this for a  while. So here's now semi famous not famous enough. videotape of a man called Bill Crystal speaking  at a AEI event AEI is a neoconservative think tank. in Washington the American Enterprise Institute.  And Bill Clint Crystal was for many many years the. most famous and most influential neoonservative  voice in Washington DC and hence the country. He's one of the founders of the project for the  new American century which laid out why in about. 199798 why we needed to go to war with Iraq. This  was before the pretext of 9/11 was introduced.

before they told us that actually Saddam was  behind 9/11. This was just a blueprint for how. the United States military needs to knock off  needs to regime change Israel's opponents in. the region to give Israel regional hegemony.  And now a lot of us who watched this happen, in fact I worked about 10 feet away from where  that document was formulated didn't pay a lot.

of attention. It didn't seem first of all likely  to happen. Are we really going to invade Iraq, kill Gaddafi, overturn the Assad regime in Syria?  I mean, it's so far away. Are we really going to. do that? We've got problems here. I don't think  it's actually going to happen. Number one, and. number two, that's just a different realm. That's  foreign policy. That's like an academic exercise. doesn't really have much to do with life here in  the United States. And in any case, the people. advocating for it are doing so and they tell us  this all the time because they think it's good for.

the United States. This is in our interest. This  is for our safety. We need to spend a trillion. dollars or now a trillion half dollars a year  on the Pentagon so we will thrive at home. So. the homeland will be safe and prosperous. That's  we call it the Department of Homeland Security. because the first concern is the homeland, the  country where we live, the country our ancestors. built. the United States. That's the goal is to  protect the United States and its people. Cuz what. is the United States but its people? That's all  it is. It's American citizens. And we need to help.

them. And admittedly, it's kind of complicated  our plan. We're going to we're going to bring. democracy to flower in the Middle East, but that  will make it a lot better here. That's what they. were telling us. And some of us who weren't  paying enough attention or weren't wise enough. to understand the difference between a truth and  a lie kind of ignored it. Okay, now Syria, Iraq, go crazy. But with the rise of Donald Trump in  2015, it became a lot clearer what was actually.

going on. Donald Trump, whatever his demonstrated  faults, is brilliant at one thing. He is a genius. And this may be unintentional at bringing into  stark relief the differences in worldviews between. people and groups. Donald Trump is a living  roarshock blot. You look at Donald Trump, what do. you see? And so his purpose really for the last 10  years, maybe his most important purpose has been. to show the rest of us what the debate is really  about and what the stakes really are and what the.

people involved in those debates actually think.  because something about Donald Trump evokes a kind. of involuntary honesty in people and they just  blurt out what they think. And that happened to. Bill Crystal in 2017. Now, Crystal was a kind of  half-hearted Trump supporter up until the moment. in early 2016 when Trump traveled to Greenville,  South Carolina, and engaged in a Republican. candidates debate, a primary debate with Jeb  Bush and the other 27 people running that year or.

whatever the number was. And during that debate,  he famously said to Jeb Bush, "Your brother got us. into the dumbest war in history. The Iraq war was  a huge mistake. Only the weapons manufacturers got. anything out of that. It hurt this country, killed  a lot of people, and it drained our treasury.". That was a mistake. And it was at that specific  moment that Trump lost the support of Bill Crystal. and everyone like Bill Crystal in Washington, the  neoconservative foreign policy establishment. The.

people who really sincerely believed the signers  of the project for the new American century. mission statement, which would include Dick  Cheney and Bob Kagan, John Bolton, all of them, all of those people decided that Trump was not  simply a candidate they couldn't support. he. was their enemy and they become became famously  never Trump and that's why that was the issue his. criticism of the Iraq war was the issue that drove  them not simply away from Trump but to the polar.

opposite position many became Democrats including  Bill Crystal and that really should have told us. something right there really that's your red line  the Iraq war why is that so important to you what. about the opioid crisis raging here what about the  fact that our industrial drill base is gone. Have. you driven across America recently? How's it look?  Midtown Manhattan, is it is it pretty clean? And. this immigration question, why shouldn't we build  a wall? We paid for Israel's wall. Why can't we.

have one? What's the answer? There was very little  conversation about that. Why is this one issue, support for Israel, the only thing that matters to  you? It's hard to know, but it clearly was. And in. the case of Bill Crystal, we're grateful that it  was because he was so enraged by Trump that he. began to tell the truth and he began to see what  he really thinks. Not simply about Trump, not that. interesting, but about the United States and his  population, the people who live here, Americans,

American citizens. What do you think of them, Bill  Crystal? Well, here in 2017, Bill Crystal explains. what he thinks of the rest of us. Watch. Look,  to be totally honest, if things are so bad, as. you say, with the white working class, don't you  want to get new Americans in who aren't going to. be I'm serious. You can make a case that this is  going on too long and this is too crazy probably. And I hope this thing isn't being like, you know,  videotaped or ever shown anywhere. My whatever.

tiny pathetic future I have is going to be totally  coll. You can make a case that America has become. has been great because every every I think John  Adams said this the beginning, right? Basically, if you're in a free society, a capitalist society,  after two, three, four generations of hard work, everyone becomes kind of decadent, lazy, spoiled,  whatever. And then you luckily you have these. waves of people coming in from Italy and Ireland  and Russia and now Mexico who really want to work. hard and really want to succeed and really want  their kids to live better lives than them and.

aren't sort of clipping coupons or hoping that  they can hang on and meanwhile, you know, grew. up with spoiled kids and so forth. It it's hard to  even comprehend the contempt in that statement for. clipping coupons and kind of hanging on lazy,  decadent, spoiled. He's describing Americans. He's describing you and the people who live next  to you and down the street and across the country. is describing people whose ancestors built this  nation and he's given up on them and he hates them.

and he doesn't have the self-control to prevent  himself from saying so out loud which he just. did clipping coupons. Now think of it this way.  If you're a leader of this or any other country. or any organization or any family, your duty  is to the people you lead and that duty has. to be informed by love for those people. And so  imagine the father of unruly kids taking the same. position. My kids are hard to deal with. They're  lazy. They're spoiled. They don't have any money.

They're clipping coupons or whatever. Just hanging  on. So to a father who loves his kids, of course. the answer would be, "What can I do to help? How  can I make them less lazy, less entitled? How. can I give them spark, drive? How can I get them  on the right path?" No decent father would say, "These kids are way below my expectation. It's  inevitable, by the way. When they get to their. teen years, they're just useless. I'm getting  new kids. I'm just going to adopt some new kids.".

Maybe they don't even speak English. I don't  have to even listen to their concerns, really. Maybe they'll just be so grateful for three square  meals, they'll do whatever I say. And my own kids, they can go die. A father with that attitude would  be a monster. A leader of a country with that. attitude is a monster. And that is exactly the  attitude Bill Crystal revealed maybe for the first. time in public. And it's an attitude with profound  consequences. And maybe it shouldn't surprise.

us. Anyone who can advocate for the murder of  children in Gaza, actual kids, Palestinian kids, but still kids, not political, not responsible for  any any crime at all cuz they're children. Anyone. who can look at their deaths and say, "No big  deal." is probably not the kind of person you want. in charge of anything in your country. Because  that reveals hatred for other human beings. And.

no one who hates other human beings like that can  ever have authority over you because they'll treat. you like the Palestinians at a certain point. And  they are. So it shouldn't shock us. But when that. video came out, it did shock the few who were  paying attention. Really? I thought the neocon. program was designed to help us. At least that's  what you claimed. But you have hatred for us. And.

in the subsequent years, the nine years since  he said that, it's become incredibly obvious. Virtually every bad policy emanating from our  government comes from exactly to a person the. same members of Congress and the same members of  the administration who are advocating for wars. like the one we're in now. All of them are bad  for the country and they would include and the. list is very long. AI again hard to see how that's  good for us. Hard to see how it's a good idea to.

put a data center in your town. Your utilities go  up, your water gets poisoned, almost nobody gets. employed. How is this a win for you? Shut up.  We're getting a data center. That would include. our drug policy where over 100,000 Americans still  die every year of overdose. What are we doing. about that? Is it even a conversation? No. That  would include the more grotesque and flamboyant.

and cartoonish expressions of hatred toward  Americans like transgender surgeries for children. Yes, those are still going on because neocons  in the Congress have blocked any attempt to. stop them. That's a fact. You can look it up. And  above all, it informs their views of immigration, which are motivated, as Bill Crystal just showed,  not by what we thought they were motivated by, trying to hike GDP. They think it's good for the  aggregate economy. No, they don't like the people.

who live here and they would like to see them  replaced. Crystal just said that and the behavior. of the rest show that that is true. And these  are exactly the same people who've inspired these. policies in Europe. And let's stop lying. Europe  does not have autonomy. Europe is a confederation. called the EU that is a vassel of the United  States. We know that because there are American. troops throughout Europe. Europe is under the  thumb of the control of NATO which is controlled. by the United States. So what happens in Europe,  whether it's energy policy or immigration policy,

happens because our leaders sign off on it. So  let's stop the pretense. Germany is not making. its own decisions at all. The United States is  making those decisions and those decisions over. the past 30 years have destroyed the population  of Europe and that's probably not an accident. Nor. are the coming food shortages. Nor is the coming  migration crisis which is coming. When there are. food shortages in subsaharan Africa where more  than a billion people live, where are they going?

Europe and the United States? To the West? That's  all obvious. That's not a conspiracy theory. Watch. it happen. and the people who inspired it knew  it was going to happen and it happening was part. of the reason they did it in the first place. So,  this is just another way of letting you know that. the motives here are not only impure, they're  not simply disloyal, they are malicious. But. watch it now from a couple of members of Congress  explaining or really failing to explain why these.

are Republicans. These are MAGA members. These are  very loyal soldiers in the MAGA army. Watch them. explain or again not explain. Watch them deflect  questions about why they voted to extend temporary. protection to Haitian illegal aliens. Here's  the first up and this is Maria Salazar of South. Florida. We have uh almost a hundred Democrats  that are willing to vote for this because look,

it's impossible if we the Republicans put  together a bill like this one on the floor for any. Democrats in in with with Hispanics supposedly,  you know, Hispanics belong to the Democrats. Not anymore. Because right now we're going to be  demonstrating to the Dems that we are not such a. bunch of racists that we're giving them dignity,  not citizenship, right? So we're not racist. Who. said you were racist? We're not racist. So we  need to do this or else we will be perceived as.

racist. In fact, we will be racist. Now, that is  precisely the style of argument with air quotes. that Republicans, including Donald Trump, very  famously objected to when the left employed it. Shut up, racist. It became a meme and for good  reason. rather than respond to the argument, rather than make the affirmative case, it's a good  idea for the United States to do this because that. sentence never got completed. It was outrageous  for you to ask questions about it and the massive.

unprecedented demographic change in this country,  not just in Europe, here, especially here, because if you asked about it or demanded an  answer to understand why it was happening, you were quote racist. Racist. Okay. now. And that  is a MAGA Republican. That is a confirmed neocon, a loyal soldier for Apac telling you that if  you ask questions about it, you're racist.

Maria Salazar, ladies and gentlemen, of the  state of Florida. But here really is someone. that all of us should pay a lot closer attention  to. This is Congressman Don Bacon of Omaha. Again, a former Air Force general. Why is it, by the  way, and you hate to even notice this because. it's there's something really troubling about it,  but the more time our representatives seem to have. spent as military officers or intelligence  officers, the more hostile they seem to be.

to American citizens. It's just something we've  noticed. You don't want to think that, by the way, is all Americans correctly have respect for  their armed services. But it is true, and anyone. who served in the Congress can verify this, that  members who have been officers in the US military. tend to have the most anti-American views. Very,  very odd. It'd be interesting to know why that. is. Just noticing. In any case, here's Congressman  Don Bacon asked by a reporter, "Hey, why' you vote.

to extend this protection? Why are you doing  something that's the very opposite of what. Donald Trump ran on when you say you're a lawyer  loyal soldier for Trump? And here's the answer. that Don Bacon gave. Hi, Congressman Bacon. Uh,  you recently voted with all Democrats to extend. uh TPS for Haitians for another three years. Um,  over 90% of uh these Haitians entered the country. illegally. And actually, they're legal now. Well,  60% of them they're legal now. They work. They're.

not allowed on welfare unless there's unique  situation like they're married to American. And so, are you part of the no nothing party I was  talking about in the 1850s? No. Like you represent. a minority of the of the country that hates  immigrants. That's not true. Millions of people. are are just concerned about the future of this  nation. They say that you know aliens I see you're. wearing a cross. You ever read the verses in the  New Testament that talk about how you should treat. immigrants? Yeah. I don't think that means just  opening up the the you know country for everyone.

to come here. These people are legal. What do you  don't get about that? They're legal. Okay. illegal. and they're working, they're paying taxes, they're  not even allowed on welfare unless they're unless. they're married to an American or you there's  some out when they get on it. So I just think. you'll have your facts right and you represent  like a 20% core or 20% group that I actually. represent the majority of the MAGA base and I  mean the I I think you're misaligned with the. president on this and many others are concerned  about that as well. Well, I represent the vast. majority. I represent my district and I won my  district. Okay. So, as far as the uh the amnesty.

bill or the dignity dignity dod bill, because  it's actually titled in Spanish, amnesty. So, you are a hardcore anti-immigrant person. Well,  you please start reading the New Testament every. day. Maybe do you well? You just hate immigrants.  You hate immigrants. Notice the immediate. identification of motive, which always it's  always hate. Hate. Hate speech. You're motivated. by hate. You actually have a sincere question.  What's the answer? You hate immigrants. You're.

a bad Christian. Maybe you should read the New  Testament. Jesus calls for open borders. Really, where is that, Congressman Bacon? That would have  been an interesting question to ask. Certainly, the answer would be, "Stop hating." But what's  so interesting is that rather than explain to. that reporter why this is in the best interest of  the United States, he says, "We have to do this or. else we're not Christian and we're haters." So  there is a kind of religious fervor about this.

this desire to change the population of the United  States and to do it quickly. Now on the left, this has been the goal for a very long time.  Fairly famous picture came to light once again. this week from a documentary done in the Southern  Poverty Law Center and it shows taped on the wall. of the SPLC headquarters is a chart handwritten on  the declining percentage of whites in the United. States. That's the goal, of course. Why would that  be the goal? Because the United States remaining.

majority white is for some reason terrifying. So  terrifying and so upsetting that even mentioning. the dem the current demographic mix of the United  States is considered a hate crime. Can't say. that because the reality itself is considered  repugnant. For some people that is dangerous, immoral, and unacceptable, and it must be changed.  That's of course the purpose of this. There's no. plausible economic benefit to continuing temporary  protective status for hundreds of thousands of.

Haitians. Like tell me how that's a win. Maybe  it is. If it is, tell us how. They don't even. bother. Shut up, hater. Because of course, the  true imperative is to change the complexion of. the United States. And the left has been really  clear about this. Joe Biden said it out loud. multiple times. That's a good thing. Nancy Pelosi  said exactly the same thing. But now you have the. neocon wing of the Republican party also saying  that's the goal. What's so interesting is that.

even as they say out loud effectively, our deepest  fear is that the United States will be some kind. of ethnostate with a racial majority that's  white. That's a huge fear. Even as they say that, they demand that Israel remain an ethnostate.  Here's a tweet, and there are many, but here's. just from Don Bacon, the guy you just heard,  calling that poor woman anti-immigrant, a hater, a bad Christian. Here's his definition of support  for Israel. And this is a tweet he sent this fall.

Zionists believe the Jewish people should have a  homeland called Israel, as promised in the Bible. If you don't think Israel should exist as a  Jewish state, then I'd say you're an anti-semite. You're an anti-semite. If you don't think that  Israel is inherently and has a moral right to be. a biblical right to be an ethnostate, not just a  state, a Jewish state. Now, a lot of us are kind.

of agnostic on this question. Israel wants to be  an ethnostate. Fine. Okay. Not my country. Not too. upset about it. feel sorry for the mistreatment,  the murder of Palestinians. But a kind of core. tenant of nationalism is each country gets to  define its purpose and its vision for itself. And. if it's not your country, it's kind of not your  business as long as they're not forcing you to. say pay for it, which they are. But let's say they  weren't. And Israel wants to remain an ethnostate,

fine. It is an ethnostate. Don't know why it's  embarrassing to say that. Don Bacon just said that. you're an anti-semite if you don't want it to be a  Jewish state. Okay, fine. Fair enough. Don't agree. with your definition of anti-semitism, but it's  very important to Don Bacon that Israel remain. an ethnostate and very important to most members  of Congress. They'll tell you this. But it's at. the same time repugnant the idea that the United  States should be an ethnostate. In other words, their number one goal as a policy question is  to keep Israel an ethnostate while preventing. the United States from being one. What is that?  Why are those goals the inverse of one another?

And why are they so important? You would think a  leader of our country be completely agnostic as. to the demographic makeup of Israel. Why does that  matter to us exactly? What effect does that have. on the United States? Why is that our concern?  Again, as long as we don't have to pay for it, your weird apartate system or the murder of your  racial opponents, we shouldn't be paying for that. But as long as we're not, how many members of  Congress are standing up and saying it's really.

important that China remain 95% Honchinese  or it's bad that they remain 95% Honchinese? Members of Congress don't even know what  the ethnic mix of China is. They don't care, but they know a lot about the ethnic mix of the  United States and Western Europe and Canada and. New Zealand and Australia. And they're very  opposed to those countries remaining majority. white. It's one of their main complaints about  Russia. By the way, they fixed that problem in. Ukraine because this war, which has been supported  from day one by the very same neocon lobby that.

got us into the war with Iran, that lobby has  extended this war with US and now European tax. dollars to the point where so many Ukrainian men  have been killed that Budanov, the number two. in the Ukrainian government, just the other day  announced, "We're going to have to import Africans. to live and work here because we don't have enough  men. We're going to have to change the demographic. mix of Ukraine for all time. For all time. We're  going to do what Gangaskhan was unable to do,

which is totally change the composition of  who lives in Ukraine. So Ukraine as a nation, the nation that existed 5 years ago, will cease  to exist. Period. And its farmland will likely. be bought by foreigners because that's now legal  under Zalinski. So you just saw the elimination. of a European country as it existed 5 years  ago. And you saw that not simply because Putin. rolled over the border and invaded sovereign  Ukraine. You saw that because Western elites.

pushed that. That has been their overriding  goal for the past four and a half years. So now you're starting to understand that the goal  is to allow really one ethnostate in the rest and. not allow any others. Now why would that be the  goal? And the truth is no clue. No idea. That is. so weird. Dallas, there is some explanation.  Maybe it's theological or spiritual. It it's.

above my level of understanding. But just noting  the behavior and the public statements of everyone. involved, that's clearly the standard that they're  holding this country and the rest of the world to. One ethnostate and one ethnostate only. And by the  way, only one country with an inherent quote right. to exist. And if you press them, and I have, they  will admit only one country has a right to exist. We may enjoy having certain countries exist, and  if they can defend themselves, they can continue. to exist, but only one country possesses an  inherent right to exist. And that's also the.

only country that has a right to be an ethnostate.  No European country possesses that right. So why. bring this up? Well, because there's no avoiding  it. That's why. Not cuz it's a comfortable topic. Not because the people in charge are going to be  happy to hear it. They won't be. But because you. should know it. We are in a moment of profound  change. Whenever you're staring down the barrel. of global famine, which we are, and the end of  our long-standing system of energy production.

and distribution, which we are, whenever there's  a a real possibility that someone uses nuclear. weapons, which we face, despite whatever they  tell you, that is real. Doesn't mean it's going. to happen. It could happen. You are looking at a  world that is resetting. Big things are changing. Not just little national borders but much more  than that. The collapse of empires, the rise of. others, maybe even more than that. So you should  know the motives of the people involved. And there.

is no topic that reveals motives more clearly than  the question of speech which is the foundation of. freedom in all countries at all times and  is the basis of our system of government. Democracy cannot work unless people are free to  say what they think is true. Because how can you. cast an informed vote if you don't know the facts?  Well, if you're prevented from speaking honestly.

about what you think those facts are, of course,  you can't cast an informed vote and the entire. system falls apart. But it's even deeper than  that. You cannot tell a sovereign human being. what he must say or believe. Period. Because  those rights are inherent. Human beings are. born with the right to say and believe what they  think is true. That right was given them by God, not by government. So if you take it away, you  are by definition treating people as subhuman.

You are telling them you cannot speak because you  don't possess those rights because I consider you. a slave. So this really is the difference between  freedom and slavery. So whenever you hear people. say using whatever pretext they come up with at  the moment you're not allowed to say that you. are watching an attempt by the people in charge to  enslave the people they rule over. And you are and.

it brings great sadness to acknowledge this. You  are watching right now the people that if you're. watching this you may have voted for the president  and the constellation of supporters around him, office holders around him call for censorship.  Now, we're going to begin explaining and showing. that this is true with a clip from someone  you always kind of feel guilty playing these. because it is Mark Levin, after all, who was an  audience in the in the dozens organically, but who. has been pretty reliably used as a mouthpiece for  what's coming next from this administration over.

the past year. He is, we know this because the  president has said it many times, very close to. the president and fully aligned with the president  according to the president's own description. So here is Mark Leavvin's solution to America's  greatest and most pressing problem from his. perspective, which is criticism of the government  of Israel. Here's what we should do about it, says Mark Levin. The violence that is being  preached on different broad broadcast broadcast.

platforms by different politicians largely not  exclusively largely Democrats largely leftists. Marxist Islamist although we have the woke Reich  REIC is horrendous and I believe is really really. uh adding fuel to the fire of hate out there and  making it very very difficult for a free people. to even have a discussion about what they  want or how they want it and so forth. Um,

and so it's not the first time things like this  have happened, but it really is problematic. because so much of it is protected. And you  have people say, "Don't you believe in the. First Amendment?" They don't even know what  the First Amendment believe. Uh, do you want. to deplatform people? You know, the libs do that.  I don't have any problem with deplatforming Nazis. Now, it's hard. It's hard not to laugh at a  Levin clip, but it's not an attack on him, but it's just the irony is so rich. Um, so he  begins by saying that people who criticize the.

government of Israel are espousing violence. Now,  this is coming from a guy who's literally called. pretty recently on the air on Fox News for nuclear  strikes against the government of Iran, who has. relentlessly defended the murder of civilians  by this and the Israeli government. So for. this person to say that opponents of violence are  actually the ones espousing violence is hilarious. uh but on brand because it's of course always  the sin they're committing that they accuse you.

of being guilty of always and everywhere. It's the  perfect inversion which is the hallmark of evil. The evil lie is never 5 degrees from the truth.  It's 180 degrees from the truth. They accuse. you of what they're doing and that's how you know  it's not simply proication. It is a denial of the. existence of truth. But in any case, you see Mark  Levvin saying people who criticize the government. of Israel and that is his and to extent there is  one the official definition of anti-semitism is.

criticism of the government of Israel. The secular  government of Israel which is not supported by all. Jews that's for sure. But no matter criticism  of a foreign government is hate tantamount to. violence is stochastic terrorism, the left might  say. And Mark Levvin, the right-wing MAGA guy, is saying those people should be silenced by the  tech companies. But that's not censorship because.

somehow it's not. Well, that is exactly what  Republicans, including Donald Trump, described as. censorship when the last Democratic administration  did it at scale during CO. That is exactly what. they were talking about when they said the Biden  administration engages in censorship. And they. were right. telling tech companies which are  dependent on federal contracts that they have to. tow a political line is the same as banning speech  because tech companies are the conduits through.

speech flows. So yes, that is censorship legally  and morally. And Mark Leavvin, who has positions. that are shared by only a tiny percentage of the  American population, and this is knowable through. public opinion polling, is telling you that anyone  who disagrees with him must be silenced. But he's. just a weekend host on Fox News. Who cares what  Mark Leven says? Well, as if on Q, Mark Leavvin's.

suggestion on Fox News has now been bolstered  by an actual piece of legislation sponsored by. Josh Gottenheimer, the Democrat from New Jersey,  and amazingly, Republican Magest Stalwart, Mike. Lawler, two of the most floorid and least ashamed  neoons in the United States Congress, introduced. legislation today to compel the tech companies to  ban people who criticize Israel. the government. of Israel because that's hate. And under the  IH definition of anti-semitism, they're right.

The definition that's been encoded in law in the  majority of American states and in 40 countries. around the world, the definition we didn't pay any  attention to because it seemed too dumb and like. who cares? That definition is now the operative  definition and it means that criticizing the. behavior of a foreign government is a hate crime  and can get you censored in your own country.

So what's the takeaway from all this? Well, the  first takeaway is censorship is coming and it. will work unless people exercise their god-given  and first amendment guaranteed right to push back. against it with words and do so at high volume  without any shame at all. It's going to need a. refusal to be intimidated by false claims of  quote hate. And any Republican who voted for. Donald Trump because he was sick of being told  to shut up racist should join this chorus. No,

you're not going to intimidate me into being quiet  about the behavior of a foreign government that. I pay for just because you call it hate. Not  playing that game. Sorry, I voted against this. and I'm going to stand on principle and fight  it now no matter what. That's the first thing. But the second thing to know is that the motive  here is dark. This is not how you would ever treat. people you cared about. This is how you treat  people you hate. People you have contempt for, who you find inconvenient, annoying, whose mere  presence you find grading. You'd rather live.

next to Haitians under temporary protective status  than next to birthright Americans who have these. outmoded expectations of like a job and health  care they can pay for in an emergency room that's. not crowded with people who don't speak English  and I don't know the right to say what they think, the right to complain about their leaders, even  the right to complain about the behavior of a. foreign country that they pay for. You hate people  like that. And there may be other reasons you hate.

them, but you certainly hate them because they are  a reminder of how you have failed. You have not. done a good job running this country. You don't  even care to try. You'd rather run the world or. the empire. You don't want to improve Baltimore.  You don't care about Gary Indiana. Rural America. makes you sick. As Bill Crystal said, all those  coupon clippers and people just barely holding. on. Normal leaders would ask themselves, why are  people mad? What are they dissatisfied with? How.

can I help them? They're clearly in pain. They  should have asked this question when Trump got. elected the first time. Why would you elect an  orange guy who ran casinos in Atlantic City when. there all kinds of great candidates, Jeb Bush  and Ted Cruz, you had a lot to choose from, but you chose Trump? A normal, reflective  person would reach the only conclusion possible, which is because they're dissatisfied with me.  and maybe I need to change and serve their needs. better and listen to them once in a while and not  dismiss them with the back of the hand or charges.

of bad motives or hate or censorship. But they  haven't done that and they haven't even tried. to do that. They've never looked inward once in 10  years and now they've reached the point of maximum. frustration where the biggest thing they've ever  done which is tried to regime change the Iranian. government and it hasn't worked. That's the  biggest thing they've ever done. they staked. everything on that and you should just know that  at this point now that that's not working out. They will not be mad at themselves. They're going  to be mad at you for not liking it or appreciating.

it or for talking about it at all or for holding  on to your outdated expectations about what life. in this country was like then and should be now.  And above all for the insistence that you have as. a voter and an American that the people in charge  should serve you, not just themselves and their. families. your insistence that wait a second this  Epstein thing. What is the Epstein thing? Shut. up. By the way, it's just a few years ago that  Harvard University took the name of Charles Glass.

off a building. Congressman, the GlassSteagall  Act of 1933, half written by Congressman Glass. and took his name off a building. Why? Cuz he was  a racist. And we have to get rid of all racists. on the buildings at Harvard because we're making a  moral statement. Harvard does not tolerate racism. Even retroactively, if we find a racist with a  name on a building at Harvard, we're taking it. off. So pure are our motives. But guess whose  name is still there? Not just on a building,

but on the building at the entrance of the Kennedy  School of Government at Harvard at the entrance, the Lex Wexner building. Les Wexner, the guy who  bankrolled Epstein, whatever Epstein was accused. of, Wexner probably helped pay for it. And his  name is still on the building at Harvard. Now, why is that meaningful? Because it's a humiliation  exercise. It's a really clear statement. Your. ancestors were flawed, disgusting, were taking  their names off, tearing the monuments down.

But Les Wexner, no. It's You may hate it. We don't  care what you think. It's the Less Wexner building. at Harvard. You getting the message now? It's a  middle finger to you. That's hatred. You would. think that just out of politeness, you would  take Wexner's name off the building. You would. think that, right? You would think just out of  like a sense of duty that you might put some.

of the people who run Purdue Pharma in jail at  least for maybe one day just symbolically your. product killed tens of thousands of Americans and  you knew it was doing it. You sold it anyway. No. Not one person, not one day. You'd think like the  heads of the big banks tank the global economy, the global financial crisis. You think like one  of them could go to jail for one day? Nope. Nope. It's your fault. You borrowed too much. So, we  have seen the outline of their contempt for a long.

time. It's not just indifference, it's loathing  and it's aimed at the population. And now it's. coming to a head because war is by definition  crisis and it forces pre-existing trends to the. surface. And you should be prepared for however  this manifests because it's definitely coming. So, there is the coolest movie we can imagine.  It's a new film adaptation of George Orwell's.

amazing novel, Animal Farm. 1984 gets all the  attention, but Animal Farm is better. It's. coming to theaters May 1st. You probably remember  that Animal Farm is not actually about animals. It's about human nature, the desire for authority,  and how quickly people tend to fall in the line. and give up all of their god-given rights.  The movie follows Lucky, a young pig whose. curiosity and courage guide viewers through the  farm's rise and fall. We see hope, betrayal,

and above all, the danger of totalitarian  power. This is a movie to watch with your kids, especially if they're old enough to ask real  questions and to notice when the answers. don't add up. The book affected generations of  American school kids, no longer taught, of course, cuz it's too true. What do you do when the rules  start changing, you're told you're not allowed. to notice? Do you speak up or you just go along  with it because, hey, that's easier. That's the. conversation you should have with your kids about  power, corruption, and freedom. This movie is.

entertaining. It's sharp. Not many studios would  do it at this point, but Angel did because their. guild members voted to bring it to the big screen.  So see it, talk about it, decide for yourself what. it means. Animal Farm theaters May 1st. Tickets  available now at angel.com/tucker. So is there a. connection? Well, there obviously is. What exactly  is the connection between neoonservative politics, the desire to regime change foreign powers despite  the total lack of benefit to the United States and.

the desire to radically change the demographic  mix of the United States and the desire to, I don't know, lend money at high interest or  let any of the festering social problems in. this country go unressed. What is the connection?  You really have to serve in the Congress to know. And Marjorie Taylor Green did for 5 years from  Georgia. Whether you agree with her or not, you'd. have to say one of the most sincere people ever  to serve in the Congress. So sincere that when. she found out that all of it was fake, she left.  We thought it'd be worth asking her what is going.

on here. Ladies and gentlemen, Marjorie Taylor  Green. Congressman, thanks a lot for joining us. So you pretty recently served in in the US House,  so maybe you could answer this question. Why is. it that so many of the members of Congress who  support this war, who supported the Iraq war, who. support every pointless, counterproductive foreign  entanglement, are also the very same people who. were trying to force Americans to take the COVID  shot, who voted to put spyw wear in people's cars,

who are for the castration of children, who ignore  the opioid crisis, and who are for mass migration. Why would neocon politics bring you to a place  where you support all of these other things that. are not connected to foreign policy but that are  also bad for the population of this country? Like. what what's the connector? Well, the obvious uh  first response any any person with common sense.

would say I have no idea why they would ever do  that. Right. Fair. And and then secondly, I think. the question is why do Americans keep voting for  these people? And I I think the responsibility. falls on the voters to get rid of them. But I'll  tell you why they keep voting for those things. Tucker, having served in Congress for 5 years,  what I learned from the inside is there are. very powerful industries and their their lobby um  they're very powerful lobbyist and the financial.

donations and structures that are built behind  them is what entangles these politicians uh into. supporting things that are unimaginable, things  that Americans do not vote for. like you said, um, gender affirming care, transing children, uh,  requiring cars to have AI, big tech technology in. them where they won't start if if the AI deems  that you're not capable of driving. Um, the.

list goes on and on. Voting for FISA 702 without  warrants, warrantless spying on Americans. That's. actually happening. I think they're having a vote  right now on the House floor on the rule to move. forward to do that. I you can't it doesn't make  sense why they support these things, but I can. tell you that it has a lot to do with the power  structure in Washington DC and it supports both. Republicans and Democrats I think it's such a a  good point to make because it's not ideological at.

least in a way that people my age can understand.  There's nothing conservative about allowing the. government to spy on you. There's nothing liberal  about it in a traditional sense either. These are. not liberal, conservative, left, right, even  Republican, Democrat divides. It's almost like. there's a group that's for authoritarian policies  that hurt Americans. And that's kind of what.

connects all of these positions. No, absolutely.  Um they're bought and paid for. they do not. represent the American people or the American  people's interest. Um and and it's because they're. funded that way. Uh take for example, oh my  gosh, this was shocking to me. Um just last week, last week, right? 57 Republicans voted no on an  amendment to stop the government from controlling. your car. Like that what we're talking about, the  AI capability. This was something that Biden and.

the Democrats, they passed a law uh when I was  serving in Congress, of course, I voted no to it. And the law is to require every new car starting  in 2027 to have technology in there to be able to. basically scan you and determine if you're drunk,  if you're if you're capable, if you're if you're. healthy and fit and capable of of driving your  automobile. Um, and the car will not start if if.

AI determines that you're not. Now, 57 Republicans  voted no on a on an amendment to stop that from. happening. And I was shocked. It's your usuals,  you know, um, well, Mike Lawler, Don Bacon, Randy Fine, but I was really surprised to see a  name on the list, a recently elected Republican, Brian Jack from Georgia, who campaigned as being a  conservative. I know his district really well. It.

was just to the south of my old district. these  people don't support that. But yet his name was. on there and the question is how how did he fall  into that trap and why in the world would he vote. no on an amendment to to stop the government from  basically controlling your vehicle? But this is. they get pulled in and it it all happens through  fundraising and um I it's the most unreal thing. I've ever seen in my life. So, back to that, and  the only I guess the only thing I would quibble.

with in your description is the term your vehicle.  If the government can turn it off, it's not your. vehicle anymore. They just took your vehicle from  you. It's not yours. You don't have control over. it despite the fact you pay for it and keep  up with the insurance and the maintenance. Um, but to this question of the member from your  delegation, the Georgia delegation, who just got. elected as a quote conservative, presumably for  civil liberties and freedom and the constitution, like how specifically do you think someone like  that could wind up casting a vote this obviously.

authoritarian, this obviously in contradiction to  his own stated values? Like what was the process. that got him there? Do you imagine? Climbing  the leadership ladder. uh wanting to basically. be the chairman of the NRCC, wanting to be fully  integrated and in charge of all fundraising for. the House GOP. That's that's probably what pulled  him in. Um Brian Jack, who I actually campaigned. for, I endorsed him because I believed he would  be America first. Um so I was really shocked.

to see his name on this list. Actually, actually  really disgusted with it. Um I'm I'm very unhappy. that his name is on this list. makes me regret  endorsing him. Um, I bet. Yeah, for sure. But he. his history is he was in uh on the political side  for the president in the first administration, which means he worked with all the candidates  and and all the donors. Um, then he was on the. polit he worked on the political operation for  former speaker Kevin McCarthy uh when he was.

the minority leader and then became speaker  of the house. Um, so he's very donor driven, big donor-driven Washington DC donors, donors that  require government contracts, donors um, that are. going to basically keep the big industries propped  up and going. And so that's what would pull uh, a Republican that that campaigned on being America  first, campaigned on being MAGA, campaigned on, you know, being a conservative. Uh it's all  the it's the donarddriven money that happens.

behind the scenes that pulls a Republican over  to that side. And when I say Republican driven, it's power. It's it's it's just sheer power.  In Washington DC, a member of Congress can get. can fully fill their campaign coffers with  just a few uh uh fundraisers in Washington. DC where you have the industry giants there say  whether it's the militaryindustrial um complex.

the base there those companies um whether it's  uh pharmaceutical companies big tech companies. um you name it any industry that that is trying to  get this candidate to support the things that they. desperately need to empower them, empower their  companies, help their companies become richer and. richer and richer and dominate in their industry.  They'll show these executives will show up with. their wives. Um, and they'll have 10 to 20, maybe  30 of them there, and they're writing max checks,

max checks from on behalf of themselves,  max checks on behalf of their wives, and. they will be there supporting this um, Republican  member of Congress that needs to get reelected, and they can make hundreds of thousands  of dollars, up to a million dollars like. that on just a few of those fundraisers. And so  these Republicans that are flying back and forth.

to Washington DC every week, they're away from  their family, they're away from their friends, they're away from the people that elected them,  which makes them forget what's important. Uh they. get really lazy and it gets easy to just have  a couple of fundraisers where you're getting. drunk on cocktails and eating little weenies on a  stick or whatever they're serving up there in the. Capitol Hill Club. And th this is how they'll make  all that money. And it's a lot easier than having. to go back to your district, face your district,  have personal meetings with the the donors and.

the good people that live in your district. It's a  lot easier just to just to depend on those little. fundraisers and hang around with the lobbyists  and the people in Washington that you're seeing. every single week than it is to go back home  and say, "Hey, you guys, I got to get reelected. Can you support my campaign? I'd appreciate  pitching in $50 or $100 or if you're capable, a max donation would be great. You know, I've got  to get reelected to keep representing you. And so. that's how they they some of the ones that have  good intentions. That's how they fall into it.

But Tucker, there's a whole other side. There  are Republican members of Congress that never. had good intentions ever. Yeah. Ever. and they  came into the House of Representatives already. completely supported and propped up and funded  by this nasty entanglement I'm talking about in. Washington. And I watched it with my own eyes  when I watched Mike Lawler get elected. Cost.

of living is already making it hard to live here  and it's not getting any better. Unfortunately, it's likely to get worse. And a lot of Americans  fill the gap with credit cards, not just for fancy. dinners, but to cover things like groceries and  bills. That is a disaster. It's understandable, but don't go down that road because there is a tax  in effect, a survival tax of 20% interest or more. Why would you do that? Why would you hand money  to the big banks when you could keep it for your. family? Our friends at American Financing have a  better way. If you're looking to buy your first.

home or refinance your current one, they're  helping Americans achieve the dream of home. ownership with monthly mortgage rates currently in  the fives. American Financing saves its customers. an average of 800 bucks per month. That's nearly  10 grand every year back to you. This isn't just. a loan. It's a total financial reset. So, debt  is tough, but there's a smart way to do it and. a reckless, self-destructive way to do it.  Credit cards. And so, we recommend American.

Financing. They're salary based, not commission  based, which means they actually work for you, not the banks. They're called America's Home  for Home Loans for a reason. Call 8006855696. 800685-55696. or visit americanfinancing.net/tucker. So Mike Lawler is kind and Don Bacon is  another name you mentioned a minute ago, but is kind of a metaphor for the corruption in  the system, it would seem to me. So Mike Lawler.

obviously is way out there on pointless wars,  neocon politics, loyalty to Israel, um almost. to a cartoonish point, but he's also leading the  charge on every other antihuman initiative that. comes out of the United States Congress. Anything  that's bad for the public, he's for. Anything that. might help the public, he ignores. Like, what is  that? Who what is his motive? Do you understand? I'll go back to when he when he was a candidate  uh for Congress. I was already serving in the.

House and um in our conference meetings in our  GOP conference meetings, the ones that we have. at the Capitol Hill, we have two different type of  conference meetings each week. There's one meeting. a week and it's kind of sad that your Republican  representatives only meet one time a week, but once a week and one is either political  and that one happens inside the capital and. then there's another kind that's completely and  totally campaign and fundraising related. That.

one happens off-campus at the Capitol Hill Club.  And um they bring in candidates. They'll bring in, you know, any new candidate running for  Congress. That of course is only approved. by the NRCC and approved by the traditional  establishment Republican party in Washington. So, they will bring in these candidates into  this GOP meeting. They'll have them stand up, raise their hand, introduce themselves. uh the  speaker or who or the leader, whoever is talking.

will praise them and explain to everyone in the  room why they've got to write them a max check. immediately and help get them elected because  they're fighting to become part of the team. So, I remember specifically when Michael Lawler came  in and um he was welcomed in by everybody. I mean, he was propped up as the guy we have to fight  for. One of the most critical races as an incoming. Republican candidate because it was a very close  district and it was so we were told it was so.

important to win this district. Well, I learned  a lot about him very quickly. He as a Catholic, Mike Lawler as a Catholic, was heavily supported  and funded by um the Jewish community there and. was heavily being supported by all the Christian  Zionist. And he instantly had more support from. pretty much every fundraising mechanism that there  is in Washington DC that supports Republicans. He.

had more help than I could have ever dreamed  of having ever in my entire political career. And I was like, "Wow, what is going on with this  guy?" And it it turns out uh he did win his race. It was it was a narrow victory, but he did win it.  And of course, he was in he instantly came into. the House of Representatives completely bought and  paid for by all of the establishment donor class. that had supported him. He hated Donald Trump,  made fun of him constantly, mimicked him, making.

fun of his voice. He used to attack me, make fun  of me, come and find me on the House floor and. make fun of me for supporting Donald Trump. And  this was this was in the four years before Trump. got elected as president again in 2024. And um he  was I was just like, this guy's like literally one. of the wor well, I would say he's the worst, but  Randy Fine is really the worst. But Mike Lawler.

was unbelievably I I thought he was a Democrat.  I was like, he's literally a Democrat. He's so. against all the things that Republican voters care  about and he clearly hates Donald Trump. Well, I saw this unbelievable change in him. And  of course, it happened after Trump won his. primary in 2024. All of a sudden, Mike Lawler,  I started joking. I started calling him MAGA. Mike Lawler because he was all of a sudden like  becoming Trump's biggest supporter and he was all.

excited. He got a MAGA hat signed by Donald Trump.  Came straight up to me to show it to me. And I'll. never forget the day that he had gone and met with  the the president at the White House. Of course, I. was not invited. Only this new all the Republicans  that hated the president before. Let me tell you, Tucker, it all changed when Trump went in the  White House. Literally, in a matter of months, those of us that fought for him, fought for him  when no one else would, who were the basically.

like the inner circle, we all of a sudden got  kicked out. And it was the Republicans like Mike. Lawler and all these other guys that were the ones  being constantly ushered into the White House for. meetings and all kinds of things. So, he came  back on the House floor one day and he had one. of Trump's gigantic um challenge coins that's  like big and gold and obnoxious and heavy and. um he came up and he was like, "I've got one of  these, Marjorie. Do you have one of these?" And he.

was all bragging about it. But you know what that  told me, Tucker, is what I really reflecting on. it now that I didn't really realize at that time  was that the president, not only had was Michael. Lawler fully bought and paid for by this and Don  Bacon and all these other guys fully bought and. paid for by the political industrial complex that  maintains the power structure in Washington that. is completely America last. But the fact that they  were the ones now first on the list to go to the.

White House and the ones being courted all the  time, that meant that that's when the president. also became bought and paid for by the exact same  group of people, powerful people, powerful donor. class, and the powerful industries. So the reason  Mike Lawler was unusual even in the Congress was. he was such a sla slavish servant of Israel from  his very first public statements. Everything was.

about Israel. Um he comes from a district with a  lot of problems. I didn't read a single solution. to any of those problems he was proposing, but  it was always about Israel. Would you say that. the group that hated Trump and then early in  the term got invitations to the White House, were they all servants of Israel? Yeah. Oh, 100%.  They Are you kidding me, Tucker? When I introduced. an amendment to defund Israel just last year,  this was It hasn't even been a year yet. Only five.

other members of Congress, five out of 435, only  five voted with me to defund American taxpayer. dollars going to Israel. So that's your count if  you want to know how many members of Congress on. both sides of the aisle are completely beholdened  to funding Israel. No matter what they do, no.

matter how much genocide they commit, no matter h  how many Lebanon Christian villages they destroy, no matter which country they decide to bomb out  of their madness and and desire for destruction, there's only it it was only five. It  total six of us. There were six of us, including myself. That's your count. I I  assume Massie was one of those. Of course, Thomas Massie was one. Of course. Yeah,  he's not bought and paid for his race.

None of the other ones really matter.  I don't want to get too sidetracked, but I just since you you mentioned his  race, where uh is that race now? It it. is tightened. Um he's still in the lead, but it's  definitely tightened. I've seen different polling. It's it's got him anywhere of approximately 5 to  seven points ahead of this guy named Ed Galrin, who by the way, Ed Galrin won't even  show up to debate Thomas Massie. Like,

that's one of it's like campaign 101. If you're  running for Congress, you should be able to. show up to a debate in your district in front of  the people that that you're wanting to vote for. you. And you should be able to show up in person  and stand in front of a microphone and a camera. against your opponent and address address why you  will be a better representative than the current. representative Thomas Massie. And Ed Galin has not  shown up to a single one. As far as my knowledge,

he hasn't shown up at all. And by the way, he's  completely funded by three Zionist billionaires, 100% funded, that have given tens of millions of  dollars, and they don't even live in his district. They couldn't relate to Kentucky that they only  know about Tel Aviv. It's the most unbelievable. thing I've ever seen happen. And Chris Losa  is the guy that's running the race because he,

of course, Chris Lassevita, he's he who does he  work for? Lindsey Graham, John Cornin, some of. the worst Republicans, and he's doing everything  he can, aligning himself with these three Zionist. billionaires to defeat Thomas Massie. What?  Why? And and who is Chris, for people who. don't follow this stuff, who is Chris Losa? Chris  Oivvita is a big fat political consultant that is. richer beyond his wildest dreams and beyond your  wildest dreams because he sucks in donor money.

so that he can put TV ads and and and mail so  he can run campaigns basically that elect the. very people that you hate. You absolutely hate the  candidates that he supports like Lindsey Graham, like Ed Grin. He supports the candidates that that  are completely funded and controlled by the very. political Washington political establishment  that we're talking about that that owns Mike.

Lawler that owns Don Bacon that owns Maria  Salazar, Carlos Gimenez, Mario Diaz Bolard, the list goes on and on. I guess apparently just  bought Brian Jack with his vote to take away. control of your car that you pay for. But but this  is that is exactly who Chris Lassita works for. Chris Lassivvita also works for President Trump.  Chris Lassivita used to hate President Trump, but. he wiggled himself in there. Um just slimed his  way in and now he's he's frequently at the White.

House practically every single day. He ran the  president's 2024 campaign alongside Susie Wilds. and um he is the guy that's trying to beat Thomas  Massie. Yep. So, it does seem like just from an. outside perspective, it seems like the more you  exhibit loyalty to Israel, the closer you are to. the White House political operation. 100%. You you  well Tucker, I'm no longer in Congress because I.

did not I did not bow in obedience to Apac and  to the Zionist uh that control literally fully. control Washington DC. Um I I wouldn't take any  of their money. I I voted to defund American tax. dollars going to Israel. Um, I voted to release  the Epstein files, which is linked to Israel. And.

so, yeah, you you you have a hard time existing  or fighting for your political career if if you. aren't part of that. As a gun owner, you know the  dilemma. You want to be prepared for breakins or. any moment where you might need a firearm, but  you also need to keep those firearms secure, out of the hands of kids, for example. So for  years that meant choosing between a gun safe. that takes a long time to open, pretty impossible  in an emergency, or leaving something accessible. but unsafe. And neither option is a good option.  And that's why we are thrilled to partner with.

Stopbox. We're not exaggerating when we say  that using Stopbox changes everything. Here's. what makes it different. The Stopbox  Pro is completely mechanical. No keys, no batteries. It does not fail. It's got five  buttons designed for muscle memory. This is one. that we keep here in the studio. You program  your own code, practice it a couple of times, and your fingers remember it. And that means  you get immediate access to your firearm when. you need it, and everyone else can't get it. And  here's something else. It is TSA compliant. You.

can check your firearm safely and legally when you  fly. No drama at the airport. Plus, it's made in. the United States. No tariffs. Real American jobs  and quality you can trust. And that we do trust. Stopbox offers a range of products designed to  make for an array of needs. Take the new Stopbox. UKAN, which uses the same mechanical system as  the Pro, but is a much bigger storage capacity, room for guns, ammo, targets, everything you  want. For a limited time, our listeners get 10%.

off using the code Tucker at checkout. Visit  stopboxusa.com. Use the code Tucker for 10%. off your whole order. Now, if you purchase, feel  free to mention you heard about it right here on. the show. What do you So my understanding of Trump  and I talked to him a lot as you have uh was that. you know Trump supported Israel in the same sense  that I always supported Israel, you always support. Israel. Like hey Israel it's great you know not  against Israel. It's not the thing I think about. all day not Josh Hammer or anything but like I'm  not against it. And Trump seemed to have a kind.

of I don't know sensible view of Israel. And then  at a certain point in the last year and a half, everything became about Israel. And that was the  measure that Trump and his political team used to. decide who was an ally and who's an enemy. When  did that change? Am I imagining this? I mean, that's my perception of it. Anyway, tell me  yours. I I agree with you. It did change. And.

just to be clear, we're talking about the secular  government of Israel and the government of Israel. Exactly. and the donors that that fully fund  it. Um, not only fund uh anything that supports. the secular government of Israel, but they also do  anything that that funds the IDF and the wars that. they fight. Um, so to be clear, that's what we're  talking about. Of course, we're not talking about. Jewish people. This isn't about anti-semitism,  but it he did change over time. And I'll be I'll.

be really clear. This is something that is my  own conclusion. Uh to become president of the. United States, there's deals that have to be made  otherwise you aren't allowed to have that power. And you can go president by president throughout  time and especially throughout our lifetimes and. you can look at every single president and look  at their career and the decisions that they made. and you can very quickly see that they made their  deal to support Israel at all times. Why does the.

United States of America do that for for one  foreign country? It makes absolutely no sense. We don't do that for any other foreign country. No  other government on earth does every single United. States president. The vast majority of members  of Congress completely pledge their allegiance. Governors too, we have to include governors and  state- elected officials. Um they they pledge.

their complete allegiance to the government of  Israel and their purpose and their protection and. whatever endeavor they decide to pursue, whether  it's right or wrong, whether it's it helps America. or even if it hurts America, they still pledge  their full allegiance. They make that deal. and. Tucker. Um, I don't care what anybody thinks about  me, but I believe that Trump had to make a deal. like this in order to become president. And that's  why people see the drastic change in him. Um,

now he was beholdened to a lot of the estab  establishment Washington industries and their. donors in his first administration. that happened  and we can look at COVID and hit the response. Uh. shutting down the entire country uh to slow  the spread of a virus was absolutely serving. that that gigantic machine. It wasn't for the  American people. That did not help Americans.

It did not help American small business owners.  It hurt us. It hurt children's education. I mean, that's a whole another subject. But he did  that. Trump did that in his first term. However, this term we've watched him drastically  change literally from the first quarter of his. presidency to being completely um basically held  captive in servitude to whatever BB Netanyahu.

demands of him. That's fighting wars. That's  that's creating policy um that benefits Israel. And that is even to the point of defeating a House  Republican that votes with him over 90% of the. time, defeating Thomas Massie because those giant  billionaire Israel donors say it has to happen. And um it's I don't know how that I don't know  how and why and I don't know how you change that.

and I don't know how this came to be but I think  it happened over decades and it's a it's a much. bigger problem than people realize. It's not  it's not anti-semitic for us to talk about it. It doesn't mean that we're against Jewish people.  Not at all. We love all people. We're Christians. We're commanded to love all people. Um, but our  government, the United States of America, should. be serving the American people and the American  people's interest first and foremost at all times,

100%. and should not be easily dragged off into  bombing Iran or paying to fund uh all types of. military equipment and weapons to to perform  genocide on Gaza or or Christians in Lebanon. and villages in Lebanon and taking their land. The  hypocrisy of it is is beyond it's unspeakable. The. king of England, King Charles, spoke to Congress  this week and literally demanded that the United.

States of America go to war with Russia because  Russia invaded Ukraine, which is absurd. Yet, no. one is demanding the United States stop supporting  Israel as they have literally and are at this. moment doing the same thing to Lebanon. And it's  not anti-Semitic to say why is that happening? This shouldn't be happening. why the hypocrisy.  Uh the masses about him members of Congress stood.

up and applauded King Charles when he demanded  that. And I myself watched that and I said, "Well, I know I know for a fact because I've been there.  I know the things said in speeches to Congress. publicly because that's what that foreign leader  is is asking of Congress. Those same conversations. happen privately at the White House. And it would  be really naive for anyone to think that King. Charles is not talking to Donald Trump about going  to war with Russia because of the Ukraine Russia.

war. And um that that that concerns me. It's just  interesting that you so you think of uh donors. to the Republican party and Democratic party, I  should say, who are pretty single-mindedly focused. on the fortunes of Israel and they they want  foreign aid. They want a defense guarantee. They. want the United States military to protect Israel  as it continues its expansion in the Middle East,

etc., etc. And that's all true. But that same  set of donors, and this is the part that does. confuse me, has also the group that forced the  Biden administration to fund the Ukraine war, that has prevented this administration from ending  or really even working to end the Ukraine war. This is also the very same group that has pushed  open borders and has convinced the president to. change his long-standing and often stated view on  immigration. So, he got elected in 2016 promising.

to build a wall. Never really well didn't build a  wall. Didn't really try very hard to build a wall. and now is saying, "Well, actually, I'm not  going to deport a lot of people. We're going. to make them citizens." Yep. We're going to  we're going to start the process of, you know, immigration reform, how whatever phrase they're  using. But Trump is now pro-immigration, which. is an amazing change once again at the behest  of these donors. These are the same people who. have pushed open borders in Europe, who've abetted  the refugee migration from Syria and Africa into.

Western Europe and then complained about it. Why  is that? Like why would people who support Israel. also be for changing the demographic mix of the  United States? That doesn't make sense. Well, true. It is true. And it's it's happened for it's  happened for many years now. Our demographics. have been drastically changing. That happens  through our border through open border policies.

of administrations and administrations that refuse  to enforce our laws. We have laws. People can be. deported. It's just the fact that they haven't  fully supported them and enforce those laws. So there's absolutely no reason, for example, for  for approximately 10 or 11 Republicans to vote. with the Democrats to pass a bill um this happened  just this month to extend the temporary protection. status of 350,000 Haitians. Now, you have to  ask yourself, like I think people that watch.

Fox News all day will go, "Oh, those typical  bad old rhinos." and they'll be mad and go, "Why did they do that?" But what really happens  behind the scenes is these powerful lobbies and. these powerful groups who are basically businesses  that are that run off of government contracts. They run off of grants they receive. They run off  the you can call open borders an industry. It is.

a huge powerful industry. It's an industry of all  types of charities and nonprofits and nos that are. everything from people that give uh someone that  comes across the border a backpack or say like. Haitian uh Haitians that have to be protected  here in America and are are allowed to live. here and work for free um even though they're  not citizens but they're protected. Um this is. an entire industry. It's it it's it's people that  serve all of that in every capacity. Even lawyers,

American lawyers that help these people through  the so-called immigration process or really to. stay in America against our laws. Now, why is that  happening? I it's I think it's a very I think the. answer is really dark. It it weakens our country.  Anytime you change the demographics of a country, you drastically change the people there, which  radically changes the views of the people because.

you have such a vast variety of all types of  people with all types of belief systems and all. types of opinions. Now, when you fill a country  with millions of people that are dependent on the. government because the government let them in,  they weren't born here. they they came across. the border and then they may have been protected  like dreamers like Obama protected the dreamers or. you say the Haitians 350,000 of them that um  I couldn't believe it Rich McCormack another.

Republican member of Congress who is from my state  who I personally know voted to protect 350,000. Haitians. It doesn't make sense. Like why would  he do that? But they do it to weaken our country. because when you weaken the country, you weaken  the people and you weaken the the voting basically. the votes because eventually these people  get status and eventually they become voters.

as well. Then you train change the trajectory of  the country and you also change the focus of the. government. So let's take there's there's members  of Congress that have dual citizenships. They. they are they are there for the interest of the  country they came from. They are there serving a a. uh foreign uh group of people that is in their  district and they are beholden to them and that.

means that they are not voting for who would be  original American citizens which I think is a. problem. Um, and I don't it's it's very hard to  change, but it's I I don't know how we got here, Tucker. It's just it's it's obviously very deep  whatever's happening because it doesn't on the. surface make any sense. So, here you have people  like Michael Lawler or Don Bacon and there are a. bunch of them as you know. Yeah. who are wholly  focused on preserving the state of Israel as an.

ethnost state, as a state in which citizenship  is really determined by your ethnicity. Okay, I'm kind of agnostic on that. It's not my country.  But they're very focused on that. Israel has a. right to exist as an ethnostate. And at the same  time, their greatest fear in the United States is. that the US will be an ethnostate. And so we need  to prevent that by changing the demographic mix. Right? That doesn't make any sense at all. Like  that just doesn't tell me what that adds up to.

But it's very obvious as you watch that those  are their twin priorities. Preserve Israel as. an ethnostate. Prevent the United States from  being an ethnostate. What are we watching? I. don't know. I was I just looked at the list  of the Republicans that voted uh to protect. Haitians. And so it's pretty interesting to  me. Fitzpatrick Lawler Bacon, Maria Salazar, Carlos Gimenez, Nicole Malotakus, Rich McCormack,  Mike Turner, who's not running for Congress again,

Mike Kerry, and Mario Diaz Bolard. There's several  names on there. Salazar Gimenez, Diaz Bolard, that fight the hardest uh fight the hardest for  anyone that's come across the border. I mean, they literally want to just make them citizens.  give just give it to them for free. Maria Salazar. for sure has a bill that she's trying to do that  but ironically that same group the same group that.

I just read is also completely completely and you  can add we need to add more in there. I think the. bigger list is the 57 Republicans that voted  no on stopping the government from controlling. your car. I think that's the more expanded list.  You could expand it even bigger than that. Those. are the Republicans that will vote for Israel to  have anything and everything. Like they they fully. agree with Lindsey Graham when he's melting down  on television about we have to we have to give.

money to Israel. We I mean when when Mark when  uh Levvin is demanding that we use nuclear bombs. on Iran, many of these same House Republicans  would support that. I don't know what that is, Tucker, and I don't know why it's that way. Um, I  think there's been a brainwashing that's happened. in this country and it's happened a lot through  evangelical churches. It's happened a lot through. just a lot of churches honestly. And the message  has been told to the American people over and over.

and over and over again that we have to support  Israel at all costs at all times no matter what. And um there's, you know, tragic events that have  helped shaped many Americans views to support. that, such as 911 and such as other horrific  uh terrorist um incidences here in America, but also what we've been fed on the television  of suicide bombers in Israel and so forth.

They don't ever show the other side of what  happened, but they show that non-stop. Now, so that has hardened many Americans to believe  that America has to support Israel at all costs, no matter what. Um, it they use the verse  in Genesis, uh, use that against Americans, Christian or not, to believe that if you  don't bless Israel, then you're going to. be cursed by God. And that's absolutely not  true. And you've talked about that a lot, thankfully, as well as others did. But  it's it has been a basically propaganda.

and messaging that has been told to Americans  for so long. And the baby boomers who we love, that's our parents generation. Um, and not all  of them. There's some really good baby boomers, but the baby boomer generation as a whole is  are the ones that have embraced it the most on. Republican and the Democrat side. Both sides fully  supporting Israel. Give them all your money. you.

know, the best way we can help our grandchildren's  future. They may be broke and can't have a job and. can't afford health insurance and can't afford to  do anything in life. And AI will totally replace. their future jobs, but you know what? We got to  stop Iran from having a nuclear weapon. And it's. been that propaganda that has not only basically  wrangled in these members of Congress and other.

elected officials that are fully supported by the  those lo that lobby and the the massive donor list. that comes with it. It's huge. You have no idea  how big it is. Jews and Christians. It's it's. the Apac umbrella, but it's much bigger than  Apac itself. lots of donors that hey will will. write you a check and say you just make sure  that you take care of Israel and so they are. wrapped in and beholdened by that money and it's  supported by Americans who have been brainwashed.

to believe that that's exactly what America has  to do but nobody ever talks about Tucker nobody. ever talks about the fact that Israel has nuclear  weapons has hundreds of nuclear weapons like who's. really going to mess with Israel at the end of  the day they have nuclear weapons. It's just like, do you ever see anybody freaking out about Kim  Jong-un anymore and North Korea? No. No. Because. he has nuclear weapons. So, what a lie it is  that we really have to support Israel. I have.

for years noticed that there are people who truly  love Israel. It's never bothered me. People love, I don't know, model trains or kite surfing or  what. People love a lot of things. I don't feel. threatened by it. You're allowed to love whatever  you want as far as I'm concerned. In the case of. loving Israel, however, for American leaders,  some Jewish, mostly not Jewish, it's the same. principle. It seems like that love for Israel is  accompanied by contempt for the United States,

maybe even hatred for the United States. What is  it? Maybe it's impossible to serve two masters. Maybe you always wind up hating one of them. I  maybe that that's a biblical principle. Maybe. that's true. I really don't know the answer. But  among that group that we're talking about and that. you served with, did you ever have conversations  offline where they said, you know, we've got. to do something about, I don't know, health  insurance prices or opioid ODS or, I don't know, the elimination of our kids employment future  by AI or any of the truly pressing, in fact,

ominous problems this country faces. Did they  ever talk about that stuff in private? Most I just. laugh. Um most most Republicans if they had a bill  they were trying to get me to co-sponsor. It's. it's kind of it's it's such a circus on the House  floor. So when we're at votes and we're spending. a lot of time on the House floor and and you're  in there and it's everybody in there together, Republicans and Democrats, and everyone's sitting  in the brown leather chairs that I don't know how.

old those chairs are, and we're voting with  our little voting cards and the little machine. with the green yes and the red no and the yellow  present. Um you're sitting there and there's a lot. of co-mingling going on. You know, a lot of that's  where if you're not in a meeting once a week, that's kind of where you see everybody. So,  um, different Republicans and members will go. around with a card and they're asking for people  to co-sponsor their bill that may be supporting,

um, it's usually something that helps the  the medical industry or the or pharmaceutical. industry or they're or it's maybe something very  district specific. Um, sometimes that will be. something they're working on. But did I ever see  anybody going around like really fighting hard. to focus on direct American issues? No. A lot of  times not. And a lot of times it was, hey, we're.

going to have a resolution this week denouncing  anti-semitism um because there were protests. on college campuses because college kids were  saying there was genocide in Gaza. um you know, they would be asking for support to get some some  bill passed through that would provide funding for. some big company that is in their district or has  been lobbying lobbying Washington because whatever. whatever provision is in the next um defense  budget will really help them. Ridiculous things.

like that. No, Tucker, it wasn't something I I  came across this one too. I wanted to tell you. um here here's a here's how America last it has  been it it really is um so they renamed remember. Trump came in and they renamed the department of  defense to the department of war that has cost. uh the Pentagon has estimated that it's cost  approximately $52 million just to rename the.

department of defense to the department of war.  That's the kind of stuff that a lot of Republicans. will come around and say, "Hey, we got to we got  to get behind the team and get this done." But do. they ever come in? And I I had a hard time. I had  a bill and it passed, Protect Children's Innocence. Act. It was it was the one bill that I pushed  so hard with everyone. and Protect Children's. Innocence Act makes it a felony to perform uh  transgender surgeries and hormone blockers and.

all kinds of drugs on children. It's not adults.  It's not some sick man that wants to get a boob. job. We're talking about kids. And I constantly  would go around and ask for their support. Well, I have to tell this story because it just has  to be told. My last vote in Congress, literally. my last vote on the House floor, December 17th,  was my own bill. It finally I had to fight with. everybody to get that bill to the floor. I mean,  I threatened I withheld votes on funding. I fought.

them all and it finally got there. And to my  complete shock, four Republicans voted no. Four. And that was Brian Fitzpatrick, Mike Lawler, Mike  Kennedy, and Gabe Evans. So Mike Lawler voted no. to my bill because he wants kids to he wants your  kids to be trans. Basically, it's totally fine.

with him if your child goes to a school where a  teacher indoctrinates them. It's totally fine with. him if they get indoctrinated on the internet and  they get brainwashed and confused and maybe live. in California or some other blue state where they  can go to a doctor and and basically a teenage. girl could end up getting a masectomy. Michael  Lawler is totally fine with that. He voted no. My bill simply made it a felony to do that to  children. He voted no to that and so did three. other Republicans. The craziest thing happened,  Tucker, this is this was the miracle I witnessed.

because God God performs miracles. And this is why  I believe even though nothing makes sense right. now, I believe in my heart, I have full faith in  God that God can change it if we are willing to. fight for it. My bill passed. My bill passed that  in the House because God moved three Democrats. to vote for it. Four Republicans voted against it  even though the entire Republican party campaigned.

on stopping the trans agenda on children and it  was supported by 70% of Americans. When God knew. those four Republicans were voting no, God moved  three Democrats to vote for it and my bill passed. the House floor. Protect Children's Innocence Act  was also sponsored by our great vice president JB. Vance when he was a senator. He was the original  sponsor of that bill in the Senate. He is now.

the leader of the Senate. So I can tell you that  right now Republicans have the full capability of. passing that bill in the Senate and President  Trump would sign it into law because it's a. direct reflection on his own executive order.  And soon the leader in the Senate has my bill, Protect Children's Innocence Act, that makes it  a felony to trans a kid is sitting on a shelf in.

the Senate. And our vice president hasn't gone in  there and fought with him to, hey, let's get this. to the floor for a vote. Let's whip our senators  because this was a campaign promise in 2024. You see, when people refuse, when good men refuse  to do, when they do nothing, that's when evil. prevails. And that is literally where we are. We  are at a point in history, well, where all types. of evil is prevailing. Nothing makes sense. Those  that are the worst people are the most powerful.

people right now. Those that are committing crimes  and corruption are making all the money right now. And it's because we have a completely speckless  Republican party that is 100% owned and sold out. to a foreign country and a foreign country's lobby  and a foreign country's donors. And that is why. everything insane is happening. That's why nothing  makes sense. It would be interesting to know why.

it's so important to Paul Singer that we continue  to neuter children. Um I I don't know the answer. It clearly is so important um that he and donors  like him are preventing uh this from being banned. I mean, it's it's insane. Um okay, so you painted  a pretty grim, very grim picture of the state of. Washington right now and how far the concerns  of lawmakers and the executive are from voters.

I don't it doesn't feel like this can continue  indefinitely because it's just it's too screwed up. and it it feels like it's radicalizing people in  a way that's scary. So what is the solution? Where. does it go from the midterms this fall to 2028?  What what happens that makes this system more. representative slightly more representative of the  public, do you think? Well, I think that's a great.

question and we can break it down. I was told uh  reliably told by one of the um most well-known. pollsters in Washington DC that Republicans are  expecting to lose anywhere between 20 and 40 seats. in the House. And I Yeah. And I say rightfully  so. They deserve it. They 100% deserve it. They. definitely deserve it. Does the public deserve it?  I don't know. But they party definitely deserves. it. Yeah, for sure. Let's look at the current  situation. The Democrats completely completely.

destroyed so many things and America basically  gave them a very strong message in November of. 2024 that they refused to support wokeness, DEI,  the Green New Deal, the trans agenda. They they. found all of that disgusting. Uh the American  people were sick of censorship. So many people. had been kicked off social media because the  Biden administration had pushed that. Um the. American people, one of their loudest message  was no more foreign wars. It was so simple. Um.

so let's look at what the current system we have.  The the failures of the Democrat and Republican. party is why people like me supported Donald  Trump. Total and utter failures of both parties. They're both disgusting and repulsive. They they  function as one weird uni party in so many ways, but at the same time, the things both  parties represent uh through their actions, I'm not saying what they say on the campaign  trail, through their actual actions, their vote,

the legislation, and the things they fund are  disgusting and they don't represent America at. all, either party. It shocked me that Democrats,  after losing so badly in 2024, that their entire. party didn't go into a room and really have a  serious talk amongst themselves and go, "We've. got to change our ways. We've got to change some  of our serious uh policies. We need to, you know, things they need to back off of. They should have  learned their lesson on their failures, but they.

didn't. They changed nothing. And so now they're  expecting to win the midterms basically on Trump. derangement syndrome, which is the same thing  that they have been campaigning on for years. They're also planning to win the midterms based  on the pathetic utter failures of the Republican. party. But because the Republican party is just  as gross and disgusting as the Democrat party, look at the Republican party. They learned  nothing. Tucker, we gave them the strongest.

message that can be sent. It was a mandate in  2024. The mandate was no more foreign wars and. put Americans first. And the Republican party did  nothing. What they did is they came in and they. use the same system that swings like a pendulum  back and forth between whoever's in charge and. they brought that big powerful lobby and their  donors and their industries. And they basically. swallowed Donald Trump whole and made sure that  he was completely owned and controlled by the.

government of Israel and whatever war they want to  fight. So where does that leave us going forward? My hopes is when I resigned from Congress, I  wanted the American people to understand something. that me leaving doesn't leave them in any worse  position. They are already in the worst position. Me leaving doesn't mean that no one's there  fighting for them. It means that even when I. was there fighting as hard as I possibly could,  I could stop nothing. But it's really up to the.

American people to change it. Now, here's  where the American people have a job to do. It's the American people that keep reelecting  the Lindsey Grahams and the Mike Lawers and all. the disgusting people that that most Republican  voters say they hate, but yet somehow they keep. voting for them. I think they should change that.  Another thing is, look, I don't want Democrats to. win because I don't support their policies  either. But why am I afraid of Republicans. losing? I'm not. I resigned from Congress because  I refuse to be a part of and I refuse to support.

a party that lied to the American people and is  completely selling them out. And I think that's. what American voters really need to take in.  You know, there's a way to take back control, and it comes from forming a powerful alliance  of Americans that will only support candidates. that are small dollar campaigns. candidates that  absolutely refuse to take any money from Apac,

from the military-industrial complex complex, big  pharma, the big industries and the big donors, the big nasty donors and the big nasty political  consultants that continue the America last. policies that we all are are living in and we  hate. The American people can elect people that. will represent them when those representatives  are only funded by the people that vote for them.

That's the only way to get there. It's it is the  only way going forward because whoever holds the. purse strings holds the power over these elected  officials. So, do you think that can be done. within the current structure or do you think this  calls for a third party or fourth party? I think. it has to be weighed. Um, I've been looking  at the numbers. Independents in America are. bigger than the Democrat party and the Republican  party. Um, independents are oftent times over 40%.

And if independents were to come together on a  core group of policy issues and candidates that. they could fully support, then you could defeat  Democrat and Republican candidates. It's not It. would be very hard, but it is possible. I think  it's largely dependent on several things, Tucker. It's the millennials, many of the millennials, and  it's Gen Z. It's if the younger generations truly.

rise up and decide to get politically active,  they could fully take over and take the power away. from the baby boomer generation. The baby boomer  boomer generation is the generation that supports. the current political industrial complex. They  support it fully, Democrat and Republican. They're. the ones that vote the most. They're the ones that  donate the most. and they're the ones that remain.

glued to the television, to the propaganda news  that they're fed every single day from the left. and the right. However, I fully believe that  it's the younger generations that can make the. difference. And educating them, harnessing their  power, and helping them understand that it's they. who can take over and take control, then I think  this country can be saved. And I'll say one more. thing about the baby boomers. And I I really I  really attack the baby boomers a lot because I.

am angry about many of the things their generation  has supported and done. I'm fully disgusted at at. baby boomers that hold on to power in Congress and  in the Senate and many elected positions. Even our. current president falls in that category. Um he'll  probably never want to leave the White House. And. I'm sure me saying that will make headlines.  However, I think those baby boomers are the. most dangerous and they're completely responsible  for our nearly $40 trillion in debt. The fact that.

social security be will be completely insolvent  in just six to seven years and the very fact that. young Americans have it much harder because our  dollar is so weak. Tragically, it may require the. baby boomer generation passing away before Gen Z  and even millennials can fully get involved and. and work hard to take it back. But I don't think  it's impossible because I'll go back and just. finish with this. Like I told you, I witnessed a  miracle on the House floor on my very last vote.

when my bill, Protect Children's Innocence,  passed to make it a felony to trans children. Four Republicans voted no and three Democrats  voted yes. And that passed that bill. And I. never thought that bill was going to pass. I And  they told me, everyone told me it was impossible. Everybody, literally every single Republican told  me, "MJ, this bill will never pass." But it did,

Tucker. And I believe it was truly God. I felt it.  I know it in my heart. And I I watched it happen. I was there. It It literally was a miracle. So,  in saying that, I I'll say this, Tucker. I believe. good Americans through no hate in their heart  whatsoever who have their full faith in God, they. can actually take back this country, but you can't  be complacent. You can't sit on the sidelines and.

um you truly honestly have to have courage to  get involved. Marjorie Taylor Green of Georgia, thank you very much for that. Thank you.  And thank you. We'll see you next Wednesday.