Jon Stewart & Gov. Chris Christie on Trump’s Messy Start & What’s Ahead | The Weekly Show
JON STEWART: That was your bridge too far? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Yes. And I--. JON STEWART: Not to use the bridge, by the way. Sensitive topic. I don't want to go bridge. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Thank you very much, Jon. [THEME MUSIC]. JON STEWART: Hey, everybody. Welcome, once again, to The Weekly Show. My name is Jon Stewart. It is end of January, I'm going to say, 2025? President Trump has been president forever?
Or an hour. The confusion, the chaos, which I assuming is the point, has been stunning, even for those expecting. there to be this kind of--. I mean, they said shock and awe. They were coming in with shock and awe, which really. is not a phrase that you expect to be. deployed on your own country. I was under the impression that it was the kind of thing.
that we would deploy on countries. we had hostilities with. But it turns out, the hostility is with us. It's the people, the American people, that are going. to get the shock and awe. And I guess the most recent shock and awe is all the money. They just-- let's just stop the money, just real quick. I'm just going to-- you know what? What are we doing there? What are we paying for? Let's just-- let's just stop the money.
real quick and just take--. take a look at it. I imagine you could just keep paying the money. and take a look at it while it's happening, but I guess they wanted to stop it. They don't want to see it in motion. And apparently now, they've rolled back--. they're putting back in, I guess, Meals on Wheels and a couple of other things that--. you know, they don't want to kill old people, but the rest of us. Anyway, this is-- it's a lot. It's a fucking lot.
And to help us get through it, you know, I can talk with the home team as much as we want, I want to get some insight on somebody who really knows. Donald Trump, has spoken out against Donald Trump, has also collaborated. He's done the collabs and spoken out. But let's get to him right now to hopefully get. a sense of where this thing may, in fact, be going, and what are some of the darker undertones that are behind it?
So without further ado. [THEME MUSIC]. Governor Chris Christie, 55th governor--. 55th? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Yeah. JON STEWART: --of New Jersey, obviously. ran for president 2016, 2024. Governor, what's happening? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Exactly what I predicted would happen, Jon. I mean, you know, I ran for president. for a year telling everybody that, you know, this guy has not changed, he's not different,
and that character matters. And it matters more than any particular issue. And what we're seeing now in the first, you know, is it now 10 days or so? JON STEWART: Years. I believe, years. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Is that. You know, the problem is going to be that not everybody, in fact, not most people, will disagree. with everything he does. But the underlying problem, in my view,
is the pettiness, the vindictiveness, the anger, all those things will inform much of what he does, and it's. going to lead to big problems, I think, in the country over the long-term. JON STEWART: So why--. you know, you've known this about him. How long? You've known him for many, many years. CHRIS CHRISTIE: 23 years. JON STEWART: 23 years, OK. I don't imagine that the pettiness, vindictiveness, and anger, and those various things that you talk about, in terms of character, just recently surfaced,
that he went through some sort of midlife crisis. and ended up with some personality. tics that old people get. We've known this for a very long time. And by the way, you were one of his-- boy, he enjoyed making fun of you. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Oh, yeah. Still does. JON STEWART: But in 2016, you helped him. You helped him in the debates and all that. What is it that keeps people in the orbit?
Is it a fear that you will lose your political career. if you go against him? Is it a close to power? He makes people supplicants. How? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, I think that for different people, it's different things, JON STEWART: Right. CHRIS CHRISTIE: I think both of those factors. that you just put up there are, you know, the real reasons. for lots of different people. For me, back in 2016, you know, I had known him,
but not extraordinarily well. I'd known him for a long time, but nobody really. gets very close to Trump. But when you are a acquaintance of his, as I was during the years prior to 2016, he can be enormously charming--. JON STEWART: I'm sure. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --enormously engaging, very solicitous. And for me, both as US attorney for seven of those years. and then as governor for a number of those years, he was all those things to me.
So that was part of it. And the other part for me was that it was like, OK, I ran in the primary against him. He beat me. I'm a Republican. He's going to be the nominee. I'll be with him, and try to make him better. than what he is at the moment. And that was my motivation at the time, and I turned out to be wrong. JON STEWART: Even in that moment, when he's doing things like, you. know, he makes the, whatever it was, the Oreo joke, or he makes you a supplicant-- and this is 2016--. and then you watched him as president,
you know, you were part of his transition team, he went out of his way to shame you, right? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Mm-hmm. JON STEWART: Why go back in 2020? Like what-- what was it that made you still stick with--. You know, it's one thing to say, OK, well, that--. I didn't really know in 2016. In 2020, you clearly knew. So what is it, then? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, in 2020, I. think what it was, was looking at these two guys, looking at Joe Biden and Donald Trump,
and I really felt, at the time, like Biden. was just too old to be president, and wouldn't be able to do the job. And so I didn't like either choice, quite frankly. But--. JON STEWART: So you went with the one that was. fatally flawed character-wise. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Right. I went with-- I went with that one, as opposed. to the one who, you know, was, in my mind, mentally incapable of doing the job. JON STEWART: Had you had dealings. with Biden at that time and that's where. you drew that conclusion?
CHRIS CHRISTIE: Yeah, and known him for a long time. Like I've known Joe Biden longer than. I've known Donald Trump, because. Biden and I both went to the University of Delaware, and--. JON STEWART: Obviously, not at the same. I wouldn't--. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Not at the same time, no, but--. JON STEWART: Fair enough. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --but Biden was a regular presence. there when I was a student. And I was the president of the student body, so I wound up getting to serve on the board where Biden was, as well. So I got to know him, and we kept in touch over the years, and then reacquainted when he was vice president. and I was governor.
And he was very helpful during Sandy. and made a number of trips to the state. where I hosted him, to help see the damage and do all that. So when we had kept in touch over all those years, and I just saw the precipitous decline in the Joe Biden. I knew when I was a student, to the Joe Biden I knew even when. he was vice president, to the guy. who was running for president. And so that was the reason that I did what I did. And quite frankly then, on election night of 2020. was when I made the break, because when he came out,
meaning President Trump came out, and made his speech. on election night, where he said, you know, the election had been stolen--. I was on ABC at the time. JON STEWART: That was your bridge too far? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Yes. JON STEWART: Not to use the bridge, by the way. Sensitive topic. I don't want to go bridge. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Thank you very much, Jon. Your kindness is overwhelming. JON STEWART: Well, thank you. Thank you so much. CHRIS CHRISTIE: We usually use "that was the water. over the dam," but again--. JON STEWART: OK, fair enough. Yeah, you gotta really reach for metaphors when I'm talking. to ex-politicians here.
CHRIS CHRISTIE: You got to be very careful. JON STEWART: So many different scandals. CHRIS CHRISTIE: But, you know, in the end, I said to him, and I said it to him that night, that you have no way of knowing that this election was stolen, and what you're doing here is damaging our democracy, and I can't be supportive of it. And I said that on the air. I said it was a disgrace on the air that night. And we really, except for one or two conversations, have not spoken since. And that was November 2020. JON STEWART: Look, this is--. I feel it in my bones, a certain fright about where.
this thing is going to go. And the most difficult thing for me to reckon. is that moment that you speak about, from November to January, that inability to concede. the election results without any shred. of legitimate, court-tested proof, anything that. has evidentiary standards. As you know, the court system was really. the only thing that held up. The fact that January 6 happened.
not as a moment of, you know, a crime of passion, but as the result of careful weeks and months of planning. by his legal team, as to which obstacle he next had to reach. Like, I think what they said was, "This is your final shot. If we can't stop this Electoral Count, it's over. If we can't somehow make it chaotic and get. it thrown into the House." Right? The most anti-Democratic thing you. could possibly achieve, at least in my mind,
in an election in America. He was not punished for that. He was rewarded for that with not just an electoral college. win, but a popular vote win. So what are we now to make of this? You know, we've all got in our minds that Chris Christie. moment, a bridge too far. Even for someone that I had doubts about, character flaws, all these different things, he finally crossed for you, the Rubicon.
And America is unmoved by the character argument. and the autocrat argument. So what do you--. what are you left with? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, I think there's two things, right? First off, we have to concede that he. is the most fearless communicator I've seen. politically in my lifetime. And I don't mean that as a compliment.
He is willing to say anything over and over and over again, with passion. And for a lot of people who, Jon-- you know, look, you and I spend a lot of time thinking, reading, talking about this stuff. Most Americans don't. And so for them who just hear a snippet of this or that, they listen to who they think is most convincing, and that sways a lot of people.
I think the other thing about what happened in 2024. is that elections are always choices. at the presidential level. Most Americans feel some type of obligation. to vote in a presidential election. They may not vote in any of the other ones, but they feel like for president, I should vote. And turnout reflects that. And it was a choice here that, I think, really unfortunately for the country, the Democrats didn't present a choice that for a lot.
of Americans made sense. And I blame that on President Biden. because he made a promise to us in 2020. He said he was going to be a transitional leader, and we all understood, or thought we understood, what. that meant, which was he was going to serve one term, because at 82, he was just going to be. too old to be able to do this. And then, for whatever reason, he changed his mind. And I think if Joe Biden had left and said--. not left the presidency-- but had said after the midterms,
"You know what? I held off the Republicans here at the midterms, I did my job, and now, it's time to turn it over to a new generation. of Democrats to see who the next nominee will be.", I think the Democrats would have had a vigorous primary. A lot of really good potential candidates out there. Josh Shapiro from Pennsylvania. Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan. You can go through a whole list of them. And instead what he did was hang on till he was practically.
being, you know, shoved out the door with his fingernails. grasping the door jamb, and left Kamala. Harris as the only option. And vice presidents are never well thought of, no matter. which party it is, and gave her 107. days to try to convince the American people. that she was better. And I think strategically, for her, the big mistake was she didn't distance herself from Biden. And when 72% of the country, as the last poll the last weekend,
said the country is on the wrong track, not separating yourself from the person who was president. when it went to 72% wrong track is a politically fatal mistake. So I think, Jon, for people who don't focus on politics, who. maybe didn't think about this election. until two or three weeks, or maybe even less, before Election Day, all that stuff matters, and is part of the explanation for why. he did as well as he did. JON STEWART: But let's go-- you know, it's interesting, because you talk about it.
in terms of the people, right? And you say, well, it's a binary choice, this person. versus this person. But I think there's something deeper here about a system. of government that people no longer feel is responsive. enough for them, that Democracy, in and of itself, has gotten sort of sclerotic and is not--. is not agile in the way that it needs to be. And is it that-- you know, I don't necessarily disagree.
with Donald Trump's diagnoses. The system is rigged against people. Powerful interests have the ear of our politicians. The government is not responding, necessarily, to the discomfort of its, let's call them, customers, right? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Yeah. JON STEWART: I think it's a Trojan Horse. It seems like what the Republicans have in mind is. kind of an undoing of the relationship that we have. established between the people and the government.
since the New Deal. And further than that, the Immigration. Act of the '60s and the Civil Rights Act of the '60s. These are the things that this Project. 2025 wants to disassemble. It's sort of like Project 1929. Is that their aim and all--. everything else is sort of noise? Is the signal here a refashioning.
of the relationship between the government and the people? CHRIS CHRISTIE: I think that maybe. the goal of some of the folks who work with Donald Trump. I don't think Donald Trump has any overarching philosophical. goal, except that he wants to be powerful, and listened to, and in charge. I think what is causing this is you're.
right about the underlying problem, which I've heard. from Republicans and Democrats, which is, I just want some competence. Like it's their objection is less to--. in the main on the programs and things that government does--. is less about the programs in a lot of instances, and more about the way they function, or don't function. The way they waste money, the way. they don't bring things to the people.
that they really need, and aren't responsive. And you can look at this in a number of different ways. You know, the wildfires in California. are just the latest example of it. But people are like, how the hell does this happen? Why isn't government on top of this? And we've seen it over and over again. in a number of different ways. Everything from something as serious as the wildfires, to something as just annoying as the Air Traffic Control. system, and why are people so delayed.
when they're flying around the country all the time? Because it doesn't seem like the FAA. can run the Air Traffic Control system competently anymore. And I think that, that anger, when people feel like they're. paying a lot of money for this government. and what are they getting for it, is something that Trump was really able to tap into. And that, for whatever reason, the Democrats felt the need. to defend it holistically, rather than say, look, you're right, you know, it can be done better,
and here are ideas for how it can be done better. Rather than say, he's wrong, you're wrong, there's nothing wrong here. Everything's OK. JON STEWART: Right. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, people, you know, they have eyes of their own, and they. make their own conclusions. So I think it's a little more complicated. JON STEWART: You know, we sort of have two tranches there. One is the wildfire, and the other. is kind of the day-to-day, Jesus, when I want to apply for something, I have to go through 10 pages. And by the way, you know, if we were to have a moon shot--.
rather than going to Mars, I would like. to see all of our best engineers and technicians. on a bureaucratic moon shot, to try and do a Manhattan. Project of ridiculous fucking paperwork, and how you simplify that in a way that makes sense. So I have great sympathy for that. The wildfire thing is slightly different in my mind, because that also speaks to a larger--. you know, everybody wants to stop these things.
and react to them. Like Los Angeles and climate change and no water, like there's a lot of factors. That when a tornado comes and there's a fire, I don't know how many trucks you could park near the area, and how much water you could have, that would have stopped what was something. that, from a lot of the firefighters. I talked to out there, they thought was inevitable. That when you put that many houses in that.
dry a place with those high winds, this is going to happen. We're willing to scream at Los Angeles. because they hired a lesbian fire chief and a Black mayor, but nobody wants to talk about the way. that these disasters have been exacerbated by climate. and all kinds of other things. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, and look, I would say to you, yeah, everybody gets selective about what they want.
to get outraged about, often depending. upon where you sit politically or philosophically. But I do think that there are things that can and should have. been done in that instance. And quite frankly, you know, let's personalize it. All right? We're both from New Jersey. We went through Sandy. JON STEWART: Yes. CHRIS CHRISTIE: And I think we've done a lot of things. since Sandy that we learned to make, you know, structures more resilient,
to not be piling up houses all along the shore that can't. possibly sustain storms, to reinforce all. of our infrastructure in ways that recognize. that these storms can now happen, so that we protect those things. And I think that that's what people are expecting. JON STEWART: But it's still hubris. I mean, there is still a certain extent like, OK, Sandy. hit, so we learned our lesson. Everybody, 8 feet up on stilts, and let's put a berm up. But like God is going to come in and go like, really? Stilts?
You think-- you think stilts? We have to have a certain acceptance of our vulnerability. on this. I think we can always do a better job. There is no question in my mind that there were. things that could be done. But when we focus so much on DEI. and all this other dumb shit that they think. is determinative--. like they built communities that. were really dense with millions of people in arid areas.
that have fire things. Like, I'm pretty sure that was not DEI. That was probably a white dude, who designed that. Like, what are we doing? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, look, I think you and I are saying. the same thing, I think. That there's bad decisions that are made. And you can't-- the other thing that I used to say to people. all the time when I was governor was, there's some. things that I just can't help. Like, you know, you could do the very best you can, and there's some things you can't help. Now, people don't like to hear that.
And part of it is that people just don't like when bad things. happen, for obvious reasons, and they need. someone or something to blame. Now, you know when you're also doing things that don't make. sense to people, those become easy straw men to knock. down, right? So if people look at DEI--. and I think a majority of the people in the country. now feel this way--. that maybe that's not the best way. to be making some of these selections and choices.
of people for jobs, and maybe it. should be based predominantly, if not exclusively, on competence, it creates an easy straw man, Jon, for folks who are looking for someone or something. to blame. JON STEWART: I understand, but--. so let's break that down a little bit, because I think that is an incredibly powerful thread. that's been going through our society for a long time, that this idea of DEI is anti-merit. You know, it takes our meritocracy that we've.
worked so hard to fix, which says like, when were we a meritocracy? Like at what point is diversity less competitive? Introducing more people into the system. who have different skill sets and come from different things? You know, hiring is subjective. There's no objective test. It's always subjective. Let's look at the secretary of Defense. Right? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Yeah. JON STEWART: Well now, we live in a meritocracy.
We've restored it. Lloyd Austin is the DEI candidate. Even though he had, I don't know, 40 years of experience. running large organizations. Like, if you got those two resumes, between he and Pete Hegseth, which one. would be considered of merit? CHRIS CHRISTIE: And that's my point. My point is, diversity, in and of itself, is not something that causes there not to be merit hires. OK? You can look at two resumes blind,
and if-- your example is a really good one. You know, whether it's Lloyd Austin or Pete Hegseth, on the paper, Lloyd Austin has significantly more high level. experience to be secretary of Defense than Pete Hegseth does. I think that what has developed over time, because some people. have taken that to an extreme, meaning the DEI implementation, is it allows people to think that--. And in some instances, they're absolutely true. It's absolutely true that those decisions were made purely.
for the diversity part of it, with the merit. being well below it. JON STEWART: But where is that done? I'm trying to think like my experience. You have experience hiring as well, right? CHRIS CHRISTIE: I do. A lot. JON STEWART: I've experienced hiring. What I found was hiring has a certain inertia to it, right? Generally, the people that kind of started whatever industry.
or whatever office did generally. hire close to people that resemble them. And I'm not even talking about white, Black, whatever. I'm talking about like--. I'll just go with late night comedy, right? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Yeah. JON STEWART: David Letterman revolutionized. late night comedy. He did it with, you know, a lot of Harvard, Lampoon, SNL, same way writers. So the comedy writing industry was, for a long time, not necessarily out of malevolence.
or prejudice, the inertia of it, the status quo of it, was nerdy white dudes from Harvard. and the other Ivy Leagues. CHRIS CHRISTIE: That's very bad to say about Conan. That's horrible to be-- JON STEWART: Terrible. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --saying that about Conan, Jon. JON STEWART: But even when we went to like, oh, we're going to do blind submissions, what we didn't realize is all the agents are also steeped. in that same status quo. So all the resumes, even when we would get them, still. predominantly, when we went specifically to say,
now, this is what you would consider. DEI, give us, not that. Open it up to make sure you give us women, people. of color, other writers, so that we. can at least see what that is. And all of a sudden, we found these incredible writers. Now, you could say, oh, you put diversity over competence, but that's the red herring.
We didn't. We opened up what were stagnant pools. Pools that were incestuous. And we opened up those tributaries. And isn't that what increases competition, not decreases it? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Right. JON STEWART: Here's another example. All this talk about meritocracy. Vivek Ramaswamy comes out and says, all right, well, we need these engineers on H-1B visas, right? They're very talented.
And everybody freaks the fuck out. How dare you prioritize these, what, better engineers? Like, what are we actually talking about? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Right. Look, I would give you the way that I try to approach it. I became US attorney in New Jersey in '02. I had never worked in the office before. So when I got there, I just did a lot. of walking around the office to see like, OK, who's here? And Jon, it was the whitest, male-est office I.
had ever been in, in my life. And it was-- and I was coming from private law practice. JON STEWART: Right. CHRIS CHRISTIE: So what I did was, I said, look, I am forcing us to go out. and recruit candidates who are African-American, Latino, Asian, women, and bring them to me. And if they're not good, I'm not going to hire them, but I'm convinced, we're not seeing them. And the aha moment for me on that concept,
and why it was the right way to go, was there was a young guy that I hired very early. on, African-American, University of Michigan. University, Penn Law School, clerked for Alan Page, the former defensive tackle--. JON STEWART: Minnesota Viking. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --in the Supreme Court--. JON STEWART: Purple People Eater. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --of Minnesota. Absolutely. And I said-- and he's from New Jersey, grew up in Maplewood. And I said to him, "Why didn't you ever apply here before?". And he said, "Because I knew people. like me wouldn't get hired".
And, you know, we then went about this process. of hiring, you know, a large number of African-American, Latino, and Asian prosecutors. But I would tell you that every one of them checked both boxes. They checked the box of they now look more. like the community we represent than we did before, and these are really good lawyers. JON STEWART: But that's the point of DEI. DEI is not there to just change the color scheme.
and the palette. It's to look at a broader-- and by the way, it includes hiring veterans, people. of different socioeconomic status. Like it's not just race or gender. Like diversity brings a resilience. to your organizations that it might not have otherwise. CHRIS CHRISTIE: And I don't think, Jon, that that's the way it's been implemented across the board. in government. And I think people see examples of that, and it makes them--.
and it makes them paint the entire effort. with the same brush. JON STEWART: But without that, when has merit ever. been implemented in that way? Legacy admissions to colleges. Legacy admissions to the big firms. Like, why do we assume that the so-called meritocracy, the way. that things were done in the past when America was great, was an objectively meritocratic system?
It wasn't. It's rigged. It's always been rigged. It's more rigged by that than any measure of bringing. on somebody whose experience for the position. may be slightly more unorthodox. CHRIS CHRISTIE: And my argument to you. is, I don't think it makes it any better to just rig. it in a different direction. And I think that's what people perceive was going on with DEI. JON STEWART: It's not rigging it at a different direction. It's un-rigging it. That's my point is you're--.
CHRIS CHRISTIE: But that's where we disagree. JON STEWART: Oh. CHRIS CHRISTIE: I think there have been a number of areas. where there are people who hire certain folks just. for their diversity. And I've seen it happen here in New Jersey, you know, in the government since I left, where people say, I am going to make sure that I have one of every-- it's almost. like a half a Noah's Ark. OK? I'm going to have one of these, and one of these, and one of these, and one of these. And I think--. JON STEWART: You just told me that's what you did.
in the prosecutor's office. CHRIS CHRISTIE: No. What I did was get them into interview them. And if it turned out-- JON STEWART: Right? CHRIS CHRISTIE: --if it turned out, Jon, that they were also really good lawyers, they got hired. I'm talking about something different. I'm talking about predetermining. the outcome in the way that you just talked about. And I believe that legacy admissions. predetermine the outcome. That there have been some in charge of government. across this country who have predetermined outcomes, and said, I am going to have this many African-Americans,
this many Latinos, this many Asians, this many lesbians, this many gay men. And I think that when people see. that, they say to themselves, that's not right, either. Not that the other way was completely right--. JON STEWART: But that's--. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --but now, you're really screwing it up. They're both wrong. JON STEWART: Right, but--. CHRIS CHRISTIE: And I didn't get--. I didn't get any objection when I did what I did in New Jersey. It wasn't like a bunch of people started picketing, when. they started to see African-American, Latino, and Asian, and women prosecutors.
in the federal courthouse, that they started saying, what the hell is Christie doing over there? He's turning the place into this. JON STEWART: No, I know, but that's because there's. been a purposeful dismantling of anything that looks. to repair the damage done by, what were, the legacy. and you know, the exclusionary practices of the past. That's purposeful. The backlash against DEI is not a populist uprising.
against hiring. It's the purposeful framing of that through political actor.s. I mean, that's what Christopher Rufo, that's what DeSantis, like that's what these guys are doing intentionally. This isn't the world suddenly saying, oh, my God, what happened to our competence? Like, there was something about they wanted a diversity program. in hiring pilots, and everybody was like, why don't they. just hire the best pilots? And the idea is like, you really. think they're out there just going,
give me a Black guy that doesn't know anything. about, you know, the qualifications. needed to become a pilot, or won't study to become a pilot. It's just another way to retreat from, I think, the added competition of diverse populations. CHRIS CHRISTIE: I would say that airlines would not. hire pilots given the importance of the safety. of what they do-- JON STEWART: Right, CHRIS CHRISTIE: --if they think they were competent.
JON STEWART: But you saw that was a huge story--. CHRIS CHRISTIE: I did. JON STEWART: --on the right. CHRIS CHRISTIE: However, I will also tell you. that I think that a lot of people. don't view certain government positions nearly as critical. And so they feel like I can do this, and I think the public senses that. And that's the problem, Jon. JON STEWART: But they're getting. blamed for the government's lack. of agility and responsiveness. So what I object to is now, suddenly we go, I appreciate the diagnosis, right? Government not responding to the discomfort.
of the people in an agile way. What I don't appreciate is that, that is being blamed on DEI and illegal immigration. CHRIS CHRISTIE: I think that it's. being blamed on political actors. on the other side of this, Jon, who. are using it for their own political purposes. Let's be honest, there are people. who, on the Democratic side of this, who will do it to try. to make themselves look more caring.
to the minority community, more in touch. with the minority community. And I think that their motivations. are craven in that regard. Not everybody, but I think a lot of them. JON STEWART: Listen, the best example of that. was after George Floyd when the Democrats gathered, I can't remember where it was, in the Rotunda, like in kente cloth. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Yeah. JON STEWART: And you know, it was Nancy Pelosi standing--. and I agree with you. A lot of it can be performative, right? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Yes.
In Gucci shoes and kente cloth, you know. I mean, it's--. JON STEWART: Exactly. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --it's a little--. JON STEWART: But the fact that it's distasteful. doesn't mean that it's not necessary. And I think-- and this ties back in, and this will bring it back around, maybe, to Donald Trump. and how this is going. Make America great again. You know, you're not quite sure what they mean. Do they mean return it to the default. setting, which is, I guess, as you said, white, male, and competent? Like, is that the idea behind this,
and is that what people are voting for? And in your mind is that Donald Trump's vision of this? CHRIS CHRISTIE: No. I think Donald Trump thought it was a cool slogan that would. respond to what people were feeling, both when he ran in 2016 and when he ran in 2024, which. was they were at that moment dissatisfied. with the status quo. So if you can tie into that politically, rhetorically, and say, I'm going to make America great again,
it does two things. It tells people, I agree with you, it's not great now, and two, I'm the guy who can make. it great like you remember it. And many Americans are going to have. different feelings about when it was great. and what made it great. The classic marketing tool of Donald Trump on this. was it can mean whatever you want it to mean, Jon. And so people think Donald Trump has a vision.
JON STEWART: You don't think it's more purposeful than that? I mean, the co-opting of the language of like, America first, I mean, it's got so many--. look--. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, those are two different things. JON STEWART: But they've really put them together. They've put them, you know--. I will-- what did he say in his inaugural speech? I will always put America first. He must be very aware of the evocation of that. No? CHRIS CHRISTIE: The fact that you would assume that Donald. Trump knows any American history is startling to me, Jon, because he doesn't.
JON STEWART: I honestly don't think you're. giving him enough credit. I think--. CHRIS CHRISTIE: No. You're wrong. I've known him a lot longer and a lot closer than you have, and I am telling you. JON STEWART: Yeah. CHRIS CHRISTIE: He doesn't know. I could give a lot of examples of how. he messes up American history. He took me to the Lincoln Bedroom one time, and he pointed to the desk in the Lincoln Bedroom, and he said, "That's where Lincoln. wrote the Gettysburg Address.". Now, anybody who has read the history of the Gettysburg. Address knows that Lincoln wrote.
the Gettysburg Address on the train, on the way to Gettysburg. JON STEWART: Right. I guess that was why it's so short. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Yeah. JON STEWART: That's why it's--. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Exactly right. It's a short train ride. What he did at the desk was sign. the Emancipation Proclamation. And I said to the then president, now president, I said, "No, no, no, no, no. It was the Emancipation Proclamation there. He wrote the speech on the way to Gettysburg.". And he looked at me. He said, "Chris, you're really going to correct me on this? I'm the president. I live here.". [LAUGHING].
So I have to tell you, Jon, I think you're. giving him too much credit. JON STEWART: Right. CHRIS CHRISTIE: But let me say, there's a difference, I think, between make America great again and America first. JON STEWART: OK. CHRIS CHRISTIE: And what I used to say in the campaign. was America first. I want everybody to raise their hand here, who believes in America fourth. Put 'em up. JON STEWART: Right, right, right. CHRIS CHRISTIE: America fourth. Like--. JON STEWART: Well, it's sort of-- it's. one of those things that goes without saying, in my mind. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Exactly. Right? JON STEWART: Right. CHRIS CHRISTIE: So these are things. that are inoffensive when you look. at them literally, and allows you to then sell.
to people a couple of things. The people who are there now? It was Obama and Hillary back in '16. It was Biden and Harris in '24. America's not great because of them. America's not first because of them. It is a purely political and rhetorical idea that, and-- this is the point I think you were getting at when I. interrupted you-- there are people around him who want. to populate that in a way that is much.
deeper and much different. But I'm telling you, from Trump's perspective, he came up with that stuff and just went like, this will sell. And he's selling it. JON STEWART: Wow. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Remember, this is a Democrat. Trump was a Democrat. When I first met Trump, he was a Democrat. donating to Hillary Clinton. This is not a guy--. JON STEWART: But again, transactional, I'm. sure, to try an get, you know. CHRIS CHRISTIE: But look, Jon, as transactional as you might. want to be, if you are steeped in what Donald Trump now says. he's steeped in, philosophically,
how could you write a check to Hillary Clinton? You couldn't, because you'd say to yourself, look, that's--. to use your phrase--. a bridge too far. Like, OK, I'll give to this one or that one. because I have to, because I need. permits in New York, or something like that, but why am I giving to Hillary Clinton? Well, I'm giving to Hillary Clinton because, at that time, he could have cared less about anything philosophically. And I think people are reading too. much into him philosophically. He is transactional, Jon.
Whatever gets him from here to there. JON STEWART: So then let's talk about then, the people around him. I definitely view the way he runs this country as, look, he has run the Trump organization. It's not a publicly-traded company. He runs it, he is the emperor of that empire, he is the king of it all, and I think that's where he's most. comfortable being, obviously. And he is looking at the federal government. to reflect that ethos, that he is steeped. in that kind of imperious way.
What I am seeing is our system is not. very well-prepared to handle somebody. who's going to push it. There's enough cracks and air and loopholes and things within. our system that if you want to push it-- and by the way, he's nullified Congress, because now. he's got the House and the Senate, and he's got the judiciary--. like everybody wants to say, OK, this is, he's a fascist. What I'm looking at it as, haven't we handed him the keys.
to that type of ruler? He's been handed it democratically. Like that's what's most frightening to me is, you always think of the last bulwark is. the consent of the governed. Right? He has that, and the Democrats are in utter disarray. So how do you realistically stand up to a person. that is very comfortable operating.
at that imperial level of--. our government at it's kind of--. the founders didn't think of it that way. They thought it would be a check. and balance between judiciary and legislative and executive. I don't think they viewed it as two parties fighting. each other, and a president that's going. to push the shit out of this. Unitary executive. I mean, they almost made it that the president was. like an eight-person board. So I've yet to see, what is the effective response.
to a Democratic system that can be used in the way. that it was designed to create a more autocratic system? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, a good question, and here's. what the founders also didn't count on. That we would elect lousy people to the other branches,
or appoint lousy people to the other branches. Now, you know, you look at what's happening in Congress. right now, and you have a group of people who in the main. are unwilling to stand up. I mean, the only way a check on a power is effective. is if you're willing to exercise the check. And the founders couldn't also make it self-actualizing. There are human beings who have to actually do it.
And my problem with folks in my party right. now is that people who I know disagree, who I know, know better, are so wedded to their position. that they are unwilling to say what they truly believe. And that's the problem with the way. the system is operating, Jon. The system is fine. The people we've handed the keys to operate the system, not just in the executive branch,
but in the legislative branch, are. not doing their job even to being honest with themselves. JON STEWART: So-- and this is the question. that gets back to what we talked about originally. And it's not meant-- it's not a gotcha. It's not meant to the thing. You were one of those people. You knew. In 2016, you knew what this guy was. You knew all those things. You had rationalization for why you didn't--. you didn't act upon that and call it out earlier.
You not only-- it's not even that you stepped back. You actively participated in there. So you, I think, rightly have identified something, but very clearly, it's something you yourself, I think, fell victim to. And you can say, well, in 2020 when he finally wouldn't. concede, that's when I knew. But you did know. And these people know, and they don't do it. So what do you say to them, and what do you say to yourself? CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, a few things.
I think, first off, to be fair about your characterization. of me--. [LAUGHING]. JON STEWART: Wait, when do I have to be? CHRIS CHRISTIE: You don't have to be. I'm suggesting you might want to be. JON STEWART: All right. Fair enough. CHRIS CHRISTIE: That I did run against him in 2016. JON STEWART: But you weren't running against him. You were running for president. That's different. CHRIS CHRISTIE: No, no, no. It became pretty clear early that he. became the front runner. JON STEWART: Well. CHRIS CHRISTIE: And I'm not one of those people. who tries to, you know, hit in the side pocket, Jon, as you know. JON STEWART: Right, right, right.
CHRIS CHRISTIE: I went right at him in 2016--. JON STEWART: No question. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --and in 2024. JON STEWART: Yes. CHRIS CHRISTIE: But I believed in the system. that we just talked about. JON STEWART: OK. CHRIS CHRISTIE: And I said, OK, this. is who the people have chosen. I'm going to go try to make him better. I'm going to work within the system. to try to make him better. And that's what I did in 2016 and throughout the first term. of his presidency, was to continue. to be the agitator to him to try to do things differently. And one of the people who had known him for a long time,
so I could get him on the phone and say, "This is wrong.". Suggest people to serve that I think would make it better. That was a manifestation of my belief in the system. And what I concluded on the evening of 2020. was he didn't give a damn about the system. right down to its very basic, which was the Democratic act. of electing a president. And that's when I said, I'm out. JON STEWART: Do you still believe in the system?
CHRIS CHRISTIE: I do. And the reason that I still believe in the system. is because there's no frigging alternative. JON STEWART: Well, apparently, there's. a bunch of alternatives. CHRIS CHRISTIE: There's not. I mean, and I don't think there will be one with him either. JON STEWART: Right. CHRIS CHRISTIE: You know, I still believe that--. and you talked about the consent of the governed. That's why we have elections every two years. Now, if he does the things that I fear he will do--.
JON STEWART: You really-- you really think it's going there? You think-- do you think the chaos is purposeful, to start invoking some of those more emergency-type powers? Is that where this is going? CHRIS CHRISTIE: No, I think the chaos. is being done because that's the way he loves to operate. That's where he is most comfortable. He is most comfortable in chaos, and he's most comfortable in having people. fight with each other, and have him be the ultimate arbiter. of those fights. He loves that. He loves the interchange and the back and forth,
not for educational purposes. JON STEWART: So this is all just a fucking. episode of The Apprentice? CHRIS CHRISTIE: It's all a TV show. JON STEWART: Like the secretary of State. and the secretary of Defense is going. to be like Meat Loaf and Gary Busey arguing in the boardroom? CHRIS CHRISTIE: It's all a TV show, Jon. JON STEWART: Oh, God. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Look, Jon, what have you. heard him say about the way he makes selections for positions? JON STEWART: He sees them on TV. CHRIS CHRISTIE: The greatest compliment. he feels like he can give to anyone, which he said about Pete Hegseth, for instance, was he's out of central casting. And so for anybody to think that this is anything.
other than that, but with real-life ramifications, has not watched him over this period of time. Now, there will be things that he will do that I will. agree with philosophically. But the problem for me is, I cannot rationalize away. the character mistakes, the pettiness, the vindictiveness, and all the rest of it by saying, "Yeah, but I agree with him on what he's doing.
on" fill-in-the-blank. Whatever it might be. And that's where you have a lot of Republicans. right now are rationalizing it that way. "Well, I agree with his--. I don't like him, and I disagree with him personally, but I feel like--. I agree with many of his policies, so I'll be with him.". The problem is that he does things like this. Pulls the security detail from Mike Pompeo. Now, that is nothing but pettiness. and vindictiveness colored with absolute mortal danger.
Here's Pompeo as CIA Director and Secretary. of State, who executes an order from the commander-in-chief. in alignment with our system, and gets. Soleimani assassinated. The Iranians now say we're going. to kill Pompeo and a couple of other folks, too--. Jon Bolton, Brian Hook--. and as a result, the intelligence community. says we need to give these guys security. Because they didn't jump through hoops to support. Donald Trump, he's now pulled it, and said, hey,
they have money. They can buy their own security. Well, that may or may not be true. I don't know the financial circumstances. of those three guys. But what I will tell you is having had public security. and private security, public security. is much better, because they have access to intelligence. They have access to information that private security. guys just don't have. To me, that's the essence of the problem here, is that no matter what he may do from a policy perspective. that you agree or disagree with, he will always revert back to pettiness and vindictiveness.
JON STEWART: He will always take the cruelest option. he can possibly come up with. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Absolutely, right. JON STEWART: So that brings us to--. And I'm cognizant of your time, and I really. do appreciate you being here, and this will bring. us back around to the end--. when I look at that, his pettiness or his cruelty. or his comfort in chaos, I feel like the arguments against him. have been litigated now for 10 years, through the public.
and through the courts. You know, we've gone through 10, 12 years of he's terrible, he's a threat to Democracy, he's an autocrat. And Americans saw that. They saw January 6, they saw everything, they saw the convictions, the felonies, and they went, yeah, we're good with that. Not only are we good with that, we're better with that. than we were the last time. And we've talked a little bit about, you know, your idea. that Republicans have shown their character by not, in any way, standing up to that aspect of it,
even if they might agree with them philosophically. on certain areas. So now, let's talk about the Democrats, because this is the team I consider my team, and I feel they are utterly rudderless. They've litigated the, "he's an autocrat, and he's a dick argument.". It hasn't gone anywhere, and it seems like they are utterly. unprepared for this onslaught, and are still just shouting. autocracy, rather than, look, this guy walked into office.
with a Project 2025 book. This is a 50- to 60-year project. they've been working on. How is it that the Democrats are so flat-footed here? And where is-- where is their counter to that idea. that Americans feel left out of the government? Why are they just status quoing it? Why are they just sending out Chuck Schumer to put his. glasses down by his nose, to look down and read a statement,
in as flat a monotone as you could possibly muster, about the existential danger we face of this autocrat, and then, like, take a quick call from his kid and laugh. about, "My grandson lost a tooth.", and then. he goes back to like--. why is Obama, you know, laughing with him at a thing? It all feels performative. And what is the actual--. where's the book that says this is what.
the relationship of the government is, and here's how we're going to fix it. CHRIS CHRISTIE: First off, I'd say, they overplayed and over-litigated. the character things on Trump, especially in the '24 campaign. The people who were not going to vote for Donald Trump. on the character issues already determined they're not going. to vote for Donald Trump. The people that the Democrats had to persuade. were the people you and I were just talking about, who said, like, look, I get that, but the government sucks, and you guys are running it and it sucks,
and what's your answer to that? And neither Biden nor Harris during this last cycle. had an answer to that. Nor did Chuck Schumer, nor did any of the rest of them, because their answer to all that was, oh, yeah, yeah, but Trump will be worse. Well, you know what they figured out? People went, nah, maybe not, because you guys aren't. giving me an alternative. And I think that the problem is that there. is two things going on inside the Democratic Party.
There is an unresolved conflict within the Democratic Party, from the very progressive wing of the party to the more. traditional Democrats, about who's going to run the show, and who's going to write the playbook. They haven't resolved that problem, and they all papered it over. And you got to have the fight, inside the Democratic Party, to what is it that we stand for governmentally? What do we believe in? What would we do for people to deal. with that disconnect and the discontent that's going on?
They haven't answered those questions. JON STEWART: But the Republicans. are very good at-- they've lined up. a lot of their think tanks, with their media, with their political arms. They have fights, too. They've got a Freedom Caucus. Like right now, the Democratic strategy appears to be, let's hope Chip Roy is so fucking crazy that he'll just. stand up and make it impossible for the House to pass anything, rather than, you can't just tell people.
to steer away from that crash. You have to give them a direction to drive into. And I know that's being reductive, but they don't seem to have that same infrastructure. or leadership. CHRIS CHRISTIE: You're right. They don't right now, and that's the problem with having. gone back to Biden. Going back to Biden in '20 was a reaction to Trump. It was like, OK, he's the guy who will be least offensive,
and will make Trump the focus. JON STEWART: But he won, I mean. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, but won what? Then he came in-- JON STEWART: The presidency. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Right, but no-- but Jon, won--. this is what I mean, that like, when he got there, he started to go much more progressive than he had talked. about during the campaign. JON STEWART: Oh, I don't--. I mean, if your idea is like, the Democrats. lost because Biden was too progressive, I would--. CHRIS CHRISTIE: No, no.
Let me finish the thought. JON STEWART: All right. CHRIS CHRISTIE: It was cognitively dissonant. for people. They didn't believe that's who Biden was, either outside the party or inside the party, so he got the worst of both worlds. The people inside the party who were progressive never. trusted him. They didn't think he was one of them. The people outside the party who were more moderate. said, son of a bitch, he lied to us. He is a progressive. He got absolutely sandwiched politically,
and now, no one knew who he was. And the worst thing in politics to be, Jon, is to be perceived to be inauthentic. And Trump's power is that people believe what. he believes, what he says. That's what they think. JON STEWART: Which is entirely the opposite. of what reality is. He's a guy who says, I'm the free-- free speech is back, and by the way, somebody should remove. MSNBC from the air and CBS, and I'm going to sue everybody.
Like it's incoherent. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Correct. I totally agree that he is a transactional speaker, right? Whatever gets him-- you know, the old song, "Whatever Gets You Thru the Night,"-- for Trump, that's the way he speaks all the time, whatever. gets him through this moment. But my point on the Democrats is they were in the worst. possible space they could be. They didn't have a game plan, as you mentioned, an offering. to the American people substantively, and they were viewed as inauthentic.
Well, shit, what's going to happen then? People want common sense. They want a common sense, articulated alternative to what. they're being presented with. And in the absence of one, they'll vote for the group. that they think looks most authentic. Now, the challenge for Republicans, to not make it seem like it's going to be all like hearts. and flowers, and it's going to be easy, when you've. got a three- or four-vote majority in the House,
two right now, everybody's a king. And whatever's happening right now, remember, it's all been executive orders. Not a thing has happened through Congress. JON STEWART: He's basically nullified them. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Right, at the moment. But he's not going to be able to do that on the tax law. He's not going to be able to do that. on real substantive changes to immigration. JON STEWART: But don't you think. reconciliation allows him much more leeway through the Senate? I mean, he's going to push everything to reconciliation. CHRIS CHRISTIE: It does through the Senate. But in the House, here's his problem on reconciliation.
There is a large group of Republicans-- and by large, I mean 25 to 30--. JON STEWART: Chip Roy. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --that are going to say, like, hey, we're not increasing the debt ceiling in March. unless there is significant reductions. in government spending. JON STEWART: See, here's where I. think he's going to get around that, and I truly believe this. I think they're being really shrewd about this. I think they actually are going to be. ruthless in cutting spending. And I think you're seeing that now with the freeze. on everything else. Like I think he's calculated that into their project.
I think these guys, again, they've thought this through. They have a game plan. In my mind, this really is--. and maybe it's just because it's my team. I'm so frustrated with their inability. to mount any coherent opposition other than, we're telling our lawyers to file an injunction. I mean, come on, guys, this is autocracy. And it goes back to, the only path.
I see out of this really dark tunnel that we're in, and I do feel like it's dark and going to get darker, is they have to have at least one of the handles of power. And to get that, they have to present. a convincing, authentic, coherent, and directed, and led vision--. not of I'm a progressive, I'm a conservative, I'm a thing, I'm a that--. of how to make this thing work, how to make it.
work for people to agilely respond. They're paying money in. What are they getting back, and what. does that mean to their lives? And if they can't do that, we're royally fucked. That is the premise. CHRIS CHRISTIE: You should be extraordinarily disappointed. in your team, and the lack of any coherent, saleable, authentic plan.
I totally agree with you. But remember this. Games are both offense and defense. JON STEWART: Uh-oh. Now, you're talking my language. Now, this is all bringing it back to sports radio, baby. CHRIS CHRISTIE: That's exactly right. We're going to get on FAN any moment now. JON STEWART: There you go. CHRIS CHRISTIE: It all comes back to offense and defense. There are big expectations on the Republicans. to deliver on a bunch of the stuff they're talking about. And for instance, when you talk about significant cuts. in spending, when you only have a two- or three-vote majority, there are a lot of moderate Republicans,
from New York, Illinois, California, who are going to have a hard time voting. for some of those things. And let us not forget the premise. of what I mentioned before. What they care about the most is keeping the title, Jon, and the title is kept for them by the people. back at home, not by the people in Washington. So the challenge for Republicans. and for Trump is going to be, can he muscle this through. and have them basically say, you're.
going to have to sacrifice your career for what. I want to get done here. And I got to tell you something. I haven't seen that type of political courage out. of any of them, because they're unwilling to stand. up and do those things. So Democrats, though, if they're counting just on that. to get them over the finish line, to getting a handle of power in either the House or the Senate, I think they're going to be sorely disappointed. They have to do both. They have to hope that the Republicans make.
strategic mistakes in that regard, but they got to come up with a plan that. is authentic and genuine that people. in the center of this country, and I mean. the philosophical center of this country, can say, "I agree with that. Yeah, no, that doesn't offend me.". And they don't have that right now. And you're right about Chuck Schumer. I mean, if you could have a worse salesman. to put up next to Trump, I don't know. that it's possible, right?
Now, I think Hakeem Jeffries is a little more politically. skilled than Schumer. Of course, that's a low bar, but nonetheless, I. think he's a little more skilled than him. And getting Pelosi out of there would be a real help. because rightly or wrongly, you know, people have. a certain perception of her in the middle. of-- in the philosophical middle of the country. that's not positive. So the fact is that the Democrats. have to change the cast--. if we're going to go back to the TV show analogy--. they've got to change the cast, and they've.
got to get some better writers for the script, because they don't have that now. JON STEWART: Perhaps if they opened up. the hiring to more diversity. See how we tied it all around? CHRIS CHRISTIE: I will tell you, this is really one of those things that people say, "Wow, those two guys really get it.". [LAUGHING]. To me, Jon, the frustrating thing for somebody. like me is like, as governor, I tried to be this way, I try to be practical and consistent. And sometimes you're going to like it, and sometimes you aren't. But I'm-- my job is to run this thing,
and to get it to work as best as I. possibly can get it to work. And I don't think anybody's thinking about it that way. right now. They're all thinking about it from a political advantage, a chess or checkers, depending upon the level of intellect, that's going on in this stuff. JON STEWART: And I think ultimately-- you know, you. as a governor, I think ultimately. what's going to happen is the states are going to have. to-- the system is still Federalist, and I think we're going to see power returning. to some of the states. And I think you're going to see governor's profiles raised.
within that, and I think they're going to come up. with really creative solutions to protect. the people most vulnerable to a lot. of the shit that's going down. And someone-- I have faith that someone may not rise out. of the legislative arms of the party, but out of the executive arms of the party, you may start to see some changes made. and some things come up. But ultimately, I really appreciate you taking the time. to talk with us today and given the insights. into what you were given. So thank you for being here.
CHRIS CHRISTIE: No, Jon, my pleasure. Always happy to come back. And I'd say as things go along here--. because it's going to change. It's going to change--. JON STEWART: No, I know. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --and I would say there are not many people. out there who know Trump as well as I've gotten to know him. over time, and been someone who he said. was the greatest governor in America. and now is the worst SOB--. JON STEWART: And he's not hyperbolic at all. CHRIS CHRISTIE: --and the worst-- now, I'm. the worst SOB in the world. And every, you know, cruel meme he could send out, he does.
And I never believed it when he said I was the greatest, and I don't believe it now. I'm calling balls and strikes here, because I know him well. And I will say one thing, if I can, about the governors. You know, I say to my kids all the time when they accuse me. of being biased on something, I say, OK, I'm biased, but it doesn't mean I'm wrong. And I'm biased about governors because they're. the ones who have to give practical results, not the people in Congress.
Like they have to actually like, plow the snow. They have to like, do things that run the schools, do all the things that need to be done. And I do think that you're going to see a lot of people. on both parties emerge from the governor's ranks to try to set. a different path and a more creative path. and a more practical path. And hopefully, it's the right ones who emerge. You know, there's good ones and bad ones. JON STEWART: Well, we'll have you name those next time. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Well, that's right, that's good, but that's a little preview. You know, this is also show biz. Look at you.
You're giving a little preview for my--. JON STEWART: It's a teaser. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Very nice. Very nice. Well, and I believe that's really important for us. to focus on, that everything in this country. doesn't happen in Washington. And that in state capitals all over this country, you can make a real difference in people's lives, and I'd argue, probably, a more direct and substantive. difference at that level than ever. happens in Washington, because they're. all scared of their own shadows, and want to just protect their title. They want to be called Congressman. and Senator forever, and--. JON STEWART: Get that good health care.
That's what they're in there for. CHRIS CHRISTIE: It's not bad, Jon. It's not from what I'm told. Never been there. JON STEWART: Chris Christie, former governor of New Jersey, presidential candidate, thank you so much, and we really do appreciate you coming on today. CHRIS CHRISTIE: Mr. Jersey, good to-- good to be on. Good to be on with you. I appreciate it, Jon. JON STEWART: Thanks, man. [THEME MUSIC]. Chris Christie, I want to thank him very. much for the conversation. For those of you who didn't see before we got started. in the conversation, we talked about Mets, and I don't think I've ever seen him as animated.
I think, that's the key is you bring up the Mets. and Chris Christie goes. So I want to also point a quick note. We taped a separate little piece. talking about in Afghan resettlement program for allies. of the United States who had been in Afghanistan, who are. having trouble now with the program. that was set up to get them into the United States safely. And we talked to Shawn VanDiver, who is heading up.
# a program called #AfghanEvac, about the status. of that program. You can check that out, as well. I think we're going to put that out as a separate piece, so as. rather not to make your podcast listen as long as--. I don't know how--. I don't know how far your car ride is, is. what I'm trying to say to you. I don't know how this goes. So anyway, we appreciate you sticking with the program, listening to it.
Please keep sending all your suggestions and such, and we'll check you out next week. As always, lead producer Lauren Walker, producer Brittany. Mehmedovic, video editor and engineer Rob Vitolo, audio editor and engineer Nicole Boyce, researcher and associate producer Gillian Spear, and our executive producers Chris McShane and Caity Gray, thank you guys so much. Could not-- could not--. do this thing without all their hard work. I really appreciate it, and we'll see you next week. [THEME MUSIC]. "The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart".
is a Comedy Central podcast. It's produced by Paramount Audio and Busboy Productions.
