No.1 Christianity Expert: If You DON'T Believe In a God You NEED to Hear This!
There are [music] worship groups that. worship AI because it's got some of the. qualities we normally associate with. God. And some people welcome this and. say this is the way we should go. But. the danger is we treat these human-like. robots as if they're conscious beings. This is a seriously important thing. And. I do feel that the Christian faith has a. great deal to say about this. >> And it's fascinating to me that you are. very religious, you believe in God, because typically I think that. mathematicians lean more towards. atheism. >> Great pioneers of modern science were.
all believers in God. And I've. interrogated myself about its truth for. over 70 years. I've made myself totally. vulnerable, and I find that Christ. offers me something nobody else offers. me. Peace in my heart. The peace of knowing. that I have real forgiveness. Things. like, for example, others met people and. even in death row. And I never forget. looking through the door of Russian. security death row. I went up to the. door, and a chap came over and looked at.
me. He killed 12 women. He said, "I. deserve to be here." And then his face. just burst into what I can only describe. as a ghastly smile. And he said, "I met. Jesus here, and [music] he forgave me.". >> So, on this point of forgiveness with a. serial killer, be forgiven and allowed. into heaven. And then how do you know. that this thing you've committed. yourself to is true? >> So, I have had several experiences. [music]. enough to tell me, "Look, this stuff is. real.". Okay, so.
>> This is super interesting to me. My team. gave me this report to show me how many. of you that watch this show subscribe. And some of you have told us, according. to this, that you are unsubscribed from. the channel randomly. So, favor to ask. all of you, please could you check right. now if you've hit the subscribe button. if you are a regular viewer of the show. and you like what we do here. We're. approaching quite a significant landmark. on this show in terms of a subscriber. number. So, if there was one simple free. thing that you could do to help us, my. team, everyone here, to keep this show. free, to keep it improving year over.
year and week over week, it is just to. hit that subscribe button and to double. check if you've hit it. Only thing I'll. ever ask of you. Do we have a deal? If you do it, I'll tell you what I'll. do. I'll make sure. every single week, every single month, we fight harder and harder and harder. and harder to bring you the guests and. conversations that you want to hear. I've stayed true to that promise since. the very beginning of The Diary of a. CEO, and I will not let you down. Please. help us. Really appreciate it. Let's get. on with the show. >> [music and singing]. >> John Lennox, yes, you've published over. 70 peer-reviewed mathematical papers,
co-authored two research texts at the. Oxford Mathematical Monograph Series, and you've really become a pioneer in. many domains through your career. But, for anyone that doesn't know you, what. is the most important context they need. to understand the reference points, experience, education that you're. pulling on. that that is going to inform all of the. subjects we talk about today. >> I mean, I've written a number of papers. I got a certain amount of. international recognition. I chaired.
Oxford and all the rest of it. But, I. think the real value of that. has been the training in logic. Really saying that mathematics works. The fact that it works is for me one of. the strongest evidences that this is. what I call a word-based universe. We can use mathematics to describe. things about how the universe works. Thinking God's thoughts after him, Kepler's famous statement. But, also,
we've lived to see a biological. revolution where we discovered biology's. word-based as well with the human. genome. And that to me resonates. with the explanation given in both the. Old Testament and the New. Language of. John's Gospel, "In the beginning was the. word.". >> I am I don't know a ton about the Bible. I do come from a religious family, so. >> Do you? >> with um. >> Right, okay. >> up as Christians. I think I I lost my. face faith at about 18 years old cuz you.
know, me and my my brothers are. extremely good at math. They're very. uh rational thinking, maybe to a fault. And I think maybe I am a little bit, too. >> I am, too. >> You are. This is why I find it so. fascinating cuz you know, typically the. scientific community lean more towards. atheism. >> [clears throat]. >> And typically, I think that. mathematicians. lean more towards atheism. Just to sense. check if that's true or not, we'll throw. the numbers up on the screen. So, I I. find that to be a fascinating. conversation, which I'm looking forward. to have with you today. Interestingly, you wrote this book and.
the word. AI is on it. It says God, AI and the end. of history. Why are you so. concerned, dare I say, about artificial. intelligence as a. leading pioneer in math maths and sort. of philosophical thinking? >> Well, because I'm interested in the. bigger picture. Anything. that raises questions about.
the nature of human identity. And I was. first struck by the drive for artificial. general intelligence. It's really become. one of the It looks as if it's the prime. motivation of people like Sam Altman and. so on. It is really hitting the. headlines. But, within that, there's the notion of transhumanism. >> What does that mean? >> The idea is that we go beyond the human. One of our most famous astronomers, a.
royal, he put it this way. He says, "In the. distant future, it won't be organic. brains. It'll be machine brains." And he. seriously believes, as do a number of. scientists who are not science fiction. authors, that there will be some kind of merger. between humanity and machines to have a. transhuman, something that's beyond the. human, and something that is, they hope, superintelligent,
got all the human properties and much. more. Now, one of the people who's spreading that. kind of transhumanist vision is the. Israeli historian Yuval Noah Harari, and. he's written a book called Homodeus, the. man-god. And that really made me prick up my ears. because I know enough about this book. here in the Bible to realize. that the drive for humans towards.
self-deification. >> Self-deification? >> Yes, making themselves gods. And you see. it all through history. The ancient. Babylonian emperors were regarded as. gods. The Roman emperors started calling. themselves gods and all the rest of it. And what Harari says is the 21st century. has two big purposes. Number one, to solve the problem of physical death. as a technical problem.
>> To solve death? >> Yes, solve death. Physical death is, in. his view, a technical problem and we'll. solve it. The second agenda item, and he. calls them agenda items for the 21st. century, is to increase. human happiness by bioengineering, cyborg engineering, mechanical implants, all this kind of thing, and turning. humans, quote, into gods with a small g. In other.
words, this is the drive for a. superintelligent human. We've only got. started. And his point is, and from his atheist perspective, one. can understand it. Evolution, ungated natural processes. have brought us to this point. Now we're. going to take it into our hands and. we're going to engineer humanity into. the future very rapidly to approach this. superhuman. thing. Now, I hear that and I see that,
but I see that as huge implications. for one of the fundamental teachings. that's behind, I would argue, Western civilization. And that is the notion that humans. like us are made in the image of God as. rational moral beings. Now, I got into. this because some Christian leaders. wanted to have a conference on AI and.
they wanted it introduced from someone. who knew something about the teaching. of the image of God in Genesis. and who had a scientific background and. who could perhaps begin to lead them in. to what was going on in the AI field. around. And once I got into it, I. realized this is a seriously important. thing because. we haven't got to our artificial general. intelligence yet. That's still a pipe.
dream, but it's improving all the time. But we've got far enough. That is to. what's called narrow AGI, [snorts] which. most of the stuff that works is. And that is posing a threat. to human beings at all kinds of levels. And I began to see that that was. seriously important for everybody to. take it board. So I wrote two books, one. 2020, called 2084 is the title of my.
book, Artificial Intelligence and of of. humanity. And then. the publishers asked me to update it in. 2024. So, there's a second edition twice. as big. And it is my main work on AI. That is not. That is a work on the Book. of Revelation with reference to AI. The. other is directly going into AI, pointing out its values, which I think. are immense, particularly in medicine,
but pointing out its dangers, which I. think are immense, for bringing about a. state in the world that none of us, I. think, want. >> So, let me just give some definitions, then. >> Yeah, sure. >> You use the term narrow AI. >> Yes. >> Um my definition of that is, and I'll. put something on the screen for those of. you watching, is AI that's focused on. solving a very particular problem. So, AIs that might be able to diagnose lung. cancer, or that do some sort of um. biometric data on your Apple Watch, very.
focused on solving a particular problem. AGI is artificial general intelligence, which is what's being built at the. moment, and all the big AI companies are. in a race to accomplish, which is a. machine that could do any intellectual. task a human can, faster than any human, um and would be super intelligent. So, that, you know, maybe one way to think. about it, it would have a PhD in. everything. >> That's right. That's a very fair. summary. Narrow AI system does one and. only one thing that normally requires.
human intelligence. AGI does the lot. and more. >> You wrote this book, 2084. You. highlighted in there some of the. concerns that you think are being. overlooked in this race for AGI at the. moment. >> Well, they're not overlooked by. everybody. There is huge concern. There's been a very interesting book. published not long ago by Karen Hao. >> Oh, she was here. She's fantastic. >> Well, there you are. And she has got. some very interesting metaphors. Uh the.
pursuit of the machine God, which I. think is a brilliant summary of what's. going on. And I found it very. illuminating because she's obviously got. very close to the the major operators in. this. But if I step back from it, I look at AI like a knife. A good knife, you can use it for surgery or you can. use it for murder. And that leads us into it immediately. AI, narrow, brilliant for picking out a.
terrorist in a football crowd. Also brilliant for suppressing a. minority in China. and bringing in a totalitarian state. through social credit systems and all. the rest of it. And in a way, we're sleepwalking into a future where. we are gradually seeding control and. information and data all the time, which. could be used by bad actors against us.
And this is the problem. >> I I really this question of what it. means to be human in a world of AI, I. think it's been really front of mind for. a lot of people. And like, where do we. live or exist or find our purpose in a. world where theoretically these super. intelligent systems will reach AGI, which means they're more intelligent. theoretically than any human on Earth. But at the same time, you've got these. other. advancements in technology like humanoid. robots. >> Mhm. >> Where these humanoid robots there was a.
a live stream I've talked about a few. times that I'll just throw it up on the. screen really quickly that shows last. week a humanoid robot working on a. production line for 8 days straight. And. they show it up against a human being. and it beats the human being on the. production line cuz it doesn't need to. sleep. It just needs to be charged. for a couple of hours to full power. And. so you combine these two forces, super. intelligence and the disruption, you. know, you can think of it like. one is disrupting. this thing here, the brain, and the.
intelligence within the brain. And then. the other technology that's. emerged at the same time is disrupting. my muscles and my mechanics. And the two. come together to make voilĂ . >> Absolutely. So, you face joblessness at. all kinds of levels. And people are only going beginning to. realize the implications of that. And. not just low-level repetitive jobs, as. high-level jobs like lawyers. And. there's a deep-seated.
ethical problem running through all of. this. And it's very simple one. It's. that technology advances much faster. than the ethics that's needed to. underpin it. And the difficulty is the people that. have all the power will say, "Well, we. need some ethical control of all of. this. But we need to get on with the. research to make it safe for you. So, let us get on with it." And. you can be a bit skeptical about the. motivation there. It's a colossal power.
grab. And I do feel that. uh the Christian faith has a great deal. to say to this arms race, if you like. The. power that is being. forced in to having a technology that. becomes the ultimate source of truth. Now, those two concepts, power and. truth, clashed centuries ago in a very. famous trial. And it's the trial of Jesus. >> [snorts]. >> And I used to wonder a lot, you know,
why is there such detail about the trial. of Jesus? Until I realized what it was. about. Jesus was put on trial for political. terrorism, to put it in modern. terminology. He was a threat to the. Roman power base. And Pilate, the governor at the time, put him on trial and conducted the trial. himself, which was most unusual, and. said, "Are you a king?". And Jesus looked at him and said, "Well,
not in the sense you mean. To this end I was born and to this end I. came into the world that I would bear. witness to the truth.". And uh Pilate famously responded, "What. is truth?". and went out and declared Jesus innocent. of the charge. And then he said to him, just a bit later, "Don't you know I have. power to crucify you?" And Jesus quietly. said, "You would have no power against. me unless it's been given to you from.
above." So, there's one of the most. famous confrontations between power and. truth. And that statement that Jesus made, "I have come to bear witness to the. truth." I regard that as the main. motivation for my life. I'm trying to. bear witness to truth as I see it at all. kinds of levels in my own limited way. And that's what bothers me about AI. It's a reductionist. We're reducing. people to machines. And you said to me a.
few moments ago that [snorts] flagged up. a [clears throat] thing in my mind. that's very important. We need to be. very clear what AI is and what it isn't. This is a machine. Machines do not think. Machines do not have qualia. They do not. understand the redness of red. They do. not experience emotion. They have no. consciousness. And you see, I believe that the genius.
of God is that he's made you and me. And he's connected. in us. consciousness. and intelligence. The machines are not conscious, but they simulate intelligence. And [snorts] the experts are very clear. that they're not trying to construct. intelligence for a very simple reason. They have no idea what consciousness is. from a scientific point of view. But they're trying to simulate. intelligence and go as far as they can.
And therefore, the danger is we anthropomorphize. everything. We treat them as if they're. conscious beings. And we need to step back and realize. that we are conscious beings. And that. gives us a supreme dignity and value. To. reduce ourselves to merely machines or. on the other hand merely [clears throat]. animals is to demean our value. And then. where are you going to get value from?
>> I've got a quote here that's linked to. what you just said. It's from Yuval Noah. Harari. He mentioned he says, "Humans. are now hackable animals.". >> Yes. >> The whole idea that humans have this. soul or spirit and they have free will. and nobody knows what's happening inside. them. That is over. And Sam Altman said the most successful. founders do not set out to create. companies. They're on a mission to. create something closer to a religion. And at some point it turns out that. forming a company is the easiest way to. do so. And lastly, a former Google.
engineer said, "What is going to be. created will effectively be a god. It's. not a god in the sense that it will will. make lightning or cause hurricanes. But. if there is something a billion times. smarter than the smartest human, what else can you call it? >> Heads on. Thank you for quoting that. because I was going to quote it to you. The Sam Altman's point about about. making a religion. And that is what is happening and people. pointed out the obvious. Here you have a.
system even now that has got some of the. qualities we normally associate with. God. It appears to be omniscient. You. can ask it any question. It is omnipresent through the internet, etc., etc. And therefore, already. there are worship groups to worship AI. And some people welcome this and say, "Well, this is the way we should go.". And other people say, "Just wait a. moment. There's [snorts] something very. strange going on here." And in the end,
you are bowing down to something that in. the end is idolatrous because it is less. than God. But it's very tempting to do. that. >> I mean, people are basically praying to. it now. They're confiding in it in a way. that they might have. >> Perhaps absolutely doing it. And you. know, I'm fascinated by this. I've never seen. one of these before, but I like it. Let. me tell you why I like it. >> So, for people that can't see what we're. doing, it's a brain. >> It's a brain. And it's got two halves.
And one of the people who've influenced. my thinking about AI a lot. is uh Dr. Iain McGilchrist, the author. of this fascinating book called The. Matter with Things. And he has studied. the fact that this brain has two. hemispheres. >> Mhm. >> Two halves. Both halves are involved in. almost every cognitive event, but the. two different halves have different ways. of paying attention to the world. One is.
narrow focus, the left side of the. brain. And the other is the big picture. And he says what has happened. historically in the West is for the last. five or so hundred years, we have. concentrated. on the narrow, rationalist, reductionist, left side of the brain. And we've forgotten the right side that. contextualizes everything. So that, quote, we now find ourselves in a world where.
we understand how almost everything. works, but we know the meaning of. nothing. >> [snorts]. >> And what he calls for is to open the. sphere up. And of course that includes. to beauty, culture, art, music, and. religion. Step by step he appears to be. creating more room for God because God. makes sense of the space he feels is. very necessary to fulfill. And I find.
that absolutely fascinating. And you've. probably noticed that too, the number of. intellectuals who are step by step. taking. the Christian faith more seriously as. giving a rational account of what's. going on that makes very big sense of. the big picture. >> What is going on in society because it. does feel like more and more people have. these sort of existential questions. about meaning and they might be turning. to Christianity or Islam or other. But. what is from a 30,000 foot perspective.
happening to us which is making us ask. some of these questions? And for you know, younger generations it. might be spirituality, however they. define that. But there's certainly a. a macro picture here of something. happening. >> Oh, there is. I agree with you entirely. and I think it's because we've had. pushed at us for too long a very. reductionist view of the world. It's. nothing but physics and chemistry. It's. nothing but this and that. And people rightly feel it's too small a. world to live in. They're looking to.
break out of this. Isn't there a bigger. picture that. can make sense of my world and make. sense of my life and giving some meaning. because if you reduce everything, it. ends up a black hole of meaninglessness. And that's one of my. uh top reasons for not being an atheist. because it destroys rationality by. almost by definition. Because it tells. me that my brain. which does all the thinking is not my.
mind, it's connected, and those are two. different things, and that's another big. story. But, this is the end product of a. mindless, unguided uh process. And, I. have fun with scientists, you know, sometimes. I ask them uh about the brain. and how it arose, and they tell me. something like that. And, I said, "And, you trust it?". Tell me, "If the computer that you use every day, if you knew it was the end product of a. random process, would you trust it?".
Every single scientist, and some of them. are very high-powered, that I've asked. that question to have said, "No, I would. not." So, I say, "You've got a problem, haven't you? Your atheism goes too far. It undermines. the very rationality we need. to do science, let alone to believe in. atheism. And, [snorts]. that's my main beef with people like. Richard Dawkins and the new atheists,
but I see they're fading. They're. fading. So, here's the irony. Atheism, claiming rationality, destroys. it. Whereas, I believe the Christian faith. also claims rationality, in all in the. sense that. evidence-based. We shout about that a. lot in science and medicine, and rightly. so. What we trust in ought to be. evidence-based. I claim exactly the same. thing for Christianity. And, that's why. I'm a Christian, because I believe the. evidence supports it. Otherwise, I.
wouldn't. >> So, I guess how do I identify? Maybe as. someone that's agnostic? Like, I'm I. don't really know. >> Well, that's okay. But, does that mean you're open to know? You'd like to know? >> Well, that's. >> I'm always open. >> That's that's wonderful to see. That's. That seems to me to be exactly the right. attitude. Jesus actually challenged someone in his. day and says if anyone wants to do the.
will of God, he shall know. of the teaching whether I'm speaking for. myself or whether it's from God. I. notice what it doesn't say. He doesn't. say if anyone wants to know, he will. know. If anyone wants to do, he will know. And. the difference between the two, and I'd. be interested in your response to it, is. that being prepared to do something when. you know it. is more than just knowing it and. possibly just leaving it on the table.
In other words, Jesus is interested in. people who are going to take the step of. trust and following him. And that's the. big deal. >> There should be a button just down below. here. And if it says subscribe, you're. already subscribed. If it says subscribe. buh, that means you're not yet. And if. you're not subscribed, please could you. do us a favor and hit that button. It. helps to show more than you know. And. according to the algorithm, you're. someone that watches our show, but you. haven't yet hit that button. Thank you. so much. Do you know what it is? I find all I. find all explanations as to like the.
bigger picture to be like fundamentally. incomplete. >> Yes. >> Because there's many things you said. about the nature of Christianity and. religion that I go, "Amazing. Yes. Yes. Yes." And then there's a couple things I. go, "Ooh, well, hmm.". Uh and the same when I sit here with a. physicist that's telling me about the. Big Bang. >> Yes. >> I have the same thing where I'm going, "Yes. Yes, of course. Yes. Oh, we've got. evidence that the universe is expanding. Okay, mate." And then they'll say other. things and I go, "Well, that's not. complete.". And so I find myself sat on the fence. I. would love you to convince me. I mean, it's not your responsibility to do so,
but where does that journey of. of believing begin for someone like me? Because, you know, people say the Bible. and I go, "Well, it's kind of like what. you said about the computers. It's like. if you're using something to justify. the same thing is true, >> Yes. >> then that's circular reasoning I find to. be incomplete cuz I could write on this. piece of paper, uh Steven Bartlett is a lizard. >> Yes. >> And. this piece of paper is true. And then.
you then use that same piece of paper to. justify the validity of that same piece. of paper. >> Mhm. >> And I go, "Well, that's that's not solid. reasoning.". >> No, but you see, I could say, "Steven. Bartlett, there's a red Ferrari parked in the. street outside.". >> Yeah. >> And it's yours if you want to take it. We could sit and discuss it. for a thousand years. You would never. know whether I was true or not unless. you went and looked. >> Mhm.
>> And it seems to me. the word skeptic is a very interesting. one. I regard myself as a skeptic, but. in Greek, skeptai means to look at. something from a distance. Now, if you are ever going to get to know a. person, you've got to begin to give up your. distance. You will know that from. everyday life. >> Mhm. >> And it seems to me one of the things to. try to begin to grasp is God is not a.
proposition or a philosophy or even a. religion. God is a person. And as a person, he has entered our. world. However incredible that may seem, although this is the irony of the Harari. position, if I may just say it on the. side, people come to me as they've done. with their transhumanist [clears throat]. agenda and say, "You know, we're going. to solve the problem of death and we're. going to increase human happiness." And. I look at them and I smile and I say, "You're too late.".
And they say, "What? We haven't got. there yet." I said, "You're too late.". "What do you mean we're too late?" Well, I said, "The problem of physical death. was solved when God raised Christ from. the dead 20 centuries ago. And as for human happiness and uploading. us into eternity, You know, I'm waiting. for the biggest uploading that's ever. going to happen in history when Christ. returns and raises me from the dead. because that is precisely what he. promises. And it's most interesting. watching people.
And I say, "Isn't it fascinating that. your transhumanism consists in humans. reaching out to become little gods? Whereas Christianity is the exact. opposite. It talks about a God who. became human so that he could give us. life and give us a new relationship with. him. What really completes the circle. for me. is that my relationship with God is a. relationship which is based.
on the solution to the really hard. problem. And that is the problem that. I. by nature. have not always done good. And by my own standards, I've failed. Now, all this talk of transhumanism, AI, and everything else, what it's trying to. do is to build paradise, utopia, without. facing the problem of the damage that. humans have caused to themselves and one.
another. They will not face the sin. problem. Christianity. to me doesn't compete with any anything. else. because Christ offers me something. nobody else offers me. Nobody else offers me peace. The peace. of knowing that I have real forgiveness. The peace of knowing that I have a. friend and a companion to whom I can. talk all the time. That's been so. meaningful in my life as I spell out in. detail my autobiography.
And the peace of having been given a new. life that will not end when I die. I'm. 82 now and probably more than twice as. old as you are. As I look towards the. future, I have in my heart a certainty. Not because I've merited it. The exact opposite, because I couldn't. merit it, but because Christ has done. something for me through the cross and. the resurrection. That may sound all. mumbo jumbo at the moment. But has done.
something that enables me to have a. relationship that is secure, that floods. over the whole of life and has made my. life what it is for the last. 70 years, more or less. >> I think everybody, especially in a world. that's getting increasingly lonely and. disconnected and isolated for many. reasons, is looking for that secure. relationship. >> They are. >> They're looking for their own, you know, a home that can't fall down. >> Yes. Yes, and a peace that doesn't fade and a.
an inheritance that doesn't Exactly. You're dead right. >> If I could choose that, if I could press. a button and have it, I would have it. But there's this other part of my brain. which. will naturally interrogate whether it's. real. or it's true. >> right. Why am I sitting in front of you talking. about this stuff? Because I've. interrogated myself about it and it's. truth for. over 70 years. I've made myself totally vulnerable.
That's why I got into all the debates. with new atheists and all the rest of. it, because I want to be sure. But it. won't come. about by pressing a button. It will come about. if you're open enough to say, "God, I'm. open. Reveal yourself to me and I'm. prepared to take the steps. that I feel are leading me onto solid. ground." I do not believe that this is a. process of taking a leap into the dark, but it's making a commitment on the.
basis of what you know already and. taking a step further forward. And the. interesting thing about this is. the trust that's at the heart of. everything. I trust my wife. I've been married to. her for 58 years this year. It's evidence-based trust. I don't trust. for no reason. And the [snorts] same is true of my. friends, as would be the case with you.
Evidence-based trust in science. and in Christian things. I don't regard. myself as religious particularly, and. the reason is this, and it's an. important reason. Most religions prescribe a moral way. that you try to follow, and you have teachers, gurus, imams, all. the rest, priests, to keep you on the. way, and then you come to a judgment at. the end. And I usually draw a scale of. justice. And if your good deeds tip over.
the bad deeds, then you get into. whatever it is, heaven, nirvana, all the. rest of it. That's religion. It's not. Christianity, though many people think. it is. Because if you ask them, "Are you a. Christian?" they'll say, "Well, I do my. best, and I hope that God will be kind.". That isn't Christianity. It's the exact. opposite of Christianity. That's a. merit-based religion. And you see, the irony of all this is is. that we would never, at least I don't.
know, some people might, but in a human. relationship, we don't base our affection and. relationship with someone on the basis. of their merit. I have a little analogy. I use that sometimes tickles people's. minds. I say that I met a beautiful girl. on my second day at Cambridge. I'd been warned she might be there, and. she was, sitting in church. And. I decided that I'd like to marry her.
So, I bought the most expensive cookery book. I could and I came and I handed to her. and she said, "What's that?" Well, I. said, "You know, we have a interesting. tradition in our family, you see. And if anybody gets married, they give. the potential bride a cookbook." "Why?". "Well, look at page 152. Here's the. the laws for making an apple cake and I. like apple cakes. So, law 1 2 2 2 takes. a what's flour, sugar, sugar." Now, I. said, "It's going to be like this. If you keep those rules for the next,
let's be generous, 40 years or so, I. will accept you. Otherwise, you can go back to your. mother." Now, when I say that to an. audience, they rock about with laughter, but it's exactly the way many of them. have been taught to think about God. Keep the rules as best as you can. and hope that God is generous. When. actually. I did no such thing, have given my wife. several cookbooks, but they're not the. basis of the relationship.
>> [snorts]. >> And because the relationship is based on. acceptance that comes at the start of. the common journey, it sets her free to live and do other. things that she wants to do. >> [snorts]. >> And I have noticed often that once. people begin to realize that, they're. beginning to understand a basic concept. which is grace. That God does. everything. And if we trust him, he does that gives. us the certainty. So, it's not arrogance.
to accept it from him. It's arrogance. actually to reject and say, "Oh, no, no, I'll go my own way and I'll try my best. and hope that you will accept me." And. the heart of the Christian message which. I believe is there. is that the trust is based on what. someone else has done, what Christ has. done, not what I have done. And that's. what's given me the power and as I said. earlier, completed the circle and. enabled me to live.
>> That was a really beautiful description. and definition of what the Christian. faith is about. It still leaves me with a question about. whether it's true. And this is the sort of central question. that I need to find my way over. >> Yeah, I agree with you. Absolutely. >> And this is I find myself often I've sat. with a few uh Christian apologists and. asked them similar questions about like. how do I know if it's true? And I guess so so far I've got, you. know, if there's a red Ferrari outside,
you'd have to go outside and see for. yourself. That's the only way you're. going to know. But what. how do you know that this thing you've. committed yourself to and you've. believed and you know talked about for. 70 years of your life. is true? And could it be the case that. it's not true? >> Okay, let's handle that. That's a hugely. important question. I have two approaches to this which I. call roughly speaking objective and. subjective. And it depends entirely where someone's. coming from. They may start very far.
back and say, "Look, we read about this. chap Jesus. How do we know he ever. existed?" Well, then you go to the. ancient historians and you find that. most of them, whether they're atheists. or not, believe that he existed and so. on. >> I accept that he existed. >> Yes. >> Yeah. >> Okay, well, that's a good start. You. know, some of the disciples when Jesus. rose from the dead, they just didn't. believe the story. Ridiculous. And there's a famous story of Thomas. who said to the others, he said, "Unless. I see the marks in his hands and so on,
I won't believe." And then Jesus stood. among them. and. he didn't. make fun of Thomas's objective. He said, "Thomas, come and have a look.". You never know what swimming is until. you get into the water. Isn't that true? >> It is true. >> And. all I can say is that step by step, keep. asking your questions. Absolutely. I don't believe that God will ever ask. us to take a step.
with which we should be uncomfortable. I. just don't believe that. >> Could you be wrong that Christianity So, could it be the case that Christianity. was. was about a real guy called Jesus? Uh based on a real guy called Jesus, but. the stories told, you know, there was. decades passed between the things that. happened and people. >> Not so much as you'd think, actually. >> You think what? For four decades for the. first time? >> When you When you say to me, "Could you. be wrong?". My academic mind says theoretically,
yes. But practically, no. Could I be wrong? It would be like. asking me, "John, you know, you've been. married to Sally for 58 years. Could you be wrong that she loves you?". Well, theoretically, yes. But actually, the evidence all points in the other. direction. And that's what I would say. that I have built up in my life. And I'd. love you to ask me that question when. you've read that autobiography.
>> Why would you think it would reach. >> Because I I think what I relate there is. enough evidence for someone outside. who's skeptical. to say there may well be something in. that. But in the end, you won't know. until you step into the water. And then you find that Christ is there. to catch you. >> And what did you find in the water when. you stepped into the water? >> Well, I was very young. You see, my. parents taught me quite clearly that. I wasn't born a Christian. You become a.
Christian by trusting Christ. That's. To have somebody born or made a. Christian by some ceremony is absurd to. my mind. And so, in my simple way, I responded as a child. I didn't have. any great feelings or anything else. But. what happened to me as I grew and. especially as I went to university in. Cambridge and I decided, "Look, I really. believe this stuff is true. I'm going to stand for it.".
And it was when I began to stand and. share with others that. a great deal of the underpinning came in. and the certainty came. Cumulatively, not all a big I've never. had these big. flashes of anything, but I. have had several experiences of what I. can only put down to direct. divine guidance [clears throat] and I. record them in the book. >> Never talked to any founders, they all.
carry the same belief that the biggest. threat to their small business is having. a bad product. It's not. The biggest. threat they face is hiring the wrong. person for their small team because bad. hires put the handbrake on growth and. rapidly infect company culture. And I. get it. When you're starting out, you. need A-players to grow your company, but. you don't have 40 spare hours to spend. sifting through interviews. So you hire. fast to fill the seat, but this ends up. costing you even more in the long term. What any small business actually needs. is a reliable and efficient way to find. the right talent without stalling. momentum. That's where our long-term.
sponsor LinkedIn and LinkedIn Hiring Pro. can help you. It streamlines the entire. hiring process from drafting a job. description to shortlisting candidates. and conducting AI-powered interviews for. initial screenings. Nearly 60% of hirers. who've used this tool have found it to. interview within a week. Hire right the. first time around and get started by. posting your first job for free at. linkedin.com/doac. That's linkedin.com/doac. Terms and conditions apply. If I asked you to picture a Guinness.
World Record Holder right now, you would. not be picturing a phone charger. company. But our sponsor Anker, yes, the. charger brand and one of our technology. partners, just set a world record. Their. Soundcore earbuds hold the Guinness. World Record for the world's clearest. calls. Did you hear that? That is what. obsession sounds like. Most brands think. that earbuds are as good as they can be, so they compete on the surface. They. compete on bass, battery, colors, but.
not Anker. The Liberty 5 Pro and Pro Max. earbuds use 10 sensors and Anker's own. AI chip to help you keep your voice. clear in noisy places, which sounds like. an unreasonable amount of engineering. for a small problem, until it's your. problem, until you're trying to win a. pitch from an airport lounge or station. platform, and all they can hear is wind. or traffic. Anker obsessed over the. tiny, invisible, maddening, difficult. environments that we find ourselves in. all the time and how those environments.
stand in the way of the communication. that we want to have. And when you try. Anker for the first time, you, like me, will probably think, "Thank god that. somebody cared this much." Click the. link below to try them for yourself now. I've got some some of the questions that. really stumped me when I was So, I was I. was Christian up until the age of about. 18. Then I went into the whole like new. atheist movement with Richard Dawkins. and Sam Harris and that little phase of. my life. But one of the stats that used. to get me when I went through that new. atheist movement. was that.
globally, 91% of adults simply adopt and. keep the religion they were raised in. And if a person is born into a Hindu or. Muslim household, there is a 99%. statistical probability they will remain. in that faith. Only 1% switch out. And. then the argument, I think it came from. Dawkins or someone else, was that. is it fair that there's this birth. lottery determining who ends up. believing what or theoretically getting. into hell or heaven? >> Yes. >> Because if I was born in, I don't know,
Afghanistan, the probability says I'd. probably be Muslim. >> Yeah, well, I I take that. Absolutely. >> So, God gave you an advantage in this. context because he he he allowed you to. be born. his in his all-knowing, all all. understanding way, put you to be born in. a place where you were likely to be. Christian. >> to me as if he gave the same advantage. to you. >> [laughter]. >> So, the question is, what do we do with. that privilege? Now, I know. that there are hard problems around the.
edge here. There are really hard. problems, not only where you're born and. what you believe. This was the argument that Peter Singer. advanced to me. He had a debate. I don't. know whether you've heard about it. Peter Singer, you know, the. Princeton ethicist who. really was one of the new atheists, but. not quite. Very famous for his views on. dealing with the unborn and the rest. Well, we had a debate in Australia, and. I started, as I always do, by being.
upfront about my background. And he, when he got the chance to speak, he said, "Well, there was my. best objection to religion. People. always stay in the religion which. they're brought up, you see." When I. next got a chance to speak, I said, "Peter, I told the audience. about my Christian background, but you. said nothing about yours. Now, tell me, were your parents atheists?". He said, "They were." "Oh," I said,
"then you remained in the faith in which. you were brought up." "Oh," but he said, "it isn't a faith." And I said, "Peter, I was I was convinced that you believed. it.". I brought the house down, of course. This cyberspace went mad. And the point was made repeatedly all. over the internet. Here's one of the. world's top philosophers. He doesn't. understand that his atheism is a belief. system. And the irony was the very first person. he met after that debate was a fellow.
Hungarian Jew. who was a friend of mine. And then my. friend said, "And I became a Christian.". So, the very first person he met was. someone who had transitioned from his. background. That doesn't answer your. question. It's a question I ask often. >> because God could correct this. >> Well, this is just the point. And we. have had these arguments and debates. a good God and all powerful God would.
could should all this kind of stuff. And. we never get. a satisfactory answer to that. So, I've. come up with another problem possibly. because I'm a mathematician and we when. we've hammered at one problem for. centuries. we usually stop and try a little one. My. other problem is just as hard but I. think it gets me a bit further. It's. this. every world view must face. a mixed picture. I call it beauty and barbed wire or. beauty and bombs. That that's the world.
It's mixed and if you don't accept that. you're not in touch with reality. Now, here's my question. Is there anywhere evidence. enough. to trust God with that situation? That's a hard question. >> And by that you mean the situation of. this sort of geographical distribution. of belief? >> Yes, we'll never understand it or solve. it. >> But do we trust God? >> Do we trust God ultimately to be.
absolutely [clears throat]. fair because if God isn't fair in the. end, he knows what everybody thinks I. believe. And we'll be surprised maybe at. what he does because he can measure how. much people know. My responsibility is. twofold. One. to respond to the evidence I've heard. and then Christ tells me to go and share. it. And that's what I do and have been doing. all my life. >> [snorts]. >> It doesn't answer a question, but.
it gives you motivation, and. the alternative to rule God out has so. many uh negatives to it that. >> I think I think yes, so when I think. about what I understand of the Bible, there's a particular part of the Bible. that talks about. the only way into heaven is through. Jesus, and other from that I inferred. that the only way to get into this great. place that everybody wants to go to is. by believing. >> But does everybody want to go to? I'm. not sure that they do. I I have met many.
people who when they hear what Christ. offers, they reject it. But that's. that's that's another point. >> So, if if we talk about this. distribution. >> Yeah. >> sort of birthright distribution of what. you believe, um and then those that. believe this one particular thing are. going to get into this heaven, it may it feels unfair. Or. this idea that only those that believe. get in is wrong. Or. God is not as nice as we thought, and.
he's playing a bit of a cruel game. >> a fair bit going for your logic there, I. I I think. Um. I think there are aspects of this we. don't understand, because. to give a crude example of this, I. expect to meet Abraham. and Moses, but they didn't know about. Jesus. >> Cuz they were before. >> Yes. >> Mhm. >> When I approach this, you said you're. agnostic. I like that word. Uh. >> [clears throat]. >> people rarely ask me if I'm agnostic.
But what I'm telling you is I'm agnostic. about masses of things. It's how I. learn. >> Mhm. >> [clears throat]. >> Uh ginosko in Greek just means I don't. know. >> Yeah. >> And. uh once you take the other step in. saying I don't know and you can't know, it then becomes illogical because if you. don't know, how can you know that I. can't know? And I always remember the. words of Richard Feynman, who was a. brilliant Nobel Prize winning physicist. You probably heard of Richard Feynman, who said, "Bend over backwards to. criticize yourself, because you are the.
easiest person for yourself to deceive.". >> Amen. >> He was dead right. And. that's why I love exploring these. things. And I feel honored to talk to. someone who's so refreshing. I think. there's great hope for our culture. And people like yourself exploring and. sharing. with the world the conclusions that. you've come to and the people that. you're interacting with. >> Yeah, like I said, I have no I don't.
have perfect answers either way, so. that's why the word agnostic seems to be. perfectly apt. Um, the other real. question that I had. that really stumped me when I was 18. years old was this point about. omniscience. >> Yes. >> I mean, it's the oldest question in in. the sort of atheist religious battle, which is if God is all knowing, he knew. exactly which individuals would reject. him and suffer. um, and go to hell before he even. created them. >> Yeah, that's determinism. >> So, how is creating a soul that you know. is doomed.
um, an act of love? >> Well, it doesn't. I don't go for that determinism. In. fact, I've written a book that thick. about it. >> I think it was actually Ricky Gervais. telling the story of the. the baby being in born in let's say it's. Africa or somewhere else or India or. wherever it might be, UK, who is born. with a parasite eating its eyeball out. from the inside. >> I know this, yeah. >> And I remember hearing that when I was. 18. >> Yeah, terrible. >> And thinking, okay, so if God's all. knowing, he knew that that baby was.
going to have its eye eaten out by a. parasite before the baby was born, but. allowed the baby to be born anyway. And with my moral compass, I would have. intervened. And if he's omnipotent or. powerful, he could have. So, how do you these Where is the flaw. in that. question? Is there a flaw? Is there a misunderstanding? >> I I think there can be a. misunderstanding, but it's a very. understandable one because I feel. exactly the weight of that as well. My question that I set out a few minutes.
ago, is there any evidence anywhere. that God you can trust God with it. And. the major piece of evidence to my mind. is the cross of Christ. And if Christ. really is God who he claimed to be, this. is God's suffering. And why is God suffering? Well, it. certainly tells me that he hasn't. remained distant from human suffering, but has himself become part of it. Now, that's not an answer. There are no. simplistic answers here. But you see,
once you remove God, that child, there's no hope for it. It's. dead, gone, out, nothing. But suppose God can compensate that. child because he has the power to raise. from the dead as he did with Jesus. That changes everything for me. The universe without a resurrection. I don't know whether you've ever watched. my debate, the first one with Richard. Dawkins. >> I suspect I have. I watched them all. >> last bit of it, we were suddenly told.
we'd only 2 minutes to wrap up instead. of nine each. And I said something about the. resurrection. And I never forget what. Richard said. It was something like. this. We've had a great discussion. [clears throat] about big ideas and so. on. And now we come down to the resurrection. of Jesus. How petty. How parochial. How unworthy of the. universe. And I remember thinking, if Jesus rose from the dead, it's the.
biggest thing that's ever happened. because it may. open the way to understanding. that there is life after death. And you. see, C. S. Lewis has helped me a lot. I. used to listen to him. I'm that old. >> [snorts]. >> He has helped me a lot in this idea of. ascension which there is more than one. world. And we're so conditioned to. thinking that this world is the only one. there is. But if there is another world. and there is a loving God, then I.
suspect, I can't prove this to you, but when we one day see and enter that. world. and see what God has done with the kind. of child you mentioned, we'll have no. more questions. >> So you think he's compensated that. child? >> Oh, yes. God is a god of love. He'll do much. better than Look, the biggest gift that. God has given you and me. is. our moral sense and the capacity to.
love. Now, we analyze problems like this. with. our God-given capacities. And. we come. and I understand it perfectly well. because I've come to the same place as. you. and say, "Well, God, if I'd been you, I. would have done this.". Well, I suspect one day we're going to. find out why God didn't.
He's going to let me die one day. I've. nearly died died already. I've said. goodbye to my wife for the way. and they thought they weren't going 14. years ago. And I said goodbye and it's interesting. when things like that hit you. Forgive. the personal reference, but it's very. real. Total peace both of us had. as I went into the operating theater. and the surgeon saved my life. And this. would take us down another rabbit hole, but I got to New Zealand just a few days.
after the earthquake. and I was on a lecture tour and. everything was scrapped. I was on. television, radio, but only one topic, why earthquakes? >> [snorts]. >> You see. And I met people that had lost. loved ones and all this kind of thing. And I talked about the God who has. suffered and raised Jesus from the dead. And the interesting thing was it was. that. that gave the most hope to the people. that were listening to me because they. told me and wrote me little letters.
afterwards and so on. So, I I think. there's something big here, but that God. allows these things to happen is. something that in the end we have to. take on board, even when they happen to. us. >> What about all the um the humans that. lived before Jesus came? >> Well, God will never judge anybody for. not knowing what they didn't know. >> Interesting. That's an interesting idea. So, I don't. know. >> [laughter]. >> So, am I good? Am I getting to heaven?
>> No one is good but God. You see, >> Is it important for me to believe in. >> know a great deal. That's obvious to me. You do know a. great deal. You know what this is all. about. And in a sense you've been very. near. at the beginning. And you're now doing. an exploration. And I mean your life. story is that you must write your. autobiography sometime. But wait wait a. few years. >> Yeah, I mean I think I need a few more. experiences. >> Yes, but you will get them. I I I really.
believe that the openness is the. important thing. >> Yeah. >> Quiz people. Put your Christian friends. under the. >> Yes, I know. I know. [laughter]. It's lovely to find someone who's. prepared to do that, quite frankly. >> Is it important that I believe in God? Like if I live a good life and I'm kind. to people and I do my best. >> see, that's exactly the point I was. making. That people think that living a. good life and being kind to people is. what God is interested in. When God has.
prepared for us. a relationship with himself through. Christ that deals with. the forgiveness of sins that we all. made. Forgive me using a hackneyed. phrase, but that's it. And will give us a new life and a power. to live, a new power. You know, it's all very well saying I do good and. I do this and do the other thing, but we. don't have the power to live as we. should.
If we compare ourselves to the Sermon on. the Mount for a week, we'll soon realize. that we're lacking. And. I I think one of the big changes comes. in people as they realize just the depth. of what they might be capable of. And possibly the depths of some things. that sadly they do. and are facing a a big need of. forgiveness. You meet many of them in. prisons, of course, but. I I have seen such remarkable things.
happen both [snorts] directly with. people who've made such a mess of life. and God has met them even in death row. in Russia and places like that. where I was able to go because I speak. the language to a certain extent. Again, that I find tremendously powerful. evidence that God is at work in these. people's lives. >> It is. statistically the case that the more. hopeless your life becomes the higher. the probability you have of turning to.
um a religion. And also, if you're. having a crisis of meaning in your life. for whatever reason, I looked at some of. the data and it does show that. >> That's absolutely right and that's what. you'd expect if the efforts true at. least a certain extent. It gives that. people something outside themselves. that's simple psychology, I would have. thought. >> Simple psychology. >> And it doesn't prove the truth or. falsehood. >> the truth because what if I believe in. dragging at the bottom of the garden. >> I know. Leprechauns. >> if you're Irish. >> And it seems to be the case that really. irrespective of which religion you.
you know fills that you know place in. your life, you still get the same boost. in meaning post starting to believe. >> Well, I'm not convinced of that, you. see. Because I'm sitting here as a. Christian, and I've reason for being a. Christian because I don't find this need. met in those. practitioners of other religions. I. don't find that sense of fulfillment and. peace uh that comes through the. forgiveness in Christ. Now, when I say. that, I need to guard that very carefully.
because one of the troubles. in and you will probably have realized. this in talking about different. religions is that once you begin to. criticize a religion, people rightly think you're looking down. at them. And so I clear the ground completely by. saying that. a pagan or a person in any religion. could put me to shame by their moral. behavior. In raising questions.
about what is taught by a particular. religion, I'm not criticizing your moral. stance. And C.S. Lewis helped me greatly. there. He wrote a book in the 1940s. where he tackled, I think, 40 different. religions and philosophies, and in every. one of them he found the golden rule. Do. unto others what you would And he points. out that this is uh morally. hardwired in into your system. So that. when I'm talking to people of other.
faiths and ask these questions, I I'm. very careful to say that at the. beginning. But. we've got to face the fact that there. are differences. My Jewish friends. believe that Jesus died and did not. rise. My Muslim friends believed he. didn't die. I believe he both died and. rose. Those three things cannot. simultaneously true. >> But when I look at the stats here, data. shows that devout Muslims and a devout. Hindu get the exact same psychological. meaning boost and sense of peace as a.
devout Christian. >> Well, how do you measure that? >> Well, they ask them, "Is your life more. meaningful?" And sometimes um I've got. one particular friend who's. part of his you know, uh. evidence that what he believes is true. is the feeling he got when he started. believing it. >> Yeah, well, >> But I but the data suggests that. >> that if it is true, a positive feeling. would reinforce that, of course, but it. doesn't prove it in the end. But then. your criteria for yourself of what you.
accept will be different from that. person. So, you have to proceed. on the basis like Thomas of old. He. wouldn't accept what the other guys. said. He said, "I need the evidence for. myself." And you need the evidence for. yourself. >> I guess you. >> Evidence of the kind that's going to. give you a settle of peace and. confidence in what you believe. I can. understand that perfectly. >> Then there are also thinking then I was. thinking that there's fiction movies. I've watched that made me feel really. good. >> Yeah, sure. >> Afterwards. And they made me feel like.
more motivated and connected to the. universe. >> course. >> Hey, what day? >> Uh just making myself a delicious. coffee. >> From the freezer? >> From the freezer? Have you not heard. about Cometeer? >> No. >> Oh my gosh. This is going to change your. life. I invested in this company called. Cometeer last year and then I'm one of. the sponsors of this podcast because. they've taken a pretty revolutionary. approach to making coffee. Every coffee. is precision brewed at 10 times the. strength and then they flash freeze it.
with liquid nitrogen to lock in the. flavor and freshness. And then it's. delivered to you on dry ice in these. recyclable aluminum capsules still. frozen, like a little ice cube. All you. have to do is pop the capsule out, add. some hot water, and then you stir it, and you are good. to go. You can also make delicious ice. coffee drinks as well. Just pour it in, stir it up. And for anyone that hasn't tried it, you.
can get $30 off your first order of. Cometeer coffee if you go to. cometeer.com/steven. I've done almost 700 interviews with. some of the most interesting people in. the world. And one of the things you. learn, which is unexpected, is that. vulnerability is the doorway to. connection. And after sitting here for. 2-3 hours with a guest, I feel a deep. sense of connection to them. And as they. leave, what I get them to do is to write. a question in the diary of a CEO. We've. taken all of the questions from The.
Diary of a CEO. We have put the question. here on this card with the name of the. person that wrote it. So, you can sit at. home, as I do with my fiance, and my. colleagues at work, and other people in. my life. Whenever we get a minute, we. play The Diary of a CEO conversation. cards. And it is incredible what. happens. These are great if you're in a. romantic relationship, and you want to. connect your partner more. These are. also great if you're in a team, and you. want to bond your team together. And I. have to say they're also great for. families that want to learn more about. each other, and that need a good excuse.
to spend some time in a digital world in. the analog environment connecting human. to human. It is remarkable what the. right question at the right time can do. Go to the diary.com, and you can get these conversation cards. right now. So, going back to this question I asked. about good people living a good life. It it it seems to be the case that the. the Bible suggests that if you don't. believe in God, even if you lived a good. life, you go to hell. And hell is. described as not a nice place.
So, I I was thinking about the most kind. person I know that's lived her life to. be unbelievable passed away. She didn't. believe. Does that mean she's in hell? >> Well, you can't answer that. Let me just say. something here that. what scripture reveals is a very. interesting thing. That the only people to whom Jesus. talked about hell were religious bigots. who were in danger of it. He didn't talk about it to ordinary.
folks who were struggling with. believing and trusting God and all the. rest. That's point number one. >> What what is what what are you what are. you implying there? >> Well, what I'm implying there is that. we paint hell as something. ogre-like, God-stuffing and demon-stuffing. bodies into hell when actually. I think Lewis got it right here, you. know, when he talks about this. That.
hell is absence of God. and it's chosen. If a person doesn't want God in their. life, and I've known people like that, and they choose it, God will give them. what they chose. Otherwise, God is going. to have to force his way into their. lives and they don't want him. And here. is the amazing thing, to my mind, about. Jesus and his attitude. He would go. places, he would heal people, he would. bring peace into their lives and all the.
rest of it, but when folk saw what he. did and said, "Go. Leave us alone." he. went. He didn't force his way into their. lives. And it seems to me that the one. example in the New Testament of a person. who. did not live a good life and neglected. the poor around him and ended. in that place, there is no evidence that. he wanted out of it. What he said was,
"Please send Abraham to my brothers that. they don't come to this place. There's. no indication that he wanted out of it. And I think this is a grim reality here, that when we use these words, we need to. be immensely careful. You can choose. not to have God, and God will honor that. choice, and that is hell. >> One of the things that I'm I grew up. believing because of the the Bible was.
that if you repented. >> Yes. >> which is, you know, to ask forgiveness, admit your sins, etc., acknowledge God, believe, then your sins would be. forgiven. >> Mhm. >> So, if someone was a serial killer for. their whole life and then repented at. the end of their life, would they be. forgiven and allowed into heaven? And I. guess this is kind of links to the. question I just asked, which is if. someone was a doctor for their whole. life. curing childhood cancer, but they didn't. believe, they would theoretically be going to. this place described as hell. >> Yeah. We can argue about cases like that.
all the time. Neither of us is God, and. the way God deals with these people. After all, next to Christ on the cross. were two thieves. Well, they were. terrorists, actually. They'd both. murdered, apparently. And one of them. railed against Jesus and shouted and all. this kind of thing. And the other. uh. simply said to him, "I deserve to be. here. Remember me when you come into. your kingdom." And Jesus turned to him. on the cross and said, "Today you will. be with me in paradise.".
>> So, he's forgiven a murderer? >> Yes. He in that sense, yes. And the. Apostle Paul, you know, was a murderer. There are deep mysteries here. It's just. amazing. I never forget looking through the door. of a Russian. uh security death row. I had never been. in a death row before, and this stink, it was just like a nightmare. And because I was the only one of the. Brits who could speak Russian, I went up. to the door. And a chap came over and looked at me,
gaunt and all this. And he was just. awaiting execution. And what he said to me was this. He. said, "I deserve to be here." He killed. 12 women or something. I can't remember. which. And then his face just burst into a. a what what I can only describe as a. ghastly smile. >> [snorts]. >> And he said, "I met Jesus here, and he. forgave me.". And you just. you go away with a very.
burdened heart, I think. And he said, "My colleague lying over. there is the same.". What do you make of it? I don't think. we're going to find out. >> I don't know. I feel like I'm wired to. try I try not to solve these. problems. These big questions. I have to like. figure them out, or they'll just sit. there causing increasingly more. confusion, which pops me right on that. agnostic fence. >> Yes, I would encourage you to. concentrate on the one that you think is. most important. One at a time. And I I don't know,
because. I've only met you. I think what you're doing. by. talking to people from different. backgrounds, and so on. I'd love to be. able to say, "Here's where you must. look." But each one of us is so complex, and what will answer the question for. you might not answer it for the person. sitting next to you. >> Mhm. >> But don't stop exploring, I would say. But I don't think you will.
>> No, I won't. That's for sure. Cuz I find. the the curious pursuit of truth in and. of itself a rewarding pursuit, irrespective of whether I ever find the. answers. >> That's the key. A speech that made a. deep impression on me was given by. Alexander Solzhenitsyn when he was. pushed out of the Soviet Union. Do not. compromise in the least with lies. Live. not by lies. I think our generation. needs to hear that because one of the.
great and tragic capacities of AI is the. spread of lies, deep fakes, all the rest. of it. I've been subject to it myself in the. last month. >> When you think about the impact that AI. is going to have on human purpose, we. talk a lot about job losses and. you know, white-collar workers, entry-level roles, and then really like. everything else. If If you have a long. enough time horizon, it's conceivable. that many of the roles we all do today, including maybe even as a podcaster. Um. I think Spotify announced this month. that you're going to be able to generate. your own podcasts with AI. Um.
What is the high-level sort of. philosophical point we need to. understand about meaning and how to live. a good life uh in a world where some of. us might lose our jobs and have to. contend with change in a way that we've. not experienced before? I think we just have to I mean, our. children, grandchildren, all the rest of. it. And one of my sons has beginning to. ask questions, "Dad, AI is looks as if. it's going to replace my job.". Well, he's tech-savvy and he will rise.
to it, I suspect. But all industrial. revolutions did this, but this is going. to do it on a scale never before seen. And the tragedy is. uh I was talking about this in South. Africa and they said, "It's all very. well to tell us to re-skill people, but. if you don't have the educational. infrastructure to do that, you'll just force a much bigger divide. between the rich and the poor.". >> Well, they're really worried about. >> I think the important thing, which is. why I wrote my books, is to inform and.
get people thinking and get them. talking. >> What is the conversation you want them. to be talking about? >> I think it's a very wide-ranging. conversation. You know, there are. existential. things for people. They're afraid. >> Should they be? >> Well, they should be afraid of some. things. I think the creeping advance of. totalitarianism is something that could. engulf us all.
if we're not very careful. It's. creeping, creeping, creeping, and is. being rolled out in parts of the world, particularly China, but not only. I read. a very interesting report by a Chinese. watcher. saying. "Beware, you in the West, because the. only difference between us and you is. you've got all the technology, but not. yet a central government imposing it.". Not yet. Beware. And I think we have to beware. [clears throat] because we are. sleepwalking into this.
Uh Sir Anthony Seldon, I don't know. whether you've come across him. >> [snorts]. >> He's a an educationist very highly. regarded by various governments has. written a book about AI as affecting. education. And, of course, it's having a. devastating effect, as you know. What is an essay? Everybody's using AI, and it's hard to. recognize whether it's AI or not now. So [snorts] that we're into a whole new.
world or coming rapidly into it. How do we know. [snorts and clears throat] what is true. and what isn't? A few weeks ago. I was contacted could a publisher. produce a transcript of a recent lecture. I'd given because they liked it so much. Never heard of it. I looked it up, discovered a website describing itself. as Lennox Logic. And it was a picture of me, but it was. deep fake all the way through, and. AI-generated.
material that I would never have said, all politicized and everything else. >> Is it conceivable that maybe, you know, so much of this technology has promised. that it would make us more human, and so. much of it failed, it made us more. isolated and lonely. >> Oh, yes. >> Is it conceivable that if a technology. comes along like AI, it will render us. um. useful for the things that humans are. uniquely positioned to do. As in, you know, being with each other. in the real world and relationships. And. is it conceivable that maybe we were.
never meant to sit in front of screens. tapping buttons and. >> Oh, I think that's absolutely true. What's already exercising many people's. minds. in that direction. >> And could that be a better life? >> Well, how would I judge that? >> I I guess one way Yeah, that's a good. point. Um You know, I was thinking about. this. I was thinking, is this like the. moment where we kind of regress back to. how we used to live? Our true maybe. human nature. Is that Is that what. happens here where I don't know, we. spend more time with each other in the.
real world and we. cuz that's what, you know, that's very. human and. my Maslovian needs of connection and. touch and. >> Yeah, yeah. Well, you can you. you can demonstrate [clears throat]. that. Look at these groups of parents. who have uh said to their kids, "Look, we're going away into the country for a. week. and we're taking your smartphones away.". And [clears throat] they grumble and. say, "No, no, no." And they come back. after the week having rediscovered. nature. They don't want to use their. smartphones very much. Totally.
transformed by touch and taste and. feeling. You see. >> [panting]. >> AI is a machine. It doesn't have any of our five senses. which are all connected with our. consciousness. It doesn't see. It doesn't hear. It doesn't taste. >> When you say it doesn't. When you say it doesn't it doesn't see. >> Oh, it can it can be programmed to. recognize patterns, but it has no. awareness of what the process of seeing. is. >> Does it need it? >> Well, that's not the point. What I'm.
saying is it's. uh distinctively human that we. understand what seeing is. We know what. seeing red is. >> Do we? >> The machine Yes, I think we do. I mean, we can philosophize all around it, but. it's a conscious experience. And consciousness from a scientific. perspective is called the hard problem. No one knows what it is. >> We don't understand it. >> Yes, we can't You can't replicate it. >> So, how do we know if. AI is conscious? If the output is the same, I mean, I can.
point an AI at this and say, "What is. it?" And the AI will say, "It's a mug.". And I can get a human talking here and. say, "What is that?" And they'll go, "A. mug.". Now, the output is the same. >> Yes, but the understanding is not there. >> And why does that part Why is that. critical? >> Well, because there's a huge difference. in being a machine and responding to a. program created by others. and being aware of what you're doing. consciously. That's a totally higher. level of being.
>> I agree, but what does that matter in. this context? >> Well, >> one Another way of asking these. questions actually visualized by what I. have in front of me here, because one of. the big big debates around AI is is it. creative? >> Yes, I know. >> So, here we have a picture done by. a human. >> Yes. >> Here, which is, you know, picture of a. family and a dog and a And then we have. another picture here, which is done by. AI. >> Yes. >> And we have another picture here, which. is done by a different AI.
>> Yes. >> Now, there's a debate that um AI can't. be creative. Now, can AI be creative? >> Well, if you call what's in front of you. as creative, then it can be. But, it now comes down to the very big. question of what you actually mean by. creative. >> [laughter]. >> Yeah. >> You see, it can create things. It can. put things together that. haven't been in that form before, but. it's not aware of doing it. It doesn't.
know that those are children. Because it doesn't know. >> But, if I ask it, "What is that, it. would say a child. >> Yes, but it doesn't know. Like we know. >> And does And this it goes back to the. same question, which is does. which is like what the process. Why does the process matter if the. output is identical? >> Well, let me just say that that view is. exactly the view that Alan Turing took.
at the beginning. And if you look at. what's often referred to as the AI. Bible, uh Peter Norvig and his. colleagues, he said, "Look, we are not trying. to create a conscious machine. We. wouldn't even know what that meant. >> Yeah. >> We are happy. with the imitation game. And that's good enough for us. We're not. trying to do it. But you see, the conscious side involves all our. appreciation of life and nature and.
beauty and so on that we can see some. meaning in, but also there's another. thing. There's a consciousness. of other people. And there's God consciousness. I don't. think AI anywhere near that. Machines, there are certain things they cannot do. even potentially that the human mind can. do. So there's no way a machine is ever. going to be able to simulate a human. mind completely. But that's difficult. That's difficult mathematics and all the.
rest of it and it's highly. controversial. >> Why is it an important conversation to. have that. it is conscious or not conscious when. the output is is the same? >> Yes, I I can see the question. But if. you want to live in a reductive universe. which ends up being meaningless, well, then you can go that way. There's not. nothing to stop you. But it seems to me. there are enough indicators. within nature, within science, within. our human experience. that tell us there's a bigger world.
And this is the right and left brain. stuff. We're back to McGilchrist again. He would he would his stuff and AI is. very strong. He thinks it's really. dangerous because it's ruining. all this side of the brain and the. richness. of human experience and it's in danger. of destroying it. He actually invites people to come and. fight with him. >> So in such a world, what is it that. makes humans um what what is it that.
makes us special? Is it that those human things we talked. about relational. >> Oh, I think so. Yes, absolutely. And the. fact that you and I can have a. conversation like this. >> You could have this conversation with. AI? >> Not the same way. AI is pretty thin. still. You can have a conversation of. sorts, but remember who's responsible. for its capacity? Humans. It's something. made in the image of humans and that's a. dangerous thing. I'd prefer. I'd prefer to remain with something made.
in the image of God. >> It's interesting cuz we almost we're. we're getting to a point where there's. going to probably be some like ethical. questions around robotics. But I mean. around robotics. >> Oh, everywhere. >> You know in the same way that many of us. feel quite empathetic towards like. trees. >> Yes, yes. >> And we feel empathetic towards animals. Now trees haven't got a brain, but just. cutting down a tree needlessly I think. would annoy a lot of people because it's. >> It would annoy me. >> Yeah, it would annoy me, too. And I. think there's almost going to get to a. point where like.
you know, people are going to start asking similar. questions around. >> robots. >> Which is. it's an interesting question. >> It is. It is. >> Let me ask you a final question then, which is what is the the most important. thing we haven't talked about that we. should have talked about as it relates. to. all of the work in these tangential. subjects? >> Oh, I can't answer that. That. >> [laughter]. >> Perhaps the most important thing is.
finding the trigger that will help you. to take a step forward into. into faith, into the Christian faith. And. I would just encourage you to keep. asking your questions in the open way. you've done, and I have regarded it an. honor to. have this discussion, and I hope very. much it won't be the last one. But age. may prevent that. But thank you very. much. >> We have a closing tradition where the.
last guest leaves a question for the. next, not knowing who they're leaving it. for. And the question that's left for you. in a world with so many challenges, what. can we do to restore hope and trigger. engagement? >> Give people a real basis for hope that. transcends this world. And the only place I know where to find. that.
is in Christ and in Christianity. >> John, thank you. One of the One of the. most compelling. arguments for uh. God that you've presented and your way. of seeing the world and being. is not actually necessarily anything. you've written in your books or not not. necessarily anything you've said. It is. It is actually. you. >> [laughter]. >> And uh you you you have a certain peace. and contentment.
that I rarely see in people that I. interview, but I often see and I've. almost always seen. in the Christians that I've interviewed. And this is a interesting phenomenon for. me. I interviewed Wesley Huff recently. Do you know Wesley Huff? >> Yes. Yeah. >> He was the same as you. >> Canadian. And Wesley's a bright cookie. >> Yeah, he was very much He gave me the. the feeling as you. Just like feels like. a really happy person. Very sort of. content, rounded, well. >> There are many of us. >> Yeah. But, it seems to be a trend that, you know, a lot of the Christian. apologists that I've interviewed have. that.
anchoring that. >> Yeah. >> so many of us are looking for. >> There's a real sense of that. You know, I sit in front of many people, and of. course they often ask me questions I. don't even understand, but. in life, that peace is very important to. me. And also, what we started with. When I look at you, I see someone who's of infinite value. made in the image of God. And so, what I.
say to you, or think about you, is. hugely important to me. And I wish you well. >> Thank you. Um I highly recommend I mean, you've. written so many books. I I don't have. all of them here, but I have a long list. of them. But, I highly recommend. everybody goes and checks out your. autobiography, which is your most recent. works. >> Yep. >> Um it's called John Lennox. I'm going to. link it below. It's a spiritual and. intellectual autobiography that I think. is highly fascinating to read because of. how diverse your thinking and skill sets.
are. But, also, this wonderful I mean, you wrote If people are interested in. the subject of AI, then I highly. >> Then they should read 2084. >> I'll link 2084 below as well. That's. 2084, Artificial Intelligence and the. Future of Humanity. Um and I highly. recommend everybody goes and reads both. books because they you are a truly. um fascinating person with a very unique. skill stack and experience stack and. perspective. Fascinating. Thank you so much, John. >> Oh, thank you. >> YouTube have this new crazy algorithm. where they know exactly what video you.
would like to watch next based on AI and. all of your viewing behavior. And the. algorithm says that this video is the. perfect video for you. It's different. for everybody looking right now. Check. this video out, I bet you you might love. it.
