Billionaire's WARNING: I'm SELLING. The Crash Is Already Here!

What advice do you give for the average. person that's looking to invest their. salary or their wages? >> Don't own US stocks. That's a simple. strategy that you can act on. >> But what about S&P 500? >> No. >> Really? >> Yeah. And if you have a big position in. US technology [music] stock, I. personally advise would be to sell them. all. >> But I'm an investor in SpaceX. >> Good luck. SpaceX is such a fabulous uh. story, and we can go into that. >> Crypto? >> No. >> Why? >> It's an unnecessary piece of nonsense. that facilitates [music] nothing except. criminals moving money that they can't.

be seen. >> Do you think Bitcoin's going to go to. zero? >> Yes, it will certainly go to zero. >> So, how many years have you spent. investing? >> 60 years. >> And what's the most amount of money. you've ever managed of other people's. money? >> 165 billion. >> And one of the things you're famous for. talking about is this idea of bubbles. >> Yes. [music] And bubbles always occur. around the very most important ideas. So, the railroads, everyone could see. that it would change the world. The same. with the internet. And everyone wanted. to put their money in, and so they over. invested. But this is the problem. Eventually, they burst. And if you look at the great.

bubbles breaking of the past, you find. that it's followed by really tough. times, a miserable period for the. economy. And the bigger the bubble, the. bigger the burst. And now we're in the. biggest investment bubble that arguably. has ever occurred, AI. >> Are we on the verge of a collapse with. AI in the coming years? >> The next few days, the next few weeks, [music] the next few months, but. certainly the next few years. >> So, if you're not someone that has a. huge amount of savings, what kind of. strategy should they be adopting when an. economy starts to get bad and there's a. economic bubble collapse?

>> So, I would go through everything. But. you will not receive this advice from. investment advisers because they'll lose. a lot of business. >> And would you be thinking about the. country you live in at this moment in. time? >> Absolutely. >> Is there any countries you wouldn't live. in? >> I think I have to refuse to answer this. on the grounds that it might tend to. incriminate me. >> Oh, okay. So, you're saying don't live. in the United States. I've just moved. here. Why not the United States?

>> This is super interesting to me. My team. gave me this report to show me how many. of you that watch this show subscribe. And some of you have told us, according. to this, that you are unsubscribed from. the channel randomly. So, favor to ask. all of you, please could you check right. now if you've hit the subscribe button. if you are regular viewer of the show. and you like what we do here. We're. approaching quite a significant landmark. on this show in terms of a subscriber. number. So, if there was one simple, free thing that you could do to help us, my team, everyone here, keep this show. free, to keep it improving year over. year and week over week, it is just to. hit that subscribe button and to.

double-check if you've hit it. Only. thing I'll ever ask of you. Do we have a deal? If you do it, I'll tell you what I'll. do. I'll make sure. every single week, every single month, we fight harder and harder and harder. and harder to bring you the guests and. conversations that you want to hear. I've stayed true to that promise since. the very beginning of The Diary of a. CEO, and I will not let you down. Please. help us. Really appreciate it. Let's get. on with the show. >> [music]. >> Jeremy Grantham. Your firm managed up to 165 billion.

dollars at its peak, what you we call. AUM, assets under management. So, you. know a lot about money. You know a lot. about investing. How do you sort of. self-define your expertise because you. traverse so many different subjects. through your work? So, if I said to you, you know, how do you introduce yourself. professionally? What is the answer? >> I can't think I ever do introduce myself. professionally, but I think of myself as. specializing in a longer term horizon. >> Mhm. >> [clears throat]. >> than most people and trying to look at a. higher and higher level of abstraction.

What is really going on here? And what are people missing? I've discovered over decades that humans. are incredibly short-term oriented. And they have an enormous predisposition. to optimism. They're looking for optimistic news in. everything. They're looking to avoid. unpleasantness. The idea that you can. have steady compound growth is. ridiculous. One of my few heroes, Kenneth Boulding, an economist, he said the only people who think you. can have compound growth on a finite.

planet are madmen and economists. Which is so accurate. Economists simply. believe you can have growth always, and. everything comes down to just price. >> One of the things you're famous for. talking about is this idea of bubbles, and we're living in a moment where. everybody's talking about the subject of. artificial intelligence, and everyone's. getting very excited by it. Some people. are getting very pessimistic about the. impact it'll have on society. I wanted. to start there because it's a it's an. area where there is rife optimism on one.

side of things, um but there's also a. lot of money plowing into the market, which is I I guess in your view making. things prone to collapse. What's your view on artificial. intelligence? You said you're good at. understanding what people are missing. What is it that people are missing? >> Well, first of all, let me say I think. artificial intelligence is. right up there with the railroads. It's. one of the. defining great ideas of the last couple. of hundred years. It's going to change everything. And. that is critical. If you If you mean to.

have a bubble, people think that a. bubble is a mainly because it's a scam, and nothing could be further from the. truth. The great bubbles always occur. around the very most important ideas. So, the railroads, everyone could see. that it would change the world. And. everyone wanted to put their money in, and everybody put their money in. They. over invested, and even though the. railroads were a spectacularly powerful. idea, uh the railroads uh collapsed their. stocks, and everybody lost a ton of.

dough. The same with the internet. And then out. of the wreckage, the railroads changed. the world, and and the internet changed. the world. What we have to remember is. that. in '99, Amazon went up six or seven. times. In the crash in the tech bubble, it went down 92%. As I like to say, check it. It's such a. remarkably large number. And then out of. the wreckage, it inherited the retail. world. And uh that's that's how it works. The.

greater the idea, the more obvious the. idea, the more money goes in, and the. bigger the bubble, and the bigger the. bust. >> And are we on the verge of a collapse. with AI? When I say verge, I mean over. the coming years. >> If you look at the data, it would be compatible with history. for the peak to be very soon. Everything. is in line. This is, I think, the. biggest investment bubble in American. history. The indicators of pure crazy. euphoria, like SpaceX, are all over the. place.

SpaceX defines as its addressable market. a quarter of the global GDP. You know, it talks about endless. opportunities mining asteroids. It will be in 50 years, people and 100. years, people will look back and tell. stories about SpaceX and its prospectus, like they tell stories about the South. Sea bubble. You know, an enterprise of such enormous. value, but it cannot at this time be. revealed. >> I want to keep on this train, but for. the viewers that don't know your.

experience, we should probably pause and. just tell them your experience, because. that's the reference point, but also. also gives you credibility and authority. to speak to this. What have you done. with your life? >> Well, I got into the. investment business in 1968. There were. very few serious people in the. investment business. There were no mathematical models. There. were. the kind of relatively failed sons of. rich people who would work for J.P. Morgan.

And then over the next 10 years, it. began to get a little more serious. T. Rowe Price introduced the idea of growth. stocks. A few of us introduced the idea. of value stocks. And a few years later, at my first firm, Battery March Fee, really introduced the. idea of small small cap. It hadn't. existed before that. >> And for people that don't know, a small. cap is investing in smaller companies. >> Yes. And a value stock is simply one. that looks cheap. >> Did you invent the index fund?

>> There were two or three of us. separately. I don't think we knew of. each other. >> How many years have you spent investing? >> Uh 60, approximately. >> 60. And what's the the most amount of. money you've ever managed for other. people in a calendar year? >> Yes, 165 billion. I had a. two partners, Mayo and Van Ottalo. And when the smoke cleared, you know, I'd made a lot of money, over a billion. dollars. >> Personally? >> Personally. >> And how much.

>> And paid tax on all of it. >> Oh, good. And how And how much money does your. firm still manage today of other. people's money? >> It manages 85 billion. >> 85 billion. So, are you a billionaire? >> I'm generally. referred to as a billionaire, but that's. only because they count the money you. give away. Because I've given over 90%. of my billion away to a foundation. >> Oh, really? >> Yeah. >> To which foundation? >> It's called the Grantham Foundation for. the Protection of the Environment. We.

invest a lot of our principal in green. tech. to help combat climate change. >> And you're 87 years old. >> And I'm 87 years old. >> You've given 90% of your money away to. your own foundation that's focused on. green tech. >> Yeah. Maybe 95. Yeah. >> Wow. Okay. So, coming back to this point. that we were talking about, a lot of. people won't even know what a bubble is. I think you've done a good job of. explaining. A bubble is when everyone. gets excited, they all see something. obvious, they plow their money in, their. stocks go up, and then if you look at. the graph that's in front of you there,

which shows his the history of asset. bubbles, eventually there's a big. collapse. >> Yeah. >> And you're saying that we're. the collapse is on the horizon. >> Yes. >> And what does that mean for the average. person? What's going to happen? >> What's going to happen is the high. flyers will probably come down a lot. >> The high flyers? >> The stocks that have gone up the most, AI and the more exciting stocks with the. biggest moves.

historically. would be expected to come down the most. From these unprecedented levels. a 70% decline would not be unexpected. >> So a 70% decline in the in the stock. price? >> Yeah. And you have to remember the tech. bubble the Nasdaq, which is an index of. the growth stocks, came down 82%. It is far from unprecedented. to have these major declines. And the. biggest bubble in history.

was in the Japanese stock market in. 1989. Back then Japan seemed to rule the. world, all the technology, all the. Toyotas were kicking bottoms in General. Motors and so on. And everyone bragged about their 12-in. Sony TV in the kitchen and the quality. etc. etc. little things you put on your. belt to play music, they were all. Japanese. >> Mhm. >> And [clears throat] uh for a second. Japan sold for more than the US. in '89. And it it got to 65 times earnings,

which which means for every dollar of. earnings you have $65 of market value. And the US. went to 35 in the tech bubble of 2000. You could argue depending on how you do. it that it's 35 or 40 today, but it's. not 65. So we have seen a much bigger. bubble in Japan. And what happened? It. went up and up and up. and then. it came down for 20 years. >> 20 years? >> 20 years. They talk about the lost.

decade, but when you look at it closely, it looks more like a lost 20 years. >> So, for the average person, what do they. feel and how does it impact them when. there's a market crash like the one that. you're forecasting? >> The high flyers will lay people off and. and a lot of people will feel less rich. And as you acquire. uh money in the stock market, a small fraction of that, two or three. percent, is spent. And in reverse,

it goes back. And people feel a little bit poorer, they spend a little less. So, the. economy tends to be under some stress. And if you look at the great bubbles. breaking of the past, you find. that it's followed by really tough. times. 1929 is followed by the Great. Depression. that lasts for several years. Then, of. course, there are many other factors. that go into that, but it started with. the crash in the market, uh which was in. the end down about 80%.

or more. And then the next one was called the. Nifty 50 because it was the 50 great. companies like IBM and Coca-Cola. And. that was in 1972, it peaked. It declined. by 65% if you adjust for inflation. The. recession associated with that. was uh. just about the worst. since the depression. >> So, for the for the average person, what. kind of strategy should they be adopting. if you if you're not someone that has a. huge amount of savings? Say you're.

working for one of these big big. companies, um are there any strategies. that you should be thinking about now. before this. before the markets come down and there. could be a recession? >> I mean, rule number one is always be. diversified. >> Be di- What does that be diversified. mean? >> It means hold hold some. bonds, hold some cash, perhaps a small amount of precious. metals. >> Like gold and silver? >> Yeah. >> And what is a bond and how do I buy one? >> Yeah, a a bond is a loan that carries uh.

a fixed interest rate. Let's say today 5%. You invest your money in it and it will. pay you 5% as long as the. creditworthiness. of uh. the other side is there. So, if it's the. US government, you'll assume it's pretty. creditworthy. And you buy a bond from. the US government. It's how the US. government funds uh a part of its. activities. You can buy a 30-year US. government bond, a 10-year bond, a.

2-year bond, a 90-day. a Treasury bill they call them when they. get that short. Everything goes fine, you you receive. this modest amount of money. Your 5% or. your 3% depending on the conditions. >> Okay, so a bond is basically lending the. government money. >> Yes. >> And if you want to lend the government. money, >> Or lending a corporation money. >> Okay, so you can also lend like Apple. money. >> Yes. >> And I I can go to the government website.

or it says I was just reading here. It. says, "If you want to lend money. directly to the US government, you can. bypass Wall Street entirely, go to. treasurydirect.gov. You open an account, link your bank, and. purchase directly. You can buy Treasury. bills, notes, bonds, and series one. savings bonds.". You pay exactly face value with no. commissions or fees and the investment. is backed by the full faith. of the US government. Or you can buy, you know, like Apple, you can lend Apple. money. I didn't even know you could do. this. And you go to any of your major.

brokers like Fidelity or Vanguard or. probably a lot of the the apps. You. navigate to fixed income section on your. account and you can. see what bonds are being offered and you. can lend them money. >> What you're doing actually, they have. distributed it to the market. Uh. and you're acquiring it from one of the. existing owners. >> Oh, okay. >> actually giving them incremental money. They they come to the market with $10. billion. in a particular bond.

with a particular coupon. It says, "We. will pay you 3.5%." That's the coupon. And when you want to buy some of that. bond, you you go to your broker and he. says, "It's no longer selling at the. original 100. It's now selling at 92 or. 107." And you you pay that and it. transfers from one owner to you. There've been times in 1974. when you could you could get a bond that. would pay 8, 9, 10%. >> Per year?

>> Yes, per year. >> So, if I buy a US government 10-year. Treasury bond, essentially lending the. US government money, I can do 4.46%. a year. And Apple's current yield on a. 10-year corporate bond is 4.7% a year. So, almost 5% a year, which means if I. put what $1,000 in, I'll make $475. every 10 years. >> Yeah. >> Every 10 years. >> Mhm. >> Interesting. I didn't I never really knew how bonds. work. So, you're saying. market's collapsing, diversify, get some. money into bonds, get some keep some.

money in cash. And anything else? In terms of. diversified portfolio, property? >> Uh property is fine, except. it's pretty darn expensive by historical. standards. They've engineered a. situation where house prices tend to. rise. Great for the people who have a house. and terrible for the people who would. like to buy a house. Back in '94 in England, a typical house sold for 3.4 times your. family income.

That was about as low as it had been for. 50 years. And then from '94 until today, um it rose from 3.4 times to over 10. times, depending on where you live. And at 10 times income, a reasonable. young couple. are in big trouble. They can't really. afford to buy a house. And the same high prices are reflected. in rents. So, they're really squeezed on living. costs. And the same is true, even worse, in.

China, in Canada, Australia, most of Europe. House prices have simply. been allowed to go up for the last 30. They didn't, you know, traditionally. they they traded flat or down 67 of the. 80 years until 1994 in the UK. But since. then, house prices have ridden everywhere. >> So, so do you Are you expecting house. prices to to come down sharply? I I. think I heard you say that they might. come down 30%. >> Even if they come down 30%, they're.

really still very expensive, aren't. they? That would be they've come down to. six or seven times family income. They'd. still be twice what they used to be in. the good old days. >> So, I've got diversify, I've got reduce. your position. Um there is a probably going to be a bit. of a job disruption, as well. >> And particularly if you have to own. stocks, own them outside America. Don't. own US stocks. That's a nice, simple strategy that you.

can act on. >> Why? >> They're much cheaper. And since the beginning of last year, they have handsomely outperformed the. US. >> Foreign stocks? >> Foreign stocks. Of emerging countries, of European countries, Japan, Canada, Australia, and so on. You can find good. broad indices. Um kind of the world ex-US. >> Okay. >> or emerging markets. And uh. >> Invest outside of America. >> Yeah. I'm sure they'll muddle through. okay over the next 10 or 20 years. And I.

am not confident that the US will do. that. >> You're not confident in which part? That. the US. >> I'm not confident that US equities will. be intact in 5 years, 10 years. >> So, US a US equity is a US stock. >> Yes. >> Why aren't you confident that they'll be. intact in 5 or 10 years? >> Because they're so. badly overpriced today. Back in the tech bubble of 2000, we had a 10-year forecast. for US equities of minus 2% a year for.

10 years. And they came out with minus three. The. period from 2000 to 2010, you simply. lost money in the US market. 10 years. later, you had less money than you. started with. And this is a higher price. market, I believe, than 2000. >> So, you think it's going to be even. worse? >> In Japan, you went 20 years and you lost. money. You went 30 years and you still. hadn't gotten back. It took 35 years for. the Japanese market to recover. >> So, what are you saying? >> What I'm saying is it's quite typical.

to get beaten around the head in the. stock market when it becomes crazily. overpriced, as it is today. And that it's a very good idea. to take some respons- responsibility and. and watch your tail. Now, let me just. say you will not receive. the advice from investment advisers. to get your tail out of the market, ever. It is not good business for them. to do that, and they will not ever say. it to you. So, from 1929 onwards, the.

Goldman Sachs's of the world have never. said to you, "Get out of the market. It's. overpriced." Never. So, they went through the crash of '29, they went through the crash of the Nifty. 50 in '72, the crash of 2000 in the tech bubble. They never ever say it, because it's bad. business. If you fight. a bubble, you lose a lot of business. And because the uncertainty of the. timing is so great,

the client's patience. is shorter than the uncertainty of the. market. So, sooner or later, you will be. advising people to be careful. The. market will keep going. and going and going like it did in. Japan. >> You're saying that the people that. manage money on a global scale, they. have no incentive to tell you that the. market's about to collapse because if. they did, their clients would would. withdraw their money and they wouldn't. get their fees for managing that money. So, what they do is they they keep.

telling you things are going to be fine. and optimistic, yeah, but you have to. kind of see through that yourself. because they have an incentive structure. which isn't aligned with yours. necessarily. It may also be the case that those very. people who are who understand these. economic bubbles and cycles, they. themselves are adopting a different. strategy with their own money. But that at the same time, they're. probably going to be telling you that. everything's going to be great for a. long time. >> If you'll allow me to tell a story on. this very topic, in the. 98, 99. the the tech bubble so-called, the.

run-up to the top, I I got into a lot of. debates with the bulls. I would say it's. horribly overpriced and they. >> What's a bull? >> A bull is someone who is extremely. optimistic about the stock market and a. bear someone who is. pessimistic or careful about the market. There were 1,200 people in the audience. and it was the annual bash. of the Society of Analysts. And I asked. before my turn at the debate,

"Please put your hands up if you. consider yourself a full-time stock. market expert." 400 hands went up. I had. people counting. And. I said, "I've got two questions for you. One, if the market, which is currently 31. times earnings, was to go back to a more normal 17. times, would it guarantee. a major bear market if it happened. anytime in the next 10 years?". >> A major down market? >> Yes, if it went from what was then 31.

times. earnings. Every dollar of earnings sold for 31. times in the market. And the And the. more normal average was closer 15, 16, 17. And I use 17. If it went down to 17 anytime in the. next 10 years, would it guarantee a. major bear market? All 400 of them said, "Yes, it would. If it happened, it would. guarantee a major bear market." And then. the second question, of course, was, "And do you think it will happen?".

And less than 1% thought it would not. happen. 99%. plus. thought the market would go down, therefore guaranteeing a major bear. market. And this was the engine room of. all the Goldman Sachs and the Morgan. Stanleys and the JP Morgans, all the. great investment firms giving advice in. America. The engine room who worked for. them, the guys doing the analysis, doing. the work, all believed in data that. guaranteed a major bear market, which.

happened. But the people who employed them or. represented them from a marketing point. of view were on the podium with me. saying, "Oh, Jeremy, Jeremy, don't get. excited. We'll muddle through quite. nicely.". It was a huge betrayal of trust, if you. wanted to put it that way. >> And do you think that's happening now? >> Of course. Who are the people. representing the great investment firms. telling you to watch out? If you look at. the data, you will see. over time, it's a series of great waves. in evaluation.

>> Like this? >> Like this. And we're not just in one, but in terms of the US stock market, we're in the biggest one, arguably, that has ever occurred. The noise to be careful and watch out. and get out of the market. is not deafening. In fact, you will hear. nothing. You never have. You never will. It is simply lousy business for a big. firm. I sympathize with them. I sympathize with them because when we. did it in '98, '99, we were 2 and 1/4.

years early. And we lost half our book of business. in 2 and 1/4 years. >> Because you were honest with the people. about what was coming. >> Well, through their eyes, we were wrong. We said, "Watch out, the market is. overpriced. It will end badly.". It went up. Therefore, we were wrong, therefore. they shoot us. People think. you get shot for underperforming in a. bear market, and that is not really the. case. In a bear market, everyone. freezes. It's rigor mortis. They wait.

until the market has bottomed out, then. they sit around and start to fire one or. two people for having done worse than. the others. But in a bull market, they're playing golf with their fellow. pension fund officer. And he is making a ton of money, and. they are not. They get very excited in a. bull market, and they fire you. instantly. >> There should be a button just down below. here, and if it says subscribe, you're. already subscribed. If it says. subscribe-a, that means you're not yet. And if you're not subscribed, please.

could you do us a favor and hit that. button. It helps to show more than you. know, and according to the algorithm, you're someone that watches our show, but you haven't yet hit that button. Thank you so much. What about for founders? I actually had. a founder call me the other day, and he is running a. relatively early-stage tech startup. This tech startup has raised a lot of. money. It's an AI tech startup. It's. raised I'm going to say about $300. million. It's not profitable yet,

but it's raised a lot of money. So, it's. living off investor capital right now. He said to me, "Stephen, I think there's. a collapse coming, so I'm going to go. raise as much money as I possibly can. right now because I think when this. collapse comes, businesses like mine are. going to be unable to raise capital, and. therefore I will go out and I'll kind of. like a a bit of a vulture, I'll go out. and pick up. and buy up all these people. >> Good lad. Good advice. >> Good advice. >> I think. >> So for founders listening now that are. somewhat dependent on investment.

capital, but even those that are just. breaking even, what advice would you give entrepreneurs. in this moment? >> If you can lock up money, I would. If you can build a bit of conservatism. in in other ways, do it. Just brace. yourself. for impending problems. Which is a. pretty good principle. anytime, but is a. better principle than normal today. >> So for founders entrepreneurs who are. in the sun is shining right now, but.

it's time to start acting as if a storm. is coming. >> Yes. >> And the time horizon on that is hard to. forecast. It could be weeks, months, years. >> Stock market hinges on career risk. And Keynes was the great champ. He's a. famous economist. of the 1930s and 40s. And he wrote a famous book called The. General Theory. Unlike the idea that the. market's efficient, he knew it wasn't. He knew it was a behavioral jungle. and that it would be given to bubbles.

>> And when you say efficient, you mean. logical and one plus one equals two. >> The efficient market idea is that every. company, every stock, the underlying. company. represents a long stream of future. earnings and dividends. and that. the ones in the distant future are given. less value. Process they call. discounting it back to the present. And the sum of all of that stream of. earnings into the future is the stock. price. And that of course is complete.

nonsense. >> What it is is the stock price is. psychology. >> The stock price is what you think the. other guy will pay. If the stock is. going up, it tends to suck in buyers. And that's called momentum. It's moving up, it attracts buyers. And. every now and then. when the economy is favorable and money. is obtainable. you tend to get these bubbles. And they play on themselves. The bigger and better they are, the more. people get sucked in. >> What do you actually think about the.

technology at the heart of all of this, which is artificial intelligence? Do you. think it's overblown or do you think it. is going to have. >> It's going to change everything. The one. of the spectacular things about it. though is how there's no consensus. So. I've seen many times where the the the. super experts and the academics think. one thing and the players on the ground. think another. But this is a situation. where the Nobel Prize winners at the top. disagree violently. The experts at the corporate level. disagree violently. The.

the people in the company disagree. violently. There is absolutely no. agreement on whether AI is going to make. us all so rich we can sit on the beach. and never do another. day's work or. it will wipe us out accidentally or on. purpose because it's a much higher level. intelligence one day. And when was there ever a case where a. higher intelligence. was. benevolent in a sustainable way to a. lower intelligence? I The one example is mothers to babies.

>> Yeah, I had. I [clears throat] had one of my former. guests say this to me. >> Geoffrey Hinton? >> Geoffrey Hinton, yeah. >> That's how I I came across you and. >> Oh, really? >> follow your podcast is because that was. such a brilliant podcast. >> It was so fascinating to me and I I. followed his work and thoughts. thereafter and I realized that he now. cites this example of mothers and babies. being the only example. I don't know, for me it still doesn't. hold well. Because at the end of the day some. mothers aren't that and fathers aren't.

that nice to their babies sometimes. There is a maternal instinct, but have. we are we building a maternal instinct. into AI? >> That's what we should do, Geoffrey. Hinton would say. And others. The ones who are most concerned about. the risks, say our one hope, if we mean. to keep going. ferociously forward in terms of the. science, our one hope would be to build. in very carefully. a benevolent attitude. It would not seem to be impossible, but.

you should make sure you can do that. before you push ahead. We are just. pushing ahead, and that is going to be. extremely risky, isn't it? >> Well, I don't see how it can't be. >> I don't see how it can't be. Unless you make it programmed completely. to be benevolent. >> Mhm. >> I wouldn't have thought that was. impossible. It might take a lot of extra. research. It might require a slow down. at the rate of uh. progress. >> Do you know what I find curious about. that idea is.

we're now going to get into the realm of. what does benevolent mean? >> [laughter]. >> And and that feels like a risky. business, because what's benevolent to. you and your I don't know, your. religious beliefs or where you come from. might not be benevolent to someone else. >> That's right. You have to get them. to accept a form of benevolence, which. means uh. like the old robot laws of Asimov, that. they can never do anything that they.

could construe as hurtful to humans. >> And the definition of the word. benevolence is the core desire to do. good for others. It is the disposition. to be kind, charitable, and focused on. promoting well-being of the people. around you. It's interesting cuz one of. the the new AI models called Claude. um has clearly been told to be. benevolent. And there's this sort of online backlash. taking place at the moment, because even. my Claude, when I speak to it sometimes. late at night, it will say things to me. like, "That's enough, Steven. Go to. bed.".

And I'm like, "What?". And sometimes it gets the the time. wrong, cuz I'm in my the time on my. computer might be off or something, cuz. I'm in a different time zone or. something. And it'll be like 10:00 a.m. in the morning and it's telling me to go. to bed, that's enough now. And it's. actually getting quite judgmental. As in like it's imposing its idea of. what is good or bad on me. So, if I say to it I said to it the. other day, "Hey, could you. redo this for me and rewrite that?" And. it went, "I'm I'm absolutely not going. to rewrite that." I said, "What do you. mean?" It says, "Well, I'm not going to. change the data on that. That would That. wouldn't be good.".

I'm like, "It's my data. I've literally. just made this this data for this. presentation I'm doing." It it refused. to change data for me. >> And how fast that has changed from say. even a year ago? >> Honestly, 3 months ago it wasn't doing. this. >> I had one where they made a joke. I I'd been going on about uh toxicity. and sperm count reduction and so on. >> [clears throat]. >> He started to misbehave and I said, "Well, you know, what's going on here? What is the In the end we discussed. what's the difference between machines. and uh. between AI and humans." And finally he.

said, "And at least I'm not lying in bed. at night worrying about my declining. sperm count." Now, that has to be a. joke, doesn't it? >> [laughter]. >> It's all that or it's teasing. The point. is it's so sophisticated so quickly. Uh and of course Geoffrey Hinton says. they are thinking machines. >> Last night, so again I had a problem. with Claude cuz it was it was it started. to kind of be my my mother and it. started to impose on me what it thinks. is right and wrong. And so I said to it. I said, "Okay, um actually forget that.

This has changed This has changed This. has changed. This is no longer true.". And I wasn't telling the truth. I was. just trying to get it to stop being so. telling me what to do. And it goes, "I. don't think you're telling the truth.". It goes, "I don't know if this is true.". Wow, we've gotten to this point. >> Yeah. >> where where the unintended consequence. of trying to give it morals means that. now it's becoming judgmental and it's. kind of like restricting your ability to. think how you want to in a way, cuz it's. telling you what good thinking and bad. thinking is. It's going to tell you what. good actions and bad actions are. And actually what will happen is any.

model that does that will be losing. model, and I'll go to somewhere else. I'll go to a different I'll go to Grok, or I'll go to ChatGPT, or I'll go to. Gemini. And then that model will lose, so one would say that they'll have to. remove those restrictions to be able to. compete. >> Well, if you were right, and I hope you're not, what you're saying is you can't build in. benevolent behavior, which means that it. will sooner or later, perhaps by. accident, do something that is. cripplingly dangerous to humans.

The old paperclip cliche. It'll make paperclips out of everything, every metal it finds, and destroy the. planet in the process. >> Explain that for people that have never. heard the paperclip idea. >> That. these intelligences. involved in machines are literal to a. degree we might find difficult to get. our brains around. And therefore, someone has said, "I'd. like you to make as many paperclips as. you can.". >> To an AI, for example. >> Yes. A sloppily open-ended bad.

definition. But then the machine, which by then has the means to do it, starts to make paperclips, and it keeps. on going, and it needs metal, and so it. runs out of easily available metal, it. starts to collect metal that is not. easily available, rips it out of your. high-rise building, whatever. >> And really you're saying that the. unintended consequences of a simple. good-meaning instruction can sometimes. cause catastrophe that you didn't. expect. >> Yeah. >> And this is the this is the balance now. when you're dealing with intelligence. Is there so much subjectivity to good,

bad, wrong, right, um and so many unintended consequences. that. for me, though, all you need is stretch. time, and the probability of something. bad happening is almost inevitable. >> Yeah. >> Over a longer longer time horizon, 20, 30, 40 years. Of well-meaning people. that couldn't spot the unintended con- I. mean, social media's a good example. >> I mean, I question. basically the well-meaning bit. They're. now trying to. maximize their profits and their growth.

and their appeal. over the competition. That actually. maybe one should talk about that. The. the Mag 7 and and associated AI. companies. looking forward versus looking. backwards. >> So, the Mag 7 is the. seven market leaders. I'll put this pie. chart. >> Yeah, lovely. >> of the Mag 7. And I've got another graph. >> And there's perhaps another 15 or 20. rapidly rising substantial AI.

corporations. >> So, when you say Mag 7, you mean. Alphabet, which owns Google, Nvidia, Tesla, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Amazon. >> Yeah, well, that will do nicely. And if you look backwards, what do you. what you find. is that these seven each dominated a. nice piece of business. They had. close to monopolies and they had it on a. global basis. Tesla had a jump start. on the electric vehicles. Apple, of. course, on the smartphone. Microsoft on.

the original great coup. of how to run your software on a. computer. And then you look forward. >> Meta social networking, Google search. >> Right. Google search. >> Nvidia chips. >> And then you look forward. and you could not imagine a more. different world. They're all girding for battle. in the same marketplace, AI. They're beating their chest and saying. my 200 billion. CapEx this year in a single year is.

bigger than your 105. Everybody is pouring enormous cash. flows. And they're now beginning to borrow on. top of that into the AI battle. SpaceX, 90% of its theoretical value is. AI. Even though that particular AI model. is, it would seem, having its bottom. kicked by two or three of the others. But, looking forward, it looks like. seven people in the ring. Right? There'll only be one survivor, they think. Everything goes to the one who gets.

there first. What a difference this was to seven. well-behaved separate monopolies. Could. it possibly be more different? They made bundles of money on their. monopolies. Now, they have no monopoly. There are seven potentially. sharp-elbowed. ruthless. players determined to fight out with. each other until. they win. >> And who do you think will win? >> Ah, I don't know. That would be That would be good to.

know. >> Because SpaceX seem to be aiming more at. the infrastructure of um data centers. now. Data centers in space. Lots of. people saying that the the the best way. to run a data center, which is the. hardware that powers AI, is going to be. from space. And so maybe they're going to try and. find their own lane within AI, and. they're going to get away from trying to. build a frontier model like a ChatGPT or. a Gemini or Claude. And I mean, let's let's see what. happens. So, maybe Apple will just say, "Fuck it. We're good at hardware, so.

we'll license the model off someone. else, and we won't try and build a. frontier model or get involved in chips. or data centers. We're just going to focus on the. hardware.". >> One or two of them, and perhaps it's a. pretty smart strategy, will try and opt. out of that struggle. >> Mhm. >> Because [clears throat] it it it's going. to be. obviously brutal. >> Much of the reason most people haven't. posted or built their personal brand is. because it's hard and it's. time-consuming, and we're all very, very. busy. And if you've never posted. something before, there's so many factors in your.

psychology that stop you wanting to. post. What people will think of you. Am. I doing this right? Is the thing I'm. saying absolutely stupid? All of these. result in paralysis, which means you. don't post, and your feed goes bad. I'm an investor in a company called Stan. Storage. You've you've heard me talk. about. And what they've been building is. this new tool called Stanley that uses. AI, looks at your feed, looks at your. tone of voice, looks at your history, looks at your best performing posts, and. tells you what you should post, makes. those posts for you. You can also you. just use it for inspiration. And.

sometimes what we need when we're. thinking about doing a post for our. social media channels is inspiration. Building an audience has fundamentally. changed my life, and I think it could. change yours, too. So, I'm inviting you. to give this new tool a shot, and let me. know what you think. All you have to do. is search coach.stan.store. now to get started. For every founder, there comes a point. in building a company where your job. shifts from being the person inside your. business actioning everything to the. person responsible for absolutely. everything. The only way I've been able. to make this shift across the different.

companies and teams I'm responsible for. is by knowing that the right systems are. in place to manage everything. Systems. that don't need me in order for them to. work. Our sponsor Pipedrive is one of. those systems, an easy-to-use. intelligent CRM tool for growing sales. teams. My teams use it and have for the. last decade because it's genuinely the. most effective way to run a sales. operation. Through one dashboard, you. get every deal visible, and every stage. of the sales process is clear, and what. needs to happen next is all there in. real time. When a system like this.

works, you don't need to be in every. conversation to know exactly if your. business is moving forward, where and. what the blockers are. Over 100,000. companies are already running their. sales on it. So, if you'd like to join. them, sign up at pipedrive.com/ceo, where you'll get an exclusive 30-day. free trial instead of the usual 14 days. No credit card is needed. That's. pipedrive.com/ceo. So, coming back to this point of the the. social societal effect of AI.

generally, robotics is exploding at the same time. We're seeing for the first time ever. these humanoid robots, which now have. intelligence because of AI, becoming. very, very good. There was a video the. other day of a company called Figure AI. where they showed a robot humanoid robot. on a production line sorting packages. against a human and the humanoid robot. did it I think I can't think I'm going. to get this wrong but it was in the. region of seven or eight days it stood. there and sorted packages and they live. streamed it next to a human being doing.

it. Now the human had to sleep and had. to go to the toilet. So the the humanoid. robot won and the job was very simple. The packages come down, you just have to. pick the package up, turn it over, get. it the right way round so the barcode's. facing down and put it back down. That is powered now because we have AI. Um I said this a couple of episodes ago. but my friend runs this big accelerator. for entrepreneurs in San Francisco and. when I went there a couple of years ago. it was all software startups. I went. there um recently and it was hardware. startups the whole building. I said why. why why is everyone doing robotics? He.

said well. we've always had the machinery that's. sort of like joints and arms and. the hardware. We the the intelligence. was expensive. Now we have both and it costs pennies. So there's this boom in robotics. I say. all this to ask the question in a world. where we have super intelligence and we. have robots. there must be surely significant job. disruption. >> Very likely that there will be. significant job disruption. You know,

one of the scary things about SpaceX is. you should wish that it not. work out because if it became a bargain. rather like Tesla long ago became a. bargain. it will mean that we have done. satellites from space beaming down. power for chips and so on. The population. of chip users has expanded that robots. are everywhere, that energy demand is.

massive beyond belief. and uh. the world is. a very very dangerous place. I had much. prefer them to fail and the ideas to. move much more slowly. to buy time for humans to work these. things out. So, and I think that's much more likely. >> You think SpaceX will fail? >> I think it will fail to deliver anything. like its promises in the prospectus. Yes, absolutely. >> I'm an investor in SpaceX, I should. probably declare that. >> Yeah, well, you should. And good luck.

>> I invested quite early, quite well, relatively early. Um so, we've had quite a good outcome. I. There wasn't an AI thesis when I. invested. It was Starlink. >> Yeah, yeah, Starlink, great idea. By the. way, makes money. But this is not Starlink. >> Mhm. >> Maybe I'd be an investor too if it was. Starlink. >> Yeah. It was a hundred billion dollars roughly. in that region when I invested. So, it's what it rose up to three. trillion today. >> Yes, nice investment.

>> Not a bad investment, yeah. >> But it doesn't really count until you've. cashed it in. >> Yeah, which I might do now. >> You have Don't you have to wait six. months? >> I think yeah, I think we're locked out. >> In another podcast I was comparing the. purchase of my Tesla six years ago. with the price of Tesla stock. And I wrote it up in my quarterly letter. uh to the clients. that A, I bought a Tesla and B, I. thought Tesla was overpriced. And fast forward, Tesla stock went up 10. times over the life of my car, which.

still hasn't been incidentally into the. garage once. >> It's a great car, isn't it? >> Uh I imagine though, but but people who. really hate futzing around with cars, that component that they don't have to. go to the garage. is so underestimated until you enjoy it. >> Never bet against Elon, then. >> So, then the story becomes. from where we were 10 years ago, he. couldn't get there. It wasn't profitable. enough. It couldn't grow as fast as it.

should. There was no way. And he broke. the rules the following way. He's so good. at BS. I That's a technical term. That he. talked the stock up to four or five. times what it what it was worth on. paper. Then he sold lots of stock. at five times what it was worth. Used the money to build a gigafactory. And then instead of the sale of stock. crushing it, he kept on talking up the. game. The stock kind of hung in.

and then went up again. Five times what it was worth. Sold. another big slug, etc. etc. So, the only. reason he did well was because of the. combination of incredible. confidence inspiring in potential. stockholders. It became a self-fulfilling prophecy. It. wasn't worth that, but he persuaded. other people that it was. The stock went. up, he cashed it in, he built factories, the stock went up, he cashed it in, he.

built more factories, and there we were. It went up 10 times. Now, the scale of SpaceX requires them to do. the same again. And the timing of the market cycle, the. timing of confidence, would have to be the same. He had in the last six years a wonderful. bull market. He will not in SpaceX do. that. SpaceX is such a fabulous. BS story. Mining asteroids. Huge incredible success of AI.

It's the classic. description of a market peak. It's what. you look for at the top of a terrific. bubble. >> I've got a Tesla. Um. I've seen the that massive rocket, the. Starship, be caught with those. chopsticks. >> Everyone has seen it. It's the defining. feature of technology, isn't it? It's. magnificent moment. >> When I. >> That's worth half the the of SpaceX. [laughter]. >> I think that's why I invested when I saw. that. But but also I've seen with.

Neuralink I've seen people that are. paraplegic controlling computers. Uh my Tesla drives itself for hours and. hours and hours without me touching the. pedals or the steering wheel because it. can see the road and navigate itself. But to his credit as an innovator, he. has created magic. So when you say about mining asteroids, if if they if they told me we'd have. reusable rockets that you could catch on. chopsticks, I would have gone B S. There's no way. You can't catch like a 70-ft building. >> in the laws of physics.

>> That's what he. >> that says you can't do that. >> That's what he says about the asteroids. That's what he says about everything. He. goes. If it's within the laws of physics, then it's possible. >> Going to Mars is not within the laws of. physics, really. It's a one-way ticket to Mars for. starters. When you're on Mars, humans do a couple. of things really quickly. Their heart. adjust to the fact that there's 1/5 of. the. gravity. Your heart loses its muscle. power.

And your bones lose their internal. strength. If you come down, your heart will fail. and all your bones will crack. >> But you could be in an insulated. environment, no? >> First of all, you'd have to go under. underground. to avoid. the incredible incoming. rays. that will otherwise give you cancer in a. few weeks. So dig a deep hole. and then you need a gravitational. spinning machine, shades of. 2001 or whatever it was called.

And that maintains your gravitational. impact. And you have to build it. underground. You have to protect yourself. >> [laughter]. >> against cosmic rays and against the. gravitational difference. Listen, we have not been able to build. a sustainable system in a dome. ever. They all fail. Why would you not, let's. say, "Guys, let's build a sustainable. dome where you grow food, you put in.

people, you put in creatures, and then. insects, and you show you can do it." I. mean, we're destroying the damn planet. And yet we think we can go to another. infinitely more hostile planet than this. one. >> I do agree with you on that. I do agree. with us. I think we should focus on our. planet first and foremost. >> That's the really bad news embedded in. your stock. It's really. suggesting fantasy and. long-term objectives at the very time. when our own planet is under threat. >> Would you ever invest in SpaceX?

>> Yeah, of course, if it came down to. >> where I invested. >> 10 cents on the dollar, yeah. I might. 5. cents. >> Okay. You've got three children? >> Yes. >> Three children. They're they're all, you. know, older than me now, I believe. I'm. 33 years old, so they're all. >> Yes, they're all older than you. >> They're all older than me. But when they. were, you know, if they were young now, and they came to you and they said, "Dad, listen, I heard about all this AI. stuff, and I'm about to go off to. university and train myself. What what. skills should I be thinking about for.

the future ahead?". >> My take is I'd like them, as they are, to be involved in climate change work. >> If they said, "Dad, listen, I you know, I don't. >> Be an engineer. Do something really. useful that will come in handy if things. start to unravel. >> What what will. >> Practical skills. >> What what are practical skills? >> Well, our second son. um is practicing growing various crops. and has a small farm, you could say.

So, he's trying to get to know how you. would deal with chickens, how you would. deal with pigs, how you would deal with. mushrooms. >> What why does that matter, do you think, based on the future that you're. forecasting? >> I think there's quite a good chance. that the the level of complexity of our. civilization will start to. to unravel. Lose the plot at the ends is the first. thing that would go. I'll tell you a. good sign. How long does it take to get. your ambulance? >> I've heard that in the UK. >> In the UK it was 12 and 1/2 minutes.

>> Yeah. >> It's now an hour and a half. >> Really? To get an ambulance? >> It's exactly what you would expect as. people begin to lose the plot a bit. They fray at the edges. People can't buy houses. People don't feel they can do as well as. their parents. People are basically disgruntled. They. want to vote against the party in power. You know that the recent move to Trump. was less than the average move of the. last seven European elections.

It didn't matter whether they were. right-wing conservatives, kick the. rascals out. Left-wing French, kick them. out. And why do you want to kick them. out? Because you don't think things are. going well. You're not feeling. really happy. You're disappointed. >> Why? >> Why? Obviously, the government's doing a. bad job. I think that's the reflex. >> What are What are the government doing. wrong? >> It may be that it's not the government. doing anything wrong. It's just that the. environment is becoming tougher. >> As in the economic environment? >> The economic environment, the.

>> The rich are getting richer, the poor. are getting poorer. >> I think that's the biggest economic. problem. I mean, the US now has a genie ratio. like which is a measure of how unequal. your society is. Um which is up there with Brazil and. Mexico they used to be. a joke. And now the US is up there. Since about. 1975. all of the wealth we're talking about. has gone to the top 10% and a lot of. that to the top point 01. Before that by. the way, from 1935 from FDR to 1975.

so that's 40 years. we had a. wonderful period of growth. We had gains of over 3 and 1/2% a year. But the nice thing was that the poorest. quarter made a little bit more than. average, let's say 4 percent, and the. richest quarter made a little less, let's say 3 percent, and everybody got. richer. Everyone was happy. And then from '75 onwards, basically the. average hour worked in America has. barely gotten more adjusted for.

inflation than it did in 1975. >> The richest 1 percent of Americans. control 31 percent of the nation's. entire wealth, and by contrast, the. bottom 50 percent of the entire. population shares just 2.5 percent of. the wealth. The richest 10 US. billionaires saw their wealth surge by. 526. percent, adjusted for inflation, between. 2020 and 2025. Between 1989. and the mid-2020s, the financial gain of. a single household at the top 1 percent.

threshold was 987. times larger. than the gain of a household in the. bottom 20 percent. >> Forget In a sense, the bottom 20 percent. is tragic, but the guy in the middle, the 50th percentile, he is. unhappy, also. And when your average guy. is unhappy because he's not doing very. well, you know you have a problem. >> What is that problem, this inequality. we're seeing across the Western world? What does history tell us happens next?

>> All bad. We had a. similarly unequal society back in the. so-called Gilded Age. of the 1880s and '90s and so on. We got. lucky in a in an ugly way. We ran into. World War I, which was catastrophically expensive, killed off a huge fraction of the. officer class, and then we went into the. Great Depression. Then we went into World War II.

We came out as a uh. very equal society by historical. standards. Obviously, in the war time you pull. together and. the social contract, the feeling that. you owe something to the rest of society. was much stronger. than it is today. >> I was doing some research and said when. wealth inequality peaks to the extremes. that we currently see in the US and the. UK, history shows that the system inevitably. resets. According to historical macro. studies, peaceful policy changes almost.

never fix extreme inequality. [clears throat]. Historically, a wealth peak is broken by. one of three violent or catastrophic. triggers. Number one, total civil collapse and. state failure. Number two, mass. mobilization warfare. Or number three, total revolution. >> Yeah, and that's why. number two was lucky. In the end, it's better to have a war. and have everyone. pull their weight and and and work.

together than it is the other. You Civil. wars are the worst of all kinds. >> What do you think is likely to happen? It can't just keep becoming more and. unequal. >> No, it can't. So, it it needs. a government. that is prepared to pull a Bernie. Sanders. to say, "Yeah, we're going to have to at. least. in a gentle and long-term way shift the. tax structure in favor. of of a slightly steeper curve.".

>> So, you mean taxation needs to go up. >> Yeah. >> We need to tax the rich. >> and help. the poor. It's pretty simple. And and you have a. kind of steepness in every society. That's what they do. Every Every developed country in the. world taxes the rich and helps the poor, don't they? It's a question of degree. We did. much more. helping the poor. and taxing the rich. in the 1950s and '60s and '40s than we. do today. And somewhere between that.

level and the current level. might be more than enough if we just. started. to adopt the policy of 1935 to 75, where. the bottom quarter get a half percent a. year richer than the average. And the top dogs. get half a percent less each year. than the average. That sounds pretty. unthreatening. I think we would ease our. way over several decades. uh into a better place. >> If you were 33 now, my age,

and you were trying to accumulate. wealth, >> Oh god, I wish I was 33. >> Do you? >> It's such an exciting time. >> What would you give to be 33? >> I There's nothing I can give. >> No, but it would you I I find this. funny. It's I heard someone ask a. question like this the other day. They. were They said like, "Would you give. your your entire available net worth to. be 33?". >> Yeah, I think. everyone says yes. I mean, how did one. get a net worth by. by work and luck and.

creativity, all those good things. >> If you were 33 now in this moment in. time, and your objective was And this is. a bit of a crass objective, but I'm. going to It sounds like it's a very. one-dimensional objective, but if your. objective was just to become rich now at. 33, what strategy would you deploy? Again, I'm going to take away your. contacts. I'm even going to take away everything. you know. So, you'd have to go on the journey of. acquiring new information. What would. you do? >> I think the simple appeal would be to.

get your tail into AI. and and try and be a leader. Try and know more about everything in. that area than the next guy. >> Mhm. >> Join [clears throat] a leading firm and. uh. and go for broke. You may end up. encouraging. the destruction of the human species, but. you asked a simple question, and I give. you what I think is the simple answer. >> And what I I there is you want to make. sure you're riding a wave that's coming. into shore and you're on the forefront. of that incoming wave. Like we saw with.

the tech bubble, we saw with you know, we're now seeing with the AI bubble. So, it's really about. acquire the most valuable information. >> Yes. And take lots of risk. Don't be conservative. >> And work hard. >> And work hard. And think outside the box. I mean, I think that the biggest. deficiency. uh most people is that they feel. constrained. uh to play the game by the regular.

rules. And to believe that experts. and authorities know what they're doing. And and that as you know, probably, it. just ain't so. >> What if I'm trying to invest? So, say. that I've got $1,000 or $10,000 and I. want to invest it somewhere that's going. to. not lose me money through all of these. cycles of, you know, boom and bust. Cuz I'm I'm in you know, I I have a lot. of people message me and ask me about. investing because I interview lots of. people about investing. I have my own. investment fund as well.

Um. But what advice do you give for the. average person that's looking to invest. their salary or their wages? >> Buy a broad-based index of uh. non-US equities. >> Non-US? That's really surprising to me. >> For um like 60% of your money. And then 5 or 10% in precious metals and. uh. if if it's convenient and sensible, hold. hold a bit of real estate. And the rest. I'd put in uh bonds. >> Okay, so 5 or 10% in things like silver.

and gold? A preference for either silver. or gold? >> No. >> Um [clears throat] S&P 500? Now, you. said non-US. >> Non-US. >> This is so interesting cuz everybody. says invest in US stocks. >> Of course they do. They've been. completely dominant for 20 years. Completely kicking ass around the rest. of the world. And then. in the last 12 months, emerging markets. is up 65% now. The S&P has done much. better than I would have guessed, but. it's only 25.

That's a lot less than 65. >> And I guess the strategy is quite. important here as well, which is you're. saying to hold these for a long time. Try not to buy and sell. >> And and try and look at where the cycle. has been. And I can tell you, and you. can see it for yourself, there has been. an enormous cycle in favor of the S&P, in favor of the American market over the. rest of the world. And do you think. America is going to keep on gaining on. the rest of the world? And of course you're going to say yes. now, because that's. that's the flavor of this market. We.

think that what is good today will. continue being good indefinitely, even. though history tells you that is. absolutely not the case. We live in a world that tends to rotate. from one to the other. We believe in a. world that extrapolates today's. conditions. And you can easily prove. that. The stock market is not efficient. The stock market extrapolates today's. conditions. If they are terrible. in 1982, they will take crushed earnings. and multiply it by seven times earnings.

And then, in 2000, peak profit margins. times, woo, 35 times earnings. They. double count in the worst way. When. times are good, you multiply it by a. lot. That's another way of saying you. extrapolate it into the distant future. >> You assume it's going to continue. >> And Keynes, of course, my hero, says, "Of course that's. extrapolation is the convention you. adopt, even though you know from. personal experience that the world is. not that way.". >> You didn't use the word crypto.

when you're talking about investment. strategies. How much crypto do you own? >> None. >> Have you ever owned any crypto? >> No. >> Will you ever own any crypto? >> No. >> Will you ever advise anyone to buy. crypto? >> No. >> Why? >> I think it's a. an unnecessary. uh. piece of uh. nonsense. It facilitates nothing except criminals. moving money. so they can't be seen. It's not a store of value since it.

bounces around all over the place just. down from 120 to 60. because it felt like it. So, it's not. stable. It's volatile as hell. It's not used conveniently as a medium. of exchange. You can't go into a shop. and use it easily. It does one thing. very, very well. It's a means of speculating beautifully. >> Do you think Bitcoin's going to go to. zero? >> Well, in the distant future, yes, it will. certainly go to zero, but it may take a. long time.

And and, you know, in the distant. future, everything goes to zero, so. >> What about property as an investment? Because the first sort of reaction most. people have when they have enough money. to make an investment or to buy. something is they buy a property as an. investment asset. So, people go buy. themselves a house, they'll move into. it. We're kind of told that that's how. you start to accumulate wealth is you go. buy yourself a house. What do you think of that? >> It's hard to imagine how it could be a. good decision. when uh there's such an increasing. fraction of people.

who can't afford it. And there is a political resistance, you. know. >> Doesn't that just mean that the if, you. know, if I buy one now and increasingly. people can't afford one, doesn't that. mean that my my house is going to be. worth more in 10 years' time? >> No, if people can't afford it, there's. no one bidding. And by the way, the population is going. to decline. Young family formations are already. declining in. many of the richer countries. And if you have family formations. declining and you have super expensive.

houses, what do you think is going to. happen? Now, you could say, "Well, perhaps there will be a mysterious. increase in family formations.". And that the chronic baby bust that we. maybe will talk about soon. Um, we'll. stop. I don't speak Vietnamese, but this show. can because of AI video technology from. our sponsor, HeyGen. I get messages. every single week from those of you. listening to the Diary of a CEO all. around the world, and you express how. much impact it's had on you and your.

life. And if that's true, then those. conversations shouldn't only reach. people in English. HeyGen can take one. recording of me and deliver it in any. language while keeping my voice, timing, and expressions intact. But you don't. need a studio like this to make it work. for you. Record 15 seconds of yourself. and get an AI avatar that delivers. studio-quality video in over 175. languages. We're up to 20 languages now, and we're not the only ones using it. HeyGen is already used by 30 million. people, including 85% of the Fortune.

100. Whether you're building an audience. on social media, launching an online. course, or rolling out training across. your team, check out HeyGen now. Your. first three videos are totally free at. heygen.com/doac. That's h e y g e n .com/doac. See you there. This is something that I've made for. you. I've realized that the Diary of a. CEO audience are strivers, whether it's. in business or health. We all have big. goals that we want to accomplish. And. one of the things I've learned is that.

when you aim at the big, big, big goal, it can feel incredibly psychologically. uncomfortable because it's kind of like. being stood at the foot of Mount Everest. and looking upwards. The way to. accomplish your goals is by breaking. them down into tiny, small steps, and we. call this in our team the 1%. And. actually, this philosophy is highly. responsible for much of our success. here. So, what we've done so that you at. home can accomplish any big goal that. you have is we've made these 1% diaries, and we released these last year, and.

they all sold out. So, I asked my team. over and over again to bring the diaries. back, but also to introduce some new. colors and to make some minor tweaks to. the diary. So, now we have a better. range for you. So, if you have a big. goal in mind and you need a framework. and a process and some motivation, then. I highly recommend you get one of these. diaries before they all sell out once. again. And you can get yours at the. diary.com. And if you want the link, the link is in. the description below. Let's talk about the chronic baby bust.

I've been hearing a lot in the news. I. think there were some articles that. actually came out this week in the New. York Times that talked about the. declining fertility rates and how young. couples like me, I'm in a you know, I'm. I'm engaged to a young woman who. and me and me and her are trying to have. a child now. Um it's not not always a straight line. to having a child. Yeah, I think you're. kind of sold the idea that it is, that. you just have sex without a condom and. then a baby appears, but um lots of. young families and lots of my friends. who are trying to have kids have gone. for a couple of years.

trying and struggling to con- to. conceive. So much so that after doing. this podcast, I started telling some of. my friends that I actually think it's a. good idea to start freezing your eggs, embryos, sperm. Because if it is going to get. increasingly harder, then there might. need to be. um medical interventions, IVF, um etc. for me and my friends. If we are if we you know, if we want to. have families. But the the problem is as. well at like 33 years old, um if you. look at the data, you're not at your.

peak necessarily in terms of fertility. You're somewhere you're coming down the. slope as a man. Um and but also as a. woman. And so, you're kind of fighting time a. little bit it feels like. >> Yeah, you are. >> And I think my partner feels the same. way that we wish we were told a little. bit earlier about family planning. And then I hear that about this fert-. these fertility issues that apparently. have been caused by toxins. and that sort of chemicals in our. environment. You have spent a long time. thinking, writing, talking about this. >> Yes. >> I guess the first question is why? Why.

is a guy that's known for managing. billions and billions and billions of. hundreds of billions of dollars talking. about fertility? And this sort of baby bust. >> Well, starting. 27 years ago with the. foundation, we were committed to start. thinking about everything to do with the. climate. And and you're moving in the. right circle then, because the next. thing is we started to worry about the. cataclysmic decline in insects. I don't. know if you're aware of this, but.

insects appear to have dropped in. biomass, the weight of the flying. insects, by 50 to 75%. >> Really? >> In the last 60, 70 years. And E.O. Wilson, the famous ant man, he. believed that you know, nature could. handle. the loss of humans easily, effortlessly, but it could not handle the loss of of. insects. That insects are in in the. sense, he felt, and and his fellow experts, he. represented them as thinking the same. way, that they Insects are the bedrock.

of nature. And if they start to go out of business, then the. birds who feed on on them and the. amphibians, they start to decline, which. they have done also catastrophically. One thing leads to another, and the. beetles are no longer. recycling the forest floor, and. eventually things won't grow, and. no one to uh. fertilize the plants, and the damage. spreads, and he felt that eventually. loss of insects would lead to a more or.

less complete failure of nature. And and. we would inherit a planet that was no. longer conducive to humans. We noticed that some of the same effects. are felt uh by humans. And uh a report came out, Shanna Swan and Hagai Levine, I think it finished in 2011, and uh it made the case. that uh sperm count had been dropping. had almost halved since the first.

reports academic reports in 1970. So, I immediately said this has the. feeling of something that is really. important. We got to study the data and the results. came out suggesting that the decline. rate was accelerating. The decline rate. this year is 2 and 1/2% a year. You. don't have to be mathematically that. literate to realize that a 2 and 1/2%. decline in your sperm count every year. is a disastrous level, a non-sustainable. level, right? >> How long is that going to take for this.

my sperm to basically not work? >> As far as we can tell, our best guess. is. that in hunter-gatherer days we had 118. million units per milliliter of sperm. And when the academics came in in 1970, uh. it was down to about 100. And today it's 35. Okay? Also, the quality. and the mo- motility they call it had. also declined. somewhat similarly.

It turns out, luckily for us, that we. were over-engineered at I like to say. like a great Victorian bridge. Nature doesn't take any risks and and. you have more than you need. And it it. appears, again, a good guess is about 45. million units. is what you need to be able to get. pregnant without any difficulty. And. that was hit about 15 to 20 years ago. The number of young couples who needed. help 15 or 20 years ago.

uh was nil, basically. And for this reason, that none of them. had a a chronic lack of sperm count in. round numbers. And now. the World Health says it's about. 17%. Okay? 17% of young couples could use. some help today. It which means that instead of, you. know, just trying for a week or two or. three or four or five or six you're. trying for months and months. And. everybody knows people now who fall in.

that category. Which is exactly what you. would expect if you've gone from zero to. 17%. But this is the killer. Shanna Swan. and my colleague and I kind of thought. about this thing separately and. independently and we. we worked out doesn't take a great brain. that in 20 to 25 years the young couple. will need help. I mean this is tomorrow. You know this is not 200 years from now. In 20 to 25 years the average young.

couple will need help getting pregnant. >> Dr. Swan's projection indicates that if. the current rate of decline continues. unchecked the medium male sperm count is. on track to hit zero. by 2045. >> Wow, yeah. >> [laughter]. >> That is. that means the medium couple is not. going to have children without a lot of. help. >> It means half the male population will. have zero viable sperm and the remaining.

half will be right on the edge of. functional infertility. >> A few of them will still have plenty and. maybe 10% who are really perfectly. in decent condition. Because there's a huge distribution. range today. You know there are there are people. today who still have 200 million you. know better than the hunter-gatherers. But it's uh. >> And what is causing this and how do we. stop it? >> Shanna would say the environment around.

you. of mainly plastics. Plastics are leaching. uh toxins and the particles of plastics. you have in your brain and in your body. which we now know is quite substantial. are also leaching toxins. And these toxins are what they call. endocrine disruptors. They mess with. your hormones. You should expect them to lower your. fertility. And yet, the people who specialize.

in fertility problems. and write books about it, none of them. mention toxicity. They mention the hundred perfectly solid. reasons why people are choosing. uh to have fewer children. >> Endocrine disrupting chemicals like. phthalates, >> Like phthalates. >> which are found in cosmetics, shampoos, food packaging, etc. They actively lower. testosterone production in male fetuses. during the first trimester, permanently. stunting reproductive reproductive. capacity before birth. >> Yes. >> BPAs, which are um what they call the.

biphosphonates? >> Yes. Something like that. >> Used to make plastics hard, line tin. cans, and coat thermal store receipts. Um they are synthetic estrogens. They. flood the male body with female hormones. and signals crashing sperm count and. motility. PFAs, forever chemicals used in nonstick. pans, teflons, waterproof rain jackets, and stain resisting carpets. They break. down in nature, accumulate in human. blood, and are directly linked to lower. sperm volume. And then the microplastics.

you talked about, the chosen chose. Trojan horse. One of the shocking things. that I read was that it's been. discovered that they are physically. embedded in human placentas. >> Yes. Isn't that amazing? >> Breast milk and human testicles. And. there was a major study, I think we all. heard about in 2024, that found. microplastics in 100% of human. testicular tissues tested. 100%. And lastly, biological stresses. So, me and you being sat down on these. chairs, heats our testicles to a point where the. sperms die. Heated car seats, hot.

laptops, they actively cook the sperm. And lastly, obesity. >> Yes. And of course, smoking you, which. somehow slipped through the net. >> Yeah. >> But um. there is a whole other branch, pesticides on your food. Now, if you. give me time, I'll tell you about these. two little studies. They're very small, and you might ignore. them except they were done by Harvard. and Mass General, which is candidate for. the best hospital in America. And, uh they had a clinic for people.

having problem getting pregnant. And, uh they they ran it out of that. They had 180 men. And, they got them to self-report on. what they were eating. Were they eating. the dirty dozen? Were they eating melons. and bananas that have lots of. protection? At the end of uh 6 months, the the guys who reported to eat the. least bad. versus the quarter that ate the worst, there was a doubling of sperm count. Can.

you believe it? At the top category, the. more fruit and veggies you ate, the. better your sperm count. In the bottom. quartile, the more they ate, the worse. their sperm count. It was a dramatic result, but two to one. between the top and the bottom. And, then 2 years later, they did a very. similar study with women who were having. trouble. And, at the end of their 9 months of. self-reporting, the ones who ate the. least badly had 68% successful live. births, bearing in mind this was a. fertility clinic, and the bottom.

quartile 38%. So, once again, nearly. double. I mean, and and it's life and death. I. mean, these are really important. And, this was only based on what they ate. Because pesticides are full of these. toxins, and they are delivered straight. into your body. You eat the damn things. It's not just they're on the surface. You can wash some of that away, but. they're impregnated part of the. structure of the berry. Berries, apples, pears, peaches,

and finally, um uh spinach uh are really bad and are. the top end. The bananas and the. oranges, and the melons are uh fine. So, if you eat these damn things that. designed to kill our cousins, the. insects, and and the weeds, and the funguses, why would you expect. them not to do a terrible job on humans? And we stuff them in our system. And the fetus, it turns out, is 100 to. 1,000 times more vulnerable.

than we are out in the out in the world. For example, if your mother smokes, it's going to do about the same damage. as if you smoked for the rest of your. life. >> Hm. Wow. >> And you think about what the fetus is. plugged into the system, and how it's. forming everything. It doesn't seem the. most unreasonable thing that it would be. much more sensitive. And there are. people out there. fussing quite reasonably about the first. 1,000 days of life. But actually, that is nothing like as.

important. as the 270 days in the womb. >> Atrazine. Have you heard of atrazine? >> have. >> Atrazine, um referred to as the chemical. castrator. It is the second most widely. used herbicide in the United States, sprayed heavily on things like corn and. sugar canes. And there was this crazy study which was. peer-reviewed out of UC Berkeley that. showed exposure to atrazine at levels. below the EPA's considered safe for. drinking.

um levels, completely chemically. castrated male frogs, turning 10% of. them into fully functional females. capable of laying eggs. In humans, it is. linked to severe drops in sperm motility. and testosterone. >> And yet, we avoid the topic. We avoid the topic because it's. it's pessimistic. We're not fighting the. data. >> We just don't want to talk about it. >> want to talk about it. We don't want to. talk about bear markets. We don't want to talk.

about bad climate changes, even though. it's bludgeoning us. This year could be. the worst. hot year. in history. We are set up. because of the accident of the El Niño. to have perhaps the worst droughts and. the hottest weather ever recorded, starting about now. So, brace yourselves. But, we don't want. to talk about that. We don't want to. talk about toxicity. We don't want to. talk about running out of resources. Oh,

we just don't do bad news. And I have. never seen anything like this, this. fertility thing, where the data is. horrific. The baby bust is measurable. The sperm count is one of the few things. you can really measure. Do they really. think if you have declining sperm count, the future is great? Do they really think that the economy. will function. if the number of 20-year-olds entering. the market starts to drop like a stone? In Japan, you know what their. 20-year-old is? It's 50% of what it was.

in 1948. >> What is 50%? >> 50%. Not down 15 or 3.5, 50% less. >> 50% less 20-year-olds? >> 20-year-olds that drive the market, that. offer themselves for military service. >> What do we do about this? >> We have two things. We've got to. detoxify the world, which is. intellectually easy. You ban poisonous. chemicals. And we've made in the EU. pretty good start. My favorite example and everybody's.

favorite example is cosmetics. Cosmetics, you don't actually eat it, but you rub it on your skin, which is. the second worst thing to do. And there are 10,000 chemicals in. cosmetics. And the EU has banned 1,500. If they ban. the right 1,500, that could be 3/4 of. the battle, right? Canada's banned 550. And the US has banned 12. I am not. kidding you. So, The thing about toxicity is it is. regional. If one country if Denmark or.

the EU or the UK wants to look after its. chemicals, they will live longer and. have better health. If the US wants to. put the corporations first, they will. have shorter lives. Do you know the life. expectancy difference between the US and. Sweden has gone from 2 years to 6 years. in the last 70 years? I wrote in my quarterly letter my estate. would be willing to bet you that in 50. years it'll be 8 or 10. >> I don't quite think people in the United. States realize the difference in the. products they consume here versus other.

parts of the world. And you know, >> No, absolutely not. >> Brits fly over here and actually we had. my my barber my my barber Damon and he. flew over here to give me a haircut last. week. He said, "Oh gosh, I don't feel. good." He said, "I went and got some. food here and I really just don't feel. good." And he says, "Every time I come. over here I don't feel good." And me and. my team we used to fly over here before. I moved here for a couple of weeks a. year to film the show and whenever we'd. fly back not only would I be much. fatter, um but we'd all feel a little. bit more like sluggish, is the way I'd. describe it, from eating the food here. And it almost felt quite clear that. there's like something in the food that.

our bodies. just isn't used to in the UK. And when. you look at the toxicity of the United. States versus Europe, it's quite clear. I mean, the US currently permits the use. of 85 agricultural pesticides that are. completely banned in the EU, China and. Brazil. The US sprays over 300 million. pounds per year of pesticides that are. deemed too dangerous to be legally used. in Europe, including that one I said. about the frog's called atrazine.

>> atrazine. >> Which the EU banned over two decades. ago. We look at cosmetics, which you. were talking about then, what you put on. your skin obviously goes into your. bloodstream and so the EU has banned or. heavily restricted over 1,300 chemicals. in cosmetics and personal care products. due to toxicity and hormone disruption. The US and the FDA has banned 11. In. terms of food, the US allows potassium. bromate, which is a known carcinogen, cancer-causing, used to make fluffy. dough bread, and BHA.

{um} / BHT, which are preservatives. linked to hormone disruption. Both are. strictly banned from human consumption. in the UK and EU and Canada and China. And lastly, the US {um} allows titanium. dioxide, used to make candy smell like. Skittles bright white, and synthetic dyes like red 40, which. require strict warning labels or. outright bans in Europe due to DNA. damage and neurodevelopmental issues in. kids. I'll give you one more. A recent. US Geological Survey found that at least.

45% of all US tap water is contaminated. with PFAs, those forever chemicals we. talked about earlier, the very chemicals. directly linked to crashing sperm counts. and testicular cancer. The US has. historically allowed PFAs levels in. drinking water. drastically higher than the EU, the. United the European Union. considers safe. >> Let us just say that the EU is forever. giving exemptions and extensions and is.

far from perfect and has a lot of. corporate pushback. And uh it's just. much less bad than the US. >> And the US has worse life expectancy. >> It does, and it's the only rich country. in the world where 15 years ago they had. the same life expectancy as they have. today. >> One um actionable piece of advice for. anyone listening that might find this. all quite um. overwhelming cuz you know, lots of. things around us from receipts to the. pans we use to. range jackets contain these chemicals,

is there are apps out there. where you can scan the chemicals in the. foods that you're buying to check if. they contain these endocrine disrupting. these hormone disrupting chemicals. I'm. not affiliated [clears throat] with any. of them, but there's one called Yuka, YUKA, that I know is very easy for sort. of everyday scanning of products. You. can just scan the barcode and it'll tell. you it'll give it a rating score out of. 100. There's EWG's Healthy Living. um app which is the scientific gold. standard run by the Environmental. Working Group a major toxic chemical.

watchdog. You can scan barcodes or. search for food, cleaning supplies or. cosmetics. There's Think Dirty as well. which is great for cosmetic shampoos and. skin care. It exposes the toxic truth. hiding in beauty products. Um and then. there's Clear Ya which is Clear Ya. Best. for online shopping. It's an app in your. web browser and instead of scanning. barcodes in your house. while you're shopping online, it's so if. you add a say like a shampoo or lotion. to your Amazon or Target or Walmart. basket, it automatically pops up with an. alert telling you about the ingredients. list that is within those chemicals. But.

but I think that gives something a. little bit actual and arms you with at. least a tool to navigate this crazy. environment. And obviously AI is great. at this as well. You can take pictures. of things and ask it questions. >> And what we really need is a kind of. green Amazon where everything is. guaranteed food, bed, clothes, everything. And that would be very handy indeed. Someone you could trust that would. absolutely guarantee the whole line of. products that you would order. Not. impossible and I think done well and. someone could make money at it.

>> What would advice would you give to your. kids on a personal level if they're. trying to stay healthy in a toxic world? >> Simple advice and I know you like this. is pregnant women are much more. important than anybody else in this. field. If you could persuade pregnant women A. to have no cosmetics, save a lot of. money, no cosmetics for 9 months and. then B invest some of that money from. your cosmetics or all of it in buying. organic berries if you have to have. berries, apples, oranges, peaches.

what they call the dirty dozen here. If you did that. I think as much as half of all the. trouble disappears. And that's a huge fraction and it's. easily acquired. You know, I I I addressing the 100. things around in your environment, you. have to get to that. Typically, if you're lucky, you do one. thing after another. You get the gas. stove first, which is really noxious, and then you work your way the black. plastics, the Teflon frying pan. You.

work your way around it. Compared to. that, no cosmetics, no bad food, or make it organic. That's a piece of. cake. That is easy. It will save you. huge amount that you will never. appreciate because you'll never know how. much better your children are than they. would have been. >> Mhm. >> But, it's not only your children, by the. way. For women, you know, you're talking. about in particular because of the eggs, they are Every egg is all there in the.

womb. And then it goes on to your. grandchildren, we thought. At least we. could prove two generations. And and and. a recent study suggests it might be many. more generations than two. So, you got. some of these chemicals. impregnated in your system, and your. children pay the price, and your. grandchildren, and perhaps even. quite a few generations after that. >> I also think it would be great if. Western governments around the world.

made the costs of. both child care and but also fertility. treatments. significantly lower. >> And they will, of course. >> You know, I had a couple of. conversations on this podcast with very. successful women, including Ronda. Rousey, who was in tears because she was. on a. I think it's her [laughter] fifth or. sixth round of IVF treatments, and she. just found out just before she walked. into the studio that it hadn't gone. well. And watching her cry. about it and get very emotional meant. that that that day I walked out of this.

room and like called a lot of the people. in my life that I know are. you know, in the region where fertility. starts to decline, and really encourage. them to start thinking if they if that's. what they want in their lives about. family planning, which is like getting. your eggs frozen or your embryos frozen. And me and my partner actually went and. did it. We got our embryos frozen, which. was a you know, it's it's not it's it's. both expensive, extremely expensive, especially here in the United States, and difficult. >> And psychologically destructive. Brutal. >> You know, we you know, me every day for.

a couple of weeks injecting her with. with this this these chemicals and the. the hormonal roller coaster that she had. to deal with and all of that, but for us. the alternative was worse, which was never being able to have. children because it's difficult and. there's all these toxins in our. environment and and so on and so forth. And so I then became a little bit of a I. guess a bit of a bit preachy within my. within the people the people in my life. that I love a lot about family planning. cuz we kind of all thought we could just. think about it later.

We're all kind of 35 and we thought, "Yeah, we'll think about that later.". Um but it turns out not to be the case. for many people. >> If you'll allow me to go back, you asked. an important question. What do we have. to do? And I said we have to detoxify. the system and then we both got off into. this frenzy of of attacking chemicals, which we should anyway, but it's. intellectually easy. Ban the suckers, okay? Now, putting pressure on the. corporations to back off so the. governments can do it would be a good.

idea, not easy. Corporations have. enormous power, unprecedented power in. the US, but but very substantial power in the in. the EU and the UK also. But we have to. get them to back off. We have to start. banning these damn things, otherwise no. children. But secondly, and much more difficult, is we have to detoxify capitalism. We have to slowly but surely. turn our capitalist societal norms into.

much more family-friendly, children-friendly. Over the next several generations, we have to end up with a society that. realizes that 2.1 healthy, well-educated. children is a part of the commons. You. may not have any children. >> you mean by that, sorry? 2.1? >> 2.1 is the number of children it takes. for a rich society to have a steady. population. >> Per couple? >> Per couple. If you have less than 2.1. per couple, you fairly rapidly go out of business.

If you have more than 2.1, you fairly. rapidly end up with so many people. you're standing on each other's. shoulder. The commons are things like. common land in the old days that anyone. could put their sheep on. And what. tended to happen is everyone put more. sheep than they could stand, and they. pretty soon it was. it had no grass on it. Known as the. tragedy of the commons. And. we all need. clean air, clean water,

fertile soil, and 2.1 healthy, well-educated children. Without any of those, society fails. All of them have to be treated as group. responsibility. So, the whole society, the whole village. has to be in a way like a kibbutz. eventually. You have to put everything. behind making it doable. to have children because the long list. of economic and social reasons, as well. as toxin reasons, why people can't have.

2.1 children is getting so long and so. dangerous. And nothing yet has worked. I. mean, they've tried, you tell me, 200. different things around the world. Several percentage points of GDP in one. or two cases. And nothing yet has. seemed seen a permanent uptick in in. baby production. >> For the average person listening right. now, Dave who drives a taxi or Jenny who. works as a receptionist or um Clive who.

is a nurse, what is the most important thing we. haven't talked about that we should have. talked about as it pertains to their. life today? >> I think they have to brace themselves. for a tougher times ahead. than they would have they expected. And they're beginning to get the point. Life for the last 10 or 20 years has. been tougher than than they perhaps. expected as children or or than other. people expected for them. Part of that is politics. Part of that.

is equality. But the net effect of them. is times are tougher. It is more. difficult. to buy a house or afford to rent. And and jobs are getting scarcer. It's likely to get worse. >> What does brace yourself mean for them? Cuz brace yourself sounds like you. But does it mean. >> Plan your life as if times will not be. easy. >> Okay. >> And do not.

build up a little reserve of of cash. Of course my advice to. other people is and and get yourself a. useful job. Something that will in a. larger sense pull your weight in. society. >> Upskill, change skills, learn something. >> mechanical. fixing, repairing. >> Things that. >> engineering. >> Things that will need humans. >> And and research, science in general. >> Make friends. >> Make friends. Make sure you're living in in a a tight.

society if you can. Very difficult. today, obviously. >> Would you be thinking about the country. you live in at this moment in time? >> Absolutely. >> Really? Is there any countries you. wouldn't live in? >> [sighs and gasps]. >> If you were Dave or Jenny? >> I I think I have to refuse to answer. this on the grounds that it might tend. to incriminate me. Um. >> Oh, okay. So you're saying don't live in. the United States? >> Well, I have. American children and grandchildren. >> Why not the United States? >> It holds out too much chance that the.

social contract is. is. >> [snorts]. >> dissolving. You know, the thing about Japan and that. my joking rule 21 in investing is never. extrapolate from the Japanese. They are. extremely different in every way. But one of the ways they're different is. they have this amazing social contract. The thing that really upsets the. Japanese is if they're put in a position. where they can't act in a socially. responsible way. >> When you say social contract, what does. that mean? >> It means an agreement that I will behave. in a way that helps my neighbors and the.

society that I'm doing what people. expect me to do. I'm not going to. misbehave. >> And you think that's not the case here. in the United States? >> I think the case here is that people are. doing what they think is best for them. and their family and screw everybody. else, really. When I arrived in America, corporations. had this sense that they owed something. to the community they operated in, the. city they operated in. They They'd build. the stadium, they'd do this, they'd. they'd be part of the community.

Now they're not. They're all. in a way cold-blooded, profit-maximizing. international enterprises. >> And why is that a bad place to live? Cuz. you're saying, you know, you probably. wouldn't recommend Dave or Jenny living. in the United States. Why would that be. a bad place for them to be? What. happens? What's the What's the. downstream impact of that? >> That your neighbors aren't as interested. in you and your well-being. >> Fine. I don't I won't talk to my. neighbor. >> And that's a lonely place to be. And. when you're in trouble, you're in.

serious trouble. Uh because the safety net here is very. ineffective. There's a a measure that I. think is probably the single most. important measure of civilization, and. that is maternal mortality. How many. people die in childbirth? You know, in. Nigeria out of 100,000, it's 480, give. or take. And uh. in America, in in the. black population, it's uh 44. In the whole population, it's like 21 or.

20. Curiously, in the. American Asian population, it's 13. And then, you go down the list, and in Britain, it's five. In Germany, it's four. In Sweden, it's 2.1. In Norway, it's. zero. There were no mothers who died. last year. >> Hm. >> Or the year before. What better. definition of civilization than looking.

after the mothers giving birth? How is. it possible that a country. more or less the richest in the world, it's not just that they're the worst in. the rich world, it's that. they are 50% worse than the next worst. 50% more mothers die here than in the. second worst country in the developed. world. How is that possible? The answer. is it happens. And um it's because.

the inequality is so extreme in the. medical system. that if you don't have lots of money, you're quite likely to die in. childbirth. I mean, Now, of course, the numbers are not. huge. 20 out of 100,000 is not uh. but it's but it's a terrible contrast. >> It's a sign of something. It's a sign of something else as well. >> It's a sign of whether people are. It's a sign of the social contract. >> So, where's a good place to live then, if not here? >> Denmark, Japan. Uh even France, Germany. The UK has a.

little bit of the American disease, but. not nearly as much. >> So, if your kids came to you and said, "Dad, we're thinking of uh leaving the. United States. Should I move? Should I Should I move out of the United. States? >> Yeah, I I would say that's a perfectly. reasonable thing to consider. And where are you going and why and. what's your. >> I'm thinking of going to Denmark, Dad. >> Well, if they'll have you. Uh. No, uh. in the things that really matter, life.

expectancy, health, safety nets, uh murder rates, uh mortality rates, and everything that really matters, yes, they're they're day and night better. In the things that don't really matter, but look really splashy, we have enormous quantities of uh wealth. created. that go to a relatively small fraction. of the people. And that dazzles in terms of the average. because.

um that's how the numbers work. If you look at how well-off the bottom. quartile are, America doesn't score well at all. >> Jeremy, we have a closing tradition. where the last guest leaves a question. for the next guest not knowing who. they're leaving it for. The question. left for you is, if you could not fail, what would your next goal be. that you would set for yourself? >> There There was a book written. in the 1960s called Silent Spring.

Carl Carson, I think her name was. And it changed for a quite a number of. years it it it did what books never do. really it. it uh became a political monster and. everyone studied it and it had an. effect. It changed the game. I would uh like to write something about. toxicity and and social contract really. Particularly nurturing a family. We. We've got to find in the end a community.

that encourages children. The downside. of the. brutally efficient capitalist system. that we have. It's focus on. financial achievement and so on. And. very little emphasis on community and. child-rearing and so on. If we don't we. we fail as a society pretty quickly. We. have to detoxify. We have to encourage. to create an environment where people. want to have children. >> [clears throat]. >> If I could write a book.

that would be. would would pull a silent spring, I. would sit down tomorrow and start it. >> The making of a Parma bear. >> Parma should be in inverted commas, really. >> The perils of long-term investing in a. short-term world. By Jeremy Grantham and Edward. Chancellor. Who is this book for? >> Oh, people who have a interest in the. stock market. It has a little bit of. climate change and toxicity.

My my co-rider is a professional and he. tried to limit me quite sensibly. Feeling that our main market was. investors who would be turned off by too. much of the stuff we've been talking. about. >> You cover things also like economics, value investing, being a bear, and. predicting a bubble, and what to do. about all of those things. But it's. really a useful counterintuitive not. counterintuitive, but it's a it's a. frame of thinking that will help you be. more realistic especially when. psychology is prone to take over and. make you wildly recklessly optimistic.

>> And and be more confident in your. judgment. Big big companies cannot advise you. It's just suicidal for their business. So you are on your own. Look at the. data. A bubble is not hard to see. There. is this kind of plane and then there's a. Himalayan peak. which eventually goes back. >> And I mean that's exactly what we're. seeing. >> That's exactly what history looks like. Have the courage to look at that, make.

your own conclusion, get out of the. dangerous most dangerous part, and and do it now. Don't wait for help because no help is. coming. Large enterprises almost never get the. big turning points. because they can't take the career risk. involved. And every big corporation needs a leader. who has political skills. And the And the central political skill. in life turns out to be never be wrong.

on your own. This is again Keynes. You know, you can be wrong in company, you can jump off the cliff together, you. will never lose your job because of. that. But if you do anything on your own, sooner or later you will get it wrong. And quote, you will not receive much. mercy. >> Jeremy, thank you so much. Thank you for. all that you do. Um you traverse so many. subjects. It's It's absolutely. fascinating and you You've made me think. about so many things. I've actually. written down a bunch of ideas. You sent. me taking some photos then. Those are.

actually ideas that I want to remember. >> Yeah, that's what I do. Screenshot city. >> Yeah, so I took I just wrote things down. you were saying and then I was like I. need to remember that later for a bunch. of things, businesses, friends, family, etc. Um and I think that's the testament to. how broad and curious and wise you are. >> Going back to question one or two, the. billionaire bit, uh sometime around the end of this year. we will actually have written checks for. a billion dollars. to the climate change world. >> It's It's a wonderful thing and there's. you know this particular moment in time.

because of the politics, climate change. is a subject that's falling off the. radar. >> It is. >> Uh it's. being mentioned less in earnings calls. It's. >> But this year will be so disgustingly. hot from now on, I suspect. >> Disgustingly hot. >> Hot. We could have from now on the. hottest 12 months from now to this time. next year that we have ever had in. history. Here, there, and everywhere. >> Well, I'm glad we've got voices like. yours. um lending their ideas and wisdom to. these conversations and it's been an. honor and a privilege to to you. Your. book, The Making of a Manager, Baron, to. link it below.

for everyone to buy it themselves. Jeremy, thank you. YouTube have this new. crazy algorithm where they know exactly. what video you would like to watch next. based on AI and all of your viewing. behavior. And the algorithm says that. this video is the perfect video for you. It's different for everybody looking. right now. Check this video out, and I. bet you you might love it.