I Know Why Spineless MAGA Bow to Trump | The Daily Beast Podcast

They just have no courage. They have no backbone to stand up to this president. And that's why they have it in the last year. It is really a question of courage and whether or not they say I don't care. what this president does, I don't care if I put my own reelection at risk. I'm going to stand up for this country, because right now we have a dictator and a regime that is seeking to completely. destroy democracy, to enrich billionaires and a rich people like him. That's what all this stems to, by the way. It's not just the vanity project of Trump. This leads directly to profiteering. Making money and making money for his friends.

I'm Joanna Coles. This is the Daily Beast podcast, and today we're talking to one of the nine. Democrats who insist that President Clinton show up in front of the oversight. committee to talk about Epstein and what he knew about Epstein. He's also, however, someone who wants to impeach. Kristi Noem, Pam Bondi, Pete Hegseth and RFK junior. The moment the Democrats win back the House, if they ever do.

I am talking about Maxwell Frost, the youngest. member of the House of Representatives, who was 25 when he got elected. He's 29 now. He's in his second term, and you might have heard of him recently. because he was just having a drink at Sundance when a stranger came up. and just hit him in the face and said, that's. what's going to happen to people like you, and you're going to be deported. So no time to waste. Let's get into it. So, Congressman Frost, just.

tell us about the attack that happened on you in Sundance. Are you are you fully recovered? What happened? Yeah. I'm okay. And, you know, actually, at the time of the, assault, I wasn't bruised or bleeding or anything like that. I mean, it was painful, but I didn't bruise or anything. Essentially, what happened is. I was at a private event that a friend had invited me to at a bar, and a guy, broke into the event,

ran straight up to me, and, started. I first I thought I was just a drunk, confused guy, and then he turned. very violent and essentially started saying racist things to my friend and I. She is visibly a brown Latina, and talking about. how we were going to be deported were the kind that he was going to deport. And then he punched me in the face, like, right here on the face, knocked my glasses and, scary. Ran away.

Yeah. And he. And then he bolted and ran away and actually, apparently. And I didn't see this, but according to the police reports, he then went up to another person and a black woman and essentially. said, we're going to deport you to and pushed her into the bar. And then he was apprehended. He was quickly arrested by the, you know, has court. coming up and the whole thing, you know, it's an active investigation. So I don't not comment too much on it, but, that's pretty much what happened. And it all happened so quickly. And I was so shocked in the moment.

You know, I'm I'm not the type of person a bottle up my feelings, but I am the type of person that sometimes it takes me a few days. to fully process something. So even in the moment, I was like, okay. And then you know what kind of went on through the weekend? And it wasn't till I got home that I realized. I, you know, I was the victim of a hate crime. And that's exactly what it was. Especially because of what he said about me due to the color of my skin. and who I am my friend too. So it was a very scary thing. And, you know, the bigots are emboldened right now across the entire nation.

And it's important that, number one, we do what we need to do to protect ourselves. But number two, that we understand. It doesn't feel great to say this, but there is no space that is 100% safe. And so it's just important for us all to always just keep that in mind as we, you know, go to events and stuff, especially as elected officials. Sometimes I forget I'm a congressman when I just go out to events. And it's something I, you know, I, I'm going to take a lot more seriously now. Well, I was going to ask you, did you sense or do you know whether.

or not he targeted you specifically because you are a congressman, or did. he just burst into the party looking for some violence? And and you, one of very few black people, not 100% sure. There are actually a lot of people of color at the event itself. And a lot of black and brown people. But I'm but I'm unsure exactly what was behind. the whole thing and the initial reason he had broken in.

I know for a fact it was a hate crime. But that's something that's being investigated. He did come up to me. and start talking about political things and deportation, etc. so. Well, we interviewed Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett on the podcast, a month ago, and she said she now has to wear a bulletproof vest. Wow. Yeah. I mean, and that's something that's, you know, been suggested of me when I do parades and different stuff like that. And so then we do, you know, when needed. But it's, it's a very dangerous time for everybody, not just elected.

officials, but, but also particularly for elected officials as well. We saw what happened to Mr. Hortman, that assassination in Minneapolis. Yeah. Minneapolis. We, even years ago saw what happened to Nancy Pelosi's. husband and, that guy was there to kill her, right. And then even just in the last week with what happened to me. and what happened to Ilhan Omar. So it's a very, very scary. Yeah. And of course, we should throw in the Charlie Kirk of it all, too.

Yeah. Charlie Kirk being assassinated and murdered on a school campus. I mean, we can, you know, we can keep naming stuff. And just political violence is on the rise in this nation. And quite frankly, you know, it's something that's always. been around our country is a very violent history. And I think we've gone a few decades here where maybe a bit of. it was more tamper down and than it used to be.

But there's been periods of this country where just. political violence has been normal. We oftentimes like to authorize other countries and think we're the exception. on everything. But there is political violence in the United States. And, it's up to us to root it out and make sure that we heavily. condemn it and do what we can to keep each other safe. Well, then there's also violence. that appears to be coming from the state in the form of ice. We've seen two people shot on the streets of Minneapolis unarmed people, or certainly Alex Presti was unarmed by the time he was shot, disarmed,

I guess I should say. How does one, I mean, I, I want to ask you, what's the point of Congress right now? Because it seems to be a government of one, and Congress seems. almost pointless at this point. But before I do that, let me ask you, how do you think we can de-escalate the political violence? How do you think you can, as an elected official, de-escalate it?

I really think the ramp up of political violence. and what we've seen over the last decade is a direct result of Trump. I think Donald Trump has brought the worst out of everybody in this nation, and is part of the reason. we've seen things ramp up in the way we've seen in the last decade. 100% starts not fully, but starts, I think a lot with Donald Trump. And, and I think it's important that we call that out. I think we have to be careful. I think it is important that any leader ensure that their rhetoric.

isn't going to be misconstrued or used to, radicalize someone to the point where they cause violence. I always tell people it only takes one. It only takes one person hearing you say something, taking that as a call to violence and then acting on it. Period. And it's also important that we, you know, I don't buy into this thing. where oftentimes reporters or different people will say, well, a lot of times you're very direct about what you believe in. Do we need to turn that down? No, the answer is no.

And we can't allow political violence in the fact that there is political violence. Put us in a position where we won't call balls and strikes, put us in a position. where we won't call out the fact that ice executed. and I would say, murdered two people. in the middle of the streets as they were exercising their First Amendment rights, many would say, Maxwell, what you just said leads a political violence. I disagree, and I think there is a very. there's a fine line, but I think we all know what that line is.

It's the fact that we are a violent nation. We're a nation that has more guns than people in it. And so when people are, it can easily get the means to do political violence. on others. We have stuff happen like we saw happen with Charlie Kirk, like we saw happen. I mean, even people. President Melissa Hortman, Nancy Pelosi's husband. I just think, like, we have to have both conversations. because I don't want it to seem like. we don't want people to say what they actually feel.

Because, because of the political violence. we have, that is how you let those actors win, by the way. That's how you let these people who have decided to be violent. When is when you decide to shut up about what really matters? Do you are you surprised that the president, keeps up his level of rhetoric, given that he's had not one, but two assassination attempts on him, one of which. a bullet grazed his ear in as much as we understand what happened.

And then another time, a guy got up very close to him on, on a golf course with. We all saw the pictures of the rifle butt poking through the fence, and that he just got, sentenced to life imprisonment this week. I'm not surprised, because this is this is the president's M.O.. This is what he thrives on. This is how he built his political movement. Is on violent language. Not just not language. It's true to what he believes in. Right? Which is what we were just talking about.

But violent language that is meant to shock everybody. And that's how he rose to power, and that's how he's going to stay in power. I think that's what that's what he believes. And so regardless of what happens or whatever the consequences are to others. or himself, I think he'll continue down that path. Okay. So let's talk about what it's like. What does it feel like being in Congress right now? Obviously, you're in the minority party, but but. I mean, it seems completely pointless and toothless.

Congress at this point. The president is doing whatever he wants. He's not asking permission, to Congress for anything, for Venezuela, for blowing up boats in the Caribbean, for the Trump Kennedy Center. He's literally acting almost as a rogue president at this point. Yeah. I mean, he he's he's acting like a dictator. This is a regime that has been put into place. So all the checks him, not all of them, but a lot of the checks and balances are moot right now. because and a big reason why is because the majority in Congress are Republicans.

And Mike Johnson have given the power of Congress to the president. So the president's also the speaker of the House. So you're hundred percent right. I want to say con, Congress is pointless right now because, believe it or not, 45% of all the executive orders Donald Trump has done. have either been reversed, pause or stop due to court orders or, congressional appropriation, different things like that. So it's not it's he doesn't 100% doing everything he wants.

And I always have to remind people that he's a liar. Right? So when he takes to the mic and says he's going to do something. and we freak out about it, which we should just remember, he's a liar. And, a lot of this stuff will never happen. But when he makes you believe that it has happened or will happen, he is already one and done a lot of studying. into fascist, but specifically authoritarian leaders. You know, most of authoritarian leaders are kind of bad legislators. Most of their power doesn't. really come from legislating it and it happening, being put into law.

But they get most of their power through their rhetoric. and through people obeying in advance. And then them effectively convincing the opposition that all hope is lost. and that there's nothing they can do about it. And so I think we always got to stay very like focused here. I'm not saying calm down, people. I actually say this to empower us to fight back even more, because we do have the ability to win. Look at what's going on across the country. Like I said, 45% of the stuff this guys wanted to do has not.

come to fruition. And that's because the people power look at Minnesota. The fact that he occupied this city, the people. continued to fight back and fight back, did not allow this administration. to make them think there's nothing we can do. And now we've seen 700 Ice agents are being withdrawn from Minnesota. There's so lot more work that needs to be done. I'm not saying everything is peachy and fine. Two people were murdered and executed in the middle of the street.

We've had 35 people in the last year that have died in Ice detention centers. That doesn't get spoken about enough. But I, I just hope people know that there is. there is things we can do to push back. But Congress is it is. We've completely given up our power to the presidency. And this is part of the reason why, of course, the midterms are so important. But most of my work has been focused on oversight. and figuring out ways outside of the system as it as it exists,

that I can do what I can do to protect my community. and not be the minority, but be the opposition in this moment, which is what I think we need to be. What are you hearing? And I'm always curious about this. What are you hearing from your Republican colleagues in Congress, some of whom are just as appalled about what's going on as you are? But, are either terrified of being primaried. or being singled out by Donald Trump. What did they say to you behind closed doors.

when that when no one is listening? I'm not sure any of them are as appalled as I am. But let's say there was some that are that are appalled or are not feeling good. They just have no courage. They have no backbone to stand up to this president, and that's why they haven't in the last year. Now we're starting to see cracks, right? We're starting to see more and more of them, not just speak out. Because speaking out okay. Thank you. But doing something about it. and more and more of them are deciding to do something about it. But little by little we see people stepping up.

But it is really a question of courage and whether or not they say, I don't care. what this president does, I don't care if I put my own reelection at risk. I'm going to stand up for this country, because right now we have a dictator and a regime that is seeking to completely. destroy democracy, to enrich billionaires and a rich people like him. That's what all this stems to, by the way, it's not just the vanity project of Trump, but this. This leads directly to profiteering, making money. and making money for his friends. And I just think it's important.

for people to always remember that it's all connected to the money, and it's all connected to to this insane greed that we have in this country. All right. Well, just. I mean, let's come back to the grift that's going on and the $4 billion. that we think Donald Trump has made, if not indeed more than that. And goodness knows how much his friends have made members of his family have made, Thomas Massie. is one of the congresspeople that I think you might be referring to when you talk. about Republicans that have actually done something standing up. And obviously with Ray Connolly demanded the release of the Epstein files.

You're on the oversight committee. The the Epstein files has been this extraordinary dump. Nobody knows how to go through it. It's being attacked very piecemeal. It's they're not a more effective way for us to understand quite. what's in the Epstein files. Do you mean in terms of, like, going through them and kind of connecting them? Yeah. I mean, what why why didn't the Oversight Committee demand that there was,

you know, a proper panel put together to go through. and search for specific names, specific threads? I mean, it's as if someone is literally dumped 303. million emails and just said, okay, have at it. Well, this is. part of the reason why being in the majority so important. I mean, it's kind of more than double our staff on the oversight committee. and our ability to be able to present this and go through the information.

But to be clear, like it being dropped on, dropped on us. like this, that's what Donald Trump ran on release that scene files. That's what the American people ask for. Release. Release the files. Right. It's what we've been told. Release the files. And that's what we fought to do. And I think you'd be hard pressed to find an opposition in Congress. on the history of this nation. that's been able to pass as many bills via discharge petition. of we've as we've been able to do just in the last year. And obviously the, con MRC bill is one of the most important ones.

But we got to be clear, number one, Donald Trump broke the law. and waited over a month to release the bulk of the files. By the way, we don't have all the files yet. We're still doing the math to figure out how much is left. But there's a lot that they have not released. And a lot of these redactions are not acceptable. But we got to remember that most of the information that we got. that's been very damning and helpful in this investigation, whether it's the birthday card that Donald Trump wrote to Jeffrey Epstein.

that had him drawing a prepubescent, essentially a teenager or a child, saying. Jeffrey and I were a lot alike, that didn't come from the Epstein files. We've been working at subpoenaing things all year, on from many different places. We subpoenaed the banks, we subpoenaed the estate. Most of what we've gotten that's been helpful hasn't even come from. the government. It's come from other things that we've subpoenaed. This investigation will take years. I know some people are under the illusion that there's going to be some kind of. drop in a bombshell that, you know, changes everything day to day.

That's not how this will work. It'll be more like Watergate in that it'll be a drip, drip, drip of information. For a while it was seen as a sideshow for a while. And then we start getting big pieces of information where we connect the dots. And I think that's really what's, what's going to happen with this. And a lot of it is going to be unlocked once we're in the majority and we're able. to, number one, Sue, but number one, but also able to issue our own subpoenas. And what just happened with, you know, the majority wanting to subpoena.

Bill and Hillary Clinton, I think, has really set a new standard, because we will you know, we will subpoena at some point. Donald Trump as it relates to this and and a lot of other things as well. So Donald Trump will be subpoenaed to appear before the oversight committee. to talk about the Epstein files. at some point. I can't see how we wouldn't, subpoena him to speak about this was a lot of things. we'll need to speak with him about, especially being in the majority. And, some of this might be,

you know, during his presidency, but probably mostly after it. But, this is I'm going to call it the coma rule. You know, James coma is the one that has now set this rule that we can subpoena. former presidents like this, which is fine. And I believe that if Congress wants to hear from you, you need to come speak to us, no matter who you are. Right. But chasing it down with the criminal contempt, I think. that sets a new standard for Congress, which I actually think is a good standard, where we're going to. we want you to speak with us, and you're going to speak with us.

And they should know we'll use the coma rule, the coma law, as we see fit, because we have a lot to investigate. And part of the problem that Democrats had last time around. when they had power is there wasn't enough accountability done. And that was one of the issues from the Biden, GOP, DOJ, President. Biden's DOJ, DOJ is they did not hold President Trump accountable. That man should have never been able to run for president again. after staging an insurrection on this nation.

We're not going to allow that to happen again. There has to be accountability this time. We're not just going to let all this illegal stuff fly. further because we want to move on with the country. So if the Democrats win the House in the midterms. and in November, so it's, you know, coming closer, coming closer, is your goal to impeach the president? Our goal is to follow the law. And our goal is going to be to follow, follow investigations where it leads us.

So the president ready, which are the. which are the investigations that you will prioritize? If we have the honor being the majority, there's a lot of investigations. that are going to be happening. Epstein's one of them. But DHS is going to be one of the biggest priorities. Kristi Noem, who needs to be impeached as well. That will probably be one of the most important proceedings that we do. Because people have to know impeachment isn't a thing that happens.

It's a process, right? They're proceedings and, that's definitely something we'll be engaged in as well. I mean, Kristi Noem has the has to go. A lot of them have to go. A lot of them have done impeachable offenses. So. So who the others that you think have done impeachable offenses, Pam Bondi is, is probably second in line to Kristi Noem, the top impeachable offense. She did was keep the obscene files away from us far. after the date that Congress set that was voted on.

by every single Republican except one and every single Democrat. every day, that she did not release the files. after our 30 day deadline, was her breaking federal law. And so, for me that that alone is enough for her to be impeached. Kristi Noem and we can go down the list. But under her leadership and under her direction, two Americans were executed in broad daylight. Not to mention the gross violations of people's human and civil rights.

in terms of immigrants at the hands of ice. So those are top two RFK Jr, as well. I mean, what would you impeach RFK Jr for? RFK Jr? I think there's a few things, but I think where we really need to start. is the corruption at hand here. And I think there's real I think once we get into an investigation, I think we're going to be able to uncover real evidence of corruption.

And the fact that this man, when he was running for president, you know, just a few years ago, was touting some things in terms of, you know, his findings on on medicine and, and and the way, you know, in nutrition. And he's completely changed his tune on things. And we think there's financial interests there as well. And so we we need to investigate it as well. And I think RFK junior is one of them. Okay. What about Pete Hegseth? I'm going to go down the list now. You said you could go down the list. So let let's throw in a couple more.

So we've got Christina at the top of the list. Pam Bondi, RFK junior. Where would Pete Hegseth be on your list? Pete Hegseth I mean, I don't want, I don't want to like, you know, I don't, you know, what, necessarily go down the list, but like, I mean, just like off the top of my mind, we can look at some of the. the gross violations of OpSec and national security. One of the biggest ones being what happened with the sick, with the signal chat. I mean, this is something that the president.

really wanted to move past and talk about. But that could have led to it is because of the benevolence of the reporter. that that didn't lead to US troops dying. And so that in and of itself. and many and, you know, usually when somebody. at a high level of government makes a mistake like that, it is a microcosm of a lot of other things as well. So there's a lot of investigations that need to happen.

I don't believe you just say, like, let's impeach them because I don't like them. But the fact of the matter is, a lot of these members of the cabinet. for Donald Trump, are grossly incompetent, but have in many cases broken the law. And, I think, it's just something we have to look into. and it's something we have to investigate and something we have to act on. And that's going to be something I know Robert Garcia, the, you know, hopefully the future chair of oversight,

we're we're going to be ruthless in our investigations. Okay? So you're going to be ruthless in your investigations. You're one of the eight Democrats. that voted for the Clintons to be held in contempt. For me, I only voted for the Bill Clinton one about the Hillary Clinton one. Okay, okay. But didn't they both refused to appear before the committee? So why one and not the other? Because I think the they both they they both did not,

come before the committee. But I think the reasoning why the initial subpoena was sent to Hillary. Clinton was 100%, 110% political. And the fact of the matter is, that same subpoena vote. subpoenaed a lot of people and a lot of those folks. James Comber allowed them to submit what they knew through a declaration. Bill and Hillary Clinton did the same thing. I think what sets Bill, Bill and the former president, President. Clinton, apart from Secretary Clinton and a lot of the other folks,

is his proximity to Jeffrey Epstein. via photos we've seen and different things like that that I think. make his the reasoning for having him come and speak with us directly. A lot higher. But there was a lot of people we subpoenaed that. James Comer. said, give us a signed declaration about what you know, and that's okay. You don't have to come in. But for Secretary Clinton, she did the same thing. He said that wasn't enough. But the he. she doesn't have that proximity. to Jeffrey Epstein, in which I think we must have her in front of us.

And if she doesn't do it, we send her to jail. Because let's remember the criminal contempt is saying. we want the Department of Justice to send these people to jail. And obviously, Donald Trump ran on locking her up and all this stuff. And I think that's where that came from. That's why I voted no on the Hillary Clinton one. I think give us what, you know, through a written deposition, because that's what he allowed a lot of other people to do. But with President Clinton, just due to the his proximity to Epstein, a lot of the photos we've seen, we want we definitely want to hear from you in person. What do you what what what are you going to ask him?

We we want to know what he knows. What to know about the his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Look, we know that. just meeting him or knowing him or being imposed on him doesn't mean, does he? Doesn't mean like you're guilty of his crimes. But it does mean you know about him. And we want to know what you know. We want to know the things he told you. We want to know just everything as we do some investigation. Just because Congress subpoenas. you in an investigation doesn't mean we're saying you're guilty, by the way. It means you're.

you means we're saying. you have information that we want to help us in an investigation. And when we call you. and we say we want you to come in front of us and that you're you're. so close to the investigation that we need you to speak with us. You need to come. And that's why I originally voted yes. And I got to tell you that a few about a week after that vote went through, Bill Clinton sent an offer to James Comey that said, okay, I'll do the transcript. You can bring everyone from the committee. And he essentially said, yes, that everything Komar wanted. And because President Clinton said that I was going to vote no on the floor.

on the criminal contempt because he is he is satisfied everything that we wanted. But then James Comer move the goalposts and said, well, now I want it filmed. So, you know, it was just like continuing to move the goalpost, which shows for him it's entirely political, which is just horrible because something that we promised the survivors. when we spent hours with them in, in rooms, listening to them and saying, we promised the country is this isn't about politics. It doesn't matter if you're Democrat or Republican.

We're going to follow this till the end. And obviously for James Comer, it is about politics from this, about. nothing else but for us it's about justice for the survivors and everybody. So but it's all been sorted. We're going we're going to hear from them. I know at least Secretary Clinton has said. she wants to do it publicly in a public hearing. I'm all for that. I don't know why comer would be against that unless he has something to hide. So we'll see where this leads. But, again, just because we subpoena you doesn't mean we're saying you're guilty. It means we're saying we we want the information. that, you know, so we can, continue our investigation.

And then do you think that President Trump would ever be subpoenaed. while the Democrats are in the minority? No, I don't see that happening. Because, Republicans, I don't think, have the spine for that. In fact, we tried to add a subpoena on when they moved this Bill Clinton one. We did an amendment to add Pam Bondi because if anyone should be held. in criminal contempt, it should really be Pam Bondi. She has not come to our committee to speak about this at all.

She hasn't been our committee at all throughout this entire Congress. And she's the one that was really directly violating the law. without releasing obscene files. So she was so sure the AG in Florida, while Jeffrey Epstein was doing a lot of his crimes. Right? Yeah. Possibly because it was through a us, a US attorney, that the sweetheart deal went through and obviously we did a deposition. Alex Acosta so obviously, being the AG, I mean, there's she could know a lot. She might not, you know, depends. Just because it was a federal deal that he received.

and not one to the state, however, because it was a US attorney, not a state attorney. However, we need to she needs to be held in contempt. because she broke the law, not releasing the files on the timeline we set. And that and I think that's like the that's the thing. like right in front of us that we that we need to deal with. So and they said no to that. So if they're going to say no on Pam Bondi. who is breaking the law that they voted yes on, they would never do Donald Trump.

I mean, they they would never subpoena Donald Trump or anyone in his family. or anything like that. To play devil's advocate, we've heard Todd Blanch say that, you know, hundreds of agents were working full time. on the Epstein files, redacting them, reading them. They did eventually release 3 million of them. Yes. It was a few weeks later than technically they should have done. But I can understand that the sheer volume of Epstein files meant.

that it might not have been responsible to release them before then. Is there an argument that that actually. it feels very technical to go after Pam Bondi for that? Because the Epstein files are now out. Not all the Epstein files are out. And in fact, the day that they released them, they made a statement saying they weren't. going to release the loads of files they still have. They were making argument about redactions and things like that.

So we got to be clear. They're not allow number two. The only types of redactions we approved in our law had to do with Vict, with victims and survivors. There was much more redactions in that they decided to redact essentially people. that they thought would be harmed politically. And friends of Donald Trump. They said this publicly. Number three, it's not a technical thing. It's the law. So. Right. It's not technically, it should have been three weeks before. It's by the law. It should have been three weeks before we gave them a month.

We gave them 30 days. And then the last thing is Pam Bondi is that she herself paraded. in the first two weeks of her administration, giving these fake Epstein. five x to Epstein file binders. to right wing influencers. She's the one that said she had the files on her desk for over a year. So to to then now have this new argument that they're trying that. Well, it's so many files. We had to go through all of them. We couldn't do it in a month. She's the one that said. she had them for a year on her desk and didn't do a damn thing about it.

when she found out that Donald Trump's name was in them. And this isn't even conjecture. This is stuff all these people have said publicly, because part of their incompetence is they never talked to each other. So one person says one thing and the other person says the other thing. We put two and two together, and we figure out. we've been getting lied to the whole time. And this is part of the frustration that even a lot of Republicans. had with the release of these files. So. it, it doesn't hold water for me. The you know what they're saying? Well, let me let me give you an example.

When we get these dumps, let's say we get a 40,000 paid for it. We get 40,000 pages right now, the minority, the Democrats and oversight. We have half the staff. They will be locked in a room in an office going through these files, figuring out what we should release to the public. And because of transparency, redacting victims. And they will do this within 24 hours to two days. So I'm just saying, like they're, you know, it's B.S., it's. okay, at least straight up I know it's B.S.

and if you're in the majority when the midterms happened, Pam Bondi and Kristi Noem will be at the top of the list for impeachment. All right. So. in terms of Democratic leadership, who would your candidate now be for president. in 2028? I don't really have a name. I have a I have some criteria though. Okay. What's your criteria? You know, the thing I'm looking for, number one, is I think we need a president.

who's going to be unafraid to, number one, seek the accountability that is needed for the people in government. that have broken the law. We spoke about this a little at the beginning of the interview. We can't have someone who's going to say, we're not gonna. seek accountability because we need to move on as a nation. We need to move on because essentially what will happen is we don't hold the law. breakers in the top leaders of this regime accountable for breaking the law. and essentially circumventing the Constitution.

It will happen again because there was no accountability for it. So that's one big piece of it. The other big piece is someone who understands. the wealth inequality in this country. The crisis that were in this country, and they're saying that it's going to take. big ideas and big solutions to get them through. on an aggressive timeline, to show people that government works for them. I for me, moving towards a single payer system. and ensuring that everybody has health care in this country.

is one of the most important things that we have to do, especially with the new president. Given how Republicans have just completely destroyed. the health care system that was already destroyed before, we can't have somebody who thinks that little clips around. the edges are going to save this country and put us in a good position. So the question is, are you a presidential candidate. that believes that we're going to rebuild it to what it was before? And that's enough and that's that's not meeting my criteria? Or do you believe that there's an opportunity here. where we get to build it.

in a way. that's much better than it was, in a way that actually works for working people? So who is answering that criteria right now? The people that are clearly running, who is is speaking to that criteria. I have no I have no names for you because the fact of the matter is, how is that possible? You must be looking at everybody and thinking, who's. going to lead your party out? I mean, wellness, I mean, I mean, I look at people and say, okay, that person gave a good speech, okay? That person's being aggressive and I like that.

But the fact of the matter is have I mean, how is it possible? Have you seen any of these folks release the policy that they're going to run on? No, because we're in a shadow primary, which means people are more kind of. showing the way they speak about an issue, the way that they frame an issue. And that's really important. I just want to sit here and give you names when I haven't seen. what the people will be running on, which could be a lot different. than what they've traditionally run on now, I guess, I guess. that I'm, I'm less sanguine than you are about what.

people vote for and, and how they vote and why they vote. And I think they vote for the person, not the policies. And I think they vote for people who have energy. and they think are going to stand up for them. Yes, but you asked who I. who I was going to support. But you are Congressman. His party is in the wilderness. You're deeply frustrated. This is your second term still in opposition. How do you who do you look to. to lead your party to the next level?

And I understand they have criteria that you need them to meet. But in terms of personalities, is there not anybody that you feel. enthusiastic about? I mean, I there's a lot of people I feel enthusiastic about. I just I'm not sure I want to frame it and like people I know will be. or people support for president. Right. But there's a lot of people that are doing good work that I'm enthusiastic about. There's a lot of great people in the house. I mean, we have people like Greg Casar, who's the, who's a trailer progressive Caucus.

We have Alexandria. Ocasio-Cortez, who's inspiring people across the entire country. And really, I think giving a great message on why all this stuff. is happening right now in our country and how it enriches the billionaires. You have people. I brought her up some early Delhi Ramirez. We have governors that are fighting back in different ways all across the country. So I, you know, you have people in the Senate that are, you know, figuring out how can we fight back and actually have a fighting chance here. Chris Van Hollen, Chris Murphy,

Elizabeth Warren, of course, Bernie Sanders, Raphael Warnock, you know, there's people who are doing great work that I think, you know, when people ask me, who do you think the leader is? Part of what sets our party a little apart from the Republican Party. is we have many leaders right now, but I'm fully aware that, like, it's not. people don't walk into a booth and say, what's the policy? What's the where are they at? On the ideological spectrum? People vote with their heart. And I and I recognize that. But a big part of it is people have to see themselves seen in the story.

And part of the story is like the solutions, like on what they're going to run on. And I've just I've seen so many candidates who are one way and then they run. for president and their tune changes, either better or for worse. So we'll kind of have to see where that goes. But there's a lot of great people, you know, everyone we're talking about, there's a lot of good people out there. You're the youngest member in the House of Congress. You were. How old were you when you were like 26, 25, 25 when you were elected? Congratulations. An incredible achievement.

You have in your party, and you referenced Elizabeth Warren, and you referenced. Bernie Sanders, who's technically an independent who are both in their 70s. You have the Democratic establishment getting behind Janet. Mills, the governor of Maine, who's been a perfectly good governor. But if she were to get the Senate seat, which they're backing her for, she would be 78 when she comes into the Senate. So 84 when she left. She's saying, I'm not Joe Biden, which seems a very strange thing to say.

Yeah. Should there be a term limit? Should there be a cast off at this point. term? Oh yeah, there should definitely be term limits. I think it actually cuts both ways. And what I mean by this is. there should be term limits because, yeah, people get to a certain place. in their life, certain age where it it makes sense to pass the baton. I don't believe in setting an age limit because that age might be different. for everyone. People are different, you know, have different cognitive abilities at different ages. I'm not sure how to you, but then how do you say to someone,

I'm sorry, you're too old? I mean, we had Dianne Feinstein die in office when it felt. very clear that she didn't even understand quite basic questions being answered. We had the president, the flaming out in the middle of a debate. In a catastrophic debate for him. Isn't it easier to have an age cut off so you don't have to judge. people's mental capacity? I think having term limits. will solve 90% of these problems that we're talking about,

but it wouldn't have solved. It wouldn't have solved the problem for President Biden. Sure. And when I saw the problem for President Biden. But I mean, that that, that issue, obviously he ended up not running again. And, you know, there was discussions in the party on that. But I just hesitate to add an age limit. Because I just think the best thing we can do, our term limits at this point. But but what I also wanted to talk about. is it also helps on the other end, because it's not just about having people.

that are too old to be in Congress, but it's also or elected office. But it's also about people being in the place for too long. And I think that's a big problem, too. For instance, I enter Congress at the age of 25 years old. If if I had the honor of being elected by my constituents. as many times as I as I want to run, if I had that honor. Conceivably a lot of my colleagues are 75 years old. I could be in the United States Congress for 50 years.

Yeah. I mean, it's the oldest nursing home. It's been referred to as the oldest nursing home. and or the nicest nursing home, right, in America. Well, yeah. And what I mean, but and what I'm trying to bring up, too, is the fact that. But I came in young. and because I've come in so young, I could be in for a long time, longer. than, you know, a lot of the people have been there for a while that everyone complains about. Most of them I've been in for 30 years. I'm saying I could be in for 50 years if my constituents elected me.

No one should be representing the same district for 50 years, 40 years, 30 years, etc.. All right, so how many how many terms are you? Are you willing to give yourself before it's time to step aside? If we want to get really wonky about it? Actually what I think needs I, I don't know the exact number and I think. like, I know you get a feeling, Congressman, you know, you're waffling. Come on. You must have thoughts about this. No, I'm not waffling. I'm just telling you, like straight up I don't have the number for you.

And I'm curious on, you know what, I want to have more debates and discussion. with people to figure out the number, but I actually think that we should have term. limits, that I think the term length of a United States Congress. person should actually be four years and not two years, I think. I think that should be aligned with almost every other elected office. because and it should be staggered. Half a Congress is up one year, half a Congress is up the other year. Because part of what happens is I think, well, number one, because of gerrymandering, we're getting to the system.

where all of Congress changes every two years. And because we have so many. gerrymandered districts that it's going to be very slim margins, and it's always going to be that way. And I just think we need to not add the whole institution up at the same time. But other years. And then I also believe because we have all these super PACs, dark. money, billionaire money and all this, essentially what happens is. you get in for a year, you focus on your job, then you have to spend the whole of the year raising money. because of this horrible system that we're in.

And you don't get to spend the whole time solely focused on legislating. And I feel like four year terms will actually yield better legislators. that are more focused on their constituents versus. trying to get the job back so they can finish their bills and this and that. So my proposal is make it four year terms like we do. for mayors and other positions, but add the term limits. What should those be? I don't know, maybe if you have four year terms, maybe you can only serve.

four terms, or maybe it's maybe it's less than that. You know, this is me just kind of spitballing here. But, but I do believe that there should be term limits. But I also think the term should be a little longer. The Senate. I mean, we could have arguments on whether the Senate should really exist, but, there's there's reason to believe why they should have term. limits and their term should actually be four years instead of six. Oh, very provocative, very provocative. We just have such a different system than what our.

When the founders created it. That it just wasn't. It's just a different. We live in a different time. And I just think we have to keep things. I mean, the house should be a lot bigger, too, by the way. We need to add a lot more members of the House. So either way. All right. So I was going to ask you. a final question, which I asked of Jasmine Crockett, and I asked James Talarico, how do you date when you are a congressperson? How do you how do you have any kind of quiet private life?

Well, you know, on the quiet private life part, I'll say, I think. you don't get to have as much of a private life, obviously, like, you know, when you walk around the district, people know who you are. It's hard to go to, you know, you go to a bar, you know, people are going to know who you are. But I don't know, you know, for me, I think find the things that you love and and find time to do them. I mean, I don't know, you can see behind me, I have my vibraphone, I have my thimble drums, and everything's set up. But you're a musician in your spare time? Yeah, I'm a musician.

I'm a musician. And that's what I studied in school. And and of, I find time to go to jams and go to concerts and, go to film festivals and things like that to be able to enjoy art, because that's really the thing I do. that's like, that's the one thing I do to feed my soul. But the other thing is self preservation isn't. And self-care isn't just about like being on the beach. with the cucumbers on your eyes, even though that's nice. But it's also about finding ways to incorporate. the things you love in the work that you do.

And when you do that, it gives you a lot more longevity. And so, you know, that's part of the reason why. I do a lot of legislation on music and arts and that kind of work, because I think it's important and I love it. That's why, you know, when we do Orlando Pride, I don't just sit on a convertible and wave my hand like, we, we, we rent a flatbed semi-truck, and I wake up at 6 a.m. with my best friends that I used to be in a band with, and we build a stage on it. and we play music in the parade and we make it a concert.

Right? And we I just find ways to incorporate those things that I love in the work. that I do. And that's like another way that, you know, I'm able to do the work. for a longer period of time, but it's hard to have like a quiet, you know, kind of that quiet personal life. In many ways. You have sacrificed a lot of that. What that is for, you know, for people. But there's still ways you can figure out how to do it. And to truth be told, I'm still figuring it out. I don't have it all together. And honestly, my first term I didn't do a good job.

I like really burnt myself out because I felt like coming in. As the youngest member of Congress, I needed to defy the expectations, and. in doing that, I really burnt myself out and didn't really take much time. If I don't really take much time off at all the first two years, I'm. doing a better job of taking care of myself this term. But it's all the same thing because you look around and you say, I can't take a day off. Like, you know, we are living under fascism. right now, an authoritarian regime, but also and we know this to be true.

throughout so many struggles is even in the toughest moments for our people. You do have to, you know, preserve yourself, because if you don't, you will burn out and you won't be able to help anybody. And I think it's important for us in a first to keep that in mind. So young and yet so wise. Congressman Frost, thank you so much for joining us. I hope we can come back to you. You've sent us a full of points of view and also would love to talk to you. more about the Epstein files.

And, especially when the the Clintons appear. Yeah. And that'll be that'll be just in a few weeks here. And, so hopefully we'll have more information. I'm just from them, but we have a lot of outstanding subpoenas, and we're supposed to receive more documents from the estate, more documents from the banks. Like I said, this is this will be going on for a bit because this is so deep. A lot of people don't realize how big this is, how many governments, how many people are involved in it. It was a massive failure,

of our system that failed these women and failed our country. But we're we're really going to get to the bottom of it. So, but thanks for having me on those. Great to be on. So there you have it. The youngest congressman in the House, very diplomatic. I thought he refused to be drawn on who he thought would be a good national leader. for the Democratic Party, but he seems very intent on not doing what. President Obama did when he said. the past is in the past, where moving forward, he feels adamant.

that Kristi Noem, Pam Bondi, Pete Hex. and RFK junior should be impeached the moment. the House of Representatives is back in Democratic hands. Well, right. And tell us what you think. Would love to know what you think of the congressman. Just as a comment on YouTube. Don't forget to subscribe to The Daily Beast, the channel, become a Beast Tier member. And also feel free to sign up for the Daily Beast itself,

where we keep you up to date. with the latest madness that our president is subjecting us all to. Republicans and Democrats alike. As always, please like this video and share it with your friends and leave us a comment. We love reading the comments. I try and answer as many as I can, and seeing the Daily Beast. community grow on YouTube has been really gratifying. So with that in mind, I've got a favor to ask.

Actually, can you take a moment to fill out our audience survey? You'll find it in the description below, and we'll pin it as the top comments, too. We really just want to know more about you so we can help grow the Daily Beast. YouTube community and give you more content, more extra value. It'll take two minutes to fill in and we really appreciate it. So the good news is we have so many beast tier members now. There are too many names to read out and we really appreciate your support.

Thanks to our production team, Devin, Roger Reno, Ryan Murray, Rachel Parsa, Heather Pizarro, Neil House.