Joe Rogan Experience #2526 - JD Vance

Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out. >> The Joe Rogan Experience. >> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY. NIGHT. All day. >> U. So, the last time we talked [music]. uh last time I saw you, we were at a. cage fight at the White House. >> That's right. That's [laughter]. That's. >> one of the craziest experiences of my. life. It must have been one of the. craziest experiences of your life. >> Oh, yeah. It took me like 2 weeks. afterwards to recover just to like go,

did that actually happen? That seems It. seems so insane. >> Okay. The most insane part of it, which. I guess was was before you got there to. to me at least, is you like you come. into work every day in the White House, right? You you know, I have an office in. the West Wing. There's the Oval Office. in the West Wing. And you look out the. window and as this like eightstory. complex was growing up, it was the it. was just the most unbelievable thing. I. think it's like the south lawn of the. White House, but you've got the eighth. wonder of the world [laughter] being.

built up around it. And every day I'd. look at it and be like, it would take me. a couple seconds to be like, "What the. hell is going on?" And I like, "Oh yeah, it's UFC. It's UF UFC coming in a couple. weeks.". >> The whole thing was surreal. First of. all, it was crazy that the weather just. went around us. >> Like there was a real moment where the. fights would have been postponed until. 10:30 p.m. to start. >> Correct. And uh last minute the storm. just diverted. >> That's right. Well, and uh you know this.

this uh this book that I have that I'm I. guess we'll talk about a little bit, but. the book tour started the next day. So I. was flying to New York the next day to. talk about it. And all I could think. about is every time we got the update. from White House weather, oh it might. not start until 10:30. I was thinking to. myself, "Holy that means I'm going. to go to bed at like 4:00 a.m. I'm going. to look like a total crazy person when I. try [laughter] to go talk about go talk. about this book." But yeah, it it it. amazingly it did work out. Honestly, it. actually helped a little bit because, as. you know, it was hot as hell out there.

and it was super humid, you know, mid. June in in in DC. And I think the. weather actually helped cool it down a. little bit because by about 10:00 or so, I was not thinking it's hot as hell out. here anymore. >> Yeah, it wasn't too bad. But I talked to. Justin Gatey about it and he said it was. a problem when he was fighting. He said. the air was very thick. Okay. >> Like it like right after the first. round, he was like, "Boy, >> like this is rough." Cuz that hot humid. air and you know it's.

>> Yeah. Yeah. No, it's it's it's fine. walking around. >> It's it's I mean it's okay walking. around. It still feels it is a swamp, right? That's why people call it the. swamp. So, you know, that's obviously. June 14th. That's the president. >> That's not why they call it the swamp. [laughter]. >> That's one of the reasons why they call. it the swamp. >> They call it the swamp. >> They call it swamp because of my. colleagues, too. >> Cuz it's filled with [laughter] mud and. water and gunk and and swamp. monsters. >> Oh, man. So, that's June 14th. So, it's. the president's birthday. That's also. was that was my 12th wedding. anniversary. >> Oh, wow. and uh my wife. So that's.

that's the one thing like if somebody. runs in here, it's because my wife's. going into labor cuz she's like 39 weeks. pregnant. But uh I remember we go out to. dinner like right before the UFC fight. and we're of course checking the weather. report to figure out what's going on. And you know, my wife normally likes to. come to the cool stuff of being vice. president. That was the one where she. was like, "It's hot. I'm super pregnant. and I'm not going to sit sit out there. for six hours." So. >> yeah, I couldn't imagine [laughter]. Also, it was just there was so much.

chaos and and the potential for real. chaos was always there. First of all, you have the Ellipse. So, the Ellipse. has what 85,000. people outside. >> and for people that watching at home. like we could hear them like when the. fights when when something would happen. >> in like kind of a delayed way, right? >> You hear the cheers from the people that. were near. So, it was like 3,000 plus. people tightly close to the octagon and. then you had 85,000 people in the Yeah.

>> Yeah. >> in the background. It was very eerie. >> Yeah. >> I actually loved that. Like I loved the. delay reaction to where you know. somebody get a good punch in or you know. you get a takedown and then it was. almost like the wave, right? Cuz there. was the initial center of it and then. the people outside of it. >> It was pretty sick. >> It was pretty sick. It was very. [laughter] cool. I think Dana said not. once in a lifetime or not once in a. generation or once in a lifetime. experience. >> Yeah. I mean, it's once ever. Yeah. I. don't see any other president. I mean,

if you become president, you're not. going to do that, [laughter] right? >> Uh I don't know, man. >> It's I wouldn't I didn't want to do it. >> Very cool. Get it over with. Do it once. >> It was the only time in the history of. the sport where there's been seven. stoppages. Seven Seven knockouts. Like. every single fight was a knockout. >> I didn't realize that. >> Yeah. Every single fight. Okay. >> But the thing is like we've had seven. knockouts in a card. I think this last. weekend we had 10 10 stoppages. >> But um. >> that was different because it was like.

14 fights. That's right. >> This is all fights. Every single fight. was a knockout. >> So the last fight. When did you realize. that was over. >> with Connor? >> Yeah. >> Um when he fell down the second time I. was like this is not good. F the first. time I thought he just slipped. It's. hard to tell. It's wild. It's in the. moment. I thought he slipped and then. when he got up and he threw a kick. again, I'm like, "Oh, I don't like how. his leg just gave out." That didn't seem. like I'm still hoping he's just. slipping. >> Yeah. >> I'm hoping he's just freaking out cuz he.

hasn't been in the octagon in 5 years. >> And then he started moving around and he. he like grabbed his knee and buckled. >> Okay. >> And there was some conversation that. Yeah. There was some conversation going. on between him and Max Holloway. And I. was like, >> you know, Max is saying he can't fight. Like something's wrong. and he's saying, "Fight me." He's like, "Get up." And so. he lets him up and then his his knee. buckles. Then the referee stops the. fight. >> Okay. Yeah. Yeah. There it always So so. the the very I think it was the very. last fight where the the ref tried to.

call it at the end of the third round. and then because he was he was saying. that there was a concussion issue. I. mean I couldn't tell what was going on. >> This the Ilia Tapora fight, the Justin. Gate fight at the White House. >> The Taporio Justin fight. >> He couldn't see. >> Okay. >> He was saying he couldn't see. Well, something was wrong with his right eye. >> Well, I mean it looks like his whole. face was puffed up, so he couldn't see. anything, but Okay. So, I thought it was. a concussion thing, but it was it was. because of his vision. >> No, they never got they I mean, the. concussion thing would only be if. someone had been battered. There's a lot.

of times where fighters are fighting. with concussions. >> Yeah, it happens all the time. You get. dropped in the first round, you probably. have a concussion. You get back up, you. keep fighting, you're fighting on. instincts. There's been many times where. fighters wake up in like the fourth. round. >> and they've fought three rounds and they. don't remember it at all. >> God, that's pretty crazy. >> Not the best way to make a living. [laughter]. >> Not the best way to make a living, man. Yeah. No. So, we saw Gachi um at the. White House a couple of weeks ago and I. asked him, I was like, "So, are you done.

fighting?" And he kind of hesitated a. little bit and then I think it was his. mom was in the Oval Office with her. She's like, "Yes." [laughter]. >> Yeah. But, you know, if they offer him. some life-changing money for one more. fight after that performance, I have a. feeling he'll take it. >> Like, what is what could he fetch for. his next fight? Like 50 more? >> It's a good question. You know, I don't. know what his contract is. I don't know. how it works. I don't know what the most. anyone's ever I try not to pay attention. to that stuff.

>> because I'm not on the business end of. the sport. >> It kind of color your perception a. little bit. >> It can. And it's also it's I mean I want. them to get paid the most amount. possible. That's my perspective. Yeah. >> But what I'm my job is just to analyze. and to see what's going on and to. commentate and try to give color and. life to what's happening inside the. octagon. And I don't I try not to dwell. too much on the money. I just want them. to get paid a lot. Yeah. >> I want them to be able to retire and. never have to do anything ever again.

>> Sure. >> I don't know if Justin could do that. What's crazy about it to me is just how. much the sport has replaced boxing and. like there's still obviously boxing is. still a big deal and fighters still get. paid a lot of money but like I remember. when I was I don't know in high school I. feel like people would get really. excited about the big heavyweight. heavyweight title bout. Now it's the UFC. thing. >> So culturally it's like UFC has taken. over boxing and I don't I mean I don't.

know how or why that happened. Like I. don't know if it's just good marketing. or if it's just the fights are so much. more real and intense. Like I but it's. it is a crazy shift that's happened in. 20 years. >> Well, I've had some I had some friends. this past weekend that manage fighters. My friend Josh Dubin and a few other. friends that actually manage boxers come. to the UFC and they were all like, "Oh. my god, this is so much better than a. boxing promotion." Because you c all the. fights are exciting. With boxing, most. people are just there for the main. event. >> And a lot of people don't even stroll in. until like 15 minutes before the main.

event. Sure. >> Like all the famous people that sit in. the front row. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Uh in the UFC, that place is packed for, >> you know, five, six, seven fights in. >> Yeah. >> You know, and there's 14 fights in the. night and all of them are amazing. It's. like in the beginning it's usually like. half full. >> depending on where you are. If you're in. a place like Salt Lake City, it's pretty. packed like right away because they only. get like one event every year or. >> so. >> But um it's just a more exciting sport. There's more ways to win. It's more.

dynamic. More things happen. >> and there's more stars. There's so many. stars in the UFC. >> Yeah. So I'd never seen a fight live. before. Like I've watched them on TV, but I'd never been there live. So kind. of crazy that it's literally in the. south lawn of the White House. But the. thing that I found completely shocking. about it was like I would think those. those like arm bar takedowns are just. done. Like that's it. You're over. But. there were a couple of times where. somebody had another person's arm and. >> Yeah, that was Josh Hoit and Derrick.

Lewis. >> Bless you. >> Um and it's like holy. >> Yeah, he. >> you're going to have your arm broken off. and yet he didn't. >> He wasn't doing it right. >> Okay. [laughter] Josh Hok is a great. wrestler and he's an excellent fighter, but he's not really a submission. specialist. I mean, he did get the arm. bar, but he didn't do it right. Okay. >> He was basically like pulling on. You. have to elevate your hips and you have. to create space so that the arm is. bending back this way. His arm is. essentially flat to his chest, which is.

not what you want. What you want is. >> a back arch like this where you see like. how it is right there. Yeah. Yeah. >> So, what he wants to do here, what he. should do instead of having his hips. down, his knees up, what you're supposed. to do is heavy leg curls with the leg. and elevate the hips up and pull it way. back. So, he'd almost be bridging it. He. would be on the top of his shoulders and. bridging and then he would have broken. his arm. The other option is you pull it. off to the side like this. >> Yeah. >> And you put it to the side of your hip.

and you can break it that way. >> Okay. >> But it's just bad technique. >> Okay. So, watching it. No offense, Josh. >> Yeah. Yeah. Watching it, I didn't. realize that. I just could not believe. that dude held out for like 30 seconds. with his. >> Was that more shocking or when he said. Michelle Obama is a man? [laughter]. Which one was more shocking? >> Uh, definitely the armbar part. Man, [laughter] I I work in politics. People. say crazy stuff all the time. >> Well, he says that every fight, does he? >> Yeah. Yeah, he said it. He said that the. last time I interviewed him.

>> Oh, man. Well, it's. >> He's like a pro wrestling character. People lost their minds about it. >> I know. >> Lost their minds about it to the point. where again I had the view either the. next day or the day after to sort of. promote this book. >> That must be fun. >> It was crazy. It was harder than any. anything I've done in politics. But the. the the to the point where all of my. comm's people, the thing they were most. worried about was they're going to ask. you about Michelle Obama being called a. man. Like what what are you [laughter].

like what are you going to say about it? And I was like, what an amped up fighter. told a joke after a fight. Said. something after a fight and that's. actually national news. I'm still. surprised. I've been in politics now for. three or four years. I'm still shocked. the that people get really fired up. about. >> Well, I kind of understand it because. it's at the White House. First of all, a. cage fight at the White House is crazy. already. I mean, if he said Michelle. Obama's a man at the T-Mobile Arena in. Vegas, it's like, okay, >> less of a story. He what he is is he's a. very good fighter first of all and but.

sometimes that's not enough to get. attention and so what Josh has done is. created this persona like this pro. wrestling bad guy persona when you talk. to him offstage he's like very normal. very smart guy. >> it's just like he's decided like look I. want to maximize the amount of eyeballs. that see me and I'm going to create this. crazy person he comes out to the Hulk. Hogan song I'm a real American. who has sunglasses on, American flag. band. It's, you know, he's.

>> I mean, I love I love the I love the. presentation, but again, I like. >> not the best thing to say at the White. House. Michelle Obama's a man is not the. best thing to say. >> Fair, but the reaction to it to me was. still totally disproportionate. >> Yeah, of course. >> People say, Dude, people say stuff all. the time. And what I Okay, I I live I I. I work in a business where obviously. people make life decision, life and. death decisions all the time. And I'm. always a little bit caught off guard by.

the culture that just overreacts when. clearly the thing what that Josh is. trying to get is the overreaction in the. first place, right? >> So you give him exactly what he wants. and like the worst you could say is, "Oh, that was an offensive comment." And. you get on with the rest of your life. Like that's the worst that you could. say. the people who really flip out. about it and kind of lose their minds. I. just I don't understand that. >> Well, first of all, I think a lot of it. is there is an economy that is. essentially based on getting reactions.

>> Correct. >> And there's a lot of people that are. just, for a lack of a better term, they're they're not real. They're. they're reactions are performative. Like. a lot of what they're doing is just. trying to trying to comment on things. and get clicks and likes and views. And. social media has ruined discourse in a. lot of ways because people. >> it has. >> people are not having like real. conversations about things. is they're. reacting to things on Instagram and.

Twitter. >> and you know they're just they they look. at an opportunity like that like oh I. found a gold nugget. >> they're like this is going to give me. money or this is going to give me. attention this is going to give oh I. can't wait to have a take on that. >> That's exactly right. So but okay so my. response to that is so many things is. like oh he was being funny he was being. outrageous and I just move on with my. life. What I find very interesting is. the people who say, you know, oh, that. was a joke. Like when when Kill Tony,

you remember he told like the joke heard. around the world in Madison Square. Garden during the 2024 election. >> I remember getting into an argument with. somebody about this and I may have even. been like in an interview, but. >> I don't remember. It could have been. private, too. Anyway, I I'm like, he. told a joke and then the person's. response is, well, it's not a very funny. joke. And my response to that is, you. know what happens when somebody tells me. a joke that's not funny? I don't laugh. and then I move on with my life. This. whole industry around outrage,

>> especially getting outraged around. humor, I think is actually really. hurting the country. >> Well, in that case, first of all, I told. Tony a long time ago that joke was going. to get him stabbed. I really did. He. even jokes around about it on stage. He. talks about me telling him, "That's the. one, dude. That's the one's going to get. you stabbed." Any good joke at least is. going to run you some risk of getting. >> well certainly a a racial joke and that. joke being about Puerto Rico. By the. way, no one takes a joke better than.

Puerto Ricans. Puerto Ricans are some of. the best people at telling jokes. Like. there it is a culture of joking and and. around with each other and. talking Like. >> they're great at it. So like. >> some Puerto Rican guys in the Marine. Corps, man. That's absolutely true. >> They love him still, you know, like even. after that joke. What? So you you you. advised him not to tell that joke. >> Well, I was kind of half joking. You. know, Tony that's what Tony does. You. know what? By I just said that's the one. that's going to get you stabbed. But I. mean that's what Tony does. Tony is like.

the Josh Hokit of comedy. Like he but. very talented. You know, he's a really. good he's a roaster. >> He's like roasting is is his specialty, but it's also like he's trying to ruffle. people's feathers. That's what he wants. to do. He wants to piss people off. That's he likes being a pro wrestling. heel. He always he's a huge pro. wrestling fan. >> Well, so well he so Tony I like I'm a. huge fan of his comedy. I've only you. know met him a couple times. I don't. know him particularly well but he's. actually like you know more political I.

would say than most comedians. >> Do you think that's fair? Okay. >> So um. >> well very supportive of like Trump. >> like he's on the Republican team. He's. on their 100%. That's because he's. experienced so many loony leftwing. people in California and that's why he. had to move. >> Well, somebody sent me a clip. I think. it was Shane Gillis at a roast where the. the joke was they were roasting Tony and. they're like, Tony Hinchcliffe is the.

only dude who would be excited if JD. Vance was here. [laughter]. And I was like, one, that's a very good. joke. And number two, I feel like I had. made it. Like there have been a few. moments where I feel like I've made it. When. >> you're the vice president of the United. States, I think you made it. >> When when South Park spoofed me, I felt. it more than when I got it sworn in as. vice president of the United States. >> That's hilarious. That's very funny. This episode is brought to you by the. farmer's dog. Here's a fun fact. Research shows that dogs who maintain a.

healthy weight can live up to two and a. half years longer on average than dogs. who are overweight. Isn't that wild and. also kind of obvious at the same time? So, why is feeding vague scoops of. ultrarocessed kibble still the status. quo for most dog owners? Healthy. alternatives exist, and trust me, I. know. I buy one, the Farmer's Dog. I use. it for both my dogs. They love it. They. eat it up quick. It smells good to them. It smells good to me. It's human grade. food. The Farmer's Dog makes fresh food.

for dogs, and my dogs love it. Their. recipes are made with real meat and. fresh vegetables that are gently cooked. to retain vital nutrients. They also. portion out the meals to your dog's. nutritional needs, which helps avoid. overfeeding and makes weight management. easier. And isn't getting more time with. our four-legged best friends something. every dog owner wants? The answer to. that is yes, obviously. So try the. farmer's dog today and get 50% off your.

first box of fresh, healthy food. Plus, get free shipping. Just go to the. farmersdog.com/rogan. This offer is for new customers only. >> Yeah. Tony is uh I mean that's his style. like like he loves like being the heel. >> Get a kick out of it. Oh yeah. Oh yeah. He's one of the first people that moved. out here with me. >> Okay. >> Yeah. I mean we've been here for six. years now. >> Yeah. And every time we go back to. California, we're like, "We were right.". >> Yeah, absolutely. >> We were right. It's falling apart. It.

keeps going further and further down the. toilet. >> Well, how do how do you feel like Austin. is going? Cuz the criticism of Austin, call it five or six years ago, is that. all the like it's a cool town. It's got. its own unique culture. It's Texas, but. it's also its own thing. But that all of. the blue sters moving in, we're going to. like totally change the politics and the. culture of Austin. I actually don't. think that's happened. >> I think the blue sters that moved here. moved here because they recognized that.

wherever they were living was not. tenable. Yeah, it was falling apart. And. all of these places like New York and. really California, like especially Los. Angeles and San Francisco, they're. falling apart. >> And I have a bunch of friends that are. stuck there that can't move. Like maybe. they have family there or maybe they. have a business there. Y. >> and they hate it. And then I. have a bunch of people that are trying. to move but they can't sell their house. >> Like it's nuts there, man. I don't think.

people first of all you get gas lit by. Gavin Newsome. I mean he's just. gaslighting everybody about how well, you know, oh the GDP of like the fifth. largest country in the world. That's. what California is. >> It's like dude, >> hey bro, it was like that before you. were the governor. >> Yeah, exactly. Also, how much does a. U-Haul cost if you're leaving. California? And how much does it cost if. you're going in California? Because. that's the real measure of whether a. state's doing well. >> Yeah. The state has more people moving. out than moving in. And that has never.

happened before. Correct. California's. when I moved there in 1994 until I left, it was always every year traffic got. worse. Every year more people moved. there. Every year. And. >> I loved it. I loved it. I loved it. From. the time I moved there, I was like, "This place is great. It's warm all the. time. The weather's fantastic. There's. [clears throat] so much cool stuff to. do. The people are great. >> Yeah. >> And then politics ruined it. >> That's right. So, my wife's from. Southern California, San Diego, and so. we spent a fair amount of time there. And I I just, man, I still feel a.

certain sense of like heartbreak over. LA. Oh, >> because every time I'm in LA, you can. see why this was like the. quintessentially American city. The. architecture is beautiful. It's got its. own vibe going. Like you said, the. weather is amazing. And then you drive. through Skid Row and you're like, how. could any state or any city let this. happen? >> Skidro is now 55 blocks. It was 50 blocks just like a year or two. ago. >> Okay. So my my first experience with.

Skidro was so Usha used to work at this. like very fancy litigation firm in in. Southern California. Um you before she. was second lady, she was a corporate. litigator. So, there's a Christmas party. in downtown LA and you get these. instructions from her firm and they're. like this really convoluted way of this. is how you have to get to this Christmas. party. And I'm like, why do I have to. follow these direct directions? Why. don't I just put it in Google Maps, right? This is like five or six, seven. years ago. So, we realized that the.

reason why they gave you these. convoluted directions was so that you. could avoid Skid Row at night. And so. you get to this party, you drive through. Skidro if you follow Google Maps's. directions. You get there and it's like. this beautiful facility with like fancy. food and fancy wine and then there are. armed guards outside of it and these. gigantic walls. And I realized when I. was there, you know what this reminds me. of? This reminds me of going to the US. embassy in Porta Prince, Haiti. like.

super security, crazy wealth and. privilege and status on the inside and. squalor and misery on the outside. Like. it's the first time I'd ever thought. America, like this part of America is. actually more like a third world country. than anything that I thought we'd ever. become. >> Let me ask you this. >> Yeah. >> Why is it that large population centers. like places like Los Angeles and New. York are almost always run by the.

Democrats? Yeah. >> Like what is it about? First of all, what happened with the last election in. Los Angeles, the just the primary I I. think was so super sus. And here's why. it's super sus. >> Not just super sus that Spencer Platt, Spencer Pratt, who was in second place, got overtaken by Nithia Ramen in the. mailin ballots, but that the mail-in. ballots also passed a tax hike. The.

people voted to pay more taxes. >> Yep. >> In a state where you have the highest. taxes. >> That's right. >> They're like, "We don't pay enough.". [laughter]. >> That is insane. And then when you have. direct evidence that they were. recruiting homeless people. >> That's right. >> And they were getting homeless people. and giving them cigarettes and cash. There's evidence of this. To use their. their address and mail in ballots. >> Yeah. I would have I wouldn't be the. Californian Joe who wakes up in the. morning and says, "You know what? I'm.

going to go and vote for higher taxes. I. don't I don't pay enough taxes. >> I I feel like we could fix this if I. just%. more taxes." The crazy thing about it, too, is it's that okay, so after the. initial ballots all came in, it was. Karen Bass was number one, Spencer Pratt. was right right behind her, and then. number three, whatever this woman Ramen. Okay. So, you would expect the mail and. ballots to be more or less like the. original ballots in terms of one, two, and three. I'm not saying Spencer's.

going to win the mail and ballots, but. it just so happened that the third place. person in relative terms did a lot. better than the first and second place. person. such that the Republican was actually. kicked out of the race so that there's. not actually a real election in. California. That to me was the crazy. part. It's like you were designing the. vote share in order to kick Pratt out. and put the third person into second. place. That to me is like very very. bizarre cuz what is the theory of the. mail and vote that is somehow like so.

much more pro- Nithia relative to Karen. Bass? >> Makes no sense. >> Makes no sense. >> Makes no sense. Why would it be? Why why. would it be? I mean Karen Karen Bass was. ahead by every metric. >> Yeah. But I mean Okay. So you ask a. question. Why do all these blue states. or why do all these big cities. population centers end up becoming um. end up becoming blue? And I think it's. like very complicated, right? So, one. thing and you said this a few months ago.

and like when you said it, I was like. kind of annoyed by it, but then I like. thought there's there's like an element. of truth to it, which is that. Republicans still fundamentally have a. cool problem, right? There's something. more charismatic, more cool about the. Democrats as opposed to the right. >> And so you you said something about. >> there are too many dorks or something on. the right. >> There's a lot of dorks, >> you know. Fair. I'd say there's a lot of. dorks on the left. >> There's a lot of dorks on the left, too. It's a different kind of dork. >> It's a different kind of dork. But the. the point is that there's something, you.

know, like, okay, if you're a pop star, you're a rock star, you're an actor, you're in all these cultural centers, you're more likely to be left than. right. And so I think that a lot of. young people who are attracted to these. population centers, they sort of move. along with the prevailing culture. I. think that's that's one thing that's. going on. I think a second thing that's. going on is the people who are sort of. attracted to a certain kind of right of. center politics. They want the suburbs. They want the single family home. They.

kind of want to be left alone. They. don't want sort of to be able to hear. what their neighbors are doing. So I. think a little bit of it's just cultural. self-segregation. And that's meant that a lot of these. population centers have gone blue. But. it's very complicated. I've thought. about this a lot. And I also just man I. like I'm not one of these people who. says we should just abandon California. to the Democrats. Like let them deal. with their own problems. I think. California is like a quintessential part. of the American dream. Like if you just. abandon California, you've like lost.

something very core to American culture. And I I just I don't want to give up on. it. Like I'm not saying we're going to. win California in my lifetime. necessarily, but I don't like the idea. of giving up on it. Well, it's not just. giving up on I mean, giving up on it. would be terrible. It's an awesome. state. The the real problem is it's. deeply corrupt. >> I mean, deeply deeply corrupt. And what. they're trying to do is make it. impossible for the other side to win. Yeah. >> And there should be laws against that. First of all, the idea of mail-in.

ballots for anybody other than people. who are invalids who can't live their. homes or military or people that for. some reason they're serving overseas, they're doing something overseas, >> it should not be legal, right? >> And the fact that it became ubiquitous. during co is a giant problem. >> Yeah. So, this raises one of my total. segue here, side point, but so if you. remember in the aftermath of the 2020. election where there was all this like. debate about was the election stolen, was the election not stolen, all the. litigation that moved through,

>> there was a case in Pennsylvania that. like didn't get very much attention. And. I'm going to butcher it a little bit, but basically it was a guy in a rural. area of Pennsylvania saying, "You're. underounting my vote because we didn't. have the opportunity to do the mail-in. ballots like they did in Philadelphia. and Pittsburgh." And like the argument. was a kind of disparit impact, right? The cities jinned up all the mail and. balloting and the ballot harvesting. You. didn't do that in the country and that. hurt sort of our representation. So they.

take this case to the Pennsylvania. courts. And what's crazy is the. Pennsylvania courts basically say, you're making kind of a good point here. Like the ballot harvesting did affect. Republicans in a more negative way. It. did mean that certain people in the more. rural parts of the state were. underrepresented. But then the court. conclusion was this is not a problem a. court can fix. Like that's a political. problem. Change your, you know, local. elections leaders, change your laws. Like that's not a remedy that the court. has to fix. And so everybody saw that.

case and they're like, "Oh, the judge. rules against Donald Trump, rules. against Republicans for saying that. there was something illegitimate." But. no, actually the judge kind of said, "There is something kind of fishy here. We're just the wrong venue to fix it.". >> Well, it it's just very disheartening. that you you have to consider the fact. that it's really possible that the. elections get stolen. And the California. one was a big one for me. And why not. just have mail in or why not just have.

voter ID? >> Yeah, you actually that's insane. Not. only did they not have voter ID, you. can't show your ID. You're not allowed. to show your ID. >> You can in fact be like prosecuted if. you try to force somebody to show their. ID, >> which is that seems like you want people. to cheat. >> Exactly. [laughter]. >> And is this from the same people that. were saying you have to have an ID that. shows you've been vaccinated just four. years ago to go to grocery shopping or. to go to restaurant? Yeah. No, it's it's. definitely that's the part about it that.

I think makes most people of my. political persuasion skeptical of what. the Democrats are doing. Like if you. don't want to cheat in the election, then just make everybody actually show. an ID. What another thing people don't. realize is I didn't realize this until a. couple years ago, the voter ID solves a. lot of the mail-in ballot problem. because if you have to show an ID in. order to get a mail and ballot in order. to actually, you know, confirm that. there's a real identification attached. to that vote, that solves a big chunk of. the problem. >> It's just logical. Like [laughter] I.

don't I'm not. I'm not skeptical. I'm accusing them. I. think they stole the election. >> Yes. And I'm I'm I think it's common and. I you know this idea that elections. can't be stolen. I always say to people, okay, do you think that the amount of. election fraud is 0%. >> No one thinks that. >> Yeah. >> No one thinks it's zero. There's always. some overzealous person that works. somewhere that's doing something.

There's always crazy people. They're. like, "Blue no matter who, we got to win. or red no matter what." There's always. people right and left that are going to. try to rig the election because they. think it's imperative our n like look we. we saw there was people like Oprah. Winfrey was saying it like if we don't. win this election we you may never vote. again like what the are you talking. about [laughter] like why what who's. going to tolerate that left or right. that's crazy right. >> but that attitude allows people to.

justify cheating. >> correct. >> and I think they cheat and I I think. they've been doing it forever and I. don't think there's any other reason why. you would have no voter ID? And they try. to say, "Oh, it's racist to have voter. ID." Like, what are you talking about? Do you think other races are incapable. of going to the DMV? That's insane. >> It's it's that's racist. >> It's actually super racist. That's. really racist. >> The implication of their argument is. literally like blacks and Hispanics. cannot go to the DMV to get an ID. By. the way, if you look at the polling, black Americans are as pro- voter ID.

Even though they you most black. Americans vote Democrat, they're still. pro- voter ID as much as white Americans. is. Most Americans are voter. They want. voter ID except for operatives. >> So I'll offer on the Joe Rogan podcast. this deal as vice president of these. United States that if Democrats really. don't think that there's any cheating, give us voter ID. >> I just don't know. >> Give us voter ID and we'll stop talking. >> Why is that not a federal thing? >> We are trying to make it a federal. thing. So, we are right now trying to.

pass the Save America Act. One of its. main provisions is a requirement that. you do voter ID. And we actually have, I. think, a majority of the Senate that. would support it. But this is just weird. Senate procedural There is a. subsegment of people who want voter ID, but won't blow up the filibuster in. order to achieve it. And so they're so. married to these oldw world Senate. procedures that they're going to make it. impossible for us to pass Save America. Now we we are for what it's worth trying.

to fix that and trying to address these. like weird procedural archaic things. It's insane though. Like if you ever. Okay, >> I'm sure you hear people talk about the. filibuster all the time. I don't want to. go too far down this rabbit hole. >> Here's what the filibuster is. It is a. pure Senate rule. It is a creation of. the Senate procedures which basically. says that anything that has to do with. the budget is a 50 vote threshold and. anything that everything else. non-budgetary is a 60 vote threshold.

Now, as you can imagine, there's some. gray area on things that maybe are count. as budget issues and should be 50 or are. not budget issues and count at 60. So. what we have tried to persuade the. Senate to do is to treat the voter ID as. something that can fall within the 50. vote threshold. And there is no law, there's no provision in the. Constitution. It is legitimately that. there are senators who are so attached. to the idea that budget is 50,

non-budget is 60 that they're quite. literally willing to prevent voter ID in. America. >> God, it's nuts, dude. It's it's so crazy. >> and it's also like the idea that. >> somehow or like Kathy Hol had the. craziest take on it. Did you. >> She often does. >> Did you see her take on it? >> I have not. >> She was talking about black people in. inner cities not even knowing what a. computer is. >> Did you ever see that? >> No, I didn't see that.

>> Oh my god, it was so crazy. And then. this one comedian, uh, this black. comedian did this hilarious video where. he was like circling around a computer, staring at it, like touching it like he. didn't know what it was. [laughter]. >> It's just like, what are you talking. about? Everyone has a phone. That's a. computer. >> So many of these Democratic talking. points presume that their own voters are. actual idiots. >> That's actually there there's a big. difference between, you know, Republicans, we sort of presume that our. voters are adults. And you don't see.

that with a I'm not saying every. Democrat, of course, I don't want to. cast too broad of a brush here, but it's. it's like, you know, Gavin Newsome did. this speech a few months ago. The. president, I think it's the funniest. thing ever because he's like speaking to. a group of black leaders and black. businessmen, but it's like an audience. that is 95% black. And they're asking. him about his dyslexia and his struggle. with education. And he basically says, "Yeah, you know, um, I'm not very smart. like a lot of you." And it's like, >> I'm like you. I can't read. Can't even. read.

Well, there's a ton of interviews where. he's [laughter] talking about all the. books he reads. Like, he's so full of. He's. >> He's full of but it's. >> admirably full of [laughter]. >> It's It's I admire the the the. the sheer tenacity that he has in being. full of. >> I I It really is amazing. But it it. speaks to the incentives of there's kind. of like look, there's a real populism. that I'm very much a fan of because I. think you should be responsive to.

people, but there's like a faux populism. of the way that I'm going to appeal to. people is by assuming that they're. idiots and acting like they're idiots. Yeah. >> And then but but if you if you're. committed enough to that bit, eventually. it kind of leaks out what you're doing. >> And I think that's that was sort of what. Gavin did there is he told on himself a. bit. [laughter]. >> Yeah. Well, it was just it's just he's. bizarre. >> I will say I bizarre. >> So, I've only met Gavin I think I've. only met him one time in my life and it. was it's such a crazy experience. So,

the debate between Biden and Trump. during the 2024 cycle and I'm there I'm. actually doing an interview for a. documentary when the debate starts and. there's this clip of me. The debate. starts. I'm in the middle of this. interview. There's a big screen behind. me as I'm talking to the camera, which. is here, and I kind of freeze and I look. back at the the the TV and I'm like, "Oh. my god, like this is actually happening. Biden is imploding." Because if you. remember, it was obvious from the.

get-go. So, I go to the spin room. afterwards and that's where, you know, all these reporters and all the. surrogates of the candidates, this is. before I was the VP nominee and I'm just. like, you know, talking about how great. the president did, how bad President. Biden did. Okay, I see Gavin Newsome. there and he literally looks like he's. seen a ghost. Like I've I've never seen. a person who, as good of a bullshitter. as he is, who realized there was no. selling that performance. Like, but can. you imagine like try to put yourself in. the perspective of a human being? I.

always try to, you know, be empathetic. where Joe Biden has just had that debate. and you have to go on CNN to talk about. how great of a job Joe Biden did. Well, my favorite is Joe Scarboro because Joe. Scarro before it was like, you know, I'm. gonna say something and f you if you. can't take it. This is the sharpest. Biden we've ever seen. Have you ever. seen that? >> No, I haven't. >> Oh, it's amazing. And then after the. debate, he's like, "We got to get rid of. him. He's [laughter] got to go. He's got. to go, hey, hey, hey, what what what did. you say? You just said a couple of.

months ago, this is the best Biden. ever.". >> That's wild. Well, it's like I wonder. what was going on with that cuz like the. debates were earlier than they've ever. been before and it seemed to me it's. like there was a concerted effort to. hide what was wrong with him. >> 100%. >> 100%. Everybody was bullshitting. Everybody was gaslighting us. We all saw. it. I I remember a friend of mine who's. >> super progressive, super liberal. You. know [snorts] what I I talked about on. our podcast. I'm like, "This is crazy. even if he wins, he's not going to be.

the guy that's the president. You're. going to have his cabinet that are. running everything. Turned out I was. right. >> They were saying, "Oh, don't you. understand that he has a stutter?". >> And I said, "Where the was that. stutter in the 1990s?" Like that's. crazy. [laughter] Like a stutter that. only shows up when you're 80. That. doesn't make any sense. >> Like this is a lie. You're lying. He's. had two brain surgeries like where they. have to take the top of your head off. Literally, they have to take you like a.

cap. They. >> Wait, Biden had two brain surgeries? >> Oh, yeah. >> How did I not know this? >> You didn't know this? >> I didn't know that he had two brain. surgeries. >> He had two brain surgeries. Jimmy, please look this up. Make sure that I'm. right. I'm 99% sure I'm right. But I. know he had. a refund afterwards. >> Well, it kept [laughter] him alive. It. kept him alive. I mean, he here Biden. has not undergone recent brain surgery. He underwent two successful lifesaving. >> Oh wow. >> brain surgeries to repair two inter.

incraanial aneurysms in 1988. >> Know this? >> Yeah, >> that's pretty crazy. >> His medical professionals have stated. that he made a full recovery and. suffered no lasting brain damage or. cognitive impairment from these. procedures. Oh, it's from the Washington. Post, so you know it's accurate and. definitely not biased at all. And these. medical professionals, were those the. same people that said that the COVID. vaccine is safe and effective? Um, it's. it's we we live in a wonderful time for. It's like because they just. you right to your face. Like he.

had two brain surgeries, like major. brain surgeries, cuz he's having. aneurisms. >> I don't care who you are, that's. probably going to do some damage. >> It's going to leave some aneurisms, a. real problem. It's a real thing. Your. brain. people die from aneurysms all the time. See, that's the crazy thing is I never. even knew about that. >> How did you not know about that? That's. nuts. I knew about it. Well, it speaks. to how constrained our media environment. is that even I had never heard that, >> right? It was not a part of the. narrative. Certainly not from the. Democrats, but yeah, he's it was clearly.

I just don't understand why they ran him. in the first place. >> The the whole thing made no sense. And. then to have no primary and just stick. Kla in there and then all a sudden. pretend that she's the best thing ever. And like this idea, like complete flip. of her being the least popular vice. president ever, always sticking her foot. in her mouth, always saying crazy. How dare we say Merry Christmas? You. remember that one? >> Like what the is What are you. saying? Like joy is bad. Merry Christmas.

is bad. >> Legitimately when the campaign. consultants told me, "Hey, we're going. to hit this line because Kla Harris came. out in favor of taxpayerf funed sex. changes for illegal aliens. And. [laughter] I and I remember thinking to. myself, come on, you guys. Like, she. didn't really say that. It's taken out. of context. And then I go and look at. it. I'm like, holy she actually. said that. And she was she really was. like the very worst version of what the.

Democrats were producing in 2020. The. thing is, it was they were all doing it. because that was the incentives of the. party. Like if you remember that debate. where it was do you want taxpayer funded. Medicare for illegal aliens which like. Medicare is the program to provide. health care to the elderly that people. pay into for like you know your entire. working life. You see your little. Medicare tax statement and the idea that. we were going to give taxpayer funded. healthcare to illegal aliens. It was. just insane. It was a 9010 issue but.

their party in 2020 got kind of taken. over by the radicals. And I I think. actually maybe you're seeing a little. bit of that happening right now where it. seems like the radical organizations, the nonprofits, the donors are pushing. the party in a direction that most of. the voters haven't gone in. Like you ask. why Joe Biden was the nominee and I'll. I'll say something in defense of Joe. Biden. So like was he the most effective. politician? No. Had he had two brain. surgeries? Yes. And clearly had shown. the negative signs of aging. But he was.

kind of the only candidate, if you go. back to 2020, who could hold together. like the reasonable middle class black. American in the Atlanta suburbs with. whatever is going on on the far left of. the Democrat party. And I think this is. sort of the issue their party has. I. mean, our like to be candid, our party. has its own coalition problems. And it's. it's always tough in a two-party system. to hold everybody together. Like I think. about this a lot. I think it's really. tough on the Democrats because the core.

of their party, like the most important. voting block in the Democratic party is. middle-class black Americans, socially. moderate to even socially conservative, maybe a little bit more economically. populist on certain business and tax. issues. You know, they don't want to. give tax breaks to major corporations. They also don't want to trans the kids. That's the base of their party. But then. you've also got like the crazy people. and you have to kind of hold that. together. I think the argument for Biden. was he was one of the only people who.

could hold that together even though he. was an awful politician in his own right. even before he was like old. >> He was he was Obama's vice president. >> Exactly. >> And you know he's established he's a. known name and for the people that were. kind of casuals who weren't really. paying attention to politics like he's a. proven commodity. >> That's right. He doesn't read as a crazy. person to the general electorate. >> even though you know. >> I got hairy legs [laughter]. >> when he tells stories like I tell you.

about cord pop. Like what. >> the is going on? >> The thing I couldn't get over Biden is. is just bad staff work, man. The way. that he ate ice cream. I mean, it's. like, you know, we could bring some of. this stuff up, but it's like they would. get him eating ice cream in the most. ridiculous suggestive way imaginable. >> I never even paid attention. >> Oh my god. Like such bad optics. Okay. So, there's there's a clip I want to say. from the 2016. um campaign where somebody is.

campaigning in Iowa and like it's the. Iowa State Fair is like one of the main. things you go to when when you're. running for president and they give. somebody a corn dog and somebody eats. the corn dog and it becomes like a major. news cycle for a long time and I I will. never forget in 2024 [laughter] in 2020. >> That's how immature we are. >> I know. I know. You got to have a little. fun sometimes though. But in 2024, somebody is holding up a sign at the. Iowa State Fair at I think it may have. been Vakes, one of Aakes's event, Vake.

Rama Swami's events, and the sign says, "Eat the corn dogs, you coward." And. it's [laughter] one of the best the best. political signs I've ever seen. >> That's funny. That's funny. Yeah. You. You'd have to be a very manly man to be. able to eat a confidently confidently. eat a corn dog. >> I don't know that I can do it, Joe. >> I eat them. They're good. >> Yeah, but they taste good. Are you I. love corn dogs. I've been photographed. You've been photographed eating a corn. dog. >> I'm sure someone has. >> One of [laughter]. >> I've eaten corn dogs. The odds are. >> much more interesting life than I've.

led. I I try I try to eat my corn dogs. That's between that's between me and my. uh my kitchen. >> I'm not scared to eat a corn dog. [laughter] I just think it's funny that. people just they're so afraid of being. [snorts]. >> anything that looks like a dick. >> You can't bananas, corn dogs. >> You got to be [laughter]. you got to be careful when you're. politics. This is an optics based. business here. >> What are those popsicles? The ones that. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. I get it. I mean, but it's just. like that's how crazy we are. That. that's what weirds people out. The way.

someone eats a hot dog. >> That's. >> like Okay. >> Well, that's that's where we are, man. >> Yeah. >> I. >> It's the the difference between, you. know, the crazies and the the the real. reasonable Democrats is so stark to me. I did I and it's also with the right. It's like we're always the parties are. always defined by the worst examples of. the right. That's right. You know. Yeah. Or or of the left, you know, whatever it.

is, whether it's uh Patriot Front or. whether it's uh Antifa. >> Okay. So, who do you think is the worst. example of our side? Like who who do you. read about on our side and your reaction. is, "Holy shit." And don't say JD Vance. This is going to be a very awkward. interview. >> Um. >> I'm screwed with you. Well, the the. people that you know, one of the thing I. had James Tarico on the podcast and one. of the things that I think he has a. really good point about even though I. know you're Catholic and you're very. religious, putting the Ten Commandments.

in schools um I don't think is the right. way to do. And this is a guy Terrico who. was in seminary and is very Christian. Mhm. >> He just thinks that even though he. believes in the Ten Commandments, if. you're just only representing the. Christian faith in these schools, you're. forcing your religion into other. people's lives and that this is going to. push people away from Christianity. rather than encourage them to uh pursue.

it. >> Yeah. I mean, I think you'd never want. to force things on people. And I I do I. think one of the core Christian. contributions to Western civilization is. the idea of freedom of religion. It's. actually very much a Christian idea. because you recognize the dignity of. each individual. And part of recognizing. that dignity is that each person has to. find their own pathway to God. You can't. force this on anybody. I don't think. putting the Ten Commandments up in. school is like forcing things on. anybody. >> But it's public schools. So I mean, if.

you're going to do that, why not put. Buddhist scripture? Why not put, you. know, you Muslims stuff? You could you. could you could make an argument why you. should have a bunch of different. religious tenants in schools. >> I think in the Supreme Court there. actually are a lot of different sort of. historical, cultural, legal documents. that are up there. And I I want to say. that Moses coming down with a tablet is. one of them, but I I think there. actually are other cultural and maybe. even other religious elements of this. like where you recognize that a big part.

of sort of the lawgiving tradition in. Western civilization is the um is some. of these religious texts, not. exclusively Christian religious texts. Obviously some Jewish there's like a an. important contribution from the Muslim. world in this. So I I don't I I guess I. don't think of it as exclusionary while. also recognizing that, you know, America. is a society. Our founders were people. who were very much influenced even if. they weren't Christians, a lot of them. of course were, but were very influenced.

by Christian culture and articulating. American law. So my argument would be. even if you're not a Christian, like. does seeing the Ten Commandments, let me put it a slightly different way. Does seeing the Ten Commandments force. religion on a non-Christian child? I. mean, my argument would be no. And I'd. illustrate this by saying, well, there. are all of these ways in which you. actually could try to force religion on. a child, right? Well, it's not the worst. way to force religion on a child, but to.

have it and not represent any other rel. This is Texas, by the way. Sure. So what. he's talking about was that there's. these Christian nationalists, these. these guys that are very wealthy that. are trying to fund Christian schools and. trying to defund public schools or any. other kind of religious school and what. they want to do and and they passed this. to get the Ten Commandments in all. public school classes. and he's. fundamentally opposed to that as a. Christian because he thinks it's going. to force people to have this in their.

class and it's gonna push people away. from Christianity. >> I mean, I understand the argument. I. just don't see it that way. I mean, I I. I guess if if I I I hear you, but if I'm. a non-religious student and I'm sitting. in there and I see the Ten Commandments, at the very least, I think I can. appreciate it. I mean I you know what I. thought about this one sort of. >> what if you're a Hindu what if you're a. Muslim and you know and you are seeing. that represented but not your faith. Well, it's a public school. F.

>> first of all, I think that you you I. mean I I'm pretty sure Muslims I'm not. hardly an expert on Islam, but I I think. all of the Abrahamic faiths recognize. the Ten Commandments as like a. significant thing, but I think if I was. a Hindu looking at the Ten Commandments, I mean, again, it's hard for me to say. this right from my my perspective, but I. certainly went through an atheist phase. in my in my youth. And what I would see. that as as a non-religious person or a. different religion is I would say this. is like an important cultural element of.

the western civilization which is the. foundation of the classroom that I'm. sitting in. And this idea that the law. comes in is sort of above any man even. if you don't believe in God yourself. I. think that's like an important concept. I mean, if you look at the Ten. Commandments, probably eight of them are. something that I would hope that. everybody would agree with, even if. they're that not themselves religious. >> So, I I guess here's my my view on it. Like, I would not be offended if I sat.

in a classroom as a Christian or if my. kids sat in a classroom as a Christian. and saw, you know, a religious text that. wasn't Christian on on the wall. I would. encourage them to see that. No, I'd. encourage them to see that as a learning. experience to try to understand. >> What if it was from the Quran? What do a. bunch of. >> I guess it depends on what it was, right? If it's if it's like something. crazy, but but no, I mean, if if if it's. if it's something that is like. culturally interesting, I I guess I. don't I don't have a problem with my kid. reading.

>> The problem is it's mandated. Like if. you have a classroom and the teacher is. Christian and the teacher wants to have. it in their classroom, maybe that's one. thing. But if you're mandating that. you're going to have the Ten. Commandments in classrooms, that's a. different thing because now you're. you're pushing Christianity on kids. And. this is Terico's position. And as a. Christian, he's saying I think this is. going to push children away from. Christianity. >> So I again I I I understand what he's. saying. I just I think that part of.

living in a society where you have. different people of different. perspectives, but you do have I mean. Christianity is the majority religion of. the United States. It is the religion. that was extraordinary influential to. our founding to the constitutional. principles. Again, freedom of religion. is itself not really a liberal concept. It was originally derived um from from. from a Christian idea about free will. and the dignity of the person. I think. part of that is that you accept that. you're going to have exposure to. different things. And if a if a state.

legislator in a majority Christian state. wants, it's not like they're putting the. Ten Commandments in front of these kids. and saying, "You have to read this and, you know, write it 500 times a day.". They're exposing kids to something. And. I'm comfortable with kids being exposed. to a lot of different things. I think. that's part of living in a society where. there's a free exchange of ideas. And. what I what I worry about with. Tallerico's sort of perspective here is. is again I'm not saying that I I don't.

want kids to be exposed to anything that. is outside of the Christian cannon. Like. I I I actually want my kids exposed to. things. I I write about this in the book. that I think it's important to have a. grounded enough faith that you can. engage with a lot of different ideas and. still ultimately you know sort of hold. on to your to your Christian faith. But. isn't part of just living in a like. pluralistic democracy that people are. going to be exposed to different things? And you know, I I would kind of put it. on Tallerico in a slightly different way.

that for a long time in this country, there were actually Supreme Court. rulings that said that you cannot pray. in a school, even a a student. organization led by the students, or. that you cannot put the Ten Commandments. up, even a teacher who chose to do it in. their own classroom. And so I think. you're always kind of trying to strike. this balance, you know, given that we. have the first amendment in this country. between allowing the practice of. religious faith in public spaces and. possibly forcing religion on other.

people. I think you have to strike that. balance the right way. I guess I just. say is the if the Ten Commandments being. in a classroom is the thing that you. think is forcing religion on somebody, was he equally offended when the Ten. Commandments were like quite literally. prohibited from being listed in. building? >> I don't know if he was offended by that. or if he was opposed to that. But the. idea of being exposed to it is one. thing. It being mandatory is another.

And to mandate that in classrooms is a. different thing because you're promoting. clearly promoting Christianity. And his. position is that promoting Christianity. in that way is going to have an opposite. effect on children. You're pushing it on. them instead. You're not just exposing. it to them. You're pushing it on them. And especially if you're pushing it on. children who come from a household that. has a different faith. I guess I just. think the balance in our country the. last 30 40 years has actually been much. more in the other direction which is. that we try to completely remove. religion from the public square and I.

think that's that's that poses its own. problems because you know people. practice their faith in all kinds of. ways. We think that that's the. responsibility of churches and and. synagogues and where that like if you. want and and in the community if you. want to promote religion promote it that. way. But promoting in public schools. should be just educational. And if. you're in a religious class and a a. class is teaching about religion, that's. a different story. >> Well, you're right. It's certainly the.

responsibility of churches and. synagogues and mosques and so forth. But. I also think that, you know, the the the. late Supreme Court Chief Justice William. Ranquist sort of said this that if your. approach to religion in public life. always and everywhere is to push it out. of the public square, then you're. actually embracing a religion of your. own in the public square, which is. secularism. You're just taking one. religion and replacing it with. secularism. And I guess what I'm saying. is I'm kind of comfortable with people. of different faiths sharing the public.

square together. But part of that is. that if if I'm in a 95% Christian. community and my local city council. wants to put up a nativity display on. on, you know, Christmas Eve, I'm okay. with that. And that was actually like. for a long time in our country actually. prohibited. Yeah. >> And so what what I think is that we got. we we we sort of put ourselves in this. frame in this country where we said. every public display of religion is. somehow illegitimate. But I I I mean I.

don't know. I I try to live my faith in. a way that's consistent across different. spheres of my life. You know, I don't. preach to people. I don't like to walk. into the White House tell my employees, you know, you need to be you need to. follow Jesus as your Lord and Savior. I. just try to live my life in a way that. hopefully makes people a little curious. about what you know, what motivates me. and what inspires me. But I also don't. think that the expectation should be. that we tell religious people they're. not allowed to be religious in the. public square because I think that's. what we've done over the last 30 or 40.

years. I guess, you know, we can agree. to disagree. I see the Texas thing as an. an attempt to correct that. This episode. is brought to you by Fox Nation. Real. American freestyle wrestling is. exclusively on Fox Nation. Every month. you get every feud, every match, and. every belt. And if you're a fan of MMA, you don't want to miss it because RAF is. featuring some of the biggest UFC. fighters and putting them against the. best wrestlers in the world. On July. 18th, RAF11 turns up the heat when Ben.

Ascrin returns to the mat to take on. former UFC champion Bal Muhammad. Then. two undefeated RAF stars finally face. off when Arman Sarukian and Kobby. Coington settle their score in the main. event. No cages, no gloves, no excuses. RAF11, live from Milwaukee, Saturday, July. 18th, streaming exclusively on Fox. Nation. Go to foxnation.com and sign up.

today. Well, I think living by example. is probably the best promotion of any. good way to live your life, whether it's. Christianity or any other religion. I. think that's definitely the way to do. it. But the the point is that this is. being promoted by very wealthy people. who are Christian nationalists who who. want this to be uh they want it to what. is going on here, Jimmy? What you got? Bible stories become required reading in. Texas public schools. Yeah. See? Well, now that's a you're taking it to another.

level. So, this is June 26. This is very. recently. Um. that is that kind of thinking and. that kind of mindset is uh what bothers. me the most about some Republicans. >> I see what you mean. Um, and then. there's the there's people that again. they live their life in a very beautiful. way and they follow the teachings of.

Jesus Christ and they're very admirable. and I think that's very attractive and. it makes people very curious about that. religion. I think that brings people to. Christ and I think it brings people to. religion. >> Sure. But then there's people like, did. you read that report uh that came from. at the start of the Iran war where uh. there was a guy who was an officer uh. non-commissioned officer who was uh at a. a briefing and this guy came in and was.

explaining to them that they didn't need. to be afraid because this war was. important because Trump had been. anointed by Jesus Christ to bring about. his return. And the way they were going. to Jesus is going to return is by. bombing Iran. [laughter]. >> I did not see that report. >> That sounds pretty far out there to me. >> This is the kind of right-wing I see. >> thinking. So here it is. Military. commander tells troops bombing Iran is.

part of God's divine plan. So, we. started getting calls in the wee hours. of Saturday morning from people saying. their commanders were just jubilant. about this, trying to tell people, "Don't worry, it's all part of God's. plan. Uh, they promised a 200 mile long. river that is 4 and 1/2 ft deep, filled. with nothing but the blood that their. weaponized version of Jesus will spill. at the battle of Armageddon." Weinstein. said, u what what was the one uh there. was a there was an article where the guy. was explaining the actual quotes that.

the the one uh officer was telling him. >> the one commander. Uh yeah, but it's not that there was is. very specific. He was it was very. specific what he said. Um, I mean, for what it's worth, my my. attitude on this stuff is I mean, first. of all, as a Christian, you sort of. believe that everything is is part of. God's plan, even things that are. ultimately very terrible. I mean, you. kind of have to make. >> it. Let me let me read the quote. He.

urged us to tell our troops that this. was all part of God's divine plan. And. he specifically referenced numerous. citations out of the book of Revelations. referring to Armageddon and the imminent. return of Jesus Christ. He said that. President Trump had been anointed by. Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran. to cause Armageddon and mark his return. to Earth. >> Okay. >> If I'm in that meeting, I'm like, "Hit. [laughter] the brakes. Hit the brakes." What? >> Well, that's that's where you need some. of the psychedelics we talked about at. the last Joe Rogan JD Vance.

conversation. [laughter]. >> That would definitely help. >> I mean, my my response first of all, like obviously, do I endorse that? No. Do I think that it's important that. people reign it in a little bit? Because. I'm sure you're right. There were a lot. of troops there, probably a lot of. Christian troops there who were like, uh, I'm not sure this is exactly right. Right. >> But the the important point is I think. it's important as a Christian leader, as. Christians, period. One of the things we. have to do is just have humility in the. face of of God's plan. There's a lot.

that we don't understand. There's a lot. that we don't get. And I think. especially on matters of war and peace, the approach that I try to take is you. try to make the best decisions that you. can. You hope that you're on God's side. You don't assume that God has taken your. side. That's a that's a very famous. Abraham Lincoln quote. And that's the. attitude that I take. So for that, what. I, you know, what I would encourage that. NCO to say is, you know what, God is in. control. We don't know what's going to. happen, but let's pray and try to do as. good of a job as we can trusting in God.

If I was speaking to a group of. Christian troops, that's what I would. say. >> But you're speaking to a group of. troops. You don't know if they're. Christian. You don't know. I mean, you're essentially letting these people. know that you believe that Trump was. anointed by Jesus to bomb Iran so that. Jesus can come back to Earth. >> Come back in a firearm. >> I'd be like, "Can I get the out of. here?". >> No, I hear you, man. I hear you. Look, yes. And uh I I uh that's that is the. first that I have ever heard of this.

particular story. How have you not heard. of this and Biden's two brain surgeries? >> Apparently, I live in a bunker, man. [laughter]. >> How do you not know about these things? >> Wild. I Okay, here's the other thing. I'll say is is. having heard about this for the first. time just now. To your point about the. media, >> I do think it's possible, let's be. honest, that whatever that dude said, maybe it was good, maybe it was bad, has. been misreported by the press. So, I.

always have a filter on this stuff. Like. I don't automatically assume. >> It's also possible that this is the. other thing. He said the commander. supposedly had a big grin on his face. when he said all this, which made his. message seem even more crazy. >> And I think that's again. >> I don't think anybody should have um. war is sometimes necessary, but it's. never a good thing. And that I think. that's like a fundamental Christian. principle is there are just wars, there. are necessary wars, but war is always. something that you try to avoid,

>> right? But saying that this is what's. being referenced in the book of. Revelation, >> dude. I think that's I think that is. nuts. I also don't know that that, you. know, I want to be conf I want to. confirm that it's a person actually said. that before teeing off on it because. what that sounds to me is like somebody. butchering or misrepresenting something. that you know somebody that I know might. have said. >> quite possible. So you got to be. careful. Also quite possible that you. got a really looney guy who is a.

Christian nationalist who is a commander. and who is in this position where he's. actually excited because he does think. that this is a holy [laughter] war and. this is going to bring back Jesus. >> Well, it's certainly possible. I mean, America's got 330 million people and. we've got a lot of people who believe in. a lot of things. But I can assure you. that we don't encourage people to talk. like that. And again, all I can do as a. Christian leader, I'll look into that. story certainly, but all I can do as a. Christian leader is talk about how I. think about questions of war and peace, which is we try to do the right thing.

We try to figure out what it is that is. consistent with Christ's moral teaching. and we try to, you know, comport our. foreign policy with the cause of. justice. And that's what we try to do, recognizing it's always going to be. imperfect. But I don't think that we. should ever have an attitude towards war. like this is a this is a great thing. I'm going to grin and smile about that. All I'm saying is I'm skeptical that. anybody took that approach because the. media misrepresents everything. >> Do you think that this the way that you.

just described it align with our. campaign in Iran? >> Well, I think that the goal is certainly. good, which is to prevent Iran from. getting a nuclear weapon. And I I think. that there are obviously. a lot of questions about how best to. achieve that. There's both a short-term. and a long-term piece of it. I think the. short-term piece of it is effectively. what's already been done which is you. destroy the nuclear sites and you. destroy and eliminate the ability to. rebuild the nuclear sites. I think.

there's a longer term thing which is. where like a lot of the debate is. focused on right now which is that. building a nuclear program is hard but. it's not impossible and it's expensive. but it's actually not even that. expensive if you look I mean you could. go on YouTube right now and find out how. to build an atomic bomb. So part of our. Iran policy, and this is where I get. frustrated with the people who say you. should never negotiate with Iran, part. of our Iran policy is like solving the. long-term problem that if we could. create the sort of circumstance where.

Iran would commit not just to not have a. nuclear weapon right now, but over the. long term to not try to rebuild that. capacity, like yeah, I think that that. is a good and valuable thing. >> If it was your call, would you have done. exactly the same [laughter] thing? Well, what did the the president said um. publicly that JD was less enthusiastic. about it, I think was the exact phrase. that he used. >> I mean, my attitude towards this man, as. you know, is the vice president. I'm not. a public commentator. Like, my job is to.

give the best advice I can to the. president of the United States. I think. he's said a little bit about what that. advice was. Um, but once the president. makes a decision, so long as I think. that it's, you know, legal and ethical. and all that stuff, and I certainly. think whether you agree or disagree with. it, what we've done has been has been. legal, my attitude towards it is I try. to make it as successful as possible. And I've got friends, of course, I think. you know, you've expressed some. skepticism of this. I've got a lot of. friends both in private and public.

who've expressed skepticism of this who. say, "Well, this is terrible. We. disagree with the decision, etc., etc.". I'm not a public commentator. My. approach to this is not to Monday. morning quarterback a decision that was. made three months ago. My approach to it. is to try to make it as successful as. possible. Which is why I've poured my. heart and soul into these negotiations. Which is why I've tried to make that. goal, Iran not having a nuclear weapon, something that's not true both not just. now, but is true in the long term. And. that's the way that I try to approach. it. So, what is going on with Iran where.

it seems like the president keeps saying. that a deal has been reached, negotiations have been successful, and. then it all falls apart, and we start. bombing them again. >> Yeah. So, uh, how long do we have here? Cuz as much as you need So, so, so I. have to explain a couple of things in. the background so you sort of fully. appreciate, um, people fully appreciate. what's going on here. So number one, it's a bit of a simplification, but you. have two elements within the Iranian.

system. You have and and you sometimes. hear hawkish Americans say this that. they're all crazy people. They want to. bring about, you know, the the 12th imam. and the apocalypse and all that stuff. There are people in Iran who believe. that they're also pragmatists. You've. got the crazy people, you've got the. pragmatists. Okay. So when we struck. thisou and really what theou says, and. I've it was misrepresented more than. almost anything that I've ever worked on. in public life. What it says is Iran is. going to open the straight of Hormuz. The violence is going to stop and then.

we're going to negotiate to see if we. can come to a broader deal on the. long-term nuclear issue. That's what we. wanted. And what the Iranians wanted, of. course, was long-term economic and. sanctions relief. Now, here's here's the. problem with where we are right now. And. and and I guess my summary view, Joe, is. that I of course can't predict the. future. I don't know exactly where this. is going to go, but I think. fundamentally we are on the right. trajectory. It's just going to be really. messy and there's going to be a lot of. stops and starts. So what happens the.

first week after we sign theou, we get. 20 million barrels a day of oil out of. the straight of Hormuz. That's what it. was before the war. The price of oil. comes way down and there are elements, the hardliners in the Iranian system. kind of freak out a little bit. They're. like, "Oh did we just give away. our major leverage point? Screw nuclear. weapons. We just gave away this." So in. thisou and so there was this kind of. freak out in their system. So they shot. at a couple ships we responded and I. think that's entirely appropriate of. course if they're going to shoot at.

ships we are going to shoot at the. people who are shooting at the ships or. we're going to destroy the facilities. that they're using to shoot at ships. So. that happens okay and then the Iranians. like oh no no fine that that you're. you're right we shouldn't have been. shooting at ships. So then they come. back to the table and there's a few more. days of negotiation and then the phase. they're in right now is the hardliners. have really really reacted strongly to. all the oil that's coming out of the. straight of Hormuz and they've basically. said we're going to try to shut this. thing down. We're scared about losing. our leverage. Now the pragmatists in.

their system are saying this was a. mistake. Let's keep on talking. And. again do I know how this is ultimately. going to shake out? Of course I don't. But what we're doing is a delicate. diplomatic dance where we're using. economic leverage points. We're using. carrots and sticks. We're trying to talk. to the pragmatists. And then of course. when they commit acts of violence, we're. responding to it. And all those things. are happening simultaneously to get us. on a better trajectory. Now that said, yes, right now there's there's shooting. right now. Last night they shot at some.

ships. The but with all that said, is. their nuclear program still destroyed? Yes. Are the straits not necessarily. fully pre-war traffic, but are we. getting enough oil and gas out of the. straight of Hormuz to prevent a. worldwide energy crisis? Yes. And all of. these things are happening in the. context of the broader negot negotiation. over the nuclear program. You never know. where this is ultimately going to end. up, but that's where we are. And then. the can I just say one other thing about. this because [sighs] there are people.

you know you see Mike Pence who's sort. of a superhawk my predecessor who say. this there are people you know um who. are super hawkish in the American system. who have attacked the deal and and. frankly in some ways have tried to. derail the deal and what I always say to. those people is what is your proposal. what is your actual argument so so just. take the straight of horm like the. narrowest but in some ways the most. important part of this back and forth. right now. Straight of Hormuz is a.

narrow waterway. To the extent you shut. it down, you shut down 25% of the. world's energy supply. Okay, Joe, you. could take a $100,000 and go buy a bunch. of drones on the black market and post. yourself on an island in the Straight of. Hormuz near it and you could fire drones. at those ships. Okay? Now, what does. that mean? some oil and gas is still. going to get out because some ships and. some ship captains gonna say screw you. Now, the United States can help that, right? We can shoot down some of those.

drones. We can shoot down some of those. missiles and so we can facilitate the. flow of traffic. But the people who are. like, you cannot negotiate with the. Iranians. The reason why that's. fundamentally idiotic is because so long. as you have some person who's willing to. fire off a few cheap drones, you're. going to have some ship captains who. say, "No, no, no. we're not willing to. do this. So, we got to kind of use all. tools at our disposal. The military is. one tool, but diplomacy is another tool. And I I'm very frustrated by the.

Americans and frankly by people in other. countries who are like, you cannot. negotiate with the Iranians. Well, then. what is your proposal to get people to. stop shooting at ships in the straight. of Hormuz? You can bomb them. You can. take away their radar. You can take away. some of their drones and some of their. missiles, but it's just too easy to fire. at ships in the straits. So, you've got. to actually be willing to talk and to. try to figure out the problem. >> What is their proposal? The people that. think you shouldn't negotiate with Iran. >> I think that their proposal is to bomb.

and bomb and bomb. And the honest view, Joe, is that they they do not actually. have a solution. If you actually ask. them, "What do you want us to do? What. is the goal that you're trying to. achieve?" You know, they'll they'll say. things like, "Well, just bomb them to. oblivion." Okay, we can do that. We can. drop a lot of bombs, but what does that. accomplish if there's still a crazy. person who's still willing to shoot a. few drones at the straight of Hormuz? What the president has done, I think. very very capably is said, "We're going. to use military force in the in this.

situation when it's connected to. something we're trying to achieve." So, if you shoot at ships, we're going to. shoot at the facilities at which you. used to shoot at the ships. But we're. not just going to do something. open-ended indefinitely. We're not just. going to bomb and bomb and bomb. We're. going to try to use our military force. as one of the many tools that we have to. solve the problem. And obviously, like. I'm biased, but I think that's exactly. the right approach. I I actually think. you have to read between the lines a. little bit because if if you look at. what Mike Pence or some of the. conservative hawks, like people who.

voted for us, but have been very. critical of me, very critical of the. administration, if you actually look at what they're. proposing, they just want the military. campaign to go on forever. and they. can't actually identify what it is that. they're trying to accomplish. None of. them can identify what it is they're. trying to accomplish. And I and I read. two things between the lines. I think. some of them want us to accomplish a. complete change in the government of. Iran to topple the clerics and to. replace that those clerics with somebody.

who's, you know, much friendlier. But. like look, what is our experience with. doing that? >> It's not good. Right? And so, like, if. the Iranian people want to rise up and. change their government, that's up to. them. But we're not going to send. 150,000 ground troops in in order to. accomplish a change in a regime unless. the people on the ground themselves want. to accomplish that outcome. Now, we're. not going to send the troops in. regardless, but like to propose sending. in the troops,

you're basically saying that the US. military should do the job for the. Iranian people. We're not in that. business anymore. We're just not. And. then I think a second outcome that. people are are whether they're aware of. it or not is what I call the Libya. outcome. So if you look at the end. result of our Libya policy after Gaddafi. was killed by the Obama administration, by the way, again, a a very stupid. decision, what happened? Libya basically. turned into a failed state. You had a.

refugee crisis. You had people pouring. into Europe, pouring into other parts of. Asia, other parts of Africa. You had a. lot of violence, a lot of terrorism come. from that. I do think that there are. people who would like that to be the. outcome in Iran. But then I say again, what is in our interest? How is it in. the United States's interest to have 94. million desperate people flooding into. Europe, flooding into the United States, to have, you know, sort of the the. terrorist infrastructure that can get. established when you fan terrorists all.

over the world? We've run this. experiment before. And so our policy. right now, what we're trying to. accomplish is get the straits open, ensure the free flow of oil and gas, obviously want to keep the Iranians from. having a nuclear weapons program, and. using the tools of diplomacy and. military power to accomplish that. >> And Libya failing and the collapse of. Libya is a lot of what's fueled the. migrant crisis in Europe as well. Correct.

>> Exactly. that in Syria, another failed. state that was created by bad Middle. Eastern policy. So there is precedent. for the United States doing this. Every. time that it has happened, it's caused a. refugee crisis. It's caused a spike in. terrorism. And it's also not. incidentally to the moral. considerations. It's led to a lot of. innocent civilian deaths. >> Now, what was the the talk about I think. the number was like $300 billion in. concessions to Iran to rebuild. Yeah. So, this is another just.

argument that the critics made against. the deal. And and and again, like I just. to back up a little bit, this is my own. little hobby horse, but look, we the. coalition that Donald Trump piloted to. the 2024 election campaign. It was a. landslide. We won seven states. It was. historic. Nobody, certainly no. Republican had actually led a coalition. like that, at least since the days of. Ronald Reagan. So, like literally before. I was alive. Okay. So, Donald Trump wins.

this great coalition and look, it's got, man, it's got hawks and it's got people. who hate foreign wars. Okay. It's got. people like you and people like Tucker. It's also got people like Mark Leven and. others. Okay. I just accept that as a. reality. That's part of the coalition. I. don't say that anybody is welcome or. unwelcome. I say that if you're willing. to sort of help us, you're going to get. a lot what you want. You don't get. everything that you want. What has. really annoyed me about the the hawkish. side of this thing is.

they attack any effort to negotiate. They attack the president. They attack. me personally. Donald Trump is betraying. me. Well, wait a second. I if you if you. if you want to have like a hawkish. policy towards Iran, the idea that. Donald Trump has betrayed you because. he's also trying to negotiate to get a. good outcome for the American people is. crazy. And so you've seen a lot of these. people completely flip on him. And that. brings me to the 300 million or the $300. billion point. What we what we did with.

with theou is is we actually worked not. just with the Iranians but with the Gulf. Arab states. >> What is the term? What does it stand. for? >> Memorandum of understanding. It's the. basic it's the basic structure that we. set up for the negotiation. So what what. happened here is okay so people sort of. think of of the Middle East as like Iran. versus Israel. I think a lot of people. do. There's also a massive number of. Gulf States that are really important, good allies to the United States. You. know, they and Israel don't always see.

eye to eye, but we're obviously very. close to both Israel and to the Gulf. States. And the Gulf States actually. came to us and said, "You know what? If. the Iranians are willing, really willing. to change their behavior, we'd like to. invest in rebuilding their country.". Now, whether they change their behavior is. something that's going to be determined. over the long term, right? We want to. see real changes. We want to see them to. stop funding terrorist organizations. And also, of course, none of that money. comes from the United States. But if. Iran's biggest enemies in the region are.

saying, "We'd like to invest if they've. changed their behavior. Would the United. States let us? Would we release the. sanctions that would make it possible. for the UAE and Saudi Arabia and other. countries to invest in Iran?" Our. attitude was, well, isn't that a victory. for us? If Iran's biggest enemies see. that they have changed themselves so. much that they're willing to invest in. the Iranian economy, isn't that like the. definition of a win-win? And then you. had all these people saying, "No, no, no, no. You can't give them $300.

billion." It's like, we're not talking. about giving them $300 billion. We're. talking about letting other countries. invest in Iran if Iran has changed the. way that it treats the Gulf Arab. countries. It's fundamentally between. them, meaning the Iranians and the Gulf. Arab countries. So there's this line in. theou that basically says that if Iran. meets all of its obligations, then we. will permit other countries to invest in. Iran. That's it. And that like again, the hawks attacked us and misrepresented.

this and lied about it and said the. Trump administration is going to give. the Iranians $300 billion. And it's. totally fake. It's completely made up. and it was done purely in order to. politically tank the negotiation. So. there there's been this interesting. dynamic here where as we've been trying. to negotiate, there have been these. extraordinarily wellunded efforts to. tank the negotiation to prevent us from. reaching a deal to change American. public opinion, which by the way, if you.

look at the public opinion, people love. the idea of actually getting to a final. resolution on this thing. Americans do. not they're not game for long-term, you. know, open-ended regime change wars in. the Middle East. They're okay with us. using the military to accomplish. discrete objectives. They're not okay. with open-ended obligations. >> What do you think the motivation of the. hawks is? Do do you think this is are. they influenced by defense contractors?

So the influence what is what's the. reason why they're so keen on continuing. to bomb? >> I think with with any big group of. people you have you know you have a. diversity of opinions. So so sure I I'm. sure that you know you have people who. are influenced by defense contractors. You know there's a lot of talk about how. how much is the Israeli government. influencing American politics and uh. there are certainly certain people. within the Israeli government who hate. the deal. And we we we see exact.

evidence. There was a Times story that. came out yesterday. um that basically there are certain. influencers in America who are being. paid in order to attack the deal. I. think some of it it's just pure. political ideology, right? It's foreign. policy perspectives that is that are. much different from mine. They think. that America should just that we can. basically you can wave a magic wand with. the military and accomplish whatever you. want. And you know, it's it's not that. simple. You actually have to have a very.

clear objective. Military power can. accomplish a clear objective, but you've. got to have that clear objective. You. can't just say, "We're going to bomb. until something good happens." That. never works. The United States has tried. that before. So, I think it's a. combination of things, but I I. definitely think you have seen this very. discreet, extremely well-funded campaign. to try to derail the negotiation and try. to derail the deal. And you know, there. was again there's this time article that. came out yesterday. A friend sent it to.

me. It's like worth reading because it. lists a bunch of people who have quite. literally been paid. by a former Trump campaign person who. was himself paid by certain elements. within the Israeli government. And those. people are attacking me viciously for. quite literally trying to accomplish the. negotiation objective that the president. set for the country. So, >> what is their position? Like, are. they're attacking you? How? >> Oh, it's it's social media posts. It's,

you know, they're leaking to reporters. They're attacking me obsessively saying. that we should not be negotiating with. Iran. We should just keep the military. campaign going indefinitely. And that is. that is their explicit position. and. coming after me saying that, you know, people have come after me and say that. I'm influenced by Qatar, that I'm. influenced by foreign governments, that, you know, I take my marching orders from. Tucker Carlson. And there there's just. so much out there when what I'm. actually trying to do is accomplish what.

the president of the United States told. me to accomplish, which is a settlement. of this that accomplishes our. objectives. Iran doesn't have a nuclear. weapon. We have the free flow of oil and. gas. and and and like I should be clear. um you know. like I don't actually mind I don't mind. that the. you know let's say certain elements of. the Israeli government want to criticize. the deal or have disagreements about the. deal. I don't even mind an effort to try.

to influence, you know, foreign. governments try to influence the United. States all the time. You know, Israel. does it, other countries do it. It's. just sort of the nature of the beast. What bothers me is actually when. Americans allow, meaning American. leadership allows that influence to. affect their judgment and to affect what. they are advocating for. That's what. really bothers me. People are always. going to try to influence the United. States of America, whether they're.

allies of ours or whether they're. enemies of ours. But again, when I open. up the pages of Time magazine and I see. that there's a literal foreign influence. campaign being funded to tank the very. deal that I was pursuing and oh, by the. way, many of the people who were. receiving that money were actually. attacking me in completely dishonest. ways. You know, my response to that is, well, go to hell. I'm going to do what I. have to do for the American people. I. represent Americans first, and that's. the way that I've I've tried to to do.

this job. And I, you know, Joe, the. crazy thing is I'm like, people don't. realize this. I'm actually in this, you. know, there's this massive pro-Israel, anti-Israel debate in the United States. of America. I'm like the reasonable. moderate. And I think that's what so. many people don't realize is, you know, I've been accused of being an. anti-semite. I've been accused been. accused. >> for what reason? uh quite literally for. um I I've been accused of trying to I.

guess some people say that I've insulted. the Jewish religion which is insane. Like I like I have a ton of respect for. the Jewish religion. I mean if you talk. about. >> What specifically did you say that. >> I don't know I've never heard the a good. compelling argument for why I'm an. anti-semite even though I've been. accused of being an anti-semite by many. people. But it's it I what always what I. say to these guys is look at public. opinion. Look at the way young. Republicans versus Republicans over the.

age of 65 approach this issue. Like. right now, Israel is losing the public. opinion battle in the United States of. America. It is a simple and obvious. fact. Donald Trump has said that. publicly. It's a simple and obvious. fact. that is. >> well let me finish this point because. okay my attitude is towards this is. >> Israel is an ally like France or like. the United Kingdom we're going to have. disagreements with them we're going to. have agreements with them there are.

areas where we're going to have similar. interests and areas where our interests. are going to diverge so my approach to. this is to say you know what we're. partnered great let's work together and. we're not let's just be honest about it. and I for that people attack me for. being an anti-Semite or anti-Israel and. they don't see the writing on the wall. that I'm actually just the guy. advocating for a normal relationship. with a normal country that's based. around shared interest as opposed to. based around, you know, something else.

So why why is Israel losing um why is. Israel losing American public opinion? Well, the narrative is that Israel has a. very disproportionate effect on American. politics. >> Yeah, I see that. I see that narrative. I mean, I actually think that. they. look, do they try to influence American. politics? Yes. But like I said earlier, a lot of other countries do. I think. some. >> to the extent that Israel does. >> I think some are better at it than.

others. I think the Israel are. definitely more effective at it than. most. But I wouldn't say that they're. the only effective country by any means. that tries to influence American. politics. I just think you have to be. self-aware about it. I mean, why. wouldn't you? It's a country of 9. million people. We have 330 million. people. And so, of course, they're going. to try to persuade Americans. They're. going to try to move Americans in one. direction or another. I think that's. just the nature of the beast. >> But it's more than that. The concern is. that they're spying on American. politicians. That they're there's.

there's there's concerns about funding. There's concerns about influence. There's concerns about whether or not. politicians are whether they're aligned. with Israel or whether they're aligned. with the United States first. >> Well, there's certainly [sighs]. like I definitely get those concerns, but my sense is that the way that all. foreign influence works in the United. States is people try to manipulate. American public opinion and then from. manipulating it public opinion they try.

to get the outcomes that they want. I. this thing is a very good example of. this. So, you know, like we know, I'm. telling you beyond a reasonable doubt, we know that the negotiation strategy. that the president has asked us to. pursue and again with limitations like. when the Iranians hit ships, the. president has been willing to knock the. hell out of the Iranians in response. This is not just a negotiation. It's. negotiation, it's military, it's all. these things. But I know with beyond a. shadow of a doubt that there have been.

people within the Israeli government who. are trying to like actually shift us. away from that policy because they want. to continue the military campaign. And. by the way, like there are people within. their government that I love, I have. good relationships with. I hope and I. don't think that they're part of this. I. mean, you know, the the ambassador of of. uh Israel to the United States, I think. is actually really good guy. Obviously, he cares about Israel first. I care. about America first. But there are some. people within their system, we know. beyond a shadow of a doubt, who are.

manipulating and trying to change. American public opinion to keep the war. going on indefinitely. Again, not. towards any objective, but just. indefinitely. So like, does it happen? Yes. But I guess what I would say to the. Americans who sort of see this and are. frustrated by it, my attitude would be. you should be frustrated at American. leaders who are, you know, persuaded by. this, affected by this. Countries are going to do what countries.

do. I really don't. It doesn't bother me. that Qatar tries to influence the United. States of America and they do. I like a. lot of the Qataris just like I like a. lot of the Israelis. Doesn't bother me. that Israel tries to do this. It frankly. doesn't even bother me that Russia or. some of these other countries do it. It's just the nature of being a. political leader in 2026. What does. bother me is when those operations, those influence campaigns actually. affect American political judgment. because they shouldn't because we should. be thinking what is in the best interest.

of the United States of America. >> Do you think that Israel is affecting. American political judgment? Um, I mean, I certainly think that. there are a lot of talking points and. there are a lot of arguments that make. their way into American political. discourse. I think there are a lot of. social media campaigns that definitely. influence Americans and affect.

Americans. Do I think that it's been. dispositive on any particular issue like. like I think that's a much more. difficult question. >> Do you think that we would have started. this war in Iran without the influence. of Israel? >> I think the president completely. separate from any influence from Israel. believes very strongly and again I agree. with this that Iran should not have a. nuclear weapon. I think he was willing. to do things. >> bombed them in June. >> Right. That was the initial attack, right?

>> June of last year. Yeah. Midnight. hammer. >> Yeah. Right. Do you think he would have continued. with the most recent campaign if it. wasn't for the influence of Israel? >> Yes. Yes, I I do. Really? I do. Yeah. >> Look, I mean, I I I I think. [sighs and gasps]. again, and I see this and I see it even. from people that are in our coalition, and this would be my my flip side to the. hawks who have been attacking me or the. president mercilessly over negotiation. I would sort of turn this back on some. of the doves or some of the realists who.

have been attacking the president of the. United States. >> The doves. Those are the peace peace. people. >> Peace people. >> That's what you call them. >> Hawks and doves. You never heard that. phrase? [laughter]. >> I've heard hawks. I've heard hawks. I. don't think I've ever heard doves. >> Hawks and and pigeons. Hawks and I don't. know. >> I think it's more doves. >> Doves is good. Right. So. what what I I think a lot of people I've. heard this argument. >> is is this idea that Donald Trump, you know, was sort of I've even heard. people say he was blackmailed into this.

>> Yeah. >> By the not true, dude. It's just it's. just not true. I've seen the decision-m. up close. Again, whether you agree or. disagree with our negotiation or whether. you agree or disagree with the decision. to launch the campaign epic fury to. begin with, the idea that Donald Trump. is being like back blackmailed is crazy. to me because again, I I see the way. that he makes decisions. I see the way. that he processes this stuff. Like the. idea that he picks up the phone with. anybody and says, "Hey, like I'm going.

to take orders from you." No, that's. just not how Donald Trump operates. Can. you understand though why people would. come to that conclusion especially. because the of the Epstein files? >> What do you mean? >> Well, the Epstein files were supposed to. be released. We were and there was a. tremendous amount of resistance to those. files being released and that concerned. a lot of people cuz if if you're talking. about very wealthy, powerful people that. were engaged in crimes. >> I see. I So you're you're basically. saying like there's a the fear is that.

whatever's in the Epstein files was used. to blackmail like the administration. into doing the Iran thing. >> or at the very least the people that. were involved in the Epstein files that. didn't want them coming out had undue. influence. >> Well. again like say this with all cander like. we absolutely screwed up the comms of. the Epstein files like we just did. But. do I think the reason we screwed up the. comms is because we were trying to hide.

something? No. I think the reason we. screwed up the comms of the Epstein. files is one, you know, Pam said Pam. Bondi said the client list is on my. desk, right? >> Well, see, they had binders. They were. they were sitting in front. >> but those binders were largely documents. that had already been released, right? So, so here's let me try what was the. purpose of that performative display of. the Epstein files and and she was saying. there's tens of thousands of hours of.

film. >> I don't know what the purpose of it was, but I know that the effect of it was to. make people mistrust the entire effort. And I think what I think was happening, look, I I know Pam. I like Pam. I don't. think there was anything malicious going. on. I think Pam was trying to respond to. the political moment. I think she. overstated what we had and what we. didn't have. And I think that she, you. know, got got roasted for it publicly by. a lot of people, including me. Like, you. know, you and I have talked about this a. lot. I'm like one of the OG Epstein.

conspiracy theorists. I've probably gone. down every single rabbit hole. We could. go down uh most of them today. Look, the. original sin of the Epstein. investigation, and obviously I'm biased here, but it. was not what Donald Trump and the. administration did in 2025. It was you. have to go back to 2007208, the original. Alex Aosta investigation of Jeffrey. Epstein where he basically dropped the. federal charges. I think Epstein ended.

up getting prosecuted on some sort of. local thing. But the original warrant, you go to the original warrant back in. 2008. What was he looking for? What was. he allowed to look for? What were they. collecting? It was not looking at a. broader conspiracy. So that happens. Okay. Epstein gets pinched. I think he. goes to prison or maybe this is when he. was on house arrest. Mhm. >> But like anything that existed from the. 80s and 90s up to 2006, 2007, anything.

that existed that we didn't get back. then was disappeared. Right? So like. when people say has has what you've seen. on the inside make you think that the. you know that Epstein never blackmailed. people or that Epstein never engaged in. broader sex trafficking? No, absolutely. not. What I have seen, and I've looked. at most of the files, is that there just. wasn't dispositive evidence. And if that. dispositive evidence ever existed, it. was probably destroyed after 2006, 2007.

Now, look, again, in our defense, yes, was there some, you know, bitching. and moaning and was there some back and. forth? Yes. But there we eventually. collected six million documents as part. of the effort. the president. People say. the president was forced into releasing. the documents. Like again, the idea that. Donald Trump could not have killed that. legislation, especially with the United. States Senate is a joke. He absolutely. could have killed it. What did he do? He. actually said, "Nope, we're going to.

release these files." He thought, you. know, he was annoyed by the story. He. was annoyed by the Democrats accusing. him of doing things bad. By the way, like do I think there is any I've never. seen a single piece of cred credible. evidence that the president of United. States engaged in wrongdoing with minors. ever. So, like when the president says. the hoax, that's what he's talking about. is this democratic idea that he somehow. was a was a pedophile. It's absurd. There's no evidence for it. Now, the. Epstein docu the Epstein, you know, law.

gets signed. We find six million. documents. We find about 3 million of. them are actually responsive has. something to do with the Epstein estate. We release all of them with the. exception of a few things that are like, you know, the courts have said that we. have to redact certain things or we. can't release certain files. But like we. did release all these files. Did it take. longer than it should have taken? Yes. But we did release these files. And. again, the problem here is not.

like. anything that's in the files or not in. the files. The problem is if you go back. to the original investigation, it was. designed in a way that was way too. narrow. If there was a broader. conspiracy and you know, my view is that. there probably was. The evidence that. existed in 2007, that was the. opportunity to get. >> So when you say there probably was a. broader conspiracy, what exactly are you. saying? I think there are a few. different options. I mean, look, man, I. like you could you and I could literally.

do two episodes about this. I've gone on. down every rabbit hole. There's this. funny New York Times story that's. somewhat true, somewhat false, but where. Susie Wilds, the White House chief of. staff, says, "Well, we know JD's a. conspiracy theorist on this." Like, I am. actually. I've I've gone down every. every rabbit hole here. Look, so there's. the theory that whether it was American. intel or foreign intel that Epstein was. sort of using. um Epstein was using sort of the the sex. ring to blackmail rich and powerful.

people. There's that piece of it. You. know, I'm I'm I I think there's a. separate conspiracy that hasn't gotten. covered as much, which is that Epstein. actually, okay, if you go back to to the. original Epstein guy was Les Wexner, okay, who Columbus, Ohio was the. wealthiest person in Ohio, maybe still. is the wealthiest person in the state of. Ohio. The thing that everybody in. Columbus, and I lived there for a time, knew about the Wexner Epstein. relationship is that Epstein was his tax.

guy. that Epstein was like the genius at. identifying weird tax strategies that. would allow you to not have to pay. taxes, but if you were being a little. skeptical would also say that it would. allow Epstein to either blackmail people. or to have a separate nexus of influence. and control on rich and powerful people. And so I think there's an under. reportported underexploited story of is. EP was Epstein like doing a lot of tax.

stuff that was not on the up and up and. is that one way in which he gained. blackmail. It's it's not opposite of the. sexual blackmail story but in some ways. it's it's uh you know you could imagine. both things being true. Um I also just. think there's an element of he was a. scumbag. He was a very sick person. He. built relationships with a lot of other. rich and powerful people who just didn't. have any real moral judgment about the. fact the guy was obviously a scumbag.

And again, to go back to defending. Donald Trump, I know people don't want. to hear this these days, but like who. was the guy? People say Donald Trump was. blackmailed by Jeffrey Epste. Who was. the guy who narked on Epstein to the. Palm Beach police? That's in the Epstein. files, right? >> It was Donald Trump. >> He also kicked him out of Maraago. >> He kicked him out of Mara Lago. It's. just. >> it's obvious that Epstein was a sick. man. >> Yes. But if people want to say we. mishandled the Epstein release, guilty. We did mishandle especially the. communications of it.

>> What do you think should have been done? >> I think that we should have just dropped. everything at the very beginning and. like obviously it takes a little time to. review the stuff, to find the stuff, to. redact things where you have victims and. so forth, but we should have just done. it as quickly as possible. >> But some of the stuff that was redacted, some of the names that were redacted. weren't victims. So yeah, I I I I've looked into this and. my understanding of this having looked. at a lot of this but not all of it is. that it is sometimes hard to draw a.

distinction between victim and. co-conspirator and like let me highlight. this in a very sort of obvious way. Ro. Kana, who's been one of the most one of. the loudest voices on the Epstein file. Well, he became very loud on the Epstein. files the minute Donald Trump became. president. Didn't seem to care about it. during the Biden administration. He. actually brought one of the Epstein. victims, I think, to the State of the. Union last year, or maybe it was the. year before last. Well, like that. victim, and I'm not accusing, I'm not. saying she wasn't a victim. Uh I don't. know anything about her particular case.

She was also listed as a co-conspirator. in some of these documents. Right? So. there's an idea that some of the people. who were engaged in the sex trafficking. were also, you know, facilitating it as. well. >> So they were incentivized to get more. girls. >> Yeah. But but what I but yes, that's. right. But the the idea is that it's. it's hard to sort of it's sometimes a. little bit of a gray area between, you. know, some of the people who were. alleged victims were also alleged. co-conspirators. And so what DOJ tried. to do was kind of make that judgment as.

best they could and release as much as. possible. But it's clear that he was. trying to get in contact with people. that he felt were influential. It was. clear that he was trying to get people. to get together on the island and meet. at parties. So there there was something. he was doing where he was trying to. either influence people or compromise. people. >> Correct. >> So it's not there's some sort of an. operation that was going on. There there.

is a story there and. you know I I will go to my deathbed. believing there's a story there but I. can't prove it and I I promise you. there's not some document that at least. I'm hiding that allows us to prove. exactly what was going on and how. >> he was he was also trying to get. scientists and this is one of the. reasons supposedly why he got that. >> okay so. >> branch in New Mexico. So, so a friend of. mine has this element, sorry, I should. step back. Conspiracy theories. One of. the ways you discredit conspiracy.

theory, I thought about this a lot, is. try to hide it. Another way you. discredit conspiracy theories by. flooding the zone. So, one of the things. I've tried to do when looking at all. this stuff is to try to understand sort. of where it fits in and and to, you. know, try to separate the real from the. fake. But one really interesting element. of the whole Jeffrey Epstein saga, okay, so he dies in 2019, right? This is at. the very end of of the first Trump. administration. His death coincides.

very very closely. This is not my. observation. This is a friend, but I. don't want to, you know, reveal. confidences here. Re it coincides very. closely with the end of what you might. call the era of censorship in academia. So back in 2019 2020 we reached sort of. peak academic censorship where people. wouldn't publish a medical study because. it might have sort of disparited impact. racial undertones or people were getting. fired from academia for not doing land. acknowledgements stuff like that. Okay,

I'm not saying that stuff has completely. gone away but Epstein we know was. funding a ton of scientists. By the way, where did his money come from? He was. funding a ton of scientists but like. when he died. it's almost like the era of censorship. started to break because he wasn't just. he was also plugged into a lot of in. academia but also you know he's plugged. into the social media companies like. this is a dude who knew everybody he. knew everybody. >> so. look. >> so where did his money come from? Well,

from given um part of it is suspect tax. advice and uh setting up tax schemes for. a lot of very very rich people, >> right? But why was he motivated to. influence. academia and what what what was the. purpose? >> I don't know the answer to that. question. I mean, I I have theories. There's there's of course the. >> Well, most people think he was MSAD. >> Yeah. Assad or CIA or some other deep. state, whether in America or Israel or.

another country or or both. Um, >> you know, look, was he he clearly had. connections to the upper the highest. levels of American intelligence? He. clearly had connections to the highest. levels of Israeli intelligence. In fact, one of the interesting story, one of the. interesting things the Epstein saga. reveals about and and I try to make this. point is one of the reasons why I'm. always careful and I say there are some. elements within the Israeli government. who don't like our peace process because.

there are a lot of elements within the. Israeli government that actually do like. our peace process. They recognize that. this indefinite campaign is not good for. them either. And and the Epstein thing. is interesting because as much as I. know, you know, Prime Minister. Netanyahu, not a particularly popular. person in the United States of America. right now, Epstein seemed to be connected to the. elements of the Israeli deep state that. were left of center. Like I've always. found that fascinating. It wasn't like. he was super connected to the right of.

center of Israeli politics. America, he. was connected across the board. like he. had Republican friends, he had. Democratic friends, he had much deeper. connections to the Israeli left of. center than right of center. I don't. know what that means. I always. >> hanging out with Steve Bannon and Nam. Chosky. >> Exactly. He had again in America he had. friends across the political spectrum in. a way he didn't necessarily have in. Israel. >> I had one of my guests try to get me to. meet him. >> Really?

>> Yeah. >> When? >> 2017. See, that that's crazy to me because at. that point he'd already gone down for at. least one like sex abuse thing. >> That was my possession. [laughter]. >> I'll show you the emails. Okay. It's. kind They're kind of funny. I actually. read them on stage. >> You want to say Okay, fine. >> You people could find it. >> Yeah. >> I don't want to have the guy the guy's. already ruined. >> Sure. >> But um but [clears throat] it's. >> I Googled it and I'm I'm like what the. are you talking about? >> See, but this goes back to my original. point. >> This is part of what he was doing,

right? He wanted to get influential. people. >> But you go back to the original 2007. warrant on Jeffrey Epstein. >> Uhhuh. >> All of the really crazy happened. from the '9s to 2007. That's when he was. at the peak of his power. That's when he. hadn't yet gone down on a sex abuse. scandal. Like it's your point, right? Even if you have some scumbags who were. willing to introduce him to Joe Rogan in. 2017, there are a lot of Joe Rogan, or. at least some who are going to say, "Wait a second. I'm gonna Google this.

guy and find out that he's a predator. A. lot. A lot didn't. >> That was really crazy. >> A lot didn't, but some did. And my point. is that would limit his influence. >> But if you go back to like the 1990s, the early 2000s, that is the stuff I think that is like. the black hole of the Epstein saga. We. don't have nearly enough from that era. And. >> it was destroyed. I think we had a. prosecution that explicitly was so. narrow that whatever existed would not.

have even been caught up. >> Right. So, they were specifically going. after him for underage sex and they. didn't look at the full picture of the. operation. >> They didn't even try to they didn't even. try to. >> Well, that was one of the things about. the prosecutor was told that he was. above their pay grade. I mean, it was. one of the things that he. >> said he [clears throat] was like CIA or. something, right? He said he was told he. was intelligent, >> right? And yes, I've asked were there. like. were there documents connecting Jeffrey.

Epstein directly to our intelligence. agencies or anybody else's? And the. answer is no. But if that existed, it wouldn't exist in 2026. >> What is it like being the vice. president? Like how much access do you. have to information? [laughter]. >> Because. >> so I'll give you another conspiracy. So. I have like effectively unlimited access. to information. >> Unlimited. But I think that the. one of the things that I've learned. about the job is it's you're doing so. much on the day-to-day like you're.

calling senators and trying to get them. to pass a piece of legislation. You're. meeting with staff about what should go. in the housing bill. You're negotiating. with the Iranians or the cutteries or. the Israelis about something that's. going on in the Middle East. And a lot of it like the UFO thing like. I I've said that I'm going to like I'm. going to look into the UFO thing and. I've been saying that for a year and a. half and I haven't done it yet because I. haven't had the time. And so some of. this is like you just have to have the. time to actually punch through the walls.

and to like go to the gatekeepers and. say you have to open up that gate. because I'm the vice president. And some. of it is just hard to actually get to. because I don't have the time to sort of. focus on that one issue for any. particular period of time. So the answer. is you have unlimited access to. information. The constraint is not. people tell me no. The constraint is. you're just so busy doing other. The UFO thing I think would be something. that I would want to pursue. >> Yes.

>> I I mean just for my own personal. information I would want to know what is. going on. >> Correct. So the question is, are these. um special access programs that are. above top secret and that this is our. own stuff or is this something that's. far more bizarre and something that is. interdimensional from another planet? Whatever fill in the blank. >> Yeah. Is it foreign? And if it's. foreign, is it 6,000 mi away or like. 6,000 light years away?

>> Right. >> Yes. >> Right. And that is that is I will answer. that question eventually. >> Really? >> Yes. I'll get to the bottom of it. >> How how are you going to have the time. to do that? Like what what will be. eventually I'll have like a few weeks. where I can just sit down and worry. about that problem. You said something. that I thought was very bizarre. >> Here's here's the interesting thing. though. I will say. that is one of those conspiracy theories. that.

there are a lot of people in our. government who are interested in this, meaning our current political leadership. who are interested in this question. And. it hasn't like nothing has really. happened yet, which. makes me a little bit less interested in. it cuz there are a lot of people with. access to those files and access to that. information and nothing has changed. since Biden left office, which which. makes me think other people have looked. into it and they just haven't. necessarily found something. But anyway, I I eventually I promise you I'm gonna. like sit down and spend a couple of.

weeks trying to figure out what's in. these files. Actually, haven't done it. yet. >> You said something that I thought was. very odd. >> Okay. >> You said that you thought that they were. demons. >> Okay. I did say that. >> What did you mean by that? Well, [sighs and gasps]. I. first of all there not just in. Christianity but in a number of world. religions. there are a number of like.

you know mystical things that happened. extradimensional. extra like I I I'm not one of these. people who's like a hyperrationalist. like I I think that there are things. happening in the world that we're not. always seeing. I you know I believe in. God. But I think that there is a kind of. what's what's the word I'm looking for? Not extra real. >> supernatural. >> Supernatural. There are supernatural. things that are happening. Okay. So if. you look historically.

at, you know, things that are similar to. the alien phenomenon. where oh some like strange being. It. kind of looks like a human being but. doesn't look like but but not human and. it shows a particular interest in human. beings and then it takes the human. beings and you know like does weird. experiments on them. I think my argument. is that's either right? You're. either talking to a crazy person, which. I don't like. I'm not saying just. because I believe in the supernatural.

doesn't believe mean I believe in. everything supernatural. But if we're. talking about an extraterrestrial. being that is humanlike but not human. that contains effectively infinite. powers and is torturing human beings, you can call it an alien if you want, but I think there's a lot of historical. precedent to call that a demon. >> Well, a lot of these uh stories and. these accounts, >> we have one right here on the.

>> demonic. Yeah, that's the mothership. logo. >> [laughter]. >> Um, a lot of these uh accounts are not. of. beings being or people being tortured. They're people that are being exposed to. information like the Travis Walton. stories of very famous case uh from the. 1970s. >> Read about it on the way back though. >> It's this guy right here. I got a Travis. Walton followed. [laughter] He's one of. the most famous uh UFO abduction. stories. >> Okay. There was a movie um with DB.

Cooper in the uh. >> and like what is the information that. they gave Travis Waldman? >> Was DB Cooper the that was the. >> DB Sween. >> DB Sweeney DB Cooper was the guy who. stole the money and jumped out of the. plane. Um Fire in the Sky there's a a. movie. >> of course. Yeah, I remember this movie. I don't think I ever saw it though. >> 1993. Good movie but sensational and and. Travis Walton says they made a bunch of. up and that's not what happened. But. >> yeah, >> the story was that he was uh a logger in.

Arizona uh and he was uh leaving a job. They were all together in a truck and. these uh these loggers saw this thing, this light uh land in this uh forest and. they went to go investigate. He jumps. out of the truck and he gets close to it. and he's hit by some beam of light and. knocked to the ground. Uh they take off. and then they realize like we've got to. go back. we don't know what's going on. Like they turn around, they go back to.

get him. They They're freaked out and. panicked. They go back to get him. He's. gone. Uh the police interview them. They. think that they killed him. They they. you know, there's an investigation. 5. days later, he shows up uh wearing the. same clothes. Um and he has this crazy. story. And uh he had been in this. spaceship for five days is what he said. And that they had fixed him. They healed. him and then they had communicated with. him telepathically and he had had this.

very bizarre encounter with these um. these beings that aren't from here or if. they are from here they're very. different than us. >> Okay. So I guess my my response to that. would be extra powerful beings in this. case communicating telepathically. helping people. sounds like an angel. So, I guess my. point here here's let me let me make the. like the the steelman version of my. argument. >> It's that. >> okay.

>> my dog. there's no real difference between me. and and God to my dog. I can literally. walk into a room and turn the light on. I can make food appear instantaneously. I can transport myself across time and. space very, very rapidly. If you're a. human being with intelligence but not. supernatural intelligence, I I guess my. point is again, this could all be. This could all be fake. That's. a possibility. But if it's real, is. there really a meaningful difference.

between an angel or a demon and a space. alien with super technology? I just to. our perception, they would largely just. look like the same thing. >> I think we're capable of nuance. We're. capable of understanding that human. beings are far more complex and evolved. than chimpanzees. And we could imagine a. world where if we don't blow ourselves. up and there's not a nuclear bomb and. there's not a we don't get hit by an. asteroid, if we live another million.

years that we would have technology. that's indistinguishable from magic. >> Right. >> Exactly. That's that's. angels and demons. It just means they're. hyper evolved advanced civilizations. from somewhere else. >> And what I'm saying is the perception of. those beings to a more simple. intelligence. >> Sure. >> There's not a meaningful there's not a. meaningful difference. So you're you're.

asking you're like talking about what it. is that these things actually are. And I. guess what I'm talking about is how. would a human being with my level of. intelligence or your level of. intelligence in 2026 understand what's. going on, >> right? But from a biblical perspective, there's a very big difference between a. demon and a a hyper intelligent being. from somewhere else. >> [sighs]. >> I mean, a demon or a hyper intelligent. malicious. >> If if demons are real, if there really.

are dark forces in the universe, and. they're disembodied dark forces, these. things that exist, these. >> Yes. >> And then there's also powerful light. forces in the universe. >> that that they don't have to be mutually. exclusive to the the concept of. hyperintelligent other species. Absolutely. >> When you're looking at an insanely vast. universe, I don't think they have to be, but I think that. it is interesting to me that for most of.

human history, we would have understood supernatural, hyper powerful, hyper knowledgeable. things as sort of celestial or. celestial. Thought. >> of a cell phone as being sorcery. I. mean, it doesn't that doesn't mean it's. sorcery. [laughter]. >> Maybe it's not. Maybe it's just. technology. I just it that argument. doesn't make any sense to me.

>> Well, >> and this is not discounting the. possibility of demons or discounting the. possibility of angels. >> Well, I guess I understand your point. conceptually. I don't dis actually. disagree with it. So, I don't think. we're saying something different that. you know metaphysically there could be. two separate things going on. There. could be celest there could be extra. earth outside of earth space aliens and. there could also be angels and demons. These these could be two totally. separate things. One could be true and.

not the other. That's I I I totally. concede and agree with that point. I. guess what I'm saying is. it's a distinction that is conceptually. interesting to me. But if a space alien. with like superhuman technology comes to. the earth and has malicious intent, I don't know how I'm supposed to tell. the difference between that and the. demon. >> if they have malicious intent. But I. mean, isn't that also the case with. visiting people, right? Like you you.

could have a country and you get visited. by the Peace Corps or you get visited by. pirates. >> Yeah. >> You know, and are the pirates demons? Is. the Peace Corps angels? No, but I think. we're talking about something much. different. >> Are we talking about something. different? We're talking about a hyper. advanced version of that. >> We're we're talking about I mean, as I. understand it, we're talking about. things that exist outside the United. States. Sorry, outside of the Earth.

Okay. And two different types of beings. that could exist outside I mean, okay, maybe. >> there's a lot of people, you know, Tim. Bashette thinks that they're they're. here. >> There's Atlantis or there's something. else. that they're they're somehow or. another they're survivors of a of. longgone civilization that live under. the ocean. >> Yeah, >> it's just as kooky as living. >> Here's here's the way I would put it is. like there's also a difference between a. demon and a ghost, right? These things. are two very different conceptual. things, >> right? But if I'm a human being and I. meet a malicious ghost, maybe I think.

it's a demon. And and maybe all I'm. saying is maybe there's some. there's some point at which the. conceptually interesting this is such a. weird conversation. at which point the. conceptually interesting discussion of. what it is is separate from how it. appears to me and how I'm going to. understand it as a human being in my. particular social and cultural context. in 2026. But if you're looking for me to. concede the point that there is.

something different or could be. something different between an angel, a. demon, a space alien, a a supernatural. but non any of those other things. beings. Yes, I concede that. >> Yeah. The the question is what does. what do these special access programs. like what is the information that's. available like how. >> my understanding is David Brush and a. lot of these other people that there. have been crash retrieval programs. >> Okay. And I've I've so I've talked to.

Dave before. I think I called him. actually after he was on your podcast. Um, so. there's like the crash retrieval stuff. of whether that's that's real or not, where is it, etc. There's the videos, right? There are all of these videos, some of which have been released and. declassified, that seem to me show some. pretty weird stuff. And then there might. be other pieces of evidence as well. I'm. not saying there is or isn't. I just. don't know. I I try to keep an open mind. about this stuff. All I'm saying is I'm. fascinated by it. I don't have like some.

secret sauce, at least not yet, that. tells me what's true and what's false. I'm just saying this is something that. I'm interested in. But it doesn't it's. it's because it's it's like anything in. life where do I have to figure this out. this week? No. So, I'm going to do the. things that I have to like negotiate. with the Iranians and try to get this. bill passed. >> So, let's imagine a world where the. Iranian negotiations go swimmingly. >> [laughter]. >> Everything's done. God willing. You.

know, all these Gulf Arab states decide, hey, let's invest money in Iran. Let's. change hearts and minds. Okay. Avoided a gigantic apocalyptic. scenario. What What could be done? Like. if we have information, who who has this. information and why are they holding on. to this information? And what do you. know the the how put off story? >> No. So how put off who used to work for. NASA um said that he was brought in.

during the Bush administration where um. they were going they they were proposing. uh disclosure and they were saying this. is what we're they were saying they're. saying we have biological remains and we. have physical crafts we're proposing. disclosure and they brought in a bunch. of a bunch of uh thought leaders uh. different disciplines different schools. of thought and they said I want you to.

compile a list of pros and cons and put. a numerical value on what how this is. going to affect society how is this. going to affect religion how's this. going to affect government how's this. going to affect economy all these. different things and when they compiled. this list every one of them had more in. the con than in the pro and they decided. against disclosure because of that. >> now if that's the case, what are we. talking about? Like, who has this.

information and what is this. information? I mean, if that wasn't just. a thought experiment, >> yeah, >> if they weren't really just with. these people, which I don't understand. why they would do that, but let's assume. they what is known. >> and why would they prevent that. information from getting out? >> Well, that's. that's a big if. >> Have you seen the movie The Age of. Disclosure? >> I have not. >> Okay. Well, a lot of people um including. intelligence officers, different people.

in the government are in this. documentary. And one of the things that. they're saying is part of the problem. with all this is if they have had these. programs going on for so long, that. means they've been misappropriating. funds and they've been lying to. Congress. So all these people that were. involved in I've heard this argument. Yeah, I've heard this argument. Yeah. So. Lulu Alzando and all these other people. have said, "Look, what we're gonna need. is mass amnesty for people that are. involved in this. It's the only way. you're ever really going to get to the. bottom of it.".

>> Problem with that is if you've got. unlimited money and you've got. misappropriation of funds and lying to. Congress, I guarantee. some of that money has gone to places it. shouldn't have gone. >> 100% 100%. >> Like it always does. >> Yeah. Yeah. So, like it's always very. hard to engage in these like super. generic super general I should say. hypotheticals because. you know like yeah if if look we've got. remains of space aliens and we're hiding.

them then there are a million other sort. of there are a million possibilities for. that what would explain it how it would. have happened I am skeptical that's true. and the reason I'm skeptical that it's. true that we have the physical remains. is not because I don't think that's. something that like is physically. possible or that the government like the. government's willing to do and able to. do a lot of a lot of crazy stuff in our. history and the history of all. governments. I am skeptical of the competence. I.

actually made this point to Dave when we. talked and I I think he's a very. interesting guy. Um so I don't mean to. insult him or say I disagree with him. about everything, but I made this point. to Dave when we talked. It's like if we. have literal space alien remains in the. custody of the United States government, there is no way that that wouldn't get. leaked that wouldn't leak out in some. way. >> Well, it has leaked out anecdotally. >> Well, that's I guess that's the. counterargument, but I think it would. Jackie Gleason story. >> No, I want to hear that. But but like.

with cell phones and every way that we. have like it's plausible to me you could. hide that in an era where you have to. have a giant camera the size of these. antlers in order to take a photo of. something. But dude I can take you know. like you have cameras now that are like. literally this tiny. That's the part. that I'm skeptical of that we're hiding. that. Let me push back against that cuz. you know that if you have any sort of. top secret like if you go into a skiff. >> like there's no way you're bringing.

cameras in there. You're you're Look, when I came here to this podcast studio, [laughter]. they had a dog my trunk and it's your. studio. >> Pop my trunk. Yeah. >> Like I'm going to blow up my own studio. >> Yeah. But okay. So you know what I'm. saying? But the Okay. The. counter-argument though is they check. that stuff on you. They don't check that. stuff on everybody. >> Everybody here. They did. >> Everybody here. But I'm saying all you. need all you need is one official with. like the highest security clearance. Now, okay, you're right. Certain devices.

like give eminate signals that they can. pick up on Bluetooth and all that. but like but to have access to go into a. room where they have these things. If. they did have these things, I guarantee. you they're going to make sure no one's. got anything. They could easily scan you. to make sure that you don't have any. kind of electronics, any kind of camera, any kind of recording device. >> That's not hard. >> I mean, >> especially if you've got something. squirreled away at Area 51. >> In the next two and a half years, we're.

going to run this experiment cuz I got. two and a half more years as VP. And I. swear to you, if there are little green. men like body remains, >> text me, please. >> Well, I'm not going to No, [laughter]. I'm not going to text you. I'm going to. try to smuggle a camera and get a photo. of these things. [laughter] Well, how. would you, the vice president of the. United States of America, have to have a. camera smuggled in to do that? >> Well, maybe I wouldn't, but again, I. I've seen it. >> Do you think that you have the kind of. authority like look, let's imagine you. find out that at Wright Patterson Air. Force Base, they have some.

secure facility somewhere. Maybe it's. not there. Maybe it's maybe they've kept. it under wraps. Maybe it's in the. mountain somewhere. Yeah. >> And you find out that this thing exists. Do you think it's as simple as you could. just go out and tell everybody or do you. think that you get briefed on the. implications of what would happen if you. disclosed all this information? >> Well, I would definitely get briefed on. the implications of what would happen. >> and they would probably tell you, hey, you have to people. >> Yeah, but dude, I'm not uh. >> You're not going to people?

>> I Well, look, I have I have many skills. as a politician in some vices, but like. one of them is I'm just not a a good. liar. >> Well, then they're not going to show it. to you. You [laughter] just up. You just up on this podcast by. saying that. what I. >> show it to the ladies on the view. That's [laughter] that's. >> that's right. >> The intellectual leaders of our world. >> Trust me, they show it to the ladies of. the view. It will be said two hours two. hours later. Anyway, maybe they show it. to them just so that no one will believe. it. >> I do want to look into this stuff. I'm. just telling you.

I have not yet seen the evidence that we. have. Certainly extraterrestrial. remains, but there's a lot of stuff. before extraterrestrial remains is also. interesting. Like the flight patterns in. some of these videos are super weird. >> Um, >> well, the Commander David Fraver stuff. is bananas. It goes from 50,000 ft above. sea level to sea level in like a second. >> to what people say, right? Like because. one of the arguments I've heard, for. example, is, you know, could this just. be a visual or on the camera or. something like that. Okay, that that.

sounds to me plausible. I'm not an. expert in cameras, but then what the. pilots their reaction to it, it's not. like they're looking at a visual lure on. a camera. It's like they're looking at. something else that's really, really. weird and difficult to explain given. what they know about, you know, physics. and aeronautical engineering, etc. So, anyway, I am fascinated by this, but I. just don't want to tell people like, oh, I've uncovered the the truth or I. haven't because I haven't looked at it. yet. >> Right. Well, I would, if I was you, that. would be the first thing I did. storm right in there and go, >> "Let's talk about tax policy.".

[laughter]. >> Is that what you want to talk about? No, >> we could talk about tax policy. >> Way more interesting. >> Um, I would want to know. I mean, I. think the world wants to know. I think. it would fundamentally change our. understanding of what it means to be a. living organ. >> Okay. What do you think? Like what is. your you know more about this than I do. >> I don't think we're alone. >> But okay. >> I don't think we're alone. I just don't. understand what it is. >> Okay. I don't know if it's. >> So, you don't have like a strong view. about what it is. You're just.

>> curious. I don't have any data, right? So, I don't have any proof. So, I I. believe Commander David Fraver, I. believe Ryan Graves, he was a fighter. pilot. They said that when they upgraded. their um their equipment on these. fighter jets in 2014, all of a sudden. they started seeing these things that. were staying completely motionless at. 120 knot winds and they were a cube. inside of a sphere, a black cube inside. of some sort of.

>> Yeah. Well, okay. So, this is a I know. you've talked to Eric Weinstein. Yes. And um you know, I haven't talked to you. about this lately, but one of the things. that Eric sort of kind of persuaded me. of a couple of years ago was. >> it's Weinstein. They get very sensitive. >> Weinstein. >> Okay. U got it. Eric Weinstein. Good. [laughter] thought. Speaking of pedophiles, I guess Harvey. was a pedophile. He was He was He had. many sins, but not that one. >> Candace Owens says he's innocent. >> Oh, interesting. Okay. [laughter]. >> Or not um.

>> not guilty of everything that they said. he was. So, okay, Eric Weinstein, this is probably. three, four years ago, persuades me of. this actually. Not, it's an interesting. theory. His his argument is in the same. way that I would say, what's the. difference between an extraterrestrial. and an angel or a demon depending on its. intentions from the perspective of a. human in 2026? His argument would be. what's the difference between a space. alien and a human being but just a human.

being with super advanced technology, right? >> And so I don't know if this is still his. view, but he kind of was he was like, let's say you had human beings who just. were super scientifically advanced. Like. what we know of the laws of physics as I. understand it is that light speed is. sort of the upper limit of what one of. our spaceships could travel. Okay? You. can't go any faster than the speed of. light. Well, that's a problem because. everything else that could support of. extraterrestrial life is much is many.

many many many light years away. Okay. So his argument to me again back in the. day was if you figured out a new physics. in the same way that you had an. understanding shift from Newtonian. physics to Einsteinian physics. If you. have a new understanding of physics that. allows you to travel much faster than. the speed of light, you could just have. human beings either from a different. planet or maybe they went to Mars and. started their own civilization and then. that you know that that got old and they. at this point they are many millions of.

light years away but they can move. through space and time in a way that is. quite literally like divine from our. perspective or space aliens but they're. just human beings. It could be human. beings from the future. >> If time travel is possible, why? >> But it also it also we know that life. exists on Earth. So if life exists on. Earth, the Earth is a planet. There are. hundreds of billions of stars that have. hundreds [snorts] of billions of.

planets. >> We have no idea how many planets there. are in the known universe that could. potentially support life. And if these. things live on these planets and they. live far longer than we have, like if. you showed. a nuclear bomb to someone from a hundred. years ago, they would say, "That's the. craziest thing I've ever seen in. my life." You show them a show them a. reactor, show them a cell phone, show. them that television. >> It's like my dog with a light switch. Right. >> Just be able to FaceTime someone in New.

Zealand. Like, how what is that? What. are you doing? >> That's right. now advance that forward. one million years and then you know. instead of using propulsion you are. instead manipulating space time. >> So I so that's exactly right and one of. the things I've talked with Elon about. this and Elon is obviously a super smart. dude but I I've never heard like a super. satisfying answer to this. One of the. things that worries me like I I want. humans to be a multilanetary species. I.

want us to go to Mars and set up a. colony. And you know, like that that's. sort of I love humanity. I want it to. continue. And. the problem with with space travel that. I have again not heard a satisfactory. solution to is, you know, when we're. outside of the Earth's gravity, our genes, like our our our actual DNA. seems to not function as well when it's. not on Earth style gravity, which makes. sense, right? we developed.

>> in these conditions with this gravity. >> So whenever you have somebody who goes. to the international space station for. like three months or six months and they. come back and they are totally jacked up. because like literally the cells in. their body are starting to like. discombobulate in response to a. lowgravity environment. >> I don't like we have to figure out a. solution to that problem. that that to. me is sort of the most interesting part. of space travel of going to Mars or. setting up a colony on another planet is. if you set up a colony on Mars but and.

what it takes you like two years to get. there and two years to get back or. something like that, right? >> But in that time you've gone from a. functioning adult healthy to like dead. if you're in space for four years. that. that that part of space travel is very. fascinating to me and I I don't know. that I've heard any satisfactory. solution to it yet. >> I don't think conventionally there is a. satisfactory solution. But. >> if you're talking about manipulating. spaceime and not traditional propulsion, >> you probably could figure that out.

>> You could manipulate [laughter] you. could essentially contain this. environment in exactly the same way it. is. Yeah. And travel to somewhere else. with that environment. So this is the. idea of them living under the surface of. the the ocean. >> I see. I see. How can they live in the. depths of the ocean? Well, because they. have a completely contained environment. >> Sure. Sure. >> I mean, who knows? >> Yeah. >> It's all just nonsense. >> Maybe they figured out how I can eat. like steak and grater ice cream and have. the blood profile of eating, you know,

chicken and salad. >> Well, I don't think chicken and salad is. the way to go. I'm a steak guy. I think. uh just eat a little bit of ice cream. every now and then. By the way, ice. cream is one of the very best desserts. for you because it contains fat. >> It's got a lot of fat and protein. That's right. That's right. >> A little bit of sugar, but it's all uh. it's a moderation thing. >> That's right. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Well, >> anybody who want to eat ice cream is a. communist. [laughter]. >> There's nothing wrong with ice cream. Ice cream. Speaking of communist, >> the Democratic Socialists of America,

that's actually what they do at their. events is they throw the ice cream into. the Boston Harbor instead of the tea. >> Ah, yeah. Those people scare me. >> [laughter]. >> I I'm really concerned that people think. that's a good idea and that they think. that socialism just hasn't been done. correctly. >> That drives me nuts cuz I think a lot of. like really well-intentioned, really. kind and empathetic young people think. that that's the way to go. And I do not. think they understand the dangers of.

this ideology because it always leads to. one thing. It leads to a very powerful. military government that controls the. population. Period. End of discussion. And if you if you play it out, it is. literally the only way that can get. people to give up their money. Yes. It's. the only way they can get them to give. up their property. And when you're. hearing like Mum Donnie talk about. freezing rents and taking bad landlords. and then confiscating their property,

you're like, >> do you This is step one of [snorts]. what's happened in every communist. dictatorship throughout history. This is. what happened in North Korea. Give the. government the land and we'll make sure. that no one ever has to worry about. food. What a great idea. Look how it. turned out. So uh I don't I don't know. who said this but you know the whole. argument of communism is that you seize. the means of production but because the. means of production the most powerful. means of production is the human mind.

you ultimately have to get into. totalitarianism. You have to have. control of that most fundamental element. of of the human person. >> You also take away motivation and. there's a thing that people don't like. which is extreme wealth. But you have to. understand that if it wasn't for the. motivation of extreme wealth, you would. not have an iPhone. >> So here's. >> wouldn't have these things. >> Okay. So here's here's let me give you. my uh my my Christian answer to this. And it's a good plug for my my new book, Communion, Finding My Way Back to Faith,

>> not to be confused with Whitley Strive's. book, Communion, which is all about. aliens. Okay. Did you know that? >> No. In coincidence, Joe. Pull up. Pull. up the the the pull up the cover. Pull. up the cover of the good drivers. all. your listeners to buy. >> The problem is like you didn't know. about this book. I would have told you. to come up with a different title. >> Seriously. book. >> There we go. Okay. So, we want that is. wild. >> And then there's another one. My first. communion. It's about. >> Okay. That's like a kids book. But yeah, we want people to buy the second one.

The one that says JD Vance on it. But. okay. So this is one of the things I. talk about in the book is like there's a. there is a Christian idea of political. economy that's actually been lost in. American politics where it's it's like. we think of it as libertarianism, the. hardcore free market versus socialism or. communism. And there actually is a third way that. has existed in pretty much all Christian. economic thinking going back 2,000 years. ago, which is that yeah, extreme wealth.

inequality does create problems, but you. still got to have private property. You. still have to have a state that protects. private property rights. And there's a. way to balance these things that I think. we've sort of lost in our in our country. a little bit. And when I when I like, okay, let me play devil's advocate with. with the DSA because I think that their. ideas are crazy and I think that you're. right. They will lead to a very. totalitarian place. I'm not defending a. single thing that they say, particularly. their hatred of ice cream. What I am. what I [snorts] am saying is.

I and and maybe this is just sort of the. way my mind works. I tend to be a little. bit more empathetic. Why are young. people attracted to socialism in 21st. century America? One of the best. interviews that Charlie Kirk ever gave, it was right before he died. It was an. episode that he did with Tucker Carlson. where he talked about the fact that if. you don't give young people a stake, if. you don't give them ownership, if you. don't give them a sense of the American. dream and of possibility in the future, they're going to become socialists.

Like, if if you have a zero sum. environment for a 25-year-old in this. country, they're going to start to say, "The only way for me to get anything is. to take away from somebody else." So we. have to get away from like the zero sum. thinking. I think that's like the root. cause of this. But I I also think that. look we've ran an experiment in the. United States of America and you know I. think that we have we have undone that. experiment taken in a different. direction in the Trump administration. where ship all the factories overseas. and let low-wage foreigners make our.

stuff. That was a bad deal for American. workers. Again, it takes a long time to. reverse that trend, but I think it's one. of the best parts of Trump. administration policy is you do see that. trend starting to reverse. This idea. that nobody should own anything. We. should all become renters, whereas what. we're trying to do is lowest lower. interest rates. You actually have seen. housing costs stabilize in the country. over the last year and a half, frankly, because of immigration. We had way too. many people going after way too many. homes. You close the border. This is one. of the reasons why rent and housing.

costs have stabilized a little bit. So, I think that unless you go down that. pathway of allowing young Americans to. own something, socialism is the. inevitable outcome. Do I think that's. good? No. But I I really do worry, and I. I see this frankly more in my own party. than I do on the other side. There is. this revulsion to socialism that's. totally justified without enough. thinking about how did we get here in. the first place. And if man if we don't. fix that and I I would say if we don't.

get back to a more Christian sort of. understanding of of economics socialism. is the alternative like that that is. where this goes. People don't own. anything rigged. >> Exactly. And in some ways Joe the game. is rigged. >> Yes. the I mean if if you look at. >> I mean again I I just I think so much of. housing because. you know this happened I think it was. during the presidential campaign maybe. it was right before but I was I was.

talking to some family members over. Thanksgiving and you know just a sort of. a younger friend of of my wife's they. were like five or six years behind us. they were just about to get married and. this this young woman successful. engineer makes a higher salary than most. Americans. She just sort of like tossed. out there that, you know, when her. parents' generation was coming up, it. was like possible to own a house and to. raise a family and not be worried that. much about things. And my thought was,

okay, you're an engineer. You make way. more money than 75% of people your age, maybe 90% of people your age, and you. think that it is like this ridiculous. unachievable objective to have literally. what your parents had, which is a decent. job, a nice house, and a and a safe. place like at that literally that same. that same dinner like another guy. another friend of my wife was talking. about this and he you know South Indian. family grew up you know his parents. immigrated he was born and raised in San.

Diego and he was like you know when I. was growing up in Oceanside. This is. like a suburb of San Diego where there a. lot of Marines live in Oceanside. It's. close to Camp Pendleton. Said when I was. growing up, all of my like the kids that I played. with that I rode bo bikes with, that I. was, you know, playing street hockey. with and football with, all of those. kids were the sons of enlisted Marines. in Oceanside, California. And then we. went and looked at like Oceanside, California rents. Again, this is a. couple years ago, rents and housing.

prices. Like every house was north of a. million dollars on the street this guy. grew up in. And listen, Marine, frankly, most Marine officers could not afford to. buy a million-dollar house. So, like, does the socialism thing scare me? Yes. Is it the wrong solution? Yes. But one. thing I try to persuade my fellow. Republicans of is socialism is the. alternative if we don't have a pathway. to give people a sense that the system. is not rigged and that the American. dream is attainable. That's like our. job. That's what we have to do. I'm not.

saying Rome was built in a day. It's not. going to be easy to undo some of these. economic trends. But man, we ran the. experiment. We ran the experiment of. offshoring all of our industrial jobs, of becoming a services and finance. economy and allowing Wall Street to come. in and buy every asset of modern life. and turn it into an investable, you. know, line goes up asset. And what has. that done? It's created a generation of. kids who kind of are attracted to.

socialism. >> We have to fix that problem. >> Well, kids that do feel, and you're. correct, and I I I agree with you, the. system is rigged. Kids feel like there. are no options other than to burn it. down. Yes. And that's the problem. because they feel very frustrated. >> And this is part of our job is to. provide an option that isn't burn it. down, but is not just doing the same. things that we've done for the past. But. they're also terrified about the future. because of AI because they feel like. jobs are going to be taken away and. there will be no place for people that.

have education in very specific [snorts]. avenues like very specific jobs are. going to just be irrelevant. >> Yeah. >> They're going to be completely wiped out. by AI. >> There is a huge fear over this. So I let. me kind of give my own my own spin on. this. >> Yes. I was talking to a CEO not of an AI. company but of a tech company and he's. one of the few CIO CEOs that's sort of. right or center and I was like well you. know what do you think do you think AI. is going to come and take all the jobs.

and his basic take was the the real. historical analogy is the industrial. revolution and you know did the. industrial revolution displace or change. a lot of jobs yes it also created a lot. of jobs that didn't exist before so he. was like my concern here is not that 50%. of Americans are going to be unable to. find a job. There will be some. displacement, some sort of churn in the. labor market, but that's not the main. issue. He said the main issue, if you go. back to the industrial revolution, is.

that there was a lot of demand for. workers, but the inequality in the. country got completely out of whack. Like this is the era of the robber. barons. And then the robber barons in. both Europe and the United States led to. fascism. It led to communism again to. this point about giving people an. option. if you don't give them a good. option, then it leads to fascism and. communism. >> Now, there's this fascinating encyclical. um written by by Pope Leo I 13th. I'll. send it to you. It's one of the the best. things that I think has ever been. written by a Christian leader where it's.

it's written in the late 19th century. And the basic argument of it is that in. the age of industrial churn, there has. to be a middle way between. six-year-olds working on the factory. floor and socialism. And part of that. solution is to give workers a sort of. say in what's going on. Give normal. people some power in this in this in. this system. And I think that's the. thing we have to figure out with AI. I. won't say that I have all the solutions. because I haven't. But I think the.

fundamental question is how do you. ensure that normal people have some. control over this? control over what's. their kids are seeing, control over, you. know, the the the economic forces that. are being unleashed by AI, some. certainty that they're not going to wake. up in a world where they can't buy a. home, but some other guy owns 35. mansions, right? That that to me is is. the fundamental challenge of AI is it's. going to unleash a lot of wealth. creation, but if that wealth creation.

all goes to some some segment of people, you're going to have communism. like. that that is that is the choice before. us is a lot of wealth being created. that's good by the way I like I like. wealth being created but if if you don't. ensure that there's some broader. prosperity from that wealth creation. like we have run this experiment before. and it leads to communism. >> right so if the system is how do. we unfuck it. >> so [sighs and gasps]. >> you have a magic wand. >> I I mean look I I this is what I'm I'm. saying I'm being honest with you that I.

I don't have a magic wand I I think. there are a few things that that that we. should sort of take from this I think. Okay. The first is that we should give. workers a real say at the bargaining. table. Okay. So, what really worries me about AI is the. is the fact that private sector unions. have largely disappeared from the United. States of America. There are a couple of. exceptions, but if you go back to like. why did the United States and Britain. weather um the industrial revolution.

better than literally every other. western country? I think you could make. a good argument. Strong religious. institutions. Right now, we have very. weak religious institutions. Number two, I think you could say strong worker. participation institutions and not just. private sector labor unions. That was a. big piece of it. But people don't. realize that, you know, Hollywood major. studios would actually work with. community groups and churches to sort of. help like develop content. Now, this was.

an organic. This was a natural. cooperation. And this wasn't mandated by. some law, but where they'd go and say, "Help us produce content that actually. speaks to your membership, that speaks. to your community." And there was this. sense of participation in American. society that I think we've lost. And and. that's the thing that I think that we. have to rebuild a little bit. It's. interesting that, you know, the Trump. administration, the president. personally, certainly me have been. accused of being too pro- labor for. Republicans. But one of the reason why. I'm pro- labor as a Republican is.

because, and I'm not saying unions are. perfect. Some of them have very serious. problems. Like I'm opened about this, like the alternative may very well be. communism in the United States of. America. Not next year, but down the. road, you've got to give people a seat. at the table. And I think that's that's. one answer to the question. Um I I think. a second answer to the question is is. competition. So if if you go back again. to what worked and what was broken about. the industrial revolution, hyper monopolist style companies that.

had way too much power. I mean Teddy. Roosevelt famously talked about how um. you know some of the steel trusts were. more powerful than the United States. government. So you could vote your vote. didn't matter as much because the. corporations were more powerful than the. government. I think reigning that in. making sure that like how do you what's. the most obvious way to give normal. people participation it's democracy but. if a single corporation has monopolized.

an entire space then you don't have a. real a real democracy unless you reign. in the power of that company and I think. that that is another big risk with AI. it's that we have a hyper monopouist who. dominates the space and then influences. the government influences the nonprofit. sector. and then real people are effectively cut. out of the bargain. So again, I'm not. going to pretend sitting here that I. have all the solutions. I think about. this more than almost anything else. right now. But it's the solution has to.

be giving normal people actual authority. over their own lives. >> But how can the government get involved. in those steps? Like what could be done. on a federal level to implement that? Well, [sighs] you know, I I think one of. the things and and we've we've looked at. legislation along these lines, we. haven't yet pushed anything, but you. know, one problem with the 20 with with. like the private sector labor union. One. reason why you Democrats will say you. private unions are at super low.

participation rates because the. government is, you know, been anti-UN. There's like some element of truth to. that. But the reality is that a lot of. workers don't see the utility in joining. a union because it's like in a lot of. ways it's a 20th century institution. when you need a 21st century. institution. So I think updating the. modern union to be to make more sense in. the 21st century I think that's that's a. part of the story. Um you know I think I. think antitrust. >> how would you do that? Well, a friend of.

mine, his name is Orin Cass, actually, very fascinating guy, sort of a. right-of-c center economic thinker. you. know, his his idea is that 20th century. labor law presupposes a sort of zero sum. conflict between the company and the. union and that where you've seen unions. actually thrive certain places in. Europe, it's a little bit more. cooperative and the the unions actually. have a little bit more power themselves. where they can negotiate with the. corporation with a little bit more. breadth and a little bit more freedom.

Whereas in the United States, we sort of. set a floor. we make we we create a very. small number of things the union can. actually negotiate over and so a lot of. people say well why would I join a union. why would I participate in it so. basically making the union a little bit. more cooperative which requires changing. the legal form of it I think that's. interesting I think antitrust is a huge. piece of the story now it's it's a. little early with AI because we don't. yet know which companies are dominant. but I think one of the big mistakes man. we made in the early 2000s is we should. have gone after the big tech companies.

with antitrust like there is like a. trustbusting mechanism that exists in. the US government. We just didn't use. it. We're going to have to be willing to. use it in the 21st century. >> And when it comes to unions, um what. like what what is wrong with the current. structure. um in in terms of what what power the. unions have to negotiate for for labor. So let me look. So there's a concrete. example that that Orin uses all the.

time. So in in some European countries, you have a minimum wage, right? In some. European countries, the union can can. actually cut a deal with the employer to. where you pay a brand new employee less. than the minimum wage, then you pay a. more senior person higher than the. minimum wage. But in order to pay the. junior employee less than the minimum. wage, you have to provide them job. training and better benefits and so. forth. And so the idea is you turn the.

employ for the first couple of years you. turn the company almost into an. educational institution but in order to. do that the union has to have. flexibility. That kind of arrangement is. effectively illegal in the United States. of America. So it's that you create the. ability for the union to be more. flexible in how it negotiates. You don't. set all the terms for it. You allow the. union to figure out what's in the best. interest of its membership. But people. are opposed like initially knee-jerk. reaction to lowering wages and even in. lowering minimum wage. I mean the most.

people feel and I agree that minimum. wage is almost impossible to live off of. especially with. >> 100%. Yeah. That it is but but but what. these unions are not asking for I mean. you have to kind of trust the labor. representation of the people to sort of. make the right arrangement for them. And. so it's not, hey, let's create a minimum. wage or a wage floor that's lower than. the minimum wage. It's what about taking. for the first year of a person coming.

into the labor market where, you know, they work an internship for zero. dollars, right, at a at a company. Why. don't we allow our workers to work. effectively an internship, get the. training they need, get the benefits. that they need, and then join the. workforce full-time at a much higher. wage? The the idea is that you trust the. union to come up with this or or the. labor organization, whatever you want to. call it, is you actually give the union. the ability to sort of negotiate over. this stuff on behalf of its members. You.

don't assume the way the United States. we do it is we we basically take all. that authority away from the union. itself and we try to settle this stuff. at the level of the government. But. again, where unions have been more. successful, where they actually have. higher membership and participation. rates, what you see is the the these. organizations actually have much greater. flexibility and that ends up meaning. that more people want to join. That. means these organizations have more.

power and then that means they can. figure out the arrangement that works. best for their membership. So you kind. of have to trust people. You have to. trust that people are willing to do this. thing um for for their own for their own. benefit. And you know, so long as. they've got the right authority and so. long as they've got the right tools, you. give you kind of trust people to do. what's in their best interest in these. organizations to do what's in the best. interest of their membership. >> Well, the the problem that people would. have with that is that corporations have. a responsibility to their shareholders. and they always want to make the most.

money possible and they have to make. more money next quarter than they made. this quarter. And one of the ways they. do that is by paying people less. >> But that's why I think that you have to. give workers some some seat at the. bargaining table. There there there is a. there is a theory of like economics that. dominated in the late 20th century. America which is that basically that you. know the labor market was entirely. efficient and maybe the corporation. didn't want to pay their workers more. money but they would be forced to pay. their workers more money purely because.

if they didn't do that then they. wouldn't be able to get enough workers. Now, I do think that there's an argument. for like there are all of these ways why. we should give workers more bargaining. power. One of them and we've spent a lot. of time talking about labor. organizations and that's important. Man, one of the reasons why I'm such an. immigration hawk is because it is really. important not to flood the country with. low-wage immigrants, right? Because if. you give a corporation a choice between. a low-wage immigrant and a native worker. who's going to require, by the way, a. native worker of any race, they're going.

to be forced to pay the native worker. more if there's not a pool of low-wage. workers to to go to. And this is like a. consistent finding in the economics. literature, but also just common sense. that when you flood the country with. low-wage immigrants, this is why I think. the DSA types are a little full of. when they talk about helping normal. people. If you want to help a normal. person, don't provide a corporation nine. low-wage migrants to compete against. them when they're bargaining for wages. You actually give workers more power.

when you have a more restricted. immigration policy. >> Well, this is that's the that that's. that's where the real con is, right? Because a lot of Yeah. You've told me. that you had a conversation with uh. someone who was at the head of some. corporation that was upset that they. were trying to shut down illegal. immigration because he said it's. >> head of a hotel chain. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Cuz he said basically I want to be. able to pay my workers less money and. it's very hard because the native. workers expect higher wages. >> It's crazy. I mean there there dude.

there's there's this story from a few. years ago. It was the New York Times. It. was like unintentionally hilarious. And. it's talking about a, you know, why Apple would choose to. manufacture in Asia over the United. States of America. And it's talking. about how, you know, the American. workers and it's it's almost kind of. judgy towards the American workers. It's. like, well, you know, the American. workers want to go home and see their. kids and have dinner with their kids. And it's like, by the way, you go to the.

Foxcon factory in Apple in China, the. Foxcon factory that develops products. for Apple and China, and what do you. see? You literally see suicide nets. around the top of the building because, yeah, the workers work 72 hours a week. and they sleep in little apartments four. to a bedroom, but they also are so. miserable, you have to take steps to. prevent them from killing themselves. So, you know, what I want out of. American life is a little bit more. dignity, a little bit more, oh, you.

know, yeah, I can I can I can afford to. feed my family. I can also go home and. actually watch my kids' baseball game. And that balance, I think, if you're. looking at it from a pure profit motive, you know, maybe the corporation isn't. going to think like that, which is why. you have to give the people real power. to push back and advocate for their own. interests. I think a lot of people in. this country, if they had to choose, especially people that have money, if. they had to choose between a phone that. was manufactured in America where people.

were paid a very good wage and had. benefits and you have an iPhone that has. a little American flag on the back and. you have one that doesn't. I think a lot. of people would buy the one with the. American flag on the back because. >> just they would feel better about their. purchase. They'd feel I feel weird when. I'm holding a phone [laughter] and I. know that someone was working in some. factory in some foreign country working. 15 hours a day and and being paid. nothing. >> That's right. I think that's true of our. food, by the way, too. >> Yeah. >> They they'd much rather it be, you know,

made locally. They're willing to pay a. little bit more so long as it's it's. healthier and it's made locally. There. obviously are exceptions to every rule, but I I do again I think that we have. run the experiment where we just try to. do everything with low-wage foreigners, whether they're in the United States via. illegal immigration or whether they're. outside the United States via offshoring. and outsourcing. And what it has led to. is I think a society where socialism is.

a bit on the rise. And one of our jobs. in the administration, I think about. this all the time, is how do you make. things I'm not saying we're perfect and. I'm not saying there isn't a lot of work. to do because there is like we were left. in quite a hole by 40 years of bad. policy. People always talk about the. Biden administration inflation. Yeah, the Biden administration inflation. was terrible. Got up to 9%. By the way, I think today's CPI report is you had. deflation in the United States. We. actually had prices coming down which is. good because the Iran war gas prices. came down. But like.

>> gas prices have come down now because of. the Iran war. >> No, no, no. Compared to where they were. a month ago, >> right? >> So they're they're not down from the. beginning of the war, but they're down. from where they were a month ago. So you. had a good CPI report, uh a consumer. price inflation report today. My my. point is, yes, I don't ever get to the. 9% inflation of the B administration. Yes, the Trump administration has had a. much better record on inflation than the. Biden administration. nothing close to. 9% even in our worst month. But some of.

this stuff is actually much longer term. This is 40 years of failed bipartisan. leadership which has created really a. kind of shell corporation out of the. United States of America. We don't make. enough of our own stuff. We don't have. enough self-reliance. Our workers don't. have enough bargaining power. That has. led in a lot of ways, I think, to this. kind of socialism fervor. And we have to. keep fixing these problems. Again, I. think that we're going in the right. direction. Maybe people disagree, but. it's going to take years to fix this.

problem. And if we don't, we are going. to end up with a socialist president in. this country. >> I think it's also a narrative change. And that the the narrative is stopping. immigration is cruelty. Correct. And. you're you're you're racist or. xenophobic and that uh we should just. instead give these people citizenship. And it's it's not a coincidence that I. mean like what we dealt with over the. last four years was insane where they.

just opened the border and not just. encouraged people to come across but. facilitated it helped them got them on. Medicaid got them on social security got. people the they told people do you have. a bad back okay well you're permanent. disability and you get free money put. them in a hotel give them a phone like. that's crazy and then move them to blue. states and then you realize that that. has a direct impact on congressional. seats. >> because of the census which is also. nuts. The census should count citizens.

>> It should only count citizens but it. doesn't and that actually steals. congressional representation away from. areas that have lower illegal. immigration, right? >> Which is its own its own problem. So. yeah, it it's it's the thing that I. don't understand about the Democratic. Socialists of America. And obviously I. disagree with a lot of their ideas, but. like if you go back to Caesar Chavez, one of the original like founding. fathers of the American workers rights. movement, okay? He was a hardcore.

restrictionist on immigration because he. thought that the bosses would bring in. low-wage immigrants to compete against. his workers and that would drive down. their wages. And yet the DSA, which says. they care about the wages of workers, is. quite literally like an open borders. organization. So I I tend to think that. it's it's all BS that they are actually. pursuing a set of policies that are good. for. that are like corporations care way more.

about open borders than they do about. any other policy the DSA cares about. So. while these people say that they're. trying to fight for workers and they're. trying to fight for the working man, the. actual end result of DSA policy is to. flood the country with low-wage. immigrants which will destroy the middle. class in this country. In fact, we have. run this experiment for decades now and. we have a much weaker middle class than. we did before it started. And I think. this is a part of the the problem this.

country has that there's this narrative. uh Republicans are cruel and they're. anti-worker and that they're anti- lower. class people or lower middle class. people. >> Yep. >> That narrative has to someone has to do. a better job of messaging. >> I'm trying to, man. I'm trying to. But, you know, it's it's one of those things. that it's it took a long while for it to. set in. It's going to take a long while. to to get out of it. But what I just I. try to remind people is that anybody who. actually cares about the safety of your. community is going to care about not.

empowering police brutality, but. empowering the good cops to do what they. need to do. Anybody who cares about law. and order is going to want to throw. violent criminals in jail, not close. down the prison. Anybody who cares about. your wages and your safety is going to. want to control the border. So I I I. just all I can think to do is to remind. people that I'm not saying Republicans. are perfect and you know I have. disagreements of course within my own. party all the time but fundamentally our. party is right now pursuing a much.

better set of policies when it comes to. safety of your home, your wages, your. ability to keep more of your money. I. just got to keep preaching that message. and you know the chips fall where they. may. And if you just look at the result. of what you see in these cities where. they don't enforce crime, where they. don't enforce. immigration laws, they provide sanctuary. states, you see disasters over and over.

and over again. >> Yeah. >> I mean, and I I don't understand. >> exactly. >> why people who are voting for these. things can't see that. They can't see. that the results have been catastrophic. year after year. They keep getting. worse. >> And the idea of voting a new better. person to do the same thing is just. crazy. >> Yeah, it it's it's totally crazy to me, too. I think part of it is we haven't. done a good enough job of actually going. to some of these places. Part of it is.

that it is shifting and sometimes these. shifts just take a long time. If you. look, the Republican party under Trump's. leadership is way more workingass, way. more middle class than the Republican. party of 20 years ago. So these things. are starting to shift. But the public. safety thing is very interesting to me. because like one of the promises of. America is that every man, woman, and. child, rich or poor, black or white, deserves public safety. Like it every. rich person ever has had public safety.

Every rich person ever has been able to. afford some security guard to make sure. that somebody who comes and tries to. steal their stuff or kidnap their kids, they're protected against that. What. America did is we democratized public. safety. Every person gets to keep their. property. Every person gets to not be. stolen from. Every person gets to walk. down their neighborhood at night without. being being mugged. And obviously we. have imperfectly applied that. But what. the left has done over the last few.

years. Why I think the crime thing is. it's not just a sort of public safety. thing. It's also a class thing is they. have made working people less safe. Like. if you look at my neighborhood, the. neighborhood that I my working-class. grandparents raised me in, it became. less safe over time. And really. workingclass neighborhoods had much. higher rates of violence, much higher. rates of carjackings and so forth. That. happened during Biden's administration.

>> That's not a coincidence. >> No. Uh anything else? [laughter]. >> Anything else? >> Go by Go by Go by Communion, Joe, and we. can we can talk about uh religion and. faith and the Ten Commandments next. time. But thanks for having me, man. >> Thanks for being here. Appreciate it. All right. [music] Wrap it up. Bye, everybody. Great. [music].

Hey. Hey.