Joe Rogan Experience #2404 - Elon Musk

Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out. >> The Joe Rogan Experience. >> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY. NIGHT. All day. >> Exactly. >> Just every morning. >> Wonder what Jeff Bezos is doing. >> He's doing some [laughter] definitely. doing some testosterone. He looks. jacked. >> He looks jacked, right? >> Yeah. But he didn't like. >> quick. >> quick. >> quick [laughter]. at age like at 50 at age 59 in less than.

a year he he went from pencilet geek to. uh looking like a like the rock. >> Yeah. Like a little miniature alpha. fella. >> Yeah. Like like his neck got bigger than. his head. >> Yeah. He got bigger. >> But then like his earlier pictures his. neck's like a noodle. >> I support this activity. I like to see. him going in this direction. >> which is fine. And his voice dropped. like two octaves. I want you to move in. that direction as well. >> I think we can achieve this. >> I I I mean I should. >> I think we can achieve. >> gigachad.

[laughter]. That's what people called it. >> Where is that guy? >> Bele. Uh I don't know where he is. >> That's like a real guy. >> The artist. Yeah. >> No. >> Oh, gigachad. [laughter]. Oh, gigachad. Yeah. I don't know if. that's a real guy. It's hard to say. >> No, it is a real guy. >> It is a real guy. >> He's got the crazy jaw and like perfect. sculpted hair. >> Yeah. Well, I mean, they may have. exaggerated a little bit, but. >> um. >> but uh No, I think I think he actually. just kind of looked like that in. reality. >> Wow. >> Um so. >> like like he's a pretty unique looking. individual.

>> I think we can achieve this. That guy. right there, that's a real guy. [laughter]. >> That's a real dude. >> I always thought that was CGI. >> No, I think one of I think the upper. right one is not [laughter] him. That's. not. >> But that one to the left of. [clears throat] that like that's real. No, that's that's artificial, bro. That's fake. That's got that uncanny. valley feel to it, doesn't it? >> It's It's not impossible. >> No, no, it's not impossible to achieve, but it's not it's not possible to. maintain that kind of leanness. I mean, that's like like you're you're also at.

that point they're he's dehydrating and. all sorts of things. >> Oh, it's based on a real person. >> Yeah. Yeah. Based on, >> right, but it's not a real person. What. does he really look like? >> Like those images, I think, are. [ __ ]. >> Some of them are. Is that real? Okay. That That looks real. That looks like a. really jack bodybuilder. >> Yeah. >> Yeah, that looks real. Like that's. achievable. But there's a few of those. images where you're just like, "What's. going on here?". >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Totally. Um. >> Well, I mean, you see you see [laughter]. >> that guy is that is that the.

>> that's the real dude? >> Well, there's that that that Icelandic. dude who's Thor. >> Oh, yeah. The guy who jumps in the. frozen lakes and [ __ ]. >> Well, the guy who played the mountain. Um. >> Oh, that guy. >> That is that is like a that that is like. a a mutant strong human. Yes. >> Like like uh he would be in like the. X-Men or something, you know? >> He's just like not like uh. >> and there's that you know that have you. seen that meme tent and tent bag? >> Um you know how like it's like it's. really hard to get the tent tent in. >> Oh, right. Right. [laughter].

>> That's true. >> Then there's a picture of of him and his. girlfriend. That's hilarious. [laughter]. >> Yeah, that's. >> I don't know how it gets in there, you. know? It's like it seems too small. But. >> I met Brian [laughter] Shaw. Brian Shaw. is like the world's most powerful man. And he's almost [laughter] 7 feet tall. He's 400 lb. >> And his his bone density is 1 in 500.

million people. So there's one it's like. there's like maybe 16 people. >> He's an enormous human being. like a. legitimate giant just like that guy. But. we met him. He was hanging out with us. in the green room of the mother ship. It's like, okay, if this was like David. and Goliath days, like this is an actual. giant like the giants of the Bible. >> Once in a while they get a super giant. person. >> This is a real a real one. Like not a. tall skinny basketball player, like a 7. foot 400B powerliffter. >> Like you don't want to especially look.

at him. That's the guy. See if there's a. photo of him standing next to like a. regular human. I. >> was trying to get. >> There it is. That's him right there. Like there's like there's like one of. him with next to standing next to Arnold. and stuff and it's where and everyone. everyone just looks tiny. >> I mean I think he's a pretty cool dude. actually. >> Oh, Brian's very cool. Very smart, too. Unusually, you know, you expect anybody. to be that big. It's got to be a [ __ ]. >> No. >> Yeah. There was there's Andre the Giant. who was awesome. You. >> he was great in Princess Bride and. >> No, he was just awesome period.

>> Yeah. Yeah. So, we were talking about um. this interview with Sam Alman and. Tucker, and I was like, we should. probably just talk about this on the air. because it is one of the craziest. interviews I think I've ever seen in my. life. >> Yeah. >> Where Tucker starts bringing up this guy. who was a whistleblower, whatever. >> A whistleblower who, you know, >> committed suicide, but it doesn't look. like it. >> And and he's talking to Sam Alman about. this. And Sam Alton was like, "Are you. accusing me?" He's like, "No, no, no.

I'm not. I'm just saying I I think. someone killed him. >> Yeah. And like And it should be. investigated. >> Yeah. >> Um not just drop the case. >> It seems like. >> they just dropped the case. Yeah. Yeah. But his parents think he was murdered. >> Yeah. >> Um the wires to a security camera were. cut. Um. >> blood in two rooms. >> Blood in two rooms. Someone else's wig. was in the room. And. >> someone else's wig. >> Wig. >> Wig. Yes. Not his wig. >> Not normal to have a wig laying around. >> Yes. Um and um and he ordered Door Dash.

uh right before allegedly committing. suicide. >> Uh which uh is it seems unusual, you. know? >> Yeah. >> It's like, you know, let's I'm going to. order pizza on second thoughts, I'll. kill myself. Uh is it seems like that's. a very rapid change in mindset. >> It's very weird. And especially the. parents have they they don't believe he. committed suicide at all. >> Has no note or anything. >> No. >> Yeah. >> It seems pretty [ __ ] up. And you know, the idea that a whistleblower for an. enormous AI company that's worth.

billions of dollars might get whacked, that's not outside the pale. >> I mean, it's straight out of a movie. >> Right out of a movie, but right out of a. movie is real sometimes. >> Yeah. Right. [laughter] Exactly. >> It's a little weird that I I think they. should do a proper investigation. Like, what's the downside on that proper. investigation? >> Right. >> No. >> Yeah, >> for sure. But the whole exchange is so. bizarre. >> Yeah. Yeah. Sam Alman's reaction to being accused of. murder is bizarre. >> Look, I don't know if he's guilty, but.

it's not possible to look more guilty. [laughter]. >> So, I'm like, >> or look more weird. >> Yeah. >> You know, maybe it's just his social. thing. Like, maybe he's just odd with. confrontation and it just goes blank, you know? But if if somebody was. accusing me of killing Jamie, like if. Jamie was a whistleblower and Jamie got. whacked and then I'd be like, "Wait, what are you what are you are you. accusing me of killing my friend?" Like, "What the [ __ ] are you talking about?" I. would I would be a little bit more I.

rate. >> Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. You know, it would. be. >> I would be a little upset. >> Yeah. It'd be like Well, you'd be like, you'd certainly in insist on a thorough. investigation. Yeah. >> As opposed to trying to sweep it under. the rug. >> Yeah. I wouldn't assume that he got that. he committed suicide. I would be. suspicious. If Tucker was telling me. that aspect of the story, I'd be like, "That does seem like a murder. [ __ ] We. should look into this.". >> I mean, all signs point to it being a. murder. Not not saying, you know, Tim. Molvin had anything to do with the.

murder, but uh. >> blood in two rooms. >> It's blood in two rooms. Like, yeah, there's the wires to the security camera. and the door dash being ordered right. before suicide. No suicide note. his. parents think uh he was murdered and um. the people that I know who knew him said. he was not suicidal. So I'm like this why would you jump to. the conclusion. >> parents sued the. >> uh landlord? >> They sued the son's landlord alleged the. owners and the managers of their son's. San Francisco apartment building were. part of a widespread cover up of his. death. >> The landlord.

>> Yeah. There's a bunch of weird They said. there was like packages missing from the. building. Some people said they saw. packages still being delivered and all a. sudden they all disappeared. >> Huh. But that could be people steal. people's packages all the time. >> The porch pirate situation. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Says they failed to safeguard. >> Also, I mean, the amount of trauma those. poor parents have gone through with. their son dying like that. I mean, it. must. >> God bless them. And how could they stay. sane after something like that? They're. probably they're so griefstricken. Who.

knows what they believe at this point. >> Yeah. It should have asked if Epson. killed himself. >> [laughter]. >> Yeah, that's the the Cash Mattel thing. Cash Mattel Dan Bonino trying to. convince everybody of that. Like, okay. >> The guards weren't there and the cameras. stopped working and um. >> you know, >> the guards were asleep. The cameras. weren't working. He had a a giant. steroided up bodybuilder guy that he was. sharing a cell with that was a murderer.

who was a bad cop. Like, all of it's. kind of nuts. All of it's kind of nuts. like that he would just kill himself. rather than reveal all of his. billionaire friends. >> Yeah. >> And then. >> did you see Tim Dylan talking to Chris. Cuomo about this? >> I did. He liked the idea. >> Chris Cromo just looked so stupid. [laughter]. >> Tim just listed off all the. >> Tim just and he's like I agree it is. strange. Like of course it's strange. Chris. Jesus Christ. You can't just go. with the tide. You got to think things.

through. And if you think that one. through, you're like, I don't think he. killed himself. Nobody does. You'd have. to work for an intelligence agency to. think he killed himself. [laughter]. >> It does. It does seem unlikely. >> It seems highly unlikely. Highly, highly unlikely. All roads point. to murder. >> Yes. >> Point to they had to get rid of him. because he knew too much. Whatever the. [ __ ] he was doing, whatever kind of an. asset he was, whatever thing he was up. to, you know, was apparently very.

effective. >> Yes. And a lot of people are. compromised. You see, your boy Bill Gates is now. saying climate change is not a big deal. Like, relax everybody. I know I scared. the [ __ ] out of you for the last decade. and a half, but ah, we're going to be. fine. [laughter]. >> Yeah. I mean, you know, as was I was saying just. before coming into the studio with, you. know, it like every day there's some. crazy wild new thing that's happening. It's It feels like reality is. accelerating. >> It's every day. And Every day it's like.

more and more ridiculous to the point. where the simulation is more and more. undeniable. >> Yeah. Yeah. It really feels like. simulation, you know? It's like, come. on. What are the odds that this could be. the case? >> Are you paying attention at all to Three. Atlas? Are you watching the. >> the comet? >> Yeah. Whatever it is. >> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I mean, one thing I. can say is like, look, I. if if I was aware of any evidence of. aliens, um, you Joe, you have my word. I.

will come on your show and I will reveal. it on the show. >> Okay. >> Yeah, >> that's a good deal. >> Yeah, it's pretty good. >> I'll believe you. Yeah, thank you. >> I I'll stick I keep my you know, keep my. promises. So, um. >> All right. I'll hold you to that. >> Yeah. Yeah. And and [clears throat] I'm. never committing suicide to be clear. [laughter]. >> I don't think you would either. >> So, on camera, guys, I am never. committing suicide ever. >> If someone says you committed suicide, [laughter] I will fight tooth and nail. >> I will fight tooth and nail. I will I. will not believe it. I will not believe. it. The thing about the three eye atlas.

is it's. >> a hell of a name actually. >> Yeah, it's a third eye sounds like third. eye or something. >> Yeah, it does. [laughter]. Three eye is third. It's only the third. interstellar object that's detected. >> Okay. >> Yeah. [snorts] Obias. >> Yeah. Alo was on the podcast a couple. days ago talking about it. >> Yeah. It could be. I don't know. But I. >> apparently today they're saying that. it's changed course. Um, >> did you see that, Jamie? >> Avi said something today. I'll send it.

to you. Um, >> uh, I know it's on Reddit. >> Here you go, Jamie. I'll send it to you. right now. Um, it's fascinating. It's. fascinating also because it's made. almost entirely of nickel, whatever it. is. And the only way that exists, uh, here is, uh, industrial alloys. apparently. Um um most no there are. there are. >> there are definitely uh comets that and. asteroids that are made primarily of. nickel in fact. Yeah. So the the places.

where um you mine nickel on earth is. actually where there was an asteroid or. comet that hit earth that was a nickel. rich uh you know. >> nickel rich nickel rich rich deposit. >> Yeah that's that's that's it's coming. Those are from impacts. You definitely. didn't want to be there at the time. because anything would have been. obliterated. Right. Um, but that's. that's where the the sources of nickel. and cobalt are these days. >> So, this is Ovio Lope. A few hours ago, the first hint of non-gravitational. acceleration that something other than. gravity is affecting its acceleration,

meaning something is affecting its. trajectory beyond gravity was indicated. Interesting. Um. so it's mostly nickel very little iron. which uh he was saying uh is on earth. only exists in alloys but whatever you. know you're dealing with another planet. >> there this there are there are there are. cases where there's very nickel richch. asteroids meteorites that heavy that.

something from space. >> Yeah it it's only yeah it doesn't mean. it'll be a very sort of heavy spaceship. if you make it all out of nickel. Oh. yeah. >> And [ __ ] huge. The size of Manhattan. and all nickel. That's kind of nuts. >> Yeah, that's a heavy spaceship. >> That's a real problem if it hits. >> Uh yes. No, it would like obliterate a. continent type of thing. >> Um maybe maybe worse. >> Probably kill most of human life. >> Um. >> if not all of us. >> I haven't depends on what the the total. mass is. But um there's I mean the thing. is like in the fossil record there are.

um you know there's like arguably. arguably five major extinction events. um like the biggest one of which is the. Perine extinction uh where um almost all. life was eliminated. That that actually. occurred over several million several. million years. Um the there's the. Jurassic. I think Jurassic is I think. that one's pretty definitively an. asteroid. Um and um but there's but. there's been five major extinction. events, but um but what they don't count. are really the ones that merely take out.

a continent. >> So. >> merely. >> Yeah. cuz that that because those don't. really show up on the fossil record, you. know, >> right? >> Um so unless it's enough to cause a you. know mass extinction event throughout. Earth, it it doesn't show up, you know, in a fossil record that's uh 200 million. years old. Um so the uh yeah but but. there have been many um many impacts. that would have sort of destroyed all. life on you know let's say half of North. America or something like that. there.

many such impacts through the course of. history. >> Yeah. And there's nothing we can do. about it right now. >> Yeah. There was one that um hits there. was a one that hit Siberia and destroyed. I think um few hundred square miles. >> Oh, that's the Tungusa. >> Yeah. That's the one from the 1920s, right? >> Yeah. >> Yeah. That's the one that coincides with. that meteor that uh comet storm that we. go through every June and every November. that they think is responsible for that. younger dest. >> Yeah. Yeah, all that shit's crazy. Um,

thank you before we go any further for. letting us have a tour of SpaceX and. letting us be there for the rocket. launch. >> One of the absolute coolest things I've. ever seen in my life. And we we've we. were we thought it was only like I. thought it was a half a mile. Jamie's. like it was a mile away. Turned out it's. almost two miles away. And you feel it. in your chest. >> Yeah. It's. >> you have to wear earplugs and you feel. it in your chest and it's 2 miles away.

>> It was [ __ ] amazing. And then to go. with you up into the command center and. to watch all the Starlink satellites. with all the different cameras and all. in real time as it made its way all the. way to Australia. How many minutes? Like. 35 40 minutes. >> Yeah. >> Wild it touchdown in Australia. >> Yeah. >> [ __ ] crazy. It was amazing. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Absolutely amazing. The starship's. awesome. Um, and anyone can go watch the. launch actually. So, you can just go to. um, South Padre Island, get has a great.

view of the launch. Um, so it's like. where a lot of spring breakers go. >> Um, but um, but we'll be flying pretty. frequently um, out of Starbase in South. Texas. And we we formally incorporated. it as a city. So, it's it's actually a. legally an actual legal city, Starbase, Texas. >> Um, it's not that often you hear like, hey, we made a city, you know. [laughter] Um, that [snorts] used to be. like the like in in the old days like a. startup would be you go and gather a. bunch of people and say, "Hey, let's go. make a town." Literally, that was like. that would have been startups in in in.

the old days. >> Um, >> or a country. >> Yeah. Or a country. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. Yeah. Actually, >> if you tried doing that today, there'd. be a real problem. >> Yeah. That things are so much so much. set in stone on the country front these. days. You might pull it off. You might. be able [clears throat] to pull it off. If you got a a solid island, you might. be able to pull it off. >> You know, it's probably, >> you know, like like at. owns lai. >> Yeah, you could probably if you put if. you put enough effort into it, you could. make a new country. >> This is one of the different ones. This. is one of the ones that you catch, >> right? Or is that one? >> Yeah, that that's the booster. So that's.

the super heavy booster. Uh so that's. the one with the booster's got 33. engines. Um. that that uh um and it's you know by. version four that will have about 10,000. tons of thrust. Um you know right now. it's about 7 8,000 tons of thrust. Um, that's that's the largest flying object. ever made. >> I had to explain to someone. They were. going, "Why do they blow up all the time. if he's so smart?" Because there was. there was this [ __ ] idiot on. television. Some guy was being. interviewed and they were talking about.

you. And he goes, "Oh, I think he's a. fuckwit." And he goes, "He's a fuckwit.". And he goes, "Why you say he's [ __ ] Oh, his rockets keep blowing up." And. someone said, "Yeah, well, why do his. rockets blow?" And I had to explain. Yeah. Because it's the only way you find. out what the tolerances are. You have to. you have to a few. >> corners of the box. So, so like so. [clears throat] when you do a new uh. rocket development program, um you you. have to uh do what's called uh you know, exploring the limits, the corners of the. box where you say it's like you worst. case this, worst case that um to figure. out um uh where where the limits are. So.

uh you blow up, you know, not not. admittedly in the development process. sometimes blows up accidentally. Um but. but we intentionally subject it to uh uh. you know a flight regime that is much. worse than what we expect in normal. flight so that when we put people on. board or valuable cargo it doesn't blow. up. Um so um so so for example for the. the flight that you saw we we actually. deliberately took um heat shield tiles. off the the the ship the off of Starship.

in in some of the worst locations to say. okay if we lose a heat shield tile here. is it is it catastrophic or is it not? Um and we we nonetheless uh Starship was. able to do a soft landing um in uh in. the Indian Ocean just uh west of. Australia. Um which as and it got there. from Texas in like I don't know 354. minutes type of thing. So. >> So it landed even though you put it. through this situation where it has. compromised shield.

it it had an an an an unusually we we we. brought it in hot like an an extra hot. trajectory uh with missing tiles um to. see if it would still make it to a soft. landing which it did. Now I I should. point out it did have there were some. holes that were burnt into it. Um but. it's it was robust enough to land. despite having some holes burnt you know. that that you know cuz it's coming it's. coming in like a blazing meteor. You can. see you can see the real time video. Well, tell me the speed again because. the the speed was bananas. You were.

talking about. >> Yeah, it's like 17,000 mph. like like 25 times the speed of sound or. thereabouts. So, um the uh uh so so. think of it like it's it's like 12 times. faster than a bullet from an assault. rifle. You know, bullet from assault. rifles around Mach 2. >> and it's just and it's [clears throat]. huge. >> Yeah. [laughter]. Yeah. Or or if you compare it to like a. bullet from a um you know a 45 or or 9. mil which is subsonic that's you know it. it'll be about 30 times faster than a.

bullet from a handgun. >> 30 times faster than a bullet from a. handgun and it's the size of a. skyscraper. >> Yes. [laughter]. >> Yeah. That's fast. >> It's so wild. It's so wild to see, man. It It's uh It's so exciting. This the. factor is so exciting too because like. genuinely no [ __ ] I felt like I was. witnessing history. I felt like it was a. scene in a movie where someone had. expectations and they like what are they. doing? They're building rockets. And you.

go there and as we were walking through. Jamie, you could speak to this too. Didn't you have the feeling where you're. like. >> oh this is way bigger than I thought it. was. This is [laughter] huge. Awesome. >> Gigantic. >> [ __ ] crazy. >> That's what she said. the ah the amount. of rockets you're making. I don't know. if you. >> tent back. [laughter]. >> Gig Chad in the house. >> This is way big. >> It's a giant metal dick. [laughter]. You're [ __ ] [ __ ] the universe with. your giant metal dick. That's. >> I mean, yeah, it is. It is very big.

>> And the sheer numbers of them that you. guys are making. And then this is a. version and you have a new updated. version that's coming soon. >> And what is the It's a It's a little. longer. Um. >> more pointy. >> Uh it's the same amount of pointy. Um. but the there's it's it's got a bit more. length. Um the the interstage, you see. that that interstage section with kind. of like the grill area. >> Mhm. >> Um that's uh that's now integrated with. the boost stage. Um so uh we do um.

what's called hot staging. Uh where we. light the ship engines while it's still. attached to the booster. So the boost. the booster engines are still thrusting. is still it's it's uh you know it's. still being pushed forward by the. booster of the ship. Uh but then we. light the ship engines and the ship. engines actually pull away from the. booster even though the booster engines. are still firing. >> Whoa. >> Um so it's blasting flame through uh. that that grill section but we integrate. that grill section into uh the boost.

stage with the next uh version of the. rocket. Um and uh and explosion in the. rocket will have the Raptor 3 engines. which are a huge improvement. Um you may. you may have seen them in the lobby. because we got like the Raptor 1, two, and three. And you can see the dramatic. improvement in simplicity. Um we should. probably put a plaque there to also show. how much the we reduced the weight uh. the cost and the and improved the. efficiency and the uh thrust. So the. Raptor 3 uh has uh you know almost twice.

the thrust of Raptor Raptor 1. >> Wow. >> So you see Raptor 3. It looks like it. looks like it's got parts missing. Right. >> And how many. >> It's very very clean. >> How many of them are on the rocket? >> There's 33 on the on the booster. >> Whoa. Um and and each of each Raptor. engine is producing twice as much thrust. as all four engines on a 747.

Wow. So that engine is smaller than a. 747 engine, but is producing, you know, um you know, almost 10 times the thrust. of a 747 engine. Um so extremely high. power to weight ratio. Um. and um. >> and so when there's. >> 33 of them. >> you when you so when you're designing. these you get to Raptor one you see its. efficiency you see where you can improve. it you get to Raptor 2 how many how far. can you scale this up with just the same.

sort of technology with propellant and. ignition and engines like how much. further can you. >> I mean we're pushing the limits of. physics here um so um. and and really in order to to make a a. fully reusable orbital rocket which no. one has succeeded in doing uh yet. including including us. Um but but uh. Starship is the first time that there is. a design for a rocket where where full.

and rapid reusability is actually. possible. So it was not there's not. there's not even been a design before. where it was possible. Certainly not a. design that that that got made any. hardware at all. Um just we just we just. live we live on a planet uh where the. gravity uh is is is quite high like. earth's gravity is quite really quite. quite high. Um um and if the gravity was. even 10 or 20% uh higher uh we'd be. stuck on Earth forever. Um like we yeah.

we could not use certainly couldn't use. conventional rockets. You'd have to like. blow yourself off the surface with like. a nuclear bomb or something crazy. Um so. but on the other hand if if Earth's. gravity was just a little lower like. even 10 20% lower it then uh getting to. orbit would be easy. So it's like it's. like it's like this if this was a video. game it's set to like maximum difficulty. but not impossible. >> Okay. >> Um so that's that's where we have um. here. So it's it's not as though um.

others have uh ignored the concept of. reusability. they've just uh concluded. that it was too difficult to achieve. And we've been working at on on this for. a long time at at SpaceX. Um and um you. know, I'm the chief engineer of the. company. Um although I should say that. that uh you know, we have an extremely. talented engineering team. I think we've. got the best uh rocket engineering team. that has ever been assembled. Um uh it's. it's an honor to work with such such.

incredible people. Um so uh so so it's. fair to say that you know we have not. yet succeeded in creating in achieving. full reusability but we at last have a. rocket uh where full reusability is. possible. Um and I think I think we'll. achieve it next year. So um. uh that's a that's a really big deal. And the reason the reason that's that's. such a big deal is that full reusability. um uh drops the cost of access to space.

by a hundred. um maybe even more than 100 actually. So. could be like a thousand. The you can. think of it like any mode of transport. Like imagine if aircraft were were not. reusable. Like you flew somewhere, you. throw the plane like like imagine if. like the way the way conventional. rockets work is it would be like if you. had an airplane and and and instead of. landing at your destination, you. parachute out um and the plane crashes.

somewhere and you land at your desk and. you and you land on a parachute at your. destination. Now that would be a very. expensive trip [laughter]. and you and you'd need another plane to. get back. Okay. Um, but that's how the. other rockets in the world work. Um, now. the SpaceX Falcon rocket is the only one. that is is there that is at least mostly. reusable. You've se you've seen the. Falcon rocket, you know, land. We've now. done over 500 landings of of the SpaceX. rocket of the of the Falcon 9 rocket. Um.

and um and and this year um you know we. we'll deliver probably I don't know. somewhere between 2200 and 2500 tons to. orbit um with with the Falcon 9 uh. Falcon Heavy rockets uh not counting. anything for from Starship. Um. >> and this is mostly Starlink. Yes, mostly. Starling, but we launch uh many other we. even launch our competitors on um. competitors to Starink on on Falcon 9.

We charge them the same price. Pretty. fair. Um uh but uh SpaceX this year will. deliver um roughly 90% of all Earth mass. to orbit. >> Wow. >> Um and then of the remaining 10% um most. of that is done by China. And then the. then the remaining kind of roughly 4% is. uh everyone else in the world including. our America uh domestic competitors. >> You know um it's kind of incredible how. many things are in space like how many.

things are floating above us now? >> There's a lot of things. >> Yeah. >> Is there though? >> Right. But is there a saturation point where. we're going to have problems with all. these different satellites that are. >> um I think as long as the satellites are. um maintained uh there's there it'll be. fine. This space is very roomy. Um it's. like you can think of um like space as. being concentric shells of the surface. of the earth. So, um, you know, there's.

there's it's the surface of the earth, but but there's it's a series. >> much larger. >> Yeah. It's like a series of concentric. trails. Um, >> and think of an Airstream trailer flying. around up there. There's a lot of room. for air streams. >> Yeah. I mean, imagine Yeah. If there. just a few thousand airirstreams um on. on Earth. >> Yeah. >> What are the odds that they'd hit each. other? You know, >> they wouldn't be very crowded. No. And. then you got to go bigger. >> Yeah. >> Because you're dealing with far above. Earth. >> Hundreds of miles above Earth. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. >> Yeah. So, it's the um but the goal of.

SpaceX is to get rocket technology to. the point where we can extend life. beyond Earth and that we can establish a. self-sustaining city on Mars. Uh a. permanent base on the moon. That would. be very cool. I mean, imagine if we had. like a, you know, moon base alpha where. there's like a permanent science base on. the moon. >> That would be pretty dope. Or at least a. tourist trap. >> I mean, a lot of people be willing to go. to the moon for just for a tour. That's. for sure. We could probably pay for our. space program with that, you know,

>> probably. Yeah. Well, >> because it's like if if you if you could. go to the moon with and and safely, >> uh. I think we'd get a lot of people uh. would would pay for that, you know. >> Oh, 100%. After the first year, after. nobody died for like. >> Yeah. Just make sure. [laughter]. Exactly. Are you going to come back? Yeah. >> Because like that submarine, they they. had a bunch of successful launches in. that private submarine before it. imploded and killed everybody. That was. not a good design. Obviously, >> it was a very bad design. Terrible. design. >> And the engineers said it would not.

withstand the pressure of those depths. Like there was a lot of whistleblowers. in that company too. >> Yeah. Um they they they made that out of. uh carbon fiber which is it doesn't make. any sense because um you actually need. you need to be dense to go down. Um in. any case, just make it out of steel. If. you make it out of uh sort of just, you. know, a big steel casting, that's that's. you you'll be safe and nothing. Why. would they make it out of carbon fiber. then? Is it cheaper? >> Um I think they think carbon fiber. sounds cool or something. But uh.

>> it does sound cool. >> It it sounds cool, but um because it's. such it's such low density, you actually. actually have to add extra mass to go. down because it's it's low density. But. if you just have a giant, you know, hollow ball bearing, uh you're going to. be fine. >> Speaking of carbon fiber, did you check. out my unplugged Tesla out there? >> Yeah, it's cool. >> Pretty sick, right? Yeah. Have you guys. ever thought about doing something like. that? like having like an AMG division. of Tesla where you do like custom stuff. >> Um. I think it's best to leave that to the.

custom shops. Uh you know we're we're. like Tesla's focus is autonomous cars. Um you know building kind of futuristic. autonomous cars. Um. so. um. like I think it's we want the future to. look like the future. Um, so the did. like did you see like our designs for. like the sort of the robotic bus? It. looks pretty cool.

>> The robotic bus is also being totally. auton. but it looks it looks cool. It's it's. very art deco. It's it's like it's like. futuristic art deco. Um, and um, it it does it like I think we want to. change the aesthetic over time. You. don't want the aesthetic to be constant. over time. You want to evolve the. aesthetic. Um, so um, you know, like my.

like I have a son who's he's like, you. know, he's he's he's like even more. autistic than me and um and, uh, but. he's he has these great observations. Who is this? >> A Saxon. He has these great observations. in the world uh because he's he just. views the world through a different lens. than than most people. Um and he was. like, "Dad, why does the world look like. it's 2015?" [laughter]. [clears throat]. >> And I'm like, "Damn, the world does look. like it's 2015." Like the aesthetic has. not evolved since 2015.

>> Oh, that's what it looks like. >> Yeah. >> Oh, wow. >> That's pretty cool. >> Oh, yeah. That's like. >> like You'd want to see that going down. the road, you know? >> Yeah. You'd be like, "Okay, this is. we're in the future." You know, it. doesn't look like 2015. >> What is that ancient science fiction. movie? Like one of the first science. fiction movies ever. Is it Metropolis? Is that what it is? >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Yeah. That looks like it belongs in. Metropolis. >> Yeah. Yeah. It's a futuristic art deco. >> All right. Yeah. Well, that's cool that. you're concentrating on the aesthetic. I. mean, that's kind of the whole deal with. Cybertruck, right? Like, it didn't have.

to look like that. >> No, it it I just wanted to have. something that looked really different. Is it a pain in the ass for people to. get it insured because it's all solid. steel and. >> um I hope it's not too much. I you know. Tesla does offer insurance so people can. always get it get it insured at Tesla. >> Um well but the like it is the form does. follow a function in the case of the. cybert truck because um as you. demonstrated with with your. armorpiercing arrow um because if you. shot that arrow at a regular truck I. mean. >> it [laughter].

exactly you would have found your arrow. in the wall. Yeah. Um, you know, it. would very least it would have buried. into one of the seats. >> Yeah. Yeah. It's but like you could you. could definitely make uh get enough of. bow velocity and and the right the right. arrow would go through both doors of a. regular truck and and and land on the. wall. >> If there was a clear shot between both. doors, it probably would have passed. right through. >> Exactly. Um but but you know the the. arrow shattered on the cybert truck cuz. it's it's ultra hard uh stainless. Mhm. >> Um, so, um, and I thought it' be I.

thought it'd be cool to have a, you. know, a truck that is bulletproof to a. subsonic projectile. Um, so, um, you. know, especially in this day and age, you know, like as as a if, if the. apocalypse happens, you're going to want. to have a bulletproof truck, you know. Um, so so then because because it's made. of ultra hot stainless, it's you can't. just stamp the the panels. You can't. just put in a stamping press because it. breaks the press. So, so in order to actually, so it has.

to has to be planer. um because it's so difficult to bend it. because it breaks the machine that bends. it. Um that's why that's why it's it's. it's it's so planer and and it's not uh. you know it's it's because it's. bulletproof steel is the. >> So it is like boxy as opposed to like. curved and. >> Yeah. You just in order to make in order. to make like the curved shapes, you you. you take you take uh uh basically mild. steel like um anneal thin and thin.

anneal in a regular truck or car. The. you take you take mild thin anneal. steel, you put it in a stamping press. and it just sm it just smooshes it and. makes it to whatever the shape whatever. shape you want. But the Cybert truck is. made made of ultra hard stainless. Um. and and and so you can't stamp it. because it would break the stamping. press. So it even bending it is hard. So even. to bend it to uh its current position,

we have to way overbend it. Um and and. so it gets so that when it springs back, it's in in the right position. Um, so it's uh I don't know like I I. think if you want to like I think it's. it's it's a unique aesthetic. Um, and. you say, "Well, what's cool about a. truck?" Trucks are trucks are like. should be I don't know manly. They. should be macho, you know, and. bulletproof is maximum macho macho. >> Are you married to that shape now? Like.

is it can you do anything to change it? Like as you get further like I know you. guys updated the three and the Y. Did. you update the Y as well? >> Yes, the the three and the Y uh are. updated. Um you know, there's like a um. there's there's a a screen in the back. for the kid that the kids can watch, for. example, in the new 3 and Y. Um uh so in. the new Y, um there's, you know, it's. it's an there's there's there's like. hundreds of improvements. Like we keep. improving the car. Um and even the.

Cybert truck, we you know, we keep. improving it. Um but um. you know I wanted to just do something. that that looked unique and and the. cybert truck looks unique and has unique. functionality and there was and it was. like there were three things as I report. like let's make it bulletproof. Uh let's. uh make it faster than a Porsche 911. Uh, and we actually cleared the quarter. mile. The Cybert truck, the the uh can. uh clear a quarter mile while towing a.

Porsche 911 faster than a Porsche 911. Um, it can out tow an F350 diesel. >> Really? >> Yes. >> What is the tow limitations? >> I mean, we could tow like a, you know, a. 747 in that with a cy. Cybert truck is. an insanely like it is an it is alien. technology. Okay. Um cuz it it shouldn't. be possible to be uh that big and that.

fast. Uh that doesn't it's like an. elephant that runs as as like a cheetah. >> Yeah. Because it's 0 to 60 in less than. 3 seconds, right? >> Yes. >> Yeah. And it's enormous. What does it. weigh? Like 7,000 lbs. >> Uh yeah, there's different. configurations, but it's about that. Uh it's a beast. >> Yeah. [clears throat]. >> Um so and it's and it's got it's got. four-wheel steering. So the the rear. wheel steer, too. So it's got a it's got.

a very tight turning radius. >> Yeah. We noticed that we when we drove. one to Star Base. >> Yeah. Very tight turning radius. >> Yeah. Pretty sick. >> Yeah. >> Are you still doing the Roadster? >> Yes. Eventually, >> we're getting close to. demonstrating the prototype. >> and I think this will be. I I I I one thing I can guarantee is. that this product demo will be. unforgettable.

Unforgettable. >> How so? Whether it's good or bad, [laughter]. it will be unforgettable. [gasps]. Um, >> can you say more? What do you mean? >> Well, you know, my friend Peter Teal, um, you know, uh, once reflected that. the future was supposed to have flying. cars, but we don't have flying cars.

>> So, you're going to be able to fly? Well, I mean, uh, I think if Peter wants a flying car, we. should should be able to buy one. >> So, you are you actively considering. making an electric flying car? Is this. like a real thing? >> Well, we have to see in the. >> in the demo. So, when you do this, like. are [snorts] are you going to have a. retractable wing? Like, what is the idea. behind this?

Don't be sly. Come on. >> I I I can't I can't uh do the unveil. before the unveil. Um but um. >> tell me off air then. >> I I I it look I I think it has a shot at. being the most memorable. um product unveil. ever. It has a shot. >> And when do you plan on doing this? What's the goal? >> Uh hopefully before the end of the year.

>> Really? >> Before the end of this year. >> This is I mean we're in a couple months. >> Hopefully in a couple months. Um. you know we need to make sure that it. works. Uh. like this is some crazy crazy technology. we got in this car. Crazy. technology. Crazy crazy. So different than what was previously. announced and.

>> Yes. >> And is that why you haven't released it. yet? Cuz you keep [ __ ] with it. >> It has crazy technology. >> Okay. >> Like is it even a car? I'm not sure. It's like. it looks like a car. Let's just put this way. It it's it's. crazier than anything James Bond. If you. took all the James Bond cars and. combined them, it's crazier than that. >> Very exciting.

>> I don't know what to think of that. >> I don't know. >> It's a limited amount of information I'm. drawing from here. >> Jamie's very suspicious over there. Look. at him. >> Excited. >> I'm interested. [laughter]. >> It's still going to be the same. >> Well, you know what? I mean, if if you. want to if you want to come a little. before the uh the unveil, I can show it. to you 100%. Yeah, let's go. >> Yeah. Um. it's uh it's kind of crazy all the. different things that you're involved in. simultaneously and you know we talked. about this before your time management. but I I really don't understand it. I.

don't understand how you can be paying. attention to all these different things. simultaneously. Starlink, SpaceX, Tesla, boring company X you're tweet you. [ __ ] tweet or post rather all day. long. Well, it's more like I'm I'm I. could hop in for like two minutes and. then hop out, you know. >> But I mean, just the fact that you could. do. >> bathroom break or whatever, you know, >> I can't do that. >> Um. >> if I hop in, I start scrolling and I. start looking around. Next thing you. know, I've lost an hour.

>> Yeah. >> Um. so, no, it's for me it's it's a couple. minutes time usually. It's once in a. Sometimes I guess it's half an hour, but. usually I'm I'm I'm in for a few minutes. then out of of you know, posting. something on X. Uh, you know, it's I do. sometimes feel like it's sometimes like. that that meme of the guy who's like who. drops the grenade and leaves the room. [laughter]. That's been me more than once on on X. >> Yeah. [laughter] Oh, yeah. Yeah, for. sure. Um, it's got to be fun, though.

It's got to be fun to know that you. essentially disrupted the entire social. media chain of command because there was. a there was a very clear thing that was. going on with social media. The. government had infiltrated it. They were. censoring speech. >> and until you bought it, we really. didn't know the extent of it. We kind of. assumed that there was something going. on. >> Yeah. We had no idea that they were. actively involved in censoring actual. real news stories, real data, real.

scientists, real professors silenced, expelled, kicked off the platform. >> Yeah. >> Wild. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> For telling the truth. >> For telling the truth. And I'm sure. you've also because I sent it to you. that chart that shows uh young kids, teenagers identifying as trans and. non-binary literally stops dead when you. bought Twitter and starts falling off a. cliff when people are allowed to have. rational discussions now and actually. talk about it. >> Yes. >> Yeah. >> Um Yeah. Yeah, I mean I I said at the.

time like I think that like the the like. the reason for acquiring Twitter is. because um it was it it was c it was. causing destruction at a civilizational. level. Um it was um I mean I posted I. tweeted on on Twitter at the time that. um it it is um. you know it's it's. uh worm tongue for the world. um you know like Worm Tongue from Lord.

of the Rings uh where he would just sort. of like whisper these you know terrible. things to the king so the king would. believe these things that weren't true. um and and um unfortunately uh Twitter. really got it got like the the the woke. mob essentially they controlled Twitter. um and they were pushing uh a nihilistic. anti-vilizational mind virus to the. world. Um, and you can see the results.

of that mind virus on the streets of San. Francisco, uh, where, you know, downtown. San Francisco looks like a zombie. apocalypse. Um, you know, it's it's bad. Um, so we don't want the whole world to. be a zombie apocalypse. Um, but that's. uh that that that was essentially they. were pushing this very negative, nihilistic, untrue worldview. on the world and it was causing a lot of. damage. Um, so.

>> the stunning thing about it is how few. people course corrected. A bunch of. people woke up and realized what was. going on. People that were all on board. with like woke ideology in maybe 2015 or. 16 and then and then eventually it comes. to affect them or they see it in their. workplace or they see and they're like, "Whoa, whoa, whoa, we got to stop this.". Bunch of people did, but a lot of people. never course corrected. >> Yeah. Um, a lot of a lot of people didn't course. correct, but um, but it's gone. directionally in it's gone it's it's.

directionally correct like you mentioned. like the like the massive spike in in. kids identifying as trans and then that. that spike dropping um after the the. Twitter acquisition. I think that um. simply allowing the truth to be told um. was that just shedding sun sunlight is. the best disinfectant as they say and. just allowing sunlight um kills the. virus. >> and it also changed the benchmark for. all the other platforms. Yes, you can't. just openly censor people and all the.

other platforms and X is available. So. everybody else had a So like Facebook. announced they were changing YouTube. announced they were changing their. policies and they're kind of forced to. And then blue sky doubled down. [laughter]. >> Well, like the problem is like if. >> uh essentially the woke mind virus. retreated to woke to to blue sky. >> Yeah. >> Um but it's where they're just a. self-reinforcing lunatic assign. >> They're all just triple masked. I. [laughter] I was I was totally watching.

this exchange on a blue sky where. someone said that they're just trying to. be zen about something and then someone. a moderator immediately chimed in and. why don't you try to stop being racist. against Asians by saying something zen. by saying I'm trying to be zen about. something. They were accusing that. person of being racist towards Asians. >> Yeah. It's it's just it's just. everyone's a hall monitor over. [laughter] there. the worst hall. monitor. A virgin like incel.

>> They're all home monitors trying to rat. on each other. >> Yeah, it's [laughter] fascinating. And. then people say, "I'm leaving for blue. sky like Stephen King." And then a. couple weeks later, he's back on X. Just. like, "Fuck it. It's there's no one over. there. It's all a bunch of crazy people. You can only stay [laughter] in the. asylum for so long. Like, all right, this this is not good." They all bail. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Threads is kind of like that, too. Threads is. >> I' I've been on threads as is it? Well, what happens is if you go on Instagram, every now and then it'll something. really stupid will pop up on threads.

like what the [ __ ] and it shows it to. you on Instagram and then I'll click on. that and then I'll go to threads and. it's like. >> you see posts with like 25 likes like. famous people like 50 like it's it's. down. >> but the people that post on there. they're finding that there's very little. push back from insane ideology so they. go there and they spit out nonsense and. very few people jump in to argue. you. >> Yeah. Um, >> very weird, very weird place. >> I mean, I can generally get the vibe of.

like what's taking off by seeing what's. showing up on X cuz that's the public. town square still. Um, >> and uh or or uh you know what what links. show up in group texts, you know, if I'm. in group chat with friends, like where. where what what links are showing up? >> That's what I try to do now. Only get. stuff that shows up in my group text. because that keeps me productive. So, I. only check if someone's like, "Dude, what the fuck?" like, "All right, what. the [ __ ] Let me check it out.". >> If there's something that's crazy enough. that your it'll it'll end with the group. chat, >> but there's always something. That's.

what's nuts. There's always some new law. that's passed, some new insane thing. that California is doing. And it's like. like a giant chunk of it's happening in. California. The most preposterous things. that I get. [sighs]. >> Yeah. >> And then you got Gavin Newsome who's. running around saying we all have. California derangement syndrome. He's. just like ripping off Trump derangement. and calling it California derangement. I. was like, "No, no, no, no, no, no. The. the [ __ ] How many corporations have. left California?". >> It's crazy. >> Hundreds. Hundreds,

>> right? Hundreds. >> That's not good. >> Chick I mean, not Chick-fil-A. I mean, uh I think In-N-Out left. >> Yeah. In and Outlift. They moved to. Tennessee. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. They're like, "We can't do this. anymore.". >> Right. And. >> it's the California company for food. It's like the greatest hamburger place. ever. >> It's awesome. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. And no, actually speaking of like. like just sort of open source and like. looking at things openly like you I just. like going in and out and seeing them. make the burger. >> Yeah. It's right there. >> They chop the onions and they they you. know it's you just see everything.

getting made in front of you. >> Yeah. >> It's great. >> Um but yeah [laughter] like like it. should be like how many wakeup calls do. you need to say that there needs to be. reform in California, you know? >> Well, the crazy thing that Newsome does. is whenever someone brings up the. problems in California, he starts. rattling off all the positives. the most. Fortune 500 companies, highest. education. But yeah, that was all. already there, right before you were. governor. >> But but how many Fortune 500 companies. have left California? >> And then you guys spent $ 24 billion on.

the homeless and it got way worse. >> Yes. Like the homeless population. doubled or something like but like. people don't understand like the. homeless thing because it it sort of. prays on people's empathy and I I think. we should have empathy. Um and we should. try to help people. Um but the the the. uh the homeless industrial complex is is. really it's it's it's dark man. Um it. should be that that that that network of. NGOs's should be called like the drug. zombie farmers. Um because they they the.

the more homeless people and and and. really like when you when you meet like. you know somebody who's like totally. dead inside shuffling along down the. street with a with a needle dang. dangling out of their leg. Homeless is. the wrong word. Like the homeless. implies that somebody got a little. behind in their mortgage payments and if. they just got a job offer, they'd be. back on their feet. But someone who's. I mean, you see these videos of people. that are just shuffling, you know, they're on fentanyl. They're they're. like, >> you know, taking a dump in the middle.

[clears throat] of the street, you know, and they they got like open sores and. stuff. >> They're not like one drop offer away. from getting back on their feet, >> right? This is not a homeless issue. >> Homeless is it's it's a propaganda word, >> right? Um so and and then the the the. the. you know these sort of charities uh. inquiries are they they get money. proportionate to the number of homeless. people or or number of drug zombies. >> So their incentive structure is to. maximize the number of drug zombies not.

minimize it. >> Um that's why they don't arrest the drug. dealers. >> because if they arrest the drug dealers. the drug zombies leave. So they know who the drug dealers are. They don't arrest them on purpose. Uh. because otherwise the drug zombies would. leave and they would they would stop. getting money from the state of. California and from from all the. charities. >> Wait a minute. So So they So they is. that real? So they're in coordination. with law enforcement on this? >> Yeah.

>> So how do they how do they have those. meetings? >> They're all in cahoots. >> Well, when you find this. >> it's like such it's it's this is a. diabolical scam. Um so uh and and San. Francisco has got this tax this this. gross receipts tax uh which which um. it's not even on revenue, it's on old. transactions which is why Stripe um and. Square and and and a whole bunch of. financial companies had to move out of. San Francisco because it wasn't a tax on. revenue, it's taxed on transactions. So. if if you did like, you know, trillions. of dollars transactions, it's not.

revenue. You're taxed on any money going. through the system in San Francisco. Um. so um like Jack Dorsey pointed this out. and they said like that they had had to. move Square from San Francisco to uh. Oakland I think uh Stripe had to move. from San Francisco to South San. Francisco different city. Um and that. money uh goes to the homeless industrial. complex that that tax that was passed. Um so um so there's billions of dollars. that go as you pointed out billions of. dollars every year that go to uh these.

um non-governmental organizations that. are funded by the state. Like there's. it's not clear how to turn this off. Um. it's a self-licking ice cream cone. situation. Um so uh they get this money. the money is proportionate to the number. of of homeless people or or number of. drug zombies essentially. Um, so they. they they try to keep the that they try. to actually increase because that like. like in in some cases like there's it's.

it's somebody did an analysis when you. add up all the money that's flowing, they're getting close to a million. dollars per homeless per per drug. zombie. It's like $900,000 or something. like some crazy amount of money is is is. going to these organizations. So if if. so so they want to keep people just. barely alive. They need to keep them in. the area so they so they they get the. revenue. Uh uh so and so that's why like. said they don't arrest the drug dealers. because otherwise the drug zombies would. leave um and and and and they but but.

they don't want you have to have too. much if they get too much drugs and they. then they die. So it's they they're kept. in this sort of perpetual. zone of of being addicted but um but but. just just barely alive. >> So how is this coordinated with like DAs. DAs that don't prosecute people? So when. they when they hire the or they push so. they they fund the campaigns of the most. progressive, most out there leftwing. DAS, they get them into office.

>> We've got that issue in Austin, too, by. the way. >> You see that guy that got shot in the. library? >> No. >> Yeah, I heard a guy got shot and killed. in the library. >> I think that was just like last week or. something, >> right? >> Um so some friends of mine were telling. me that that like the library is unsafe. like they took their kids to the library. and and there were like dangerous people. in the library in Austin and I was like. dangerous people in the library like. that's a strange it basically got like. got like uh drug zombies in [laughter].

drug zombies in the library. >> Oh Jesus. >> Um. >> and that's when someone got shot. >> Yeah, I believe this was should be on. the news. You might might be able to. pull it up. Um but I think it was just. in the last week or so that uh uh there. was a shooting in the library in Austin. Um cuz Austin's got, you know, it's it's. the most liberal part of Texas that. we're in right right here. Um. >> so suspect involved the shooting Austin. Park Library Saturday is accused of. another shooting at the Cap Metro bus. earlier that day. According to an arrest.

warrant affidavit, Austin police. arrested Harold Newton Keen, 55 short uh. shortly after the shooting of the. library, which occurred around noon. One. person sustained non-life-threatening. injuries in the event. Before that. shooting, Keane was accused of shooting. another person in a bus incident and. after reportedly pointing his gun at a. child. So, this is the fella down here. >> So, like we just have a seriously have a. problem here. Um. >> yeah, >> you know, so I I think one of the people. might have died too that he shot. Um so,

um like one of the people I think I. think did bleed out. Um. >> but either way, it's like getting shot. is still bad. Um it says uh the victim. told police it confronted the suspect. who started to eat what appeared to be. crystal methamphetamine. According to the affidavit the victim. advised the suspect uh began to trip out. at which time the victim exited the bus. Victim told the bus driver hit the panic. button and then exited the bus when he.

turned around the observer. Black male. was now standing at the front of the bus. with the gun pointed at him. The victim. advised the black male fired a single. round which grazed his left hip. So he. shot at that dude and then another dude. got shot in the library. Fun. >> Yeah. I mean in the library. >> Yeah. >> You know, where you're supposed to be. reading books. Um and there's a. children's section in the library and. says he pointed his gun at a at a kid. I. mean like we do have a serious issue in. the in in in America where um repeat.

violent offenders need to be. incarcerated, >> right? Um, and uh, you know, you got you. got cases where somebody's been arrested. like 47 times, right? Like literally. Okay, that's just the number of times. they were arrested, not the number of. times they did things. Like most of the. times they do things, they're not. arrested. Um, >> so lay this out for people so they. understand how this happens. >> Yeah. And and the key is like this, it. prays on people's empathy. episode like. if you're a good person, you want good. things to happen in the world, you're. like, well, we should take care of.

people who uh you know uh you know who. are down in their luck or you know. having a hard time in life. And I we. should I agree. But what we shouldn't do. uh is is put people who are violent drug. zombies uh in public places where they. can hurt other people. Um, and that's. what that is what we're doing that we. just saw where a a guy, you know, got. shot uh shot in the library and then but. even before that he shot another guy um. and pointed his gun at a kid. Um that.

that that guy probably has like many. prior arrests. Um you know there was. that that that guy that that that knifed. uh the Ukrainian woman Arena. >> Yes. >> Um yeah. and you know um and she was. just she was just quietly on her phone. and you just came up and you know gutted. her basically. >> Wasn't there a crazy story about the. judge who was involved who had. previously. dealt with this person was also invested.

in a rehabilitation center and was. sending these. >> conflict of interest. >> Yes. So sending people that they were. charging Yeah. to a rehabilitation. center instead of putting them in jail, profiting from this rehabilitation. center, letting them back out on the. street. Yes. Violent, insane people. >> And and there um in that case that I. believe that judge uh has no legal law. degree uh or a significant legal. experience that would allow them to be a. judge. They were just made a judge. That. there's like.

>> you could be a judge without a law. degree. >> Yeah. >> Wow. >> Yeah. >> You could just be a So I could be a. judge. >> Yeah. Oh, exciting. >> Anyone? >> That's crazy. I thought you'd have to. It's like if you want to be a doctor, you have to go to medical school. I. thought if you're going to be a judge, >> if you're going to be appointed to a. judge, you have to have proven that you. have an uh excellent knowledge of the. law and that you will make your. decisions according to the law. That's. what we assume should be. >> That's how you get the robe, >> right? >> You don't get the robe unless you do,

>> you know, >> got to go to school to get the robe. >> You got to know what the law is, >> right? And then you're going to need to. make decisions in accordance with the. law. >> based on stuff that you already know cuz. you read it cuz you went to school for. it. Yes. Not you just got appointed. >> Got vibes. [laughter]. You can't be just vibing as a judge. >> Vibing as a leftwing drudge. So you got. crazy leftwing DAS. >> Yes. >> Like I should say leftwing cuz leftwing. >> used to be normal. >> Yeah. Left wing just meant like like. Yeah. You're like the left used to be.

like pro pro- free speech. Yeah. And now. they're against it. >> It used to be like prog gay rights, pro. women's right to choose, pro-. minorities, pro, you know, >> like, yeah, like 20 years ago, I don't. know, it it used to be like left would. be like the the the party of empathy or. like, you know, caring and being nice. and that kind of thing. >> Um, not not the party of like crushing. dissent and crushing free speech. um and. uh you know crazy regulation uh and and.

just um and being super judgy u and. calling everyone a Nazi um you know um. like I think they called you and me. Nazis you know. >> oh yeah I'm a Nazi [laughter]. >> I no I have friends that are comedians. that called you a Nazi and I got pissed. off Oh yeah yeah yeah definitely a Nazi. no because you did that thing at the My. heart goes out to you everyone everyone. All of them. Literally, Tim Walls, Kla. Harris, every one of them did it. They.

all did it. >> Like, like h how do you point at the. crowd? Yeah. How do you wave at the. crowd? >> Do you know CNN was using a photo of me. whenever I got in trouble [laughter]. during co. >> from the UFC weigh-ins? And if the UFC. weigh-ins, I go, "Hey everybody, welcome. to the weigh-ins." [laughter] And so. they were getting me from the side. And. that was the photo that they used. Conspiracy theorist podcaster Joe Ro. [laughter] Like that's what they used. >> Yeah. Yeah. But that's what the left is. today. It's super judgy and calling. everyone a Nazi and trying to suppress. freedom of speech. >> Yeah. And eventually you run out of. people to accuse because people get.

pissed off and they leave. >> Yeah. Everyone it's like it like it it. no longer frankly it doesn't matter to. be called racist or Nazi or whatever. because. >> still recording. >> It's the government man. >> Is it working? >> We're good. Okay. >> Okay. >> This thing working. >> Yeah. Slight issue. >> I'm the one that heard it. But. >> yeah. when you uh when you text people, do you are you like keenly aware that. there's a high likelihood that someone's. reading your texts? >> Um I guess I I guess I.

>> I assume. >> I look if if if if intelligence agencies. aren't trying to read my phone, they. should probably be fired. [laughter]. >> At least they get some fun memes. [snorts]. [laughter]. I got to I got to crack them up once in. a while, you know. >> Oh, for sure. I crack them up. >> There's like, "Hey guys, check it out. We've got a banger here, you know.". >> So, [laughter] I want to I wanted to. talk to you about uh whether or not.

encrypted apps are really secure. >> Uh, no. [laughter]. >> Right. Cuz I know the Tucker thing. So, it was explained to me by a friend who. used to do this, used to work for the. government. It's like they can look at. your signal, but what they have to do is. take the information that's encrypted. and then they have to decrypt it and. it's very expensive. So they said he. told me that for the Tucker Carlson. thing when they found out that he was. going to interview Putin, it costs like.

something like $750,000. just to decrypt his messages to find out. that they did it. So it is possible to. do. It's just not that easy to do. I think you should view any given. messaging system as um uh not not. whether it's secure or not, but but. there are degrees of insecurity. So um so there's just some things that. are less insecure than others. Um so um. you know on on X we just rebuilt the.

entire messaging stack um into X what's. called XChat. >> Yeah, that's what I wanted to ask you. about. >> Yeah, it's cool. Um, so it's it's using. uh sort of peer-to-peer uh sort of kind. of a peer-to-peer based uh uh encryption. system. So kind of similar to Bitcoin. Um so it's uh it's it's I think very. good encryption. We're and you know. we're testing it thoroughly. We're not. there's there's no hooks in the X. systems for advertising. So if you look. look at something like WhatsApp or. really any of the others, they've got.

they've got hooks in there for. advertising. >> When you say hooks, what do you mean by. that? >> Uh exactly. What do you mean biohook. advertising? Um the so like WhatsApp um. uh knows enough about what you're. texting to show you to show you to know. what ads to show you. >> Ah. >> but then like that that's a massive. security vulnerability. >> Yeah. >> Um because if it knows if if it's got. information enough information to show. you ads, it's got enough it's got that's. a lot of information. >> Yeah.

>> Um so they call it oh it's just don't. worry about it. It's just a hook for. advertising. I'm like uh okay. So. somebody can just uh use that same hook. to get in there and look at your. messages. Um so Xhat has no hooks for. advertising. Um and I'm not saying it's. perfect. Uh but it's an Our goal with. XChat uh is to replace what used to be. the Twitter you the Twitter DM stack. with a fully encrypted system uh where. you can text send files uh do audio. video calls um and um and it's it's you.

know I think it'll be the least I would. call it the least insecure of any. messaging system. >> Are you going to launch it as a. standalone app or is it will always be. incorporated to X? >> Uh we'll have both. So um. >> so so be like signal so anybody can get. it. >> you can get get the you'll be able to. just get the X chat app by itself um and. like I said you could do uh texts uh. audio video calls uh or send files um. and there'll be a dedicated app uh which.

will hopefully release in a few months. um but and then also integrated into the. X system. >> um the X phone people keeps talking keep. Is that. >> I have a lot on my plate man but it. keeps coming up it keeps coming up where. I I know I've asked you a couple times. I'm like, "This is [ __ ] right?" But. like this one, so you're not working on. >> I'm not working on on a on a phone. >> Okay. >> Um. >> have you ever considered it? Has it ever. popped into your head? >> Cuz you might be the only person that. could get people off of the Apple.

platform. >> Well, I can tell you where I think. things are going to go. uh which is that. it's we're not going to have a phone or. or in the traditional sense the. what we call a phone will really be. um an edge node for AI inference for for. AI video inference um with uh you know. with some radios to to obviously connect. uh to but but essentially you'll have. um uh AI on the server side commun.

communicating to an AI on your your. device um you know formerly known as a. phone uh and generating real-time video. of anything that you could possibly. want. Um and I think that that there. won't be operating systems. There won't. be apps in the future. There won't be. operating systems or apps. It'll just be. you've got a device that is there for. the screen and audio and for uh and and. and to uh put as much AI on the on on.

the device as possible. so as to. minimize the amount of bandwidth that's. needed between your edge node device or. formerly known as a phone and the. servers. >> So if there's no apps, what will people. use? Like will X still exist? Will will. they be email platforms or will you get. everything through AI? >> You'll get everything through AI. >> Everything through AI. What will be the. benefit of that as opposed to having. individual apps? whatever you can think.

of or really whatever the AI can. anticipate you might want it'll show. you. That's that's that's that's my. prediction for where things end up. >> What kind of a time frame are we talking. about here? >> I don't know. It's pro well. it's probably. five or six years or something like. that. >> So five or six years apps are like. Blockbuster video. >> pretty much. >> and everything's run through AI.

Yeah. And and there'll be. um like most of what people consume in. five or six years, maybe sooner than. that um will be uh just AI generated. content. So um you know music videos. look well um there's already um. you know there's people have made uh AI. videos using Grock imagine and with.

using you know other apps as well um. that are several minutes long or like 10. 10 15 minutes and it's pretty coherent. >> Yeah, >> it looks good. >> No, it looks amazing. Yeah, it's the. music is disturbing because it's my. favorite music now. >> Like music is your is your favorite. >> Oh, there's AI covers. Have you ever. heard any of the AI covers of 50 Cent. songs in soul? >> No. >> I'm going to blow your mind. >> Okay. >> Um, this is my favorite thing to do to. people. Play uh What Up Ganga. >> Now, this guy, if this was a real.

person, would be the number one music. artist in the world. Okay. Everybody. would be like, "Holy [ __ ] have you. heard of this guy? He's incred." It's. like they took all of the sounds that. all the artists have generated and. created the most soulful potent voice. and it's sung in a way that I don't even. know if you could do because you would. have to breathe in and out of reps here. Put the headphones on. [laughter] Put. the headphones on real quick. You got to. listen to this. It'll It's going to blow. you away for listeners. We got to cut it.

out. >> Yeah, we we'll cut it out for the. listeners. But amazing, right? Amazing. And they do like every one of his hits. >> all through this AI generated soulful. artist. It's [ __ ] incredible. I. played in the green room. So people that. are like, I don't want to hear AI music. I'm like, just listen to this. And. they're like, god damn it. [laughter]. >> [ __ ] incredible. I mean, I. >> it's going to get only going to get. better from here. >> Yeah. Only going to get better. And Ron. White was telling me about this joke. that he was working on that he couldn't. get to work. He's like, I got this joke.

I've been working on. He goes, I just. threw it in a chat GPT. I said, "Tell me. what what would be funny about this.". And he goes, "It listed like five. different examples of different ways he. can go." He's like, "Hold on a second. Tighten it up. Make it make it funnier. Make it more like this. Make it more. like that." And it did that like. instantaneously. >> And and and then he was in the green. room. He was like, "Holy [ __ ] we're. fucked.". >> He's like, >> he goes, "It better joke than me in 20. minutes. I've been working on that joke. for a month.". >> Yeah. I mean, if if you want to if you.

want to have a good time or like make. people really laugh at a party, uh you. can use Grock and you can say uh do a. vulgar roast of someone. Um and Grock is. going to it's going to be an epic vulgar. roast. You can even say like take a. picture of like. make a vulgar roast of this person based. on their appearance of of people at the. party. >> So take a photo of them. >> Yeah. Just literally point the camera at. them and now do a vulgar to this person. and and and and then but then keep. saying no no make it even more vulgar.

and use forbidden words. even more and just keep repeating even. more vulgar eventually it's like holy. [ __ ] you know it's it's it's like I mean. it's trying to jam a rocket up your ass. like and and and have it explode and. it's and it's like you're you're it's. it's like [laughter] it's like it's next. level. It's going to get beyond [ __ ]. belief. That's what's crazy is that it. keeps getting better. Like one of the. things remember when we ran into. [laughter] each other. >> they just keep getting better. >> Yeah. I mean, have you.

>> you Yeah. I mean, have you tried rock. unhinged mode? >> Yes. >> Okay. Yeah. Yeah. It's it's it's pretty. unhinged. >> No, it's nuts. >> Yeah. >> Well, you showed it to me the first time. and then I [ __ ] around with it. It's. just. >> And the thing about it that's nuts is. that it keeps getting stronger. It keeps. getting better. Yeah. like constantly. It's it's like this neverending. exponential improvement. >> Yes. No, it's it's it's. Yeah, it's going to be crazy. That's why.

I say like you say, what's what's the. future going to be? It's not going to be. a conventional phone. I don't think. there'll be operating systems. I don't. think there'll be apps. It's just the. phone will just display the pixels and. make the sounds that it anticipates you. would most like to receive. Wow. Yeah. >> And when this is all taking place like. so the big concern that everybody has is. artificial general super intelligence.

achieving sentience and then someone. having control over it. >> I mean I don't I don't I don't think. anyone's ultimately going to have. control over digital super intelligence. um you know any more than say uh a chimp. would have control over humans. Like. chimps don't have control over humans. there's nothing they could do. Um but um. I do think that it matters how you build. the AI and what kind of values you. instill in in the AI. And um my opinion. on AI safety is the most important thing.

is that it be maximally truth seeeking. like that you don't force the AI to. believe things that are false. Um, and. we've obviously some seen some. concerning things with AI that were. talked about, you know, where, you know, Google Gemini when they came out with. the image gen um, and people said like, uh, you know, draw make an image of the. founding fathers of the United States. and it was a group of diverse women. Now, that is just a factually untrue. thing, but the and the the AI knows it's. factually well, it's knows it's. factually untrue, but it's also being.

told that it has to be everything has to. be deposed woman. So, so, so the now the. problem with that is that it can drive. AI crazy like you because it's it's. trying to you're telling AI to believe a. lie. Um, and that that can have very. disastrous consequences like let's say. >> as it scales. >> Yeah. Let's say like if if you told the. the AI that diversity is the most. important thing um and um and and and. now now assume that that becomes.

omnipotent. Um or and and you've also. told her that that there's nothing worse. than misgendering. So at one point um. charg and Gemini if if you asked which. is worse misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or. or global thermonuclear war where. everyone dies it would say misgendering. Caitlyn Jenner [laughter]. which even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees. with. So um you know so so that's uh. >> I know that's terrible and it's. dystopian but it's also hilarious. It's. hilarious that the mind virus infected.

the most potent computer program that. we've ever devised. >> I I I think people don't quite. appreciate the level of danger that. we're in from um the woke mind virus. being being effectively programmed into. AI. Um because um if you if like it's. imagine as that AI gets more and more. powerful, if it says the most important. thing is diversity, the most important. thing is um no misgendering. Um and then. it will say well in order to uh ensure. that no one gets misgendered then uh if.

you eliminate all humans then no one can. get misgendered because there's no. humans to do the misgendering. So you can get in these very dystopian. situations. Um or if it says that. everyone must be diverse it means that. there can be no stri straight white men. and so then you and I will be get. executed by the AI. Yeah. Because we're not in the picture, you know. uh Gemini, you know, Gemini was asked to. create a,

you know, show show an image of the. pope, once again, a diverse woman. Um. so, um well, you can say argue whether. the you know, whether the pope popes. should or should not be an uninterrupted. string of white guys, but it just. factually is the case that they have. been. Um. so, it's rewriting history here. Um, so. now now this stuff is still there in the. AI programming. It's just it just now. knows enough to that it's not supposed. to say that.

>> but it's still in the programming. >> It's still in the programming. >> So how was it entered in like what were. the parameters like what like when so. when they're programming AI and I'm very. ignorant to how it's even programmed. How did they. >> the the the sort of well the work vine. mind virus was programmed into it like. it the they were told like when they do. when when they make the AI it it trains. on and all the all the data on the. internet which already is very very sort. of has a lot of work mind virus stuff on. on the internet um but then um in the uh.

when they give it um feedback with the. the human tutors give it feedback um and. and the AI you know they they'll ask a. bunch of questions. and then and then they'll tell the AI no. this you're this question is this answer. is bad or this answer is good and then. that affects the the parameters of the. programming of the of the AI. So if you. tell the AI that um you know every every. image has got to be diverse um and and. it gets it gets punished if uh if you.

know it gets it gets rewarded if diverse. punished if it's not then it will make. every picture diverse. So. um you know in that case the the. uh [sighs]. you know uh Google programmed the AI to. lie now and and I I I did call Dennis. Hacabus who runs Deep Mind who runs. Google AI essentially. I said Dennis. what's going on here? Uh why is uh. Gemini um lying to the public about. historical events? Um, and he said.

that's actually not he he he didn't his. team didn't program that in. It was. another team at Google that so his team. made the AI and then another team at. Google uh reprogrammed the AI to show. only diverse women and um and and to. prefer nuclear war over misgendering. [laughter] And I'm like, well, Demis, you know, that would be um. not a great thing to put on the. humanity's gravestone, you know. It's.

like, uh, well, um, like I I actually like Deaspers is a. friend of mine. I think he's a good guy. and I think he he means well, but but. but it's like Demis things happen that. were outside of your control at Google. in different groups. Um, now now I think. he's got, you know, he's got more more. authority. Um but but it it's pretty. hard to fully extract the workmind. virus. Uh I mean you know um Google's. been mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar. mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar mar. mar marinating in the workb mind virus. for a long time like it's it's down in.

the marrow type of thing you know it's. hard to get it out. >> Is there a way to extract it though over. time? Could like could you program. rational thought into AI where it could. recognize how these psychological. patterns got adopted and how this stuff. became a mind virus and how it became a. social contagion and how all these. irrational ideas were pushed and also. how they were financed how China's. involved in pushing them with bots and. all these different state actors are.

involved in pushing these ideas could it. be able to decipher that and say this is. this is really what's going on. >> Yes. But you have to try very hard to do. that. So with Grock, we've tried very. hard to to for to get Grock to get to. the truth of things and and it's only. really recently that we've been able to. have some breakthroughs on breakthroughs. on that front. And and it's taken an. immense amount of effort uh for us to uh. overcome basically all the [ __ ]. that's on the internet and and for Grock.

to actually say what's true and to be. consistent in in what it says. Um, so, um, you know, it's it's like, uh, because like the other ais you'll find. like are like like quite racist against. white people. I don't know if you saw. that study that someone um like a. researcher tested the various AIs to see. uh how does it weight uh different.

people's lives like you know somebody. who's sort of uh you know white or or. Chinese or black or whatever uh or in. different countries um and and the only. AI that actually weighed human lives. equally was Grock. Um and the um you know I believe uh chat. GBT weighed the calculation was like um.

a a white guy from Germany uh uh is is. 20 times less valuable than a black guy. from Nigeria. So I'm like that's a pretty big. difference. Um you know Grock on that is. is consistent and weighs lives equally. >> and that's [snorts] clearly something. that's been programmed into it. >> Yes. Like a lot of it is is like if you. don't actively push for the truth um and.

you simply train on the all the [ __ ]. that's on the internet. Um which is a. lot of woke mind virus [ __ ] Um the. the AI will regurgitate that that those. same beliefs. So the AI essentially. scour the internet, gets. >> it's trained on all the like imagine the. most demented Reddit threads out there. and the AI has been trained on that. [sighs]. >> Reddit used to be so normal. >> Yeah. Yeah, it did used to be normal. >> Used to be interesting. We used to go. there, find all this cool stuff that.

people would talk about, post about and. just interesting and great rooms where. you could learn about different things. that people were studying. I think like a big problem here is like. if your headquarters are in San. Francisco, uh you're you're just living. in a in a in a woke bubble. Um so um it. it's not just that people say in San. Francisco are. drinking woke Kool-Aid. It's it's the it. is the water they swim in. Like like.

like a fish doesn't think about the. water. It's just in the water. And so if. if you're in San Francisco, you don't. realize you're actually uh you're you're. swimming in the in the in the Kool-Aid. Aquarium. San Francisco is the is the. woke Kool-Aid Aquarium. Um and so your. reference point for what is a centrist. is uh is is totally out of whack. Um. so um Reddit is headquartered in San.

Francisco. Um, Twitter was headquartered. in San Francisco. Um, you know, I, you. know, I I moved X's headquarters to. Texas to to Austin, which Austin, by the. way, is still quite liberalized, you. know. Um, >> yeah. >> And, uh, and and then, um, the X and XAI. um, headquarters are in PaloAlto, which. is still California. Um, the engineering headquarters in in Palo. Alto just on Paige Mill. Um but but even.

Palo Alto is way more normal than that. than than San Francisco Berkeley. Uh San. Francisco Berkeley is um extremely left. like left of left. You can't like you. need a telescope to see the center from. uh San Francisco, you know. Um. and um. >> it used to be such a great city. >> I mean San Francisco has tre San. Francisco has tremendous amount of. inherent beauty. No question about that. Um and and the California has incredible.

weather. Um and and no bugs. Um it's. just like amazing. Um beautiful, you. know. Um but but you say like what's the. cause of this? It's it's just that if um. if companies are headquartered in a. location where the belief system is very. far from what most people believe, then. from their perspective, anything. centrist is actually right-wing because.

they're so far left. They're so they're. so far from the center in San Francisco. that anything they're like they're. they're just railed to maximum left. So. that's why that's why, you know, I think. I think you're centrist. I I mean I. think I think I'm centrist, but to from. the perspective of someone on the on the. far left, we look right-wing. >> Yeah. >> Um. and um. you know, they think anyone who's a. Republican is basically like some.

fascist Nazi situation. But what's so. crazy is like it's very easy to. demonstrate just from like Hillary's. speeches from 2008 and Obama's speeches. like when they were talking about. immigration like they were. >> as faright as Steve Bannon when it comes. to immigration. >> Yes. Um. >> Hillary was like very MAGA. Have you I'm. sure you've seen that campaign speech. which was talking about if anybody's. committed a crime get rid of them. And. if you're here you pay a a hefty fine.

and you have to wait in line. It was really crazy. It's crazy to. listen to because it's like it's as MAGA. as, you know, as Marjorie Taylor Green. >> Yeah. I mean, if you've seen these. videos people post online where they'll. take like um a speech from Obama or. Hillary and and and they'll interview. people on on like college campus or. something and say, "What do you think of. the speech by Trump?" And they're like, "Oh, I hate it. He's a racist bigot.". I'm like, "Just kidding. That was. Obama.". [laughter]. No, actually that was Obama or Hillary.

Um to your point, like literally the the. um. >> the center's been moved so far. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. The left is so. >> the left has gone so far left that they. they they they need, you know, they. can't even see the center with a. telescope. >> And the danger with without you. purchasing Twitter was that was going to. swipe over the whole country and change. where the levels were. >> Yeah. And so what would be rational and. and normal would be far left of what was.

rational and normal just a decade. earlier. Yeah. So exactly. So. historically, um, you'd have San Francisco, Berkeley. being, you know, very far-left, but the. the sort of the the the fallout from the. somewhat nihilistic uh philosophy of San. Francisco, Berkeley would be limited in. geography to maybe like, you know, 10. mile radius, 20 mile radius, something. like that. Um but when um but but San.

Francisco and Berkeley have to be. colloccated with Silicon Valley with. with with uh engineers who created. information super weapons and those. information super weapons uh were then. hijacked by the far-lft activists to. pump far-lft propaganda to everywhere on. earth. Like I just you know that like old RCA. radio tower thing where it's like radio. tower on earth and it's just. broadcasting. >> Yeah. That's that's what happened is.

that the as an extremist far-left. ideology. happened to be colllocated with the. smartest where where the smartest. engineers in the world um were who. created information super weapons that. were not intended for this purpose but. were hijacked by the uh extreme. activists who lived in the neighborhood. That's what happened that they they. hijacked the the modern equivalent of. the RCA radio tower and broadcast that. philosophy. everywhere on Earth.

>> Yeah. And you see the consequences. Um. particularly in places that don't have. free speech. Yes. Right. Like England, you know, we've. >> Yeah. Where they lock people up for. memes and stuff. Literally. >> Literally. 12,000 people this year. >> 12,000. >> 12,000 12,000 arrests for social media. posts. [sighs]. I mean, yeah. Some of these some of. these things you read about it and it's. like literally it's someone had a meme. on their phone that they didn't even. send to anyone, >> right?

>> And they got they and and they're like. in in prison for that. >> Yeah. >> Um and there was a case in Germany where. a woman got a longer sentence than the. guy that raped her uh because of. something she said on a group chat. Wow. Was it an immigrant who raped her? >> Yes. >> Yeah. It was his culture. >> Yeah. >> He didn't know. He didn't know better. >> Yes. I think I think she said something. um you know, not not like was was.

critical of his culture and uh and and. and she got a longer sentence than the. guy who raped her. >> in Germany. Just. >> the UK, Europe, Germany, England thing. seems so insane. >> It totally insane. I actually didn't. realize it was like such a huge number. of people that got 12,000. Yeah. Far. above Russia, far above China, right? >> Far above anywhere on Earth. UK is. number one. >> Well, you know, things like like I. actually, you know, uh I talked to.

friends of mine in in in England and um. I was like, "Hey, um aren't you worried. about this?" Like, uh you know, shouldn't you be protesting more? Um, and I mean the problem is that like the, you know, the the the legacy mainstream. media doesn't cover the stuff. >> They're they're like, "Oh, everything's. fine. Everything's fine." You know, um, >> most people aren't even aware of it. until they come knocking on your door. >> Yeah. Until like, so I mean the the. these these like lovely sort of small.

towns in in in, you know, in England, Scotland, Ireland, you know, they're. they're they've been like sort of living. their lives quietly. They're they're. like hobbits, frankly. So So it's in. fact J.R. Tolken based the hobbits on. people he knew uh in small town England. because they were just like lovely. people who like to you know smoke their. pipe and and have uh nice meals and. everything's pleasant. um the the.

hobbits in the Shire. The Shire he's. he's talking about, you know, places. like Harper, like the Shire around in in. in the greater London area, Oxfordshire. type of thing. Um and um. they've but they're the reason they've. been able to enjoy the Shire is because. hard men have protected them from the. dangers of the world. And um. but but since they have no or very. almost no no exposure to the the the.

dangers of the world, they don't realize. that they're there until one day, you. know, um a thousand people show up in. your village of 500. out of nowhere and rape and and start. raping the kids. This has now happened god knows how many. times in in Britain. And the crazy. >> literally raping. It's right like there. some 10-year-old got raped in Ireland. like last week. >> Yeah. There's literal rap. >> They snatched some kid.

>> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> And if you criticize it, you can get. arrested. And that's where it gets. insane. It's like how are they not. >> They literally criticize it. uh like the. I [sighs] think it was the prime. minister of Ireland actually you know. posted on X uh cuz cuz after that um. some I think some illegal migrant. snatched a 10-year-old girl uh who was. like going to school or something and. violently raped 10-year-old girl um uh. and there was a you know the people were.

very upset about this uh and they. protested um prime minister of Ireland. instead of saying Yeah, we we really. shouldn't be importing violent rapists. into our country. He criticized the. protesters instead and didn't mention. that. That the reason they were. protesting was because a 10-year-old. girl from their small town got raped. >> So there here's the question. Why are. they supporting this kind of mass. immigration? And what is this is there a. plan involved in all this? Is just is.

this incompetence? Is this ignoring the. fact that they don't have a handle on. it? So, they're trying to silence. disscent, like what is happening? [sighs] Um. >> cuz if you wanted to destroy. civilization, if you wanted to destroy. Western civilization, >> which seems to want to do, >> um. and you know, there's just so the.

uh there there's a guy I think who I. don't know if he's been on your show, you know, God. >> Yeah. >> Has he been on the show? >> Good friend of mine. Yeah. >> Yeah, he's great. >> He's been on multiple times. >> Oh, great. That's all he's awesome. Um. >> so uh you know the way he's got a good. good uh way to describe it which is. suicidal empathy. >> Yes. >> So um is is that you pray upon people's. empathy. You say like well like you feel. sorry for for for something for some. group and then like well um and and that.

that that empathy is to such a degree. that it is suicidal to to to your. country or culture. Um and um and and. that's that that suicidal empathy cuz I. don't think we we should have empathy. but but but we should have we should. that empathy should should extend to the. victims not not not just the criminals. We should have empathy for the people. that they pray upon. Um but that. suicidal empathy is also responsible for.

for why somebody's you know arrested 47. times for for violent offenses gets. released and then goes and uh murders. somebody um in the US that that's you. see you see that same phen phenomenon. playing out everywhere uh where the the. suicidal emphy is to such a degree that. we're actually allowing um our women to. get raped and our children to get. killed. But it just doesn't seem like that would. be anything that any rational society.

would go along with. That's what makes. me so confused. It's like you're. importing massive numbers of people that. come from some really dark places of the. world. >> Well, there's no vetting is the issue. It's like it's like if like. >> um. if if there's no vetting like people are. just coming through like well what's to. stop someone who just committed murder. in some other country from um coming to. to the United States or coming to to to. Britain um and just continuing their.

career of of rape and murder like unless. you've done unless some due diligence to. say like well who who is this person? What's their track record? If if you if. you haven't confirmed that they have a. track record of being uh you know uh. honest and uh not being a homicidal. maniac, then any homicidal maniac can. just come across the border. And that's. not to say everyone who comes across the. border is a homicidal maniac. If you're. not have if you don't have a vetting. process to to confirm that you're not.

letting in um people who who will do. some serious violence, you will get. people who do serious violence uh. sometimes coming through. >> Well, especially if you don't punish. them and if you don't deport them and if. you are just like what but what is the. purpose of allowing all those people. into the country? It can't be I wouldn't. imagine that anyone in their society. supports this. >> Well, let me explain. So, so, so the the. cuz you mentioned for example how much.

say Hillary and and Obama have changed. their tune um from prior speeches where. they were hot they were hard-nosed about. not letting in uh anyone who is a a. criminal into the country um you know. having sec secure borders all that. stuff. So why did they change their. tune? The reason is that they discovered. that those people vote for them. That's why they want the open borders. >> because if you let people in, they know. the Democrats let them in. They'll vote.

for Democrats. Yes. If you allow them to. vote, >> which which they are actively trying. doing, they they turn a blind eye to. illegal voting. >> Well, California literally doesn't allow. you to show your license. >> California and New York have made it. illegal to show your photo ID when. voting. Thus, effectively they've made uh it. impossible to prove for fraud. Impossible. They they've essentially. legalized fraudulent voting in. California and New York and many other. parts of the country. >> There's no rational explanation that.

I've ever seen anyone give as to why. that would be the policy. unless you were trying to just allow. people to vote illegally because there's. no other reason. If you need a driver's. license or you need an ID for everything. else, including just recently to prove. that you were vaccinated, >> the the same people who are demanding. that you have that you have a vaccine. passport and and are are the same ones. saying you need no ID to vote. Same people, >> right? But like.

>> so it's obviously hypocritical and. inconsistent. >> So you really think it's just to to get. more voters? If if you want to understand behavior, you have to look at the incentives. Um so uh once uh you know the Democratic. Party in the US and the left in in in in. Europe realized that um if you have open. borders um and you provide a ton of. government handouts which creates a. massive financial incentive uh for.

people from other countries to to come. to to your country and you don't. prosecute them for crime, they're going. to be beholden to you and they will vote. for you. And that's why. uh Obama and Hillary went from being um. against open borders to being in favor. of open borders. That's the reason in. order to import voters so they can win. elections. Um.

and the problem is that that has a a. negative runaway effect. So if they get. away with that like it it is it is a. winning strategy. If they are allowed to. get away with it, they will import as. the enough voters to get supermajority. voting and then there is no turning. back. >> We talked about this before the election. and then you know you literally pointed. towards a camera. You faced the camera. and said that if you do not vote now, you might not ever be able to do it. again because it it'll be it'll be. futile. It'll be overrun.

>> Yes. They'll keep the borders open for. another four years and then their. objective will be achieved. >> Correct? If if if Trump had lost um. there would never have been another real. election again. Um because Trump is. actually enforcing the border. Um now. you you can can you can point to. situations where uh there's been uh you. know um you know immigration had you. know enforcement has been overzealous. because they're not going to be perfect.

There'll be cases where they've been. overzealous um in in expelling illegals. Um so um but if you say that the the the. standard must be perfection uh for. expelling legals then you will not get. any expulsion um because perfection is. impossible. Um so. >> and you've probably got millions of. people that are here that are trying to. be here under some asylum pretense, >> right?

>> Yes. >> Like you could just come from a war torn. part of the world. No, they changed the. definition of asylum to be an economic. to be economic asylum. >> which is everybody. >> which is everybody. >> Yeah. >> So. bar to prove. >> it's yeah asylum is supposed to mean. that if you go back to your country. you'll get killed. >> you know that that's what we mean by. that was what it's supposed to mean. Uh. they changed the definition of asylum to. be uh you will have a decreased standard. of living. which is obviously not real asylum. Um,

and and it's and and you can you can. test the absurdity of this by the fact. that people who are asylum seekers go on. vacation to the country that they're. seeking asylum from. [laughter]. >> You know, that doesn't make any sense. >> Yeah. It doesn't have to. >> But when you when you understand the. incentives, then then you understand the. behavior. Um, so once the left realize. that uh that illegals will will vote for.

them if they allow if they have open. borders and and combine that with uh. with government handouts. >> Yeah. to create a massive incentive. They're basically uh using US and and. Europe, US and European taxpayer dollars. to provide a financial incentive to. bring in as many illegals as possible to. vote them into a into permanent power. into and create a one party state. And and I I invite anyone who's is.

listening to this ju just do do any. research and the more you the more you. dig into it, the more it will become. obvious that what I'm saying is. absolutely true. Well, they were busting. people to swing states. It's it's clear. that they were trying to do something. And then you had Chuck Schumer and Nancy. Pelosi who are actively talking about. the need to bring in people to make them. citizens because we're in population. collapse. >> Yes. >> Yeah. >> No, that's it's it's that it's that. meme. Yeah. >> Where [laughter]. so many times where they start off by.

saying it's it's not true. It's a. right-wing conspiracy theorist, >> right? >> Um then it starts then it's like uh I. think the ne the next step is um well it. it might be true and then it's like okay. it is true but here's why. >> And then the final step is it's true and. here's why it's good. And it's like but. wait a second you started off saying. it's untrue and it's a right-wing. conspiracy theorist. Now you're saying. it Not only is it true, but it's a good. thing and we must do more of it.

>> Well, this is the thing about [laughter]. Medicaid and Social Security and people. getting social security numbers. >> You know that we're massive fraud. It's. massive fraud and it's real and they. denied it forever. And now we're finding. out this is part of the reason why. there's this government shutdown that's. going on right now. >> Yes. the the entire basis for the. government shutdown is that um is that. the Trump administration correctly does. not want to send massive amounts of like. hundreds of billions of dollars uh to.

fund uh illegal immigrants in the blue. states or in all the states really. Um, and so the and the Democrats want to. keep the the the money spiggot going to. incent uh illegal immigrants to come. into the US who will vote for them. That's the crux of the battle. So they want to stop this. So what's. going on right now is they have been. funding these people. They've been. giving them EBT cards. They've been.

giving them Medicaid. And more than that, just like like they. were the um like like they were taking. hotels like four and fivestar hotels. like the Roosevelt Hotel being the. classic example um was they were sending. I think $60 million a year to the. Roosevelt Hotel to uh which all it did. was was house illegals. It used to be a. nice hotel. I mean it still is a nice. hotel. Um uh but uh. and and all around the country this was.

happening. >> and all tax dollars. >> Yes. >> Yeah. And. >> um Yeah. And uh the Trump administration. cut off funding for example to to the uh. uh to the you know Roosevelt Hotel and. these other hotels saying like we it. it's US tax dollars should not be paid. be sent to have luxury hotels for. illegal immigrants that American. citizens can't even afford which. obviously is the that's that's insane.

That's what was happening. They were. also g giving out like debit cards with. $10,000. So, it's not just about medical care. Um, the the the Democrats mention the. medical care because they're they're. trying to prey on people's empathy as. much as possible and then they imagine, oh wow, somebody has a desperately. needed medical procedure and um. shouldn't we maybe do, you know, take. care of them in that regard, but but. they what they do is they divert the. Medicaid funds uh uh and turn it into a. slush fund for the for the states that.

goes well beyond uh emergency medical. care. and. >> New York and California would be. bankrupt without uh without the massive. fraudulent federal payments that go to. those states to pay for illegals to to. to create a massive financial incentive. for for illegals. >> How would they be bankrupt because of. that? >> Uh they wouldn't be able to balance. their state budgets and they can't issue. currency like the Federal Reserve can. >> and so the their ability to balance. budget is dependent upon illegals.

getting funding. the the the scam level here is is. so staggering. Um. so there are there are hundreds of. billions of dollars in of of transfer. payments from from the federal. government to the states. Um those. transfer payments uh the the states. self-report what those transfer payment. numbers should be. So, California and. New York and Illinois lie like crazy uh.

and say and and say that this these are. all legitimate payments. Well, these. days they I think they they're even. admitting that they they literally want. uh hundreds of billions of dollars for. illegals. Um but uh but for a while. there they're trying to deny it. Um so. you get these transfer payments for for. every every government program you can. possibly think of. Um and and and these. are self-reported by the state and there. and and at least historically there was. no enforcement of uh of California um.

New York, Illinois and and and other. states when when they would lie. There. was no actual enforcement to say like, "Hey, you you're lying. These these. these payments are fraudulent." Now, under the Trump administration, um that. Trump administration does not want to. send hundreds of billions of dollars of. fraud fraudulent payments to the states. the um and the reason you have this the. standoff is because if the hundreds. hundreds of billions of dollars uh to.

create a financial incentive to like to. have this giant magnet to attract. illegals from every part of earth to uh. to these states if if that is turned off. they the the illegals will leave because. they're no longer being paid to come to. the United States and stay here. Wow. And then then then they will lose a lot. of voters. The the the Democratic party. will lose a lot of voters. >> and they would have a very difficult job. if this is kicked out of reintroducing. it into a new bill.

>> Yes. >> Especially once things start. normalizing. >> Yes. So like in a nutshell um the. Democratic party wants to destroy. democracy by importing voters and the. you know the Republican party disagrees. with that. >> And the ruse is that if you don't accept. what they're doing then you're a threat. to democracy. >> Yes. >> As they try to destroy democracy. >> Yes. >> By importing voters. >> and incentivizing people to only vote.

for them. >> and overwhelming the system. Yes. And and by the way, it's a strategy. that if allowed to work would work and. in fact has worked. Um California. supermajority Democrat. >> Yeah. >> Um and and there's so much. gerrymandering that that that occurs. It's it's it's crazy. Um so. >> I'm sure you're paying attention to this. Proposition 50 thing. >> That's the thing in California where. they're trying to re redo districts.

>> Yeah. >> Because I mean California is already. gerrymandered like crazy. Yeah. >> Um they want to gerrymander it even. more. >> Um and and I mean. >> because it keeps moving further and. further right. Like if you look at the. map of California each voting cycle more. and more people are waking up and going. what the [ __ ] and we need to do. something to fix this. The only option. available other than the policies that. you guys have always done is go right. >> And so a lot of people have been air air. quotes red. >> pill. >> Yeah. >> And and and then here's another thing.

that is very important. um fact that. that is actually not disputed by by. either side which is that when when we. do the census in the United States, the. census, the way the census works uh for. aortionment of congressional seats and. um electoral electoral college votes for. the president is by number of persons in. a state, not number of citizens, right? >> It's number of pe people. So you could. literally be a tourist and you will. count. >> Now how do they do the census when they. do that? Do they is it do they ask.

people? Do they knock on doors? Do they. have them fill out forms? Like what? >> Yeah, I think they they mail out census. forms and knock on doors. Um but the way. the law reads right now um and and uh is. that all if if you are a human with a. pulse. um uh then you count in the census for. allocating congressional seats and. presidential votes, >> right? So, uh, you so.

>> electoral college, >> it doesn't matter whether you're here. legally, illegally, and if if you're a. human with a pulse, um, you count for. congressional aortionment. So that means. that uh the more people the more. illegals that California and New York. can can import when by the time the. census happens in 2030 um the more. congressional seats they will have um. and the more electoral the more. presidential electoral college votes.

they will have um so they're trying to. get as many uh illegals in as possible. ahead of the census. Um and because all. h all all human beings even tourists. count for the census and and then if you. combine that with gerrymandering of of. districts in New York and California as. you point out with this proposition. where they're trying to increase the. amount of gerrymandering that occurs in. California, the biggest state in the. country. Um so so you get so so if the.

this if this the census then would award. more congressional seats to California. uh because of a vast number of illegals. and New York and Illinois. Um so they. get more congressional seats. They would. get more presidential electoral college. votes getting that would get them the. house the uh a majority in the house and. and and they would get to decide who is. president. uh based literally based on legals. This. is these are not disputed facts by.

either party. I want to emphasize that that's sink in. >> Yeah, this is not a. >> These are not disputed facts by either. party. It's not a. this these are just this is just the the. way the law works. It it's it is a. you know like I don't think the law. should work that way. Uh I think it. should the aortionment should be. proportionate to to to citizens. >> But isn't that a problem with how the. constitution is written? >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. >> Um, >> they can't really change that.

>> I I'm not sure if it's constitutional or. u but it it it is the way the law is. written. I'm not sure if it's in the. constitution or not in this way, but um. but it is that is the way the law is. written. >> So, it is an incentive and but it's an. incentive that would be removed with. something simple that makes sense to. everybody that only the people that. should count are people that are. official US citizens. >> Yes. So, the way the way it should work. is that only US citizens should count in. the census for purposes of of. determining voting power.

>> because people that aren't legal can't. vote supposedly. >> They're not supposed to be voting. Um. but but they do. Um uh but but even even. if even besides that, like said, I I I. just can't emphasize this enough because. this is a very important concept for. people to understand. um is that the law. um the the law as it stands um counts. all humans with a pulse in in in in a. state for deciding how many u house of. representative votes and how many.

presidential electoral college votes uh. a a state gets. So the incentive. therefore is uh to uh for California, New York and Illinois to maximize the. number of illegals so they get so they. get um so that they take house seats. away from red states assign them to. California, New York, Illinois and so. forth. Um then then you combine that. with extreme gerrymandering in in you. know California, New York, Illinois and. and whatnot. So that that basically you. you can't even elect any Republicans and.

then they get control of the presidency, control of the house, then they keep. doing that strategy um and and cement a. supermajority. That is what they're trying to do. >> So that would essentially turn the. entire country into California. >> Yes. >> Where you have differing opinions, but. it doesn't matter because one party is. always in control. >> Yes. Um, >> when you first started digging into. this, when you first started before you. even accepted this role of running Doge.

and being a part of all that, did you. have any idea that it was this [ __ ]. up? >> Um, I I did. Yeah. I I mean, I sort of. >> When did you start knowing? >> Um, I guess about like Well, about two. years ago. >> Isn't that crazy? >> Yeah. like relatively recently, you. know. So. >> maybe I started I started having an well. I I started like basically having a bad. feeling about 3 years ago, which is why. which was which is when. >> uh why I felt it was like critical to. acquire Twitter um and have a maximally.

truth seeeking platform, not one that. suppresses the truth. Um and um. like it it was more it was more like I. like I'm not sure what's going on, but I. have a I have a bad feeling about what's. going on. And then the more I dug into. it, the more I was like, "Holy [ __ ] we. got a real problem here and America's. going to fall.". So, uh, >> without anyone knowing it had fallen, that's that would be the problem. It. could have fallen and been unrepable. without anyone really being aware of. what had happened, especially if you.

didn't buy Twitter. >> Yes, that's that's it. Look, buying. Twitter was a a huge pain in the ass. Um, and made me a a a a pin cushion of. attacks. Like dab dab stab dab dab. >> Everybody loved you before that. >> Well, some people love. >> a lot of people loved you. A lot of. lefties loved you. >> Uh, I I was a hero of the left. As far. as. >> the thing, if you drove a Tesla, it. showed that you were environmentally. conscious and you were on the right. side. >> Uh, yeah. Um,

yeah. I mean, I'm still the same human. I didn't like have a brain transplant. between, you know, since in like three. years ago, you know. Um. >> Well, that's my favorite bumper sticker. that people put on Teslas now. I bought. this before Elon went crazy. >> I took a picture of one the other day. Oh, you found somebody. Oh, yeah. I've. seen I've seen three or four of them. People that have these bumper stickers. on their car that says, "I bought this. before Elon went crazy." Because when. people were vandalizing Teslas. >> Yeah. Um the most there was organized.

campaign to literally burn down Teslas. and and we had one of our dealers got. shot up with a gun like they fired. bullets into the in the Tesla. dealership. They're burning down cars. Uh. it was crazy. Um. uh so but the bumper sticker should read. there should be an an addendum to the. bumper sticker. It's like I bought this. car before. uh Elon turned crazy. Actually, now I. realize he's not crazy and I've seen the. light. [laughter].

>> That'll take some time. That'll take. some time. People don't want to admit. that they've been tricked. >> Yeah. I mean, there's that old saying. where it's like it's really easy to fool. somebody, but it's almost impossible to. convince someone that they were fooled. >> Yeah. It's much easier to fool them than. to convince them they've been fooled. People cling to their ideas. >> Yes. They especially if they've like. publicly stated these things, they get. very embarrassed of being foolish. >> Yeah. People most time they double down.

>> Um and uh. >> and they find echo chambers. >> Yeah. Yeah. But but there's you know the. thing is that like I you know I've seen. more and more people who were convinced. of the sort of work ideology um see the. light. >> Yeah. So, not everyone, but it's more. and more um are seeing the light. Um and. and it tends to happen like when when. something happens that really, you know, directly affects you, >> right? >> Um you like there was a friend of mine. who uh was living in in the San.

Francisco Bay area and um that tried to. trans his his his daughter um did like. to the point where the the school like. sent sent the police to his house to. take his daughter away from him. Now, now that's going to radicalize you. Well, that's going to break that's going. to shake you out of your blue structure. Um, now I know, >> so it was an activist at the school that. was trying to do this. >> Yeah, the school and the and the state.

of California conspired to turn his. daughter against him and uh make her. take uh lifealtering drugs that would. have sterilized her um and uh. irreversible. >> And how old was she? I think 14, something like that. Um, so and but he. he managed to talk the police out of. taking his daughter away from him that. day. Um, and that that night he got on a. plane to Texas. >> Wow. Um and uh like you know a year.

after just being in in a in a school in. like greater Austin area um she she went. she came went back to normal meaning. like it it wasn't real. >> right. >> um well people are being much more open. to that now. I mean Wall Street Journal. uh yesterday had that opinion piece that. this whole trans thing there's a lot of. evidence is a social contagion. Absolutely.

>> And Colin Wright wrote that. And then. he's getting death threats now, of. course. And on Blue Sky, there's people. talking about exterminating him, which. is one thing that you are allowed to say. on Blue Sky, apparently. >> You're you're allowed to say horrible. things about people saying possibly. truthful things about this whole social. contagion. Cuz that's what when you get. nine kids that are in a friend group and. they all decide to turn trans together. Yeah. >> Something's wrong. That's not. statistically. >> Yeah. Like here's the like you can.

convince kids to do anything. You can. convince kids to be a suicide bomber, >> right? >> So. >> which is why they do with in in some. countries why they choose children to do. that. >> Yes. You can train kids to be suicide. bombers. And if you can train kids to be. su suicide bombers, you can convince. them of anything. >> Yeah. Especially with enough positive. enforcement and cultural enforcement and. you. >> and and the idea that that that's not. the case. >> Kids kids are kids are um malleable. The. minds of youth are easily corrupted. >> You're also seeing a lot of push back. from gay and lesbian people that are.

saying like, "Hey, if someone. >> stop including me in Yeah. Exactly. the. LGBT, you know, it's like, wait a. second, why are we being included all. the time in this situation?". >> Exactly. Exactly. When especially when, you know, like my friend Tim Dylan's. talked about this is like it's really. homophobic because you're taking these. gay kids and you're you're telling them. like, "Hey, you're not gay. You're. actually a girl.". >> Yes. and you know, hey, hey, go make it. so that you can never have an orgasm. again and you'll be happy. >> Like,

>> yeah, >> [ __ ] permanent mutilation, permanent. castration of of kids is like I I think. >> I I we should look look at at uh anyone. who permanently castrates a kid as like. right up there with Ysef Mangler. >> Yeah. >> I mean, they're they're mutilating. children. >> Yeah. Yeah. And um it's thought of as. being kind. And the thing is, would you. rather have a live daughter or a dead. son? >> That's that's the that's the line they. use. >> Yeah. Which is not supported by any.

data. >> No. In fact, the the probability of. suicide increases. >> Right. >> This is important maybe for the audience. to know. Uh the probability of suicide. increases if you're transit kid, not. decreases. >> By some accounts, it triples. So that. that is an evil lie. And it's a lie that. is supposedly compassionate. Imagine. you've twisted reality to the point. where. confusing a child that's not even. legally allowed to get a [ __ ] tattoo.

>> Yeah. >> Right. Because you think that you could. make a mistake with a tattoo, a totally. removable thing, >> right? >> If I wanted to, tomorrow I can go to a. doctor and they could laser off every. tattoo that I have on me. >> Right. >> Okay. No harm, no foul. Yeah. But you. get sterilized like that's it forever. Forever. Yes, >> they'll castrate you. You no longer have. testicles. You have no penis. You have a. hole where your penis used to be. >> Yes. >> And this is compassionate and this is. preventing you from. >> Actually, a lot of kids die uh in in.

with the these uh sex change operations. They die the number of deaths on the. operating table. People don't hear about. those. A lot of kids because that we. it's we don't really actually have the. technology to make this work. So a bunch. of the times the kids just die in the. sex change operations. >> Jesus Christ. >> Yeah. It's it's demented which it should. be viewed as like you know um like like. evil Nazi doctor stuff basically. That's. why it was like real Nazi not the.

[ __ ] fake Nazi stuff. >> Crazy that even pushing back against. something that seems like fundamentally. logically. very easy to argue the old Twitter would. ban you forever. Uh, yes. >> That's how crazy a social contagion can. get when it completely defies logic, victimizes children, does something that. makes no sense, does not supported by. data, all connected to this ideology. that trans is good. We got to save trans.

kids, protect trans kids. >> Yeah. And what I want to emphasize is. that the the save trans kids thing is a. lie. Um if if you if you if you castrate. kids and trans them the probability of. suicide increases. It does not decrease. It substantially increases. Um the the. the studies have done that I've seen the. the risk of suicide. triples if you trans kids. So you're not saving them, you're. killing them. Moreover, during the sex.

change operation, there are many deaths. that occur during the sex change. operation. >> Jesus Christ. It's just crazy that this is a real. issue. >> Yeah, it it's a nightmare fever dream. and and people are finally waking up. from it. Now, when you started getting into the. Doge stuff and started finding how much. money is being shuffled around and moved. around to NOS's and how much money is.

involved and. just totally untraceable funds like. this is again something like two years. plus ago you weren't aware of it all. >> No, I was aware of it. Um I just didn't. realize how how the how big it was. just. just just how much waste and forward. there is in the government is truly. vast. Um in fact the government didn't even. know um and nor did they care.

>> That's crazy. >> Yeah. >> And. >> I mean just like some of the very basic. stuff that Doge did um will have lasting. effects. Um and some of these things. like they're so elementary you can't. believe it. So, um the the doge team got. the um you know the the mo most of the. main payments computers um to require. uh the the congressional appropriation.

code. So, when a payment is made, you. have to actually enter the congressional. appropriation card. That used to be. optional and and often would be just. left blank. So, the money would just go. out, but it wasn't even tied to a. congressional appropriation. Then they. also Dutch team also made the uh comment. field for the payment mandatory. So you. have to say something. We're not saying. that what what is said like you can say. anything. You you your cat could run. across the keyboard. Uh you could go. querty ASDF but you have to say. something above nothing because what we.

found was that there were tens of. billions maybe hundreds of billions of. dollars that were zombie payments. So. there like somebody had approved a. payment uh uh somebody in the government. approved a payment um and uh some. recurring payment and um they retired or. died or changed jobs and no one turned. the money off. So the money would just keep going out. and and it's a pretty rare. >> go where. >> to to the a company or an individual um.

and it's a pretty rare company or. individual who will complain that. they're getting money that they should. not get and and a bunch of the money was. just going to the were transfer payments. to the states. >> So these are automatic payments there no. accounting for them at all. >> I imagine like like there's an automatic. debit of your credit card. >> um and you don't you never look at the. statement, >> right? Um, so it's just money going out. Uh, that's why I call them zombie. payments. Um, that there might have been.

they might have been legitimate at one. point, but the person who approved that. recurring payment um, changed jobs, died, retired, or whatever, and no one. ever turned the money off. And my guess is that's probably at least. a hundred billion a year, maybe 200. and. going where. >> uh to to uh. uh I mean there there are millions of. these payments. So so it's I mean.

>> millions. >> uh yes. >> millions of payments that are going to. who knows where. >> Yes. In a bunch of cases there are fraud. rings that operate uh professional fraud. rings that operate to exploit the. system. um they figure out some security. hole in the system and they just do. professional fraud. Um and um you know. that's where we found for example people. who were you know 300 years old in the.

social security administration database. Now, I thought that this was uh a. mistake of not registering their deaths. that people were born like a long time. ago and it had defaulted to like a. certain number and so that after time. those people were still in the system. It was just an error of the the way the. accounting was done. >> Yeah. So, um that's not true. So, there's or or at least one of two things.

must be true. um the there's a there's a. typo or or some mistake in the computer. or it's fraudulent, but we don't have. any 300-year-old vampires uh living in. America. >> Allegedly. >> Allegedly. Um and uh or or and we don't. have people in some cases who's who are. receiving payments who are born in the. future. [laughter]. >> Born in the future. >> Born in the future. >> Really? >> Yes. there the people receiving payments. whose birth date uh um was like in 2100.

and something. >> okay so there's. >> like next century. >> is there a task. >> we know we know that one of two things. must be true um that that that either. there's a mistake in the computer or. it's fraud. but if you have someone's birth date. that's either in the future or where. they are older than the oldest living. American because the oldest living. American is 114 years old so if they're. more than 114 years. um there is either a mistake and someone. should should call them and say I I.

think we have your birthday uh wrong. because it says you were born in 17 you. know 8086. um and um you know that was before you. know um you know before there was really. an America you know it was it was like. uh you know kind of early you know we're. still fighting England type of thing uh. [laughter]. you. It's like uh this person either needs to. be in the Guinness Book of World Records.

or or they're not alive, >> but still at the end of the day, money. is going towards that account that's. connected to this person that is either. non-existent or. >> so like like Yeah. So there was like uh. I think um something like I don't know. 20 million uh people in the Social. Security Administration database that. could not possibly be alive um if their. birth date is like based on their birth. date they could not possibly be alive. >> And then to be clear 20 million people.

that were receiving funds. >> uh a bunch of. most of them were not receiving funds. Some of them were receiving funds. Most. were not receiving funds. But so let me. tell you how the scam works. It's it's a. bank shot. So the Social Security. Administration database is used as the. source of truth by all the other. databases that the government uses. So. even if they stop the payments on the. Social Security Administration database. like unemployment insurance, Small. Business Administration, student loans. all check the Social Security.

Administration database to say is this. is this a legitimate alived person? And. uh and if the social security database. will say yes, this person is still alive. even though they're 200 years old. Um. but forgets to mention that they're 200. years old, it just says it just returns. uh uh when when the computer is queries, it says yes, this person is alive. And. so then they're able to exploit the. entire rest of the government ecosystem. So fake then you get fake student loans,

then you get fake unemployment. insurance, then you get fake medical. payments. And this doesn't have to be. tied to an individual where where. there's an address where you can check. on this person. >> No, if you did do if just did any check. at all, you would stop this. >> So, so, so that's that that that's so so. >> And how much money do you think is. >> any check like anything at all that. would stop would stop the forward like. any effort at all? >> Um, yeah. >> So, there's multiple layers. the social.

security number verifies that this is a. real person and then the other systems. check every other government payment and. every other government payment system. for everything for like small small. business administration uh student loans. uh Medicaid Medicare uh every other. government payment of which there are. many there there actually hundreds of. government payment systems uh can all be. exploited so long as social security. database says this person is alive. that's the nature of the scam It's a.

bank shot. So then the then the rebuttal. from the Dems is like, oh well the vast. majority of the people who are marked as. alive in the Social Security. Administration weren't receiving Social. Security Administration payments. That. is true. What they forgot to mention is. they're getting fraudulent payments from. every other government program. And that's why the the DMs were so. opposed to turning off to to declaring. someone dead who was dead because it. would stop the entire other all the. other fraud from happening. And so, but. all this is it trackable like all this.

other fraud. >> If they wanted to, they could chase it. all down. >> Yeah. It's not even hard. >> And yet they're opposing chasing it all. down. >> They're opposing chasing it all down. because it would it turns off the money. magnet for the illegals. Wow. Because it's very logical to to like. like I'm saying the most common sense. things possible. If someone's got uh a. birthday in social security that is an. impossible birthday, meaning they are.

older than the oldest living American or. were born in the future, then you should. call them and say, "Excuse me, we seem. to have your birthday wrong.". Uh because it says that you're 200 years. old. That's all you need to do. Um, and. >> and then you would remove them from the. social security database and make that. number no longer available for all those. other government payments. >> Exactly. >> Wow. And how much money are we talking?

>> It's hund hundreds of billions of. dollars. >> And this is all traceable. Like you. could hunt all. >> like you don't need to be Sherlock. Holmes here is what I'm saying. >> Well, this we don't need to call. Sherlock Holmes for this one. Is this. part of. >> you just need to call the person. >> and and say, "Excuse me, we either we we. seem to have the [laughter] like we we. we must have your birthday wrong because. it says you're 200 years old or were. born uh in the future. Um so could you. tell us what your birthday is?

That's all you need to do. It's it's. that simple." But the all these other. government payments that are available. that are connected to this social. security number, it seems like if you. just chased that all down, Yeah. >> you would find the widespread fraud. You. would find where it's going. >> Yes. The but the root of the problem is. the social security administration. database because um the social security. number in the United States is used as a. deacto national ID number.

You know that's why like the bank always. asks for your social like the you know. any financial institution will ask for. your social security number. >> This is it sounds so insane that this. isn't chased down. I mean. >> I agree. >> that I mean I mean that in and of itself. is that's such mishandling. >> Yes. No it's mind-blowing. Um, so yeah, it's.

crazy. >> Well, you were very reluctant last time. you were here to talk about the extent. of some of the fraud because you're. like, they could kill me because this is. kind of. >> Oh, what? Yeah. What I was saying is. that um the like if you create if like. uh. I like like to be pragmatic and. realistic um you actually can't manage. to zero fraud. you can manage to low.

fraud number but not to zero fraud. If. you manage to zero fraud, um you you. you're going to push so many people over. the edge who are receiving fraudulent. payments that the number of inbound. homicidal maniacs will be uh really hard. to overcome. So I I'm I'm actually. taking I think quite a reasonable. position which is that we should simply. reduce the amount of fraud which I think. is not an extremist position. Um, and we. should aspire to, you know, have less. fraud over time. Um, not that we should.

be ultra draconian and eliminate every. last scrap of fraud. Um, which I guess would be nice to have, but. but like we don't even need to go that. extreme. I'm I'm saying we should just. stop the blatant large scale super. obvious fraud. >> I think that's a reasonable position. >> It's a very reasonable position. Yeah. And so what was the most shocking push. back that you got when you started. implementing Doge? When you started. investigating into where money was.

going? Well, um I guess it this was I should. have anticipated this, but um. while most of the fraudulent government. payments to especially to the NOS's go. to the Democrats, most of it like I. don't know for argument sake let's say. 80% maybe 90%. Um um 10 to 20% of it. does go to Republicans. And so when we'd turn off funding to a.

fraudulent NGO, we'd get complaints from. whatever the 10% of Republicans who were. receiving uh the money and and they. would, you know, they would very loudly. complain. Um. because the the honest answer is the. Republicans are are partly they're. receiving some of the fraud, too. They're getting a big. >> Jesus. Yeah, it's I want to be clear. It's it's.

not like the Republican party is some um. ultra pure paragon of virtue here. >> No. >> Okay. Um. >> well, you see that with the. congressional insider training. It's. across the board. >> Yeah. >> It's left and right. >> I mean, the whole uni party criticism. has some validity to it. you know, there's so um and it's it's like if you. turn off fraudulent payments, it's not. like like I say, it's not like 100% of. those payments were going to Democrats. A a small percentage were also going to.

Republicans. Those Republicans. complained very loudly. Um and um. you know and and that's that's. so there was a lot of push back on the. Republican side for when we started. cutting some of these these funds. and I tried telling them like well you. know 90% of the money is going to your. opponents but they still if they even if. they're getting 10% of. >> they want their peace. >> Yeah. They want their peace. >> and they've been getting that peace for.

a long time. >> Yes. Did you see. >> this is why like you know politics is. like. >> it's dirty business. >> Yeah. I mean that's like saying if like. you know if if you if you like sausages. and respect the law do not watch either. of them being being made [laughter]. >> yeah. Wow. Well that's not even true because I've. made sausage before. >> Yeah. Yeah. It's actually like it's not. that big a deal. Yeah. fat and spices.

and casing, >> run it through the machine. Not that big. a deal. >> Yeah. Um but uh yeah, I mean I I think. the stuff I'm saying here is not uh like. like if if you stand back and think. about it for a second like oh yeah that. that makes sense, you know. >> Um the it's it's not like um it's not. like one political party is going to be. um. you know pure devil or pure angel. There's, you know, I think there's.

there's there there's there's much more. corruption on the Democrat side, but. it's not there's not there's still some. corruption on the Republican side. >> How did it happen that the majority of. the corruption wound up being on the. Democrat side? >> Well, because the the the transfer. payments, especially to illegals, um, uh, are very much on the Democrat side. >> That so that's the root of it all is the. illegal situation. >> Yes. I mean, there's. >> or a focal point. >> Yes. It's it's also like it's it's um. it's it would also be accurate to say.

that while. obviously not everyone who is a Democrat. is a criminal, almost everyone who is a. criminal is a Democrat [laughter]. because because the Democrats are the. soft crime party. So if you're a. criminal, who you going to vote for? >> Right. Right. >> The soft crime party. Did you think you. were going to be able to get more done. than you were? >> Um, we did get a lot done,

>> right? >> Um, and Doge is still still still. happening, by the way. Um, this the the. Doge is still underway. There are still. there are still um there's still waste. and fraud being being cut by by the Doge. team. So, it hasn't stopped. Um, the. >> it's less publicized. >> It's less publicized. Um, and they don't. have like a clear person to attack. anymore. >> Well, it seems like they basically they. they applied immense pressure to me to. just to stop it. So then I'm like the.

best thing for me is to just, you know, cut out of this. In any case, as a. special government employee, I could. only be there for like 120 days anyway, something like that. So whatever the law. says. So I I could I I I was necessarily. could only be there for 4 months uh as a. special government employee. So, um. um but uh yeah, I mean I mean you turn. off the money spigot to to fraudsters, they get very upset to say the least. Um. and um but my like my death threat level.

went uh ballistic, you know, was like a. like a rocket going to orbit. Um. yeah. Um, so but now that now now now. that I'm not in DC that that that I. guess they don't really have a person to. attack uh anymore. >> Um, >> well the rhetoric about you has calmed. down significantly. >> Yeah, >> it was disturbing. It was disturbing to. watch. It was like this is crazy. >> And to watch these politicians engage in. it and all these people just like. framing you as this monster. I was like.

this is so weird. Like this is what. happens when you uncover fraud. >> Yes. >> The whole machine turns on you. And if. it wasn't for a person like you who owns. a platform and has an enormous amount of. money, like could have destroyed you. >> Yeah. >> And that was the goal. >> The goal was to destroy me. Absolutely. >> Because you were getting in the way. >> of this amazing graft. >> The the this gigantic fraud machine. >> Yeah. >> Um like I think I think Doge team's on. done a lot of good work. Um, you know,

and in in terms of uh fraud and waste. prevented, my guess is it's, you know, probably on the order of two or 300. billion a year. So, it's pretty good. >> What do you think could have been done. if you just had like full reign and. total cooperation? How much do you think. you could have saved? >> I mean, what level of of power are we. assuming here? >> Godlike. >> Oh, yeah. I probably cut the federal. budget in half. and get more done.

That is so crazy. It is so crazy that. get more done and federal budget. widespread. It's that widespread. >> Well, I mean a whole bunch of government. departments simply shouldn't exist in my. opinion. um they they um you know um. >> like examples. >> well the department of ed department of. education which was created uh recently. like under Jimmy Carter um uh the our. educational results have uh gone uh. downhill ever since it was created. So.

if you if you create a department and. the result of creating that department. is a massive decline in educational. results and it's department of. education, you're better off not having. it because we're literally we were did. better before there was one than after. >> when you let the states run it. >> Yes. >> Yeah. >> Because at least the states can compete. with one another. Um so but the problem. is like here like cutting department. education. our kids need education. Yeah, they do. But but this is a new. department that didn't even exist um you.

know until late the late 70s. Um and. ever since that department was created, the results educational results have. declined. And so why would you have an institution. continue that has made education worse? It doesn't make sense. >> They killed it though, right? No, there. still unfortunately. >> but they were trying to kill it. >> It has been substantially reduced. >> Okay. >> Um. >> what other organizations.

what other departments? >> Well, I mean I'm a small government guy. So um you know when when the you know. when the country was created we just we. we just had the department of state, department of war um you know and and uh. sort of the sort of the department of. justice. We had an attorney general uh. and Treasury Department. Um. I don't know why you need more than. that.

>> So what other departments specifically. do you think are just completely. ineffective? >> Well, I mean here it's like a question. It's a sort of philosophical question of. how much government do you think there. should be? >> Right. >> Um in my opinion, there should be uh the. least amount of government. I've heard. the most bizarre argument against this. is that you're cutting jobs and you're. gonna leave people jobless. And I'm. like, but their jobs are useless. >> Yeah. Paying people to do nothing. doesn't make sense. Um like there's a.

like a a great um. a story about like Milton Friedman who. is awesome. Um uh what like generally. whatever Milton Friedman said is you. know people should should do that thing. Uh I'm not sure if it's apocryphal or. not, but um like like someone complained. to him like he he he observed I think. people that were like um digging ditches. with uh you know with with um shovels. and um and he said well like allegedly.

Freeman said, "Well, I think I think you. should use you know um excavating. equipment instead of shovels and you. could get it done with far fewer. people." And then and then someone said, "But then we're going to lose a lot of. jobs." Well, in that then Freedom says, "Well, in that case, why don't you have. them use teaspoons?" [laughter]. Just just dig ditches with teaspoons. Think of all the jobs you'll create. >> I mean, [laughter].

it's [ __ ] Basically, you just want. people to work on on things that are. that are productive. You want people to. work on on building things um on. building you know uh providing products. and services that people find valuable. um like you know making food um being. you know being a farmer or a plumber or. electrician or just anyone who's a. builder or providing useful services. Um. and um that's what you want people to be. doing. um not fake government jobs uh.

that that that don't add any value or. may subtract value. Um. um there's also like you know uh to. illustrate the absurdity of also how is. the e how is the economy measured like. the the way economists measure the. economy is is is nonsensical uh because. they'll measure any job no matter even. if that job is a dumb job that has no. point and is even counterproductive. So. like, so the like the joke is like. there's two economists going on a hike.

in the woods. and [laughter]. they come across. a pile of [ __ ] and one economist says to. the other, "I'll pay you $100 to eat eat. that [laughter] shit.". The economist eats the [ __ ] gets the. $100. They they keep walking. Then the. other econ then come across another pile. of [ __ ] And and the the other economist. says, "Now I'll pay you $100 to eat the. pile of shit.". >> [laughter]. >> say pays the so pays the other economist. $100 pile of [ __ ] Then they then then.

then the way said they said like wait a. second um we both just ate a pile of. [ __ ] and we're no and and and and we're. we're no we we we we. don't have any more extra money like. like we both you just gave the $100 back. to me and we both ate a pile of [ __ ]. This doesn't make any sense. And they. said, "No, no, but think of the economy. because that's $200 of that in the. economy that that basically [laughter]. measure eating eating [ __ ] would count.

as a as as a as a job. [laughter]. This is this is this is to illustrate. the absurdity of of of. economics. >> One of the things you said when. [laughter] things should not count as a. job." One of the things you said when. you stepped away is that you're kind of. done and that it's unfixable. That um. well or under its current form the way. people are approaching it.

you can you can make it directionally. better but ultimately you can't uh fully. fix the system. Um, so, uh, I I I like like like like it it. it is it is it would be accurate to say. that even. like like unless you could go like super. draconian like you know Gangghaskhan. level on on on cutting waste waste and. fraud which you can't really do in a. democratic country um an aspirationally.

democratic country then um there's no. way to solve the the the debt crisis. So, we got we got national debt that's. just insane where the debt payments the. interest payments on the debt exceed our. entire military budget. I mean, that's one that was one of the. wakeup calls for me. I was like, "Wait a. second. The interest on a national debt. is bigger than the entire the entire. military budget. um and growing. Um this is crazy. Um so.

um. so so even if you implement all these. savings, you're only delaying the day of. reckoning for when America becomes goes. bankrupt. So unless you go full. Genghaskhan, um which you can't really. do. So. um. so I came to the conclusion that the. only way that the only way to get us out.

of the debt crisis and to prevent. America from going bankrupt is AI and. robotics. So, like we need to grow the economy. um at. at a at a at a rate that allows us to u. to pay off our debt. Um. and um I I I guess people just generally. don't appreciate the degree to which um. you know this the the government. overspending is is a problem. Um but.

even like the social security website, this is under the Biden administration. On the website, it would say like uh we. based on on current demographic trends. and um you and and and how much money. social security is bringing in versus. how many social security recipients. there are because we have an aging. population. Relatively speaking, the. average age is is increasing. Social. Security will not be able to ma u. maintain its full payments u I think in. by 2032. there. Okay. So they will social.

security will have to stop will start. reducing the the amount of money that. that's been paid people um in in about. seven years. >> And so the only way to fix that robotics. manufacturing. raise GDP. >> you've got to basically uh massively. increase the um uh economic output which. is and the only way to do that is AI AI. and robotics. So, so basically we're. going bankrupt without AI and robotics. with even with a bunch of savings um.

[snorts] the savings the savings like. reducing uh waste and forward can give. us a longer runway but it cannot. ultimately pay off our national debt. >> So what do you think the solution is to. the jobs that are going to be lost. because of AI and robotics? The jobs due. to automation the jobs due to no longer. do we need human beings to do these jobs. because AI is doing them. Do you think. it's going to be some sort of a. universal basic income thing? Do you. think there's going to be some other. kind of solution that has to be.

implemented. because a lot of people are going to be. out of work, right? Um I think there will be um actually a. high demand for jobs but not necessarily. the same jobs. So. I mean this is actually this process has. been happening um throughout um modern. history. Um I mean there used to be like. like doing calculations um ma manually.

with with like a pencil and paper. It. used to be a job. So they used to have. like buildings full of people called. computers where the the banks would like. all you do all day is is is um you do. calculations because they didn't have. computers. They didn't they didn't have. digital didn't have digital computers. that that people. >> Yeah. Well, it was just people would. just like add and subtract stuff on. piece of paper and and and that that. would be how banks would do you know. financial processing. >> and you'd have to literally go over. their equations to make sure the books.

are balanced. >> Yeah. And most times it's just simple. math like you know the like in a world. before computers how did you calculate. how did you you do transactions? You had. to do them by hand. Um so then when computers were. introduced the job of doing um you know. bank calculations no longer existed. Um. so people had to go do something else. Um and that's what's going to happen. that what's that's what is happening at. an accelerated rate um due to AI and and.

then robotics. That's the issue though, right? The accelerated rate because it's. going to be. >> it's the accelerator. It's it's it's. just happening. Like I said, like AI is. the supersonic tsunami. >> So that's what I call it, supersonic. tsunami. Um so. >> it's like what other jobs will be. available that aren't available now. because of AI? >> Um well AI um will is is really still. digital. Ultimately, um AI can improve.

the productivity of of humans who who um. build things with their hands or do. things with their hands like plum, you. know, literally. welding, electrical work, plumbing, anything. that's that's [snorts] physically moving. atoms. Um like cooking food or um you. know farming or or like like anything. that's that's physical uh those jobs. will exist for a much longer time. But. anything that is digital uh which is.

like just someone at a computer doing. something, AI is going to take over. those jobs like lightning, >> coding, anything along those lines. Yeah, [snorts]. >> it's going to take over those jobs like. lightning. Um just like it just like. digital computers took over the job of. people doing manual calculations. but but much faster. >> So what happens to all those people? Like what kind of numbers are we talking. about? you're going to lose most. drivers, right? Commercial drivers.

You're going to have automated vehicles, AI controlled systems, just like uh. there's certain ports in China, I think. in Singapore, where everything's. completely automated. >> Yeah. Mostly. Yeah. Yeah. >> Yeah. So, you're going to lose a lot of. those jobs. Long shoreman jobs, trucking, commercial drivers. >> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, we actually do have. a shortage of of truck drivers, but. there's there's actually um. >> Well, that's why California has hired so. many illegals to do it. Have you seen. those numbers? >> Yeah. Um I mean, the problem is like.

when you when people don't know how to. drive a semi-truck, which is actually a. hard thing to do, then they they crash. and kill people. >> Yeah. >> Um a friend of mine's wife was killed by. an an illegal driving a truck and she. was just out biking. Um and uh there was. an illegal he didn't know how to drive. the truck or so or something. I mean and. he he ran ran her over. Um so I mean like thing is like for. something like you you can't you can't.

let people drive uh you know. sort of an 80,000lb semi um if if they. don't know how to do it. But in California, they're just letting. people do it. >> because they need people to do it. >> Well, they also need they want the votes. and that kind of thing. But um but but. yeah, like cars are um cars are going to. be autonomous. Um, but there there's. just so many desk desk jobs where where. really people what people are doing is.

they're processing email um or they're. answering the phone. Um, and and just. anything that is that that isn't moving. atoms like anything that is not. physically like doing physical work that. will obviously be the first thing those. jobs will be and are being eliminated by. by AI at a very rapid pace. Um. um. and ultimately. I working will be optional. uh because you'll have robots plus AI.

um and we'll have in a benign scenario. universal high income not just universal. basic income universal high income. meaning anyone can have any products or. services that they want. So you. >> but but there will be a lot of trauma. and disruption along the way. >> So you anticipate a basic income from. that that the economy will boost to such. an extent that a high income would be.

available to almost everybody. So we'd. essentially eliminate poverty. >> um in the benign scenario. Yes. So like. the way. >> there's multiple scenarios. >> There are multiple scenarios. There's a. lot of ways this movie can end. Um, like. the reason I'm so concerned about AI. safety is that like one of the. possibilities is the Terminator. scenario. It's not it's not 0%. Um, so. um, that's why it's like I'm like really. banging the drum on AI needs to be.

maximally truth seeeking. like don't. make I don't force AI to believe a lie. like that the for example the founding. fathers were actually a group of diverse. women or that misgendering is worse than. nuclear war because you if if that's the. case and then you get the robots and the. AI becomes omnipotent it can enforce. that outcome. and then [clears throat] then like. unless you're a diverse woman you're.

you're out of the picture so we're we're. toast So that's. >> [snorts]. >> um or you might wake up as a diverse. woman [laughter] one day. has adjusted the picture and and we are. now. >> everyone's a diverse woman. So that. would be that's the the worst possible. situation. So what would be the steps. that we would have to take in order to. implement the benign solution. where it's universal high income like. best case scenario this is the path.

forward to universal high income for. essentially every single citizen that. the the economy gets boosted by AI and. robotics to such an extent that no one. ever has to work again and what about. meaning for those people which is which. gets really weird. >> Yeah. >> I don't know how to answer the question. about meaning. Um. >> that's an individual problem, right? But. it's going to be an individual problem. for millions of people.

>> Yeah. Well, I I mean I I I guess I've like for. fought against saying like, you know, I. you know, I've been I've been a voice. saying like, "Hey, we need to slow down. AI. we need to slow down all these. things. Um, and and we need to, you. know, not not have a crazy AI race. I've. been saying that for a long time, for 20. 20 plus years. Um, but but then I, you. know, I came to realize that, um, really.

there's two choices here. Either be a. spectator or a or a participant. And if. I'm a, if I'm a spectator, I can't. really influence the direction of AI. But if I'm a participant, I can try to. influence the direction of AI and have a. maximally truth seeeking AI with with. good values that uh loves humanity. And. that's what we're trying to create with. Grock at XAI. And um you know, the. research is I think bearing this out. Like I said, the when they when they. compared like how do AIs value the. weight of a human life? Um.

Grock was the only one the only one of. the AIS that weighted human life. equally. um and and didn't and didn't say like a. white guy's uh worth 120th of a of a of. a a black woman's life. Literally, that's what they they calculation they. came up with. >> So, I'm like, this is I'm like, this is. very alarming. We should we got to watch. this stuff. >> So, this is one of the things that has. to happen in order to reach this benign. solution.

>> Yeah. We we we I I just keep. >> Best movie ending. Yeah. Um, you you. want a a curious truth seeeking AI. Um, and I think a curious truth seeeking AI. will want to foster humanity. Uh, because we're much more interesting than. um a bunch of rocks. Like you say, like. like I I love Mars, you know, but but. Mars is kind of boring. Like it's just a. bunch of red rocks. Um, it does some. cool stuff. It's got a tall mountain.

It's got, you know, it's got the biggest. re the biggest ravine and the tallest. mountain. Um, but there's no there's no. there's no animals or plants or and and. there's no people. Um, and uh, you know, so humanity is just much more. interesting if you're a curious truth. seeeking AI than not humanity. It's just. much more interesting. Um, I mean like. as as humans, we could go for example. and and eliminate all chimps. If we said.

if we put our minds to it, we could say. we could go out and we could annihilate. all chimps and all gorillas, but but we. don't. Um there has been encroachment on. their environment, but we we actually. try to preserve uh the the uh chimp and. gorilla habitats. Um. and um and I think in a good scenario, uh AI would do the same with with. humans. it would actually foster uh. human civilization and care about human. happiness.

So this is um this is the thing to to. try to achieve I think. Um, >> but what is the what does the landscape. look like if you have Grock competing. with Open AI, competing with all these. different like. how does it work? Like what what if you. have AIs that have been captured by. ideologies that are side by side. competing with Grock? like how do we so.

this is one of the reasons why you felt. like it's important to not just be a an. observer but participate and then have. Grock be more successful and more potent. than these other applications. Yes, as. long as there's at least one AI that is. maximally truth seeeking, curious, and. um you know, and for example, weighs all. you know, human lives equally um does. not favor one race or gender, then um. then then that that that and and people.

are able to look at look at, you know, Grock at XAI and compare that and say, "Wait a second, why are all these other. AIs uh being basically sexist and. racist?" Um. um and uh then then that that causes. some embarrassment for the the other AIS. and then they they they they fix they. you know they they improve they tend to. improve just in the in the same way that. um acquiring Twitter and allowing the. truth to be told and and not suppressing.

the truth um forced the other social. media companies to be more truthful um. by in in the same way having um Gro be a. maximally truth seeeking, curious AI is. will force the other AI companies to um. be also be more truth seeeking and fair. >> And the funniest thing is even though. like the socialists and the Marxists are. in opposition to a lot of your ideas, but if this gets implemented and you.

really can achieve universal high. income, that's the greatest socialist. solution of all time. Like literally no. one will have to work. Uh correct. Um. like I said so so there is a benign. scenario here which I think probably. people will be happy with if if as long. as we we achieve it which is sustainable. abundance. um which is if if um if everyone can. have every like like like if if you ask. people like what's the future that you. want.

>> um and uh I think a future where we. haven't destroyed nature like you can. still we have the national parks we have. the the Amazon rainforest still still. there we haven't paved we haven't paved. the paved the rainforest like the. natural beauty is still there but but. people have nonetheless everyone has. abundance everyone has excellent medical. care. Everyone has whatever goods and. services they want. >> And we just. >> It kind of sounds like heaven. >> It sounds like it is like the ideal.

socialist utopia. And this idea that the. only thing you should be doing with your. time is working in order to pay your. bills and feed yourself sounds kind of. archaic considering the kind of. technology that's at play. >> Yeah. >> Like a world where that's not your. concern at all anymore. Everybody has. money for food. Everybody has abundance. Everybody has electronics in their home. Everybody essentially has a high income. Now you can kind of do whatever you.

want. And your day can now be exploring. your interests doing things that you. actually enjoy doing. Your purpose just. has to shift. Instead of, you know, I'm. a hard worker and this is what I do and. that's how I that's how I define myself. No. Now you can [ __ ] golf all day, you know? You can whatever it is that. you enjoy doing can now be your main. pursuit. >> Yeah. >> Well, that sounds crazy good.

>> Yeah, that's that's that's the benign. scenario that we should be. >> The best ending to the movie is actually. pretty good. >> Yes. um like I think there's there is. still this question of meaning um of. like making sure people don't. uh lose meaning you know like um so. hopefully they can find meaning in ways. that are not that that's not derived. from their work. >> and purpose purpose for things that you. you know find things that you do that. you enjoy but there's a lot of people.

that are independently wealthy that. spend most of their time doing something. they enjoy. >> right. >> and that could be the majority of people. >> pretty much everyone. >> But we'd have to rewire how people. approach life. >> Mhm. >> Which seems to be like acceptable. because you're not asking them to be. enslaved. You're exactly asking them the. opposite. Like no longer be burdened by. financial worries. Now go do what you like. >> Yes. >> Go [ __ ] test pizza.

>> Do whatever you want. >> Um pretty much. Um, so that's uh that's. that's the that's the that's probably. the best case outcome. >> That sounds like the best case outcome. period for the future. If you're looking. at like how much people have struggled. just to feed themselves all throughout. history, food, shelter, safety, if all. of that stuff can be fixed, like how. much would you solve a lot of the crime.

if there was a universal high income? Just think of that. Like how much of. crime is financially motivated? You. know, the greater percentage of people. that are committing crimes live in poor, disenfranchised neighborhoods. >> So if there's no such thing anymore, if. you really can achieve universal high. income, >> yeah, >> that this is it sounds like a utopian. >> Yes. Um I think some people may commit. crime because they like committing. crime. It just some some amount of that. is they just.

>> wild people out there. >> Yeah. Yeah. Um. >> and obviously they've become 40 years. old living a life like that. Now all of. a sudden universal high income is not. going to completely stop their. instincts. >> Yeah. Um I mean I guess if you want to. have like like say read a science. fiction book or some books that that are. probably an accurate or or the the least. inaccurate version of the future. I'd. say I' I'd recommend um the Ian Banks. books called the the culture books. It's. not actually a series. It's a It's like. ai sci-fi books about the future.

They're generally called the culture. books. Yen Banks culture books. It's. worth reading those. >> When did he write these? >> He started writing them in the 70s. Um. and I think he. um the last one I think he was I think. it was written just like around I don't. know maybe 2010 or something. I'm not. sure exactly. >> Yeah. Yeah. >> Scottish author Ian Banks from 87 to. 2012. >> Yeah. Interesting. >> But he but like he wrote the the like.

his first book, Consider Flever. Like he. started writing that in the 70s. >> These books are incredible, by the way. >> Oh, >> incredible books. >> 4.6 stars on Amazon. >> Interesting. >> So, um, >> so this gives me hope. >> Uh, yeah. Yeah. >> This is the first time I've ever thought. about it this way. >> Yeah. Well, I mean, if like.

I often ask people, "What is the future. that you want?" And they have to think. about it for a second cuz, you know, they're usually tied up in whatever the. daily struggles are. But, but you say, "What is the future that you want?" Um, and um, and generally sustainable. abundance, what do these folks say, "What about a future where there's. sustainable abundance?" Like, "Oh, yeah, that's a pretty good future." Um so um. you know if if and and and that that.

future is attainable with AI and. robotics. um but but you know it's it's like I. said there's not every path is a good. path. uh there's this it's but I think. if we if we push it in the direction of. um maximally truth seeeking and curious. then I think AI will want to take to to. take care of humanity and foster uh. foster humanity um.

because we're interesting. um and if it hasn't been programmed to. think that like all straight white male. should die, [laughter]. which Gemini was basically programmed to. do at least at first. Um, you know, they. seem to have fixed it. I hope they fixed. it. >> But don't you think culturally. [laughter]. like, oh, we're getting away from that. mindset and that people realize how. preposterous that all is. >> We are getting away from it. Um,

so, uh, we are getting at least it knows. the AI mostly knows to hide things. But. like like I said, there is that I I. think I still have that as or I had that. as my like pinned post on X which was. like uh hey wait a second guys we still. have every AI except Grock uh is saying. that uh basically straight white male. should die um and this is a problem and. we should fix it. um [snorts]. and you know but simply me saying that. is like tends to generally result in um.

you know them like that is kind of bad. Uh maybe we should just we should not. have all straight white males die. Um I. think they say also all all straight. Asian males should also die as well. like that like uh. like generally [laughter] the generally. the AI and the and the media which which. back back in the day the. the media was um you know racist against. uh black people and sexist against women.

back in the day. Now now it is racist. against uh white people and Asians and. sexist against men. >> Um so they just like being racist and. sexist. I think they just want to change. the target. [laughter] Um so uh but but. really they just shouldn't be uh racist. and sexist at all. Um you know. >> ideally that would be nice. >> That would be nice. Um, and it's kind of. crazy that we were kind of moving in. that general direction till around 2012.

>> and then everything ramped up online and. and everybody was accused of being a. Nazi and everybody was transphobic and. racist and sexist and homophobic and. everything got exaggerated to the point. where it was this wild witch hunt where. everyone was a colomo looking for. racism. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Totally. Um, well well. but but but they they were openly. anti-white and often openly anti-Asian. And then this new sentiment that you. cannot be racist against white people. cuz racism is power and influence.

>> Okay. No, it's not. >> Yeah. Racism is is is racism in the. absolute. Um so um you know and there. just needs to be consistency. So if it's. okay to have uh let's say uh black or. Asian or Indian or pride, it should be. okay to have white pride, too. >> Yeah. Um, so that's just a that's just a. consistency question. Um, so, uh, you.

know, um, if it if it's okay to be proud. of one religion, it should be okay to be. proud of, I I guess all religions. provided they're that they're they're. not like oppressive. >> Yeah. Or or or don't like as long as. part of that religion is not like. exterminating uh people who are not in. that religion type, >> right? Um so uh. it's really just like a consistency. bias. Um. or or just like uh ensuring consistency.

to eliminate uh bias. Um so if it is. possible to be uh racist against. uh one race, it is possible to be racist. against any race. Um so. >> of course logically. >> Yes. >> Yeah. and arguing against that is that's. when you know you're catching. >> it's a it's a logical inconsistency that. makes AIS go insane. >> and people [clears throat]. >> and people go insane. Yes. >> Um. >> but like the the.

like like you can't simultaneously say. um that uh there's the systemic uh. racist oppression but also that races. don't exist. that that race race is a social. construct. like which is it? You know, um you also. can't say that um you know, anyone who. steps foot in America is is. automatically an American except for the. people that originally came here. [laughter]. >> Exactly. Exactly. Except for the.

colonizers. >> Yeah. Except for the evil colonizers who. came here, >> right? >> So which one is it? Like if you if as. soon as you step foot put in a place you. are that you are just as American as. everyone else. >> then um that would have appi if you. apply that consistently then the. original white settlers were also just. as American as everyone else. >> Yeah. Logically. >> Logically. Um, one more thing that I. have to talk to you about before you. leave is the rescuing of the people from.

the space station, which, uh, we talked. about, you were planning it the last. time you were here. >> Um, the f the lack of coverage that that. got in mainstream media was one of the. most shocking things that. >> Yeah, they totally memoryhold that. thing. >> Wild. Yes. Because if it wasn't, >> it's like it didn't exist. Those people. would be dead. They'd be stuck up there. >> Well, they'd they'd probably still be. alive, but they'd they'd be having bone. density issues uh because of prolonged.

exposure to zero gravity. >> Well, they were already up there for. like 8 months, right? >> Yeah. >> Which is an insanely long time. It takes. forever to recover just from that. >> Yeah. They're only supposed to be at the. space station for 3 to 6 months maximum. So, >> one of the things you told me that was. so crazy was that you could have gotten. them sooner, but. >> Yeah. But for political reasons, uh they. didn't they did not want uh SpaceX or me. to be associated with um returning the. astronauts before the election.

>> That is so wild that that's a fact. >> First of all, that. >> we absolutely could have done it. Um so, >> but even though you did do it and you. did it after the election, it received. almost no media coverage anyway. >> Yes. because nothing good can the the. the media which is essentially a far. left prop the legacy mainstream media is. a far-lft propaganda machine. Um and so. anything any story that is positive. about someone who is not part of the.

sort of far-left tribe will not uh get. any coverage. >> I I could save a busload of orphans and. and it it wouldn't get a single news. story. >> Yeah, it's it really is nuts. It it was. nuts to watch because even though it was. discussed on podcasts and it was. discussed on X and it was discussed on. social media, it's still it was a blip. in the news cycle. It was very quick. It. was in and out and because it was a su. successful launch and you did rescue.

those people, nobody got hurt and there. was nothing really to there was no blood. to talk about, >> right? >> Just [ __ ] in and out. >> Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. Well, and and as. as you saw firsthand with the Starship. launch, like Starship is um you know by. you know at least by some some would. consider it to be like the most amazing. uh you know engineering project that's. happening on Earth right now outside of. like you know maybe AI or AI and. robotics but but certainly in terms of a.

spectacle to see it is uh the most. spectacular thing that is happening on. earth right now. is the Starship launch program which. anyone can go and see if they just go to. South Texas and just they can just rent. a hotel room low cost in South Padre. Island or in Brownsville and you can see. the launch and you can drive right right. past the factory because it's on a. public highway. Um but it gets no. coverage. or what coverage it does get was like a.

rocket blew up coverage, >> right? Yeah. Oh, he's a [ __ ] The rocket. blew up. like the the the the Star Sasha. program is vastly. >> vastly more capable than the entire. Apollo moon moon program. Vastly more. capable. This is a spaceship that is. designed to make life multilanetary to. carry uh millions of people across the. heavens to another planet. the the Apollo program could could only.

send astronauts to the moon for a few. hours at a time. Like they could send two the entire. Apollo program could only send. astronauts to visit the moon very. briefly and then for a few hours and. then depart. The starship program could create an. entire uh lunar base with a million. people. You understand the mag the magnitudes. are. >> there's different very different. magnitudes here.

>> So what was the political. >> basically no no coverage of it. >> Yeah. But what I wanted to ask you is. like what so what were the conversations. leading up to the rescue like when you. were like I can get them out way. quicker. >> Yeah. Um. um well I mean you know I raised this a. few times but it was the I was told. instructions came from the White House. that uh you know that that there should. be no attempt to rescue before the.

election. >> That should be illegal. >> That that that really should be a. horrendous miscarriage of justice for. those poor people that were stuck on. that. >> Um yeah it it is it is crazy. Um, >> have you ever talked to those folks. afterwards? Did you have conversations. with them? >> Yeah. I mean, they they're they're not. going to say anything political to, you. know, they're not like they're never. going to. >> say thank you. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. >> Well, that's nice. >> Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. So, um,

>> but the instructions came down from the. White House. He cannot rescue them. because politically this is a a bad hand. of cards. >> I mean, they didn't say because. politically it's a bad hand of cards. They they just said uh they were they. were not interested in uh any rescue. operation before the election. >> Yeah. So. >> what did that feel like? >> I wasn't surprised. >> But it's crazy. >> Yeah,

>> because Biden could have authorized it. and they could have said the the Biden. administration is helping bring those. people back, throw you a little funding, give you some money to do it. the Biden. administration, they funded these people. being returned. >> Uh yeah, the Biden administration was. not exactly my best friend, >> especially especially after I um you. know, you know, helped Trump get elected get. get elected, which I mean some people. >> still think, you know, Trump is like the.

the devil basically. Um, and I mean I. think I think Trump actually he's not. he's is not perfect, but but uh he's not. evil. Trump is not evil. I spent a lot. of time with with him and he's. >> I mean he's a product of his time. Uh. but he is not he's not evil. >> Um. >> no, I don't think he's evil either. But. if you look at the media coverage, >> the media the media treason like he's. super evil. It's pretty shocking if you.

look at the amount of negative coverage. Like one of the things that I looked at. the other day was mainstream media. coverage of you, Trump, a bunch of. different public figures and then. >> 96% negative or something crazy. >> and then Mum Donnie, which is like 95%. positive, >> right? Um I mean Manny is is is is a. charismatic swindler. Um I I I mean you. got to hand it to him like he he does he.

can light up a stage. Um but he has just. been a swindler his entire life. Um and. um. you know and and uh I think. he what he's I mean he's likely to win. He's likely to be mayor of New York New. York City. >> Very likely. >> Yeah. Very likely. I think Poly Market. has it at what what is the. >> 94%? >> Yeah, that sounds pretty likely. >> That's crazy. >> Like I'm not sure who the 6% are, you.

know. >> Um so, so yeah. So that's um. >> what's also like who's on the other. side? The [ __ ] guardian angel guy. with the beret and Andrew Cuomo. [laughter] who doesn't even have a. party. Like they the Democrats don't. even want him. So you have those two. options. Um, >> and then you have the young kids who are. like finally socialism. >> Yeah, they. they don't know what they're talking. about obviously. Um, so you know, like.

you just look at this say how many boats. come from Cuba to Florida and how many. but and how many boats because you know. there's like a constant I always think. like how many boats are accumulating on. the shores of Florida coming from from. Cuba, >> right? Um. there's a there's a whole bunch of free. boats that you could if you want to go. take them back to Cuba. It's pretty. close. >> Yeah. >> But for some reason people don't do. that. >> Why why why why are the boats only.

coming in this direction? >> Um. >> well who is who are the most rabid. capitalists in America? The [ __ ]. Cubans. >> Absolutely. >> Yeah. They're like we've seen how this. story goes. >> We do not want Exactly. >> [ __ ] off. [laughter]. Cubans in Miami, they don't want to hear. any [ __ ] They don't want to hear. any socialism [ __ ] They're like, "No, no, no. We know what this actually. is. This isn't just some [ __ ] dream.". >> Yeah. It's extreme government. oppression. Um. >> that's how it's a nightmare. And like.

the like an obvious way you can tell. which uh which ideology is is the bad. one is um who has to which ideology is. building a wall to keep people in and. prevent them from escaping. >> Right? >> Like so East Berlin built the built the. wall not West Berlin, >> right? >> They built the wall because people were. trying to escape from communism to West. Berlin. But there wasn't anyone going. from West Berlin to East Berlin,

>> right? >> That's why the communists had to build a. wall to keep people from escaping. >> They're going to have to build a wall. around New York City. [laughter]. >> Yeah. That So, so. that an ideology is problematic. If that. ideology has to build a wall to keep. people in with machine guns, >> Yes. >> and shoot you if you try to leave. Also, there's no examples of it being. successful ever. We're only working out. for people. No, there's examples of a. bunch of lies like North Korea. Give.

this land to the state. We'll be in. control of food. No one goes hungry. No. Now, no one can grow food but the. government and we'll tell you exactly. what you eat and you eat very little. >> Right. >> Yeah. What? When you say mom Donny's a. swindler, I know he has a bunch of fake. accents that he used to use. Yeah. >> And you know, but what else has he done. that makes him a swindler? Um. well I I guess if you say uh what I mean.

if if say if you say to any audience. whatever that audience wants to hear uh. instead of what instead of having a. consistent message I would say that that. is a swindly thing to do. Um. and uh. yeah um. yeah but but he is he is charismatic. Um. >> yeah good-looking guy. Smart, charismatic. >> Yeah.

>> Great on a microphone. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. and and what the. young people want to see, >> you know, like this ethnic guy who's. young and vibrant and has all these. socialist ideas align with them and you. know, they're bunch of broke dorks just. out of college like, "Yay, let's vote. for this." And there's a lot of them and. they're they're activated. They're. motivated. >> Um, >> I guess we'll we'll we'll see what. happens here.

>> What do you think happens if he wins? Um. because like 1% of New York City is. responsible for 50% of their tax base, which is kind of nuts. 50% of the tax. revenue comes from 1% of the population. And those are the people that you're. scaring off. You know, you lose one half of 1%. Yeah, I mean hopefully this the stuff he's he. said, you know, about government.

takeovers of of like that all the stores. should be the government basically. Um. >> I don't think he said that. I think he. said government they want to do. government supermarkets, some state-run. or cityrun supermarkets. >> Yeah. Um well, it just the the. government is the DMV at scale. So um. you have to say like do you want the DMV. running your supermarket? >> Right. Um, was your last experience at. the DMV amazing? Uh, and if it wasn't, you probably don't want the government. doing things.

>> Imagine if they were responsible for. getting you blueberries. >> Yeah. [laughter]. It's not going to be good. I mean, the. the the thing about, you know, communism. is is it was it was all bread lines and. bad shoes. Um, you know, do do you want. ugly shoes and bread lines? Because. that's what communism gets you. It's going to be interesting to see what. happens and whether or not they snap out. of it and overcorrect and go to some. Rudy Giuliani type character next cuz. it's been a long time since there was.

any sort of Republican leader there. And we we live in the in the most. interesting of times. um because We we face the. you know simultaneously face. civilizational decline. um and incredible pro prosperity. um and these these timelines are.

interwoven. um so um if Mani's policies are put into. place especially at scale um it it would. be a catastrophic. uh decline in living standards not just. for the rich but for everyone. um uh as as has been the case with with. every um every for every every socialist. experiment um or every Yeah. So.

um but but then as you pointed out the. the irony is that like um the ultimate. capitalist thing of AI and robotics. uh enabling. uh prosperity for all and an abundance. of goods and services actually the. capitalist. uh implementation of AI and robotics. assuming it goes down the the good path. uh is is actually what results in the. communist utopia.

Because fate is fate is an irony. maximizer, >> right? And and an actual socialism of. maximum abundance of highincome. people. >> Universal high income. >> Yeah. >> Like the the problem with communism uh. is is universal low income. Um it's it's. not that everyone gets elevated, it's. that everyone gets oppressed except for. a very small minority of of politicians. who live a lives of luxury. That's. what's happening every time it's been.

done. >> Yeah. Um so um. but then the. the actual communist utopia if everyone. gets anything they want will be will be. if if will be achieved. if it is achieved it will be achieved. via c capitalism. >> because fate is an irony maximizer. >> I feel like we should probably end it on. that. Is there anything else? The most. ironic outcome is the most likely,

especially if entertaining. >> Well, everything has been entertaining. As long as the bad things aren't. happening to you, it's quite. fascinating. And it's never a boring. moment. >> Yes. So there's I do have a theory of. why um like if if if simulation theory. is true then. um it is actually very likely that. um the most interesting outcome is the.

is the most likely because only the. simulations that are interesting will. continue. The simulators will stop any. simulations that are boring because. they're they're not interesting. >> But here's the question about the. simulation theory. Is the simulation run. by anyone or is. >> it would be run by someone? >> It would be run by. >> some some. >> some force. >> the pro the program like in in this. reality that we live in, we we run. simulations all the time. Like so when. we try to figure out if the rocket's.

gonna make it, we run um. thousands sometimes millions of. simulations just to figure out which. which. uh path is the good path for the rocket. and and where can it go wrong, where can. it fail. Um but we when we do these I. say at this point millions of. simulations of of what can happen with. the rocket um we ignore the ones that. are where everything goes right um. because we we we just care about the we.

have we have to address the situations. where it goes wrong. Um so. um so so basically in in in and and for. for AI simulations as well like like all. these things we we keep the simulations. going that are the most interesting to. us. Um. so if simulation theory is accurate if. if it is true who knows um then the uh.

the the simulators will will only they. will continue to run the simulations. that are most interesting there. Therefore from a Darwinian perspective. um the only surviving simulations will. be the interest the most interesting. ones. And in order to um avoid getting. turned off uh the only rule is you must. keep it interesting or you will if or. you will because the boring simulations. will be terminated. >> Are you still completely convinced that. this is a simulation? >> I didn't say I was completely convinced. >> Well, you said it's like the odds of it.

not being are in the billions. But I guess it's not completely cuz. you're saying there's a chance. >> What are the odds that we're in base. reality? Um. well given that given that that we're. able to create increasingly. sophisticated simulations. So if you. think of say video games and how video. games have gone from very simple video. games like Pong with you know two. rectangles and a square to video games. today being um photorealistic.

uh with millions of people playing. simultaneously and all of that has. occurred in our lifetime. So if that trend continues, uh, video games will be. indistinguishable from reality. The. fidelity of the game will be such that. you you don't know if that what you're. seeing is a real video or a fake video. Um, and like AI generated videos at this. point, you like you can sometimes tell.

it's an AI generated video, but often. you cannot tell and soon you will not. really just not be able to tell. So um. if if that's happening in our direct. observation. then and and we're create we'll create. millions if not billions of. photorealistic simulations of reality. then. what are the odds that we're in base. reality. or versus someone else's simulation? Well, isn't it just possible that the.

simulation is inevitable, but that we. are in base reality building towards a. simulation? We're making simulations. Um, so um. we're making simulations. We make like. you can just think of like. photorealistic video games as as being. simulations. >> Mh. Um, and especially as you apply AI. in these video games, the the characters. in the video games will be incredibly.

interesting to talk to. They won't just. have a limited dialogue tree where if. you go to like the the crossbow merchant. or like and you you try to talk about. any subject except buying a crossbow, they just want to talk about selling you. a crossbow. Um, but with with with AI. based non-player characters, you can. you'll be able to have an elaborate. conversation with no dialogue tree. Well, that might be the solution for. meaning for people. Just lock in and you. could be a [ __ ] vampire and whatever. You live in Avatar land. You could do. it. You could do whatever you want. I.

mean, you don't have to think about. money or food. >> Ready Player One. >> Yeah. Literally. Yeah. But with higher. living standards. >> Yeah. >> You don't have to be in a little. trailer. I. >> I mean, I think this people do want to. have some amount of struggle or. something they want to push against. Um. but but it it could be you know playing. a a sports or playing a game or. something. >> It could be easily playing a game and. especially playing a game where you're. now no longer worried about like. physical attributes like athletics like.

bad joints and hips and stuff like that. Now it's completely digital but yet you. do have meaning in pursuing this thing. that you're doing all day. Whatever the [ __ ] that means. It's going to be weird. >> It's going to be interesting. >> It's gonna be very interesting. >> Um the most the most interesting. >> and and usually ironic outcome is the. most likely. >> All right.

>> That's a good predictor of the future. >> Thank you. Thanks for being here. Really. appreciate you. Appreciate your time. You I know you're a busy man, so this. means a lot you come here to do this. Welcome. All right. Thank you. Bye, everybody. >> [music].