Sheriff Nanos believes Nancy Guthrie kidnapping 'was targeted'

ABDUCTED FROM HER TUCSON HOME. LIZ KREUTZ SPOKE TO. LIZ KREUTZ SPOKE TO THE SHERIFF TONIGHT WHO SAYSYS FOR THE. THE SHERIFF TOTONIGHT WHO SAYS FOR THE FIRST TIME, WHILE. FIRST TIME, WHILE THEY'RE NOT DISCLOSING IT, T THEY. THEY'RE NOT DISCLOSINGNG IT, THEY HAVE AN IDEA OF A. DISCLOSING IT, THEY HAVE AN IDIDEA OF A MOTIVE. , MOTIVE. >> Reporter: TONONIGHT, THE PIMA COUNTY. THE PIMA COUNTY SHERIFF GIVING AN UPDATETE ON THE SEARCH. SHERIFF GIVINGNG AN UPDATE ON THE SEARCH FOR NANCY GUTHRIE. FOR NANCY GUTHRIE NEARLY SIX WEEKS SISINCE HER. SINCE HER DISAPPEARANCE. DO YOU THINK THIS. DISAPPEARANCE. DO YOU THINK THIS S SUSPECT COULD STRIKE. SUSPECT COULD STRIKE AGAIN, WHOEVER DID THIS? AGAIN, WHOEVER D DID THIS? >> ABSOLUTELY. THIS? >> ABSOLUTELY. WE BELIEVE WE KNOW. >> ABSOLUTELY. WE BELIEVE WE KNOW WHY HE DID THIS, AND. WE BELIEVE WE KNOW WHY HE DID THIS, AND WE BELIEVE THAT IT. WHY HE DID THIS, AND WE BELIEVE THAT IT WAS TARGETED. WE BELIEVE THAT IT WAS TARGETED. BUT WE CAN'T -- WE'RE. WAS TARGETED. BUT WE CAN'T -- WE'RE NOT 100% SURE OF. BUT WE CAN'T -- WE'RE NOT 100% SURE E OF THAT, SO IT WOULD BE.

NOT 100% SURE OF THTHAT, SO IT WOULD BE SILLY TO TELL PEOPLE, SILLY TO TELL PEOPLE, YEAH, DON'T WORRY Y ABOUT IT. YEAH, DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT. YOU'RE NOT HIS. ABOUT IT. YOU'RE N NOT HIS TARGET. A. TARGET. DON'T THINK FOFOR A MINUTE THAT BECAUSE. DON'T THINK FOR A MINUTE THAT BECAUSE IT HAPPENED TO THE. MINUTE THAT BECAUSE IT HAPPENED TO THE GUTHRIE FAMILY, IT HAPPENED TO THE GUTHRIE FAMILY, , YOU'RE SAFE. GUTHRIE FAMILY, YOU'RE SAFE. NO, KEEP YOUR WITS. YOU'RE SAFE. NO, KEEP YOUR WITS ABOUT T YOU. ABOUT YOU. >> Reporter: WE PRESSED HIM ABOUT. >> Reporter: WE PRESSED HIM ABOUT THAT POTENTIAL. PRESSED HIM ABOUT THAT POTOTENTIAL MOTIVE. NG. MOTIVE. THERE IS SOMETHIHING THAT'S COME OUT IN. THAT'S COME OUT IN THE INVESTIGATION THTHAT GIVES YOU A. THE INVESTIGATION THAT GIVES Y YOU A SENSE OF MOTIVE HERE. SENSE OF MOTIVE HERE AND WHY THIS PERSON DID THIS? AND WHY THIS PERSON N DID THIS? >> I THINK IT'S COME. DID THIS? >> I T THINK IT'S COME OUT FROM DAY ONE. OUT FROM DAY ONE. I THINK FROM DAY ONE WE HAD STRONG BELIEFS. I THINK FROM DAY ONE WE HAD STRONG BELILIEFS ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED, WE HAD STRONG BELIEFS ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED, AND THOSE BELIEFS. ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED, AND THOSE BELIEFS HAVEN'T DIMINISHED.

HAVEN'T DIMINISHED. >> DO YOU BELIEVE IT WAS A BURGLALARY GONE. >> DO YOU BELIEVE IT WAS A BURGLARY GONE WRONG? WAS A BURGLARY GONONE WRONG? >> I'M NOT GOING TO. SE. >> I'M NOT GOING TO GET INTO THOHOSE THEORIES. GET T INTO THOSE THEORIES. WE HAVE OUR BELIEFS. THEORIES. WE HAVE OUR BELIEFS.S. EVERYONE ELSE HAS. WE HAVE OUR BELIEFS. EVERYONE ELSE HAS THEIRS. EVERYONE ELSE HAS THEIRS. >> Reporter: HE SAYS. THEIRS. >> Reporter: HE SAYS SHE'S INTENTIONALLY. SHE'S INTENTIONALLY WITHHOLDING THEIR THEORY CITING THE. WITHHOLDING THEIR THEORY CITING G THE INTEGRITY OF THE. INTEGRITY OF THE INVESTIGATION. HE CONFIRMRMED. HE CONFIRMED INVESTIGATORS HAVE BEEN ASKING ABOUT. INVESTIGATORS HAVE BEEN ASKSKING ABOUT POTENTIAL INTERNET. BEEN ASKING ABOUT POTENTIAL INTERNET ISSUES THE NIGHT OF. POTENTIAL INTERNET ISSUES THE NIGHT OF NANCY'S ABDUCTION AND. ISSUES THE NIGHT OF NANCY'S ABDUDUCTION AND SAID THEY'RE LOOKING. A. SAID THEY'RE LOOKING INTO THE POSSIBLE A A WI-FI JAMMER COULD. WI-FI JAMMER COULD HAVE BEEN USED OR IF THERE WAS SOME OTHER. HAVE BEEN USED OR IF THERE WAS SOME OTHER ELECTRICAL DISRUPTION.