Clintons could be held in contempt of Congress after refusing to testify about Epstein

PAR OF THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE'S INVESTIGATION INTO. OVERSIGHT COMMITTETEE'S INVESTIGATION INTO JEFFREY EPSTEIN. INVESTIGATATION INTO JEFFREY EPSTEIN. RYAN NOBLES REPORTS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. RYAN NOBLES REPORTS FRFROM CAPITOL HILL. RYAN NOBLES REPORTS FROM CAPITOL HILL. >> Reporteter: TONIGHT, FROM CAPITOL HILL. >> Reporter: TONIGHT, FORMERER PRESIDENT BILL. >> Reporter: T TONIGHT, FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON AND HIS WIFE, CLINTON AND HIS WIFE, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON. FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARARY CLINTON ARE FACING THE. G. ARE FACING THE PROSPECTCT OF BEING HELD IN CONTEMPT OF. HELD IN CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS. THIS AFTERER FAILING TO. CONGRESS. THIS AFTERER FAILING TO APPEAR FOR A CLOSED. THIS AFTER FAILING TO APPEAR FOR A A CLOSED DOOR DEPOSITION AS. DOOR DEPOSITION AS PART OF THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITITTEE'S. PART OF THE HOUSE OVERSIGHT T COMMITTEE'S INVESTIGATION INTO. OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE'S INVESTIGATION INTO THE JEFFREY EPSTEIN. L. THE JEFFREY Y EPSTEIN SCANDAL. >> I THINK IT'S VERY. SCANDAL. >> I THINK IT'S VERY DISAPPOINTING. >> I THINK IT'S VERY DIDISAPPOINTING. AS A RESULT OF BILL. DISAPPOINTING. AS A RESULT OF BILL CLINTON NOT SHOWINING. AS A RESULT OF BILL CLINTON NONOT SHOWING UP FOR HIS LAWFUL. CLINTON NOT SHOWING UP FOR HIS LAWFUL L SUBPOENA.

SUBPOENA. >> Reporter: THE CLINTONS INFNFORMED THE. >> Reporter: THE CLINTONS INFORMEMED THE COMMITTEE THEY HAD. COMMITTEE THEY HAD NOTHING MATERIAL TO OFFER R THE. OFFER THE INVESTIGATION. AND IN A LETTER TO. INVESTIGATION. AND IN A LETTER TOTO CHAIRMAN JAMES COMER, AND IN A A LETTER TO CHAIRMAN JAMES COMER, THEY ARGUED HIS. CHAIRMAN JAMES COMER, THEY ARGUED HIS SUBPOENAS WERE. THEY ARGUED HIS SUBPOENANAS WERE LEGALLY INVALID. SUBPOENAS WERE LEGALLY INVALID. WRITING EVERY PERSON. LEGALLY INVALID. WRITING EVERY PEPERSON HAS TO DECIDE WHEN. WRITING EVERY PERSON HAS TO DECIDE WHENEN THEY HAVE SEEN OR HAD. THEY HAVE SEEN OR HAD ENOUGH AND ARE READY TO FIGHT FOR THIS. TO FIGHT FOR THIS COUNTRY, ITS PRINCIPLES AND ITS. COUNTRY, ITS PRINCIPLES AND ITSTS PEOPLE, NO MATTER THE. PRINCIPLES AND ITS PEOPLE, NO MATATTER THE CONSEQUENCES. T. CONSEQUENCES. FOR US, NOW IS THAT TIME. FOR US, NOW IS THAHAT TIME. THE FORMER PRESIDENT. TIMEME. THE FORMER PRESIDENT HAS LONG DENIED ANY. THE FORMER PRESIDENT HAS LONG DENIEIED ANY WRONGDOING. WRONGDOING. BUT REPUBLICANS POINT OUT THAT CLINTON H HAS. BUT REPUBLICANS POINT OUT THAT CLINTON HAS REPEATEDEDLY APPEARED. OUT THAT CLINTON HAS REPEATEDLY APPEARED IN PHOTOS AND.

IN PHOTOS AND DOCUMENTS CONNECTED TO EPSTEIN. DOCUMENTS CONNECTED TO EPSTEIN. ARGUING HE HAS. TO EPSTEIN. ARGUING HE HAS INFORMATIOION TO. ARGUING HE HAS INFORMATION TO PROVIDE. INFORMATION TO PRPROVIDE. >> NO ONE IS ACCUSING. PROVIDE. >> NO ONE IS ACCUSING BILL CLINTON O OF ANY. >> NO ONE IS ACCUSING BILL CLINTON OF ANY WRONGDGDOING. WRONGDOING. WE JUST HAVE QUESTIONS. WE JUST HAVE QUESTIONONS. >> Reporter: MOST. >> Reporter: MOST DEMOCRATS WE SPOKE TO TODADAY EITHER AVOIDED. TODAY EITHER AVOIDED THE QUESTION OR DEFENDEDED THE. THE QUESTION OR DEFENDNDED THE CLINTONS' DECISION TO. DEFENDED THE CLINTONS' DECISION TO SKIP THE DEPOSITION. CLINTONS' DECISION TOO SKIP THE DEPOSITION. BUT DEMOCRAT RO. SKIP THE DEPOSITION. BUT DEMOCRCRAT RO KHANNA WHO WROTE THE. BUT DEMOCRAT RO KHANNA WHO WROTE T THE LAW TO FORCE THE DOJ. KHANNA WHO WROTE THE LAW TO FORCE THE DOJ TO RELEASE ALL FILES. TO RELEASE ALL FILES HAD A DIFFERENT TAKE. DO YOU THINK THE. HAD A DIFFERENT TAKE. DO YOU THINK THE PRPRESIDENT SHOULD HAVE. PRESIDENT SHOULD HAVE APPEARED? >> HE SHOULDLD APPEAR. APPEARED? >> HE SHOUOULD APPEAR. I HAVE ALWAYS SAID. >> HE SHOULD APPEAR. I HAVE ALWAYS SAID THIS NEEDS TO BE. THIS NEEDS TO BE TRANSPARENT. EVERYONE INVOLVED. TRANSPARENT. EVERYONE INVOLVED SHOULD BE PROVIDING.

EVERYONE INVOLVED SHOULD BE PROVIDING AN EXPLANATION.