Trump SCREWED as Reflecting Pool CONFESSION SINKS CASE!!!

There was no criminal, vandalism, or. felonious work in the middle of the. night with knives and box cutters to rip. up the 7 acres of pool liner of Donald. Trump's reflecting pool project. And I. found a piece of evidence that should be. and hopefully will be used by former. Olympic cyclist Davie Hearn in his. criminal case to prove his innocence. And where did I find it? It was hiding. in plain sight on the website for the. company hired by Donald Trump to do the.

installation of the liner. The Atlantic Industrial Company posted. that they are making the repairs. pursuant to a warranty. And what does. that mean in my world? That means that. they're not claiming and their insurance. company is not claiming that there was. any criminal vandalism, any third-party. intentional act that would have. destroyed the warranty. They are. admitting that their shotty work, substandard work, it that the.

installation was not fit for its. intended purpose, not fit for. merchantability. And therefore, by saying that it's. warranty work that they're doing to fix. the pool, they are confessing as an agent of. Donald Trump. that the pool problem is not the result. of Davie Hearn touching a 2-ft by 2-ft. section of floating liner. And now we've got the new recording. about what is happening down there, the.

destruction of evidence despite motions. that have been filed to prevent the. destruction of that evidence. Is the FBI collection team collecting. evidence, or are they destroying it? Donald Trump claimed there were. chemicals that were poured into the. pool. That pool's been drained three. times. That evidence has been destroyed. And there has not been one, one public. disclosure of any video, any photograph that demonstrates that.

Davi Hearn violently tried to rip a. piece of the liner and committed the. felonious, willful, malicious. destruction of federal property, meaning. they're not going to be able to prove. that at trial in September. when that case goes to trial. And I think Norm Eisen, the lawyer for. Davi Hearn, should be using the warranty. language that I found to say to the. jury, "There's a simple solution.

There's a simple This isn't a mystery of. why that. reflecting pool's 7-acre system failed. after a week of application. The contractor admits that they made the. error and that they're making the fix. pursuant to a warranty. If anybody had a. vested interest. to. to investigate and determine that their. warranty had been violated by the. violent acts of another, it's the installa- it's the installer.

But they didn't do it. And they didn't claim it. And their. insurance company didn't claim it. That's how I know it's true. And if you. get the insurance company to agree, it's. got to be true. And every document that's been filed in. this case helps Davi Hearn's. uh defense in his prosecution, including the only piece of paper filed. by the government from the National Park. Service, where they also do not claim. that Davi Hearn's felonious, malicious.

destruction is the cause of the failure. of the Reflecting Pool project. I'm. Michael Popok. You're on the Midas Touch. Network and Legal AF. Two parts of the story, two halves that. I will join as one. I went on the website for uh Atlantic. Industrial Coating. And I see, cuz they're proud to be doing. the project that they said they are. making the repair pursuant to the. warranty. In my world, that means they.

are admitting that there was an. installation problem consistent with. what the Washington Post reported. The way that was installed in those 7. acres, 7 acres, was to apply first some a substrate. called Rhino 5000 and then a polyuretha. dyed to blue American flag blue on top. So, picture it as a two-layer cake.

They couldn't apply it just in one fell. swoop, so they did it in rectangular. sections. The sections come together at. seams. That is often the root cause of water. penetration and infiltration in a water. what amounts to a waterproofing system. I've been involved in cases in the past, when I was a younger lawyer, involving. membranes, waterproofing, and water. penetration and other construction type. cases that are similar.

So, at the seams, it looks like they. didn't properly apply the product. They. didn't rough up the edges and apply it. one on top of the other to create a. seal. Instead, there is a seam, water got. under the seam, and you now have. floating huge sections of lighter from. the bottom of the pool. Let's go to Davie Hearn's case for a. moment. Jeanine Pirro declares, Davie Hearn violently.

grabbed a piece of it and yanked it. Davie Hearn's testimony, it was floating. already and I touched it. Okay? It's why these cases should never. be brought. I've seen the video of Davie Hearn. getting arrested. He just done a 52-mi. bike ride cuz he's an Olympic cyclist. former. Got off, wanted to see the reflecting. pool, saw a floating souvenir, went to. touch it. That's the case. There's no evidence, you can see from. the video, of him having a box cutter, a. knife, scuba gear, s- you know, uh.

diving to the bottom of the pool and. ripping it up cuz the problem is at the. bottom of the pool. And the bottom is coming to the top. You know? But to hear Shapiro talk about. it, you'd think this guy was a one-man. wrecking crew and wrecked a a um. seven-acre project by touching a 2-ft by. 2-ft piece. Play the clip. >> By Hearn's own admission, on June 19th,

he reached down into the pool. Our evidence further shows that the. National Park Service employees observed. Hearn actually forcefully and violently. pulling up and removing the bottom liner. with both hands. According to witnesses, Hearn damaged. approximately 2 square feet of sealants. from the bottom of the pool.

A parks [snorts] employee actually told. Hearn to stop, to stop his behavior and. stop what he was doing. Hearn reacted by shouting at that parks. employee, saying that she cared too much about the. reflecting pool and why did she even. care since it wasn't her pool. Now, Mr. Hearn's behavior was.

characterized by witnesses as. belligerent, rude, and disrespectful according to. National Park Service employees that. witnessed the event. >> If I'm Norm Eisen, who's the lawyer for. Davie, I make a big deal out of the warranty. language that I found. Um. because in the world of commercial. litigation and products liability and. construction litigation that I've. practiced, when when a contractor.

is being dragged back to a job to make. repairs and he claims it's under. warranty, that means he's confessing. there was a problem with the workmanship. of the installation. You had a several. contractors who were who had never. worked together working on this project. One doing one base layer, one doing the. other layer. There was no spec. You. know, they couldn't go look it up in. chat GBT how to do a 7-acre installation. in a week. And it failed. And it happens. It.

happens in construction sites every day. There is no such thing as a perfect. construction job or a perfect uh build. or installation. And this is an example. of it. So, the warranty, if there was a way, I. assure you, for Atlantic Industrial to. claim that the third party, like Davie. Hearn, had breached the warranty and for. them not to come back, they would have. done it. And if they wouldn't have done. it, those kind of claims are insured.

Their insurance company would have made. them do it. >> [clears throat]. >> But they didn't. Because Davie Hearn did not destroy the. reflecting pool, neither did the other. three or four people who were arrested. for misdemeanors. That pool is failing. because of a combination of incompetence. in the White House, incompetence in the. application process and the contractor. selected, the lack of forethought and. planning, the lack of involvement of. experts, you know, who had any similar.

project. I mean, this is a what we call. a sui generis project. This is a project. one of one. It's a one-off project. There's no 7-acre reflecting pool. Nobody has that on their portfolio, on. their resume. They had a They had to make it up in the. field, right? Field changes happen all. the time, and they got it wrong. And And what the Washington Post noted. is these huge sections that had been. conjoined together had separated because. water had penetrated it, and it floated.

to the top. Then you add on top of that the. malfunctioning. filtration system, which was supplied by. another Trump crony, a two-time. convicted felon for election fraud, >> [clears throat]. >> who um. his company, Green Water, appropriate, pumped in ozone into the water supply. It failed after the second day. It's not the first time that filtration. process failed. It failed in a.

Tiahuanaco River project the government. also paid for. So, you have untested, faulty science being used for. filtration. >> [clears throat]. >> You've got incompetence in workmanship. and installation. And then, wrong place, wrong time. Davey. Hearn touching a liner floating in the. pool. Here's Norm Eisen. giving I hope everybody confidence about. that jury, and I'm going to talk next. about how the prosecutor's going to lose. that case. Play the clip.

>> Uh hello, everyone. I'm Norman Eisen of. the Democracy Defenders Fund, co-counsel. for Mr. Hearn, together with Mary. Dormant of the Washington Litigation. Group. Today, Davey Hearn PLED NOT GUILTY. BECAUSE HE IS NOT GUILTY. IF MR. HEARN can be charged with a. felony. for touching the reflecting pool, every.

American is at risk. >> That's right. And every American should. be alarmed about this prosecution. This indictment reflects the. administration's effort to scapegoat. Davey. and to shift blame for their own. failures. >> Now, let me end it with what the. prosecution's going to have to prove to. a very skeptical, jaundiced eyed.

jury in DC. A jury. that is pulled from the District of. Columbia that's been abused by Donald. Trump since almost day one. With a takeover, their their police. chief and and mayor almost being canned. or sidelined in policing, National Guard. and Army marching on them, a siege. mentality. and 150 homicides. to boot. And you think those jurors, those six or nine jurors in a in a in a.

DC court with a federal prosecutor on. the other side asking them to convict a. felony with a 10-year prison sentence. for a guy who touched a liner given. these he said, she said facts? You think. that's going to happen or they're going. to think kindly on that case? It's going. to be another loss or it should be for. Jeanine Pirro. She's got to prove two. things and she can't prove either. One is malicious mal- malice, malicious. uh destruction. Malice is a legal term, but it's it is.

what it sounds like. It's somebody doing. something not accidentally, not. negligently, um not even intentionally. It's. intentional plus. a bad heart, bad mind, criminal mens rea. we call it, criminal mind. Davey Hearn is the living embodiment. of somebody who's innocent. And when he testifies, which I'm sure he. will. uh at some point. Uh you know, they have. a choice not to under the Fifth. Amendment, but I think he testifies.

Against no evidence. No evidence. No video. No chemical. They've destroyed. everything. They pumped out the water. They've. They've They've uh They haven't. They've been doing uh. evidence collection analysis. All trampling over the the site. And so. They're never going to prove malice. And Davey Hearn's lawyers, Norm Eisen, are going to remind the jury of that.

And the burden beyond a reasonable doubt. is on the government. Even if they prove that, they got to. prove a thousand dollars worth of. damage. This was a two-foot by two-foot. section that was floating. Let's assume even he ripped it up. I. mean, how do you rip it up? With what? With what tool? But [snorts] even he says it was. floating, he touched it. They say he he. violently yanked it. All right. Show the. Show me a video on that. How in a seven-acre.

site How many football fields is that? Seven-acre site Is that Is that like 25. football fields? A two-foot by two-foot piece of the. turf? You touched it. You burned it. You. ripped it up. That's a thousand dollars. worth of damage. It was a 1.7 million-dollar project. Do. the math. So they'll never be able to prove a. thousand dollars worth of damage to send. this guy away for 10 years.

And even if the jury somehow rolls over. on the right side of the wrong side of. the bed, doesn't like Davey Hearn, doesn't like Norm Eisen, loves the. prosecutor, and against all of what I've. just laid out, convicts, you still got a. judge who could who could overturn the. jury verdict. on a motion. Uh. we call judgment notwithstanding the. verdict. or. uh to nullify the jury result. And then sentencing. I mean they could.

sentence him to nothing. That judge already let. uh Davie Hearn. walk free without a bond and did not. adopt the Department of Justice's. request that he be banned from going to. the reflecting pool. So she's already. skeptical and she it's not She's not. going to handle the fact-finding, that's. the jury, but she is in charge of. sentencing. So I'm glad we're here together. You're. on Legal AF. I'm about to start a large. vacation.

but [clears throat] working vacation, a. busman's holiday they call it. So you'll be seeing me regularly on. Midas Touch and on Legal AF. Take a. minute, hit the free subscribe button. over on Legal AF YouTube and thank you. for your generous spirit and heart. We've already crossed 1,170,000. subscribers, 700 million views, all. because of you. I have one last ask. Check to see if you're subscribed. And because it costs you nothing but. means the world to us, it really does.

Uh help us get to that plateau. Till my. next report, I'm Michael Popok. >> In collaboration with the Midas Touch. Network, we just launched [music] the. Legal AF YouTube channel. Help us build. this pro-democracy [music] channel where. I'll be curating the top stories at the. intersection of law and politics. Go to. YouTube now and free subscribe at Legal. [music] AF MTN. That's at Legal AF MTN.