
🚨Trump’s LAST-DITCH CASE Just BLEW UP in 24 HOURS!!!!
The Trump regime's criminal case right. before the midterm elections against FBI. Director James Comey has just backfired. in the regime's face. And I'm not. talking about the 8647. sea shell case, although that one's. backfired in their face already as well. I'm talking about the Trump regime. criminal complaint alleging that on. October 5th, 2016, James Comey and a. group of FBI agents leaked information.
to the New York Times about Yahoo, saying that Yahoo said to have aided US. email surveillance by adapting a spam. filter. I know a spam filter story. involving Yahoo on October 5th, 2016. Huh? Let me explain to you what's. happening here. So, on October 5th, 2026, the Trump regime filed a criminal. complaint against James Comey in.
Washington DC federal court. But the. Trump regime immediately filed a motion. to keep the criminal complaint under. seal cuz they said there could be a. number of co-conspirators in the Yahoo. spam filter case. So we have to keep. this super secret. So Comey knew about. this back on October 5th. Now you fast. forward to now. And James Comey has been. fighting for this case to be unsealed so. that the public can see what the hell is.
actually happening here. And in the. interim period of time, James Comey has. filed a motion to dismiss, which I think. he's going to prevail in. What's. important to note here at the outset is. that the Trump regime did not indict. James Comey. They did something called. filing an information or basically. filing a criminal complaint. Now, in. federal courts, where we're dealing with. felony counts, which is what is being.
alleged here by the Trump regime, you. eventually need an indictment. The law. allows the Department of Justice to. first bring a criminal complaint or. information if in 30 days after service. of said complaint, said summons of. complaint or the arrest 30 days. thereafter, you then have to go and get. an indictment. You have to go before a. grand jury and present these facts. The. Trump regime has not done that yet. Why?
Because it would likely be rejected by a. grand jury. And as part of Donald. Trump's deranged behavior before the. midterms, he wanted this filed and he. wanted this filed now. And they don't. think through the second and third and. fourth level consequences to these. things. Now, James Comey immediately. filed a motion to dismiss. And now that. the federal judge has unsealed this. entire case, we can see everything. that's taken place from October 5th, 2026 until today, October 26, 2026. And.
at the end of last week, uh, Comey filed. this motion to dismiss. And it's pretty. straightforward. Statute of limitations, which is the time frame within which you. can bring a certain type of case. This. case alleging national defense secrets. were leaked to the New York Times. because of some Yahoo spam filter thing, whatever the New York Times even. reported. It's just a ridiculous and. frivolous thing to begin with. I don't. even think this is a national defense.
secret at all. There is a five-year. statute of limitation. So, let's count. together. October 5th, 2016. Five years. later, October 5th, 2021. So, we are. well past said statute of limitation. Well, the Trump regime argues that there. is a very special statute that deals. with espionage cases that extends the. statute of limitations by another 5. years. if you can show that there was.
espionage involved. And so the Trump. regime says this was not just national. defense. This was espionage. So extend. the statute of limitations right from. October 5th, 2021 to October 5th, 2026. So the Trump regime sloppy as hell. lawyers at the DOJ wait till the very. last day of the statute of limitations. and they think they're so smart. They're. going to say this is espionage. What the. hell? This has nothing to do with. espionage. But then James Comey's.
lawyers say, "Uhhuh. Okay. You do. realize that the espionage extension of. the statute of limitations requires an. indictment. It literally says in the. statute that the statute of limitations. on a national defense or other case will. be extended five years if the indictment. relates to espionage and that a grand. jury indictes with an espionage.
uh element to the charge. And then the. Trump regime has responded actually the. indictment and a criminal complaint are. the same thing. and James Comey and his. lawyer's like, "No, they're like. different things." That's like saying. basketball and golf are the same thing. because they involve balls, right? No, they're not the same thing. An. indictment is an indictment. It has to. go before a grand jury. The grand jury. indictes, and the statute uses the word.
indictment if you're going to extend 5. years. And then here, you just filed a. criminal complaint on October 5th, 2026. And that's not an indictment. So that's. what Comey argues. The Trump regime has. since responded and they said, "Nope, same thing. Doesn't matter. Premature. Let this case continue and we'll have to. get the indictment pretty soon." That's. what the Trump regime is arguing. The. federal judge will ultimately now have. to make that ruling. In any event, if. you pulled back for a second, do you see.
how frivolous this thing is? The Trump. regime is alleging that Comey in October. 5th, 2016 said something to the New York. Times about a spam filter involving. Yahoo. This is where they're going with. it. Prosecutors say that an internal. government email containing proposed. talking points circulated among about 30. intelligence community personnel. The. New York Times published its article. within 3 hours. Prosecutors alleged that.
the spam filter case contained. classified information when Charlie. Savage in this New York Times article. wrote about Yahoo's cooperation with US. surveillance. That's what you're saying. was an espionage violation by James. Comey. So on the merits, this case, can. you believe it? Is more frivolous than. the sea shell case on the merits. But. set aside the merits. Just talk about. procedure. This case should have been.
brought in 2021. So you wait until the very date of the. statute of limitations. October 5th of. 2026. File a criminal complaint. Then. don't read the statute that says there. needs to be an espionage indictment, not. criminal complaint, to extend the. statute of limitations. So that's what. this is about. James Comey has now put. out a statement. Here's what he has to. say. Play this clip. Well, they're back. again. It would almost be funny if it. weren't such an appalling abuse of the.
Department of Justice, one that we. cannot become numb to. Nothing's changed. with me. I'm still innocent. I'm still. not afraid of these people. And I still. believe in the independent federal. judiciary. And I'm still lucky to have an amazing. family and an incredible group of. lawyers. And we'll stand up in court and. fight the latest and whatever comes. after this. The next couple years are. going to be hard for all of us. It's. really important that we stand straight. and keep the faith in America.
This episode is brought to you by the. Freedom from Religion Foundation. Might. asy be very clear. Democracy means power. comes from the people, not from kings, not from politicians claiming God is on. their side and not from government. deciding whose beliefs count. But right. now, as the midterms approach, we're. seeing a coordinated push to blur the. line between church and state. from. public schools to public policy to the. very story we tell about America. That's. not freedom, that's control. The Freedom.
from Religion Foundation is fighting. back. FFRF works to keep state and. church separated and to make sure freeth. thinkers, atheists, agnostics, humanists, and non-religious Americans. are not erased from our democracy. because the First Amendment protects all. of us. Visit ffrf.us/midus. us/midas. or text midas to 511511 to join or learn. more. Go to ffrf.
us/midas. or text midasme. to 511511. Before election day, join ffr and help. defend secular democracy. Text MIDIS to. 511511 today. Text fees may apply. Now folks, this comes on the same day as. James Comey's daughter, Moren Comey, won. a federal her federal lawsuit against. the Trump regime for unlawful.
termination. She's entitled to back pay. and she's entitled to reinstatement. because the Trump regime unlawfully. fired her. A federal judge said that the. undisputed facts basically show that she. was fired because she was James Comey's. daughter, that she was an accomplished. prosecutor in the Southern District of. New York. She was handling top cases. And then she got a email from the Trump. regime DOJ saying that they were firing. her. There are certain civil servant.
protections that were not afforded to. her. They did not go through the process. to fire her. And so she'll get her back. She'll get reinstatement. And of course, the Trump regime will try to appeal that. and they'll continue to harass her. But. both of this stuff happened on the very. same day. Just so you can see what Comey. was charged with. Let me just This is. it. It's a two-pager. Again, this is not. an indictment. This did not go before. the grand jury. And the espionage. statute to increase the statute of. limitations by 5 years, which would make.
it October 5th, 2026, requires that. there be an indictment. And here is what. it says. on or about October 5th, 2016. The Trump DOJ alleges in the District of. Columbia and elsewhere the defendant. James Brian Comey while lawfully. possessing, accessing, controlling, and. being entrusted with any document. writing, code book, signal, sketch, photograph, note relating to national. defense and information relating to the.
national defense, and having reason to. believe such information could be used. to injure the United States and to. advantage any foreign nation knowingly. and willfully. be communicated, delivered, transmitted, and cause that. information to be communicated, delivered, and transmitted to a person. entitled to receive it. All in violation. of 18USC section 793D. And then the second count was basically. a kind of a repeat allegation. Upon. conviction of the offense, James Comey.
shall forfeit to the United States. pursuant to the statute. And then it. says um you know uh it's signed by the. DOJ lawyers who in my opinion should. lose their bar licenses for bringing. something so horrific. This is the. article that they alleged violates our. national security from October 5th, 2016. Yahoo said to have aided US email. surveillance by adapting spam filter. And the way we know a lot of the details. is because this whole file has become.
unsealed. So there were like 12 13. documents now that we have access to and. you can see that Comey requested that. this entire file be unsealed which the. court just granted. That's how we have. all these filings from October 5th to. October 26th of 2026. And we have the United States motion to. a response to Comey's motion to dismiss. And here's what it says. The United. States opposes Mr. Comey's motion to.
dismiss the information. Mr. Comey moves. to dismiss the information purely on an. incomplete statutory reading of the. text. He asserts that section 19 of the. Internal Security Act of 1950. unambiguously states the government may. invoke that extended period, that's the. extended 5 years for espionage only by. obtaining a grand jury indictment and. that a criminal information which the. government can issue unilaterally. without grand jury involvement does not.
suffice. Mr. Comey also contends that an. indictment fundamentally differs from an. information and that Congress. intentionally omitted the information. from section 19 pointing to other. statutory provisions. Mr. Comey is. mistaken. Then the government goes on to. argue Mr. Comey's motion should be. denied for two reason. Fundamentally, the motion is premature. This. prosecution proceeds currently by an. information and there is no indictment.
to be dismissed. Yeah, Comey knows that. He wants to dismiss the information. What are you talking about? Then it goes. on to say, second, the information here. is timely under section 19 of the. Internal Security Act. That's what adds. the 5 years if it's espionage. Then it. says section 19 sets the limitation. period for the underlying espionage. offenses at 10 years. And under 18 USC. section 32A2A, the statute of. limitations period is satisfied whether. the indictment is found or the.
information is instituted. The case. comes down to a syllogism. Section 3282. makes a prosecution timely if the. indictment is found or the information. is instituted within the period that. governs the offense. Section 19 does not. displace that rule. It supplies only the. period. For a violation of section 793, that period is 10 years. Congress did. not need the word information. It had no.
reason to write it. Yeah, it did have. reason to write it. If you're going to. extend a 5-year to a 10-year, you want. to make sure that there's an indictment. and not some frivolous action by way of. information. It's obvious why Congress. did not include the word information the. way the other statute did because it. would be easy just to say information or. indictment. The indictment is a higher. bar. You need a grand jury. And so if. you're going to extend 5 years, a grand. jury has to find probable cause of.
espionage. Congress was precisely aware. This is the exact type of case they. wanted to avoid. That's the legislative. history of this. So that's what the. Trump regime is arguing right over. there. It's absolutely frivolous and. disgusting, but I wanted to give you. that complex statutory breakdown so you. understand. Thanks for watching. We. appreciate you. We're grateful for you. Thank you everybody. And uh get WTF. America, the book that Elon Musk is. trying to suppress on X by putting adult. content warnings on it when people post. about it. Thanks. One book, a whole lot.
of WTF. [music] My brothers and I wrote. WTF America about how we got into this. mess. the millions of you who refuse to. back down and how we get out. Scan the. QR code, click the link in the. description, or find it anywhere books. are sold and order today. [music].