Trump PANICS as SENATE CLOSES IN…

It looks like the Trump regime's top. federal prosecutor from the Southern. District of Texas wants some attention. Yep. The United States Attorney Aaron. Wrights, who's the US Attorney for the. Southern District of Texas, sent a very. threatening letter to Democratic Senator. Blumenthal, who once the Democrats fully. take control of the Senate in January. Blumenthal will lead the Senate. Judiciary uh committee over there. In. the House, the Judiciary Committee will.

be run by Democratic Congress member. Jamie Rascin and Blumenthal and Raskin. will be working very close together. But. Aaron Wright, the US attorney in the. Trump regime for the Southern District. of Texas, he wants some attention. He. writes a threatening letter to Senator. Blumenthal and says, "After the. election, Senator Blumenthal and his. allies think they can intimidate. Americans for their constitutionally. protected associations with President. Trump. Congress is not a weapon to be. wielded against the American people. I'm.

taking the first step to stop this abuse. of power. Stop draping yourself in the. American people." Okay? The American. people rebuked you. They rebuked the. mafia protection racket that is the DOJ. that covers up child sex trafficking. rings in the Epstein files that. affirmatively works to help the. criminals that works to pardon the worst. of the worst. And the American people. demand that corruption be investigated.

It's not a constitutionally protected. association that is being investigated. It is crimes that are being. investigated. And you think about. arguments that Donald Trump previously. made when he was convicted of felonies. And you think about the types of. arguments that were made then and it. would be like, well, there was an. absolute or when he was charged after. the January 6th insurrection by special. counsel Jack Smith and what Trump's.

arguments were, he would always try to. make these arguments that like it's a. first amendment issue. It's a first. amendment issue. And it's like, yeah, we. have a first amendment right, but if you. start to speak crimes and conspiracies. to commit crimes like overthrowing the. government or massive criminal collusion. to engage in criminal acts. That's not a. first amendment. You can't be like, well, I said it. It was speech, so I'm. protected by the First Amendment. And. this is how they perverted and distorted.

the Constitution. But it's also how they. always try to cover up their criminality. by saying, "Don't attack the Americans.". No, no. What's being looked at is the. criminality of the regime and what you. did. It's like, "Don't attack the. troops." No, no one's attacking the. troops. They're saying that Hegs. launched a catastrophic war that. resulted in the slaughter of children in. elementary schools and sports halls and. has been killing people off the coast of. Venezuela in war crimes. It's not we.

don't support the troop. Of course, we. support the troops. We support the. troops and the American people so much. that that's why these things need to be. investigated because this regime is. attacking the troops and attacking the. people. So, you look at this letter that. is sent from the United States. attorney's office from the Southern. District of Texas to a senator for. conducting oversight. can't emphasize. enough how deeply unprecedented. unprecedented this is and how just. messed up like like it's just such a.

foreign concept to a democracy that you. would attack a co-equal branch of. government's right to conduct oversight. which is sacrosanked in the US. constitution here's the subject demand. to preserve documents electronically. stored information and tangible things. then it says conduct implicating 18 USC. section 241 in 242 basically implicating. massive major federal crimes of threats. and intimidation. Dear Senator.

Blumenthal, in recent weeks you have. threatened citizens for associating. themselves with the president and other. public officials. Yet the freedom to. engage in association for the. advancement of beliefs and ideas is an. inseparable aspect of our constitution. and a way of life. This guy an idiot. It's like the stupidest letter. Not only. is it corrupt as hell, it's like stupid. It's also extraordinary for an elected. official to intimidate citizens for. engaging in philanthropic practices that.

will benefit our nation for generations. Oh, so you're going to also cover. yourself up with phil philanthropy. That's what it is. But by the way, isn't. that what Trump and his disgusting. family have always done? Right? It's. philanthropy. It's why do you think. they're banned from doing philanthropy. in some states? Right? Because this is. the type of crap that they do. That's. why I say he's turned the whole. character of the DOJ into the. government, into a bankrupt casino, and. into his criminal enterprises that he's.

been involved in his whole life. And it. goes on to say, "The American people are. entitled to freely associate without. elected officials terrorizing them with. aggressive, harassing government. action." Terrorism. Saying it's terror. when there's actual real terror. You're. saying that that's terrorism, crazy. people, lunatics. He goes on to say, I. therefore write to formally give you. notice of your obligations to pervert. documents, communications, and other.

electronically stored information. You. are obligated to preserve all. potentially relevant evidence related to. your efforts to suppress associational. activities for philanthropic projects. throughout the nation's capital. Failure. to do so may result in sanctions, adverse inference instructions, or other. penalties and may carry significant. legal consequences. This demand applies. to you, your staff, employees, agents, consultants, campaign personnel, and any. other person acting on your behalf or in.

concert with you. Please confirm in. writing by 6:00 p.m. Eastern time, November 18th, that you have received. this letter and have taken steps to. preserve the materials. and this clown. posted on social media because he wants. attention and you know I'm trying to. read okay well what's the hook even here. for the southern district of Texas and. you're saying it involves the nation's c. the ballroom so you go down you read. it's like oh you're talking about the. ballroom and the arch and the reflecting. pool that's what you losers are talking.

about let's bring in Harry Litman from. the talking feds YouTube substack and. podcast Harry I had to read the full. letter because it's really Like it's. like a crazy it's like it's like if you. put an AI make me sound crazy, make me. sound unhinged like and make me sound. like a loser and then threaten the. senator, you know? It's like what are we talking. about here? >> Yeah. I mean it it is gobbledygook and. you do have to go to the footnotes to. understand what he is even saying. And.

here Ben is what he's saying. Trump did. all this private fundraising in order to. at at different points. He he said, "Oh, this won't cost the American taxpayers a. dime." Then it turns out to cost uh the. American taxpayers hundreds of millions. of dollars. Uh and of but of course the. fact that he is doing it in order to. evade congressional oversight or that's. the the notion of trying to keep. Congress from saying, "Well, we're not. going to let you fund this." uh and well.

that's I'll do a workaround I'll use uh. private donors that is itself complete. orthodox down the middle subject for. oversight right of that's exactly what. Congress would do how are you trying to. get around congressional approval and. let's find out a little bit more about. these donors by the way and what they. were promised and what it was about. there is no world in which that's not a. legitimate subject of oversight.

And that is definitive. It's it's that. that establishes the imbecility of what. this I got to go with you, you know, stupid clown is saying because and this. is the same thing uh in the totally. um browbeating letter from the White. House uh council's office. Uh they they. try to talk as if it it's a little bit. like the reprisal prosecutions. we're. going to come after you with federal.

criminal power. A complete abuse of it. They have no no uh possible case to. make. I'll get into that a little bit. more in a second. But that's the you. know prow meaning oh preserve all. documents and the like. The only. possible thing they could be saying is. you don't have a legitimate uh. congressional oversight purpose to look. into the donations uh of these uh. monuments. And I guess again uh there's.

a very broad construction of what could. be a valid uh subject of congressional. oversight. uh the the Trump versus. Maser's case in fact was about whether. Trump's private uh activities could be. the subject of illegitimate oversight. and it and they held that it could and. this is far more um you know down the. middle and possibly abusive. So that's. for starters. This is this is all they.

all they possibly can say is you don't. have a valid legislative purpose and. they're all wet in saying it. But. instead of doing that, they try to do. their, you know, junior high jiujitsu of. saying, "We're going to come after you. for a crime." What would the crime be? And this is this is really sort of uh. pathetic and asinine at the same time. The 18USC 241, that's the the uh. conspiracy to deprive people of civil.

rights. And what would that be? Right of. association. So here here you go. uh in. investigating Trump's uh total use of. private donors to evade congressional. oversight, the uh the the um Congress. would be trying to prevent the. associational rights. Sorry, this is not. like who you can go to the who can go to. Mara Lago. This is about who's get. giving the president poliola to keep him.

out of out of the oversight that the. constitution requires and the idea that. it's a crime and the same thing in the. um separate White House council letter. maybe we'll handle maybe we won't uh. that there's somehow a threat. It really. is a joke. It's a joke on the surface. and it's also a joke of course because. the speech or debate clause, this is. valid legislative activity which. specifically says you can't uh charge.

somebody with crimes if they're doing. legitimate oversight. Now, it's kind of. interesting. I doubt this guy knows it, but Blumenthal is a former US attorney. He knows exactly that they're all wet. They got they they have no tree to be. barking up. And yet, you know, you you. you got to imagine either they're. thinking, "Oh, we're going to scare. congressional overseers. You know, if. they did a a single criminal move,

really, this is itself a violation, an. ethical violation, a violation of DOJ. stuff, they're essentially threatening a. crime and criminal prosecution with. nothing. Not the slightest predicate. I. if there is a file in this guy's office. that says investigation of Blumenthal 18. USC 241 that that would be you know a. complete abuse of process but even so. what you know whatever whatever they. have converting it into we're going to.

somehow come after you with with our big. guns you're bringing your big guns we'll. bring our big guns but their big guns. congressional oversight is exactly what. Congress is supposed to do. And as you. say, after the election, what the people. want them to do, they're big guns. Uh. it's it's a it's less than a water. pistol. There's no possible criminal. jurisdiction here. And it really shows. the sort of bullying ways. And maybe.

it's all all an attempt to uh you know, do propaganda and get the American. people somehow to think Congress when. acting legitimately is is actually. breaking federal law. But it is way uh. out there and if it ever goes before. court, I don't see how, you know, maybe. Blumenthal here says go screw yourself. and they try to enforce it and and and. right away a court would say no way, you. know, but it it's a totally empty. gesture. Uh and just that they're doing.

it is an abuse in and of itself and all. your associates, etc., etc. Th this this. is just you know completely um I could. say this on talk on the mightest mighty. farting in the wind and yet they're um. hoping that somehow to they give an. impression that that Congress is doing. something inappropriate when it is down. the middle stuff that they must do in.

the wake of these last couple years. So, it's both it's it's asinine but also. pernicious if it's really meant to make. people think they've they've got, you. know, there's there's anything but. blanks in the gun. >> I think that's a mixed metaphor. Blanks. in the gun and something else in the. wind. >> You know what I mean? >> Yeah. Look, I mean, you're not sending a letter like this. to, you know, your typical Trump. bullying target, you know, like, you.

know, when, you know, look, getting a. letter like that if you're a Texas law. firm or you're a whatever, you know, and. oh gosh, the United States attorney is. sending me this, you know, sending this. to Sender Blumenthal, like the guy like. the guy's been a US attorney. The guy's. not scared of getting a letter like. this. And if anything, what you're. showing is that you're really scared of. oversight and you're kind of hollering. and letting everybody know that there's. smoke, there's fire, there's an inferno,

and you know, and and it's not going to. deter a co-equal branch. And here's the. thing, when we talk about a co-equal. branch, the president is not supreme to. Congress. They are equal. It may have. felt that way because Maggamike and John. Thun didn't do their job. They are. equal. They there's supposed to be. attention there and Congress is supposed. to assert its prerogatives in the. Constitution and the president can. assert his there are enumerated powers.

in the Constitution that they have and. that's this is the way Congress is. supposed to operate. And so this idea. that Congress talking about oversight. and talking about investigations and. talking about its concerns is somehow a. crime really speaks to the fact that. this is just a lawless regime that. doesn't understand our constitution. And. I think what the voters want to see. right now, want to see truly is not. Steven Miller being promoted to chief of.

staff, >> not Hegsith being protected by. Republicans. America is actually a. fairly forgiving country. Sometimes too. forgiving as we saw with the 2024. elections like dude co Donald Trump like. destroyed the country the first time and. it's like come on. What the country. wanted to see is okay let's work. together. Let's take out this drama. Let's take out this crap. Let's actually. focus on affordability. Let's help the. people and let's get rid of the bad. actors and the bad guys. So get rid of.

Hegsith. Get rid of Miller. Get ridic. I mean, it's bested kind of everybody, but the American people are like, "We. don't want that." And what the Trump. regime is sending as a message is even. though they've lost a massive amount of. power just now, they're going to pretend. that isn't the case. And if that's the. way it's going to be, it's like we can. do this the easy way or the hard way, but we're going to do it the. constitutional way. And the Constitution. says this is the way we can do it. So if.

that's how if you want to do it kicking. and screaming and looking like a loser. and have the whole country observe that. behavior. All right, guess what? There. are what close to 20 seats of Senate. seats or hey 15 up again in 2028. A lot. of Republican seats are up. I mean. there's a world where this is how it. goes. Democrats can gain a super. majority. They can get a super majority. in 2020. They get 67 70 seats 75 seats. potentially in the next this is where. you want to go. This is where you go.

Harry, I'll give you the last. >> Yeah. Well, yeah. First, it's a really. good point. There are 19 open seats and. if the only way they could try to make. trouble is somehow if they have, you. know, Republicans saying the same thing. and that would just talk about, you. know, same old, same old. But this is. starting to look coordinated because the. we also had a letter from the White. House council and I'm just here to tell. uh Fed heads and and the mightest. mighty, it's all the same. You're gonna. hear saber rattling of this crime and. that crime and treason, as Trump is fond.

of saying, cut through it right away. Ask, is there a valid legislative. purpose? And that is widely construed. Of course, there's a valid legislative. purpose in overseeing how he uh did all. his private donations to get around. Congress. Of course, there's a valid. legislative uh purpose in all this kind. of robust investigation. And then the. whole thing collapses. And it but it. really looks like, you know, junior.

highs with with uh kids with water. pistols talking crimes when you realize. that normally what happens when there's. not a valid legislative purpose. We've. seen this Trump officials claim it in. the last several years. You try you. quash the subpoena. Now, they're trying. to say before things have even started, you're we're going to charge you with a. crime cuz we've got the big uh uh you. know, federal criminal code. To be. clear, um you cannot this is this is a.

step of criminal investigation. You. can't do it without a predicate. We've. seen this several times in the Trump. administration. It caused the DC. criminal chief to quit. So this guy in. uh you know thinking he's just sort of. posturing there there's going to be. there's an ethical problem here if. anyone want to make trouble. You just. can't go around pretending you've got. criminal process to apply much less to a. sitting United States senator with.

official oversight responsibilities. So. this going to dry up and go away. But if. they keep it from other sources, you. know, you're you're going to find bar. complaints and the like. And the only. thing is they if they try to delay delay. delay, will this be an actual strategy? So, you have to go into court somehow. and force them and say there's no crime. here. That could be part of it uh of it. too. And that's, you know, always. something to watch with the Trump folks.

But this it is the silliest most asinine. allegation of criminal conduct to emerge. from the administration yet. >> Everybody hit subscribe here. More. importantly, go to the Talking Feds. YouTube channel. That's Harry's channel. Search Talking Feds. Subscribe there. Tell Harry I say hi. Thanks, Harry. >> Thank you, man. >> WTF America is officially out now. My. brothers and I wrote it, but this book. is also about you, the millions who.

refused to back down when it mattered. most. Scan the QR code, click the link. in the description, or find it anywhere. books are sold, and order your copy. today.