Trump faces SUDDEN DEATH of DOJ CASES as SCAM EXPOSED!!!!

We now have entire federal courthouses. tainted by the Trump DOJ grand jury. misconduct we've been covering here on. the Midas Touch Network high-profile. grand jury misconduct cases whether we. talked about James Comey with a. prosecutor who wasn't even allowed to be. in the room whether we talked about the. Broadview 6 where there was something. called vouching taking place where a. federal prosecutor would go to the grand.

jury and basically say, "I'm going to vouch for this guy." When. we saw the transcript, I've never seen. anything like this in my life. "I'm. going to vouch for all of this today. Trust me, I wouldn't bring this to you. on a Friday. Let's get out of here. quickly. I need you to sign your name. These are bad people. Let's get out of. here." Such incredibly. high amounts of grand jury misconduct. that it's almost like unfathomable. If I. put this as a fact pattern on my exams. for law students, they'd be like, "Whoa, this is like the easiest exam, Professor.

that I've ever saw. Come on, you got to. make it a little bit trickier." So, it's. shocking to even see. But now it's not. as I've warned, it's not just the. high-profile cases. We hear about those. more, but this pervades now almost every. case because these Trump prosecutors are. going in front of the grand jury and. it's a combination of maliciousness, arrogance, and incompetence together and. they're just telling the grand jury, "Hey, let's get out of here today. I got. 20 cases. I need 20 indictments super. quick, okay?" And what's happening now.

is you would basically be committing. legal malpractice as a defense lawyer if. you did not use the fact that the. presumption of regularity by the DOJ's. thrown out the window. So, you go, "We. need to look at the grand jury. transcript." And lawyer by lawyer, defense lawyer by defense lawyer, who. gets the grand jury transcript, which. you would normally never get. I mean, this is grand jury secrecy stuff. It's. not supposed to be turned over. But, because the contagion, if you will, is.

so widespread of tainted grand jury. proceedings, criminal defense lawyers. are getting these grand jury. transcripts, and almost every one I. mean, they're getting is showing. vouching and misconduct. I'll give you. an example right here of what went down. Uh there's a case involving COVID-19. fraud. It's called the Loretto Hospital. COVID-19 case. And we just had a federal. judge in the Illinois Chicago courthouse. having to dismiss a very serious case. I'll outline it in a moment. Then,

here's what the judge said. Her name is. Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. She. dismissed the case against two. defendants, and the other two defendants. their cases are hanging limbo. They were. charged before the Trump regime, before. these ones were brought. So, it's. possible some of the indictments are. going to stick, some aren't. We'll see. Um but, here's what the judge said. We. have cases in this building that are in. turmoil, and judges are trying to figure. out what in the world is going on. She. lit into the US attorney in Chicago,

Andrew Butros. Again, the same person. who was overseeing the Broadview 6. prosecution, which was tainted by grand. jury misconduct. And the federal judge. said this is a dysfunctional office, and. you're basically screwing up every case. Just to explain to you the level of. seriousness of this case. So, it. involves a number of defendants who were. involved in COVID-19 allegations of. COVID-19 testing fraud. And the.

allegations are a massive scheme to. defraud the government via the Health. Resources and Service Administration's. program for uninsured patients by. submitting fake claims for COVID-19. tests that were never performed. And. it's alleged that these defendants. accessed personal data from over 150,000. Loretto patients and used it to support. fraudulent billing for COVID tests that. were never actually done and that this. doctor group allegedly submitted roughly.

894. to 900 million dollars in false COVID-19. testing claims between June 2021 and. March 2022 when program funds ran out. and the government paid a ton of money. and apparently the allegations are these. tests were never done using stolen. patient info to bill for tests for. uninsured patients. And so that's the allegation, very very. serious stuff. Back in 2025, late 2025,

there was an. an indictment that was unsealed. This. case has been proceeding and you never. would have thought should I look at the. grand jury transcripts here? Did they. vouch? Did they engage in this. misconduct? But now the fallout from the. Broadview case, it reminds me of uh. when I used to be a civil litigator, there would be certain cops who would be. on like a like a Brady list. Do they. call it they would be on this list where. they were involved in habitual.

offending. So you would know which cop. would do it over and over again. There. are prosecutors now who are now being. known for all of their cases basically. having tainted grand jury proceedings. And so that's what happened here that. this entire office is now known for. going into grand juries and either lying. to them or vouching or engaging in. heinous conduct. So one by one, criminal defense lawyers, let me get that grand jury transcript.

And the judges are like, "Okay, you. know, normally we would say no, but the. presumption of regularity is out the. window and we know that every time we. see one of these grand jury transcripts, there's a misconduct that's that's. taking place." I want to bring in Harry. Litman from Talking Fed. Harry, you. know, some a lot of these defendants are. now off. Their cases got dismissed and. everyone's entitled to a presumption of. innocence. Let me be very clear, you. know, about that. But, these cases are. now dismissed for procedural reasons,

and these are people being accused of. very serious things. And when you talk. about law and order, right? Donald. Trump's. performative. heinous going after political enemy. prosecutions. have now opened up Pandora's Box to show. all these other cases have been tainted. by the same type of misconduct. And so. now, as you and I predicted, all these prosecutions are getting.

dismissed. What do you make of it all? >> First, let me just say it's it's a. tragedy. You know, I've tried to make the point. repeatedly as this misconduct comes out. that the real victims are the public. because it's a important public safety. function of the DOJ that now they're not. able to do in individual cases. But, man. oh man, talk about a uh. total degradation in a specific. district. The Northern District of.

Illinois, Ben, as you know, is. one of the most important five in the in. the country, maybe. This is a big one. And you have a whole bench here that. that um apparently is just basically. lost faith in the prosecutors before. them. Everyone's entitled to a. presumption of innocence, and yet uh in. a well-functioning Department of. Justice, uh the conviction rate is, as you know, having been a defense lawyer, very very.

high. That's because prosecutors choose. the cases carefully, bring the ones they. can prove, bring the ones where the. people have done the offenses, and you. come to understand that as a judge, and. that's the sort of tailwind that it's. great for a prosecutor, but it's also. great for the public because, you know, even though some jaundiced people don't. believe it, uh at least in the previous. Department of Justice, that's what. people were doing. They were They were. working with integrity. So, now the word.

goes out, and the whole thing is just. You have You have uh prosecutors coming. in, and judges having an almost. reflexive skepticism toward them. The. very opposite uh you mentioned. So, Boutros here, uh you're totally that. That's the US attorney. Now, he's a guy. who, unlike some of these sort of. political appointees, he was an AUSA in. that office for several years, I think.

five or six. It's a little bit of a Todd. Blanche character that way. He knows the. difference should know the difference. But in the Broadview 6 case that you. mentioned, they had this horrific uh. misconduct in the grand jury, and. Boutros comes out and apologizes to the. court, but then proceeds to um trash the. the defendants anyway, some of whose. cases were being dismissed, and the. judge said, "You're snatching uh defeat. from the jaws of victory here. That you.

know, that it's irrelevant how bad they. are. You That doesn't mean with bad. defendants, you can violate grand jury. rules." And now you have in this case a. different judge saying, "Calling him out personally and tagging. uh a perception that they ascribe to him. that the office is dysfunctional.". You know, they They are the most repeat. players, uh the federal judges and the. US attorney's office. They're They're in. front of each other every day. And if uh.

all the judges, and that's a pretty big. court, I think at least a dozen in. Northern District of Illinois who just. when a when a prosecutor shows up, they. think, "Ugh, I don't know if I'm going to be getting. it straight here. And what am I. expecting from those guys and the office. is dysfunctional?" I mean, that's that. is a, you know, something that harms. even in a normal bank robbery case and. and something that has no political uh.

violence, but they're just thinking, "These guys are a mess. They're. politicized mess, but also they're. feckless and they can't even do It is so. basic the kind of, as you were saying, um grand jury misconduct that they're. that they're doing and what does it say. of an entire office that it could. happen? That's the question judges are. now asking and thinking, "You know, these guys, they're they are not uh. there's nothing special about them and. no reason to think that they've got.

they've done it right or they're doing. their jobs or even if the people are. good and no reason to think they're. going to adhere to the constitutional. uh. guidelines. I don't have a presumption. of regularity anymore." That is like a. body blow and again, the real impact is. to the public because the, you know, it. means the cases that with there was a. presumption of regularity would be. accepted because people are in fact. honest and acting in good faith. They.

used to be Department of Justice. Now. those people can't necessarily get. convicted and that's that's a cost borne. by the public. >> Everybody make sure you subscribe to. Harry Litman's YouTube channel. It's. called. Talking Feds, where I get a lot of my legal news from. So, once this video's over, just search. Talking Feds, tell Harry I say hi in the. comments and subscribe here as well. Thanks, Harry. >> Thank you, Ben. We always love seeing.

those comments. >> New Minus merch, head to. store.midastouch.com [music]. today and get yourself the best. pro-democracy gear and show your. support. That's store.midastouch.com. [music].