🚨 Trump Cabinet CRASHES AND BURNS under CROSS-EXAM!!!

Donald Trump's top cabinet members just. collapsed under intense. cross-examination on Capitol Hill. You. had two of Donald Trump's top cabinet. members collapsing under. cross-examination. Treasury Secretary. Scott Bessent testified before the. United States Senate and Secretary of. State Marco Rubio testified before the. House of Representatives. He testified. before the United States Senate. yesterday. Let me show you what went. down. First, let me show you Treasury. Secretary Scott Bessent getting. cross-examined by Democratic Senator.

Lujan about the settlement agreement. that the Treasury Department entered. into with Donald Trump to waive all. claims and investigations into Donald. Trump, Trump's family, and Trump. Organization for tax evasion. Here, play. this clip. >> would know that I'm unable to answer. those questions and they should be. referred to Attorney General Blanche. >> what about the addendum to this. agreement? Are you familiar with what. the addendum is? >> Uh, I'm not sure what you're referring. >> Are you familiar with this giveaway from. the IRS that says President Trump and.

anyone that knows him or does business. with him or part of a business, they get. off scot-free? Are you aware of this? >> I I Again, I refer you to Attorney. General Blanche. >> Are you Attorney General Blanche's. client? >> The. IRS and Treasury are a client of the. Department of Justice. >> So, is that a nice way of saying yes? You're a client. He's He's your lawyer. >> I. He represent. >> You're the secret Are you the Secretary. of Treasury? Yes is the answer.

>> The Department of Justice. >> The I I Scott Bessent, let me ask you. this question, sir. Are you the. Secretary. >> capacity, Todd Blanche is not my. attorney. >> Correct, sir. >> The as Are you. >> I. For for the US Treasury. >> Scott, let me ask you this way. Scott, are you the Secretary of Treasury for. the United States government? >> Yes. >> Appreciate that. The Department of. Justice represents the IRS and the. Department of Treasury in this lawsuit, correct? >> Correct. >> Are you aware of this addendum? Did Did.

You're telling me DOJ gave the president. this without you knowing about it? >> I Again, they settled on our behalf. >> That's not how the law works, sir. I'm. not a lawyer, but you have a bunch of. them behind you. You should see the. faces they're making at me behind you. They're all scowling at me back over. here. >> Well, I I think that's a different. reason, sir. >> Well, for whatever it is, they're doing. it. Um. >> Now going to the House of. Representatives, let me show you. Congressman Lieu cross-examining Marco. Rubio about Donald Trump's declining. cognitive health and the fact that.

Donald Trump keeps falling asleep during. public meetings during the day. And. you'll see, in my opinion, Marco Rubio. perjure himself by saying that he's. never seen Donald Trump fall asleep when. you actually see a video of Donald Trump. falling asleep right next to Rubio. Let's play this clip. >> Senator Rubio, have you been at more. than one meeting. where President Trump has fallen asleep? >> That's false. That's false. I've never seen him fall. asleep. On the contrary, the guy doesn't.

sleep, which is a big problem cuz he. calls me at 2:00 in the morning, he. calls me at 5:00 in the morning. And you. know, I like to sleep a little bit, maybe not 12 hours or but at least six. So, he works The other day he was at the. Oval Office until 12:30 p.m. I 12:30. a.m. I don't know what you're talking. about. >> Senator Rubio. I'm going to show you in a moment a. video that shows you just lied to. Congress. >> Oh, okay. >> So, this is a video of a cabinet meeting. literally from last month. where Donald Trump is sleeping while you. are talking. Please show this video.

>> coalition of countries that line up. behind the peace deal, behind the board. of peace. And it's still an Every day is. a challenge, but it's been driven. personally by the president. It's the. reason why I'm we're involved in this. whole Ukraine-Russia conflict. That's. not our war. It's not the president's. war. This war started It never would. have happened if you'd been president. But this war is going on, and the. president is trying to end it. >> You are literally talking about issues. of war and peace and Donald Trump is. sleeping right next to you. >> No, he's not. >> If Donald Trump cannot stay awake at.

these important meetings where the. cameras are rolling, imagine what he's like when the cameras. are not there. So, I'm going to ask you, have you been at classified meetings. where Donald Trump has fallen asleep or. had trouble staying awake? >> I've never been at any meeting where And. the things you're showing me now, he was. not falling asleep. And. >> And I think he's so you're lying again. You're lying consistently to Congress. You're lying to Congress, Secretary. Rubio. So, I'm going to show you another. video in a moment. The president's.

inability The president's inability to. stay awake on the job has caused other. countries. to perceive him differently. They mock. him. They see he is weak and he is. feeble. >> Now, back to the United States Senate. where you had Senator Warnock. cross-examining Besant about what grade. would you give the economy right now and. Besant says A++++. Here, play this clip. >> Last month, I asked the president's nominee to lead.

the Federal Reserve what I thought. was a simple question, but he tried to. dodge it. His answer was cute. I'm not sure the. American people who are struggling were. were laughing. So, I'll ask you the same. question to see if I can get a clear. answer. President Trump has said that. his grade of the economy, his words, is. a quote plus plus plus plus plus. He said this before he sent energy and.

gas prices soaring. with his illegal war in Iran, a war that's costing taxpayers billions. of dollars, a billion dollars or more. per day, turbo turbocharging inflation. So, I'll ask the Secretary of the Treasury. the same question given all of the. challenges. facing ordinary Americans, our political differences aside, what grade would you give the US economy. right now? >> Uh. which which challenges other than.

temporarily elevated prices would you. identify, Senator? >> I'm asking you what grade would you give. the economy? >> I I think we have the makings of one of. the strongest economies in history. We've We've had 2.6% growth. >> So, you. >> core inflation had dropped. Food. inflation since President Trump began as. much much as you all they want to. disagree. >> it. >> is 2.5%. >> So, you agree with the president. You. would You would give the economy a. a a plus plus plus plus plus. >> I I think we have all.

>> From where you sit. >> I think we have all the makings for a. very strong economy. I think that we. have uh. temporary. elevated prices that will come back. down. >> I I I got it. So, you're telling. Americans it's it's not so bad. Americans give the Trump economy. a failing grade. You and I can disagree, but this is not. about us. They give the economy a failing grade. because they can't afford anything. Folks back at home in Georgia, whom I.

represent, are struggling. Let me finish. >> I'll I'll. >> to just make their lives work. And they. know President Trump's Iran war and the. tariff taxes. are only making things worse. Talk to. farmers in Georgia. >> There's more from the cross-examination. of Rubio by Ted Lieu. Ted Lieu basically. calls out Rubio for participating in. North Korea-style cabinet meetings with. Donald Trump. Let's play it. >> So, Senator Rubio, instead of holding. North Korean-style cabinet meetings.

where everyone goes around the room. kissing Donald Trump's ass, I'm going to. ask you to come clean with American. people and the White House as well. There's something wrong with Donald. Trump's health or cognitive abilities. There's a reason he keeps going to the. hospital and they keep giving him. cognitive tests. We have not seen the. president in eight days. The American. people deserve the truth. I yield back. >> Um I don't even know how to respond to. that other than to tell you that it's. absurd and ridiculous and I can't.

believe we're in a Foreign Affairs. Committee meeting in front of the House. at an important time in American foreign. policy. >> Just keep lying so people will just keep. lying. >> so-called supposedly someone who thinks. he's a medical expert when he's not. The. truth of the matter is we had a. cognitively impaired president in office. a few years ago. That's a cognitively. impaired president, but I don't like to. talk about that because it weakens. America. This president we have, this is. a guy that literally doesn't sleep. He. works day and night, long hours every. single day. I don't know if you haven't. seen him in eight days. I saw him. yesterday. I didn't see him today, but. yesterday cuz I was in Congress the day.

before. I talked to him at all hours of. the day and night. He works inhumane. hours. Okay, I've been on I've been on foreign. trips with the president that he doesn't. sleep in the whole flight. And everyone. else is sleeping on the plane and he's, you know, wandering the hallways looking. for someone to wake up and talk to. The. people are So I don't know what you're. referring to, but he has an incredible. amount of energy. I'm just telling you. you may not like his policies. You may not like his policies. You may. not like the decisions he's made, but I. assure you this is not a president that. sleeps or is cognitively impaired in any. way, shape or form. And in fact is is.

incredibly active, much more so in many. cases than much younger people that are. around him. Those are facts. I see it. every day. You're not going to agree cuz. you have another narrative that you want. to push, but those are the facts. >> I'll just show you three videos of him. sleeping, sir. >> Representative Vice is recognized. >> Now back to the Senate where Democratic. Senator Cortez Masto was cross-examining. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about. whether 400,000 other taxpayers who were. part of the data breach from 2019 who. had their tax returns leaked during.

Trump's first administration, do they. all get the same immunity from. tax evasion investigations and charges. the way Donald Trump does? Here, play. this clip. >> You are the acting IRS commissioner, correct? >> That is incorrect. >> your position right now with the IRS? >> My term expired. >> So, you have no position with the IRS. whatsoever? >> The The IRS is a bureau that reports to. Treasury. When there is no commissioner, those duties float up to me. >> All right. So, um there's no interaction.

that you have right now or. responsibility over the IRS other than. the commissioner's there. The. commissioner has free reign and you. don't have any authority to to stop. anything? >> No, there there is no commissioner, so I. assume those duties. >> So, there is no commissioner, so you're. acting commissioner. >> No, that's incorrect. >> Okay, so for the purposes of the public, let's get it straight so the public. knows your involvement. There is no. commissioner. There's somebody that is acting. >> I had pre No, I had previously been the. acting commissioner. Senator Warren, who's likes to send me a lot of letters,

was kind enough to send me a letter. >> Yeah, I'm just trying to see how your. role with the IRS. For the For the. purposes of public and transparency, what is your role currently with the IRS. and your authority? >> The I am performing the duties of the. commissioner. >> Oh, oh, so you are. Okay, got it. So, let me ask you this because you talked. about not only Donald Trump and his. family, but there were 400,000. taxpayers' information that was also. leaked um by Mr. Littlejohn, the. contractor working for the IRS. Um do. you intend to give them the same.

immunity as President Trump and his. family received? >> Uh I Again, uh you were not here at the. beginning. I had a statement that I read. to Chairman Quit Crapo that I am unable. to provide any additional details. >> not part of the litigation. >> due to litigation. >> That That's The 400,000 taxpayers aren't. part of the litigation? You You have said there were 400,000. taxpayers' information that was also. leaked. They're not part of that. litigation. Do you intend to give them. the same immunity that you gave Donald. Trump and his family and corporations.

that were part of the litigation. >> Senator, you may have missed the first part of. this, but Treasury does not give any of. that. We are represented by the Justice. Department. >> That's right. You're the acting. commissioner. As acting commissioner, you had said earlier you had concerns. about those 400,000 taxpayers whose. documents were leaked by independent. contractor with the IRS. If you have. concerns about those 400,000, do you. intend as acting or your whatever role.

it is you have as the IRS commissioner, do you intend to give them the same type. of treatment? >> We we will follow the instructions and. the settlement that by. >> That was not part of the settlement. That was not part of the settlement. So, clearly. Let me just say that was not part of the. settlement. It's been very clear you're. dodging this and you're trying to use it. as an excuse. It's just outrageous on. behalf of the American public. >> And that I will follow the law as an. excuse, Senator? >> When you were.

>> More from the cross-examination of Rubio. right here, you had Congresswoman Jacobs. cross-examining Rubio about who won the. war and whether the war has been won and. whether the United States is declaring. victory. Let me show you what went down. Play this clip. >> in Iran. Yesterday in your Senate testimony, you. told Senator Booker that the war in Iran. is over. This is news to me. It's also. news to my 2,500 constituents, Marines, San Diego Marines in the Middle East off.

the coast of Iran, the other of my. constituents who are deployed there, and. the thousands more of my constituents. who have 48-hour deployment notices. whose families are still very concerned. But okay, I will take you at your word. If the war is over, I have a simple. question. Who won? >> First of all, Epic Fury is over, which. is what you would consider the war. That. that operation is over. >> agree it's a war then? >> No, I could Those are hostilities. They. called it a war. I'm just responding to. the Senator from Florida. >> Mr. Secretary, you can you can change.

the name of the operation. It doesn't. change the fact that the strait is still. closed and my service members and all of. our service members are still in harm's. way. The war is not over, but I'm I'm. agreeing with you. Okay, fine. We're. taking you at your word. The war is. over. Who won? >> Well, first of all, you're not taking me. at my word. It's a fact. We're no longer. conducting sustained strikes inside of. Iran to degrade their military because. Epic Fury is over. The second point is. on the question of who won, I can tell. you this, uh we defined victory We. defined victory as destroying their. defense industrial base, significantly.

reducing the number of missile launchers. that they possess, significantly. reducing their stock pile of drones, and. we achieved all of those in addition to. destroying what they had left of an air. force and wiping out their entire. conventional navy. Those are all gone. So, I consider that victory and we did. too, and that was the purpose. >> the way, here are photos of Rubio's. shoes, these Florsheim shoes. Donald. Trump buys these shoes for Rubio and he. buys them two or three sizes too big and. he makes Rubio wear them and prance. around in front of him wearing these. Florsheim shoes. That's what Trump does.

with a lot of his cabinet members. He. makes them wear shoes that are two or. three sizes too big so that they look. odd, I don't know. Uh Marco Rubio then. is responding to a question about. Greenland and whether Greenland is part. of Denmark and Rubio says, "For now.". More threats from the Secretary of State. who's supposed to be America's top. diplomat about taking over a NATO allies. country and stealing their sovereignty. You'll play this clip. >> that the UK had suffered more. >> More per capita. >> Okay, got you.

>> And I assume you're aware that Greenland. is indeed part of Denmark. >> For now. >> Okay. Well, >> More cross-examination of Rubio, this. time from Congressman Stanton, who. cross-examines Rubio about the conflict. of interest of Witkoff and Kushner to. participate in any negotiations with. Iran or any country for that matter, since they are heavily involved in. Middle East investments, and they. haven't been appointed to these roles. And why would the Secretary of State.

delegate his role as chief negotiator to. freaking Jared Kushner and Witkoff, who. are getting tons of money from Middle. East countries personally? Here, play. this clip. >> In the spring, another company chaired. by Sheikh Tahnoon, MGX, deposited $2. billion. in World Liberty Financial's stablecoin, the single largest investment in the. crypto company ever. Weeks later, the chip deal was announced. despite. national security concerns. Senator.

Rubio, do you believe that Mr. Witkoff has an. unacceptable conflict of interest? >> I've never seen any evidence that he's. made any decisions or advocated for any. position that stirs personal benefit. On. the contrary, um and again, I can't speak to all the. things you're saying now cuz I that's. not he he Mr. Witkoff is an employee of. the White House, and he undergoes the. ethics vetting and the procedures for. disclosure that uh that are appropriate. to them, not to the State Department. But I would just add I want to be fair, okay? I've never seen the guy ever say. anything to me that makes me think this. is personal rather than um the only.

thing he's ever done is spend his own. money. >> Yeah. >> I know he has spent his own money at. great personal expense to fly around the. world on his own airplane, not on the. government bill. He has you know, he has. uh done it, but everything out of his. own pocket. >> concerned about the appearance of a. conflict of interest in Mr. Witkoff? >> I've never seen anything that leads me. to have that concern. You know, again, you've cited a bunch of things. I'm just. not aware of those cuz and but I'm just. telling you my personal interactions. with Mr. Witkoff are of a person who. just thinks he's serving the country and. is happy to do so, not out of any.

personal gain, but because he wants to. serve the country. >> As Secretary of State, who's in charge. of the foreign affairs of the United. States, have you spoken to President. Trump about any concerns about conflict. of interest with Mr. Witkoff? >> I haven't had to. I've not seen any. >> Let's talk about Jared Kushner. His. private equity firm, Affinity Partners, has raised more than $6 billion since it. was founded in 2021 including 1.2. billion just over the last year. Mr. Secretary, are you aware of how much of. that 6 billion has been raised from. foreign nationals? >> I don't know anything about it. >> The answer is 99%.

These include sovereign wealth funds. operated by Saudi Arabia, UAE and Qatar. The Saudi sovereign wealth fund is the. largest investor in Affinity Partners. In fact, Crown Prince Mohammed bin. Salman personally recommended that Saudi. Arabia invest in Affinity Partners. The. Crown Prince has also personally urged. President Trump in multiple phone calls. to continue the ongoing war of choice in. Iran. Let's put it another way. The man who bankrolled Kushner's. business venture is the same man who is.

lobbying for the war Kushner is tasked. with ending. Mr. Secretary, same. question, are you concerned about any. conflict of interest by Jared Kushner, the president's son-in-law? >> Again, in Jared's case, Jared is a. private citizen who's been advising and. participating in this voluntarily. He's. not compensated for it or in any way, but I've never seen either from either. Steve or Jared any on the contrary. All. I've ever seen them do is put tremendous. amount of time and energy into trying to. solve problems. Like the amount of time. they put into Gaza and the board of. peace and all of that process. I I think.

that I I think I believe he's done it. out of the kindness and goodness of. their heart. They think they're serving. the country. >> The goodness of their heart. Mr. Secretary, what Jared Kushner said. >> Then you go back to the United States. Senate where you had Senator Smith. cross-examining Treasury Secretary. Bessent about the struggle that farmers. are experiencing and then Treasury. Secretary Bessent says, "Well, I'm a. farmer also. I own a farm, so I could. relate to the farmers." No, you're a. billionaire Epstein class individuals. who you are and you're killing the.

farmers right now. You're hurting. Americans so much and your level of. arrogance is absolutely disgusting. Here, play this clip. >> right now. >> Senator, do you believe that can have a. nuclear weapon? >> Mr. Secretary, this is my time to ask. you the questions. How do you respond to. Minnesota farmers. >> the question. >> who cannot afford the fertilizer they. need. >> Uh well, the uh I I think if you were to. look in the dictionary, the definition. of a farmer is someone who owns a farm.

and farms the land. And so, as a former. farmer, I will tell you that and maybe. you know that 75% of the fertilizer had. already been purchased this year. >> That is not what my farmers in Minnesota. are telling me, sir. They are telling me. that they cannot afford their fertilizer. and they know the reason why. They know. the reason why. >> There is no doubt that that farmers have. been struggling, but much of that that. there was a record crop last year, Senator. And what do record crops lead. to?

>> What my farmers are telling me. >> So, I'm sure I will take that back. I. will take that back to my producers in. Minnesota that they have a. um. they have somebody in the Department of. Treasury, a former farmer, who is. feeling their pain. Thank you. >> Senator Lankford. >> Going back uh to the cross-exam by. Senator Lujan, really impressive. cross-exam here. Let's play it. This. little giveaway to President Trump and.

his family. gets them off scot-free. Does every. American. become part of this addendum? If If. someone didn't pay their taxes or. violated tax law or did bad things, are. they told, "Can't prosecute. You're. good. Everyone going back to the date of. this" or is this only for President. Trump and his affiliates? >> Senator, do you have specific knowledge. of President Trump's being audited? >> Sir, I I have specific knowledge of this. addendum that you don't know a damn. thing about that is for the Department.

of Treasury that your lawyer at the. Department of Justice. signed you up for. The reason I'm asking this question is. because. President Trump's sons. signed a deal, as you know, with the. World Liberty Financial with a bunch of. folks you sanctioned. And now, as part of this, there's an addendum. that says President Trump and his kids. and anyone affiliated with him, I don't.

know if it's current wives, former. wives, people that just did transactions with. him, they're off. scot-free. That you know, that has a new. way a new ring to it, this thing. Scot-free because the Department of. Treasury and the IRS is not going to go. after him, sir. This is wrong. This is. lawless. I hope our colleagues will look. at this addendum, if I could offer this. into the record, Mr. Chairman, for those. that don't haven't seen it yet. >> Without objection. >> [clears throat]. >> Come on, man. There's a better way of doing this, sir. That's all we're saying here. So, look,

I appreciate it if you don't want to. talk about a lawsuit. That that's your. prerogative to answer that way. But to say that you, as a client, a. Secretary of the US Treasury, does not. know what the Department of Justice is. giving away to people, come on, man. That that's just not on. the up and up, sir. I sir, I hope we can. >> You don't understand the way the the. protocol works and we they. we receive advice and accept their. settlement. >> You're telling me as a Secretary of US. Treasury, you don't know that the. President of the United States, who I.

think you work for, >> [clears throat]. >> got a sweetheart deal from the. Department of Justice, who's your. lawyer? YOU'RE IN LINE FOR THE. PRESIDENCY, SCOTT. >> I I do know that the President of the. United States and 400 many of his. employees had the largest tax leak in. history and. >> I know here's his filings, sir, of all. the insider trading, right here. >> Do do you want to apologize on behalf of. the American government, sir? >> Scott, you should apologize to the. American people for fleecing them and. giving this away to Donald Trump, man. That's what you should do. >> I Well, we we can agree to disagree.

>> Senator Warnock. >> That we'll agree on. >> Then you had Senator Warren. cross-examining Treasury Secretary. Bessent. Let me show you what went down. >> And the value of virtually every one of. those stocks that the president traded. in is directly affected by President. Trump's official actions. So, Secretary. Bessent, you and I agree that it is a. conflict of interest for members of. Congress to trade stocks. Do you also.

agree that it's conflict of interest for. President Trump to trade stocks? >> Well, couple of things, Senator. One, President Trump is not sitting in the. Oval Office engaging in a high-frequency. trading strategy. Clearly, he Clearly, clearly he had an outside manager who. was doing that. And they So, and I I. think it's incumbent upon both houses. they of Congress to get their house in. order before you move to the. administrative branch. >> You think it's okay for the president of. the United States.

Because let's be clear. You are a Wall. Street guy, so you know better. The. investments that the Trump that. President Trump has made are not blind. President Trump literally signed the. 113-page. document publicly listing all of his. individual stock trades at the same time. that he is making decisions affecting. those stocks. So, you're going to sit. here with straight face and say it's not. a conflict of interest for the president. of the United States to do that? >> I I'm I'm going to say this body needs.

to get its house in order first. >> How about we get the White House in. order at the same time? >> I would encourage you to do that. We I. >> I don't trade in individual stocks. I. don't own any individual stocks. My. house is in order. Thank you. >> Senator you're very gracious. Others Others on this committee can't. say that, Senator. >> Let's. >> a cross-examination here by Senator. Hassan cross-examining Bessent. Let Let. you what took place. >> You speak with the president regularly. Are you trying to tell him the truth.

about how much costs have increased for. the American people? >> Uh well, Senator, I'm going to have to. disagree with you on some of that. because I have groceries are going down. And to be clear, since President Trump. took office, food pri- food food prices, or as many people like to call them. groceries, food at home in the. statistical data, is up 2.5%. >> last time you were in a grocery store? Because my husband and I were just in. one. And look, the average Granite. Stater. >> But that's not what the data says, Senator. >> is paid Let me be clear. The average. Granite Stater has paid $3,000 more.

since Donald Trump took office for basic. goods and services. Meanwhile, the. country lost 100,000 manufacturing jobs. in 2025. So, do you tell the president. this information or not? >> The again, Senator, the except for. inflation, which is, I believe, going to. be a short-term blip, the economic data. is very strong. The jobs data has been. very strong. The manufacturing ISM has. been very strong. >> No, actually, that's incorrect. So,

let's move on because what's clear to me. >> Which part was incorrect, Senator? >> No, what what is very clear to me is. that neither you nor the president nor. this administration are willing to. acknowledge how much more people are. paying at the gas pump, at the grocery. store, in utilities, for healthcare, for. all aspects of American life. Nor have. you acknowledged the number of. manufacturing jobs that were lost in. 2025. >> More from that exchange. Let's play it. >> Now, let's move on to another issue. >> Americans are paying 2.5% more for.

groceries since President Trump took. office, which is half the annual amount. under. Biden administration. >> talking about Biden. We're talking about. this administration and its promise to. lower costs and the fact that this. president says he doesn't care. Now, let's go on to. Mr. Mr. Secretary, my time is limited. I'd like to reclaim a little bit of my. time cuz I have one more question. The. administration has. >> And more from that exchange where you. have Bessent saying that the ballroom is. so needed right now for national.

security purposes. Let's play this clip. >> The administration has claimed that its. top priority is lowering costs for. American families, but the president. instead continues to pursue vanity. projects at a significant cost to. taxpayers. He requested a billion. dollars for the White House ballroom, spent $45 million on military birthday. parade, proposed a $100 million arch at. Memorial Circle, and now Treasury is. planning production of a $250 bill with. his face on it. Mr. Secretary, how does.

the president's requested billion-dollar. ballroom or all of these other vanity. products lower costs for American. families or help constrain spending? >> Uh. Senator, first First of all, you're. incorrect. There is no cost to the. American people. I- If there is a new. bill. for the ballroom, the decor part of the ballroom is. privately funded, and everything that. you were talking about. >> The president requested a billion. dollars for the White House ballroom in. our budget. He has spent 45 million on a.

military birthday parade. So, >> That That all That Look, it goes on. outside my office every day. I've. watched it progress, and it is national. security matters that the billion. dollars is for. >> ridiculous, and I think you know it. I'll yield back my time. Thank you, Mr. Chair. >> We'll keep you posted with more. throughout the day, but um pretty. compelling. uh testimony and or cross-examination. and pretty compelling testimony in terms. of demonstrating that they're perjuring. themselves and that they are.

as despicable as we think they are, if. not worse. Well, hit subscribe. Let me know what. you think. Let's get to 7 million. subscribers. Thanks, everybody. Want to. stay plugged in? Become a subscriber to. our Substack at [music] midasplus.com. You'll get daily recaps from Ron. Filipkowski, ad-free episodes of our. podcast, [music] and more exclusive. content only available at midasplus.com.