Trump BEGS SCOTUS For HELP after they RULE AGAINST HIM!!!
What do you do when you're Donald Trump. and the Supreme Court rules against you. on a case where a federal jury found you. liable of defamation and civil sexual. assault and the uh Supreme Court says. we're not going to take up the case on. an appeal. Go away. What do you do if. you're Donald Trump? Just ask him again. Ask for a mulligan. Ask for a doover. Supreme Court. I know you ruled against. my petition for Cert and you're saying. you're not going to hear the case, but. uh I don't trust you. I don't believe. you. Can I do a doover? Can I try again?
Because meanwhile, the money that Donald. Trump owes his sexual assault victim as. adjudicated by a civil jury in a civil. federal case, Eene Carol, that money was. segregated and put aside. It was a $5. million verdict or so. Donald Trump lost. a unanimous jury, as you all recall, found against Donald Trump in that case. Donald Trump he appealed that like seven. like seven different times when you. consider all of these appeals before the. Supreme Court recently said no go away.
and then Donald Trump said I'm not going. to accept no I'm not going to I'm going. to petition you for a rehearing and then. I'm going to try to use that petition. for rehearing to now demand that the. lower courts stay the money being. dispersed to Eugene Carol on a case she. won a long time ago because I'm claiming. that I'm doing a petition for rehearing. and I'm also going to claim that I'm.
bringing in a lot of new lawyers on the. case and I'm bringing in some hired guns. over at the firm of Sullivan and. Cromwell and other big time lawyers and. they need to now catch up and that's. going to take them months maybe years to. catch up. So you can't give the money to. each and Carol. And also you can't give. her the money cuz she says she wants to. donate the money to charity. Could you. imagine? She wants to give my money to. charity. That'll be causing me. irreparable. I will be irreparably. harmed if the money that was awarded to.
her because a civil jury found sexual. assault and defamation. If she gives. that to charity. So to remind you of. these rapid developments that have. happened recently, you have the Supreme. Court ruling against Donald Trump by. ruling against rejecting his petition to. even hear it. They're like, "This is not. a case that the Supreme Court takes.". Then Donald Trump rushes back to the. district court where he's lost and has. like demanded numerous times that the. case be stayed and overturned and all of.
these things. The federal judge, Judge. Kaplan, in a scathing order says, "No, go away." In the last analysis, defendant has been stalling this case. for years. A jury unanimously concluded. he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff. and awarded her damages accordingly. The. judgment on that verdict has been upheld. on appeal. Enbach hearing has been. denied. The Supreme Court has denied. cert without dissent. It is time for him.
to do equity and pay the judgment. And. then the judge pre in the order before. that on page one says more than three. years ago a jury returned a verdict. against defendant for $5 million for. sexual abuse and defamation. The. judgment was appealed. Defendant posted. a $5.55. million to the court to secure payment. of the judgment plus interest pursuant. to stipulation and court order. In due. course, the judgment was affirmed on.
appeal. The court of appeals denied. rehearing and bonk and the Supreme Court. on June 29th denied without disscent. defendants petitioned for a rid of cert. Plaintiff is now moving forward. dispersement of funds. Egene Carol. saying, "All right, I won. I want the. funds." Um, judgment plus postjudgment. interest. defendant resisted contending. contending the payment must or in any. event should be stayed against the. possibility that the Supreme Court might. change its mind grant his petition for.
reharing of certari. losing there Donald Trump then goes back. to the second circuit court of appeals. and in a one-s sentence order the second. circuit denies Trump's emergency motion. for an administrative stay of judge. Kaplan's order which released that money. to Eugene Carol and then Donald Trump. now is planning a petition. for rehearing for the denial for the. there's no hearing. The Supreme Court.
doesn't want to hear it. It's not a case. where they hear on search soari that. they don't want to take this case. But. Trump is petitioning them for. re-hearing. And so Trump is also using. this firm called Sullivan and Cromwell. And then there's a whole story there for. those who don't know the inner workings. of, you know, big law as it's called, Sullivan and Cromwell, one of the kind. of biggest law firms out there. And it. once had, and I say once had because. there's a civil war going on over this. case, some of the most prestigious the.
most prestigious reputation. Sullivan. and Cromwell, exalted, think about like. a Harvard or Yale of big law firms, the. top partners. um they started. representing Donald Trump in a lot of. cases, but the chair of Sullivan and. Cromwell told the partners who were very. uneasy about this firm leaning in and. representing Donald Trump in all these. cases, "Don't worry, we're going to. represent him on these cases, more of. the businessy cases. We're a business. firm, but we will not represent him on.
any appeals regarding sexual abuse and. sexual assault civil cases, any of his. other kind of frivolous litigations that. he files." You know, there were a lot of. women partners and whether a woman or. not woman, just partners in general who. did not like the way Trump abuses the. legal system, not to mention the. underlying abuse cases. And so the kind. of agreement in this firm was, "All. right, we'll do just the business cases. and that's how we'll justify." Well,
then they leaned in on these cases and. now all these other partners are like, "What the heck? we no you're sullying. the name of Sullivan and Cromwell and. the reputation of why we even are at. this firm and so now there's talk is. there going to be a mass exodus out of. Sullivan right now cuz people are. absolutely pissed that they're now. associated with cases like this and a. and not just the underlying case which. is sick and serious but now frivolously. petitioning the Supreme Court undermines.
just what Sullivan claims it stands for. for its clients. I guess nothing. anymore. Let's bring in Harry Litman. from Talking Fed's YouTube channel, podcast, and Substack. Harry, I know. you've got a lot to say on this. I mean, you know these people. You know the. Sullivan lawyers. You know, you've. clerked for two Supreme Court justice. I. mean, who does that? I mean, Harry's. like probably one of three people like, you know, around who has like clerked. for two Supreme Court justices. Um, so. you know that this is the most frivolous. of frivolous types of filings. then to.
try to parlay that to delay a sexual. assault victim from getting the money. after winning a Just break it all down. for us, Harry, as you see this. >> All right. [clears throat] Well, I gotta. say, you don't have to clerk for two. Supreme Court justices to know this is. the most uh frivolous and obstructionist. and just, you know, complete um ignorant. sort of stance on his part. The I was a. clerk there uh and uh two two little uh. points that are pertinent. Right next. door to me was a clerk for the then.
chief justice. That's the chair that you. just mentioned from Sullivan and. Cromwell who has a revolt on his hands. because he said we're not going to do. these offensive or idiotic ones. What. happened? Did Trump twist his arm and. say you have to as he's done with so. many? I don't know. But yeah, you've. properly identified the culture within. big law of man, this I'm embarrassed. Every time I talk to somebody or go out, we have to somehow justify this.
incredible extended just complete. disrespectful. treatment of a woman who he previously. victimized and continues to defame. Uh, get us the hell out of it. That's a. really interesting side story. Here's. another uh point that's really. important. Now we understand why New. York law says you want to appeal this. Donald Trump, you losing defendant, you. better give us a bond with interest. And.
imagine if that wasn't the law. We would. be there's there's nothing the guy won't. do there. You know, he'll he'll what? Send his all his money abroad or just. lie and say, you know, oh, I'm now. bankrupt. I mean, we've saw these these. are some of the actual kinds of lies. about money that that has is the reason. that he's been convicted of 34 felonies. in New York where all this is arising. You know, he is uh but for this bond,
she would be uh knocking at an at a door. and not getting an answer again and. again and again. Um, third, you know, the courts um, understood initially this. guy's the president of the United States. and you get a little bit of slack for. that. But everyone knows, you know, what. I was saying by the other point about. being a clerk, you you get all these. petitions, including for rehearing. Last.
time the Supreme Court granted one and. reversed. 1965. That's, you know, before the. Beatles at Chase Stadium just happened. to occur to me. and it doesn't happen. And when he has only that one speed of, you know, over-the-top terrible abuse, worst thing ever, it just so um brings. him into. contempt might be a pretty strong term, but any judge hearing that the they they.
uh then affiliate him with the craziest. kinds of prosay litigants who come their. way. It it just completely undermines. his ability to even understand. This is. a point where even if you were a never. say die kind of person, your lawyer now. maybe his lawyers can't control him. would just say Donald. maybe you can delay this for another. week but at the cost of completely. embarrassing yourself in front of all.
the federal courts from the Southern. District of New York to the second. circuit which as you said a one-s. sentence order to the Supreme Court. itself anyone could tell you anywhere. who's who's been you know who's had a. cup of coffee the Supreme Court. There. is no way in the world all you're doing. is, you know, maybe you like this, but. is being a jerk and and stalling her for. another week. That money is going to. charity anyway. And you look to be an.
absolute ignoramis about the law and the. legal system. And you know, he surely. does. He's just a a deadbeat, a skin. flint, a you know, flimflam man saying. anything and everything. And I'll end. where uh you know I I with the point I. made, thank God for New York's law that. means that money is already in hand. I. think by the way we're at the very one. final legal point when you have a. petition for pending in the very case.
that case is considered live. So, um, if. Eugene Carol goes to Kaplan and says, "I. want my money." He's got a valid. argument as Trump, it doesn't apply, however, to a petition for rehearing for. good reason. Because th those never get. granted. So, that's the reason that. Kaplan could first slap him around and. say, "You're just stalling." And then. order it. And my understanding even as. this is working its way up and down is.
in the district of uh the Southern. District of New York where the money is. in some way it's all over. But the. shouting and the day or two that's going. on now is not because of his ridiculous. petition that the second circus just. denied. I my understanding is for. whatever reason and we we've all been. used to dealing with uh clerks in courts. and the like. It just takes a day or two. to print the check or get somebody to. sign or counter sign whatever. So, I.
mean, the wheels of justice grind uh. slowly, but they grind exceeding fine. She's going to get her money and soon. and he's going to look like an idiot and. already does. Well, and then you've got. the 83.3. which is. >> there's a Can I Can I jump in there. because his latest thing is to try to. say he's still got a petition for. certain in that case and that's why he's. trying to stall for the 5 million, but. that doesn't work. But that one's going.
to be really interesting. I I I let me. send it back to you, Ben. I don't want. to monopolize the airwaves here, but. just to say uh if this if the court. there's actually an issue he's trying to. propound there, and that's what he's. saying in this case now. Oh, this. important issue that I'm propounding. there, that's the reason you should do. the petition for rehearing. It's not a. reason. But if this Supreme Court takes. that issue, which among other things. he's um already um uh um been is.
procedurally barred, he's already waved. and the like. That would be a a solid to. him. That would be really revoling. >> We will see. And it will I could pretty. much predict he's gonna he's going to be. paying close to 110 you know when you. factor in interest 105 110 million you. know to Eugene Carol pretty that's my. opinion it's my prediction everybody. subscribe to Harry Litman's YouTube. channel it's called talking feds.
subscribe there now tell Harry in some. of his videos leave a comment say Ben. sent you Ben says hi thanks Harry. >> thank you Ben thank you all you mighty. >> new Midas merch Head to. store.midestouch.com. today and get yourself the best [music]. prodemocracy gear and show your support. That's store.mistouch.com.
