’Scream Mask Orgy’ Teacher Scandal Explodes as New Student Drops Disturbing Claims

It started with a few very troubling. allegations against a substitute teacher. out in Indiana, but now that case has. exploded into one of the most disturbing. sexual misconduct scandals we have ever. covered. Former teacher Britney. Foronberry is facing even more criminal. charges after yet another alleged victim. came forward. And remember, this is the. same case where Boyce said she organized. group sex sessions at her home, forcing. them to wear scream masks. So, what do.

these latest counts mean for her. defense? How much prison time could she. actually be facing? We're going to break. it all down for you right now with an. Indiana criminal defense attorney. Welcome to Sidebar, presented by Law and. Crime. I'm Jesse Weber. Now, if you've been following us here on. Sidebar, you know that we have been. digging into some of the most disturbing. teacher misconduct cases in the country. I feel like we talk about one like every. week. Well, I will tell you, we are back. once again, not with somebody new. No,

it is somebody we've talked about a lot. and now we have more shocking updates. It is the case of Britney Foronberry. Okay. She is a former teacher substitute. from Morgan County, Indiana, and she is. now facing a staggering 47 criminal. charges. That is a number that just. keeps on climbing. This comes after yet. another alleged victim has come forward. with disturbing details. And we will get. into all of that in just a bit. But we. got to catch you up to speed on how we.

got here because I will tell you, fair. warning, this timeline, it is chock full. of horrifying allegations. I'm talking. everything from accounts of molestation. to sexual misconduct, incest charges. According to the Metropolitan School. District of Martinsville, Fortonberry. started working in the district back in. October of 2023 as a substitute teacher. and resigned in January of 2024. But.

here's the thing, the district said that. that resignation wasn't due to sexual. misconduct allegations. For then began. working for the Eminence School District. in July of 2024. In August of that year, she resigned. and she resigned after. allegations surfaced that she had been. exchanging explicit messages with a. student. Now, if these allegations are. true, you would hope it would just end. there, but according to authorities, that is just the tip of this very. unfortunate iceberg. This is where the.

criminal allegations began to pile up. In the first police reports filed in. September of 2024, investigators said. victims described Fortonberry as. manipulative and persistent. One. 13-year-old told police that she would. text him constantly and that she. threatened to harm herself if he stopped. responding. Another teen said she gave. him marijuana and alcohol at her home. before forcing herself on him in the. garage. And what makes this all even. more disturbing is that these weren't. just secret interactions happening.

behind her husband's back. Yeah. Married. No. Court documents suggest. that Nicholas Fortberry didn't just know. about this behavior. He allegedly became. part of the intimidation. Detectives say. that there was one victim who told them. about a moment at the Fortonberry house. when Nicholas returned from work, had a. private conversation with Britney, and. then confronted the teen face to face. The affidavit says that the victim was. left terrified. According to the report, Britney had already told him that she. would do something bad to herself if the.

truth came out and warned that Nick. would slaughter him in front of his. family. A few weeks later, the boy says. Nicholas delivered the threat himself. According to an arrest affidavit from. March of 2025, alleged victim also. mentioned that Britney had shared that. if any of this came out that she would. herself. Alleged victim said Britney. told him that if anyone found out that. Nick would slaughter him in front of his. family. Alleged victims said about a. couple of weeks after Britney told him. this, that Nick made the threat to him. Other alleged victims describe how she.

bought them gifts, spent hundreds on. shoes and clothes, and then pressured. the boys into sex. At least one victim. reported she paid him as much as $800. for nude photos. And then came the most. bizarre detail of all. Boys had said or. alleged or claimed that she organized. group sex at her home where she required. them to wear scream masks from the movie.

and rotate every 15 minutes. Now, initially, Fortonberry was charged with. a handful of felonies in late 2024, but. by February 2025, prosecutors had filed. 29 counts. This included sexual. misconduct with a minor, child. molestation, dissemination of harmful. material contributing to the delinquency. of a minor, and the pattern allegedly. continued. In May of 2025, another. victim came forward, alleging Foronberry. invited him to her home, gave him drugs, coerced him into sex while her own.

children were in the next room. That. pushed her total charges up to 41. And. by then, prosecutors said at least nine. victims had been identified. Hey. everybody, this is another Law and Crime. legal alert. There are allegations right. now claiming that the online apps. DraftKings and FanDuel are engineered. for addiction. That's right. These. multi-billion dollar companies allegedly. continue to put profit over safety. Every free bet, every boosted parlay, every small payout triggers a dopamine. rush. And that allegedly creates.

dependency and turns harmless fun into a. detrimental habit. They allegedly keep. you hooked, chasing impossible wins and. can trap you in a cycle that can lead to. significant financial loss and. ultimately damage mental health. Well, I'll tell you what, our legal sponsors, they are taking on the online gambling. industry to potentially get compensation. for all those impacted. So, if you or a. loved one has suffered addiction or. financial hardship or mental health. issues due to sports betting apps, then. visit gamblingawsuits.com/sidebar. to take a short quiz and check your.

eligibility to file a claim. So, you. fast forward to where we are now, September of 2025 when a 10th victim. came forward. Yeah. According to new. court filings that are obtained by law. and crime, this boy told investigators. that Fortonberry first invited him over. just to hang out, do drugs, and then it. escalated and that led to the six newest. counts, bringing her total to what, 47. 47 charges. We're going to work our way. through these horrific allegations laid.

out in this new affidavit. And to help. us do this, to parse through what. exactly this all means and what we can. expect with a criminal case like this, whether or not it's actually going to. result in a trial, maybe there'll be a. plea, I want to bring on a special. guest, Indiana criminal defense attorney. Andrew Baldwin. Andrew, thank you so. much for taking the time. It's good to. see you again. >> Good to see you, Jesse. with what 47. charges spanning multiple alleged. victims over nearly two years. I got to. ask, what are the biggest strategic.

challenges for a defense attorney in a. case this complex? And I guess the. question becomes, what is that. conversation between a defense attorney. and a client who's facing a mountain of. evidence and a mountain of charges? >> Oh, those are great questions. Um, first. and foremost, under the legal theory. that we learn in law school, where. there's smoke, there's fire, uh, you. have to worry about all of these. charges, um, being put in front of a. jury. And a jury might find some of.

those charges like, I don't know if I. believe that guy or those facts aren't. exactly what we thought they would be. when compared to other facts. So, I. would normally find that guy not guilty. as a juror. but because all these other. charges exist, I think I'm just going to. have to find him guilty. Those are the. things that we worry about. And so, one. of the early things that should be going. on right now is a real uh legal analysis. of each individual charge, each in.

individual alleged victim, and to. determine whether or not you can. separate those uh charges out. And that. that benefits you strategically in a. number of ways. One way is you'd love to. go to the prosecutor and say, "Hey, if. I'm successful in severing these counts, you're going to have to try about five, six jury trials. Do you really want to. do that? Do you really? Or can we work. out an agreement?" So, that that that is. uh important stuff early on. And Indiana.

has a a severance law in place that says. you cannot as a prosecutor bring charges. in just because they are similar in. nature. In fact, that's disallowed. There's of course exceptions to that and. that's what the prosecutor would be. relying on. The second thing you you. talked about is well, what about that. tough conversation? Yeah. Sometimes uh we defense lawyers uh. we don't learn information from our. client early on until we get all the.

facts. But on a case like this, you might want. to have a sit down in the jail with your. client and say, "Hey, while we have. leverage right now, let's try to work. something out." Unless you're going to. tell me that you are completely. innocent. If you're completely innocent, then there is no good deal. You got to. go to trial. But if if you are. completely innocent uh or or aren't, then maybe we should uh look at possibly.

trying to get this matter resolved now. And you do have leverage, more leverage, I think, at the beginning typically than. you do at the end on a case like this. >> That's really interesting because you. you handle that in it's interesting to. think about the number of charges, right? one perspective, you know, you. could go from a a prosecution point of. view, there's an advantage to them, but. I I think that was important how you. highlighted it could actually be a. disadvantage if there are weaknesses in. some of those charges that may make a. jury skeptical of the entirety of the. case or a lot of the case. But also, if.

you if the defense attorney's, you know, saying, "Hey, listen. We're going to. keep filing motions to sever this case. It's going to take up more time. You. might have multiple trials. There might. be an incentive for them to drop them.". Uh, also having that conversation with. your client. I guess the big question is. if you're talking about these kinds of. allegations coupled with allegations of. threats, intimidation, manipulation, what is the evidence that is going to be. the most important? And what is that. evidence that you'd be most concerned of. for a defense attorney's perspective?

For a defense perspective, what is that. evidence that you're most concerned. about? >> It's the children. It's it's their. testimony and how they appear when they. testify. Um, you know, these are older. kids. I mean, uh, they're now in 14, 15, 16, other than her own child, who I. think is like eight or nine now, maybe. 10. Uh, but the rest of them are. teenaged boys. That's far better than. going in with teenage girls, by the way, just because juries view bo men and.

women differently. That's just a fact. Still, you don't want to go in with uh. uh very compelling testimony of these. kids that give great detail. These. probable cause affidavits provide a lot. of detail that, you know, great lies are. composed of great detail. Okay? And. great liars know how to lie by adding. detail, but that doesn't mean that. they're lying. It also could mean the. detail is because they're telling the. truth. And so, how do they testify?

Well, in Indiana, we get to depose. um uh victims or alleged victims of any. crime, including sex crimes, as long as. they're over the age of 15. So, if. they're 16 and older, which I think most. of these kids are by now, and if they. aren't, I would want to stretch this. case out until they are because I want. to depose them and see how are they. going to appear in court. Do are they. smiling a little bit when they're. testifying as if, oh, this was not as. bad, but maybe it's nervous or or maybe.

they're crying and and upset and you're. like, oh my gosh, sometimes I walk out. of a deposition and and I'll and I'll be. like, this case is over. Or sometimes. and and that can be over either way. Like this is I just had a a sex offense. case down in southern Indiana where I. walked out and I thought, oh, this case. is over for the prosecutor. But that's. Jesse the answer to the question. The. most damaging evidence is the child's. testimony and the child himself. >> Yeah. And and it's tricky. It's tricky.

cross-examining those children or those. uh you know alleged victims on the stand. and how to come out to the jury. I I. want to get in I have a lot more. questions about this, but I do want to. get into the latest round of allegations. here. So, the alleged victims, they're. not identified in the complaints um as. all the names are redacted, but here is. what it says. So, this is according to. the new supplemental probable cause. affidavit that was filed on September. 11th. So, this alleged victim told. detectives that he met Britney. Foronberry through a friend and that.

while things seemed pretty normal at. first, she was overly complimentary. She. was touchy. Those are the allegations. And he told police, quote, Britney was a. little touchy, like on his arms, and. that Britney would always compliment. him. Alleged victim said that Britney. complimented his hair, asked once to. braid his hair, and told him he had the. perfect hair. The victim then told the. detective that the situation escalated. one night in the garage. He said he was. under the influence of drugs that he. says she provided, and according to the.

probable cause statement, quote, "Brittney asked him if he wanted to come. feel her boobs." Alleged victim said he. was stoned. He thinks she gave him. shrooms. It was kind of loopy. and he. said, "Why not?" Alleged victim said. that she started feeling up on him and. that things escalated after that. Now, the portions where the alleged victim. describes the sexual encounters are just. so graphic that we're not going to get. into them, but we'll kind of sum it up. here. He says the two of them had a.

sexual encounter in Fortonberry's. garage, that their communication even. extended into social media with. Fortonberry allegedly sending him nude. pictures on Snapchat. The victim told. police that the sexual relationship. ended when he became uncomfortable after. learning about other boys. Quote, "Alleged victim said the sexual stuff. with Britney stopped after he started. getting uncomfortable." Alleged victim. said he was one of the first people. going over there, but after he heard.

about three other people after he had. been with her, he was done. He summed it. up by saying she just handed it out to. anybody. Now, Andrew, all of this. allegedly happened over a maybe three to. four week period in September of 2023, according to this statement. Um, it's. pretty damning accusations to to say the. least. And also, if you think it's. coupled with digital evidence, um, how. do you perceive it? What do you look. what do what do you what are your. takeaways here? Well, one other thing,

having read that uh new probable cause. affidavit, it does give you that detail. that we defense lawyers dread most of. the time. And so that would be of. concern to me. Uh should I depose this. uh this underage uh person? Again, deposition work so important in these. cases. Maybe you'll see some uh cracks. in his story, and that could often come. from the phone. They did do a phone. dump. the the the police asked for uh.

the accuser's uh phone. They did an a. phone extraction and he the accuser did. say, "Hey, she sent me this and she sent. me that." And you know, you can look at. old uh things that have even been. deleted on a a Celbrite phone extraction. or gray key or whichever uh one that. they use. And maybe you you as a as an. attorney can say, "Hey, he said this. happened. It doesn't show up on the. phone. How can we trust anything this.

kid says? Is he just going along cuz he. didn't get the attention that the other. kids got? Could it be something like. that?" And boy, that's some icky. territory to get into as a defense. lawyer. Really would not want to do that. at trial unless it's very plainly. obvious because you can lose a jury. very, very early on. And. >> by the way, that level of detail, I. mean, it's so specific. I always wonder. in these kinds of accounts, does that. work for the prosecution? Because a jury. could say, "That's so detailed. How. could someone, you know, make any of.

that up?" Um, it has to be true. It has. to be real. Um, but other ways that. defense attorneys could work through it. as well. >> Well, in a case like this when there's. multiple victims or alleged victims, if. there's a similar story among all the. alleged victims, then you could as a. defense lawyer try to say, "Hey, these. guys are all telling the same story.". Um, so that's where they get the detail, but man, no, I do not want that detail. I mean, if I can avoid the deal, I I. like uh accusers in in cases like this.

where it's very very generic information. and they're not saying, "Well, at this. then we went into this particular room. and sat at this particular chair and. they didn't detail everything." And uh. it just it it's hard to believe that. that people can make up stuff uh that. much detail. Uh so no, I don't think. it's I don't think it's good, but the. detail can hurt a case if again there's. something else to compare it to. And the. most common thing nowadays is the phone.

is is or the computers. And if they're. saying that I was in a certain place on. a certain day and you can get a, you. know, kind of a geo a photograph that. was taken on that day and it's 100 miles. away, then all of a sudden you have. something awesome to work with. They. provided that detail and now they're a. liar. So. >> yeah, but you got to dig in as a defense. lawyer and look for those uh those. problems. >> I want to go into the new charges. because here's the quick breakdown. according to the court docket. So, three. additional counts of sexual misconduct.

with a minor, one charge of. dissemination of harmful matter, two. counts of contributing to the. delinquency of a minor. Andrew, when you. look at those charges, some of them feel. quite broad. It can encompass a lot of. different conduct. Um, what do you take. away from those specific charges? And. again, I go to the defense perspective. here. Are there avenues to fight against. them? I do wonder what would be the. defense's strategy here other than. trying to strike the credibility or. trying to work out a deal. Those.

specific charges, anything stand out to. you? >> Um, no. It it it's kind of a from a. prosecutor's perspective, throw. everything against the wall and see what. sticks. And and I understand it because. um sometimes some facts you never know. what's going to happen at trial and and. sometimes you expect a witness to come. in and say something and then they don't. say that something and all of a sudden. one of the counts that you really. counted on is gone. So you you throw in. as many counts as you can. And in the.

sex offense um criminal world, there's a. variety there's a whole section in in in. Indiana law that covers a lot of ground. And so it's not surprising that they. asked for all those charges to be filed. You know, the the in addition to just. those charges related to that accuser, it's also that is being those charges. with that accuser are being added to all. these other charges with all these other. accusers. And it's again where there's. smoke, there's fire. These are things.

you have to worry about. And you know, from a strategy perspective, you said. what what can you do? Um, you know, outside of doing this deposition work. that I keep talking about, Indiana is. one of like I think five or six states. that allows depositions in criminal. matters. And it's a huge help to both. sides. It usually helps things get. resolved because either side can say my. guy's credible or my guy's not credible. But beyond that, beyond that, when all. these people are on there now, you got.

to start looking at each individual. accuser and their situation. Do they. want to go to trial? Are their parents. angry? Do um will they be willing and. amendable to a to a a plea? These are. things that I actually ask at a. deposition often at the very end. What. do you want to have happen to this. person? And if they I want the book. thrown at him. I want him in prison the. rest of his life. That's one thing. if. they're like, I don't really want to go. to trial. I'm nervous about that. Now, that's a little insight information you. can use during plea negotiations.

>> Yeah, let's talk about that real quick. What would be an advantageous. plea for prosecutors here when they're I. mean, they're essentially accusing her. of being not only a sexual predator, but. a monster. What would be a plea that. would be acceptable for the community. and for the alleged victims here? um. without going to a trial. I get it. You. know, not have to put these uh people on. the stand. It's painful. It's time.

consuming exposing a jury to all this. If you can spare it, I get it. But what. would be a reasonable, probable plea offer that prosecutors. would accept in a case like this? >> That's a great question, and it's it it. really depends on the prosecutor and how. how they think and how they operate. Are. they, for example, bothered by pre-trial. publicity? are they worried that if they. are too lenient in some way that that's. going to come back and bite the. prosecutor's butt at election time. So.

they have to worry about that. Um and. and that's you know that's one thing but. also the these are human beings too and. they prosecutors have kids and they put. themselves in the shoes of these parents. and so what is a reasonable well that is. in the eye of that particular. prosecutor. I will give you some. examples of of what I think would be. reasonable is once you as the lawyer. have gone through as the defense lawyer. have gone through the charges and got. gotten a pretty good feel for what is. provable beyond a reasonable doubt and.

what isn't. Then um you you might go to. the prosecutor and say what what are you. most concerned about? Um uh are you are. you concerned that every alleged victim. is he's found guilty related to every. alleged victim or are you talking about. are you do you care about time? Do you. want this person to be in jail for. prison for a long long time? Um or do. you care about the charge that they. plead guilty to? Because for example. there's I think nine F felony fours. charged. That's 2 to 12 years on each.

Uh 12* uh 9 is 108. It's 108 years. With. an F4, when you go to prison, you're you. have more freedom. You're able to move. move about more easily. You're you're. open to getting, you know, some. different treatment and things that. you're not eligible for as an F1. F1's. more serious 20 to 40 years. So, I. sometimes what I'll talk to clients. about is, you know, if we lose and. you're hit with this F1, you're. basically going to be in lockdown and.

you're not going to have any type of. life. However, if you go in on F4s that. add up to an F1, then you're going to. have some type of life in prison. And. so, you have to have those really. uncomfortable conversations. And I would. say that's where maybe the action is. Hey, can we plead guilty to a bunch of. F4s that add up and and we do we call. this in in Indiana or other places. probably too a floor and a ceiling where. we know the judge gets to make the. decision but but this person's going to.

do uh at least let's say 10 years and. but no more than 30 years. Can we work. within that confines, Mr. Prosecutor, Miss Prosecutor and but I don't want him. pleading guilty to F1. So we might as. well go to trial if you're going to do. that. That's the type of conversation. you have behind closed doors with. prosecutors. >> What about the case surrounding her. husband? So Nicholas, we talked about. this before. He is charged with. intimidation, failure to report. We. mentioned earlier how one victim claimed. that Nicholas threatened to literally. kill him if he ever spoke about what.

happened. He's out on bond. He has a. jury trial schedule later this year. What do you make of the case against. him? >> That's a much better case. I mean that. he was telling the the kid that he. threatened allegedly to not uh do this. with his wife anymore. So it it's a kind. of a weird argument, but you could say, hey, he was trying to do the right and. honorable thing. It also kind of shows. that he has knowledge on the other hand. of what might be going on, but he's not. approving of it. And I did read in the. new PCA, the new probable cause. affidavit with that new child. Something.

that really stuck out to me was this new. alleged victim says the dad didn't know. she was giving us all these drugs. So. that could be useful. You know, as a. prosecutor, you might go to the dad and. say, "Look, we don't really care about. you that much. Um, we just want you to. testify." And um maybe that's how it. gets resolved. I don't know that he has. I on one hand is I'm trying to sit here. and think about all these probable cause. affidavit. Jesse, as you know, you've. read them, they really paint a picture. of like a a chaotic scene where just.

young boys are at this woman's house all. the time. How can this guy not know. that? But on the other hand, if if he's. at work a lot, and the other weird thing. that this kid said that is that um uh. the Britney Foronberry brought these. kids to her to his workplace at the fire. station, which I just thought was. bizarre, too. Why is she doing that? and. it makes maybe makes him look more. culpable. I don't know. So, I don't know. that he's he's going to he's facing like.

real time here, jail time with his. charges. I think his case probably gets. resolved one way or the other short of. trial. It. >> it's just another shocking component to. this story. Um I want to go back to. Britney's defense, though. So, her. defense team, >> they have filed notice of intent to use. a mental illness or defect defense. They're asking apparently for. psychological evaluations to determine. whether she was competent at the time of. the alleged crimes. And according to. that filing reviewed by WTR, council has.

a good faith belief that the defendant. likely suffers from a mental disease or. defect, but lacks the expertise to. profer whether the defendant appreciated. the wrongfulness of her conduct at the. time of the offense. Such an opinion. must come from qualified experts. pursuant to statute. Andrew, you and I. both know that a mental health defense. can be an uphill battle. I'm also not. surprised that that is what they may be. going with if they can't go with or they. may have trouble suggesting all of this.

is a lie. None of this happened. You. know, this may be I don't know, for lack. of a better term, a Hail Mary, but there. could be something legitimate here. >> Your thoughts on the legal standard in. Indiana for this kind of defense and. whether or not it would be successful? I. I think it is incred as you just said. it's incredibly. uh difficult to win on on a mental. defect type of some people used to call. it the insanity defense especially. there's some convers there's some uh.

discussion in the probable cause. affidavit where Britney is saying do not. please don't tell anybody what we're. doing or I'm going to kill myself and. that shows that she appreciates the. seriousness of the crime. She knows it's. a crime. And that's the type of thing. that uh in Indiana you're going to have. at least I think two psychologists. uh are going to interview her. And. that's danger by the way because anytime. you have a psychologist go into her jail. cell and you're opening yourself up to.

her just making even more damaging. admissions if she had I don't know that. she has made any yet. But when you're. when you do um ask for uh and seek a. mental health uh type of defense, you're. basically saying, "Hey, doctor, go in. there, interview her, and then he's. going to come out and say, "Yes, she. appreciated it. No, she didn't." But. while we're at it, here's a bunch of. stuff she said. And that that really. helps the the prosecution out typically. So, you got to be very very careful when. you make that request, as the as the.

defense apparently has done. Does this. come down to, like you said, like a. battle of experts? You have the. defense's psychological evaluators, you. have the prosecution. Um, and I would. imagine that just delays this case even. further. >> It could. It's there's there's like in. Indiana, there's like two or three um of. these psychologists. This is what they. pretty much do every day. They go to. different places to different jails. They interview different people and they. put out different reports. It's pretty.

rare uh for a defendant to have their. own expert actually. They usually are. using the the experts that the judge um. hires for the case. Uh but yeah, it. could be a battle of the expert if she. has enough money to hire her own. experts. But, you know, these experts, it's not like it's hard to fi to find. these what some people call, you know, paid. um. who are going to I I don't want to use.

the word, but who who come in and just. make up a story. >> You want me to say it what they say and. you kind of try a hired gun. >> A hired gun. That would be a way to say. it. Yes, that would be a way to say it. >> It's not I don't like the term either, but you know, that's what's used. That's. what's used. Yeah. >> Yeah. I mean they, you know, and but. it's hard to most of these doctors and. psychologists, they have a reputation. They don't want to be thought of as a. bad uh, you know, a bad person that. makes their decision based upon money. So, you know, it looks really bad when.

you hire an expert to go into the jail. and talk to them and it's pretty much. going to be known that you've done that. and then you don't you don't tender a. report to the prosecutor. Well, I wonder. why. I wonder what that what the experts. said. I mean, there's just all kinds of. problems when you get into that world. And I'm not saying, hey, we have uh a. number of cases in our firm where we're. we're using that defense and it's valid. and we believe in it. But when it's used. as a Hail Mary, as you said, it can. really lead to other problems, unanticipated problems. talking about.

problems. I mean, what began with ju. with, you know, a handful of charges, it. is now snowballed into one of the most. shocking abuse cases, I I think we've. alleged abuse cases that we have ever. covered and ever seen here on Sidebar, and it is still growing. Uh, Andrew. Baldwin, thank you so much for taking. the time. Really really appreciate it. You have terrific insight um and. obviously a phenomenal defense attorney. trying to, you know, talk about. different scenarios here. So, thank you. for taking the time. Really appreciate. it. Great to see you again, Jesse. Thank.

you. >> And that is all we have for you right. now here on Sidebar. Everybody, thank. you so much for joining us. And as. always, please subscribe on YouTube, Apple Podcast, Spotify, wherever you. should get your podcast. You can follow. me on X or Instagram. I'm Jesse Weber. I'll see you next time. [Music].