Crying Cop, Husband Accused in Twisted Sex Crimes Case

An absolutely wild day in court in. Plymouth, Massachusetts as a police. officer and her husband face a judge. accused of shocking sexual abuse related. to their adopted son. >> Samantha says, "I don't want to take his. virginity." Daniel replies, "He's. already lost his virginity." But a big. twist came when the pair's defense. attorneys had a chance to speak and. turned everything upside down. >> He sends a text to Samantha with a. picture of food he had cooked up and she. said, "Did you make that?" Yeah, I did. I'm a fucking chef. That's the type of.

conversation he's engaging in with her 5. days before coming in here and making. these salacious allegations. >> We're going to take inside the tense. courtroom, break down both the. prosecution's case, as well as what the. couple's attorneys had to say about the. alleged victim. Welcome to Sidebar, presented by Law&Crime. I'm Jesse Weber. Look, when I'm covering a story, >> [music]. >> one of the things I think about, you. know, the dangers in the world. I was. thinking about this. Do you ever really. contemplate how a stranger can find and. use anything about your private life?

Yeah, your name, your phone number, your. address, it's all out there, which is. why I want everybody who follows Sidebar. to keep your data safe online. Our. sponsor, Incogni, can do that. They. track down all these old posts and. search sites that are exposing your. information and then they demand its. removal. Look, I was shocked. Turns out. databases had all my information and. within days Incogni was taking them. down. is simple, you just create an. account and Incogni's going to do the. rest. Plus, their new unlimited plans. custom removal feature lets you submit. specific links that their privacy. experts will personally investigate and. remove. So, if you care about staying.

safe, take your privacy back with. Incogni. Go to incogni.com/sidebar. Use code sidebar for 60% off an annual. plan. When a Massachusetts police. officer and her husband were arrested. this week, needless to say, this added. an element of shock. But it's when you. hear the details about what allegedly. happened in the couple's home involving. their adopted son that I would just say. maybe you throw in anger and disgust. The officer was put on leave. Members of. multiple law enforcement agencies showed.

up at their home at 6:00 a.m. to arrest. them both. And they were brought before. a judge to hear the allegations against. them. We're talking about 31-year-old. Samantha Pellrine. I've also heard it. Samantha Pelrine, but we'll go with. Pellrine. And her husband, 37-year-old. Daniel Ferrand. And they are both facing. charges of child rape. Now, before we. dive into the couple's arraignment and. their push for bail, I just want to give. you a little bit of background here. So, according to the media outlet WCVB, on. March 15th, a 21-year-old man went to.

the Massachusetts State Police Barracks. to report that both Pellrine and Ferrand. had sexually assaulted him for years. starting when he was just 14 or 15 years. old. So, state police, they quickly. launched an investigation. Pellrine had. been a Plymouth police officer since. April of 2022 and she said in a. department Facebook post honoring female. officers that she had always wanted to. be a police officer. But now she's on. unpaid leave. And to be clear, yes, these are allegations, she hasn't been.

proven guilty. But the department did. release a statement on Thursday after. her arrest saying, quote, "We are. appalled and deeply disturbed by the. allegations. We hold our officers to the. highest of standards and expect them to. uphold their sworn duty both on duty and. off. Our primary mission is to safeguard. the public's trust and uphold the law. We value human life, fairness, integrity, accountability, and. professionalism. The conduct alleged is. in violation of our values and of our. basic principles as police officers to. serve and protect. While we respect the.

judicial process, we remain committed to. a timely and thorough internal. investigation to find the facts, review. available evidence, and take appropriate. administrative action. Officer. Pellrine's duty status is currently. under review." Right. So, basically, they're going to be looking at. everything she did while she served as a. member of law enforcement. Also, you. know, how she was hired. And let's also. go to Ferrand. So, he apparently runs a. pest control business. It's called. Pilgrim Pest Professionals. He and. Pellrine, they were apparently raised in. the Plymouth area. This is according to. their attorneys. They reportedly live on. a hobby farm together and Ferrand also.

has a young daughter from his previous. marriage. You see, while Pellrine's. attorney said his client, quote, "Didn't. have so much as a speeding ticket," when. you go to Ferrand and his alleged past. behavior, that is what's drawn a lot of. scrutiny right now. Why do I say that? So, now I want to go to this direct. reporting from the Boston Globe. It says. in 2019, police in Plymouth asked a. judge to issue an order denying Ferrand. a gun license citing a laundry list of. problems and conflicts including. numerous allegations of harassment and.

trespassing. Police described, quote, "One incident wherein Mr. Ferrand texted. his estranged wife 436. times in a 13-hour period and another. wherein he telephoned another person 700. times in a short period of time. His. neighbors repeatedly complained about. Ferrand mistreating his animals, which. included horses, goats, chickens, and. pigs. They complained about him shooting. guns on his property, chasing a. neighbor's dog with a machete, and using. binoculars to watch them. He yells at.

people, it appears mostly women, and has. put all of them in fear of him. His. personality is that of a controlling, erratic, and angry person. He is. manipulative and sinister." So, now it. seems that his wife has been pulled into. the claims against him and they both. face just a full list of very serious. felony charges. According to the. district attorney, Ferrand is charged. with six counts of indecent assault and. battery, 12 counts of aggravated rape of. a child, one count assault and battery, and one count of assault and battery.

with a dangerous weapon. Pellrine is. charged with three counts of aggravated. rape of a child and one count of. statutory rape. Very, very serious. And. as the attorneys, the court personnel, and the defendants themselves gathered. in Plymouth District Court for. arraignment on Thursday, I got to say I. don't think many of them were prepared. for exactly what they heard. The hearing. started off like any other with the. court being called to order, the judge. asking about their pleas, motions, and. bail. Let's take a look. >> Commonwealth, I do not see. any motion for pretrial detention. Do.

you want to be heard on bail? Correct, Your Honor. The Commonwealth is not. moving for dangerousness. I would like. to be heard on cash bail along with. conditions of release. Okay. And are you. aware of the requests of the. Commonwealth? Okay. I am not. specifically aware of the conditions, but I can probably gauge what the. request is going to be. Okay. All right. Um, so, not guilty pleas are. entered on behalf of both defendants at. this time. And I will hear you, Commonwealth, in your request for bail. Yes, Your Honor. So, the Commonwealth's. request is the same for both defendants.

The Commonwealth is requesting $250,000. cash bail along with the following. conditions: that the defendants be. ordered to stay away and have no contact. with the alleged victim in this case, that they be ordered to stay away from. children under the age of 18, that they. surrender all firearms in their. possession, that they remain in Massachusetts for. the pendency of this case, and that they. surrender passports to the court if they. do have them. But then what happened? Commonwealth Attorney, Plymouth. Assistant DA James Duffy, then launched. into a disturbing litany of allegations.

that have been leveled against both. Pellrine and Ferrand by their adopted. son, who's an adult now. And I'm going. to warn you right now, it is really. tough to listen to. The allegations. before the court essentially date back. to 2018. The alleged victim in this case. in 2018 became a foster child of the two. defendants before you. And just for. clarity's sake, so there's no confusion, um, I intend to refer to the defendants. by their first name so the court is. aware who I'm talking about when I. discuss which conduct. The allegations are that the alleged. victim in this case moved in with the.

defendants back in 2018. At the time, the alleged victim was 14 years old. Fast forward to May, between May and June of 2019 when the. alleged victim is still 14 years old, uh, that's where the first allegation of. sexual assault comes. This is against. Daniel. The alleged victim in this case alleges. that on that occasion, uh, Daniel. brought, uh, the alleged victim into the. master bedroom at his home, that he then. forced his into the alleged victim's.

mouth, that he forced the alleged victim. to put his into Daniel's mouth, that he. touched the alleged victim's and he. forced the alleged victim to touch his. The alleged victim then discloses that. this continues almost weekly, um, for. the next couple of years. Fast forward now to the fall of 2019. So, at this point, the alleged victim. would be 15 years old. It's alleged that. on one occasion in the fall of 2019, specifically September after the. defendants had been married, that Daniel.

was again sexually abusing the alleged. victim in the bedroom when Samantha. walked into the bedroom. It's disclosed. that at this point, Samantha leaves the. room and doesn't come back for the rest. of the day. In October of 2019, Daniel. summons the alleged victim to the. bedroom. When the alleged victim walks into the. bedroom, he sees Daniel having. with Samantha. Daniel then removes the. alleged victim's pants and instructs. Samantha to perform on the alleged. victim, which Samantha denies at that. time. Fast forward to a week after that.

So, we're still in the fall of 2019 and. the alleged victim is still 15 years. old. There's another incident where. Daniel again is sexually assaulting the. alleged victim by forcing his into the. alleged victim's mouth and forcing the. alleged victim's. into his mouth. Samantha walks into the. room. At first, it's alleged that she. goes into the bathroom and Daniel. follows. "I don't want to take his virginity.". Daniel replies, "He's already lost his. virginity." Samantha then is only. wearing a bra. She lays down on the bed. Daniel then instructs the alleged victim.

to insert his into her. He does. While this is happening, when. the alleged victim slows down, Daniel comes up behind the alleged. victim and pushes him to force him to. keep going, uh, on the intercourse. This. happens numerous times through 2019 and. carrying over into 2020. Most of the. allegations take place in the home. There is, uh, an allegation that. happened outside the home. This was an. indecent assault and battery where it's. alleged that Daniel uh, touched the. alleged victim's while in a work truck.

in the county. This continues on with the three of them. with the alleged victim being forced to. partake in these sexual encounters with. Samantha and Daniel. And then it changes a little bit in. about February of 2020. In February of 2020, there's an occasion. where the alleged victim is laying on. the couch with Samantha. Samantha gets. up off the couch. She removes her. clothes. She instructs the alleged.

victim to remove his clothes and then. forces him to have with her at that. point in time. Up until that point in. time, the disclosure is that Daniel and. Samantha and the alleged victim would. only interact as a group of three, but. from this point in February 2020, it now. changed to where Samantha was performing. these assaults on her own without Daniel. being present. The allegations, your. honor, that these sexual assaults and. and essentially these same details. proceed until 2025.

Those are essentially the allegations, your honor, that are before the court. Wow. So, according to an affidavit, the. alleged victim wrote when applying for a. restraining order against the couple, which was reviewed by the Boston Globe, the man had apparently said that his. grandmother and his aunt raised him from. the age of 3 to 12. They then apparently. introduced him to some quote church. friends, so Pellerin and Farran. He. started living with them and says they. were granted legal guardianship about a. year later. And that is when the alleged.

abuse started. So, the prosecutor. explained to the court why they were. requesting such a large bail amount. here. The Commonwealth's request is due. to the serious nature of these. allegations and the potential flight. risk of these defendants pose. specifically. With the charges that the defendants are. facing, obviously they are superior court only. charges on here. They've now been charged, so their. standing in the community has changed. They've formally been charged and if. they are eventually convicted of these. charges, they're facing a significant. mandatory minimum of 15 years.

specifically on the aggravated rape. through a joint venture theory. That's a significant mandatory minimum. that they face and the Commonwealth. would argue that that changes their. situation where they do become a flight. risk given the allegations before the. court. I will note for the court, they. do not have criminal records. This is. the first entry onto their criminal. records. So, the Commonwealth's request. for bail along with conditions is based. largely, in fact, is based on the. allegations before the court to ensure. that they continue to answer on these. charges and to also protect the safety.

of the alleged victim in this case. So, for those reasons, I would request. $250,000 cash bail, a stay away, no. contact with the alleged victim, stay. away from children under the age of 18, surrender all firearms, remain in. Massachusetts, and surrender passport. Also, your honor, the Commonwealth did. file a motion to impound in regards to. both defendants and I do have motions. for protective orders if I may just. approach and file this with the court. Now, the judge asked for a little bit. more clarification on one of the charges. that Farran faces. It's assault and.

battery with a dangerous weapon. Take a. look. Can you just give me a sentence or. two about the assault and battery with a. dangerous weapon with respect to. Yes, your honor. So, >> Farran, So, there were there were. occasions where Daniel would request. that the alleged victim perform sexual. acts on him and the alleged victim would. refuse. Specifically, there's an. occasion in the summer of 2019 when. they're in the kitchen of the home. Daniel requests a sex act. The alleged. victim says no. Daniel then strikes, uh, punches the. alleged victim in the face. Victim falls.

to the ground, hits his head on the. ground. That would be the basis of the. assault and battery with a dangerous. weapon. He then reaches into the alleged. victim's pants and squeezes his. There were other occasions where he. would, uh, demand that the alleged victim perform. sex acts on him when he would say no and. he would either throw glasses at him or. he would hit him physically. So, after. those gross, shocking claims were. entered into the record, Pellerin's. attorney, Joseph Kraussky Jr., turned. the accusations on their head. And he. revealed some very concerning apparent.

holes in this man's story. Your honor, on behalf of Samantha Pellerin, I am. requesting that. the court release her on her personal. recognizance. with the assent to two conditions that. she have no contact directly or. indirectly excepting through counsel. uh, with any of the named witnesses or. the named alleged victim. The. Commonwealth has just told you that. their standing in the community has now.

changed. Well, that is legally. incorrect. Pursuant to our declaration of rights in. section 76, there is a presumption of. personal recognizance. As you know, the bail statute has 28. criteria laid out for you to assess and. determine what is the amount sufficient. but not greater than necessary that will. ensure these two individuals, specifically my client, comes to the. court. Certainly the allegations, the.

mere allegations are serious. Certainly. the potential penalty is significant. But most of the criteria is designed. answering the question giving the court. information about ties to the community. and good evidence that the person will. not flee the prosecution. With that in mind, uh, Ms. Pellerin is 31 years old. She lives at the property. right here in Plymouth, Massachusetts.

She was born in South Shore Hospital in. Weymouth, Massachusetts, but she was. raised and spent her entire life here in. Plymouth. She was educated, went to. Plymouth South High School where she. graduated, then went on and earned a. bachelor degrees from a bachelor degree. from Salem State with a degree in. criminal justice. Uh, after that, she worked at the. Greater Plymouth Health and Family. Service Center there under the umbrella. of the Kennedy-Donovan Center. She was a. family support advocate. She was.

gainfully employed. She was a revered. employee. Helped many families along the. way. Uh, after that, she pursued her. lifelong dream and she was sworn into. the Plymouth Police Department in 2022. She has worked there with distinction. with distinction since 2022. Uh, my client doesn't have any entries. on her care. She doesn't have so much as. a speeding ticket. I think the timeline is a little bit.

important for you to make your. determination. Uh, first of all, uh, this adult was never a foster child. He's now 21 years old. Uh, in June of 2028, he had basically. there was no place else for him to go. Uh, he. >> Sorry, counsel. I think you said 2028. Excuse me, 2018. There was no place else. for him to go. Uh, there was allegations. made against his biological parents. There was an aunt that was doing the. best but didn't have the faculties or.

facilities to take care of him. He. certainly came to the home with some. documented problems. He was on. medication and he had several diagnoses. They right away, after being asked to. take him in, entered into a guardianship. about a month later. The timeline and what's alleged against. him takes place over the course of 2019, 2020, 2021. I will tell you at his. urging, when he was an adult at 18 years.

old, he urged them to legally and. formally adopt him. Uh, at first it was rebuffed because his. biological father would not sign off on. it, but he persisted and when he was 18, they adopted him and we have. documentation, we have pictures of the. celebration. This is after. they allegedly had been physically. assaulting him three to four times a. week. Uh, I will tell you what's also. important as it relates to the timeline.

The government's assertion that they are. a flight. risk is belied by the actual history of. the. Now, these are allegations that are. six, seven, you know, years old. The. allegations don't come to light till. March 17th, 2026. That's when he applies. for a restraining order. When he applied. for a restraining order, my client, Samantha Pellerin, was notified by her.

department and through other sources. that she was now under investigation. I. reached out, talked to Trooper Dunn. I. knew the nature of the allegations. against her. She has had 10 days to. assemble resources and funds and. whatever other means she has. to flee. She has not done that. She has. remained at the family home where they. live. She is at all times. uh, been available and her whereabouts. have been known to the Commonwealth and.

to the State Police. Uh, she has strong. ties to the community. In that home, uh, they have a significant property. They. have a hobby farm. They have animals. Uh, the co-defendant has a 10-year-old. daughter. They have a successful. business with employees. All of their. ties are right here to Plymouth County. They don't have the desire or the intent. to go anyplace else and the best. evidence of that is them remaining here. and facing these allegations. They were.

taken into custody this morning without. any prior notice to counsel. We were in. the middle of preparing for a. restraining order hearing that's on for. tomorrow. It's a little bit interesting. in the restraining order hearing because. the alleged victim went under oath. and swore to certain things in front of. uh, Judge McDonough and one of the. things he swore to was that he's felt. that his life excuse me that my client. posed a threat to his safety. Posed a.

threat of imminent harm to his. well-being. And he had told the judge that he moved. out in either early February or late. January of 2026. I I think the. timeline's really a distinction without. the difference. Uh but again, what he told her is that. he was afraid for his safety and he left. the court with the. implication that he had not had any. contact with them because he said. specifically. that he moved out early February and. I've heard that they are looking for me.

That's what he said under oath to get. the restraining order. Well, it just so happens that on February 4th, after he moved out, he went to their. home. He apologized for his conduct. He had. engaged in a physical assault of Mr. Foran. Told them he was going to the Coast. Guard. He asked to continue working at. the company until April of 2026 during. the same time where he's allegedly. purportedly afraid for his safety. He. asked if he could go on a family trip.

with them to Jamaica. He asked them. about a skiing trip to Sunday River. He asked if he could still come over for. Sunday dinners. February 18th, he broke into the house. through with a ladder through a window. We have a witness verifying that they. pulled up and that he pulled up at the. house to check on it because they were. away and they saw his vehicle, the. alleged victim's vehicle, in the. driveway. February 27th, he's telling the court he's afraid for.

his safety. We have verification he asked for his. job back and actually went back to work. March 2026, we have video of him showing. up at the house. in a pickup truck, a work truck that. his. father had given to him to sell. In the. video shows them engaged in a cordial. conversation talking about the fact that. they got the truck running and they're. going to be able to resell it. This is. only. 18 or 19 days prior to when he applied.

for the restraining order, the same. operative period of time when he said he. was terrified of these two. Uh March 7th, 2026, there's an encounter at a gas station. with him and his father. He's with. another female, female named They all. engage in a cordial conversation. March 9th, 8 days before he goes under oath and. he's talking about Samantha Pellerin, there's a text exchange where she caught.

where he calls him. and she texts back, "I missed your call. You all right?" This so-called alleged. victim said, "Yeah, just tired. Need. someone to talk to to stay awake. Driving. Need someone to text." 8 days. Under oath, he said he was terrified. then. March 11th, he actually sold the truck. that had been gifted to him from his. father for $3,100. March 12th, 5 days before he comes in under oath, he. sends a text to Samantha.

with a picture of food he had cooked up. And she said, "Did you make that?". "Yeah, I did. I'm a chef." That's the. type of conversation he's engaging in. with her 5 days before coming in here. and making these salacious allegations. about when he was 14 or 15. March 13th, again, verification he asked. to remain on at pest control. March. 13th, 4 days before that. What else do. we have? Well, because of allegations. made against this guy, not them, DCF had.

to come to the house on prior occasions. There was an allegation that he had. engaged in inappropriate behavior with. his step-sister. DCF came and it's not that they were. able to substantiate the allegations. against him, but fully engaged in a vetting of the. home, the suitability of the home. And. you know from your experience, the. fundamental questions are asked, "Do you. feel safe in the home? Has anyone abused. you either physically or sexually?" And.

we can only assume that those were all. checked negative because DCF. unsubstantiated the complaints against. him, but filed no further action against. these two. So, with DCF investigating. this house on at least two prior. occasions, there was no evidence of wrongdoing. We also know that there was a history. with this young man. He was a problem and we can document it. He had accused someone falsely. of sexually inappropriate behavior when.

he was in high school. When he later. came clean and admitted it was a sexual. encounter he had with a teammate on his. basketball team. Fast forward to December 2025 and to. January 2026, he's dating this young woman that's. mentioned in the police report and. that's really the genesis of where this. started. He wanted to do things his own. way. He continued against the parents'. wishes to have her stay over. They were. concerned about a young child being in. the house, him having her stay.

overnight. Continued to break the rules. We have. him on 4:45 in the morning in late. November where he has told Judge. McDonough that Mr. Foran assaulted him. and he described the incident. We have. him jumping on Mr. Foran, putting him in. a headlock, trying to choke him out. where he's clearly the first aggressor. The real issue came to a head. We have a. letter and this is the person that's.

scared. We have a letter from his. girlfriend where she accuses this. so-called victim of raping her and we. have that letter. So, this is a case that has viable. defenses, but your fundamental question. and it's not a question of public. safety. They didn't move pursuant to. 58A. Brangan doesn't allow you to. consider public safety. The fundamental question is are they. going to do the right thing and appear. and the presumption is yes. And the. evidence you have before you should.

point towards yes. Now, Krawczyk also. addressed Pellerin's career as a police. officer, a position that requires the. trust of the public. Let me comment. about this about the fact that my. client's a police officer. I don't come. to you and say that a police officer. should be treated any more favorably. than any other civilian counterpart, but. they certainly shouldn't be treated. disproportionately. unfavorably. I have clients all over the.

state charged with rape. And not one of. them is held on anything close. to this amount of bail. And there is. something to be said that she's a police. officer because you know her ties to the. community are strong and she's been. vetted. Her background's been vetted. Her personal history's been vetted. Her. life in high school and in college and. any issues of discipline in high school. and college have been successfully. vetted. I'm asking you for 5,000 because. I have no doubt, nor should you, that.

she will appear to face these charges, Judge. Foran's attorney, Tamari Kovac, also spoke, reiterating what Krawczyk. had said and providing a little more. context. Their son. has been employed for my client, for. Dan, for for for a few years. Uh. He wanted to. go out on his own and see if he can, you. know, sort of have start something, a. business, or be successful, not tied to. his father's business.

Uh so, he applied for a job. It was with. the. a ferry and then for some reason there. was some misunderstanding and the. alleged victim missed the. missed the meeting. So, he texts Dan and. asks for his job back. And like any. supportive father, it's like, "Would you. Sure. Would you like to meet at You want. to meet at Dunkin' Donuts, Starbucks? You pick.". Now, if somebody who has been physically. and sexually abusing somebody for years,

is that the language you would use, "You. pick?". He offers his son his job back. And. there is a very Not only is it just a. cordial conversation, it is a. conversation coming from love, from a. father saying, "I support you and I. understand. why you're. looking for employment outside of the. family business, but of course you're. welcome back.". You know, I support you in your. endeavors and you know, I want you to be. successful. That is the true father That.

is the true relationship. I also want to talk about the mark uh. some of these dates leading up to when. he appears here on 3/17 saying how. terrified he is. And I will get to. obviously some of where my client's you. know, where he's from and his ties to. the community. However, on the day that he came here to. apply for the restraining order on 3/17, he had just called his mother, called.

Sam. He had the She didn't pick up, but he. had reached out to her. There are I. mean, I was baffled when I I I read the. affidavit for the restraining order and. I got a copy of it and I listened to it. and then I'm looking at the information. my that my client is providing me. These. are He There we have videos of him. They're at the house. They are working. They are having cordial, what we might. consider just mundane conversations.

about work. My client has. for many years had a lot of security. cameras. He has very expensive equipment. that is kept at the home. You can see. them. Your Honor, if you would like, I'm. happy to approach. I have videos of um. the uh. of their son driving into the property. with Dan following his truck. It's very. mundane conversations. I have video of my client being attacked. by him. So interestingly, when he.

he's 21 years old. He gets he has a. girlfriend who doesn't live close by and. the parents are like you can we support. you in this relationship but she we. don't know her and she cannot sleep. here. So what does he do? He sneaks he. keeps trying to sneak her into the. house. When that's not working, he's. with other people. They're waking up. There are people they don't know in the. home. So this couple are sleeping in the. in the trucks. They're putting they're.

putting tents up and they have told them. you you can of course you can date her. She's welcome in but she cannot sleep. here. So at one night when they discover. that they are there, he tells him like. these are the rule like you broke you. know the rules you broke the rules. I. want you out. If you don't leave, I'm. going to call the police. And what does he do? You can see it on. the camera. He brutally attacks my. client and as a. caring loving father should do, he just.

you know, puts him to the test trying to. stop him telling him stop stop stop. Is somebody who is abusing their son the. way that he is alleging? Do you say I'm. going to call the police? This troubled. young man had not been following the. house rules and then it finally was. enough you have like you need to find. somewhere else to live. So this is what. he does and then he fabricates these. allegations for attention with the. biological family. Only he knows the. motivation.

However, when he came to court, he was. disingenuous. He was manipulative. He. does not tell the judge, "Hey, also like. I just called Sam today. I've been. talking to them. I've been employed by. him this entire time. I am at the house. regularly. They are texting like hey we. set aside. you know, we have a text string. We set. aside some shelves so that you can store. some of your boxes because there was. some water ice water damage that they're.

going to be renovating that part of the. house. So like here's where you can keep. some of your things. These are just. conversations that you would expect of. any you know, between an adult child and. and loving parents. He didn't have to. live there your honor. In 2025, I believe he was making about $80,000. 2024 making over $50,000. So this is not a vulnerable person who. has no place to go and is forced to live. at this house. This is where he chose to.

live every day. Now, the judge herself. seemed a bit shaken by everything that. had just come out in the courtroom. So. she announced her decision on bail. She. extended the protective order on behalf. of the alleged victim that had been set. to expire today. This is according to. the Boston Globe. Take a look. After. hearing, the court sets. With respect to Samantha Pelrine, the. court sets bail in the amount of. $10,000. As conditions if she should. meet that bail, she is to have no. contact and stay away with the. complaining witness in this matter,

surrender the passport, remain in. Massachusetts and surrender any. firearms. If you violate any of those conditions. that the court is setting, your bail may. be revoked and you could be held in. custody in a house of correction without. bail. for up to 90 days or until. your trial. That includes any new. offenses that you may commit in that. period of time as well. With respect to Daniel Ferrante, bail. set in the amount of $25,000 cash.

The conditions if he should make that. bail are that he's to have no contact. and stay away with the complaining. witness, surrender his passport, remain in. Massachusetts, surrender any firearms. Sir, you as well if you commit a new. offense or you violate any of those. conditions of your release, your release. could be revoked and you could be held. in custody in a house of correction. without bail for up to 90 days or until. the time of your trial. So Pelrine. Ferrante both posted their bonds. They. left the courthouse together. Local. reporters as you can imagine just.

swarmed them asked for the reactions to. the allegations but their attorneys. basically said no comment. The judge. also impounded all documents related to. the case until at least April 30th so. they're going to remain sealed for now. Not surprising when you're dealing with. accusations regarding a then minor and. the two are back in court on June 8th. But that's all we have for you right now. here on Sidebar everybody. Thank you so. much for joining us and as always, please subscribe on YouTube, Apple. Podcast, Spotify, wherever you should. get your podcast. You can also check us. out on NBC's [music] Peacock as well. We. got episodes up there. If you want to. follow me X Instagram, my NewsNation.

show Jesse Weber live Monday [music]. through Friday 11:00 p.m. Eastern. See. you next time everybody.