DETAILS: Unsealed docs in OJ Simpson murder case reveal SHOCKING link

PROSTATE CANCER. THE MURDER WEAPON WAS NEVER. FOUND AND THE L.A.P.D. TELLS ME. THE CASE IS STILL OPEN. >> Sandra: WOW. ERIC, THANK YOU. JOHN? >> John: ALL RIGHT. IT IS A LONG AND INTRIGUING. INVESTIGATION. TO GO DEEPER ON THIS, LET'S. BRING IN PROFESSOR ALAN. DERSHOWITZ. PROFESSOR, ALWAYS GOOD TO HAVE. YOU ON THE PROGRAM. ONE POINT IN THIS VERY LENGTHY. INVESTIGATION IT GOES BACK TO. WHEN OJ WAS TALKING TO HIS GHOST. WRITER ABOUT HIS THEORETICAL. BOOK "IF I DID IT.". THE NEW YORK TIMES SAID, YOU. KNOW I COULDN'T HAVE DONE THIS.

ALONE, OJ BEGAN. IN THE STORY HE TOLD DAY, HE. DESCRIBED A VERSION OF THE 1994. MURDERS OF NICOLE BROWN SIMPSON. AND RONALD GOLDMAN IN WHICH. MR. SIMPSON HAD HELP FROM A. FRIEND WHO GOT RID OF THE MURDER. WEAPON AND MR. SIMPSON'S BLOODY. CLOTHES. AS ERIC SHAWN WAS POINTING OUT. THE MICROSCOPE IS LOOKING AT. JOEY IPPOLITO. WHAT DO YOU SAY? >> WELL, I THINK THIS IS AN OPEN. CASE.

I DON'T THINK WE HAVE A. DEFINITIVE RESOLUTION HERE. WHAT HAPPENED IS THE PROSECUTION. GOT SO GLOMMED ON TO A THEORY. THAT WHERE THEY ENHANCE THE. EVIDENCE OF THAT THEORY THAT. THEY DIDN'T LOOK TO OTHER. POSSIBILITIES. CERTAINLY IS A POSSIBILITY THAT. HE DIDN'T ACT ALONE. CERTAINLY A POSSIBILITY THAT. THIS GUY COULD HAVE DISPOSED OF. THE WEAPON. WE STILL DON'T KNOW WHERE THE. WEAPON IS.

THIS SHOULD BE LOOKED AT. THIS IS NOT A CLOSED CASE. PEOPLE SAY WE WON THE CASE. WE DIDN'T WIN THE CASE. THE PROSECUTION LOST IT. THEY MADE EVERY MISTAKE IN THE. BOOK. NOW THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY. PERHAPS TO GO BACK AND SEE. WHETHER POSSIBLY THERE'S MORE. EVIDENCE THAT COULD CLOSE THE. CASE FINALLY. >> Sandra: WELCOME BACK TO THE. PROGRAM. GOOD TO SEE YOU. THIS ACCOUNT OF AN ACCOMPLICE. SOME ARE POINTING OUT DOES BEAR.

STRIKING SIMILARITIES TO OJ. SIMPSON'S OWN BOOK "IF I DID. IT.". IF THAT BOOK HE GAVE A. HYPOTHETICAL ACCOUNT OF AN. ACCOMPLICE WHO HELPED HIM. DISPOSE OF THE WEAPON. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT? >> OJ SIMPSON WAS REALLY A JERK. AND THE IDEA THAT HE WROTE A. BOOK CALLED "IF I DID IT" WHEN. HE WAS CLAIMING HIS INNOCENCE IS. ABSURD. BUT IF HE DID SUGGEST THE.

POSSIBILITY OF AN ACCOMPLICE, THAT SURELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN. LOOKED INTO, AND SHOULD STILL BE. LOOKED INTO. I DON'T REGARD THIS AS A CLOSED. CASE. I THINK THIS IS STILL AN OPEN. INVESTIGATION. TRAGICALLY, EVERYBODY WHO WAS. DIRECTLY INVOLVED IS DEAD. BUT THEY HAVE THEIR CLAIMS. THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS NOT. SATISFIED WITH THE VERDICT IN. THIS CASE, AND IT'S. UNDERSTANDABLE. THERE ARE A LOT OF QUESTIONS. THAT HAVE BEEN LEFT UNRESOLVED. BY THE INADEQUACY OF THE.

PROSECUTION IN THE CASE. >> John: PROFESSOR DERSHOWITZ, "NEW YORK TIME" REPORTS IPPOLITO. APPARENTLY BROUGHT A LOT OF. INFORMATION TO FEDERAL. AUTHORITIES ABOUT OJ SIMPSON AND. HIS POTENTIAL INVOLVEMENT IN THE. MURDERS. BUT THE PROSECUTION IN THE CASE, CHRIS DARDEN AND MARCIA CLARK, SAY THAT INFORMATION NEVER MADE. IT TO THEM. APPARENTLY THEY ALREADY RESTED. THEIR CASE. "THE TIMIMES" REACHED OUT TO. DARDEN AND CLARK.

MR. DARDEN DENIED TO COMMENT. MS. CLARK SAID SHE HAD NO NEW. JERSEY OF MR. IPPOLITO. IF ANYONE FOUND TO HAVE HAD. RELEVANT AND CREDIBLE. INFORMATION, I SURELY WOULD HAVE. BEEN INFORMED, SHE SAID. THE FACT I WAS NEVER INFORMED. ESTABLISHES THE FACT HE HAD NO. CREDIBLE OR RELEVANT EVIDENCE TO. PROVIDE. DEFENSE TEAM, INCLUDED YOU, HAD. MAINTAINED POINTS IN THE TRIAL. THAT, HEY, THERE'S EVIDENCE THAT. A SECOND PERSON WAS THERE AT THE. TIME OF THE MURDERS.

>> YEAH. YOU KNOW, CLARK'S NOTION THAT IF. IT HAD BEEN RELEVANT SHE'D KNOW. ABOUT IT, AND BECAUSE SHE WASN'T. TOLD THAT IT ISN'T RELEVANT IS. ABSURD. IT MAY BE VERY RELEVANT. IT SEEMS PLAUSIBLE AND PERHAPS. CREDIBLE. MARCIA CLARK HAS NO REAL. STANDING TO BE INVOLVED IN THIS. BECAUSE SHE'S TRYING TO DEFEND. HER OWN INCOMPETENCE AND. INADEQUACY. DARDEN IS THE SAME. I THINK WE OUGHT TO START FROM. SCRATCH AND LOOK AT THIS. EVIDENCE ANEW AND SEE IF THERE.

IS CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF A SECOND. PERSON. I OFTEN, RIGHT FROM THE. BEGINNING, THOUGHT THIS WAS VERY. DIFFICULT FOR ONE PERSON TO. BROUGHT OFF. NOT ONLY KILL TWO PEOPLE, BUT. THEN DISPOSE OF THE EVIDENCE AND. DONE ALL THE THINGS THAT WE KNOW. OCCURRED IN THIS CASE. I REGARD THIS AS AN OPEN CASE. THERE'S NO POSSIBILITY, OBVIOUSLY, OF CONVICTING ANY.

PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ALL TO BE. GONE. WE OUGHT TO KNOW THE TRUTH. I THINK THIS OUGHT TO BE. INVESTIGATED AND PURSUED. I'M HAPPY TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY. WAY AND PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION. FROM OUR FILES BECAUSE WE'RE NOT. PROTECTING THE CLIENT ANYMORE. WE'RE SEEKING THE TRUTH. >> Sandra: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.