BREAKING NEWS: Brian Harpole Sues Me! | Candace Ep 331

All right, you guys. Man oh man, so much. to unpack today. First and foremost, I. woke up this morning and I was highly. upset. I had a little bit of a yesterday news. hangover. I realized that I'm actually. so not okay with what Erica Kirk did. She essentially put a target on my back. by wrongly asserting that I accused her. of murdering her husband. I don't think. we can let that fly, right? No, her. punishment is going to be more truth. What do we say? She is sentenced to more.

truth, and I have been keeping a little. secret, and it's time for me to reveal. it. Also, I am getting the sense that there. is something happening, something big. happening. It feels like people are. upping the crazy a little bit. Something. is coming undone in the background. And on that note, the big news of the. day is guess who crawled from under his. rock, apparently, and sent me a. full-blown lawsuit. Yes, Brian Harpold. Ladies and gentlemen, I believe that.

that would grant me, your girl, the. power of subpoena. Let's get started. Welcome back to. Candace. >> [music]. >> So, let me back up. I was standing in. Charlotte Airport about to board my. flight to Italy last week, and I.

received an email. Me and my lawyers. received an email. It was randomly sent. to us. It was something like a. retraction demand, but it wasn't. actually. a retraction demand because his lawyer, Brian Harpold's lawyer, asserted at the. top, right away, that they were already. going to file the lawsuit no matter what. in 4 days. This was kind of just a nice. heads-up that these are our claims that. we will be making. What? How curious. What do you mean? This is.

You never communicated with me, you. never spoke, you never issued any sort. of retraction demand, you never answered. me when I reached out. This is not at. all how it normally goes. I mean, I'm. I'm pretty accustomed to how lawsuits. work. In fact, I can tell you it's never. gone like this, ever, for me. You you. send, "Hey, that's what you said is not. right. Retract it, or else I am going to sue. you." Brian Harpold did no such thing. Okay. So, before I tell you why I believe he.

is doing this, and again, this is my. opinion, cuz this is a very curious. strategy, I'm going to at first take you. through some of the highlights of the. demand, which was poorly organized, but. it is really just kind of summarizes the. actual lawsuit which he has now filed. In other words, I want you to understand. he had the lawsuit prepared first before. he sent me this notification-type. demand, okay? >> [cough].

>> Pardon me. I also want to mention, because it feels. important, that. Brian Harpold is using the same lawyer. the Daily Wire used to sue me in. arbitration for 2 years straight. I'm. not going to name the firm, even though. the lawyer is publicly tweeting, and. also has a YouTube channel, so it's not. hard to find. But I will just say that's another. coincidence. I'm very tired of this guy altogether, mostly because he speaks like he's. consumed helium. Anyway, let's get into. Brian Harpold's the stated grievances,

okay? First up, he wants to sue me, he's suing. me for maligning him. when I suggested, uh well, when I stated. that not. having an ambulance on standby. is inappropriate. It's wrong. I am not. kidding, this is what was written. It reads, "In your podcast episode. titled Why is everyone crashing out over. the Charlie Kirk investigation, you. maligned Kirk's security team, including. Mr. Harpold, by stating, quote, In real.

life, when you spend millions of dollars. on security, on your security detail, they don't have you sitting like a duck. and forget to have an ambulance behind. you.". This statement not only incorrectly. calls into question the competence of. Mr. Harpold and his team, but it defames. Mr. Harpold by falsely accusing him and. his team of criminal negligence by. failing to render aid to Kirk after he. was shot. Okay, so. competence. is a matter of opinion, Brian. I I don't. believe you can sue people for thinking.

that you're stupid, or that you're ugly, or that you're fat. I don't believe I. can sue Trump for thinking Brigitte is. the most beautiful woman in the world, more beautiful than me, at the very. least, it's not even close, as he says. I don't think I can sue Trump for making. the repeated claim that he views me as. someone that is low IQ. So, I don't know. that you competence. is really a claim. Also, I would argue. that it is almost a matter of fact that. a security team that is paid many.

dollars annually. should have had an ambulance on standby. at an event, especially when it was a. part of their normal repertoire to do. so. Is everybody forgetting. I used to work with Turning Point USA. I'm fairly certain that almost. probably at each and every one of my. many events that I have done with. Turning Point USA. during a time period when Brian Harpold. was always a member of the security. team, we had an ambulance on standby. So, this That actually felt exceptional.

to me. It is not my opinion. that it is my opinion that not having. one on standby, especially when the. person that you are providing executive. protection to, texts you guys the night before and. says, "I think I'm going to be killed.". It's my It's my opinion that it. demonstrates professional incompetence. not to have an ambulance on standby in. case anything happens. Sorry, Brian. Um I most certainly did not accuse you. of criminal negligence. That term did. not come from this podcast. In fact, I. hadn't even thought of that term until.

you put it all over a lawsuit. So, we. should just look that up and see what. the definition is. I did. It says definition of criminal. negligence is a reckless disregard for. human life or a gross deviation from the. standard of care that a reasonable. person would observe, resulting in. serious harm or death. Okay, unlike civil negligence, it is a. crime prosecuted by the state, often. leading to imprisonment, involuntary. manslaughter charges, or major felonies, okay? Thank you for introducing us to.

that legal term, Brian. What else is Brian upset about? Well, I would argue that the next point. actually demonstrates incompetence, okay? Brian wants to sue me for. something that I literally never said. about him. Mind you, this was actually. the very first point of the letter. It. was dizzying. It reads, uh. it is. In your podcast episode titled Charlie's. Angels or Demons, you implied that Charlie Kirk's security. team, including Mr. Harpold, had insider.

knowledge about Kirk's assassination. Specifically, you questioned how the. security team knew that Charlie Kirk was. dead before official confirmation. The false and defamatory nature of the. statement is obvious, as it implies that. Mr. Harpold and his security team had. only had foreknowledge of the. assassination, but were also complicit. in it. Um. want to know the truth? In that particular episode, we never mentioned Brian Harpold or.

referred to him even once. The episode, as it implies, is about. specifically Charlie's chief of staff. and Terrell Farnsworth, the head of the. AV team. The specific quotation to which. he's referring to is about Terrell. Farnsworth, because it was Terrell. Farmsworth who notoriously. announced in a selfie video that Charlie. Kirk was dead like 2 minutes after. Charlie went down, so when no one could. have possibly known Charlie was dead, okay? My full quotation, which for some. reason is not included, uh was, "What.

were Charlie's closest friends and. allies and the people that were going to. carry on the torch at Turning Point USA. doing?" Oh, they were picking up phone. calls, like Mikey McCoey. They were. already filming themselves prematurely. announcing Charlie is dead, when not a. single person could have known that. Charlie Kirk was dead. End quote. That. is a factual quotation referring to the. immediate actions taken by Mikey McCoey. and Terrell Farnsworth. Thank you, Brian. Hope that clears that matter up. What. else do you have? Hmm, it looks like.

this next one is a bit of a double. punch. He wants to sue me for describing his. outfit foremost, you'll see. And then he wants to sue me for having. ears and a general sense of of. comprehension, I guess. Like I'm able. I'm able to comprehend the words that. are coming out of people's mouths. I took notice that, as many people did, that there were conflicting statements. made by Turning Point USA. on that day. Now, there may be a valid. excuse for those discrepancies in.

messaging. However, you cannot punish. the public for noticing them, okay? I'm. referring to the drones. So, that this this reads this claim. reads, "In your podcast episode entitled. The Great Exodus from Utah, you again falsely claimed that Mr. Harpold failed to render aid to Kirk. after he was shot, but this time, you. incorrectly claimed that Harpold failed. to render effective aid to Kirk with his. supposed-to-be medical bag.". Okay. Later in the episode, you falsely.

accused Mr. Harpold of lying about drone. availability, asking, "Is that how these. assassinations happen?". Together, these statements defame Mr. Harpold by accusing him of being a. direct cause of Kirk's assassination. Mr. Harpold did not play a role in. Kirk's assassination and did everything. he could to render aid and assist Kirk. after he was shot. Okay, so to address. that obscure medical bag claim, the full. quotation from my episode is just a mere. description of Brian Harpold and his. medical bag. I said exactly, quote, Brian is the one who then runs over to.

Charlie and again you recognize him. because he kind of has that uh small. supposed to be medical bag over him. I'm completely confused as to how that. description isn't anyway defamatory. I. just wanted to alert viewers to the fact. that he was not just wearing a man purse. and it was. supposed to be a medical bag. That's it. [laughter]. Now, regarding the drones, Brian. Harpole's statement flew in direct. contradiction to the statements that was. given by Frank Turek, okay? That's. confusing for the public. Take a listen.

I spent thousands of dollars on drones. last year. And one of and got the guy's license, but. if the area lies in the Provo, Utah. airspace, I can't fly. That's a 107B that got we can't break. the rules. Right? And then you had secondary. restrictions probably due to heavy foot. traffic for the school, but I I can't go. in and break the rules. Anyway, on our way in, we had drone. footage. of the crowd building.

And um. had Charlie had it on his phone. I said, "Charlie, I don't like this place. There are too. many buildings.". Charlie just kind of brushed it off. because. look, we have a security team. and he wasn't going to cancel an event. So, we're driving in, Megan, and his. team has drones up. um looking at the crowd from above and. they they text him some video. And. there's thousands of people there an. hour before.

the the start and I said, "Charlie, I don't like this place. There's too. many buildings.". Now, again, there there very much could. be a a clear reason as to why these. statements are conflicting. Um but you can't be mad at the public. for noticing that the statements are. conflicting. Also, did anybody actually. fact-check Brian Harpole's earlier. points? As I did. Um he says, "Well, I. can't break the rules." Um you can't fly. drones in Provo airspace. Well, I.

actually spoke to someone regarding that. who has good knowledge of the rules. regarding Provo airspace and he said, "Yeah, you can't fly in Provo airspace. meaning around airports. You would have. to get clearance. You can't fly uh near. hangars. But you can fly drones in. Provo." So, his his whole excuse of why. he didn't even bring drones. we should we should probably take a. second glance at. Again, this is. according to a pilot who I know who's in. charge of drone training. So, a lot.

doesn't seem to be adding up there. You. can clarify that, but you can't pretend. that someone tried to defame you uh. unless you're going to go after Frank. Turek. Anyway, let's let's actually pivot to. the lawsuit because it is remarkable, okay? The lawsuit itself is 69 pages and. for some. unknown reason, he begins the lawsuit. and I'm talking like the first few pages. with. strong support for Israel. I guess. that's mandatory. Candace is. anti-Semitic. I'm just even though Brian. Harpole is not Jewish, I am not Jewish,

Charlie was not Jewish. He mentions this. it just kind of sporadically in a. paragraph where he's painting this. picture that I'm a conspiracy theorist. They also mention uh we can bring this. up here on uh on point 19 that I I I. don't believe the moon landing. Guilty as charged. Guilty as charged. I I think the moon. landing was fake. I'm not sure what this. has to do with anything if I'm required. to believe the moon landing is real, but. he just kind of mentions that and then. you know, you you got to have that.

random strong support for Israel right. at the top, which is why also embedded. is the mandatory picture of Bibi. Netanyahu. You got to let these people. know where you stand on Israel before. you even get into uh the substance of a. lawsuit. So, I appreciate that preamble. That's just called our standard. constitutional preamble. Um you know, he's with Israel. Okay, cool. I I'm. going to do that when I when I respond. and say, "I just want you to know, I. love Israel." Just saying that. Um.

And now I want to draw your attention to. the obscure argument that he is making. So, just pages and pages of him just. kind of painting a picture of who I am. But he he comes out and kind of makes. this obscure argument that he is a. private citizen, okay? That's point 29. He's trying to assert that he is a. private citizen. Now, let's take a look at this. It des-. Despite two podcast appearances, Harpole. remains a private individual and not a. limited purpose public figure. He has. social media accounts that he's he does. not use for posting content. He has no.

public platforms to effectively rebut or. counteract statements. And his. involvement in the controversy is. limited to two defensive appearances. He. did not seek publicity or attempt to. influence public debate. Huh? I'm sorry. First of all, why is he doing. that? That's very important. Let's get. Let's get to why he is trying to assert. that I I I know I went on Sean Ryan, but. I'm I'm a private citizen. That's. because he doesn't want to have to meet. the actual malice standard, right? You're a public figure, you have to meet.

the actual malice standard. You meaning. you have to prove that I knowingly. published something uh that was false. and that I did it and acted in total. disregard to the truth. I knew what the. truth was and I said, "I don't care. I'm. going to publish this." It's a hard. standard to meet. Uh that would be in in my view for Brian. to to assert that he's not a public. figure here, that would be hard because. Brian did actually go and pursue not. just any podcast, okay? One of the top.

podcasts in the world, the Sean Ryan. podcast, and he opened himself up. What is the law on the books when you do. that? The rule is that private citizens. can indeed become limited purpose public. figures when they voluntarily. thrust themselves into the forefront of. a particular public controversy to. influence its outcome. In such cases, they are considered public figures only. for the context of that specific issue. and for a limited time. That's exactly.

what Brian Harpole did. Okay? He went and he's going to argue. why he did it defensively. You went on a public platform and you. gave information about what the security. did. All these questions that were being. asked and you're you're going to claim, which he does, this is wild, that the. reason he went on Sean Ryan, this is. crazy to me. He is saying that the. reason he went on Sean Ryan. was because of me. That is that is that is beyond, okay?

Let's look at this point 28. On November 17th, after Owens and other. conspiracy theorists had already. implicated Harpole and his team in the. assassination, Harpole appeared on the. Sean Ryan show solely to respond to and. to rebut the defamatory statements. I'm sorry, what? That's going to be a. tricky one to prove in court considered. I never once mentioned Brian Harpole on. my show until after he went on Sean. Ryan. Literally, not once did I mention.

Brian Harpole's name on my podcast. I mentioned his name 2 days after he. went on Sean Ryan and it was in direct. response to his disastrous appearance on. Sean Ryan. His appearance was on. November 17th. The first time I. mentioned him on this show was on. November 19th. In other words, uh you. elected yourself as a spokesperson for. the security team thereby making. yourself a public figure and I responded. to it, okay? Here's where it gets even crazier. though, him pretending that I was a part. of the early conspiracies against him.

I did not believe the early conspiracies. against Brian Harpole. Okay, not only that, I went through. great lengths to defend both Brian. Harpole and Dan Flood without mentioning. their names cuz I didn't want the public. to find them. when all the early conspiracies started. flying. Specifically, the conspiracies. were about hand signals, you remember? Frank Turek's doing hand signals. It. looks like Dan Flood's doing hand. signals. It looks like Brian Harpole is. doing hand signals behind his back and. they're all looped in. I didn't believe. it. I genuinely didn't believe it. I. didn't believe any of these people had.

anything to do with anything cuz I knew. Turning Point. And so, I spoke to Andrew. Kolvet on the phone about how I did not. believe any of that. And Andrew asked me. if I would be willing to say something. publicly on my podcast to that effect. because they were getting hammered and I. said, "Of course I will." These are. these are good guys. Here is the text. message that I sent to Andrew Kolvet. following that discussion on the phone. I said, "Also, yes, I will say something. about the security. I know them well.". Which is why I never bought into people. saying that he was making signals. And.

guess what I did, guys? On that very. same day in September, on this podcast, I defended the security team and then. Dan Flood and said that they were good. people. Here are my words. I know there's a lot of conspiracy. theories floating in about the security. guard and people thinking he was making. gestures. I know that security person. He's a good guy. It would shock me. I. usually get a vibe about somebody. Not that guy. Not the guy that they say.

he's like rolling up. He He tends to do. that, roll up his sleeves. I don't I. don't buy that one, okay? I don't buy. that one. Wow. You're saying you went on you went on. Sean Ryan because of things that I was. saying. And that's what I was saying. Again, it was because of his behavior. and what he said on Sean Ryan's show, which I found to be unconvincing, which. is he's suing me for saying that that. interview was unconvincing, uh which made me feel weird and take a. second look. This has been a very. natural process for me. I did not come.

into this uh guns a-blazing, so to. speak, against Turning Point USA. And uh to to get to this bigger part, uh. this really feels to me like one big PR. booth, okay? It feels like he's kind of trying to. pull the Blake Lively. He he to make the. claim uh that he's not a public figure. and that's specifically because a large. chunk of his claims are pertaining to. Mitch Snow, who he is also suing by the. way.

And what is not helpful to his claims. to sue me and Mitch Snow is a fact that. I reached out to Brian Harpole. personally before. I featured Mitch Snow on this podcast, okay? So, the story goes that on November 8th, I had first mentioned that there was. someone. who thought that they saw Brian Harpole. at Fort Huachuca that I, you know, examined the person's documents, whatever. I found him to be credible as. in I believe he said where he was where.

he said he was when when he said he was. It was a solo episode on December 9th. and if you recall, it caused mass panic. So, I was intending to interview Mitch. Snow and then craziness started, right? Erica Kirk did her stop just stop tour. She's out there saying stop stop. Privately, I was effectively being. threatened behind the scenes not to. speak to Mitch Snow. They knew I wanted. to interview him and someone reached out. to me. and this was coming through Paramount. Tactical and the Valhalla guy and they.

were saying, "If you do this if if you. interview Mitch, Mitch wasn't even in. the military. He like they're running. different directions. He's a complete. fraud. He's never been to Fort Huachuca. and if you actually interview Mitch, Brian Harpole where he's going to sue. you." That's what came down the pipeline. to me. So, before I even got to do the. interview, Brian Harpole was telling people to say. that if I interview this guy, I'm going. to sue you. I thought that was. completely deranged. I said, "Well, this. is crazy. Brian Harpole has my number. Why is he sending out these random.

YouTubers? Um I I he he knows who I am. I've. defended him as podcast." So, I reached. out to him before we hosted Mitch Snow. uh to get his fuller story and to say, "Hey, you are you welcome to tell me. that you just weren't there. Like what. what's up? We don't have to like I don't. I don't want to host this guy. Like why. are you being all weird?" I asked him. then beyond that if he wanted to clarify. anything. I sent Brian Harpole I think a. total of four messages and I also sent. Dan Flood a message. Again, from the day before I uh or 2.

days before I interviewed Mitch Snow. through to January trying to get him to. just say yes or no. And he actually, remarkably, embeds these many messages. to him. um in the lawsuit. And that's going to. be point 54 to 55. He just embeds these. into the lawsuits. "Hi Brian, this is Candace Owens. A lot. of people are telling me that you're. planting seeds regarding a lawsuit. I. wanted to see if you wanted to have an. off-record discussion with me about.

anything or if you'd like to simply. clarify something that you think that I. got wrong." You can see I followed up on. December 19th. Um. I I I. "Hi Brian, just again reaching out in. case you want to clarify your. whereabouts on the morning of September. 9th. I'm only interested in the truth. So, I would be happy to debunk Mitch if. he perhaps is misremembering the faces. that he saw." No response. Um I think they also put a third message. in there. I don't know if they if he if. you can scroll and see that um or if. that's not attached yet, but we like I.

said multiple messages that I sent him, he just didn't answer. So, w-. why? Why didn't Brian Harpole simply respond? Why didn't you send a cease and desist a. long time ago? Why didn't you ask me for. a retraction? Here's another one. "Hey. Brian, reaching out again to see if. you'd be willing to speak about the. morning of the 9th. I'm obviously not. trying to do anything other than debunk. Mitch. so I can pivot and refocus the. investigation, but I oddly cannot get. you to confirm or deny if you were. there.". He's acknowledging he received these.

messages and he chose not to respond. Again, why? Well, lucky for us, he's. going to explain it in the lawsuit and. this is the wildest point of all. It's. actually insane it's an insane reason. In my view, it's insane to assert that. this is the reason that you did not. respond to my three messages to you, one. message to Dan Flood. This is his point. number 50. Ready? Um sorry, point number 59 I think it is. Here we go. "Owens soon texted Harpole a third time.

asking again if he would like to speak. about the events that transpired on the. morning of September 9th. Owens. concluded concluded her text message by. stating that she found it odd that she. could not get Harpole to confirm or deny. his location on the morning of September. 9th. Owens already knew why Harpole. didn't respond. Her repeated texts to Harpole to get him. to respond to the defamatory conspiracy. theories that she had been promoting. present a cynical attempt to profit from.

a situation. that she had manufactured by spreading. defamatory lies about Harpole and then. coddling him to give her the exclusive. content of a response, she stood to. profit from increased attention and. viewership to her platform. at Harpole's expense.". So, he didn't reply with a yes or no. because he didn't want to give me an. exclusive yes or no. because then I would have made money on.

my platform. Um I didn't ask you for an. exclusive. It would have put an end to me covering. the story beyond. So, actually by not. responding before I hosted Mitch, it. didn't allow me didn't stop me from. hosting Mitch. Um you also could have. told Sean Ryan. you could have said, "Hey, Sean Ryan, I'm I'm going to come on your platform. cuz I don't want Candace to to make any. money saying yes or no. I don't want to. give her this exclusive content. We're supposed to believe that's the.

reason? Were we born yesterday? That's the. reason? You didn't want me to make money so you. said, "I'm just going to be so stressed. out. I'm never going to say anything to. her.". This is in December. I'm actually going. to wait until April. and then in April, I'm going to say I'm. not I'm just filing a lawsuit. I'm just. filing a lawsuit. That doesn't seem That doesn't ring. true. That does not ring very true. Now, another interesting point of the lawsuit.

is he repeatedly claims that he's upset. that I described him as having lied, okay? Well, you certainly lied by severe omission by. not letting the viewers know that the. text messages that you were presenting. on Sean Ryan were not between you and. the UVU Police Chief Long, right? Like. when people were going, "Why didn't you. secure the rooftops?" You presented this. text chain as if it was yours. In fact, you explicitly say I. In the implication being that this is. the reason. I did not secure the rooftops. This text.

message is the reason. Take a listen to. what he said. On Monday before. this correspondence went to Chief Long. "Hello Chief Long, I received this message today from the. student group. Um there is a student. roof access pretty close to where CK. will be set up at the Utah Valley. Uh the Sorensen uh center has a couple. of staircases that go up to walkways on. the roofs.". He comes back and the Sorensen.

for identification, the Sorensen center. was the building in front of the Lucy. center. And so, he and he comes back he says, "You want access to the roof.". And came back and said, "Uh I was told students have access. above us. If this is true, it would be. nice to either have it controlled access. or allow one of my guys to be there as. well if possible.". He comes back and his last.

correspondence was, "I got you covered.". What else am I to do? When a command level. uh person from an accredited police. department says, "I've got this area.". What else am I to do? He is heavily implying that. I did what I had to do. I texted him. He.

said he had it covered. What else am I. to do? And then we revealed on the show. that he those aren't even his messages. Those are Dan Flood's messages and he. admits that finally in this lawsuit that. those are Dan Flood's messages. That was. not an honest presentation to say, "What. else am I supposed to do?". If you were not even on that text chain. So, yeah, I view that to be a. a lie by severe omission. I think the. average person a jury pool will say, "Yeah, no, that sounds like you were.

involved in this text chain and your. excuse for why you did not secure the. rooftops was because of this text. chain." You never said, "Dan got these. messages. Here's what Dan said back.". And what is so shocking. about this is that. throughout this lawsuit, he explicitly. lies that the lawyer explicitly lies in. this filing by claiming. that I asserted over and over again that. that Snow that Mitch Snow was telling. the truth about Harpole when in fact,

no, I went through a great many pains to. repeatedly assert publicly that I could. not confirm that he saw Harpole, okay? Here is just one of many examples on my. podcast. This is actually when I. interviewed Mitch Snow where I said, "I. can't confirm who you saw. Take a. listen.". And I want to be clear. I can confirm. on this podcast live every step of your. story in terms of where you went, what. time you were there, um that there was this big meeting that. happened. I confirmed the location with.

other people that are that are on uh. Fort Huachuca currently. I can confirm. everything with metadata. Um I obviously can't confirm that you. saw who you say you saw. I obviously can't confirm. that you saw who you say you saw. And I I said I said it repeatedly And. even in this filing, in his own legal. filing, Brian's lawyer accuses me of. confirming Mitch's claim, while in the. very next paragraph he presents proof. that I didn't confirm Mitch's claim. This is 0.63. I mean, this lawsuit is a.

dizzying read. He says, on December 23rd, Owens posted. to X, Fort Huachuca confirmed. The body. of the post claimed that she had proof. that Snow was telling the truth about. Harpole. And contained a screenshot of what Owens. claims to be the incident report from. Snow's visit to Fort Huachuca. Did he. read my post? My post right here says, Find your favorite podcaster who joined. the psychological operation to convince. you that Mitch was lying about having.

been at Fort Huachuca. Remember, Mitch. said he was at first taken outside by. Captain Neff and questioned for a long. time. I then recap what happened. I said. I always believed Mitch's story of what. happened on that morning because he. supplied overwhelming evidence with. metadata and timestamps. Now we have the. incident report. What we cannot confirm. as of yet is his memory of who he is. convinced he saw coming out of that. early morning meeting. We cannot confirm.

Matt Slauson. We cannot confirm. What is this? What is this? What are we to make of all. of this? What are we to make of this. filing? What do you think is the purpose. of this filing? I will I'll give you my. thoughts, my questions rather. I can't. know what is going on behind the scenes. I think it the timing of this is strange. like I said, the strategy here to never. actually ask me to retract, to never. present any evidence.

to the contrary. Uh hey Candace, here's uh my receipt. I. was getting a Starbucks at 9:00 a.m. I. was therefore not at Fort Huachuca or. getting a Starbucks at 7:30 when you. said meeting was happening. Could I do that? Never did this, okay? I. can tell you though via my experience. with defamation. is that there are a lot of lawsuits that. are filed because people don't. understand that what you put in a. lawsuit filing is not always true as I. just demonstrated to you, right? You can.

write whatever you want and people tend. to take everything that's filed as a. fact. They just go, oh well, like case. in point, Brigitte said I was a dual. citizen of the UK. Suddenly people start. saying I'm a dual I'm not a dual citizen. of the UK. It's not a fact. Okay? You. can you can just put stuff in a lawsuit. And I have seen. over and over again examples of people. filing lawsuits as PR strategies. I. lived that with the Kim Klacik lawsuit. I said. uh she was a former stripper, blah blah. she said I'm not, so she files this.

lawsuit and then says, this is proof. that it's not true cuz I'm I'm filing a. lawsuit. And people then suddenly, oh. well, it must be true. She's filing a. lawsuit. So and then what ended up. happening was she took it to discovery. and then she folded. Right? She folded and wanted to sign an. agreement and say, let's let's walk away. and not talk about it when we started. presenting the evidence. of the strippers that worked with her. and knew her. It was like, okay, actually this was. just meant to be a PR thing actually and. so I could keep claiming that this.

wasn't true. I've seen that happen before, okay? Is this that? Is this someone going, I just want to be. able to get people to think that by. filing this lawsuit means I'm telling. the truth. I'm saying in this lawsuit. that I wasn't at Fort Huachuca. Why else would I file a lawsuit? That. means you now everybody can just let the. Fort Huachuca story go cuz I said it. Like I said that Candace said things. that she didn't say, like I asserted that Candace was a part.

of the early conspiracies when actually. the exact opposite thing is true. I'm. just going to put stuff in here and I'm. going to hand it to journalists, which. is what they do, and journalists are. going to publish this and say, ah, proof, proof. Proof that he wasn't at Fort Huachuca. cuz why else would he file a lawsuit? But maybe there's an expectation. that it's never going to make it through. the court system, that you're never. actually going to have to present any. proof of anything. Because the judge is going to look at. this and go, no. She asked you multiple times. This.

is I'm going to throw this away. Is that the expectation? Again, I'm. asking questions here. This feels weird to me. The strategy. here feels weird to me. You're dealing. with a lawyer that has full access to my. lawyers in the state of Tennessee, has. been in communication with them for 2. years. He never raises a single issue. until the end of April? And then says, doesn't matter or we're. filing a lawsuit. Is this a PR move? And. if it is, how do we respond to it? Well,

I obviously just received this lawsuit a. couple of hours ago and I am not. therefore. at liberty to assert what we will or. will not do because I have to speak with. my husband and I haven't had the time. to. you know, formally plead my case with. him so to speak. What I will say is how. many opportunities are we going to have? Are we ever going to have another. opportunity to force depositions? Are we ever going to have an opportunity. to have the power of subpoena? He's. making claims that he rendered first.

aid. This would give us the opportunity. to then say, oh, Terrell Farnsworth. actually has footage the public has. never seen from every angle. We can now. take a look. We want to see this footage. and subpoena this footage. so that we can see what happened on the. ground if you are asserting that you did. provide critical aid. Will we ever have. an opportunity. to do this ever again? Can we look at this situation where. you're you're you're saying, oh, this. this conspiracy, all these people are.

involved. You're bringing up Terrell. Farnsworth, Mikey McCormick. You're. bringing up these episodes where we. discussed Erica. Can we now sit these people for a. deposition? Can we now demand. these. text messages? He's saying there's no. conspiracy here. Can we now say, okay, well, we'd like to discover that. We'd like to actually look at all of the. evidence and be able to come up with an. argument and we're going to need we're. going to need access. We're going to. need access to everybody's text messages. if that's what you are asserting. If you. are saying that I have defamed you and.

you are a part of the Turning Point USA. brand. You're saying you're mentioning Erica. Kirk. Is this the only. plausible path that we will have before. us. to get Erica Kirk to sit for. deposition? To answer basic questions that we've. been asking for actually a very long. time. If that's the claim that you are. making. regarding there being no conspiracy. Is the power of subpoena actually going.

to be our only way? I'd like to hear your guys' positions on. this, but. um. I'm have never been doing this for fun. Charlie Kirk is dead. We have been told. a lot of lies, um a lot of inconsistent stories from. the people that are around him. They are. I would say especially in this last. month, there seems to be sort of a. ramped up effort to attack people who.

have been asking for the truth in a. reasonable fashion over and over again. extending uh. messages to Brian. Hey, come on the show. if you'd like to. I didn't actually even. ask him to come on the show. I said you. could just tell me what the truth is and. I'll report on that. And they don't want to do that. You don't jump and skip and then file a. lawsuit. That's not normal. That is. abnormal. That's not the normal trend. People. genuinely want to not have the wrong. information out there. So they ask you to retract the. statements that you are making.

Something's not right here. I get a sense that this this feels like, well, we tried to answer about Fort Huachuca. It was a very serious lawsuit, but. defamation's hard. That's that was what. Kim Klacik said. Defamation's hard. So that's what that's why I filed a. lawsuit feel, but as you can see, I'm. telling the truth because I filed the. lawsuit. I think we have to think on this. Um. I have to talk to my husband. I I do think that's this really may be. the only opportunity that anybody who.

deeply cares. about this case and genuinely wants. truth will have. to be able to subpoena that information. The power of subpoena. is well, it's it's a power. It is a tool and I'm I've only ever been. interested in getting to the truth. of what happened to Charlie Kirk on. September 10th. So we will pause there. and then I will break some news to you. guys after this brief break.

All right, you guys, time flies faster. than we expect, but when it comes to. your goals like building credit, it's. never too late to start making real. progress. Kick off is the number one. credit building app in the app store. with plans starting at just $5 a month. There's no credit check, no hidden fees, and absolutely no interest. In fact, users starting with credit under 600 see. an average increase of 86 points just by. making on-time payments. And here's how. it works. You make your payments, Kick. Off reports that positive activity to. the credit bureaus, and your credit can. grow really fast. They even offer rent. reporting, so the payments that you're.

already making can help build your. credit as well. You can sign up in. minutes right from your phone, and with. auto pay, you'll never miss a payment. Join over a million users building. better credit the smart way. Start. building credit with Kick Off today and. get your first month for as little as. $1. That's 80% off the normal price when. you go to getkickoff.com/candace. today. Again, that's Kick Off without. the C, so it's kikoff.com/candace. Must sign up at kickoff.com/candace to. activate offer. Offer applies to new. Kick Off customers first month only,

subject to approval. Offer subject to. change. Average first-year credit score. impact of plus 86 points between August. 2024 and August 2025 for Kick Off credit. account users who started with a score. below 600, who paid on time, and who had. no delinquencies or collections added to. their credit profile during the period. Late payments may negatively impact your. credit score. Individual results may. vary. Also, remind you guys about American. Financing because the cost of living is. not just high, it is exhausting. If. you've been leaning on credit cards. lately just to cover the basics like. grocery, gas, and utility bills, you're. essentially paying a survival tax of 20%. interest or more. Why keep handing your. hard-earned paycheck to the big banks.

when you could keep it for your family. instead? My friends at American. Financing have a better way. They're. helping homeowners tap into their equity. to pay off high-interest debt with. mortgage rates currently in the fives. On average, American Financing is saving. their customers $800 a month. That's. nearly 10,000 a year back in your. pocket. It's not just a loan, it's a. total financial reset. It takes just 10. minutes to find out what you could be. saving. There are no upfront fees and no. obligation to talk to a salary-based. mortgage consultant. And here's the. kicker, if you start today, you could. even delay two mortgage payments.

American Financing is America's home for. home loans. So, call American Financing. today at 800-795-1210. Again, that's 800-795-1210. or simply visit. americanfinancing.net/owens. americanfinancing.net/owens. I can already hear the debate. I can I. can already. obviously I already know my husband's. points that he's going to make. He is. always very sensible about these things. He and I are wired differently. I may. have even told you guys with the guy. with the. little.

tap who then was like, "Oh, I'm going to. sue you." for a little fender bender. I. was like, "I would have fought that to. the end." And George's perspective is. sometimes just take the easy route. But. this is. this is different, I think. This is what. we have been fighting for for the last 7. months. George knew to Charlie. and. really respected him. They respected one. another. And I have been thrust into the public. and dealing with all of the smears, the.

attacks on me, my family, my employees. This might be the only window of. opportunity that we have. And I know lawsuits are expensive. That's the whole reason why they try to. discourage and they want you to always. take the path of least resistance. But. you know what? My life just hasn't been that way. anyway. I'm actually accustomed to it. So, anyway, moving on, I had to say at. the top that I sort of slept on this. this thing. Like yeah, first off, did do. you Are you getting the sense.

that it was kind of like all plotted and. planned for my birthday? Is this isn't a. weird thing? Like so much was happening. Yeah, the universe. It feels like everyone's. That's our day. April 29th, go for her. Go for her. First off, I and I also want. to let you guys know a little loophole. My priest does not watch this show. Okay, he is in London. So, I might be able to get away with not. chilling today a little bit. And I'm not. chilling actually cuz it was actually. unacceptable yesterday. And I'm going to. show you more of what happened. But of. course, the big news was Erica Kirk just.

coming out there and saying something. that was so obviously untrue. It was just so obviously untrue. Baron. Coleman recapped this perfectly on his. show last night. And he was wearing the. appropriate attire. Take a listen. So, we have a series of questions. Like if Erica wants to remain at the. helm, I think she has to be able to answer. some questions. Number one, why did you claim. Candace said.

that Erica killed Charlie. She's never. said it that I've seen. Oh, but bam bam bam, didn't you see the. text message where she said yeah, I saw. a text message where she was joking. around with a friend and she even put a. laughing face on it. I saw that. But no one assumed that's what you were. talking about, Erica. Not a single. person assumed that's what you were. talking about. It sounded very clear to me, and I think it did to everyone else cuz. everybody had the exact same reaction. that you that you what you were trying. to say in that moment today is that.

Candace goes on her podcast or goes to. speeches and she says, "I believe Erica. did it.". I'll be first to say I don't think Erica. did it. I don't think Erica. killed her husband. Nor do I know a single human being that. does. I've never talked to anyone who does. Talked to Candace, I've never heard her. say that. Talked to a lot of these other. podcasters, I've never heard anyone say. that.

No one who's ever been on this show has. ever said that. I've never said that on. this show. I don't know a single person who. believes Erica killed Charlie. Not one. So, what a weird thing to say. Why would. you even bother saying that? That's a good question, Baron. Why would. she bother saying that? It was just like. an attack from every angle yesterday. And and thankfully, the internet just. instantly rebounded and hit her in the. face. The ball just hit her right back.

in the face. Boomeranged, so to speak. Thankfully, they was everyone clocked. her on that. And then you had Andrew. with this ridiculous excuse. Has he yet released the full. conversation? The full conversation, the. context of that? Mocking that Ben. Shapiro and Barry Weiss? This No, this. is this is when you say it was a joke, it was private conversation. about what you were going to say. Leaning into what everyone was claiming. If you ask a single question, this is. you obviously you think Erica killed her.

husband. Now, let me at first also state. unequivocally that I do not believe that. Erica Kirk murdered her husband. I've. never made that claim in public. Sincerely, I've never made that claim. What I have said and what I stand by. today is that her documented lies appear. to me to be rising to a level of. conspiracy and that she should be. questioned. Okay? Her lack of interest. in exploring possible other options, instantly forgiving him, was there any. foreign influence? She doesn't she. doesn't care. Not only that, but like.

her team is attacking Joe Kent for. asking that question. Right? Her lying about Dr. Lee Trotter's. words. That is significant. You are. never going to remove that from the. story. Colluding with Andrew Kolbatz on. an absurd man of steel statement and. then flatly denying to my face that she. did that. Throwing Andrew Kolbatz and Dr. Lee. Trotter under the bus. Okay? That's not. normal. You're never going to make that. normal. Donors literally telling me that she is.

lying about the audio clip that she. presented at AmFest. The one that they now assert that they. are never going to show us the video. component regarding. Charlie Kirk saying, "Erica Kirk, I I. appoint my wife, Erica, to become the. CEO.". Donors saying that actually never went. down. He never said that. That is it is plainly unacceptable that. we have not yet received a response. They have not yet released the video to.

answer the claims being made by the. donors that were in attendance. Release. the video that you claim to have of. Charlie naming you CEO. Don't be shy. now. Okay? People won't believe it. You took us. into the casket. You had no concerns. about what people believed or didn't. believe. Now all of a sudden everyone's. shy. about a Charlie Kirk video. You're. afraid people are going to think it's. AI. Does that make sense to anybody? No, it doesn't. Of course it doesn't make any sense. That's why they're angry. Now, on that note though, okay? Andrew.

then shifting. foot immediately, shifting his feet. immediately, and and pretending that. that little private correspondence where. we we mocked Barry Weiss's insinuations. that that that somehow counted to me. making a statement. No, no, no, no. Doesn't fly with me. Doesn't fly with. me. Like I said, release the entire. chat. I you have my full permission. And. it must it must be met. with the sentencing. You guys agree? You agree? I must sentence him to more. truth making announcement.

I must sentence Andrew and Erica to more. truth. That is always. always the sentencing in this court. Now, what what would be appropriate? What would be the appropriate level of. truth to sentence you to? I got it. Okay? Now, since what you are attempting. to falsely insinuate. is that I went into that conversation. with Erica on December 15th already. convinced of her guilt, which is. patently untrue. I am now going to prove to audiences. just how untrue that insinuation is.

Okay? With the private revelation. that I made to Erica Kirk, information that I gave her. that I would not have given to her. had I immediately suspected her of her. guilt. I would have given her no. information regarding this. And it was a private revelation made. about you, Andrew Kolbatz. I don't know. if they told you this. This is a really. bad way to find out. But since you tried. to surprise me yesterday, bam, surprise! Surprise, shouty, as they say.

>> [laughter]. >> You see, Andrew, what I told Erica Kirk. is that part of the reason why I. suspected Turning Point. USA and why I thought she should be. looking into other people. is because someone at Turning Point USA. got a message out to me. And that message was that I need to look. further into Andrew Kolbatz. Wow, Turning Point USA people telling me. to look further into Andrew Kolbatz. Was. it Aubrey, as he tries to insinuate?

No. It was Mikey McCoy. Mikey McCoy got a message out to me. uh. via a third-party person that I should. look more into Andrew Kolbatz. Why would. you do that, Andrew? Why would Mikey McCoy say that I should. look more into it? And I did look into. things. Got very shady. And that's when. I started going, "Who the hell is Andrew. Kolbatz actually?". He's obviously not a very good PR agent. Everybody can see that. He's a bit of a. blubbering idiot.

Who is Andrew Kolbatz? What are his. ties? What are his family ties here? And. the more I looked, I did start to see. more things. So, as you. pretend like we're all just conspiracy. theorists and nobody had any good. information, as you inspire a bunch of. employees, like I said, you can still. cannot produce the information that you. are claiming that Aubrey Lich. gave to me that I share on this. platform. You were my number one source, Andrew, in the beginning. You just. forgot the things that you told me and. that's when I started realizing things.

were weird and then I got Mikey Mcoy. telling me. to look more into you. After watching this show, I would say that I had a damn good. reason to suspect Turning Point USA. That they were. complicit in a cover-up of what. happened. Anyway, good luck, Andrew. I hope you're. having a good day. Have fun. Send me your messages. Explain that one. to the press cycle. I think that's going. to catch a couple of headlines. Why would he say that?

Switching gears because it does appear. they are really just throwing everything. at me, particularly yesterday. I didn't. even know which way to look. Happy. birthday to me. Good thing I'm built for. it. I'm I'm just built differently. Erica didn't just name me and put a. target on my back and lie about what I. said, but she wasn't the only one, right? We also had congressman in the. house presenting a bipartisan resolution. name-checking me. This is the headline.

in the Times of Israel headline. Look at this, literally April 29th. I. couldn't believe this. The US House is considering a resolution. condemning Hasan I've never. spoken to that person in my entire life. and Candace Owens for. you got it, guys, anti-Semitism. Who's bringing this forward? Okay, we've got reps Mike Lawler and. Josh Gottheimer. Uh it's a bipartisan bill to denounce. anti-Semitic hate-filled rhetoric. Um. though far left says that the move.

is making anti-Semitism worse. That is. our subheading here. The resolution. begins by condemning anti-Semitic. hate-filled rhetoric and content that is. disseminated to prominent online. personalities. Blah, blah, blah. It tells us that. whereas the rise of digital media. platforms has enabled individuals with. large audiences to disseminate. disinformation, commentary and political. viewpoints to millions of viewers. worldwide, such influence carries a. heightened responsibility to avoid. rhetoric that promotes hatred, violence,

or discrimination against any group, including Jewish individuals and. communities. On the same day, everyone. is just suddenly signaling that speech. is violence. Speech is now violence. They name-check. me and says, "Whereas Candace Owens has. employed rhetoric that has included. conspiracy theories accusing Israel of. controlling the United States. government." By the way, ironically, these two people I I both of them. brought this forward take more than a. million dollars from AIPAC. Government promoting false claims that.

that Jews are taught by ancient. religious texts to hate non-Jews and. casting doubt on the truth of Holocaust. survivors. I mean, this goes on and on. Of course, I can't defend myself. They. can just put whatever they want. It's a. resolution. Uh she made the anti-Semitic claim that. the United States is controlled by. satanic pedophiles who work for Israel. That's not an anti-Semitic claim, okay? Satanic pedophiles working for Israel, we're talking about Epstein and everyone. who has defended the Epstein class, okay? That is not explicitly Jewish. In.

fact, I have been name-checking. Christian Zionist pastor after Christian. Zionist pastor. So, do not put this on. this means you're talking about all. Jews, okay? When Donald Trump said, "What are we still talking about Jeffrey. Epstein?" That is when he lost me. entirely. To my knowledge, President. Trump is not Jewish. That pedophilia is satanic. That a satanic pedophile. like Jeffrey Epstein worked for Israel.

These are. This is abundantly true. This is not a. conspiracy. The fact that you are. passing a resolution about me and not. the people that protect Jeffrey Epstein. says more about you. It then goes on and says. um that I repeated false claims that. Jews are chil-. killing Christian children. Where did I. say this? Where did I say that Jews are. killing Christian children? Where did I. say that? Nope, doesn't matter. You can just say. whatever you want. It's Congress. You. This is like following a law, so you can.

just put things in there. I don't have. to respond to it. This is going to be a. part of record. This is going to be a. part of US history record as they bring. this forward and I have no opportunity. to defend myself or to respond to any of. these points. Beyond that, they then. bring up never never ever forget that in. July 2024, I did not mention Josef. Mengele. And then they erupted by saying. that because I said there was bizarre. propaganda. uh that followed the Holocaust, which is. true. It is objectively true, okay? I'm.

going to show you that's objectively. true. They insert this in here. Never forget that even. I guess never forget was proper to say. that. That even the Auschwitz-Birkenau. Museum, which has a podcast, asserted. that there were lies told about Josef. Mengele. Not me asserting that. They did. an official Holocaust Memorial podcast. where they discussed where some of the. lies. and exaggerations came from. Is that a.

threat. to Jewish people to acknowledge that. some people lie? Okay? That some people misunderstand. I'm going to play it for you. This is. the official Holocaust Memorial podcast. discussing Josef Mengele. Just you can. just read what they are writing and then. hear unless I don't know. Is Is. Auschwitz Memorial podcast anti-Semitic? I don't know. But take a listen. I want to note that many myths arose. around Mengele in the camp, such as the.

alleged sewing together of twins, which. did not happen. Simply because Mengele. saw himself as a scientist, a. theoretician, a man conducting research. Sewing twins together, as Vera Alexander. mentioned, wouldn't make sense from a. medical point of view because Mengele. had sufficient medical knowledge and the. medical understanding of the time. allowed him to know that it would lead. nowhere. So, where did this legend come from? It. likely originated from the fact that. Mengele performed transfusions on twins.

without prior cross-matching tests. This. meant if the donor's blood didn't match. the recipient's, it led to death. To perform a transfusion, people had to. be connected, not sewn together, but. connected with needles and tubes so that. the blood could flow. Therefore, this. legend about Mengele as someone who. sewed children together probably came. from this. I want to be clear why this is important. to you guys. Uh and and specifically I. want to speak to Jewish Americans. because it is just so reminiscent to me.

of how they wanted to pass hate speech. laws in the fog of George Floyd and they. were using race and black people to try. to do this. This is a threat to all of us. Jewish Americans, pay attention because. they are using you to push through. tyranny, okay? You are now the person. they are using to push through tyranny. They think that you are too stupid to. understand difference between. anti-Semitism, uh normal commentary, and debate. Also, by the way, there is an underlying. assumption that you're too weak to deal. with people who don't like you. Who.

cares if people don't like me because. I'm black? I don't actually care. I. don't care. If that If that is your. underlying thought process that every. time you see a black person, you're. like, "I hate that N-word. I hate. N-words all the time." How's that going. to impact my day? Why do you Why do you Why do we care so. much about what other people think about. us? It's a little ridiculous. It's It's. There's just this underlying weakness. that allows people who are actually. tyrannical, people who are actually. doing despicable things, people who. actually support the Epstein files and.

want to protect that network of human. traffickers, okay? They pretend they're. the good guys. They find people who are. weak, can't take being called names. You can. do it. Black people, you can do it. Jews, you. can do it. Spanish people, you can do. it. Asian people, you can do it. You can. handled being called a name. as long as you get to remain free. That's more important. Okay? They are trying to flip that on. its head so they can usher in tyranny. They want Europe. They want what's.

already happening in Florida. Police. showing up on your door asking you if. you sent a tweet. Did you criticize. Candace Owens today? She's black. Did. you know she's black? It's racist. I get called the N-word. every second of every day. Go on, X. I. don't care. Doesn't impact my day. I. don't know who these people are on the. internet. I don't feel threatened by. that. Okay? You You have a right to. think racist thoughts. I know I happen. to genuinely not be a racist. I But if people were racist, I. understand the importance of making sure.

that we don't pass speech laws and that. is what is coming next because they have. been signaling it for a week straight, full fire. Not just Erica Kirk, also uh. Caroline Leavitt came out and now is. trying to equate speech to violence. Take a listen. This political violence stems from a. systemic demonization of him and his. supporters by commentators, yes, by. elected members of the Democrat Party, and even some in the media. The deranged. lies and smears against the president,

his family, his supporters have led. crazy people to believe crazy things. Everyone who has a voice and a platform. across this country, whether you're on. television, a podcast host, uh you know, people listen and when you have mentally. disturbed individuals across the country. who are listening to this crazed. rhetoric about the president day after. day after day, it inspires them to do. crazy things. Laura Loomer is his top advisor.

>> [laughter]. >> Like it's so crazy that they really come. out here and they say this unflinchingly. after the things that come out of. Trump's Truth Social posts. Who is smearing and calling people names. and dehumanizing people more? Posting photos of me when I'm sick than. Donald Trump. Does that now mean that if. an act of violence happened, every time. that happens, I get to now say that this. is this is this is Trump's fault? And again, like I said, it's being. echoed everywhere. Melania Trump she.

tweeted. and said this about Jimmy Kimmel. Jimmy. Kimmel's vote of. joke that happened before the shooting. That it was hateful and violent rhetoric. intended to divide our country. Meanwhile, Caroline Levitt is talking. left versus right. That's Is that not. divisive? His monologue about my family is not. comedy. His words are corrosive and. deepens the political sickness within. America. Does she know who she's married to? Maybe she doesn't. She might not know. People like Kimmel shouldn't have the. opportunity to enter our homes each. evening to spread hate. This is laying.

the ground, ladies and gentlemen, for speech laws. They shouldn't have the. opportunity. She's pretending it's about. Jimmy Kimmel. You start with Jimmy. Kimmel. If we don't defend Jimmy Kimmel, which makes me physically sick. I don't. want to defend Jimmy Kimmel, but I know. how it goes. You start outward. You pretend it's. legitimate. Trump's assassination. We. have to quick quick in the chaos. We. have to just get these speech laws. passed. Then they come inward. And they come inward. And they come. inward. And then it's like grandma. tweeted that this person was ugly and.

and suddenly. you've got people knocking on your door. We can't have that. You know who was. very opposed to that? Charlie Kirk was. I tweeted this and I'm glad to see that. it's trending. Here is his tweet about. alleged hate speech hateful rhetoric. In. other words, said another way. He wrote on May 2nd, 2024, "Hate speech. does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech, there's gross. speech, there's evil speech, and all of it is protected by the First.

Amendment. Keep America free.". That was his voice. I echo that sentiment. Charlie laughed at people when they made. jokes of him, notoriously laughed when. South Park dedicated an entire episode. referring to him as the master debater. He cared deeply. about allowing people to critique him, allowing people to come and debate him, and winning those debates. And if he. lost those debates, which I think never happened,

he knew that that meant that he didn't. have the stronger argument. So, yeah, I agree. Keep America free. We'll be right back after a brief break. All right, you guys. Have you ever tried. keeping up with crypto? It moves all the. time, midnight, 2:00 a.m., 3:00 a.m. The. market never sleeps. And if you are like. most people, you probably do. Here's the. problem. Most crypto platforms just give. you an account and say good luck, but. that's not really investing, that's. guessing. That's why I want to tell you. about Blocktrust IRA, which they crypto. IRA that's designed for everyday. Americans, especially if you're new to. crypto, where you don't have time to.

watch the charts all day. Their system. uses smart AI technology to monitor the. market 24/7, automatically adjusting. your portfolio to help manage risk and. protect your gains when things get. volatile. So, instead of reacting emotionally or. missing big moves while you sleep, it's. handled for you. Your savings sits. inside a $200 million institutional. grade insurance shield. You are not just. investing, you are doing it with a layer. of protection. So, if you've been. curious about crypto, but didn't know. where to start, this is a simple way to. begin. Right now, you can open a crypto. IRA and get up to $25 inflation shield.

bonus added to your account. Just go to. candacecrypto.com. to learn more and get started. Again, that's candacecrypto.com. I also want to tell you guys about The. Purge Store because summer is here, and. for a lot of people, it's a natural. reset point and a renewed focus on. feeling better in your own body. There's. also a growing conversation about being. more proactive with your health, not. just waiting until something feels off, but actually supporting your body. day-to-day. That starts with your. foundation, which is digestion, nutrition, and overall balance. Your. internal environment is the battlefield,

so if you aren't actively clearing out. that biological junk and heavy metals, you are leaving your health to chance. This is why The Purge Advanced Digestive. Cleanse Triple Pack and ToxiBinders are. the solutions that you have been waiting. for. This is not just another. supplement, it's a total internal. overhaul. These formulas use potent. natural ingredients proven for centuries. to purge the toxins that hold your. vitality hostage. This is the ultimate. clean house protocol specifically. designed to detoxify your gut and bind. it to the heavy metals that have no.

business being in your system anyway. You deserve a body that works for you, not against you. So, visit. purgestore.com/candace. and use code Candace at checkout for 15%. off your order. Again, that's. purgestore.com/candace. Get the bundle, take control, and start. your purge today. So, why are they doing this? Why are. they doing this? Why do they want to. come for our speech? Because they view. us, independent media, people uh that. have kept the Epstein story alive.

People that said, "Mm-mm, we're. [clears throat] not accepting this fed. slop narrative regarding Charlie Kirk.". He's trending every day on Twitter. We are almost 8 months into this thing. and Charlie Kirk is still trending on. Twitter, and they wanted this to go. away. At the moment that Erica said, "I. forgive him," they wanted us to forgive. him and move on. Referring to Tyler Robinson. We to them are the storied barbarians at. the gate. How do we control this? We. have built ourselves a mini empire. We. control the media apparatus. We control. the schools. And now we've got people.

pulling their kids out of school, talking about homeschooling, understanding how we lie for the first. time, not looking left or right, but. looking up and down, realizing how. despicable these people are. That yes, of course, we are morally above them. Not falling for their tricks about. racism, sexism, anti-Semitism, locking. arms and realizing we actually don't. hate each other. What we hate is this. corruption. And it exists on the left, on the right, all across the Western Hemisphere. There is nothing but corruption, and. America might be the last stand for.

freedom in the West. If they get what they want and they. begin passing speech laws, it's over. I mean that. So, wake up, understand what's. happening, reject it. Right? Use your platform, if you have. one, to speak out against it. Write to. your congressmen if the the rare ones. that perhaps are not bought and paid. for. Um and if you have an opportunity to. subpoena people for truth, maybe take. it. Maybe take it.

How many more lawsuits can these people. possibly throw at me? A surprise. lawsuit. It's just never been done. Maybe it has. I mean, never been done in. my life, I should say. Anyway, let's get to the top comment. from last episode. We have Wednesday. Coffee writes, "The fact that they gave. you the most vile person of the year, but not Epstein, says it all and then. some." Oh, are you still talking about. Jeffrey Epstein? Yeah, we are. We kind of are. I'm sorry, Mr. President. Yeah, maybe he should have won that. I. felt like I I do have to say that I.

think being a pedophile ranks higher for. being vile. But I don't know. What do I know? I'm just out here trying to use rich. white men, as you said. Brock Jordan writes, "Imagine believing. a lady on the internet is the most vile. person and not the people dropping bombs. on schools." Yeah, that was pretty vile, Trump, when you guys just like randomly. dropped a bomb on 150 schoolgirls in. Iran and then lied to us about it. It ranks up there.

That's what I would say. I don't know. What do I know? I know nothing. That's. That's why you guys we have to squash. the independent. They're so stupid and. low IQ. But for some reason, they're effective. at making people see us through the. correct lens, I see. I I I would say. people are seeing things for the first. time. The scales are falling off of all. of our eyes. All right, to get to some of today's. comments. We're going overtime today. Sorry, Baron. I know Baron waits for me. to get off. I'm actually, if you don't. watch If you didn't watch Baron. Coleman's show last night, please do. watch the show. It was a fantastic.

monologue uh correlating what what is. happening. And he he is holds a. sympathetic view, much more sympathetic. than I do, of what's going on with Erica. Kirk. Um and he sort of correlates it to. to Joe Biden and just being insulated. and people around you who just want to. keep you where you are because it. benefits them and they get enriched, and. everybody can see that it's not working. and that you're incompetent. And then. eventually they're going to have to. admit that. And yeah, it was a really. good monologue. You should watch that. Also, he is going to do a follow-up. Obviously, you know, Baron is a lawyer.

Uh that's his that's his real job. He's. a fantastic podcaster. He just started. this podcast this process of podcasting. full-time, but he will have a very. interesting take on the lawsuit, which I. haven't even finished reading. It It's. so It's so crazy. There were parts where. I just was like, "This is insane." It's. just there's so many lies, objective. lies here about my intentions and my. motivations. Uh but that's the point of. filing these lawsuits so you can send it. to the press and say it's real and say. it's true. And so, therefore, I stated. it, so it must be true. And that is not.

the case. You can lie in filings, as I. just pointed out. Today's comments. Michael Jester writes, "Lawyer here. This money is for her legal fees. Thank. you so much for that donation. Uh your. attorneys and clients suing her over. opinions of free speech to be relevant. uh should beware of a malicious. prosecution suit once a defense verdict. is rendered. You deserve it, and we. should make examples to deter this BS.". Yeah, it I you know, I even think part. of the coordination was like This was. like Laura Loomer hiding money in a. trust. She She She said I was hiding.

money in a trust. Completely untrue. Hiding money from Brigitte. Uh here is. what's happening. Like they were trying. to basically say like getting up this. narrative that like I was duping my. podcast followers. And they kept. bringing up lawsuits, strangely. So, I'm. I'm feeling like a lot of this may have. been like choreographed because this. lawyer, Matt Slauson, the one who speaks. like he has helium. Like he's just. ingested some helium. Uh. definitively was retweeting Laura. Loomer. So, that feels weird. That feels.

like everyone was kind of in a weird way. anticipating this lawsuit and knew that. it may have been coming. And Trump was signaling you should sue. people to to Erica. Anyways, two cents writes. why is everyone suing and not helping. with the investigation? All of them had. direct access with Charlie Kirk instead. of helping they are suing who and what. information are they protecting? Go Max. Yeah, well, thinking clearly through. what going Max means. Maybe that's how. we do it. We can just start actually.

selling that Go Max gear. Hat or whatever it is now and yeah, I I. know what my husband's going to say. He's going to say this is very. expensive. These are these lawsuits to. get to that phase is hundred hundreds of. thousands of dollars. No questions asked. But. truth matters and I I have found that. when you don't overthink, when people. really want money, they tend to lose a lot of it. Right? When your focus is money, money, money,

you tend to lose a lot of it. And when. you are focused on truth and doing the. right thing like no genocide is always. wrong, it actually opens the door for. you get rewarded in the end. I think. that's kind of been the lesson of my. last few years. This the show has been. tremendously successful. And I did the. right thing. The harder thing but the. right thing. And I feel like I am again. being faced with that right now at that. decision. Like I said, I have to speak to my. husband because everything has to be. done together. So, we'll we'll see what. we come up with and I will keep you guys. in the loop. I think you can see where. my heart is on this though.

Keeping the faith with Father Joseph. writes the truth is like a lion, you. don't have to defend it. Just let it out. and it will defend itself. That is very. true. We are seeing that and the truth has. been very powerful and that's what. they're angry about that they don't know. how to deal with the truth being out. there. Jen Common writes UVU just. requires you to fill out a form which is. titled request for authorization to. operate a drone with the office of risk. management. So, did Brian fill out this. form and UVU denied it? If so, he can. show us the form and the denial. Yeah.

Like I said, he could have just disputed. the stuff. I'm not trying to get the. exclusive Brian Harpole. You know, you're out here like I Candace. needs the clicks to talk about Brian. Harpole. Like what are you talking. about? Why would you say these things? It's not true. It is not true. We want to be accurate. It does not benefit me. to be on a platform telling lies. You. will lose your audience. Will no longer. trust you when you do that. They will. just they will be the girl who cried.

wolf. Okay? I want to be accurate. I I'm open. to being wrong. This is an investigation, an open. investigation. So, you're going to. sometimes come up against the wrong. information. But I have thus far not been given an. alibi for the morning of September 9th. despite you asserting that in the. lawsuit. Again, she had his flights. The flights were. for. what? 2:19, 1:19, 1:39 in the afternoon. from Dallas. Mitch says the meeting concluded at 7:30.

a.m. There were flights that left Fort. Huachuca and got back into Dallas by. 10:00 a.m. So, no, you have not but I'm open. Give. me the alibi. Give it to me. Give me the. text message. The Starbucks receipts at the airport or. whatever, wherever you were or I guess. not at the airport cuz that was an. afternoon flight. The coffee receipt from that morning. Like I texted you, I aim to be accurate. And I was sympathetic to you and I was.

wrong about you is what I will say. I. was deeply wrong about you. My instincts. were wrong. and I probably shouldn't have. immediately defended you in the. beginning only for you to throw it in my. face and pretend that I didn't and I was. part of the early conspiracies. Good luck with Matt Christiansen as a. lawyer by the way. We'll say that. Goops writes happy birthday Candace, you. inspire me so much. Stay strong and. God's strength. There is a purpose in. everything. Just rest in his providence. I feel like even there is some. providence to me having received my. confirmation and hearing.

that message that homily about how like. what it means is like you you then. really have to toughen up. You you. become a soldier for truth, a soldier. for Jesus and that happens and I come. back and it is like full blown attacks. on me from every direction. But I was fashioned for this. I really. do believe that. I believe that. everything that's happened to me. happened for a reason because I'm I I. feel battle ready like battle hardened. from 2023 to 2024. The things that. happened, they pulled the carpet under. my feet, they smeared me, tried to stop.

me from being able to travel to. Australia. And so, to go through all of. that, it it just makes you go, okay, I. can I actually now have a. I can deal with this. I I I know how to. fight this. We have the right players. that are in place and I have the support. of the people and that that matters too. to know that people have my back. in in the way that you guys do here in. the comments. Breezy writes fight for. fighting for Charlie. Thank you for. keeping this story as alive as you have. Thank you guys for caring about this. story.

I I got to think that he is watching. actually and. you know, helping in any way that he. can. I also want to tell you guys great. way to support us obviously always is. the merch store. Buy yourself a t-shirt, buy yourself a hat. Go to. CandaceOwens.com. Tomorrow we have book club and we this. will be ending the book The Secret. Founding of America of America and we. will then be jumping into my book which.

I'm super excited about. which is Make Him a Sandwich. Love that. book so much. You can that's a signed. copy bundle. You can obviously buy a. regular copy available on Amazon. You. can go to makehimasandwich.com, buy a. regular copy, a regularly priced copy and not having. to buy a bundle of the two signed books. and join the book club. That would be an. amazing way. to join us and in discussion and talking. about feminism and what the true origins. and true intent of feminism was and is.

It may shock you. Ties in perfectly to. everything. Anyway, you guys, that is. all we have for you today. We really. went overtime this week. Maybe because I. was gone, I kind of feel like I owed you. guys. You guys are always so worried. when I'm gone but I was good. I just. don't post too much about where I'm. going because there are insane people on. the internet especially when I am. traveling with my family. We will see you guys for book club. tomorrow. Otherwise, we will see the. rest of you on Monday. Be sure to catch. up with Baron Coleman tonight. We'll see. you guys then.

>> [music].