Pam Bondi gets NIGHTMARE NEWS about Epstein files

I'm joined now by Congressman Ted Lou. Congressman, thanks for joining me. >> Honored to be on your show. >> So, Congressman, you've pointed out in a. clip that's going viral across social. media right now that Donald Trump. himself is implicated in the Epstein. files with accusations that are beyond. heinous. Now, Todd Blash, Pam Bondi, Cash Patel have all come forward and. basically said that there's no reason to. look into the files and any. co-conspirators because they don't. exist. And so, how do you square these. two things where you have evidence. against Donald Trump himself in these. files and yet all of these law.

enforcement officials who refuse to. acknowledge objective reality? >> Absolutely. Pam Bondi and Cash Patel. lied under oath. Todd Blanch also lied, but he wasn't under oath. So lucky for. him, if you look at the Epstein files. release that's come out so far, there. are multiple documents where there's. evidence implicating Trump and not just. crimes, but deeply serious crimes. And. so I'll just give you one example. Uh. the FBI's own internal slideshow uh that.

they had, it's about 21 slides. two uh. of their allegations are about Donald. Trump committing crimes. You also have a. FBI document. It's a intake form of a. witness who called the FBI's National. Threat Operations Center. And the. witness reports that he met a girl who. directly told him that Trump and Epstein. raped her. Department of Justice never. interviews this witness. Doesn't do.

followup. Now, the you you had posted about this. online and DOJ's rapid response account. and and granted I take everything that. the administration especially as it. relates to the Epstein files with a. grain of salt, but they said that she. spoke with the FBI and her claims were. deemed not credible. This was all. unredacted as we said. So, can I have. your reaction to the DOJ's rapid. response account? >> Well, that's just false. So, the. document I'm referring to is an intake.

form from the FBI's National Threat. Operations Center. The person making the. witness statement was a man relaying. what a girl he met had told him. This. man was also a limousine driver for. Donald Trump. Um, and he also says in. the same witness report that he. overheard Donald Trump talking to. Jeffrey on his cell phone talking about. abusing a girl and that what Donald. Trump said was so disturbing the man. wanted to stop the limo and hurt Trump.

So, this seems like a very credible. witness and the Department of Justice. never interviews him. I don't really. know what the rap response for the. Department of Justice is talking about. They're clearly talking about some other. document that I'm not referring to. Um, and again, there's the FBI's own. internal slideshow. And then there's. other documents that have been now sort. of dissected by folks who are. independent journalists and folks on. social media that show there's two other. allegations essentially of women that.

have made allegations against Donald. Trump that would have Trump basically. having sex relations with a minor. So, how does Todd Blanch get off then in. saying that there's there's no reason to. uh to investigate any of the. co-conspirators? Because there aren't. even co-conspirators. This is just. Jeffrey Epstein orchestrating a sex. trafficking ring where he traffics a. thousand girls to himself when evidence. like this exists. Well, just think how ludicrous it is. just based on your recounting of it. The. Department of Justice has confirmed.

there's over 1,000 victims of Epstein's. global pedophilia sex trafficking ring. And the Trump Department of Justice has. held zero men accountable. Yeah, >> it's just a ludicrous number. And other. countries are taking this far more. seriously. France, for example, uh they. their main Paris prosecutor has uh open. an investigation, a criminal. investigation. Um they have arrested a. uh person. And then you've got the UAE. that is also taking some serious action.

Britain has right taken Prince Andrew, stripped him of his title and kicked him. out of his home. And now they're looking. at opening a criminal investigation. So. everyone is taking it seriously except. Pam Bondi, Cash Patel, and Todd Blanch. >> Les Wexner, who is one of the uh uh. accused co-conspirators within the. Epstein files, um was was interviewed. today at the House Oversight Committee. And I know that you sit on judiciary, but as far as the reporting goes, there.

wasn't a single Republican who showed up. to uh to that hearing. It was only. Democrats. And so, what is your reaction. to the fact that the Republicans. couldn't be bothered to show up for one. of the few co-conspirators who we. actually know about despite the best. efforts of the Trump administration to. hide all of this? >> Other than a handful of Republicans uh. like Thomas Massie. Yeah. uh and uh. Lauren Boowbert and um Nancy Mason, Anapoleon Luna, most of them are.

complicit. They are complicit in the. cover up. They don't want to talk about. this and they know that Donald Trump is. implicated uh in the Epstein files. He. is in the files over 38,000 times. according to a New York Times analysis. Other analysis have him more than that. And you've got multiple documents of. actual witnesses alleging firsthand of. crimes that Donald Trump committed. And. then you have the Department of Justice. not following up in terms of what the.

next steps are hopefully going to be in. Congress. What are you looking to do? Because I know that this process is is. kind of slogging its way forward. You're. not going to get any assistance from. Republicans. You're not you're certainly. not going to get any assistance from the. DOJ or the Trump administration. So. every victory here has to be, you know, hard fought and won. But what is the. next priority in terms of the Epstein. files? >> It is super helpful that you have many. people in America looking at these. documents. The sheer volume is.

overwhelming. Over 3 million documents. have been released. So it's helpful when. we get notice of folks that say, "Hey, look at this document. There's something. really strange here or incriminatory or. creepy." And you see that happen on. social media and on the internet. So. that is helpful. Uh in addition, the. administration is not immune to public. pressure. So the more Americans that. speak up uh that ask questions. I think. every reporter uh should be asking Pam.

Bondi and Todd Blanch uh the question of. >> are you withholding any photo, video, or. document that has Donald Trump in it in. the Epstein files? Uh and if so, why are. you withholding it? Well, my concern. here, and I'm sure this is a concern. that that you and other members of. Congress share, is that if something is. too damning as far as Trump is. concerned, that the DOJ is just going to. destroy it. And so, how can you have. confidence that that if the DOJ does. have some smoking gun or some or some.

damaging evidence that points back to. Donald Trump or any of his pals or. donors that it's actually going to it's. it's going to be retained by this DOJ? So you would hope uh that the Americans. serving in the Department of Justice who. have looked at these documents and. videos and photos uh will number one. remember what they saw uh and number two. not commit a crime and destroy them. Uh. so that is the hope. Now you know if.

people are going to engage in crimes uh. then that is definitely a problem and. hopefully that that won't happen. And I. do note that for a number of crimes such. as murder or rape under federal law, there is no statute of limitations. So. the next administration can come in and. look at all these files, choose release. them, choose to prosecute. And again, this is not just about Donald Trump. Uh. there are multiple perpetrators and. co-conspirators. You have former Prince.

Andrew. I I showed photos of Pam Bondi. where she acknowledged. >> former president was with a sex traffic. victim. That photo by itself is evidence. of a crime, right? >> And there's all this other evidence in. books and other documents about former. Prince Andrew. She could indict him. right now and a grand jury would indict. I don't know why she doesn't do that. Well, if if we know that there is. evidence of crimes contained within. these files, people who should be held. to account, and you have DOJ officials.

whose job is to hold criminals to. account, who instead are deferring to. protecting these people, aren't aren't. these DOJ officials like Pam Bondi and. Todd Blanch and Cash Patel basically. presenting themselves as accessories. after the fact? Isn't this evidence of. them committing the crime because they. were supposed to a release these files. in accordance with the Epstein Files. Transparency Act and B prosecute them in. accordance with their own oath to the US. Constitution as law enforcement. officials at the DOJ?

Pam Bonnie and Cash Patel committed. perjury. That is a crime and obviously. Pam Bonnie is not going to prosecute. herself, right? But another uh. administration could. And then you have. just um unbelievable. screw-ups where uh they put victim's. names out unredacted and they ruin a a. number of lives. Um and and so you're. looking at this and you just wonder were.

they careless or were they malicious? Uh. it is um just very disappointing, depressing to see and I don't know how. Pam Bonnie, Cash Patel and Tab Lanch. look at themselves in the mirror. What. responsibility does the subsequent. Democratic administration have to. fearlessly and relentlessly pursuing. justice? And I asked that as as someone. who watched the Merrick Garland. Department of Justice drag its feet on. holding Trump accountable for two years. because they wanted to avoid the optics. of politicization. But but in effect,

all you do by trying to avoid a. politicized DOJ is is basically give a. free pass to a political figure and kind. of swing the pendulum in the opposite. direction. And so what responsibility h. does this the next attorney general who. has some commitment to the rule of law. have to relentlessly, fearlessly. pursuing um pursuing this stuff as. opposed to, you know, what we saw in. past administrations. Uh, the reason that you see a number of.

MAGA influencers now turning against. Trump on the Epstein Files is because. people understand this isn't just about. Donald Trump. This is about a global. pedophilia sex operation that had over a. thousand victims. We're talking about. girls who were raped and sexually. assaulted. And you can't just sort of. make that go away or not deal with it or. say, you know, it's just on Epstein. Um, and people have this innate sense of.

justice and accountability and people. want that to happen. And whether it. falls on a perpetrator who happens to be. a Republican or a Democrat or an. independent doesn't really matter. People who are engaged uh in this. despicable, horrendous behavior need to. be held accountable. And I think the. American public, whether you're right or. left, just can't understand why the. Trump Department of Justice looks like. it's doing a cover up of this horrific. sex operation that Epstein was engaged. in.

>> You know, you had mentioned at the top. there are only a few Republicans who are. actually participating in trying to. uncover what's happening here. You had. mentioned Thomas Massie, Anna Paulina. Luna, um Nancy Mace, uh Marjorie Taylor. Green before she had left Congress, Lauren Boowbert. So, you know, the list. is small. Have you heard from any. Republican colleagues behind the scenes? And and granted, I I know that, you. know, we we've heard this song before. where you have Republicans kind of. murmur things behind the scenes, but. they're too afraid to say it publicly, but does that exist in this scenario, or.

are they really allin, you know, even on. the issue of protecting a a notorious. pedophile? You have to be uh in a cult uh to think. that Donald Trump is completely innocent. uh with regard to Epstein files. Yeah. Remember that you know Trump fought very. hard to not have these files released. Uh so some of them are in a cult and I. think they believe that but I think the. majority understand that uh he is.

implicated in these files. And I just. want to note that during the House. Judiciary Committee hearing with Pam. Bondi um only two Republicans asked. about the Epstein files. Thomas Massie. and Chip Rory. Every single other. Republican avoided that issue. And that. tells you all you need to know about the. state of the Republican party. Yeah, I. think that's perfectly put. We'll leave. it there, Congressman. I appreciate your. time on this. Thank you so much. >> Thank you.

[music].