MAGA host LOSES IT on her OWN show when confronted about Epstein

Given the fact that Trump himself is. named in the Epstein files 38,000 times, do you think he should at least testify. in the same way that Bill and Hillary. Clinton did? Uh there are multiple. people who have testified already in. these depositions who have said that the. president is not implicated in any kind. of crime. >> hear from the guy? Wouldn't you want to. hear Wouldn't you want to hear from the. guy? Wouldn't you want to hear Wouldn't. you want to hear right from the horse's. mouth? I think the president has much. bigger issues to deal with. And even. today, President Bill Clinton said that. >> Bigger issues than being Bigger issues. than being implicated in a big sex. trafficking. >> We started the show talking about the.

Epstein files. I think it's interesting. that we're now diverting away from the. facts on local Democrats letting. criminals out of prison who are then. going and murdering people at at bus. stops and on the train on the way home. But I want to get to this. I think it's. a pretty I think it's a pretty big issue. when you have the sitting president of. the And and frankly, if the president. was a Democrat and he was implicated in. the biggest sex trafficking ring in the. United States in the history of this. country, I think the word implicated is. pretty strong. And I I think that. >> you know? But how would you know if he. doesn't testify?

>> Because you can read cuz because you can. read the documents, you can read the. emails. And this isn't just about. President Trump. But we have 3 million. documents that haven't been released. Yes, you can. The Epstein thing. is a distraction is a distraction from. what's actually happening from this. story that happened just today where we. have a an illegal immigrant [laughter]. from West Africa. >> the idea of a sex of a of a registered. sex offender Yeah, registered convicted. sex offender. Not the president who was. named in files with no evidence at all. of criminal wrongdoing. Those are two.

very different things. >> you want some transparency? Why wouldn't you want some transparency? >> been plenty of transparency, which is. why President Trump signed legislation. to put out the documents. >> support the Do you support the James. Comey testimony in front of the. president in front of the. Look, we're completely off base here. talking about Epstein files. I want to. ask you this question about what. happened in Fairfax County just tonight. We now know That was me debating Katie. Pavlich on her show on NewsNation where. she opened the segment by asking me a. question about a registered sex offender. who's running for some local office.

Now, she thought that I was going to do. what she does, which is blindly defer to. anybody who runs for office as a. Democrat. But instead, I told her that I. don't think registered sex offender. should be elected to any office and that. that was a position I'm actually pretty. consistent on. But you probably noticed. in that clip that while she was quick to. attack some random no-name Democrat in. some random local office, she saves no. smoke for a slightly more important. office, that of the President United. States of America being implicated in a. sex trafficking ring. Apparently, it's. 100% disqualifying if you're running for.

dog catcher as some person with some. relation to a sex offender, but not a. concern at all if you're President of. the United States. Convenient, huh? And. look, I'm not saying that Donald Trump. should be thrown into prison here. I'm. simply asking for him to testify based. on the precedent that James Comer, a. Republican, established. He wanted Bill. Clinton to testify for the Oversight. Committee, which he did. Hell, even. Hillary Clinton testified for the. Oversight Committee, and she's got. nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein. And. yet, Donald Trump, who is named most in.

the Epstein files only after Jeffrey. Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, somehow. shouldn't testify? Explain to me how. that makes any sense. Granted, Comer. still tried to explain away his double. standard. >> Secretary Clinton said in her opening. statement, if Republicans were serious. about investigating Jeffrey Epstein, that you would call President Trump to. testify. Why won't you? Well, uh. President Trump has answered. hundreds, if not thousands, of questions. from you all about Epstein. Uh. and I I think he's been very transparent.

in releasing the documents. We expect uh. hopefully more documents to come in. We're still assessing the 3 million-plus. documents that we have. Uh we obviously. will be moving on to the next phase and. bringing more people in for questions, so To be clear, answering questions. about Epstein by lying is not. transparency, it's just lying. By. Comer's logic, answers like these would. be sufficient to say that Donald Trump. has already answered for all of his. Epstein connections in a satisfactory. manner. Are you still talking about. Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked.

about for years. You're asking We have. Texas, we have this, we have all of the. things like. And are people still talking about this. guy, this creep? That is unbelievable. Do you want to waste the time on it? Do. you feel like answering? >> I I don't mind answering, but. >> I mean, I can't believe you're asking a. question on Epstein at a time like this. where we're having some of the greatest. success and and also tragedy with what. happened in Texas. It just seems.

like a desecration, but you go ahead. What did Jeffrey Epstein mean in his. emails when he said you knew about the. girls? I know nothing about that. That would. have been out there a long time ago. It's really What did he mean when he. spent all the time with Bill Clinton, with the president of Harvard, you know, that is Summers, uh Larry Summers, whatever his name is, and all of the other people that he. spent time with. Jeffrey Epstein and I had a good man. relationship for many years.

But he also saw a shrink because I was. president. So, he dictated a couple of. memos to him subject to being right. You're going to find out what did he. know. with respect to Bill Clinton, with respect to the head of Harvard, with respect to all of those people and. he never called JP Morgan Chase. So, if. there was nothing incriminating in the. emails, I said it was a lie. I said it. Why. Why are you laughing? Women who were are survivors of. Epstein's are unhappy with those. redactions that came out. Some of them, entire witness interviews are totally.

blacked out. Do you think that they. should be more transparent? >> that they thought they released too. much, you know, I heard that. And you. tell me something else. No. I think it's really time for the country. to get on to something else, really. You. know, now that. nothing came out about me other than. it was a conspiracy against me, literally, by Epstein and other people. But, I think it's time now for the. country to maybe get on to something. else, like health care. Something that people care about. Yeah,

what do you What do you say? Go ahead. You are the worst reporter. No wonder C-. CNN has no ratings because of people. like you. You know, she's a young woman. I don't think I've ever seen you smile. I've known you for 10 years. I don't. think I've ever seen a smile in your. face. You know why You know why you're not. smiling? Because you know you're not. telling the truth. And you're You're a. very dishonest organization, and they. should be ashamed of you.

I don't know anything about the Epstein. files, you know. I've been fully. exonerated. Yeah, but. That right there is not transparency. That is a bunch of obfuscation. You. don't get credit for having temper. tantrums when you've been asked. legitimate questions. Someone might want. to let the chair of the Oversight. Committee know. The reality is that I supported Bill. Clinton testifying. Hell, I supported. Hillary Clinton testifying. I support. anyone and everyone testifying who has. any relationship whatsoever to Jeffrey. Epstein. For me, this is not political.

For most Americans, this is not. political. It is about doing the thing. that Donald Trump's own administration. promised to do when they were. campaigning back in 2024, which is to. expose the people who have engaged in. horrific crimes against children, and. hold those people to account regardless. of political party. This should be an. issue that transcends party politics, but apparently for some people, defending Trump is more important than. exposing pedophiles. I actually asked. Congressman Ro Khanna about the. likelihood of hauling Trump in front of. Congress to testify. Here's what he had. to say. Is there some recognition by.

even your Republican colleagues that if. the precedent they want to establish is. that you can haul in. former presidents and their families if. they have any involvement whatsoever. with Epstein to answer questions under. oath, um that there will come a point when. Donald Trump is not in office anymore, and that those people have to abide by. the precedent that they're setting right. now. Has that dawned on these people, or. do you think that they're that they're. just saying it now because it's. convenient to drag Bill Clinton in, and. then they'll pull a Mitch McConnell and. change their mind once it's no longer. politically convenient for them to have. to do so?

Certainly dawned on Donald Trump. That's. why he doesn't want Bill Clinton to be. testifying. That's why he's out there. saying, "I don't like what I'm seeing.". So, if he's saying that, I mean, it's. it's it's a serious enough possibility. for him to be considering it. Well, he. knows. He knows that he's going to be. out of power, and he knows that. likelihood. Robert Garcia is going to be chairman of. oversight. And what's. what's he going to do? The first thing. we're going to subpoena Trump. So, the. reality is that Trump has far more at. stake on this. He's the one who actually.

has to answer a lot of the questions. And I I actually think Comer has set a. trap because now, when you have Bill. Clinton willing to testify and Hillary. Clinton willing to testify, any rich and. powerful person in America can evade. testimony. Uh and that is a in my view. actually a good thing. I mean, we need a. clearing of this elite class, the. Epstein class that was callow, immature, reckless, that basically. went to an island with a convicted. pedophile, did business ventures with a. convicted pedophile because they were so.

interested in being part of this elite. because they thought that they were. above the law. And until there is a. moral reckoning and a clearing of this. class, I don't care they're Democrats, Republicans, until there's a clearing of. this class and a new moral beginning, we. aren't going to restore the democratic. project. Fortunately, this is the one. thing that seems to unite Americans. Uh. left and right to take on uh this. corrupt class. And of course, to watch. the full interview with Ro Khanna and. all of my other interviews, the best way. to do that is to subscribe to this. channel. I'll put the link right here on. the screen. Completely free to.

subscribe, but a great way to support my. work. So, just hit the subscribe button. I really appreciate it. But the bad news. for Trump here is building. First of. all, Republicans look increasingly. likely to lose their House majority. That means that Democrats will have. subpoena power. Now, Pam Bondi's. Department of Justice will never enforce. a subpoena against their leader, but. that will only further expose their. complicity in this entire cover-up. And. second, now the Republicans themselves. have established the precedent that. former presidents can be hauled in front. of Congress to testify. One day, Donald.

Trump will be a former president. And. when he comes back to testify, he'll. have who else but James Comer and. congressional Republicans to thank. So, if he tries to act surprised, someone. should remind him of the moment that. we're in right now. >> [music]. >> Before you go, if you enjoyed this. content and you want to see more and. support independent media, please. subscribe to this channel. The subscribe. button will be right here on the screen. But second, the reality is that we are. now in a political environment where. this administration can lean on any of. the social media platforms to suppress.

certain voices if they don't like. critical coverage. That means my. longevity here is in the hands of a few. tech billionaires who are already making. it clear that they are willing to cater. to this administration. To that end, signing up for my newsletter is a way. for me to reach you directly if that. ever becomes necessary. I'll put the. link right here on the screen as well, so please sign up. It's free, but. there's also an option to do a paid. subscription if you'd like to support me. and my team. I really appreciate it. Thanks so much for watching.