🚨 Epstein files mystery BLOWN OPEN in massive update

What I saw um that bothered me were the. names of at least six men that have been. redacted that are likely uh incriminated. by their inclusion in these files. So, that's that's the first thing that I. saw. It took some digging to find them. Um then I'll let you talk about what you. saw. Well, and we discussed that. I. mean, there are six men, uh some of them. with their photographs, that have been. redacted, and there's no explanation. why those people were redacted, and Tom. was uh discovered it through his MIT.

logic with some of the the searches. But, you know, that's really concerning. There are six men. We went in there for. 2 hours. There's millions of files, right? And in a couple of hours, we. found six men whose names have been. redacted, who are implicated in the way. that the files are presented. What's. your message to Pam. Bondi after what you saw today? What's. your message to Pam Bondi after what you. saw today? Um you need need to do a little more. work. And I would like I mean, we'll see.

her at the uh. Judiciary Committee here in a couple. days. At the very least, they these six. men, maybe she can make public. I mean, we're happy to provide the information. to them, uh and they should do that. These men. Are these men US citizens? Uh what. fields do they work in? Are they Is it. finance? Is it political? Um at least one is a US citizen. At. least one is a foreigner. And the other three or four have names. I'm not sure if they're foreigner.

US. And which field do they work in? Is. it Is it finance, banking, uh political? One is pretty high up in a foreign. government. >> And and and and some are They're. >> [clears throat]. >> One of the others is a pretty prominent. uh individual. But, I I think that they. the point is that these six are just. what we found in 2 hours of a review of. the files that aren't redacted. The. broader issue is why so many of the. files that they're getting are redacted. in the first place. Some bombshell news. here. The names of at least six men who.

were likely incriminated in the Epstein. files have instead had their names. redacted thanks to the DOJ. And. remember, the plain text of the Epstein. Files Transparency Act forbids that. I'm. going to read this directly from the. law. Quote, "No record shall be. withheld, delayed, or redacted on the. basis of embarrassment, reputational. harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.". So, not only has the DOJ violated the. law by refusing to release the full. Epstein files by the December 19th. deadline, not only has the DOJ violated.

the law by their ongoing refusal to. release the outstanding 3 million. documents, not only has the DOJ violated. the law by failing to explain their. redactions by the December 19th. deadline, but they violated the plain. text of the law, and frankly, the spirit. of the law by protecting the very people. that this law was supposed to expose and. hold to account. And the only possible. explanation is that this Department of. Justice is engaged in a cover-up. Full. stop. What makes all of this more. obvious is that just a week ago, Deputy.

Attorney General Todd Blanche came out. and said this. You said this is the end. of the Epstein of your review of the. Epstein files. So, just to clarify, or. is the public going to learn the. identities of the men who abused the. girls. with the information that you're. releasing? And if not, why not? And then, I have a quick. follow-up. I mean, you just baked in an. assumption into your question that I. have never said and I don't know to be. true. Is the public going to learn about.

men that abused these girls? Like, what. does that mean? I mean, I don't. understand what that means. Well, I mean, they're the men who abused the young. women at through Epstein's. um through Epstein's. >> Look, we we said in July, um and it. remains as true today as it was in July. Um if we had information, we meaning the. Department of Justice, about men who. abused women, we would um we would we would prosecute. them, right? We talked about the work. that we're doing. That's why I said.

that. There's I said this earlier, there's this built-in assumption that. somehow there's this hidden tranche of. information of men that we know about. that we're covering up or that we're not. we're choosing not to prosecute. That is. not the case. So, that was the Deputy. Attorney General saying that there were. no other co-conspirators. And in fact, mocking the very notion that such a. thing could even exist. Suggesting. instead that this sex trafficking ring. involving more than a thousand girls got. trafficked nowhere to no one, which is. convenient if you're oh, I don't know,

looking to cover for, say, your former. criminal defendant client who may also. be implicated in the Epstein files. Just, you know, to pick an example out. of nowhere. Of course, thanks to Massie. and Ro Khanna, we now know that that's a. total lie. But there was already plenty. of other evidence that it wasn't true. For example, back in December, an email. was released that explicitly mentioned. the existence of co-conspirators. The. contents of the email read in part, quote, "Good morning, ASC redacted is. requesting an update on the 10.

co-conspirators by close of business. today. Can you tell us how many have. been located, interviewed, served with. grand jury subpoenas? I believe the. breakdown was five in New York, one in. North Carolina, one in Boston, and three. in Florida. Please let me know if you. need anything from us. Thank you, redacted, violent crime section, crimes. against children human trafficking. unit." The response email reads, "Of the. 10 co-conspirators, three have been. located in Florida and served grand jury. subpoenas. One in Boston, one in New. York City, and one in Connecticut were. located and served. Four of the 10 are. outstanding with attempts having been.

made. One is a wealthy businessman in. Ohio. A lead is being sent to CV. The. remaining three are currently out of. pocket. The team, eight SA's, TFO's, two. US Attorneys, is flying out tonight. tomorrow to various locations in Florida. to interview approximately 25 victims. The 1-800 call FBI line is up and. running. We have received approximately. 45 calls, which we are in the process of. vetting out. Let me know if you need. anything else, Shawn. So, the theory. that there are no other co-conspirators. has been on life support for months. based on the evidence, which raises the. obvious question, why is the DOJ making.

sweeping proclamations that no one else. is involved when there are emails by. prosecutors who are usually circumspect. enough not to admit to the existence of. co-conspirators in writing if they don't. exist. At some point, the cover-up. becomes so apparent that it's hard not. to believe that the Department of. Justice is working on Epstein's behalf. and spitting in the faces of the. survivors that they claim to care about. In fact, I asked Congressman Ro Khanna. about that exact email and got some. pretty interesting news today. In those.

emails, they talked about the existence. of 10 co-conspirators. and grand juries that had been served. for those co-conspirators. Three were in. Florida, one was in Boston, one in New. York, one in Connecticut. I'm assuming. if these prosecutors felt strongly. enough to put in writing that these. people were co-conspirators in this. case, that they didn't do it completely. baselessly. And so, um did you have the. opportunity to follow any of those leads. based on those previously released. emails? Yes, and that's what we're saying. There's six men who are named, whose.

identities have been So, those are those. are correlated with that email? They're. correlated with that email and civil war. documents. Now, some of the. co-conspirators again are women, and my. guess is that they've redacted all the. women. I'm not saying that all the women. are survivors, but there may be some. overlap between survivors and. co-conspirators. There are maybe other. women who were actually guilty who they. shouldn't have redacted, but certainly. they shouldn't be redacting men. And in. just two hours, Massie and I identified. six men.

with their pictures who they were. protecting. A couple of them pretty. prominent, and that certainly shouldn't. be the case. And of course, if you want. to watch the full interview with Ro. Khanna, which I would highly recommend, please make sure to subscribe to my. channel so that you can watch that video. and more. That link is right here on the. screen or also in the post description. It is and always will be 100% free, but. again, a great way to support my work. So, look, the reality is that the only. way we're going to get any movement on. this is by people like Ro Khanna and. Thomas Massie and the rest of us, a. broad bipartisan coalition forcing the.

government's hand. Nothing will come. willfully from the Trump administration. They are not on the side of the victims. They are not on the side of the. survivors. They are on the side of the. perpetrators and co-conspirators that. they're trying to gaslight the rest of. us into thinking don't exist. So, this. will be a battle, but it's a battle. we're winning. And I feel confident in. saying that between everybody in the. coalition we're building to get to the. truth, it's going to be increasingly. difficult for the White House to win the. cover-up battle that they're engaged in. right now.

>> [music]. >> Before you go, if you enjoyed this. content and you want to see more and. support independent media, please. subscribe to this channel. The subscribe. button will be right here on the screen. But second, the reality is that we are. now in a political environment where. this administration can lean on any of. the social media platforms to suppress. certain voices if they don't like. critical coverage. That means my. longevity here is in the hands of a few. tech billionaires who are already making. it clear that they are willing to cater. to this administration. To that end, signing up for my newsletter is a way.

for me to reach you directly if that. ever becomes necessary. I'll put the. link right here on the screen as well, so please sign up. It's free, but. there's also an option to do a paid. subscription if you'd like to support me. and my team. I really appreciate it. Thanks so much for watching.