BREAKING: EXPLOSIVE revelation from Epstein files STUNS ALL

An explosive new revelation from the. Epstein files makes national news and. I've got four interviews. Roana, Don. Lemon, Dan Feifer, and Mark Warner. I'm. Brian Teller Cohen, and you're watching. No Lie. [music]. So, we have got an explosive new. revelation from the Epstein files. But. first, I want to set the stage because. just days ago, the Deputy Attorney. General, Todd Blanch, offered up this. insane announcement about Epstein's. co-conspirators, or lack thereof. We. said in July um and it remains as true. today as it was in July um if we had.

information we meaning the Department of. Justice about men who abused women we. would um we would we would prosecute. them. Right? We talked about the work. that we're doing. That's why I said that. there I said this earlier. There's this. built-in assumption that somehow there's. this hidden trunch of information of men. that we know about that we're covering. up or that we're not we're choosing not. to prosecute. That is not the case. I. don't know whether there are men out. there that abuse these women. Um, if if. we learn about information and evidence.

that that allows us to prosecute them, you better believe we will. But, but I. don't think that that that the public or. you all are going to uncover um men. within the Epstein files that abuse. women, unfortunately. >> So, that's it. No other co-conspirators, just a sex trafficking ring where the. more than thousand girls got trafficked. nowhere to no one, which is convenient. if you're looking to, oh, I don't know, cover for your friends who may also be. implicated in the Epstein files. Well,

it turns out that at least one of the. documents that was just released as part. of this latest trunch poses quite a. problem for Todd Blanch and his. narrative. The document reads, quote, from redacted to Jeffrey Epstein, thank. you for a fun night. your littlest girl. was a little naughty. So, I'm sorry, but. if you're Todd Blanch, how do you square. your comment that no one else is. involved and that we shouldn't expect. any more prosecutions from the DOJ when. emails like this exist? And why on God's. green earth is that name redacted? I'm.

assuming that it wasn't a victim who. wrote to Jeffrey Epstein that his. littlest girl was a little naughty. So, if someone can explain why the DOJ is. acting as the personal criminal defense. attorney for Epste's co-conspirators, I'm all ears. In fact, while this one. document debunks Todd Blanch's statement. unto itself, it's not even necessary. because back in December, an email was. released that explicitly mentioned the. existence of co-conspirators in again. opposition to what Todd Blanch is saying. today. The contents of that email read. in part, quote, "Good morning, ASC.

redacted is requesting an update on the. 10 co-conspirators by close of business. today. Can you tell us how many have. been located, interviewed, served with. grand jury subpoenas?" I believe the. breakdown was five in New York, one in. North Carolina, one in Boston, and three. in Florida. Please let me know if you. need anything from us. Thank you. Redacted violent crime section, crimes. against children, human trafficking. unit. The response email reads, quote, "Of the 10 co-conspirators, three have. been located in Florida and serve grand. jury subpoenas. One in Boston, one in.

New York City, and one in Connecticut. were located and served. Four of the 10. are outstanding with attempts having. been made. One is a wealthy businessman. in Ohio. A lead is being sent to CV. The. remaining three are currently out of. pocket. The team, eight SAS, TFOs, two. US attorneys, is flying out tonight, tomorrow, to various locations in. Florida to interview approximately 25. victims. The 1800 call FBI line is up. and running. We have received. approximately 45 calls, which were in. the process of vetting out. Let me know. if you need anything else, Sean. So, I'm.

sorry, but what are we doing here? Why. is the DOJ now making sweeping. proclamations that nobody else is. involved when there are emails like this. by prosecutors who by the way are. usually circumspect enough not to admit. to the existence of co-conspirators in. writing if they don't exist. If there. are emails from some redacted name. thanking Jeffrey Epstein for a good time. from his littlest girl. At some point, the cover up just becomes so apparent. that it's hard not to believe that the. Justice Department is working on.

Epstein's behalf and spitting in the. face of the survivors who they claim to. care about. So look, if Trump's DOJ. wants to continue engaging in this. farce, that's their prerogative. But. they're losing their base. They're. losing the country. And frankly, they. are losing the plot. The federal. government is supposed to bring the. pedophiles to justice, not protect them. from it. But apparently that's not the. priority of Donald Trump, or any of his. other accessories after the fact. Next. up are my interviews with Roana, Don. Lemon, Dan Feifer, and Mark Warner. No. lie is brought to you by Shopify.

Starting something new isn't just hard, it's scary. So much work goes into this. thing that you're not entirely sure is. going to work out. And it can be hard to. make that leap of faith. Trust me, I. know. When I started this podcast, I. wasn't even sure what I was doing. What. if nobody listens? What if I can't offer. something worth listening to? Now, I'm. glad that I believed in myself and. launched this podcast despite all the. fears and hesitations. But let's be. clear, it certainly helps when you have. a partner like Shopify on your side to. help. Shopify is the commerce platform. behind millions of businesses around the. world and 10% of all e-commerce in the.

United States. From my website, brian. tellercohen.com, to brands just getting. started. Get started with your own. design studio. With hundreds of. readytouse templates, Shopify helps you. build a beautiful online store that. matches your brand style. Accelerate. your efficiency. Whether you're. uploading products or trying to improve. existing ones, Shopify is packed with. helpful AI tools that write product. descriptions, page headlines, and even. enhance your product photography. Get. the word out like you have an entire. marketing team behind you. Easily create. email and social media campaigns. wherever your customers are scrolling or.

strolling. And best yet, Shopify is your. commerce expert with world-class. expertise in everything from managing. inventory to international shipping to. processing returns and beyond. And what. if people haven't heard about my brand? Shopify helps you find your customers. with easyto run email and social media. campaigns. It's time to turn those. whatifs into with Shopify today. Sign up. for your $1 per month trial today at. shopify.com/btc. Go to shopify.com/btc. That's shopify.com/btc.

[bell]. I'm joined by the author of the Epstein. Transparency Act, Roana. Congressman, thanks for joining me. >> Ryan, great to be back. So, we have a. big release of the Epstein files, about. 3 million documents. Obviously, everyone's going through them right now. and and we're going to see more and more. from what has been uncovered. But. something notable is that the deputy. attorney general, Todd Blanch, has come. out and basically said, "Sure, there. were 6 million documents. What you're. getting are 3 million documents." And. so, are are you satisfied that it seems.

like the DOJ is basically wiping their. hands of this thing after giving half of. what was ultimately promised? >> No. And Massie and I are going to meet. Blanch. He said he's open to meeting us. But here's what I want folks to put into. context. The 50% that have been released. is so disturbing, so concerning about. how wealthy and powerful people in this. country acted. Imagine what is in the. files that they haven't released. I.

mean, this is a scandal that basically. goes to the heart of this country. rich. and powerful people were getting away. with going to Epstein's Island with. watching the abuse of underage girls. Uh. and so we're going to fight to get. everything out uh especially given that. uh there's they're concealing things. >> In terms of what we have seen thus far, I think something that was especially. striking for me was Elon Musk's.

involvement in all of this. Did can I. have any reaction from from your vantage. on what we saw from Elon Musk given the. fact that the first indication that. Trump was even in the files was from. Elon himself only for us now to be able. to see that he was negotiating. helicopter rides to go back and forth. There was one point on Christmas day. either on in 2013 or 2014 where he was. trying to figure out what time he would. come the following week on January 2nd. or 3rd. And so just your general. reaction to the fact that Elon is so.

prevalent here. >> Well, it's uh totally shocking. I mean, because Musk said, "Release the files. Trump is in it." Well, it turns out Musk. is in them. And uh Musk is saying that. uh when is the party uh he's talking. about visiting the island? And look, there are so many big uh tech names. Peter Teal, uh uh Bill Gates, others. were in this. And it's like there was. some fraternity. If you were a. billionaire and successful in America uh.

and uh you were a famous politician, then somehow you were connected to. Epstein and somehow you wanted to go to. these parties on Epstein's island. knowing he was a pedophile. I mean, let's be very clear, this is after he. was convicted of pedophilia, knowing. that there could be underage girls. there. So, this is just such a. staggering uh scandal. I mean, imagine. the the average American thinking that. all these people who run the country, business leaders, politicians, are.

showing up at a pedophile's island. Uh, some of them engaging in gratification. with underage girls, some of them raping. underage girls, some of them trafficking. in these women, and some of them just. standing around in the parties knowing. what's going on. It it it is disgusting. Well, I think I think something that's. almost as disgusting as that is the fact. that far from that being a disqualifying. factor, you know, you're being invoked. in these Epstein files, is the fact that. even now it still seems to be completely.

acceptable for these people to fill the. highest ranks of power. I mean, uh, uh, Worsh, who is Trump's pick to be the new. Fed chair, his name was in the Epstein. files. Howard Lutnik, his name is in the. Epstein files. And so it's not some not. some bygon thing of a bygone era where. we had all of the where we had past. tense all of these people at the highest. echelons of government who were in some. way involved with Jeffrey Epstein. It's. still happening. It's right in front of. us. I mean how many people in Trump's. administration or Trump's orbit from. Trump himself to Steve Bannon again.

Lutnik Worsh there are so many people. even now who are in the highest echelons. of power uh who are still hiding some. you know some some association with. Jeffrey Epste. So recognizing that that. gives me very little confidence that. these people are actually going to be. willing to release what the files. actually show or the full breadth of. these files because it's not just that. there's some nebulous blob of people. that are that that Trump and his orbit. are trying to protect. The Trump orbit.

is the nebulous blob of people in part. that they're trying to protect. Well, Brian, you uh nailed it on what. survivors tell me and why survivors. lawyers are so concerned. It's not that. they need closure for something that. happened in the past. It's that they are. seeing the people uh on the island who. were part of this network who may have. uh raped them or trafficked them uh on. their TV sets being lionized,

celebrated, still holding power in. American society. and their view is that. the entire Epstein class needs to go. But it is why I don't have confidence. that there has been a full release. It's. why I want to see what this 50% of. documents that even Blanch says have. hasn't been released. What what is in. them? Uh why are they more concerned. about redactions that protect some of. these rich and powerful men than they. are actually protecting victim's.

identity? It's going to take a new. president to actually prosecute some of. this. Remember the prosecution is. statute of limitations is 5 years or uh. to uh to release all the files but we. are going to continue to fight uh to get. this done and the the scandal is beyond. Trump. But it it's just this sense that. the highest, richest, wealthiest people. in our society were getting away with. the most heinous thing. And it it feeds. this narrative in this country that. people intuitively sense, which is that.

the rich and powerful have a rigged game. going on and that ordinary Americans. don't have the same uh sense of justice. and they don't certainly have the same. stake of success in this country. You. know, I spoke with uh with Congressman. Rascin, and he said that uh that he. would be meeting with Deputy Attorney. General Todd Blanch to discuss uh to. discuss the prospect of viewing the. unredacted files because we have so many. redactions in these files that the DOJ. did did actually dain to give over. So,

not notwithstanding the 3 million. documents that haven't been handed over. yet and probably aren't going to be. handed over by this DOJ, even the. documents that were put forward included. a ton of redactions. And so are you. going to be involved in any way in that. that whole effort u uh at the hands of. Jamie Rascin to get some answers on what. has been redacted thus far? >> Absolutely. Uh we will coordinate with. Jamie Raskin, but Thomas Massie and I. also will be meeting Blanch. Uh and we. want to know why some of these.

redactions took place, what is in those. files, uh how can we get the maximum. information to be released, and why some. of the 302 forms still haven't been. released. the survivors naming these. powerful men uh and why uh survivors. names were not redacted while these men. are still being protected. The my north. star is what the survivors and survivors. lawyers say and they are still very. disappointed with the release. They. acknowledge that this is the most. significant release uh that has taken.

place uh over decades. uh they in some. sense didn't even think that we'd get. this far, but you know, they think it's. this is a tactic for uh justice to say, "Look, we did gave you quite a lot. Now, just leave us alone and then we don't. get the most nuclear information, the. the things that may prove criminal. wrongdoing and that really will uh. disgust Americans.". >> I I want to say two things. Uh, one is a. question, but before I get to that. question, you know, the the fact that we.

have gotten these documents thus far, um, the three million documents is in. large part a testament to the work that. you and Thomas Massie have done. So, I. just want to I just want to put that out. there for folks who are even even, you. know, surprised at the fact that we've. gotten these documents. It would not. have happened without the work that you. guys have done. So, I just want to say. thanks, you know, on behalf of myself. and everybody watching this right now. But the second point that I want to make. is, you know, you and I have spoken in. the past about, okay, you have people. like Todd Blanch saying that no one's. going to be prosecuted as the result of. this. And and in fact, that's been kind.

of the line we've heard all along from. Dan Bonino and Cash Mattel that. apparently there was this whole sex. trafficking ring, but nobody that the. girls were sex trafficked to. That part. is just completely nebulous. There's. just just Jeffrey Epste and and then and. then a black hole. Thousands of girls. I. I've also asked you about the fact that. like why not just have the survivors. come out and start naming names? Like if. if the DOJ isn't going to do it, if. they're going to be so hellbent on. protecting these people, why not go to. the primary sources and have them speak.

out? And you rightfully noted that, you. know, for the same reason that the DOJ. feels compelled to protect these. powerful and wealthy people. The. survivors are reticent to name these. powerful and wealthy people. And so is. there going to come a point where that. remains a possibility? Um obviously with. the with with whatever protection or. backing needs to come with it that that. is a stop gap solution in the event the. DOJ truly truly doesn't comply and we go. three more years at the hands of Pam.

Bondi where we just don't get any more. documents. >> The reality is that uh these survivors. would be sued. It's not theoretical. We. know Alan Dersawitz went after Virginia. Guthrie with a vengeance and uh made her. life miserable and and Virginia Guthrie. today isn't with us. So they they know. that they would face the wrath uh of uh. these powerful billionaires. Uh and. >> would they just be sued because of like. the the the people who they name would.

just sue them for defamation for. example? >> That's what that's what Alan Durwood. did. They would just be sued for. defamation. They'd be so for causing. pain and suffering, reputational damage, and so. >> Oh, yes. Won't Won't Won't Won't Won't. Won't Won't Won't Won't Won't Won't. Won't Won't Won't Won't Won't Won't. Won't Won't Won't Won't someone look out. for the uh the the poor innocent uh. perpetrators of these crimes? That. that's that's that's who would be uh. that's who's pain who's dealing with. pain and suffering. >> I mean, it's it's shocking, but the the. scales of justice so far have made it. easier for Durowitz to prevail, and. Virginia Gut is no longer with us. Yeah.

>> And so the the reality is we now know. that people's have been reputationally. challenged based on already the release, right? We've seen the files of people. asking to go to the Epstein island of. people uh talking about wild parties. about people corresponding uh in banter. with Epstein knowing he's a pedophile. But what we don't have yet is the. survivors basically statements or notes. saying this person trafficked me. this.

person raped me. That is in the files. and the question is how do we get that. out? Why is it being protected? Yes, I. guess we we could find other ways of. getting this out. The survivors have. said they they may publish an anonymous. list or other things, but there's no. reason that we have to go that route. We. should just get these files. And the. hope is, you know, for all those people. saying, "Oh, this is a hoax." You know, some people are now saying, "Wow, there. were a lot of people involved that I. didn't even think." Some people are.

surprised on our side. They thought it. maybe it just be Trump and Trump's. associates. They didn't think it was. that farreaching. And so, I think it's. just going to build more demand to get a. total cleansing in this country to have. this Epstein class go to get the rest of. the files and to really understand how. we had a rotten elite in America. I'm. going to ask you a a pretty easy one. here and that is the the push back or. the narrative that's being woven on the. right is this idea that you know what. Trump is actually the hero of this story.

because zero files were released during. the Biden era and now we've got three. million files released during the Trump. era. So what would your reaction to that. be? >> I don't know if Trump still realized he. signed a Democrat's law. I mean he I. don't think he understands that is the. Epstein transparency act that I wrote. and then Massie did the discharge. petition for and he opposed at every. step of the way. I mean Marjorie Taylor. Green gave up her career in Congress. because of Donald Trump threatening her. and endorsing someone who was going to. run against her. And so you had him step.

after step after step try to avoid the. release. Then we forced the thing to. pass the House. Uh he because he would. have lost Republicans. We forced it to. go through the Senate 100 to zero. It. wasn't just us. It was of course the. survivors and he had to sign it with. being pushed into that and then they. tried to not release anything. And you. remember December 19th, they had a total. fluff release. I mean, it was nothing. It wasn't like this where at least they.

released significant. So, they've. resisted at every step of the way. But, you know, at the end of the day, I don't. really care about the credit. I what I. care about is that the files are. released, that the survivors have. justice, and that we start to have a. truth and reconciliation almost process. in this country where people are held. accountable who committed these heinous. acts of crimes or moral uh depravity. I. mean, my view is if you said you want to. go to Epstein's Island knowing that. Jeffrey Epste's a pedophile, even if you. didn't rape an underage girl, if you.

were there knowing that underage girls. were being raped, then there's something. seriously lacking in your moral judgment. and moral core and you should not have. any part of being celebrated in by. society, >> right? I mean, a lot of the emails that. we saw, including the ones from Elon. Musk, were from the early 2010s. Jeffrey. Epstein had already been charged in 2005. or 2006 with sex trafficking of a minor. And so it was no secret what he was. doing or who he was. And so you're. exactly right. These people have no.

excuse to have been even in. communication with this guy recognizing. uh who he is or what he did. Last. question here, Congressman. As we've. gotten to this point, which again I. think is is a huge victory in and of. itself, I fear that it will just get. harder and harder. Um because you know. whatever you you said it right at the. top the what has been released thus far. is already bad enough which suggests. that what hasn't been released is. exponentially worse. Do you have. confidence that in the in the remainder.

of the Trump administration we will see. the full files released. >> It's going to be a fight. I think this. is a very deliberate strategy. It shows. how weak their hand was. They were. getting uh disciplined or reprimanded by. Judge Engelmare. we were filing. lawsuits. Uh they were losing public. opinion. So, I think they came up with a. strategy. Let's give them something. substantial, but not let's but not give. them the worst. So, now it's harder uh. for a survivor to go to a court and say,

"Well, they're only releasing 1%." And a. judge will say, "No, they released 50%.". And they've released some pretty. terrible things. And we have to say, "No, but they're hiding the worst of. it." But I do believe that uh we will. prevail on getting more. And the reason. is that the courts, Judge Angelmire and. Judge Burman, have been pretty. sympathetic to what Massie and I have. said, what survivors have said. The. public opinion, I think, is going to. demand it uh even more after what's come. out. Uh and ultimately, the survivors.

who are the real heroes of this, they're. saying it's not enough. So, we have got. to continue to go forward. We've got to. recognize this is about something very. deep, which is that rich and powerful. people in America have been getting away. with things at the expense of uh. ordinary Americans. And uh this is the. time to restore faith in democracy by. holding the elites, a rotten elite, accountable. Well, look, again, uh I'll. repeat it as many times as I can. That. that that effort uh in large part would. not have happened if it wasn't for the.

work that that you've been doing. So, I. appreciate uh the time as always. we've. come to kind of make this a standing. weekend thing. So, I'm sure I I'll be. speaking to you in a few days and. hopefully we have more updates moving. forward. So, Congressman, with that. said, thanks again for uh for the time. >> Thank you. And thank you, Brian. I mean, the credit is of course first to the. survivors, but you deserve credit as. well because if it weren't for. independent media, if it weren't for the. pressure and holding the bogus releases. accountable, uh we wouldn't have gotten. to this stage. And I I you and others.

like you give me confidence that this. story isn't going away and we're going. to get truth and justice. >> I'm joined now by the co-host of Pave. America, Dan Feifer. Dan, thanks for. joining me. >> Happy to see you, Brian. >> So, we've just watched as the Democratic. candidate defeated a Republican in a. district that Donald Trump won just last. year by 17 points and they did so by 14. points, meaning it's a 32point swing. Already we've seen some Republicans. coming out and offering some excuses. like this is, you know, a low turnout. election because, you know, it's special.

election, we're in an off year. How much. of a problem are these election results. in Texas uh for the GOP as we head. toward midterms? >> Look, I I've said many many times over. the years that special elections are not. particularly predictive. They are things. where Democrats tend to do better. because our election our coalition is. now disproportionately made up of people. who vote all the time. Um, and as we saw. in 2024, Republicans benefit from higher. turnout. And sometimes when you get. results that are shocking, it's because, you know, one party got caught napping.

or, as you mentioned, it's a really low. turnout election. That's not what. happened here, right? The Trump endorsed. the Republican. The Republican party. spent money in this race. The Republican. outspent the Democrat by several fold, and the Democrat still won. And so if. you're on the ballot anywhere in Texas. or frankly around the country, this is. should scare the crap out of you because. not are not saying that we're going to. get a plus 31 plus 32 Democratic. environment, but this just means that a.

whole bunch of races that were not on. the map before are on the map now. Can. you talk about the fact that you know. this this electorate was 51% Republican, 35% Democrat and 14% independent, but. the Democratic candidate Teller Remmit. won with like 57% of the vote. And so. mathematically the only way to have done. that is to is to have gotten votes uh. and support from Republican voters and. independent voters. I mean, how are you. thinking about that as we as we move.

forward? That's the part that should. really scare Republicans because a lot. of times when you see these Democratic. results, sometimes you'll see it like. it's a state house race in Montana in a. district, Trump won by 36, the Democrat. loses by 12, and then you look at the. results and you see there's just this. massively disproportionate Democratic. turnout. Just our our party turned out. at insane levels. Not enough to to win. sometimes in districts, but to make them. races much closer than they are. That. [snorts] is absolutely not what happened. here. This district, this district is in. Tarant County. It is the epicenter of.

the Texas Republican party. It's sort of. a power center for the MAGA movement, the the far-right Christian movement. And the only the way that the Democrat. won is yes, we had great turnout from. the Democratic base, but because. persuaded basically every independent. who voted to vote for the Democrat and a. decent chunk of Republicans and that and. and notably also as well, this is. important. I think this is you can see. this in the independent numbers is there. are a number of heavily Latino precincts. in this district and from the early. results we've seen and we you know have.

to get some more granular detail but it. seems like in math would suggest that. the Latino vote swung back hard to the. Democrats. >> and and I think that poses a pretty. serious problem for Republicans as we. move forward because they built their. new map that would give them five new. seats on this idea predicated on this. idea that Latinos swinging super heavily. to theublic Republicans and Trump in. 2024 was a permanent move. And and and. that's how they built their gerrymander. And so we could we could be in a world. where not only do we not see five seats.

get handed from Democrats to. Republicans, but if if those margins. were drawn so thin and we see a big blue. wave election, not just where we're. seeing high turnout from Democrats, but. where we're seeing um Republicans and. independents defect and vote for the. Democratic candidates in numbers that we. saw just yesterday. We we could see a. world where this new map turns into a. dummy mander and actually Democrats net. seats from Texas. >> This map still remains pretty hard. because they did a pretty good job of. fortifying some of their members as they.

did this. But the Democrats are trying. to vote out uh along the border um like. Henry Quay Vicente Gonzalez with if the. Republicans are really suffering this. much with Latinos in Texas, those races. are not going to be competitive. And. there some of the new districts they. drew depend heavily on this. So, we. could draw even here potentially, you. know, uh obviously if you have a plus 31. uh Democratic advantage, we're going to. crush everywhere across Texas, across. the country, we'll pick up, you know, 70.

80 seats or whatever that would be. But. the Republicans made a bet here and that. bet, you know, not only did it not last. for a generation, it didn't even last. for a year. We we also, I'm sure, both saw the. numbers of, you know, in terms of the uh. expenditures um in this campaign. I'm. going to put right up here on the screen. an image that Amanda Litman shared, uh. the founder of Run for Something. This. image right here shows like the massive. disparity that we have between what the. Republicans had and what the Democrats. had. And yet still, you had a Democratic. candidate flip this seat by 32 points.

from what we saw in 2024. What does that. suggest moving forward that even a. boatload of money wasn't enough to win. this race for the GOP? >> Yeah, I mean it's it speaks to their. problem because in these special. elections, this is what we saw happen in. uh the district in Tennessee, Tennessee. 7 late last year, is. >> the party with the with the partisan. advantage can usually hold on and win. because they have enough money to tell. voters the election is happening. Um, and this time they had that money and it. did not work because it wasn't that they.

they told Republicans to vote and then. some of those Republicans and all those. independents voted against the. Republican. The other thing I think is. important here and I think this provides. larger context for how much the polit. politics have shift is shifted over the. last few months is so this was a runoff. election. The original election what. happened in November and in in November. when you added up all the Republicans. and the Democrats the dem the. Republicans had a fivepoint advantage. right which was very good for the. Democrat meant we they were in striking. distance is why some people had this. election like on their radar screen and.

so it shifted dramatically from five. point to a 14-point Democratic advantage. over the since November to now and that. says a lot about you know we can't. attribute this entirely to what's. happening in Minnesota ICE Venezuela all. of the things that have been happening. with Trump over the last few months, but. it does speak to how fired up Democrats. have gotten over the last few weeks and. how disillusioned Republicans have. gotten and so delusioned that they'll. vote against the Republican. >> What do you think that principal driver. is? And and by the way, I I say this. knowing that it may very well not be one. specific thing, but but these are pretty.

huge numbers and especially the. defection numbers are are are what I'm. looking at. >> Yeah, it is. There's nothing that would. suggest that there would be this huge. increase in an in and people upset with. Trump over affordability from November. to now. Um, and the thing that's really. changed is just that this feeling of. chaos that is sort of permeating the. country because of what's been happening. in Minnesota and Maine and elsewhere. And so, you know, we I really am. hesitant to speculate because you really. there's no exit polls here. We don't. know what was on top of people's minds.

But I don't think you can separate the. shift from November till now from what's. happening in the larger political. environment and that's been defined by. ICE in Minnesota for you know almost a. month now. >> So I guess the question becomes does. Trump see this and and kind of like. shift gears or because it's Trump. because any any you know uh uh. concession to the other side is viewed. as capitulation which is viewed as. weakness. He's not he's never going to. do that. And so what do you expect to. see as far as Trump is concerned? Do you. think that that he he uses this and says.

like, "Okay, we have to change course a. little bit or just triple down?". >> I you know, you just you know, I think. it's like one step forward, two steps. backwards all the time with Trump. Like. maybe he'll feel like maybe he'll call. Tom Hman today and be like, "Slow it. down." And then the next day Steven. Miller will be in his ear and we'll do. the opposite. So, you don't really know. I think where it has some impact is on. Republicans as we debate in Congress. what sort of ICE uh guardrails can be. put into the spending bill. There's a. world where in a different political.

environment the Republicans be relishing. a shutdown of the of the Department of. Homeland Security and ICE. And the fact. that they're not and that Mike Johnson, the speaker of the house, is going to. bend over backwards to try to get this. bill passed on Monday or Tuesday speaks. to I think just the increasing political. pressure on this issue. >> What about from Democrats vantage? I'm. I'm seeing a lot of posts and statements. um from, you know, Hakee Jeff and Ken. Martin and Chuck Schumer that they are, you know, look, I I think if I was in. their position too, I would I would also.

be taking credit for what's happening. right now. And and frankly, at the end. of the day, they are in charge. So, they. can take credit, but but also I'm just. curious because, you know, on one hand, there is obviously a lot of anti-Trump. sentiment, if not all anti-Trump. sentiment that's driving this. And so to. what extent do you think that Democrats. should or could take credit here versus. are just kind of coasting off of what. we're seeing Trump do and reaping the. benefits of that? >> I think most of what has been happening, almost all the positive things that have. happened in terms of resisting Trump of.

sort of sending a message Trump have. happened from outside of Washington, not. inside of Washington, from the bottom. up, not the top down. >> I think the the DNC spent money here, they should uh get credit for doing. that. If the Democratic Legislative. Committee spent money here, they should. get credit for doing that. But the. reality of what's happening is happening. on the ground and it's happening in. spite of not because of leadership from. Washington. >> And so is there some concern that we'll. kind of like ping pong back and forth.

that because because some of the. leadership in the Democratic party is. going to look at this and say, "We fixed. it. You know, the the brand is fixed. We're we're winning again. We can take. all this credit. We don't have to. release any any autopsies. like we'll. just keep doing what we're doing and. keep on keeping on and you know kind of. end up in a situation where okay we. haven't really done anything. substantively to fix the Democratic. brand but they've seen all these wins. and so they get the wrong message out of. it. Uh and then you know we're in a. position where Democrats have control. and all of the things that led them to.

lose in 2024 rear their heads again. because they were never actually. rectified. >> Yeah. So I think there's a couple of. things that are going to happen in the. interim. I think in the short term this. election victory is going to put stiffen. some Democrats spines for to use the. limited leverage they have in these. negotiations over ICE guard rails. I. think it will encourage more Democrats. to speak out more boldly about what's. happened with ICE. Although I think for. the most part they've been pretty good. since uh the killings of Renee Good and. Alex Prey. Um not everyone but for the. most part you're getting less heming and.

hawing from Democrats about what is h. what Trump is doing and what IC is. doing. So that's good. So I think it. stiffens the spines. I think the big. concern is if we have a very good 2026, does the party make the same mistake. they made after 2022 and view that as a. validation of themselves as opposed to a. response to something else? Right? 2022. was about dos, not a show of support for. Joe Biden. Joe the Biden White House and. a lot of Democrats read that as the the.

wrong way. And so I think I've I could. go on and on and on about the the. medium-term and long-term challenges the. Democratic party has regardless of what. happens in 2026, but we have a ton of. work to do. And so the hope is you um we. have a great year. We recognize that. that that we benefited greatly from. anger against Trump prices being high, but once we get into an actual election. where a Democrat presidential candidate. is on the ballot against Republican. presidential candidate in that much. larger electorate that that doomed us in.

2024, we got some real work to do. >> And to to that end, in terms of uh what. what we can hope to accomplish as we. head toward midterms, where's your head. at? Obviously, I think we're all kind of. aligned on the House, but where is your. head at on the Senate? >> You know, I feel. I am cautiously optimistic about the. Senate. I think look, you see these. results in Texas that should give you. even additional belief that there is a. path to a Senate seat in Texas with the. right candidate running the right. campaign. But you know the political.

environment if it is in our favor we. have shots. Like I think we can defend. all of our incumbents. Not easy, right? Like we have to we have to keep we have. to win our open seat in New Hampshire, win our open seat in Minnesota. We have. to win an open seat in Michigan, which. is the toughest of them all. And John. Oaf's got to get re-elected. Those are. all about as good as you would expect. them to be at this exact point. We have. good candidates in all those races, and. the Republicans aren't awesome in those. races. Although, in Michigan, I think. Mike Rogers is going to be is hard to. beat. Not impossible, but he's he's, you.

know, he almost won in 2024. Um, and. then we got to do well in we got to win. in North Carolina. We have a great. candidate. And we got to win in Maine. where we, you know, we have a primary. coming [snorts] and, you know, because. those are the purplish states. And then. we got to win two of what I think is now. five red states. Um, so you you were. talking about Ohio with shared brown. We. are talking about Texas. We were talking. about Alaska with Mary Poto. We were. talking about Iowa. We have a bunch of. candidates. All interesting on paper. We'll see how they look as we go through.

this primary. Um, and then you you know. I think there is an interesting question. about Florida. Like Florida is a very. very hard state. Um, you know, we now have Alexander Vidman. running. He's a candidate who raised a. ton of money on the first day. I'm. always skeptical of a candidate who is. like very famous to the resistance crowd. is 100% Iowa, you know, MSNBC America. name ID. But I here's the thing I'd say. Florida is Trump won Florida by the same. amount he won uh Texas by.

>> Yeah. >> Um and so like we should keep an eye on. it and possibly you know the Republican. is could not be more generic. It's the. it's the it's the woman who took Marco. Rubio's seat. No one has any idea who. she is. She's a generic Republican is. not what you want to be these days. Um, so like let's keep an eye on like. basically we want as many paths to 52 as. we can to 51 as we can get and that's. another potential one and that's not. even talking we haven't even really. brought up Nebraska where you have. independent Dan Osborne running um. against Pete Ricketts. >> Yeah. Well, a lot to a lot to look.

forward. Look, I I want to say for for. everybody who's watching listening right. now um the best analysis online is from. Dan on message box which is his. newsletter. I could not recommend highly. enough that if you've not yet subscribed. to to message box, please go ahead and. do so. I'm going to put that link right. here on the screen and also in the post. description of this video. It is the. smartest analysis, the best analysis, and it is always correct. So, just go. ahead and do that. Thank you, Brian. >> Go ahead and subscribe if you're not yet. subscribed and uh and I'll put that link. again right here on the screen and also.

in the post description. Dan, as always, thanks for the time. >> Always good to talk to you, buddy. >> A few days ago, Trump's DOJ continued. its assault on the First Amendment by. arresting journalist Don Lemon. Now, fortunately, he's been released and we. are lucky enough to be able to speak. with him in one of his first discussions. post arrest. So, obviously, there's a. lot to talk about, but the real question. is, how are you doing? How how how has. everything been in the aftermath of what. I presume has been kind of a a whirlwind. last 48 or 72 hours here? >> You know what, that's a really great. question, Brian. Um, and I think a fair.

answer. Would you be surprised if I say. it if I said I don't know? No, I mean that you know look it's it's. I I I I think anything other than that. would have been you know uh would have. been difficult difficult to believe. I. mean I mean talk about highs and lows. from from what happened just a few days. ago to obviously you know there was a. very viral clip of of you at the Grammys. and so I'm curious like what what was. what was the reception like for for you. in a room with all of those people? You.

know, look, not notwithstanding the fact. that that there are folks in the. entertainment industry, but you know, these are people who who who fight to to. push back against against the excesses. and abuses of this administration on on. a daily basis. And and you are literally. on the front lines. >> Yeah. And you heard that. I mean, look, they were not shy about their criticism. of this administration at the Grammys, right? Right. and and some major artists. and usually as of late we've seen people. trying to you know you know move away. from politics in this but they were very. open uh to speaking about it and usually.

when I cover these things like the. Grammys or something like that you know. I'm not looking to talk to them about. politics or foreign policy or anything. like that you know it's it's you know. things that have to relate to the. industry like last year at the Grammys. we talked about the fires and they were. raising money for people with the fires. and of course there were other things. that sometimes they bring up uh but this. year people were very focused on ice and. were wearing you know, the ice out. buttons, um, and just not really shying. away from it. >> No one is illegal on stolen land. I.

guess I want to say I'm up here as a. granddaughter of an immigrant. I. wouldn't be here. [cheering]. [applause]. Um, yeah, I'm a product of bravery and I. think those people deserve to be. celebrated. >> It's inhumane. I don't recognize my. country at this moment right now. I'm. going to say. eyes out. [cheering]. >> But for me, Brian, what this is is.

freedom. It's the first amendment. and. you know and art artists are I think. some of the you know artists and. obviously journalists are the the true. um sort of examples of the first. amendment at its finest and what it's. supposed to be right and I believe. artists and journalists if you know if. journalists. >> especially corporate journalists sort of. do some selfcorrection they could. actually save our democracy in in this. moment and so that's why I wanted to.

talk to I'm glad you brought that up but. it was it was a little odd first of all. being the story, right? I don't like. being the story, but if I'm going to. have to be the story, then I I, you. know, I want to conduct myself properly. and I want to make sure that I stand up. for what is right. But that's why I. wanted to talk to you because you're an. example of journalism, of the the. freedom of the press, um especially now. that we're in this independent space and. um you know, we we are close to the.

ground. we don't have the corporate. filters and I think it's important that. we bring people the information um. without fear of favor and without it. being filtered through gatekeepers. You. know, I I I was thinking about I've been. thinking about this a lot and and of. course I have friends and family as I'm. sure you do who constantly bring up this. idea of like are are you worried? What. about the administration going after. you? And I think like we've all been. asked that question especially by our. loved ones. But I think the alternative. to not speaking up and not, you know,

leaning 10 toes in is okay, you kind of. take a take a back seat, allow this. administration to censor you and silence. you. And of course, they're doing it. without without much push back as far as. legacy media is concerned. And they're. doing it without without push back with. tech CEOs and universities and law firms. and other world leaders. And so if he. has kind of a glide path to just full. censorship, think about what's on the. other side of that. I mean that is what. true like autocracy looks like. And so. we're a bull work here that and so you.

know not saying anything is is even. worse because then we end up in an. administration or or a regime really. where Trump has achieved what he wants. because he's he's successfully quashed. any disscent and that doesn't leave us. any more safe. And so while this might. be a dangerous and and difficult. position, and you can speak to that more. than anybody at this point, the. alternative is so much worse. And so. there is an obligation and a duty to. continue doing this this work no matter. what like the the dangers are. And.

again, you you can you know, you can. attest to that better than anybody. >> Yeah. But listen, not I don't want to be. selfish about this because I know that. you have a much broader answer which. you've kind of touched on and what you. were just saying, but when you heard. about what happened to me and to the. other journalists, what did you think, Brian? >> Look, I I the the sad part is I I wasn't. surprised. Um it it kind of feels like a. matter of time the fact that Trump is. going down this list. I mean, he started. with Leticia James and James Comey and.

uh and you know, Adam Schiff is on there. and then he moves over to like Tim Walls. and Jacob Fry and he's arrested judges. and we've seen Padilla get arrested and. so it's, you know, >> not to mention suing, don't forget suing. journalists and suing news, >> suing journalists, suing the New York. Times, suing I mean anybody you know who. CBS and Paramount and uh ABC for $16. million and. >> and I I think he has been successful in.

normalizing us to this idea that that. this is just what happens in the United. States. And and that's the part I want. to push back against because like we. cannot become accustomed to this idea. where the president of the United States. just sues people or silences people or. wields his FCC against comedians for the. crime of telling jokes. And and I think. that what what kind of heartened me to. see was like all of the push back left, right, and center against what had. happened to you. And uh and and that. needs to happen every single time. Like.

that cannot diminish just because oh, we've seen this before. Was was that. something that that surprised you? Um. you know, to see all of the push back. even in a world where everybody kind of. expects Trump to go after his enemies? >> Well, I got to Yes. the the very simple. answer or straightforward answer to your. question is yes. And can you imagine. though we're so connected to our. devices, right? Especially in what we. do. We're there and we're like, "Oh, well, we got to report it. This is what. we do. We have some breaking news or. this just happened." And imagine not.

having any communications. for, you know, 12 hours, right? And so I. had no idea what was going on in the. world. None. until I walked out and when. I saw the scrum of cameras and news. people there, I was floored. I was like, "Really? Are you kidding me?" I had no. idea. And I was very pleasantly. surprised. I mean, there were. helicopters following me like I was OJ. Simpson on the interstate. It was crazy. [snorts] But I had no idea until I got. to um, you know, to my friend's house.

where I'm staying and I looked at the. news coverage and I said, "Holy shit.". >> It was the biggest It was the biggest. story probably in the world. >> Yeah. at that. Yeah. >> But I mean, like, how how bizarre that. that even while you're in there, you. have no idea. And you could have very. well walked out to, you know, one or two. people and and, you know, God knows how. many other things could have happened. that day that just might have, you know, taken all the attention, sucked up all. the oxygen. >> Yeah. But I wondered, Brian, and you can. answer this better than I can. I think. I'm too close to it. Is this the thing.

that gets people to say, especially. journalism and the media, and I'm not. talking about the corporate bosses. because they still want to make their. money and they still want their mergers. and acquisitions, but for the journalist. to say, "Okay, enough already. I I I. can't do this. I can't have the false. equivalence. I can't do it." And just. before you answer, I say maybe it is because people who I. didn't have such great relationships. with and for for what whatever reasons, I don't know why, um, you know, professional jealousy or competition or.

whatever reached out and said, you know, I know we haven't been friendly lately, but I just want to tell you this is. up and I'm sorry this happened to. you and I'd love to like sit down and. have a drink with you soon. So, is this. a thing? Maybe. I I would love if that. would happen. That just gets journalists. to say, "Fuck no, we're not doing this. anymore.". >> Look, I I I hope so. And I think for two. reasons. One, this isn't about like this. isn't about whether somebody agrees with. you or your coverage. This is about this.

is about the precedent that it. establishes moving forward. And I think. Republicans are starting to realize that. if Trump establishes precedences that. could turn around and bite them in the. ass forward. I mean like there I think. that that's a very pronounced worry for. them. Like this idea of of okay, so. everybody here in the right-wing media. ecosystem is going to just sit idly by. and be silent as this happens. What can. happen when we have a Democratic.

president in office? And I think that's. been a worry for them as they see things. get like the abuses grow more and more. On the flip side, look, there are always. going to be people for whom Trump can do. no wrong and and we've seen some of them. too. And you know, the the reality is. that that those people would would. sacrifice their firstborn if Trump asked. them to. And so I think that we're. seeing a growing dichotomy between, you. know, the the slavish devotees to Trump, these people on right-wing media who are. just going to be his mouthpieces no. matter what. No matter what ICE agents,

uh, you know, what what crimes they. commit or who they shoot or what. journalists they arrest, those people. are always going to be on board. But. there's a growing there's a growing um. disparity between those people and and. even the people they speak with, like. even just any even right-wing regular. Americans. And I think that they're. recognizing, oh, that's that shit's. cultish behavior, you know, like that's. that's not necessarily reflective of me. Maybe in 2024 things felt a little bit. different. I I could I could align. myself with a more right-wing.

government, right-wing campaign, but. like this is what right-wing governance. looks like in action. And if that's if. that's what it looks like, where you've. got, you know, Caroline Levit basically. doing her best uh uh North Korea lady. impression on a daily basis, is like I I. don't know. I I I'm I'm seeing people. get more and more uncomfortable with. that on on a daily basis. >> You're you're very astute. Right on. Because the people I spoke to even at. the Grammys said to me, uh, "Hey, look, I'm a Republican. I don't like what. happened to you. That's not right. Uh,

I'm a conservative. I voted for Donald. Trump and um I don't necessarily agree. with everything that you say, but this. is wrong and I'm in your corner on this. one." I'm seeing that from I I don't. hear that a lot coming from uh. conservatives now. The the Magaf Fate. Bowl and you know the crazy people of. the world uh like God is that like the. Benny Johnson's and the Megan Kelly's or. whatever who just are grifting out there. on the right. They're going to keep you. know fueling the fire and and and and. and putting gasoline on the fire because.

that's how they get clicks and ratings, right? Or well, I don't know money. But. I think for most sensible people, whether you're a conservative or not, you realize like we need a we need a an. independent free press. >> Yeah. You know what was so interesting, I think, about uh the Grammys was just a. year ago, I mean, these people wouldn't. be caught dead talking about about. politics, but certainly not like some. aligning themselves with liberal. politics. It became so out of vogue to.

to align yourself with the left. I mean, look, I'm I'm I'm I'm a I'm a I'm a. Democrat. Like, it's it's I would be the. the it's it [clears throat] sucks that I. have to admit it, but but you know, it. was it was toxic. It was cultural. suicide to uh to align yourself with the. Democrats or some Democratic or. progressive position just a year ago. And and that that's what that's what. gave birth to all of these manosphere. podcasts. And I mean it the Democrats. had lost culture and that which was. bizarre to say because I grew up like in.

the Barack Obama era and he was cool and. we had George W. Bush was decidedly. uncool and and I think in one fell swoop. we saw so much of that snap back and and. politics is downstream of culture and. you have all of these you know all of. these big names and and voices and and. popular ones. I mean, musicians even. even have like a more prominent role in. society than than even actors do, right? >> Yeah. and and for all of those people to. be so unapologetically.

outspoken in terms of um in terms of. pushing back against what this. administration is doing was was a was a. really like heartening thing to see. because again like I I I didn't know. when when culture would would swing back. to the left and I think we saw it happen. thanks to Trump way faster than anybody. anticipated. We were talking about some. of those uh the manosphere and now I'm. seeing people like um is it Andrew. Schultz? Is that his name? >> Andrew Schultz. Oh yeah. He's just you. just you just know he's like in pain.

right now and and as well he look go on. >> No, I want you to finish that. But like. he didn't realize that this was going to. happen. I mean he supported him. He had. him on the on on his show and they were. talking him and Charlemagne. So all of. these people and and the other folks on. and now they're surprised that Donald. Trump is doing what he's doing. Like. really like come on. >> surprised that the guy who who who. wielded like mass deportation now signs. at his rallies is doing mass. deportations. I mean like there there is.

no world in which you had almost 80. million people who saw this coming, but. you have like six or seven who. had no clue that any of this. could could come about. like the whole. like half the country, a whole half of. the country was yelling about this exact. thing happening. But now you've got, you. know, Andrew Schultz and Joe Rogan who. had no idea this was coming. And you can. you can hear in their voices how they. kind of just have their tails between. their legs now as this stuff happens and. they have to talk about it because they.

host shows and the subtext to everything. is like, well, you know, I was I this. guy was sitting across uh across the. table from me as I was, you know, basically filating him for my audience. M that's vivid. [laughter]. >> Was that for some imagery? Is that for. some uh for some imagery for you? >> Thank you for that, Brian. No, look, I I. am I'm surprised. Here's the thing. That. shows you that not everybody with a. microphone should be talking about. politics, especially if you don't these. these people have no idea about politics. and policy. Why are they doing it there?

Look, they're comedians. You can talk. Look, it's a obviously freedom of. speech, but sometimes things are so. important that you have to leave the. expert opinion to the experts. You know. what I'm saying? >> Um, and not everybody's meant to. interview a presidential candidate or a. president. And if you are if you don't. believe that you are. I I don't know maybe you should realize. maybe you should have some um some. [sighs].

enough self-awareness to realize like. maybe this is beyond I should leave this. to the journalist. You know what I'm. saying? >> Yeah. I mean look there there I think. these people are learning that there are. consequences to their actions and. sometimes the consequences are small you. know when you're dealing with podcasts. but then sometimes the consequences have. global implications and uh and I think. these people are realizing that. >> that right now um so Don I what what's. next now what does this process uh bring. you. >> I will answer I will answer that however. I wanted to I just saw that we have a. video when you asked me about knowing or.

not knowing I think you can see like the. look on my face is this is when I walked. Andy, you can play and just let play the. sound low and I'll talk over it. But. this is when I walked out um of jail and. my husband is kind of leading the way. and I'm looking going, "What the is. going on here?" And I, you know, I kept. then the cameraman right here, this. cameraman, there so many people there. One of them falls down. I try to help. him up. Um and and then I, you know, I. had to make my way. You see Matt Gutman.

Um, there's one of the photographers who. works for my team. But once I got to. that thing and I saw the helicopters, it. started really to sort of hit home about. how big it was. But I'm just sort of. looking around like, look at my face. >> I'm like, "Holy what is going on. here?". >> So, uh, what is next for me? I don't. really know, Brian. But I will tell you, I don't know. Look, I know what's next. for me is that this is serious. These. are criminal and federal, um, charges, so I have to take them seriously, but. they're not going to steal my joy. I. still have to live and they're not going.

to silence me. I still have to report. and do what I what I do here on my. channel and and everywhere, you know, public speaking or whatever. I'm still. going to do what I do. I have to. It's. not it's not just my livelihood. This is. my profession. Um this is, you know, this is a mission for me to be able to. tell the truth and to be closer to the. people, closer to the ground without the. corporate influence. And I have to say. people like you have who've been so. great uh you know in advising me you.

know just cuz I was like some big deal. cable guy. You know I told you coming. into this that doesn't mean that I'm. going to be a big streamer. >> People don't know who I am. What's your. advice Brian? You know and you gave me. some advice and David gave me advice and. others and I really took that to heart. And I think the reason that I've been. successful in that is that I did not. come in thinking like I was some big. shot or I didn't I don't judge it. I. just do it and I think that's part of. the reason for the success but also. because of the support we have as.

independent in this independent media. space. Do you disagree with that? >> No, I think I think that's I think. that's spot on. And and I think that you. know you what we've seen over the last. few days is there is a there's a big. difference between how independent media. operates and legacy media operates. And. I I think the scarcity mindset that. exists in legacy media or corporate. media doesn't exist in independent. media. and and there is a sense that you. know we need to support each other. There is enough enough to go around um. and and there is a broader mission I.

think that that all of us are focused on. and that's that's uh that's why we do. this. >> Um [clears throat] but look I I just. want to say that that I'm I'm grateful. for uh for your voice. I'm grateful for. the fact that you're that you're. fighting as hard as you are. I I know. that I speak on behalf of, you know, myself and all of all of these other. folks in independent media and saying we. see we see, you know, what could be a. Tuesday for us in what you're dealing. with right now. And so, uh, and so any. any support, any help, um, any. amplification you need, we're all we're.

all, you know, behind you 100%. So, uh, just want to just want to thank you for. for fighting as hard as you are. >> Thank you very much, Brian. It goes the. same to to you as well, from me to you. So, thank you so much. and I'll see I'll. see you around these independent streets. very soon. >> I'm joined now by the ranking member of. the Senate Intelligence Committee, Senator Mark Warner. Senator, thanks for. joining me. >> Brian, thanks again for having me. >> So, we've had a lot of news pop up about. this whistleblower complaint as it. relates to Tulsi Gabbard, who was. apparently present while the FBI was. executing a search warrant in Fulton.

County to take the 2020 ballots. So, first and foremost, what's being done to. figure out what this whistleblower. complaint that's apparently being. suppressed actually says? Well, remember Tulsi Gabbard. swore under oath uh that she would absor. observe the rules about whistleblower. complaints when she was up for. confirmation. This whistleblower. complaint, which I've not seen yet, I. will see shortly um was actually brought. to the department, I believe in June.

Now, if you follow the rules and this. whistleblower wanted the complaint. reported to Congress, you know, there's. like a 21-day processing period. So, they should have reported. the complaint giving them the benefit of. the doubt by the end of July. >> Yeah. >> We didn't even know there was a. whistleblower complaint until November. And then it's taken literally the the. bipartisan gang of eight to say, "What. the hell? Send it to us." and we're just.

getting it now. Um, I've heard rumors. about the subject matter. Once I see it, I won't be able to talk about it. The. content, but it's even if the. whistleblower complaint is not, you hair. on fire. It it does mean that this. obligation she has, this is not just. some like, you know, well, I uh maybe I. should, maybe I would. No, this is the. freaking law. She should have reported. it to Congress within 21 days. And then. once we did discover it, the fact that. it still took almost 2 and 1 half 3.

months of negotiation and remember she's. not just dissing me or Hakee Jeff, she's. dissing Mike Johnson and John Thun and. all the appropriate authorities. So it's. yeah again the litany on Tulsi Gabbard. and her inepness for this job goes on. and on. >> So I have a bunch of questions here. First is. are we certain that the whistleblower. complaint is regarding Tulsi Gabbard? I. do not know. >> Uh the next question is, is there a. chain of of custody that shows who's at.

fault for suppressing this whistleblower. complaint that was supposed to be. transmitted to you this summer? >> Well, we got some, you know, letter when. when the whole gang of eight was um. putting pressure well that somehow she. didn't know she had to do this. Well, that's why you have a lawyer. That's why. you also when you testify and say, "Senate, please confirm me. I'm going to. follow the law." And then she chooses. not to. There ought to be consequences.

So, um, you we'll see whether my. Republican colleagues are going to do. anything or whether they'll just say, "Well, you know, it took longer than it. should, but we're not going to hold her. accountable." Um the fact that it had. took all eight of us almost three months. uh within the gang of eight to kind of. get it. I I would hope they would be. just on plain process grounds pretty. pissed off too. >> The the next question I have is we have. seen Tulsi Gabbard kind of come into the. news because again as I mentioned at the. top she's now involved in this whole.

effort to uh to get those ballots that. were used in the 2020 election. Anybody. who's watched politics over the last, you know, five years, six years knows. that the only reason Trump is interested. in getting these ballots is he wants. somebody, some some, you know, stoogge. to be able to come out and say, "You're. right, President Trump. There was fraud. in the election. There was some. subversive nefarious activity in the. election." That will give him a pretext. to be able to say, "Oh, there was fraud. just like I thought in 2020. That means. in 2026 or 2028, we have to really.

hunker down in a way that we didn't do. before. and I should be able to oversee. the elections. We should have. Republicans in charge. We should be able. to seize the voting machines. We should. have access to the ballots. We should. gain uh visibility into the voter roles. All this stuff like this is Trump's. fever dream. Tulsi Gabbard's involvement. in this seems to me and I'm curious what. your thoughts are on this because as. DNI, she should only be able to have. kind of her her, you know, area of focus. should just be foreign interference in. elections. if she can come forward and.

say, "You know what? I've uh I've I've. done my research and we have Italy and. Switzerland and China and Venezuela who. conspired with Joe Biden's FBI and CIA. and I as DNI can can confirm there was. foreign interference in the election and. then of course that would give Trump the. pretext that I was talking about to be. able to, you know, go ahead and and and. meddle in the next election." Is there. some concern that that's what Tulsi. Gabbard's job is in all of this? Well,

you you've laid it out pretty well. I. mean, let's look at this. The National. Security Act, which set up the, you. know, this whole notion of how we have. oversight of national security, happened. because Nixon and Watergate. And so, that was what the creation of the. intelligence committees were to do the. oversight. And we made very clear in. that one, our spying agencies are only. supposed to look outside the country. They're not supposed to spy on. Americans. The FBI in terms of criminal. stuff is supposed to deal with that. So.

Tulsi Gabbard has no jurisdiction on a. domestic criminal investigation. She. didn't even tell the FBI she was coming. What in the hell she was doing there? Um. other than potentially trying to curry. favor with Trump, I don't think there's. any legitimate answer. And she has yet. to give any false. If she says, "Okay, now all of a sudden, six years after the. fact, lo and behold, I found all this. foreign interference." Well, I read my. intelligence briefs pretty damn well,

and if there was any evidence of even. hints of this, we would have heard about. it within the normal intelligence. channels. Or if she's been cooking up. this theory and then doesn't report it. to the intelligence committees, which. are her oversight committees, she's. breaking the law again there, too. She. said she would timely report to her. committees on oversight. So this is I it. is wacky. I mean a year ago may and I. was maybe slow because I didn't think.

that Trump a year ago would be this. outrageous when people said 26 28 are. you concerned about the security of. elections? You know, I said a. possibility, but I wasn't a as. concerned. The last six months, in the. last couple weeks, my concern level is. really, really shot up coming on top of. the the outrageous activity in. Minneapolis or the potential of using. ICE patrols to to show up around polling. stations and then Gabbard's, you know, beyond kind of the belief um.

performance. And then put all on on top. of that and you don't have to speculate. now Donald Trump's own words that. somehow say oh yeah Republicans should. run the election should nationalize. elections that is against the. constitution and every Republican state. when we tried to put in the first level. of security for our elections after the. 2016 election and remember this is Trump. won anytime there was efforts to even. like for example share cyber security. standards with state local elections.

they said oh wait not we're We're not. we're not sure we want that cuz that. could be federal intervention. So I know. we live in the Alice, you know, down the. rabbit hole, Alice Wonderland, but up is. down and down is up where Trump is now. calling for federalization and. Republicans and taking control of the. elections. >> And Gabbard as his kind of protege in. this again, if you're not worried, you. should be. In terms of of the fact that. this whistleblower complaint exists, I I think you and I could both agree. that if the shoe is on the other foot.

and there was some Biden administration. official uh for whom a whistleblower. complaint was lodged against them and it. was just sitting there and it wasn't. being transmitted to Congress, this. would be like the national outrage. Fox. News would be talking about it 24/7. there would already be hearings about. the fact that there should be a hearing. about what the whistleblower complaint. itself says. And so my concern here is. that enough isn't being done given the. fact that that not just process because.

I don't think that people really care. about process. And in fact, I think that. our collective adherence to focusing on. process above all else has been a little. bit of our our our downfall. But but. just the fact that this exists and and. the administration is allowed to police. itself to the point where even. legitimate whistleblower complaints. about themselves are being suppressed. kind of in the same vein as how. shootings done by DHS are being. investigated by DHS. I mean this should. be a much bigger story. What what is the. plan among you and your Senate.

colleagues to get this thing out front. and center given the fact that you know. there is a this is this is a really. significant issue and if again the shoe. was on the other foot it's all we'd be. hearing about. >> Amen. They would be completely their. heads would be exploding. I think this. is my eighth or ninth um press hit today. on this. I did a big press conference. trying to get this out into the. bloodstream. But remember we still have. the DHS ICE hearings the government just. got funded. I will give, you know, thon. at least a margin of credit that he said.

today, well, we don't think we can. nationalize elections. But this is where. if we can't get Americans upset, if we. can't force our Republicans. to find a spine, we can hold what we. call a shadow hearing. Uh, but it will. get it won't even get picked up by by. influencers. So, >> well, I mean, look, if you if you host a. shadow hearing, I I'm I'm telling you. right now, I'll cover it and I'll reach. out to other to other folks in the.

ecosystem. >> We will we will see if we I am still we. we know we're going to get gabbed in. front of our committee. >> Will that be public? Will that be public. or private? >> That will be public. And and you know, unfortunately, it's not until next. month. It's not until the be beginning. of March, but we will have her. Um we. are going to do election security. hearings in the intelligence committee. I'm still working with Cotton on how we. get it done. Um, and I'm concerned, frankly, not only because of what they. could do in the fall or what they could. do in the primaries, but you know, we.

could will probably have a statewide. voter ref voter referendum on. redistricting in Virginia in April. So, Virginia could be the let's try our new. techniques here. >> Yeah. >> So, we are going to bang the drum. We. are going to get folks as, you know, upset as possible. I mean, the challenge. though, for example, when all of the. awful stuff um was happening in. Minneapolis, it was, you know, it's.

awful, but it's true. Until Ms. Good and. then Mr. Prety were brutally killed. We didn't get the Republicans to the the. floor or to the table on um ICE reforms. Yeah. Even though there was a lot of bad. stuff happening beforehand. Um, and I am. wide open for you or any of your viewers. on what else uh uh we should do because. you're right. If it sounds like all. process and when you're supposed to. report a whistleblower or when not, I. mean that I think you can get lost in. I.

think the thing when President Trump. says he wants to nationalize and have. Republicans take over elections and when. you've got a director of national. intelligence not even telling initially. the FBI that she was coming and showing. up way outside her lane, people ought to get pissed, >> right? I'm pissed. >> Well, I I I look forward to hearing more. about that. On the issue of ICE funding. itself because now this is, you know, gone this uh this bill to keep the. government, you know, to to reopen the. government um will obviously get signed,

but that includes a twoe continuing. resolution just for DHS funding. There. are there seems to be a little bit of an. impass in terms of what the Democrats. are asking for and the Republicans um. willingness to accept that stuff which. includes in part masks for ICE agents or. cameras for ICE agents. Can you give us. I think first and foremost I I have to. ask you know there are a lot of people. who don't have faith that even when. Democrats put down their red line issues. that the Democrats are going to abide by.

it. Um and we've seen other instances in. the past where Democrats have caved even. though they had imposed their red lines. like with ACA funding for example. So is. there a commitment that you can give. that that you know on certain issues the. that DHS funding won't be given unless. those those uh those demands are met. >> I'm not going to vote for any additional. ICE funding or unless we get some. reforms. It's as simple as that. But I. also would just ask, you know, uh, for. some folks um, to realize,

and again, I come from Virginia. We got. a lot of federal workers. We had a lot. of when you shut down the federal. government. Who you really hurting? You're hurting. federal workers. >> Yeah. >> Who may or may not get paid at the end. of the day. And the thing that. completely makes me a little crazy when. I hear from some of my calls, well, let's shut it down. Shut it down. Shut. it down. The very same folks. who are being discriminated against in. Minneapolis and elsewhere on these ICE.

raids. are often the people who are the. contractors because the people who clean. our federal buildings, the toilets, the people who do a lot of. the jobs that used to be federal. employees, they're all contractor jobs. now. So you put that person out of work. for a month and a month and a half, they. get no reimbursement. And I just hope as we think about, you. know, all of our threats and it, you. know, and and and you know, I listen, I. stuck all the way through on the.

healthcare fight. I thought healthcare. was important enough, but there is. sometimes a cavalier attitude. about, well, shutting down the. government. That's not going to that's. not going to harm folks or it's not. going to bring a burden when frankly. federal workers are disproportionately, especially after Doge on our side. So, let's we're going to stick to it. Um, and do I do I think that Republicans are. going to give on everything? I'm not counting on it. Um, and I think. we have to keep the pressure on, but I.

but again, I go back to we shut down. DHS. Let's have it. But, God forbid we. have a um um a challenge at the airport. when TSA agents aren't being paid and. >> and folks that are air traffic. controllers and others. I mean just we. got to we got to push with all we can. and but and again this is why I get the. big bucks because you got to weigh these. you got to weigh these you know these. these challenges but it it's not.

there are people at the other end of a. federal government shutdown that I just. would ask everybody to think about and. they are generally speaking. disproportionately who support our point. of view and want these reforms but yeah. and that's why one of the reasons why. you we all realize it was going to take. a couple weeks. That's why, thank God, you know, the other 95% of the. government is going to be open. So, we're not holding, you know, the. Republicans were holding the rest of the. government hostage. And the fact that we. got that open, uh, I I think I call that.

a win since we can now fight this battle. entirely inside the DHS entirely on the. ICE issue, which I think is again a. smarter thing for us both politically. and for the the the numbers of people. that will be affected if we go back into. even a partial shutdown. >> Yeah, I I I agree with that. I think I. think it is smart just to to focus this. narrowly on what's happening at DHS. And. I hear you on the fact that, you know, there are going to be people who are. hurt, but the reality is there are. people there are people gonna that are.

going to be hurt regardless. Like if if. DHS has no guard rails, who's to say. that there won't be another shooting, another Renee Good, another Alex Prey. tomorrow. And so, you know, again, to. your to your point, you alluded to this. This is this is, you know, this is the. give and take. This there there is no. there is no, you know, silver bullet. There's no formula that's going to be. that's going to work perfectly for. everybody. somebody's going to get hurt. And unfortunately, that's the situation. that Republicans have put everybody in. by by trying to fund an agency that is. completely lawless and then putting all. of their weight behind getting no.

conditions uh behind. >> DHS fun. And and and that's again where. and I think people get this in their gut. and I don't want to like get you down in. the weeds again, but there are so many. freaking things. that have blown past any kind of norm, any kind of law. I mean, if we just. talked about the president of the United. States saying we ought to nationalize. elections, that in itself would be a. week-long story of of of old traditional.

front page. If we simply talked about. the director of national intelligence. somehow interfering in domestic criminal. investigations, that would blow people's. minds if we thought about, you know, obviously we we were focused on the. awful things that have happened in. Minneapolis and elsewhere. when you. focus on the fact that in my state 75 to. 80% of the people who have been picked. up on the ICE rates have created. committed no criminal infraction. So there is this theory of they keep. throwing crap at the wall. >> Yeah. >> And um you know again I'm not.

complaining. I'm asking folks to hire me. again. So I'm you know I'm it's part of. the job but it it is a little. overwhelming and I fear that that people. become almost numb to it. Yeah. >> And when when all of this behavior. becomes you quasi rationalized, that ain't good for the country, that. ain't good for, you know, legitimate. political discourse or legitimate. political rule regardless of what. happens going forward. >> Yeah. Look, I and I do think the onus is. on on those of us in the pro-democracy.

ecosystem to make sure not to normalize. any of this behavior and to push back. when there are whistleblower complaints. against the DNI when there are efforts. by the president to nationalize. elections or put Republicans. unilaterally in control of elections. And you know, that's that's the work. that I do. It's the work that you do. And uh and uh you know, it's it's it's. difficult when you are contending with. an opponent who whose whose goal is to. flood the zone with But I think. you know like you said that's that's the. hard work that needs to be done. So. >> well one of the things I would ask Brian. of of you and everybody in the promocal.

end but you know we need to have an. organized timeline even if this goes. fades from the news for a week. of what are the key times that we got to. make sure they're not pulling any more. funny business. through this whole process period. you. in Virginia that'll be, you know, if if. there is an April referendum, it won't. be on April 21st, the referendum date, I. think they've said, but it'll be weeks. before the primaries. We've got to make.

sure we don't because I'm fearful now. that they may go to subtrifuge. They may. try to, you know, and this is again goes. back to why the whistleblowers have to. be respected. They got to have a due process even if. they're not their claim is is is not. valid, but they got to still have a. process. >> Yeah. And I really part of my job is to. to make sure that that the you know the. rhythm of the election they don't screw. things up even more. And the truth is a.

lot of the sec the situations that were. set up actually were set up in the first. Trump administration after the Russian. intervention. So the FBI center on on. election interference that's been shut. down. The the director of national. intelligence formal line influence. center that's by law. She shut that. down. cyber security, the CIS agency, a. third plus of the P folks who are doing. trying to give local election officials. the tools they need to make their. election systems more secure. That's.

been cut. So, it's it's and that's again. the part where. if this was the shoe was on the other. foot and I know we can, you know, this. is uh. we got to we got to just keep fighting. like hell. >> We'll leave it there. Senator Warner, thanks so much for taking the time. Thanks so much, Brian. >> To listen to the audio version of this. episode, click the link right here on. the screen and make sure to subscribe. And of course, to see more video. content, that subscribe buttons on the. screen as well. [music].